Los Angeles Public Schools Are Increasingly Passing Students Who Don't Meet Grade-Level Standards
The issue is the result of a districtwide policy of de facto grade inflation.

Students attending Los Angeles public schools are facing astounding declines in academic performance. If you looked at their report cards, you'd hardly know it.
Despite a drop in test scores, a rising number of students in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) are receiving A's, B's, and C's. The shift—where, in some grades and subjects, as many as four out of every five students receive A, B, and C grades, while only one in five met grade-level benchmarks—has left thousands of struggling students with limited access to academic help. The trend is likely the result of a districtwide policy encouraging grade inflation which has left many parents frustrated. "Everybody said [my son] was fine," one mother told the Los Angeles Times. "He was getting those A's and Bs… [but] it was not reflecting his understanding of the curriculum and his mastery of the curriculum."
Scores of students attending LAUSD schools are attaining A's, B's, and C's despite failing to meet grade-level benchmarks—a trend that bucks the district's own policies, which require a C grade only when the student "understands state standards." According to a recent Los Angeles Times report on the subject, among the district's 11th graders, 73 percent earned A's, B's, and C's, while only 19 percent met grade-level testing benchmarks. Among sixth graders, 85 percent earned A's, B's, and C's, while only 40 percent met grade-level benchmarks.
Making matters worse, the number of students failing to meet academic standards—yet receiving A's, B's, and C's—is growing, as the district's test scores have plummeted after the pandemic, while their number of A, B, and C grades has climbed. According to the Los Angeles Times, in 2019, 67 percent of seventh graders earned an A, B, or C grade in math—a number that has increased to 77 percent in 2022. For that same period, the percentage of students meeting grade-level benchmarks in math declined by 4 percent.
This shift is no coincidence. According to the Los Angeles Times, the school district eliminated F's during the spring 2020 semester due to concerns over the rapid shift to online learning. When the 2020–21 school year began, the district—where schools remained largely closed—saw an increase in the number of D and F grades. In response, district officials changed guidelines, giving students more time to make up missing work and retake tests. That policy was originally justified by officials claiming that many students lacked the resources to succeed at online learning. However, with pandemic school closures almost entirely a thing of the past, the district is keeping the pandemic-era policies, leading to current grade inflation.
District officials claim that LAUSD is in a "transitional period," and that the new equity-based grading policies are meant to prevent teachers from lowering grades over behavior that is unrelated to subject mastery, like failing to turn in work.
"We're promoting equitable grading practices that are more accurate in communicating what students actually know and what they are able to do and their skill sets, so that we can more specifically personalize the target student needs," Frances Baez, the district's chief academic officer, told the Los Angeles Times.
Though the district insists its grading guidelines will help disadvantaged students, many parents argue that grade inflation has hurt their children, holding them back by failing to identify academic struggles. As one parent told the Los Anegles Times, her son's good grades seemed to be based on etiquette and behavior. "He was very polite. And he tried his best," she said. "But trying is not the same as mastering the standards and curriculum."
The widening gap between grades and actual academic performance shows the perils of letting concern for "equity" drive educational policy. In a quest to pass more disadvantaged students, Los Angeles public schools may in fact be failing them.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I thought the As were in Oakland. Hmmm.
Kansas City? Philadelphia?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link------------------------------->>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Talking with several families, this is not just LA. It is widespread all over the country.
Something rotten really is afoot.
My eldest kid has homework every day in her classes. Her brother (3 years younger) has had no homework. He has gone through the same schools, often even the same teachers, but his cohort of students and all those after have had major curriculum changes. He never has to do homework, and only has periodic long term projects that might require some work at home. He constantly gets A's and B's in classes, but this does not show up in standardized tests. I receive similar reports from friends and family in Oregon, Texas and Colorado.
I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but it seems to me that some significant changes have been made to the curriculum for the classes of ~2025 and on. And those changes are not preparing kids, while also giving them passing grades.
I also hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but as we push for more and more students to attend college, what colleges will have these unprepared students? Certainly not the elite universities the political class attend.
No, they will be relegated to state schools, which will similarly dumb down grading mechanisms in order to pass them. Meaning you either have the money to attend an elite school (or check the right boxes for a scholarship) or you are denied a proper education.
Your 2nd paragraph has already happened. A decade behind the times at least. Including in the elite schools.
Prior to the Floyd riots, at least 40% of college freshmen needed remedial classes just to get up to the bare minimum expected of them. In community colleges, it often ran as high as 70%. There's been a move since then to eliminate these courses--because they know most of these students are literally too stupid to take their regular courses, so they're just going to practice the same old Freirian assumptions that students will magically become more literate if they're just thrown in these classes.
Democratizing education was the one of the biggest mistakes this country has ever made.
Government has no business in education.
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Talking with several families, this is not just LA. It is widespread all over the country.
Yes, this has been slowly ratcheting up probably since the 80s, definitely the 90s.
3 years of Spanish and my daughter can't count to 20 in the language despite getting straight A's. Her competency in the other subjects is also far below what I would expect for a 6th grader, much less a high school student. She is in all advanced classes as well. The standards when I was in school were low enough, but I don't think kids now are learning anything of value. Despite every kid being assigned chromebooks, I see a lot of 2 finger typing rather than normal keyboarding.
The next generation is screwed. Society is dropping expectations to a negative value and schools do nothing to prepare them for the world
I hate to be a conspiracy theorist
I hate to be a conspiracy theorist as well, but I suspect that the government may have been gently nudging the social media companies, to censor non-mainstream and unapproved voices, that vaccines may not have been as safe and effective as initially reported, and that the Steele Dossier may contain some untruths.
It comes from decades of failing to understand causality and correlation. It's been building for a while.
The problem is in determining what makes a school good. For a long time, one of the key measures they've used is the school's failure rate. If students are constantly failing, that's an indication that they're not learning in the school, and therefore all efforts have to be made to reduce the rate at which students fail.
On an individual level, really good teachers can make a difference in this. They can challenge students and push them and get better results from them, getting them to engage with the curriculum, But you can't mandate this from above but it's very individualized-some students simply will not put in the effort or are developmentally challenged, or have such a disruptive home life that there's no amount of effort that can really have an effect. From the point of the view of the administrative state, this is unacceptable.
I've never heard anyone say that the best teacher they've ever had was the one who made everything easy and lowered standards for them. That's never been the case. But it's what is being asked.
Part of the reason is DEI agendas. Administrators look at their numbers and see that black students or Hispanic students are failing at much higher rates than white students. That's just racist, they can't let that happen, regardless whether the standards are identical for everyone. So in the name of equity, it's necessary that you don't let students fail regardless whether they've learned anything.
Because grading isn't a reward-based system. It's an assessment tool. It's for both the teacher and the student to understand what they have and have not learned and where the gaps in the knowledge are. It's important to measure these things so teachers can improve-perhaps they might notice that there's a concept all of the students performed poorly, so the teacher failed to explain it clearly and needs to go back over it for their benefit. Perhaps an individual student isn't grasping certain ideas, so a teacher can talk to a parent about what's happening, or at least create a record so future teachers will have information about this student's weaknesses. And if a student is reading at a third grade level, it does them a disservice to pass them forward on to sixth grade where they're not going to grasp the words being used in their geology textbooks. You need to know the students' capabilities, so having accurate assessments is important.
But that's not how administrative bodies view this. They see that higher grades correlated with success, so the objective is just to give everyone higher grades. The numbers were always abstractions, they weren't what was causing better results, they were just reflected by the processes and capacities of the students that led to better results. They looked at chart that said lifetime earning was higher among people with high school diplomas than those without, so they decided it would better if everyone graduated. They didn't grasp that making it impossible to fail negates the value of the achievement. High school diplomas are basically toilet paper now because of this attitude that arises from a study first conducted in the 1960s, and the way people chose to apply it.
I’ve never heard anyone say that the best teacher they’ve ever had was the one who made everything easy and lowered standards for them. That’s never been the case. But it’s what is being asked.
Yeah, the best ones I had from middle school through undergrad were nearly all high-speed hard-asses who knew their shit. Getting even a B in their courses was considered a major accomplishment, and if you got an A, it meant you were either a total brainiac or worked your ass off to get that grade.
The one exception was my 8th-grade math teacher who was average as far as expected workload went, but had a way of explaining the material that made everything fall into place.
They see that higher grades correlated with success, so the objective is just to give everyone higher grades. The numbers were always abstractions, they weren’t what was causing better results, they were just reflected by the processes and capacities of the students that led to better results. They looked at chart that said lifetime earning was higher among people with high school diplomas than those without, so they decided it would better if everyone graduated.
This is what I refer to as the Cargo Cult mentality. How anyone can confuse cause and effect in this manner is beyond me, but I suspect our "educators" are just that damn stupid. They are welcoming the new Dark Ages enthusiastically.
Requiring homework means more work for the privileged woke class who operate as teachers.
I am coming to see the entire teaching profession to be pretty much like the Air Traffic Controllers when Reagan came in- a great big scam of a job, where people get away with utter incompetence and rank laziness. It has institutionalized this discipline of doing nothing.
Injecting Paolo Freire's theories on teaching into western education has been an absolute disaster in terms of sustaining any kind of functioning society. His whole construct is based on indoctrinating students as marxist revolutionaries, not maintaining stability or actually educating students on how to read, write, and do math.
If equity was the goal, it's working brilliantly.
And the left has engineered this nonsensical worship of teachers as some kind of impoverished selfless heroes. When the fact is most of them don’t work that hard. And where I live, they make very comfortable incomes relative to the cost of living.
I can confirm the drastic reduction in homework from my school days. I can agree to a point. The hours of homework I got each night was mostly non-beneficial fluff. However, what worries me most is the reduction in essays. My child barely has to write at all, and so she has a lot less experience writing than I did at her age.
How is that possible? - in my area we keep voting more technology bonds/levies taxes that are supposed to fix this. You're saying my monies don't just make them smart? /sarc
On a more important subject: mute is working!
+. I've already muted the horrid trolls [nazi, squirrel, hicklib, Tony...] and mostly just use it for bots now. Of which there seem to be no end.
Socialism at work.
Since California keeps electing them, this must be what the people want.
Let them eat their standards when these "graduates" are trying to keep the streets repaired and the lights on.
No Child Left Behind
Now called "equity."
No Child Gets Ahead.
Everyone gets a participation trophy. No one's feelings are hurt.
Iowa's governor announced number 1 priority is school vouchers. Working actively for it. She gets my vote for life.
Strangely, she does not seem concerned about Ukraine.
Anybody else still doubt integration wasn't a mistake?
Went through that in the 60s and 70s. While the intention may have been good, that road to hell was certainly paved with them. Used the school system in attempt to achieve a social goal, and ended up de-prioritizing education, which in my personal experience was huge. I had a few good teachers but learned by reading and pursuing on my own and had no problem with the ACT or getting through college and grad school.
Nowadays I can't imagine being stuck with such a horrid school system. Glad my kids are through that as well.
Honestly, the push by wokists to re-implement forms of racial segregation is rooted in frustrations that integration and equal opportunity didn't result in equal outcomes. There were comments in the aftermath of integration in some places that it had actually harmed minority communities more than it helped them, because things like busing ended up degrading the social bonds of minority communities. The schools might have been worse than the white schools, but they were still "black schools" or whatever, and so there was a sense of community ownership that broke down.
That's where the "equity" push is coming from--they've gone from wanting everyone to exist alongside each other, to declaring that white people need to be excluded entirely from media and cultural spheres (this is where a lot of Kendi's proposals for legislated reverse racism come from). They're mad that simply putting colored kids in the same places as white kids didn't magically create colored kids that performed as well as white kids.
in some grades and subjects, as many as four out of every five students receive A, B, and C grades, while only one in five met grade-level benchmarks
The "gentleman's C" comes to public school.
Public education has become a giant fraud. Burn it down.
Here Emma shows her true colors as a racist White Supremacist. How dare she expect things like understanding and mastery of a subject from school, those are colonialist oppressor terms used by White Supremacists to keep the true people down.
Worse still, she pushes the dangerous conspiracy theory that teachers are there to teach. It is truly the end of Our Democracy if such dangerous, intolerant capitalist thoughts are ever allowed to take hold.
She needs to bow and scrape before her BIPOC betters to atone for such wrongthink.
This is so close to radical leftist thought that I almost believed it was a sincere argument. Well done.
I've heard people say that asking for evidence is white supremacy and western colonialism in action. I don't know how popular that viewpoint is, but the fact that ANYBODY could believe it is just stunning.
Objectivity, a sense of urgency...I believe that is how the Chicago School System defined it.
"He was getting those A's and Bs… [but] it was not reflecting his understanding of the curriculum and his mastery of the curriculum."
Reminds me of an old cartoon. The King announces to his subjects: "I want this to be the most educated kingdom on Earth. I hereby grant everyone a diploma!"
They're called Ni&&ers.
Come out and say it.
The whole world must suffer and die, because Ni&&ers are TOO STUPID TO LEARN TO READ!
Yikes
Niampersandampersanders?
Di%&ers
I hear your frustration; unfortunately you have expressed is in a way that gives joy to the progs: "See, they are all just a bunch of illiterate, racists, bone heads."
As least try not to make it easy for them, m'kay?
Los Angeles Unified School District:
African American - 7.28%
Asian - 7.83
Hispanic - 65.36%
White - 11.39%
(some races deleted)
But it's those uppity negroes skewing the data.
"(some races deleted)"
Misek would approve.
+1
You know what I mean!
My wife is a public high school science teacher in a blue state. She isn’t allowed to give a student anything less than a 40%, even for an assignment they don’t hand in. Not sure what good that’s doing anyone.
This is why there shouldn’t be a democrat party. Or democrats.
My daughter's school was doing something similar. She didn't understand why I was so angry about her getting C's in any class. Between the work being remedial, a 0 being marked at 40% and the grading scale being eased by at least 3 for each letter I can't understand a grade of less than a B. Half of the work is on the computer with the answers in front of them and is repeatable. Legitimately half of their work can be done with zero understanding of the content and they can earn a passing grade
If only people had been properly concerned about this 20 years ago, maybe we could have stopped this. Now it's entirely baked into the educational system, in every state.
Public school needs to die. The experiment is a failure.
Competence is a right wing concept. Prove me wrong.
At this point, I think many on the left would agree with that statement. As they would claim that "competence" is clearly rooted in white supremacy and a heteronormative, cis white male, patriarchal society and is simply a dog whistle to all those secret Nazis inhabiting every inch of this country.
As is being objective and in a hurry [sense of urgency], apparently.
If you have children and care anything about their future get them the hell out of public school, because they are not there to be educated, but indoctrinated. And to fit in to a society that is going to be as dystopian as one could imagine, think 1984 and Brave New World, but worse.
Just another blessing of Commie-Education.
As schools constantly get more progressive, they continue to do worse and worse at educating children. The race to the lowest common denominator as championed by the left is in full effect.
Only GUNS can teach children... That is the lefts bottom line.
Progressive/Aggressive Gov-Gun usage against everyone.
The new equity-based grading policies are
meant to prevent teachers from lowering grades over behavior that isunrelated to subject mastery.Yup, that will work.
Welcome to what the commentariat was warning you about since about... oh, 2015.
Government heroes in action.
Contrary to leftist fever dreams the natural state of any entity is decay. It takes Herculean effort to navigate the every changing environment. Why would anyone undertake this effort when there's an easy alternative?
As we see eventually they won't.
I have to hand it to the Democrats as a party. The won the culture war back in the 1990s and seem to have gotten God out of the schools once and for all… and replaced it with racism.
This is what happens when you tailor your schools to the bottom group of students. You don't want to reward good students because it might hurt other students feelings. So what? That's not how life works. Once these kids get into the real world they will face the fact that their employer doesn't care about their feelings. they care about their results. They will shocked when the higher preforming people get rewards.
Public school teachers have to cope with an increasing proportion of students who show up for school nearly feral and ineducable except through intense and prolonged intervention that schools are not equipped for and can't afford. They have to get rid of them with "social promotion" or be stuck with them for decades, which they also can't afford.
Back to the 60s & 70s:
91-100%=A
81-90%=B
71-80%=C
61-70%=D
51-60%=F
Anything less than 50%=0
There was no "extra credit" over 100%. Unless you were verified sick or out of town, you took an exam on time; no "do-overs." Homework handed in late was a 0%>
I'm sick of the way schools coddle students. The students run the parents who run the teachers who run the schools.
Let students learn things for themselves objectively and quit feeding them equity-based garbage. Let them learn to question everything and learn how to get their own answers rather than take someone's word for it. Something's got to change.
In the 70s and 80s where I lived it was similar (90/80/70/60 instead of 91/81/71/61) but our F was 0% to 60% and we had an X for failure without even trying (vs. an F that was failure but seemed to try). This meant that, for GPA purposes, A=5, B=4, ..., F=1, and X=0. In other words, if you cared about your GPA failure but trying was better than not trying at all.
Common core? Common failure for all. How about teaching more CRT, more sexualization, and having more indoctrination.
That should fix the scores problem! (sarc)
“(giving) grades over behavior that is unrelated to subject mastery, like failing to turn in work.”
So teachers will need to base grades almost solely on test results
That would be a great improvement.
math is racist, science in racist, if my tribe doesn't get all A's, then tests are racist. If I identify as a electrical engineer I am.., if i identify as a chemical engineer, I am. If I identify as a fighter pilot, then I deserve an F-35 right now....
Culture, culture, culture...
Here in Las Vegas we are not allowed to give a 0% on an assignment. If a student doesn't do an assignment they still get a 50%. The average reading level at my high school campus is a 6th grade level. Students don't get held back, they just push them forward and it has a snowball effect, with students learning less and less as they go forward.
I feel bad for students that actually complete assignments and deserve the grade that they got; the minimum F policy is going to screw them over as their degree will mean less because of all of the students who should fail that are still graduating. Colleges will look at Clark County School District and laugh when they see the grades from CCSD because it will quickly become obvious that the diplomas here don't mean anything.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com