Pennsylvania's New Governor Dumps Excessive College Diploma Demands for State Jobs
More leaders should follow in the footsteps of Govs. Josh Shapiro, Larry Hogan, and Spencer Cox.

If a new governor's first act sets the administration's tone, Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro is making it clear he is not planning to help the government's regulatory and education establishments ratchet up licensing and credentialing demands on people looking for work.
Shapiro, a Democrat, was sworn into office on Tuesday. For his first executive order released Wednesday, he announced he was opening up thousands of Pennsylvania government jobs to people without college degrees.
"Effective immediately, 92% of all Commonwealth jobs do not require a four-year degree, roughly equivalent to 65,000 jobs," he writes in the order. "Consistent with this Administration's commitment to emphasizing skills and experience, job postings will begin with equivalent experience needed in lieu of a college degree whenever possible."
For the remaining 8 percent of jobs, he is ordering Pennsylvania's secretary of administration to review the positions to determine which of them, if any, could be revised to allow for practical experience to serve as a substitute for a college degree.
"Every Pennsylvanian should have the freedom to chart their own course and have a real opportunity to succeed. They should get to decide what's best for them—whether they want to go to college or straight into the workforce—not have that decided for them," Shapiro said when he announced the order Wednesday.
It's a big deal that Shapiro is going this route after absolutely trouncing Republican state Sen. Doug Mastriano in the November election. The Democratic Party's strong connections with education unions and college administrations often mean politicians push for more students to attend college. The typical response to the rising demand for college degrees in the work force (and the rising costs of college) from Democrats has been fiscally irresponsible programs like loan forgiveness and more government subsidies (all the way up to and including free college), pumping more taxpayer money into the system and into the pockets of the people who control it.
It's remarkable, then, for a Democratic governor to turn around and say "You know what? We actually don't need to be sending everybody to college in order for them to be successful." Shapiro's first act drew positive attention from Nate Hochman over at the National Review, who appreciates the countermeasures to the very real issue of "diploma inflation" in the United States:
The growth in the share of U.S. jobs that require a four-year college degree is partially owing to a broader shift away from physical-labor-based industries and toward information and knowledge economies. But it's also due to a misguided, and often toxic, cultural and political trend toward viewing college degrees as a prerequisite for participation in American public life. Among technocrats on both the center-right and center-left, there's often a flawed assumption that a central goal of U.S. education policy should be to get as many young Americans as possible into four-year programs, rather than to open up other pathways and models for success.
A widely cited Harvard Business School study from 2017 explains how employers (both government and private) have been increasingly demanding college degrees from people applying for jobs, even when they're not required and even when workers already in that particular occupation don't have degrees. The report uses the position of a supervisor of production-level workers as an example. Researchers investigated current job openings for the position and found that 67 percent of the listings demanded college degrees in order to be considered for the position. But they also found that only 16 percent of people who were already working in this very position had degrees. Were all those people doing jobs they weren't qualified to do? Probably not.
Shapiro's move follows on the heels of similar reforms by former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan and current Utah Gov. Spencer Cox. Both of those men are Republicans, which again highlights how significant it is that this is Shapiro's first major act. Unsurprisingly, the Pittsburgh CBS affiliate reports that Republican state Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman is pleased by Shapiro's act, saying, "Governor Shapiro's executive order to expand employment opportunities for positions throughout state government is a step in the right direction."
Hochman would love to see other governors adopt or even build on this easy political win: "Why not require that government contractors, for example, eliminate unnecessary and burdensome credentialing practices? Or give tax breaks and other incentives to private businesses that do away with them?"
It would be preferable for the government to not play a role at all in determining what level of education a private employer demands of potential hires. There are market signals that can actually help resolve the issue of "diploma inflation," which the Harvard study notes: "Seeking college graduates makes many middle-skills jobs harder to fill, and once hired, college graduates demonstrate higher turnover rates and lower engagement levels."
There are ways for businesses to recognize a misalignment in credential demands that don't require governors or lawmakers to get involved at all. When we discuss dumping oppressive government credentialing mandates, let's not replace them with other types of demands.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Does this count as government actually creating jobs?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link——————————->>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
He did it because he wants to hire more blacks, and most blacks can’t write well enough to get into college, let alone graduate.
Yeah, but most government jobs only require warm bodies. He may have bad motivations, but this is still an overall good. Not putting arbitrary requirements on a job that don't actually increase the skills a worker really needs to perform the job is a good thing.
I've made 64,000 Dollars so far this year working online and I'm a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I've made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I do. 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Literacy is a sign of white supremacy.
I thought it was to provide jobs for single unmarried mothers with six kids.
OMG! A DINO move!!!
Now; That is rare... Could use a lot more of those.
Maybe the RNC should start pitching DINO'S on ballots to win.
After all Leftards are all about [WE] gang-affiliation.
Trump should run as a Democrat... 🙂
Trump was always a Democrat. He hust ran as a Republican.
He sure fooled the Democrats then.. Not a single thing on the Democrats Agenda has been for DE-Regulation especially to de-fund the EPA.
Why would you defund an agency who helps the US have better air and water quality, and cleans up hazardous waste sites?
Start with Gov—>GUNS doesn’t make ‘better’ air, water and GUNS don’t clean up hazardous waste sites… PEOPLE do d*pshit.
BUT MOSTLY; Because the ‘Feds’ (Union of States) has NO AUTHORITY for it by the People’s law over their Government; by the very DEFINITION of the USA.
It is an ILLEGAL agency never granted by the people to exist. And we'll just slap a big never-mind on the fact its #1 doings is poking GUNS at people and stealing their land, water rights and is completely plagued by O.C.D. (Power-Mad disease) as most Nazi-Empire building agencies are.
I earned $50000 last month by the use of operating on-line most effective for five to eight hours on my pc and this was so that i in my opinion could not accept as authentic with earlier than running in this website. if you too want toclean earn this type of huge coins then come and be a part of us. do this internet-website on line .
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
You need to tone down the ‘gov-guns’ screeching. It’s not that you’re wrong, it just sounds so shrill and redundant.
Does it? That’s questionable. It’s also not part of the federal government’s constitutional authority. So it falls to the states. And every state has their own version of the EPA.
So the EPA needs to go.
So a Democrat governor does the same thing as 2 Republican governors but it's better because he's a democrat. And look over there! A judge trashed DiSantis even though he won the lawsuit. And who can forget the gleeful reaction at Reason when Whitmer was reelected. I guess once you've endorsed Biden there are no depths to which you will not sink. And how about that Super Dreamy Polis. Yeah he's got that (D) thing going on but once the mask comes off he's libertarianish or libertarian adjacent or pretty damn close.
Seriously. I am not a Republican. The first Republican I ever voted for in a presidential election was for Donald Trump in 2020. The first Republican governor I ever voted for was whoever ran against Pritzger in 2020, can't remember his name. Reason's pathetic attempts to rehabilitate the Democrats, the most anti liberty party in the nation's history, has gone past tedious and into full on evil. They are the evil party after all.
A lot of republicans politicians are grifters, and dead from the neck up, but they aren’t a treasonous authoritarian Marxist group. The democrats are.
Right now Whitmer is finishing her circle jerk with the other Davos dildo heads. The people of this state make me sick for re-electing her.
Or is this just step one?
Step two; well, since these are not college jobs, they should be union jobs.
And the elephant in the room is never questioned: why does any governor have such sweeping power? Isn't this the kind of thing that legislators spent years bargaining over, and the governor just rewrites it any which way he wants?
At least TFA does somewhat address the mammoth in the room, the idea itself of occupational licensing.
No probably not. They are state jobs so they fall under the executive. He, or the office, is the one that decides job qualifications, not the legislature.
The order doesn't eliminate licensing for private occupations
"They should get to decide what's best for them—whether they want to go to college or straight into the workforce—not have that decided for them."
If you're actually delusional enough to think that Shapiro will apply this standard equally to the private sector...you're in for a rude awakening.
There's a reason he's a D.
I don't see the problem here; they couldn't do much worse than the people in PA state government that have college degrees.
Datz rite. ilitrut hilbilies elected Donul Trump! so dare.
It would be unlibertarian, but if the EEOC would simply get off its ass and enforce Title VII in accordance with the actual ruling in Griggs v. Duke Power Co., the private sector would drop lots of such requirements PDQ. Per that ruling:
It’s in general pretty hard to prove that requiring a college degree has a “manifest relationship” to a job that doesn’t have a specific educational licensing requirement.
It actually was the Griggs case that created the problem -- read the case: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/401/424/
Duke Power was using two tests -- the Wonderlic Personnel Test and the Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test to measure the aptitude of those employees who sought to transfer to higher-paying jobs and lacked a high school diploma. (The court noted that "In North Carolina, 1960 census statistics show that, while 34% of white males had completed high school, only 12% of Negro males had done so" -- figures which would be jaw-dropping today.)
The court ignored one other complicating factor -- a lot of White males dropped out of high school to enlist after Pearl Harbor and there likely were a lot of them using the steam boiler skills that they'd learned in the US Navy. (Back then, every ship had a steam boiler.)
But what caused the problem was Footnote 8: "Section 703(h) applies only to tests. It has no applicability to the high school diploma requirement."
What this meant was that tests were out if they had a disproportionate impact, but degree requirements weren't. This led all the white-collar employers to abandon all of their tests and instead require a baccalaureate degree. From anywhere, in anything -- and as there were HBCUs, the rationale was that this wasn't discriminatory.
This is where all these college degree requirements came from -- and with SCOTUS ruling that disparate impact didn't apply to high school diplomas, EEOC (correctly) interpreted that to mean that it didn't apply to college degrees either.
Remember too that EEOC doesn't have authority over state hiring -- sovereign immunity -- so the Governor is free to do this in a way that, say, General Motors isn't.
It's also important to note that this was just before Richard Nixon created Affirmative Action -- which created a shift from equality of opportunity to equality of outcome.
Instead of having to ensure that all Blacks had an equal opportunity to be hired, employers now had to ensure that a specific percentage of those whom they hired were Black. That's something very different...
Had Affirmative Action not been created, my guess is that Congress would have amended Section 703(h) as you suggest.
"The report uses the position of a supervisor of production-level workers as an example... 67 percent of the listings demanded college degrees [to be hired]... only 16 percent of people who were already working in this very position had degrees."
There is a lot of paperwork in a supervisor's job, especially for government, so literacy is an absolute requirement. Before 1970, employers could require a high school diploma or test for literacy. But Griggs v. Duke Power Co, and the way the Department of Labor used it, has in effect banned any employment test on which blacks do badly, even if the only reason they do badly is that more of them dropped out of school before achieving full literacy - but it allows using diplomas and degrees as a proxy for testing, even though that puts blacks at a much greater disadvantage than testing.
So the high school diploma became the gold standard to establish basic literacy. But that put pressure on the schools to give diplomas to everyone who sat in their high school classrooms for 4 years, whether or not they were effectively teaching anything beyond elementary school, and ultimately whether or not the kid could read, write, or do basic arithmetic at all.
So now, if you really need 4th grade "3 Rs" skills, you require a college diploma for hiring - and hope that isn't also corrupted beyond usefulness. I sure wouldn't want to require post-graduate degrees as a literacy test - even if this isn't also inflated, and even if you can afford to the much smaller hiring pool, you get people either too smart for a low level job, or people that have been "educated" beyond their intelligence and have their heads filled with crap that they are incapable of really understanding.
But if your main concern is that the hirees be like you (upper middle class and mostly suburban), the college degree requirement works great. It filters out most of the kids from poor families, as well as people that have trouble in school (sometimes from learning disabilities, sometimes because they're too active to fit in, sometimes because they're smarter than the teachers, but most often because they came from a non-white or redneck culture that doesn't value education).
"job postings will begin with equivalent experience needed in lieu of a college degree whenever possible." In other words, Josh Shapiro isn't offering an opening to a young person whose family could not afford to send him to college. He is offering an opening to an older person who could not go to college long ago, but took a job and worked his way up to supervisor before college degrees became a requirement. There's an implicit cut off date, and you missed it if you just graduated from high school - even if you made high school a full learning experience and are far more qualified for the job than a typical college graduate with a degree in literature or grievance-ology.
I am pleasantly surprised to read this. Maybe he is more of a true populist — albeit on the Democratic side — and not the WEF shill that I thought he was.
Shapiro is not dumping the requirement for government employees to be members of the communist party.
State Highway Job: Shovel hot black top into potholes.
Qualifications: 4 year degree, Masters or PHD preferred.
Under 30 with 40 years of experience best.
Apply at PAjobs.com
Does it really take someone with a college degree to pick up the dead bodies on Kensington Ave after they've O.D.?
Obviously a college graduate.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
Awesome Creativity within 2min she made beautiful things... https://fb.watch/ibqFRBeGpB/
tatz nusn. i maik twais dat az a vErginya leg ussisstunt. din ivin hav 2 pass uh gee-eee-dee. so dare!
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM