Jennifer Sey Keeps Getting Canceled for Speaking Up
"I think the Democratic Party has severely underestimated how many people like me there are," says the 1986 USA Gymnastics national champion.

In 2008, Jennifer Sey was subjected to a vicious backlash after the 1986 USA Gymnastics national champion released Chalked Up, the first memoir published about rampant abuse in the sport. Her new book, Levi's Unbuttoned: The Woke Mob Took My Job but Gave Me My Voice, feels like a continuation of that story, detailing Sey's ouster from the jeans juggernaut—where she was set to become its first female CEO—after she again ruffled feathers earlier this year. This time she wasn't speaking out against abuse in sports; she was speaking out against COVID-19 school closures.
In November, Reason's Billy Binion interviewed Sey by phone about what led to her new book—and why the lifelong Democrat is now politically homeless.
Q: You were one of the first people to speak out in detail about the abuse in gymnastics. It wasn't received well. How do you relate that experience to your experience speaking out on school closures?
A: After [former U.S. women's gymnastics physician] Larry Nassar's arrest, the gymnastics community sort of reassessed and then coalesced around me, kind of pretending that they always had. Which was not the case, but I welcome anyone to the fight. I kept reminding myself that when you say a hard thing that people don't want to hear, the response can be, "You're lying." But ultimately the truth does win out in the end.
Q: Do you feel that's happened here?
A: I think the truth has come out in that there does seem to be a consensus that schools were closed too long and that there were tremendous harms done. But there doesn't seem to be any acknowledgement or accountability that someone made these choices. To some extent, USA Gymnastics had to own its mistakes. I think that's the piece that's missing now with school closures. We have not reached the acknowledgement and accountability phase that this was a policy choice informed by public health, made by local government leaders, influenced by teachers unions.
Q: How do you reconcile those things: that a consensus was reached in your favor but that you still lost your career?
A: The response from Levi's has typically been that they supported my open schools advocacy but didn't support my pushing back on public health. Those two things are contradictory. It's word games, really. But I'm not the great tragedy in this situation; it's the kids who are. And so what I'm most committed to is continuing to push forward on normalizing free speech and open debate and dissent. Because if we had been able to have a public conversation about the harms of school closures, I feel like we could've reached a very different decision and opened schools sooner. That's not what happened.
Q: You were a Democrat for 30 years. You now say you're politically homeless. How does that feel, and how do you respond to those who say that you must be a Republican now because you're not a Democrat?
A: I think the Democratic Party has severely underestimated how many people like me there are: lifelong Democrats who watched as their basic rights just to move freely and send their kids to school were taken away for over a year, which seems to me the most undemocratic thing I can fathom. I didn't register as a Republican. I have issues with both sides. The idea that if you talk to someone then you automatically hold all of their beliefs is ludicrous. And that kind of defines this moment for me.
Q: What do you think people most get wrong about you?
A: That I've somehow been red-pilled and now I'm this alt-right, QAnon conspiracy theorist. I very logically challenged and questioned policies that have now been proven to be incredibly harmful. I stayed true to what I thought the Democratic Party stood for. I don't think I've changed.
This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Jennifer Sey Keeps Getting Canceled for Speaking Up."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
A Short video by Dave Rubin showing what San Francisco looks like near Twitter headquarters:
https://twitter.com/RubinReport/status/1618422328937033728?t=OVZAQBFSZDZCuwGDcAp8cg&s=19
When I was visited there about 15 to 20 years I thought even back then that it was easy the most filthy, disgusting place in the world I had ever seen (and I've been to some legit third world countries), and if anything it looks like it's far worse now.
And this is what most of America would like if Park Slope Welchie and Goth Fonzie Woppo's beloved far lefties got total absolute control of the country everywhere.
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
She got to see and experience what the Democratic party is and hasn’t yet come to terms what they have always been. Perhaps like a Catholic that still goes to church and tithes. Plato talked about folks not wanting to leave the cave. Good luck Jennifer.
Yeah, as any kind of true Democrat Sey had to be onboard with some types and degrees of social and economic engineering. It was only when the doctrine came for her preferred viewpoints that she questioned the Party.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
^This^
It also explains why people like that will continue to put up with the cognitive dissonance and keep voting dem
Sorry, but if you're not a 100% doctrinaire Democrat, you're a MAGA hat wearing Rethuglican deplorable racist bigot.
Are you looking for a media job?
Nope. Just paraphrasing the Washington Post’s commentariat. Those are some vicious people when it comes to the insufficiently doctrinaire.
And vice versa, according to the Reason commentariat.
Lefty shit whines some more.
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
You're unsurprisingly uninformed, Scato.
You'd be mistaken. The "deplorables" aren't the ones running the Republican Party, yet the cancel culture progressives have massive influence over the Democratic Party.
You're unsurprising full of shit, spam.
"I stayed true to what I thought the Democratic Party stood for. I don't think I've changed."
After its 1968 Convention the Democratic Party tricked a lot of liberal minded people into thinking it stood for anything other than naked ambition and power.
"Yes, but the parties switched"
Sorry, luv, but they didn't. The party just learned to lie better.
And since the 1964 election Republicans have totally abandoned any pretense of limited government or stand for any actual idea. My parents were toddlers when American politics was ruined.
★ I am making $98/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is acquiring $20 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it. simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart....
HERE====)>OPEN>> http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Where are “politically homeless” people going to go?
If 2024 comes down to Harris -vs- DeSantis -vs- a bunch of people who have ZERO chance of winning, who will Sey vote for? Who will Tulsi Gabbard vote for? I doubt that either will vote for DeSantis. If the Democrats can count on their votes, are they really politically homeless or just politically unhappy?
I’m “homeless” from the other side. I haven’t considered myself a Republican for over 20 years but the R’s got the majority of my votes. I held my nose and voted for the lesser of two evils. So am I really politically homeless or just an unhappy Republican?
I'd love to see Reason explore this issue with people who claim to have left either mainstream party.
That would take actual journalism.
Let’s just demonize Republicans for not voting Libertarian and nod our heads when those unhappy Democrats vote for KamKam anyway instead.
That Andrew Yang guy keeps saying the hot new party will be his Forward Party. It seems to be 99.9% talk and he doesn’t show signs of realizing how difficult it is to build a new party.
Meanwhile the Mises Caucus has turned the Libertarian Party into a complete and total embarrassment to libertarians. So, the LP is effectively dead.
Personally, I now despise the very idea of political parties and would love to see them all outlawed. I’ve lost any faith I had that salvation for the human race can come through politics.
"Meanwhile the Mises Caucus has turned the Libertarian Party into a complete and total embarrassment to libertarians."
How the hell would you know. You're a Democrat of the Democrats. Nothing that you've ever advocated here was remotely libertarian.
How you imagine that anybody would mistake your rhetoric and narratives here for libertarianism is beyond me. You're not tricking anyone.
Is that the same LP that ran Gary “Bake the Cake” Johnson with his running mate Bill “Fuck the 2nd amendment” Weld? The one that ran Jo “You can’t just not be racist, you have to be actively anti-racism” Jorgensen.
*Mind you I voted for both of them, but let’s not kid ourselves that the LP hasn’t always been an embarrassment to libertarians (hence the distinction between big L and little l).
more embarrasing than having some fat guy in diapers parading around their national convention?
Better than the fat old guy that courts Nazis and the KKK.
Who would that be, Shrike?
Biden isn't fat and Hillary wasn't a guy.
Trump. Have you not been paying attention?
TDS-addled liar.
Have you not been paying attention?
Okay Jeff, explain to us how the guy with a Jewish daughter and grandchildren, the guy who became the first president ever to don a kippah and pray at the Wailing Wall, is a Nazi and antisemite.
You just let any old bullshit tumble out of your mouth in the service of orangemanbad.
I’m told that it’s an elaborate plan to hide their racism. Really, really ducking elaborate.
Naah. Simple, abysmal stupidity will suffice.
What’s it like knowing Dolphins are smarter than you?
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
"I haven’t considered myself a Republican for over 20 years but the R’s got the majority of my votes."
In one party you've had kleptocratic professional losers like Romney, Graham, McConnell, McCain, Cheney and the Bush's with their snouts and all four trotters in the trough. They hated their supporters every day but election day and betrayed them every chance that they got.
In the other party you've got actual Nazism. Evil racial theories, corporatism, eugenics, Aktion-T4, Kirchenkampf, the works.
Any third option is always unviable, and rather than being a protest you handed power to the Nazis, every time.
So you're only choices were;
vote for the charlatans to keep the Nazis out of power,
vote for the Nazis,
or don't vote.
However, since 2020 mass mail in voting fraud has and will guarantee that the Nazis will never lose an election again. So nobody has to worry about voting anymore.
Yay!
You left out Trump for some reason.
The multi-decade late night TV scam artist and serial adulterer who demands loyalty above competence is to be absolutely trusted and taken at his word in all things. It is known.
Your party's platform reads like the Nazi party’s 25 points. For all your rhetoric, Trump did not. The man has a Jewish daughter and grandkids FFS.
And I wasn’t resorting to hyperbole or rhetorical excess (like you) when I call the Democrats “Nazis”, Shrike. I mean it literally. That their economic, social and racial policies duplicate the German Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei in almost every way.
"You left out Trump for some reason."
For very good reasons, RDS-addled shit-pile.
Trump probably doesn't fit into the latter category, but he evidently belongs in the "kleptocratic professional loser" category.
Particularly since MoLa suggests that there are only two choices--is Trump 2024 now not a thing?
But you always manage to squeeze out your typical shitpost comments, don't you, Scato?
"Trump probably doesn’t fit into the latter category, but he evidently belongs in the “kleptocratic professional loser” category."
TDS-addled shit lies about Trump!
"since 2020 mass mail in voting fraud has"
Never been shown to exist with even the most basic amount of evidence.
Sure it has.
https://hereistheevidence.com/
Shrieking "There's NO evidence!!!" while ignoring the hard evidence isn't actually tricking anyone, you know.
And even if there was no hard evidence (which there is) the circumstances and vote tallies alone would be enough to warrant investigation.
An old man with obvious dementia and an unpopular VP, who campaigned from his basement, suddenly pulls ahead in the early hours of the morning to win with the highest vote percentage increase in American history and bucks a 126 year old trend.
Not Roosevelt, not Kennedy or Nixon, not even Reagan, Clinton or Obama, but Joe fucking Biden.
And instantly you're not allowed to question it or you're an insurrectionist and they'll kick you off the internet.
Yeah, get fucked with your fifty-centing, and stop fucking sockpuppeting, Jeff.
Every court has ruled against your "evidence". Nothing has been proven no matter how many times your tinfoil hat explodes.
You are like the crowd that continue to argue the earth is flat. You don't live in reality.
No court has "ruled" against any evidence, you stupid lying fuck.
Not a single court would even hold an evidentiary hearing, which is weirder than hell and should raise anyone's suspicions.
So not even reviewing evidence, let alone hearing a case, is pretty much the opposite of what you just claimed.
This is why everyone knows that you're a shill, Jeffy.
What is relevant is "credible" evidence, obviously. Evidence admissible in court. That kind of evidence. No special rules for Trump.
If not even Republican judges Trump himself appointed were willing to progress these "election fraud" cases, that would suggest they were not up to even the minimal standards required for judicial action.
Or there was a "vast, both-wing conspiracy" against him, of course.
"...No special rules for Trump..."
TDS-addled shits want special rules for their constant lies, TDS-addled shit.
"Shrieking “There’s NO evidence!!!” while ignoring the hard evidence"
Am somehow reminded of Misek.
First of all, it's "people experiencing political homelessness".
Second, you should demand a massive public outreach program with government bodies at different levels and NGOs fighting over how best to support you.
Oh man, you are WAY behind the cube on this one. It’s now the Politically Unhoused.
What's with the needlessly insulting "the"?
Science on line 2
"I haven’t considered myself a Republican for over 20 years but the R’s got the majority of my votes."
You're a Republican.
Them's fightin' words...
Fuck off and die, asshole.
They didn't succeed. I'm in the dark as to the essentials of what happened.
She spoke out against the orthodoxy of the DNC and Teachers Unions (but I repeat myself) and got ousted from her job at Levi’s.
Oh, and she thinks the DNC has in the past cared about liberal issues but is too leftist now. Poor lamb.
Sure, sure; Cause all Republicans are alt-right, QAnon conspiracy theorist.... And the policies of the RNC????? That bigoted approach is suppose to be a "very logically challenged and question" of policies? WTF.....?
It's amazing the level of bigotry leftard-media has brainwashed these people. Still --- "I stayed true to what I thought the Democratic Party stood for. I don't think I've changed."
Wait until he notices a pattern of disinformation from the CIA in countries where we don't like the government and compares it with patterns of disinformation campaigns in the US like the Hamilton 68 project that Taibbi and Greenwald have been writing about this week.....
The moment that he realizes that a mix of uncomfortable truth and laugh out loud fiction is the hallmark of their misinformation campaigns to discredit disfavored foreign government leaders, he is going to truly swallow that black pill.
If you know of any QAnon conspiracy theorists, please call our QTip hotline:
1-800-ALL-EARS
But don't go too far. You could poke something you'd rather leave alone.
Levis supports the Denimcratic Party
I see you’ve done some Jean research.
It may seam that way.
That has me in stitches
It was off the cuff.
I was a frayed you’d say that.
Riveting conversation here.
Oh my dear, come on in, the water is fine.
The QAnon, right-wing water is not fine. It’s every bit as polluted as the Democratic waters.
The important question is which water makes better Kool Aid.
Vanilla Mike’s Spring HO2
LOL
1) Boaf sidez
"The QAnon, right-wing water is not fine."
QAnon is a 4chan meme the New York Times uses to frighten idiot wine moms.
The fact that you're shrieking about it tells us that you've already drank Sarc's Kool Aid.
In Mike's world there are only kind, caring people, and the monsters under the bed.
QAnon was made up by two brothers sitting with their laptops in their mom’s basement in Indiana, who were bored and looking to fool a few stupid people. They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
So qanon doesn't exist, like Antifa.
TDS addled shit piles certainly do, TDS-addled shit pile.
Antifa actually exists and was not created by a couple of 14 year old edge lords in their mom’s basement.
Interesting. Who are all those people at Trump rallies/riots with the "Q" banners, signs, stickers, t-shirts, hats, etc.?
Should we ask Rep. Greene?
"“Have you guys been following 4chan? Q? Any of that stuff?” Greene said in a Nov. 2017 social media post, according to The Washington Post. “Q is a patriot, we know that for sure. . . . He is someone that very much loves his country, and he’s on the same page as us, and he is very pro-Trump.”
Greene was also a contributor to American Truth Seekers, a fringe blog, before she ran for Congress. “Recently, there has been a lot of chatter in small circles among those who search for the truth,” she wrote on the site in Jan. 2018. “There has been an anonymous voice, with obvious intelligence beyond the normal person telling of things to come. They call themselves Q. Make no mistake, Q is a patriot.” She also frequently posted the QAnon tagline “WWG1WGA,” short for “Where we go one, we go all.”
In an archived version of the American Truth Seekers website cited by NBC News, Greene is credited with authoring a post with the headline: “MUST READ — Democratic Party Involved With Child Sex, Satanism, and The Occult.” She further pushed conspiracy theories on her Facebook page claiming that March 2019 shootings at mosques in New Zealand were “a false flag… with an intent purpose to affect our 2A [second amendment] rights and try to frame those who are on 8 Chan.”"
"Interesting. Who are all those people at Trump rallies/riots with the “Q” banners, signs, stickers, t-shirts, hats, etc.?..."
You mean the two or three? FBI plants.
Woosh!
Sorry, Diane/Paul, I'm not that easy to gaslight.
You're not that easy to gaslight?
You are the gaslight, Mike.
Don’t worry lady. Democrats aren’t the only ones who believe any disagreement equals total support for the other side. Both sides are full of thinkers and mendacious asses.
Chumby 2 hours ago
1) Boaf sidez
Humorously; Boaf Sidez equates to about 99%[D] and 48%[R]...
It's no secret that Democrats are far more gang-affiliation oriented.
Heck over 1/2 their base is gang-affiliation oriented on race, sex and wealth status. They're constantly trying to create new [WE] gang's of specific-affiliation as fast as they start to fade away.
Leftards just use the "Boaf Sidez" clause to escape taking any responsibility for their parties undeniable idiocy. But, but, but he ate a crumb from the cookie I stole from the cookie-jar so it's his fault I stole the cookie too! /s
There's a massive difference between Republicans and Democrats on this measure. Republicans have no problem admitting their party is doing something stupid. Democrats being the 99% Gang-Affiliation party cannot ever admit their party is being utterly idiotic.
It's actually right there in the party name -- "Democracy" (i.e. [WE] mob RULES!)... No principles. No way to ensure Individual Liberty or Justice --- It's all about GANGLAND politics. Gang-Affiliation is everything.
Republicans on the other hand know the USA was based on a Constitution (principles).
"Republicans have no problem admitting their party is doing something stupid."
Trump 2024.
The fact it exists and has support proves you're wrong.
Trump bigotry on display.
What did Trump do that was so horrible? DE-Regulate? Cut Taxes?
Trump didn't cut taxes, that would be a task for congress. And he didn't deregulate anything of consequence. He did however empower the klan and their supporters.
a'Trump didn’t cut taxes, that would be a task for congress..."
Yes, he convinced congress to pass the tax cut. Which Biden certainly hasn't.
",,,And he didn’t deregulate anything of consequence..."
So all the re-regulating of stuff from Biden is really not much? Like Re-signing the US into the Paris agreement?
"...He did however empower the klan and their supporters..."
No, he did nothing of the sort, but he riled TDS-addled steaming pile of shit like you to lie about him all day long.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
“empower the klan and their supporters”
LOL… Your Gangland-Politics is starting to show.
You just proved my original post.
“We have not reached the acknowledgement and accountability phase that this was a policy choice informed by public health, made by local government leaders, influenced by teachers unions.”
You don’t Sey.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i’ve had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here………………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
She hasn't even ventured into the topic of ladydicks in women's sports.
Let's not get ahead of ourselves here. One problematic view at a time.
The newest team members
1) Don’t express political opinions under your real name.
2) Put your kids in a school that stays open.
3) Profit.
There are millions of folks still capable of holding 2 or more overlapping viewpoints at the same time without feeling the need to give up and crawl under a rock or rotting tree stump. Accountability is an essential component of a functional free society. Let’s not forget, however, that we have the right to insist that everyone behave as adults, do their best to make difficult decisions in good faith, and accept their human fallibility whenever necessary (brief digression: we must insist on honest public statements of responsibility, e.g. “I made mistakes” not “Mistakes were made”).
So yes, let’s come to terms with the mistakes we made with respect to school, church, and business closures. We must accept the fact that we caused significant harm, even irreparable harm in some cases, to our fellow citizens.
So yes, let’s also come to terms with the fact that more than a million of us died of COVID-19 because of poor decisions we made (or allowed to be made). Sometimes these decisions were due to insufficient or inaccurate information during a rapidly evolving public health crisis, but sometimes these decisions were made in bad faith by the leaders and experts we counted on to get us through the crisis as safely as possible. We heard our president say that a miracle would save us and that he wasn’t accepting responsibility for anything anyway. Ultimately that’s on us because we let him get away with that, and much, much more.
So yes, let’s also come to terms with the fact that we knew quite a lot about the possibility of a global pandemic beforehand. Read Laurie Garrett’s ‘The Coming Plague (1995)’ if you don’t believe me. We also knew quite a lot about coronaviruses beforehand, including awareness of some approaches to vaccine development that wouldn’t work. In science failure can be our friend when we learn how to avoid wasting time and resources. Despite all this accumulated knowledge we had to accept much more death and disease than necessary because we had allowed our public health agencies and infrastructure to be hamstrung and hollowed out by politicians and activists from the 1980’s onward. We didn’t want to address the HIV/AIDS epidemic forthrightly because too many of us believed that the victims were somehow getting what they deserved. We insisted that effective programs and methods for sex and drug education be replaced by the wishful thinking of “Just say no” and DARE and abstinence. For years we prevented the CDC from even studying gun violence as a possible public health issue because we saw that as an assault on the Second Amendment. We are all responsible and accountable. “All are punish-ed!”
"...For years we prevented the CDC from even studying gun violence as a possible public health issue because we saw that as an assault on the Second Amendment..."
"shall not be infringed"
Up yours. slaver.
^ This
In 2023, anyone wanting the CDC to look into gun violence is pretty clearly stating that they want more people to die of gun violence and from the CDC’s inept, conflicted, destructive response to themselves having increased the number of people dying of gun violence.
It was their job to prevent COVID and they want to task them with an issue that they are even less equipped to handle.
That million people was over two years time, so let’s not pretend that it was within the span of a few months when we didn’t know that the bulk of those affected would be the Boomer and over crowd.
Oh, and fuck off, slaver.
More than a million died? Learn the difference between dying of a disease and dying w/ the disease. And, fuck off w/ your concern trolling, the CDC has a mission, disease control. 'Gun violence' is not a disease, guns are not a disease. If mental health is a root cause, that is arguably w/in the CDC's wheelhouse, but there are organizations better suited to research mental health.
Shorter version. Central government is the answer. Give it more power & money. Put the right people in charge. Shut up and do what they say.
This is why you need Ranked Choice Voting, so not being Democrat doesn't mean you have to be a Republican.
Ranked Choice means nobody's first choice wins, and second tier candidates who make the right allies end up in positions of power that nobody really wanted them in.
It's even worse than first past the post.
Or. Ranked choice means that fringe whack jobs can’t get elected with a plurality.
Hi Palin!
"Or. Ranked choice means that fringe whack jobs can’t get elected with a plurality..."
Guessing you find anyone to the right of Rand Paul a whack job, no?
I rather a fringe whack job than a consummate insider or establishment “yes” man. The last sixty years have demonstrated what disasters they are.
Rank sloppy-seconds "choice" gets rid of libertarians and other spoilers in less than a minute, so their platforms can be safely ignored.
"You now say you're politically homeless . . . "
No more than anyone else.
Each person has to make a decision for each election. Do you want more personal freedom, or more government control? Read the party platforms, and vote for the one that restricts your freedoms the least. "Voting for the candidate, not the party" is a fantasy. To get nominated, all candidates have to support their party platform.
(and remember, if there were any "independents", the Republicans would control the senate)
"Read the party platforms"
Why? There is no solid history of the major political parties adhering to their own platforms.
First true thing White Mike's written in years. Hope he's all right.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the last two years.
Actually, there is. When the LP rattled the Suprema Corte into overturning Comstockism after the 1972 votes were counted, God's Own Poltroons abandoned dry laws and went ballistic on canceling individual rights and forcing women to reproduce at gunpoint. Childbirth is unsafe; millions of women (but no male politicians or judges) have died from its complications. Upside? Women voters are stamping out this unconstitutional resurgence of slavery. (https://tinyurl.com/2u4x4az3)
Better late than never I guess to realize progressivism is a mental illness.
The Progressive platform was written in 1912, a year before Hitler painted the ginger Birchin Mary holding the Orange-haired Baby Jesus. Where you been?
So I take it that Jefferson's Republican Party is the same as the current Republican Party? Talk about a historical twist!
Very disingenuous of you to equate two different movements of the same name as the same thing.
The Democrats are no longer liberal. And the Republicans are no longer conservative.
Both parties seem to be moving towards totalitarianism.
^ juvenile 'thinking'.
It is also an accurate observation.
[tilts hand]
It's more of a 'seemingly accurate observation' or even self-reinforcing delusion. Kinda like saying an astronaut ejected from a space craft is no longer trying to stay in orbit and the Earth is no longer liberal about keeping him there.
"It is also an accurate observation."
More juvenile 'thinking'.
That's altruism for ya.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i’ve had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here………………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
The inalienable right to free speech was supposed to prevent this thing called “cancelling”.
“Cancelling” is perhaps the clearest most pertinent example of slippery slope behaviour.
Levis has NO RELATIONSHIP to covid other than what cancelling behaviour attributes to it.
If we enforced our inalienable right to free speech, the cancelling slippery slope would be ended and firing someone without JUST CAUSE would result in the penalties it deserves.
Yeah, we could put you in charge of determining what Just Cause is.
You don’t need to do that. Just read a dictionary you illiterate fuckwit.
1. industrial relations, US
a standard that must be met to justify the disciplining or dismissal of an employee
What standard.does cancelling represent?
"This interview has been condensed and edited for style and clarity."
No kidding. There's barely anything there.
But every time they tried reopening schools there was a Covid outbreak. Sure, let's grant that the disruptions to schooling were harmful. So was the virus. Life is sometimes about hard choices, and the lack of basic charity and understanding that policymakers were going to make mistakes responding to an unprecedented global health crisis is unbecoming a serious person. So is complaining about being "repeatedly" canceled, which is a paradoxical statement, especially coming from someone whose opinions are being published in an esteemed magazine.
No, COVID is proven to be a negligible threat to the K-12 demographic. They were better off just getting the virus and not suffer the learning losses they went through as a result of the school closures. Private schools that didn't under go through such closures were not affected by any learning loss.
We could've had a strategy that could've protected those who were vulnerable while letting the rest live on their lives with the virus. Yet the government did much to shut down the debate. They gave no voice to those who were against their lockdown proposals, and as a result, everyone suffered in some way or form.
The lockdowns were a failure. There's no spinning or twisting about it. Yet here you are Tony, coming up with excuses, and having the gall to say those who were against the lockdowns lacked "charity and understanding" when the government and their media allies were unwilling to listen or make compromises. We have a right to call them out on it, and saying such isn't complaining, nor does that warrant getting canceled.
Kids pass it to vulnerable family members fuckwit.
If you want to blame anyone, blame the US, Chinese and Canadian governments who performed coronavirus gain of function experiments that they couldn’t control and when challenged by our own safety standards moved everything to Wuhan where whatever the government says, goes.
We could’ve had a strategy that could’ve protected those who were vulnerable while letting the rest live on their lives with the virus.
What part of this do you fail to understand?
I didn't expect quantifiable data from Tony, or the NYT. Curbside observations, hearsay and apocrypha abound behind fake names and suspect data. Los Alamos NM is not a fraud-friendly environment. Too many residents understand probability and have experienced waves of hysterical antinuclear disinformation. Search "COVID in Los Alamos County" and a reassuring NYT chart shows then and now. Other charts stop right where trendlines change from increasing to decreasing. If the NYT chart is honest, risk is diminishing.
I didn’t expect quantifiable data from Tony, or the NYT.
And you didn’t. As a matter of fact, both provided misinformation in regards to masks and vaccines. The former was shown to be slightly effective with KN95 masks and the latter was only useful for a level of protection, but did not prevent infection, let alone permanent protection, nor did it prevent spreading. The government tried its damned hardest to create restrictions based on the misinformation of the effectiveness of the masks and vaccines, and it’s been disastrous. Don’t make excuses.
'But there doesn't seem to be any acknowledgement or accountability.' Ahem, looking at you, reasonmag. Running a slew of pieces 3 years late doesn't make you courageous journalists, praiseworthy in your integrity.
I would agree that a surface reading of what happened to her is wrong. (A couple short articles is not a lot of detail, but taking what those articles say at face value, her views were neither wrong nor something that should have reflected upon her employer in any case to the point where they wouldn't want her there.)
But I am having a hard time with this being conflated with "woke" or a "woke mob". I'll use the definition of "woke" that the counsel for Florida used in defending the "Stop W.O.K.E. Act" against a legal challenge. He replied to a question from the judge about what "woke" means. "...the belief there are systemic injustices in American society and the need to address them."
I'm not seeing how not liking what Sey said about school closures qualifies as "woke".
The term as it is being used on the right is now a catch-all for anything that they don't agree with from their left. Much like "CRT" has become their term for any discussion of racism in the past or present.
“We have successfully frozen their brand—'critical race theory’—into the public conversation and are steadily driving up negative perceptions. We will eventually turn it toxic, as we put all of the various cultural insanities under that brand category,” Rufo wrote. “The goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think 'critical race theory.’ We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans.”
Christopher Rufo had tweeted this in March of 2021. He has made it clear since that he meant exactly what he wrote. It has been an attempt at branding ideas he and those that agree with him don't like surrounding race. A good villain needs a good name, and Critical Race Theory fit the bill. Once you have the villain identified and named, it is a lot easier to convince people to fight against it. It also has the benefit of enabling people to argue against things that they disagree with using only the label, rather than engaging with those things in a more meaningful, detailed, and rational manner.
Sey undoubtedly has a lot of important things to say, and I want to see those things discussed openly even if I would end up disagreeing with her on various points. However, while labeling her opponents as a "woke mob" might make for a good title to sell books, it does little to contribute to civil discussion of important issues.
No doubt what I've said will just seem like concern trolling around here, but I am sincere in thinking that one of the things that makes our politics so dysfunctional is viewing opponents as enemies to fought by any means necessary rather than fellow citizens with the same right to speak and vote that we have.
Maybe this will help you recognize that cancelling represents woke behaviour.
Even your selective definition of woke describes systemic behaviour.
Here is the Webster definition of systemic “fundamental to a predominant social, economic, or political practice”
That is what cancelling people with different perspectives has become such that employers consider it the standard of “just cause”.
It is the violation of our inalienable right to free speech that has become systemic “woke”.
It doesn’t help matters to obfuscate the clear violation of rights with new words and nebulous meanings.
That wasn't my definition of "woke". I already said it was the definition used by the Florida counsel defending one of the laws Ron DeSantis signed. If you don't like that definition, what would yours be?
Also, our inalienable right to free speech is in relation to government action. I would agree that our employers and other people in society should respect us as we speak our minds, but it is not a right to be free from any consequences of doing so. I already said that I agree that Ms. Sey was not respected here, and that she didn't say anything that would be cause to affect her job, from what I can tell. But that doesn't mean that I would agree that someone should never face consequences to their employment or other social relationships for what they say. Our right to speak freely is not a restriction on other people's right to decide not to associate with us.
^ This is the TDS-addled lefty shit supporting murder of the unarmed:
JasonT20
February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
“How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”
Now that a red-pilled, Alt-girl-bullier, Q.Anon gang from Alabama has taken over the libertarian party, there went any choice for the lady to participate in politics. Instead of the Grabbers Of Pussy reforming to become more libertarian, anarco-infiltrations made the national LP into a smaller, harder, angrier bunch of God's Own Pricks.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Now you’re seeing Reason.
He's answered that before: he means pushbikes, not motorbikes.
Which is a bit like being proud of showering.