In 2022, the IRS Went After the Very Poorest Taxpayers
Despite $80 billion in new funding, the agency is living up to its reputation of hassling low-income taxpayers over rich people.

On Wednesday, Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) released data provided to it by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on audits performed by the agency in fiscal year 2022. Despite the infusion of new funding earmarked for the IRS via last year's Inflation Reduction Act, the agency continued historic trends of hassling primarily low-income taxpayers, with relatively few millionaires and billionaires getting caught up in the audit sweep.
"The taxpayer class with unbelievably high audit rates—five and a half times virtually everyone else—were low-income wage-earners taking the earned income tax credit," reported TRAC, noting that the poorest taxpayers are "easy marks in an era when IRS increasingly relies upon correspondence audits yet doesn't have the resources to assist taxpayers or answer their questions."
In fact, "if one ignores the fiction of auditing a millionaire through simply sending a letter through the mail, the odds that millionaires received a regular audit by a revenue agent (1.1%) was actually less than the audit rate of the targeted lowest income wage-earners whose audit rate was 1.27 percent!"
The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in August 2022, directed $80 billion worth of new funding over the next decade to the IRS so it could hire 87,000 new workers, purportedly to better target millionaire and billionaire scofflaws. The Biden administration and credulous journalists claimed that this would in no way increase audits for those making under $400,000 annually—suspect assurances not provided within the text of the actual bill. This increased capacity meant only those at the top would be targeted, supporters insisted. But this ignores how the IRS's incentives work and how agencywide reform might be too heavy of a lift.
Correspondence audits—which are conducted via mail, and are the type frequently used when interacting with the poorest of taxpayers—are much easier and cheaper to conduct than other types of audits. Plus, the earned income tax credit is easy to get wrong. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that new hires with experience in the field will take almost three years of ramp-up time, with more junior new hires taking longer. The lag time between 2022's infusion of funding, and legitimately increased capacity, will be enormous—if the agency can even snag the best in the industry when TurboTax and H&R Block will surely be swelling their own ranks. It makes sense that, given a dearth of experienced auditors not likely to be fixed soon, the agency would rely on the easiest and least time-consuming types of audits.
But be suspicious of the idea that an infusion of cash will solve longstanding problems within the IRS. This is, after all, the agency that sent $1.1 billion in child welfare payments to the wrong people over the course of merely five months during the pandemic. It's the agency that was hacked back in 2015, resulting in the personal information of more than 700,000 taxpayers being compromised. It's the agency that has been foolishly going after Americans who hold $10,000 or more in a foreign bank since 2010, never mind the fact that many of them are middle-class expats, not folks with yachts in the Mediterranean. And it's the (leaky) agency that enabled the richest Americans' intimate financial information to be thumbed through by ProPublica readers. It will take more than a little cash to fix all this, and, as the IRS's competence and tenacity increase, so too will the tenacity of the vast infrastructure of accountants and lawyers hired by the rich to creatively minimize their tax burdens.
Though some libertarians may argue such an agency ought not to exist in the first place and cheer its relative ineptitude at going after the well-to-do, it's decidedly absurd that the agency taxpayers just fed $80 billion to has, for another year, continued its assault on the poor.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Rich people have accountants and lawyers. And can afford to pay them.
That's pesky.
Poor people might just pay up rather than risk it, or, worst case scenario, not be able to fight yet another wage garnishment. Win!
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.PAYNET2.COM
That’s it in a nutshell. Poor people don’t have the resources to fight it, so they just end up paying, whether its by wage garnishment, or more likely, being docked on next year’s refund.
Well, ya know, those "rich people" pay the vaaaaaaaaaast majority of income taxes, despite the accountants.
Is this sarcasm or are you shaming them because they obey the law? Or do you just not understand how math works?
Well, I can't tell, but it looks like he doesn't understand or believe stats like https://taxfoundation.org/publications/latest-federal-income-tax-data/
.... or graphs like this... from IRS' own data!!...
https://www.plusaf.com/homepagepix/_economics/_economics-04/top10-percent-income-earners.jpg
Maybe they'll learn from that (or clarify their comment??) It's STILL fairly hard to read the facial expressions or tell from the tone of voice when they're typing... 😀
Mandatory minimum sentencing works the same way. Threaten someone with 25-life to get them to plead for 15-20. Whether or not they did the crime doesn't matter, DA gets the W.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.RICHAPP2.com
The rate of improper claims and outright fraud in the EITC are very high. Rates of 21 percent to 26 percent improper payment rate, as measured by the IRS, are typically reported. Some of that level of improper payment is simply due to the complexity of the EITC, but it's hard to measure that and the IRS does not like to report the actual level of fraud, so they always roll it up into "improper payment rate".
So, I'm not at all surprised that the IRS goes after EITC filers. After filtering out the EITC claims that are well-documented and regular, leaving a pile of EITC returns that seem "fishy" somehow, going through that pile will have a high rate of "success" in terms of finding something wrong AND it's pretty easy for the IRS to close the cases. The agents look like they are doing something, they recover a goodly portion of the something like $20B in "improper payments" made.
Like others have said, if some millionaire stretches the limits of the tax law, based on his bevy of accountants' and lawyers' advice, it is going to be a long slog for the IRS agent to prove anything and recover any cash.
Plus, a lot of the loopholes used aren't really even loopholes, per se. When Warren Buffet donates $10B (I forget what he actually handed over) in appreciated shares of stock to a charitable foundation, he creates a huge pile of carry-forward charity deductions that can (and will) be used on the current year and every year going forward until it's gone. He completely avoids all the capital gains and income taxes that might otherwise be due. It is a huge transaction that avoids a whopping pile of taxes, but takes about probably an hour to audit, with little hope of the IRS finding something wrong with the only real questions being things like did the shares actually get transferred on the reported date? and is the foundation properly isolated from the donor's control? and is the foundation properly registered as a valid charity?
Google paying a splendid earnings from domestic 6850USD a week, this is awesome a 12 months beyond i was laid-off in a totally horrible financial system. “w many thank you google every day for blessing the ones guidelines and presently it’s miles my responsibility to pay and percentage it with all and sundry .
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
You have a point. I personally know a guy who works a part time job and pays $150 a month to the Department of Welfare in child support. He also works under the table for good money. Each year since he pays the child support he gets to claim his children on his taxes and qualifies for the EIC. The extra in his refund is about 3 times what he pays in child support.
Spot on, both of you. Apparently, the folks crabbing about 'the rich not paying enough and enjoying too many loopholes' don't understand the difference between "tax evasion" and "tax avoidance."
AND, while they complain about the people who take advantages of the laws, they don't seem to recall who PASSED all the laws implementing those loopholes.
Critical Thinking is Dead.
"Easy marks." Yes, millionaires are going to have CPAs prepare and counter-sign their tax returns. CPAs don't want to lose their licenses, so probably won't prepare fraudulent returns. Low income taxpayers prepare their own returns, or lie to the H&R, Liberty preparers. Far more errors are found in such returns as these amateurs find it very hard to follow the complicated IRS instructions and tax code.
You are mostly correct except in your assumption that lower income tax payers are more likely to commit fraud. Come on. They make more mistakes than those who hire CPAS and financial advisors to file their returns, yes, but don't assume its a deliberate attempt to lie or cheat. You know tax forms and rules are complex and its far tooo easy to make mistakes, even when using programs like Turbo tax.
My husband and I got caught up in IRS rigamarole last year when the IRS made a mistake and sent us a demand letter for thousands, AFTER issuing us a refund. It took many, many hours of unpleasant phone calls to straighten this out... no, we didn't owe them a penny, they had made the mistake due to what the agent admitted were major delays in processing returns and payments. I can't imagine how less savvy taxpayers would have reacted... maybe they would have paid, just to get the IRS off their backs.
Don't kid yourself. Of my more than 300 tax clients, the worst cheaters were the so called "poor". They always justified with, "I wouldn't do this if the rich just paid their fair share". They completely understood what they were doing. Working for cash and not reporting it. Writing off all sorts of personal expenses as "business" expenses.
When I worked for a fortune 200, multinational corp, they provided an office in their NY headquarters building for two IRS agents who audited them full time, day in and day out.
I can't believe that Reason is using the same, ageing trope that "the rich" are not paying any taxes and "the poor" are being punished with taxes. Please at least learn to use the terms "rich" and "poor" and 'high income" and "low income" in their proper sense. Wealth and income are two, different animals.
Nice flex with the fortune 200 thing.
But I think more to the point is what expanding the IRS promised as opposed to what it delivered.
Anyone paying attention knew exactly what progressives using eat the billionaires rhetoric ( while simultaneously trying to track any transactions above $600) would actually accomplish. Focusing more and more on the little guy.
Reasons just getting around to bleating the obvious months after the fact as they do.
The IRS is in the process of expanding. This article is about what has happened in the past.
We do not yet have the results of an expanded IRS, but it will most likely follow the fraud, which is most likely not committed by CPAs and tax lawyers.
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
Kids these days call themselves “Libertarian Socialists”!
So IRS agents are like all other law enforcement in that they primarily target poor people who can't defend themselves. What else would you expect?
Well, if they were competent accountants or lawyers, they would be making it big in the private sector.
They can't risk going against those guys in their field who are able to pull that off. They need a job you can't be fired from for any reason, preferably one that comes with a lot of vacation time and early retirement.
Poor peoples also tend to do stupid things like not declare income they get 1099's for.
Why should they have to declare it? The government is sent a copy by the payor.
Because that is just a gross payment. They are likely to have expenses that are properly charged against it.
Rich people can afford to have people fix the blinking light12:00am on their VCR's; poor people can't. Ditto when it comes to taxes.
The people the IRS are going after are people with unreported side jobs. That’s not a matter of making a mistake or being unable to pay someone to do your taxes for you. They're going after people who are deliberately hiding income.
People with unreported side jobs probably need the money more than the IRS does.
I agree. I don't have a side job because at the end of the year it would be taxes like a raise at my day job. It's not worth the effort.
You may not like the system, I know I don't, but intentionally trying to cheat and stay out of it isn't exactly complying with "the rule of law" that Libertarians like to say they are supportive of.
Who’s cheating whom?
This just as easily qualified as the Rule of Bankers who literally inverted the original constitutional stance on federal income tax. And who use a quasi-legal “private” organization to come after people. So they can spend trillions in patronage to donors and the MIC.
Nah, I’m just gonna go ahead and keep my sympathies with the working poor paying out 30-50% of what the make a year.
30-50%?
I track everything--FICA, property and sales taxes, registration fees, state taxes.
My total tax bill is close to 35% of my earnings. But my income is pretty far into the 6 figures and my fed income tax is in the high 5 figures.
Poor people, with child tax credits, eitc, tanf, wic, medicaid, rental assistance, and the myriad other ways they can get money from the government, are almost definitely less than 10% in total taxes if they're utilizing what's available. Probably many get more than they give.
Everyone needs to have skin in the game, or they lose all incentive to ever reduce government services.
Federal income tax is about 10% if you make $100000/year.
30-50% is what the poor and middle class pay in Europe.
But 'in Europe,' those taxes subsidize all the services that their "governments" supply.
About 45-50 years ago, I visited our sales team in Sweden and I couldn't resist asking the salesman I was with what he thought of the taxes versus benefits.
He said that the services that the bureaucracy provides are fine, but the last time his boss offered him a raise for excellent performance, he tried to negotiate for an equivalent amount of vacation time, since most of the 'raise' would disappear into his tax bill.
Wow, I concluded... the Swedish "government" has decided to, through its tax policies, discourage higher output from workers... aka 'lower productivity.'
Unintended consequence, stupidity or evil plan? You tell me.
I wouldn't even go so far as to say its deliberate, a lot of people simply don't realize that cash income from a side hustle is taxable.
That would take some profound ignorance.
Have you met people lately?
Uh, I've seen it plenty of times in my career.
I’m somewhat disgusted with society’s expectation that everyone watches TV and complies with the instructions given. 1984 wasn’t supposed to be an instruction manual.
If someone doesn’t know exactly how do to their taxes, I consider them “human.”
Nonsense. They’re not that dumb. They just hope that the IRS is too busy to catch them.
I wish them luck.
I'm rooting for people with unreported income from their jobs. The problem is not that not enough poor people report their incomes or fail to pay income taxes. The problem is that the government spends more than double the amount they could possibly spend on legitimate government functions according to their actual Constitutional authority; and at least fifty percent more on national defense than they would need to spend if they had not gotten us into endless wars on "bad guys" around the world. Our national defense would be in much better shape with more efficient spending if we had forced the government to use it ONLY against actual immediate military threats.
Income tax is stupid because it's a tax on productivity. If I got a legal side job it would be taxed as if I got a raise at my day job, meaning 35% (payroll taxes plus state and federal income taxes) gets taken right off the top. That's just not worth it. So I don't. I know I'm not the only one. Think of all the goods and services that are not being produced as a result.
Sarcasmic... think of all the unfilled part time jobs employers are complaining about... "no one wants to work in my service sector 15 or 18 or 20 hours a week job". Humm. Could it be... it's just not worth it? No bennies, not enough pay, irregular hours, too much tax deducted, a long commute, to make it worthwhile?
If that's your only source of income then you're going to pay a lot less in taxes. My point is that because I make a good living at my day job (which includes bennies), any additional income gets taxed at the top rate. That makes it especially not worth it for people who are already employed seek extra money working in the service sector.
I have to say I disagree with your analysis of a side job.
I am a doctor and I have a side job that pays $48,000 a year on a 1099 basis.
Let’s ignore the fact that I could deduct my gas and my home office and just let them tax me at 35% which is $16,800.
$48,000 -$16,800 equals $31,200.
I see that as an extra $31,200 is my pocket every year.
Even for a doctor making 10 times that much at my regular job, that’s still a nice chunk of change.
I’ve been doing it for the past five years, and I plan to work five more years so that will be an extra $312,000 in my bank.
Remember when we found over a trillion dollars in “missing” funds from the Pentagon alone? Then Israelis started dancing when that office got hit by a missile the next day? I mean a plane. It was totally a plane.
Wonder why our masters stopped talking about that part? Guess they found the money. It ended up in Jewkraine.
VCRs???
only way to watch Blazing Saddles.
Also Empire Strikes Back.
Some of my older movies contain 30-year old "coming soon to video" trailers before the movie.
definitely remember those.
Static tracking lines in H.264/265 files are more satifying than vinyl records IMO.
Shoot. We cudda had fun making up a gobbletygook ‘splanation for V.C.R.
whats a "VCR"??
A primitive tool used by early homo sapiens to record tv shows.
Amd for viewing pre internet porn.
For poor people, it's more expensive to fight than to just pay. Lawyers and accountants charge the same rates for the same work. When there's more money involved, it makes more sense to hire a lawyer or a team of lawyers to protect your $22 million, than it does when the IRS is demanding $16,000. You'll pay a few hundred thousand in legal fees when millions are on the line, you won't pay it when that's higher than the amount at risk.
It's simple math and should not surprise anyone.
Shocked I tells ya!
>>decidedly absurd ... assault on the poor.
anybody within six planets of earth think something else was going to happen?
No. They're all dead of COVID.
Like all criminals, the government prefers their victims defenseless.
What we need is a clarification that the amendment to collect income taxes did not include paying money. No "tax credit" is actually constitutional.
Lazy government officials pick on low hanging fruit! News at 11.
"News at 11."
Ok, boomer.
In vain I read to the end waiting to hear what Ms. Wolfe would propose as a solution to fix the IRS such that it would collect the taxes due from wealthy scofflaws. Finding problems is easy. Solving them is not.
It starts with the unproven assumption that all wealthy people are scofflaws, while all poor people try their best to file correctly. Apparently, there are a lot of folks who believe with the Democrats that the only way to get rich is to cheat on your taxes, abuse your employees, fool your customers, and violate the Socialist norms which all right thinking people follow.
It's revealing both the left generally and Reason specifically believe preferred classes should be exempt from tax enforcement. This is not the everyman treatment actual libertarians seek.
The framing also misses why this happens. Low income people rarely use accountants, and amateurs are not as thorough as professionals. The type of mistakes made by professionals cannot be identified by simple matching which is what drives low income audits. These are often triggered by a w2 or 1099 simply being omitted, or a calculation performed incorrectly. These are better understood as corrections and are not remotely comparable to audits.
It's hilarious how anything that follows "It's revealing" is always complete and utter bullshit.
Note how sarc cannot engage the specifics so he resorts to irrelevancies. This is because he isn’t interested in the truth, only in attacking those he hates.
Where in the article does it say a preferred class should be exempt from the law?
Oh, you can't. Because you're not interested in the truth, only in attacking those you hate.
The entire article argues it is wrong to subject low income people to even the most minimal enforcement mechanism of matching. We can conclude this by noting what solution satisfies the alleged unfairness, in this case ending "audits" on low income people. In fact they're so invested in this principle they mislead their readers about the numbers to make the circumstances seem more extreme than is reality.
This is easily understood by everyone except those motivated to not understand they'll do to protect a political attack.
Oh, I see. They didn't actually say what you accuse them of saying. You're making up some inference and accusing anyone who disagrees with ill intent. Or in other words, bullshit.
*yawn*
I applied logic, that's why you can't follow the debate
You just did that Drinky.
Everything he said was true, sorry you don't like it.
His comment was complete bullshit, as usual. The article is about how the IRS is a bunch of incompetent liars who claim to be going after the rich when they're really soaking people who are just trying to get by.
No where does it say that anyone should be exempt from the law.
Wrong. They’re going after people lying about how many kids they have for cash back- full stop.
Youre thinking of your response defending ENB in the roundup thread.
Move the reply button
Its pathetic sarc is unable to follow even the most basic logic. But I suspect most of his problem is that he knows so little he can't understand what is going on.
Judging by what you refer to as logic, I can only conclude that you've never studied the subject.
When everyone but you can understand the problem isn't everyone else.
Based on your comments, it’s obvious you’re incapable of understanding the subject. Instead, you clumsily troll your way in and disrupt constructive discussion. As you are likely drunk (again).
This is typical of your assholish jackassery.
Cite?
Also amusing is that they had to omit similar "audits" of millionaires to make it appear that the audit rate for millionaires was lower. Reason tries to justify this ridiculous pretense by claiming auditing a millionaire by mail is ineffective. But remember in correspondence "audits" the IRS is merely pointing out the return doesn't match other amounts reported to them and asks for an explanation or a corrected return. There is no reason this type of activity can be accomplished for one group but not the other.
And as she points out the correspondence audit is cheaper and easier to complete so a rational person should expect to see more of those than the longer audits. Apparently the 0.16% delta is enough to have Liz pissing herself and frothing at the mouth over the injustice of audits for the priveledged classes.
"Though
somereal libertarians may argue such an agency ought not to exist in the first place"FTFY
How would the young generations of LiBEtaRIAnS stick it to the Kulaks/Rich?
Food truck operators, addicts, migrants and money laundering pop up shops should not pay taxes, rent, water, sewer, energy, daycare. Let ratepayers and taxpayers pick up all of those costs. They should also claim up to ten children with no verification possible for cash back.
Socialism will work this time!!!!
When the IRS first started requiring SSNs for EITC filers' children, even that tiny bit of mitigation action was deemed "racist".
Is it April 1st already? The reason I'm asking is because this article belongs on The Onion, not Reason. The law took effect August 16th. The Fiscal Year ended on September 30th, 6 weeks later. There's no way the Inflation Reduction Act had any impact at all on FY22 tax returns. Where do they get these "associate editors"? Trump University?
Trump U grads would be a huge improvement based on the trash articles published here in recent years. And reason writers have no business complaining. They supported the people that made this happen.
It is an axiom of economics that you get less of what you tax.
Income tax is a tax on work, so it discourages productivity. As far as taxes go, I can't think of one that would do a better job of slowing economic growth.
A flat tax would be worse. A VAT would be worse.
Gee, what a shock that exactly what everyone here predicted would happen actually happened.
It was super obvious to anyone with two functioning brain cells that the IRS was never going to target 'fat cats' with all those new agents. That's hard since 'fat cats' have things like lawyers and can afford to drag out a court case for months or even years.
You and me, though, well we actually have little things like jobs and lives that we can't put on hold purely to fight the IRS. Or, god forbid you're a small business. Then you are proper fucked.
https://reason.com/2022/08/19/fact-checking-industry-continues-providing-cover-for-white-houses-unbelievable-irs-claims/?comments=true#comment-9661917
Why are we acting like this is a mystery or an accident ? Rich people have lobbied for years to defund the IRS so that they don't get audited nearly as much. It takes money and skill (that they gladly pay for) to skirt around tax codes. Likewise it takes funding to go after those types; funding which has been denied for years so it doesn't happen.
This isn't a bug, its a feature. Why are we acting surprised ?
You have no idea how many millions of people in primarily urban areas submit fraudulent tax returns for tax refunds. These aren't identity theft. So yes, most audits are of the "poorest" Americans. These folks don't work, make up a Schedule C to claim some made up self employment income. With some income they get that earned income credit by also claiming their or someone else's kids. If they get caught trying to defraud the country out of $7-$10,000 nothing happens but they might get restricted from claiming that credit for some time. Getting SSI and all the other hand outs isn't enough for these leeches on society.
D.C. already has all the $ they can print. Now you ‘poor’ peasants need to WORK harder and *produce* more bread for the King and his top-paperpushing-men (currently 1 in every 10).
The way things are going it is likely that the road to salvation will be necessarily laced with Marxist skulls.
So if the numbers don't match and the irs sends a letter asking for clarification, is that considered an "audit" in the context of this article.
The IRS, like most organizations use Metrics to measure performance of employees. Going after rich people with lawyers, accountants and friends in Washington takes way more time and produces no easy Wins for the agents and their managers. Their raises and appraisals depend on those wins. Going after the lower income folks makes for better metrics and raises and promotions. That's not going to change until the IRS monthly metrics depend on the ratio of big, fat cat, raise to little guys.
The + IRS = Theirs
LOL... brilliant 🙂
Sorry, my Surprised Face is at the dry cleaners.
Too many poor people voted for Trump and therefore Biden and the Democratic Congress had to punish them.
Biden must have ran out of billionaires to audit. (sarc)
Did you really think they would go after their own major donors? If you did that makes you more stupid than Biden.
Predators always seek the weakest target. It's the law of the jungle.
What? And potentially be taken to court and lose? Are you nuts? We know there ain't no justice for the po-folk.
The EITC is just a cash hand out. I'm not going to feel sorry for people getting that kind of windfall that they have to endure more scrutiny.
I am a former IRS attorney and now a libertarian, who thinks that the
income tax is the worst means, for many reasons, for raising revenue for the government.
I am a big fan of reason magazine, but disagree with this article.
The reason that there is a low percentage of very wealthy individuals who are audited is obvious. They pay a lot of money to tax lawyers and accountants to ensure that they properly report and pay their correct tax liability. The top 5 percent of income earners pay about 60 percent of the income tax revenue and that is after all their sophisticated tax advice. While the lowest forty percent of income earners as a group, pay no net income tax. Working class people are less likely to have income received under the table, which income is made easier not to report the IRS. I don't think the IRS needs more auditors for the purpose of going after the rich, and I suspect that most of these new auditors will not be doing so.
It is the lower income people who frequently receive income under the table, to which they don't report it to the IRS. I believe that the IRS spends little effort to go after such income, because it is not cost effective in terms of their resources to do so. The earned income credit is a major source of errs and fraud. So the IRS should be going after that, but with their limited resources, they can only be doing that with automatic letters, not with office audits and certainly not real field audits.
I think blaming the IRS for its enforcement decisions and practices is not well placed. The real problem is the beast called the Internal Revenue Code. The blame for that is Congress, and not the IRS. I think it high time that poor and working class be called upon to pay more tax, because there is little question that they don 't pay their fair share by any reasonable metric. Because of the complexity of the internal revenue code and the applicable regulations , the IRS has an impossible task. Again the problem is the Internal Revenue Code and Congress is where the blame should be.
No. Abolish the IRS.
Better yet; just expel the jews. We'd take care of every three-letter agency at once, and the (((Federal Reserve.)))
Misek sock?
Oh there's plenty of blame for Democrats $3.5T "The Inflation Reduction Act" successor to the House-passed Build Back Better Act of late 2021.
Growing the IRS by 87,000 employees is just one. Throwing another $265B at "The weather changes religion" is another. Research Tax credits for Government Media is another. The list goes on and on as does the WASTEFUL SPENDING...
For me, the strongest argument in favor of the Fair Tax is that it would eliminate the requirement for individuals to provide details about their finances to the government.
It's fundamentally none of their damned business.
Despite $80 billion in new funding, the agency is living up to its reputation of hassling low-income taxpayers over rich people.
This must really upset Reason’s non-libertarian readers (why they read Reason is anyone’s guess, fucking TikTok has better journalism).
This must really upset Reason’s non-libertarian readers (why they read Reason is anyone’s guess, fucking TikTok has better journalism).
That's a good question, actually. As a non-libertarian, I'll try and answer (for myself, at least). I started when the Volokh Conspiracy blog moved here from the Washington Post. Though I would disagree with the opinions and conclusions of those law professor bloggers regularly, I found most of them to be quite good at presenting and considering the legal and constitutional disputes at the center of many cases that don't get deep analysis in more popular media forms. I also purposefully expose myself to viewpoints that I am likely to disagree with in order to test my own thinking. No one should want to exist in an echo chamber when it comes to politics and other current events. The core of being a skeptical thinker is to take care not to fool yourself. Other people have an easy time fooling you only when you fool yourself first.
Of course, the Volokh blog has gone downhill in last few years, as fewer of the more thoughtful bloggers are posting regularly, and a couple of the more reactionary types are eating up the space. And I certainly agree that what passes for journalism here is not very good. It is almost entirely opinion, for one thing, with hardly anything at all in the way of basic, factual, news reporting or analysis from people knowledgeable in relevant areas. Add to that how these comments are populated mostly by people that do want to exist in an echo chamber, and I am starting to wonder why I keep coming back, myself.
The major difference being that it's impossible to live in a liberation echo chamber unless you never consume anything except for a handful of websites.
Your view of the world is presented without critical thought in almost every news source, every tv show and movie, every university, and now at most large corporations. That's probably why conservatives understand liberal arguments but not the reverse--you have to seek out opportunities to not live in an echo chamber while conservatives have to work to not be exposed to ideas contrary to their worldview.
Why is any of this surprising? The poor pay most of the taxes.
Well, that's just demonstrably wrong. The people in the lower 50% of all incomes pay about 3% of all taxes. People in the top 1% of income pay about 27% of the taxes.
Nope.
Don't you mean STEAL most of the UN-Constitutional tax money?
*Free* produce for all the Pity-Me 'poor', lazy, drug-addicted, butt-poking, deficits of humanity because they are just sooooooooo special.
Holy shit. The opening paragraph includes this:
Despite the infusion of new funding earmarked for the IRS via last year's Inflation Reduction Act, the agency continued historic trends of hassling primarily low-income taxpayers, with relatively few millionaires and billionaires getting caught up in the audit sweep.
Then in the fourth paragraph, she finally starts to explain that the law was only passed 5 months ago, that the $80 billion is for the next ten years, it will take years to hire experienced auditors and/or train people educated in accounting to do tax audits, and that it makes perfect sense that it hasn't changed anything yet.
The lag time between 2022's infusion of funding, and legitimately increased capacity, will be enormous—if the agency can even snag the best in the industry when TurboTax and H&R Block will surely be swelling their own ranks. It makes sense that, given a dearth of experienced auditors not likely to be fixed soon, the agency would rely on the easiest and least time-consuming types of audits.
Way to start off the article stirring up animosity toward the IRS. Only then, to later provide the facts that completely undercut what the headline and subheading are saying is so terrible. If it is bad that the IRS currently spends more of its resources on cheap and easy audits of poorer taxpayers, then that is due to past failures of leadership at the IRS and the executive branch more generally, past failures of Congress to write better tax laws, write better laws governing how the IRS functions, provide better oversight of how the IRS performs audits, and better fund the IRS to do those things. The conclusion that we should be skeptical that this new funding will change things is fine, but Liz Wolfe sticks with a line of argument that these bad things that the IRS is doing are happening despite the new funding that she also showed couldn't have changed anything yet.
Even though the article had a lot of correct, factual information in it, it is still clearly only an opinion piece meant to get libertarians and other readers to deepen the disgust they already feel toward the IRS and think "government bad, must have less government."
This is an example why I work hard to avoid becoming ideological or partisan in my political thinking. It so often is just a poor substitute for actually trying to solve problems and make things better. It becomes a lever that politicians can use against us to make us angry and motivated to support them against their opposition. It is a tool talking heads on cable news, columnists and other pundits can use to get more viewers and clicks so that they can make their living or even become rich telling us to hate the other side.
That doesn't mean that I lack political leanings or ignore party and political ideology. I just try hard to avoid committing to an ideology or party as part of my identity. Hopefully, that will keep me from the kind of tribalism that has defined U.S. politics more and more over the last few decades.
Wow, is this a hit piece? The legislation just passed in August. Don't you think this article should be written a year from now with the information from 2023. There's no critical thinking anymore, is there? You clearly have an agenda...and it isn't getting to the truth. Propaganda piece here that is trying to cloud the truth, as usual. It's probably true that the poorer tax payers were gone after in this year that just finished 2022. But duh, perhaps that's why the legislation was passed four months ago. Do you think the stats change that quick? You know they don't, so this whole thing is a waste of time and it's intent is to spread misinformation and to piss people off. Good on you!!!
A few months back (aug 2022) Thomas Massie sent out a video showing the training of a new flock of IRS armed enforcers, and pointed out that the "target" was a small-business owner (landscaper, IIRC) suspected of fraudulently claiming his pickup truck as a valid business expense so they send 10 armed agents to swarm him and take him down outside his "office".
I sent that to a discussion group I was in at the time, and got pushback from one of the liberals in the group who argued "ummm...it's a training scenario -- not real life.."
I wrote back:
Of course it's a training scenario, that's entirely the point.
There's a saying (many variants) "The way you practice is the way you will play."
We've been told by Pres. Biden that the 87,000 new IRS agents will be sent after billionaires not paying their "fair share" (still no one has ever provided a definition for "fair share" that would apply to everyone in concrete terms--the usual mishmash received boils down to "I'd like to pay less, but other people should pay more".)
But the agents in the field are being trained to go after small businessmen who improperly deducted a work vehicle? Or, more specifically, as the video explains "Could not provide a source for the money used to purchase the vehicle". If that's what they're being trained for, that's what they are expected to be doing. See, they weren't being trained to approach a billionaire's megayacht and deal with the private security people and lawyers.
It's a fantasy to think that the new agents will be limited to targeting billionaires, or even millionaires. It's the same reason why all transactions (totaling) over $600 must be tracked and reported. People selling beanie babies on ebay will be reported to the IRS, and can expect to be audited. Those people are probably not millioniares or billionaires. Also, the $600 rules came with increased emphasis on unreported tip earnings. So the IRS will be going after small employers who fail to "Keep [and report] a daily tip record using Form 4070A, Employee’s Daily Record of Tips" and/or fail to "Report all tips on an individual income tax return, Form 4137, Social Security and Medicare Tax on Unreported Tip Income". Wait staff earning cash tips cheat on their taxes to the tune of about $20-30B each year, and the IRS has been unhappy with their ability to go after these people due to lack of resources. 87,000 new agents will certainly give them some new resources.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for going after tax cheats big or small. The EITC program is one glaring example of an area where enforcement should be better. Where the government *knows* that about 25% of all EITC payments are made incorrectly, either through "honest" errors or through outright fraud cost about $20B each year. And that's down markedly from about 1/3 of all such claims being wrongfully paid after the IRS began requiring an SSN for each child claimed (a rule that was branded "racist" when it was originally put in place). And if a single mom who works a double shift at some diner doesn't think to report her cash tips to the IRS, well, she should know better and will deserve it when the armed agents kick in her door.
I also am pretty sure that millionaires and billionaires have lawyers and tax specialists employed to make sure that they employ every legal strategy available in order to reduce their tax bills to the minimum required by law (or as close to it as they can come), and that most of the time, auditing them just enriches the lawyers.
But in those cases, another saying comes to bear "the process is the punishment", because I also believe that agents will 100% go after people that they know haven't done anything wrong.
Re: "the process is the punishment..."
Myself, I've been audited twice.
The first time was because my wife had started with a new company that mistakenly withheld Colorado (where the corporate HQ was) instead of our local state taxes (where she actually worked), which went unnoticed for about 3 months. We told them about the mistake, and they corrected it. But come tax time, the employer compounded the error by reporting her income for those 3 months twice. From the IRS point-of-view, we improperly excluded some $45K from our taxes (or about $10K in taxes not paid) Fortunately, we had support from the employer in claiming responsibility for the error, had all the records supporting the error and showing how the math exactly accounted for every cent the IRS was after, and were ultimately able to demonstrate to the IRS's satisfaction that *we* had done nothing wrong, that we had not in fact been paid twice, and owed nothing additional. But getting that agreement from the IRS took about 6 months of back and forth with auditors, and a stack of paper a full 1 inch high.
A year after that, we got a 2nd audit notice. This one claimed that we had not paid FICA taxes and income tax surcharges on some $45K. That's right. We got audited twice for the same issue. This one was a bit easier. I sent the IRS a copy of the whole previous audit (cost like $8 to mail certified as it was a very large envelope) and their own notice of compliance, along with pointing out that the unpaid FICA taxes and surcharges were exactly the FICA amount to be paid on the twice-reported monies. Eventually they agreed.
So when they say "the process is the punishment", I get where they're coming from. At the time, though, I had no idea that there might be armed IRS agents twitching to kick in my door.
In other news
"According to a report released by the Government Accountability Office in 2018, the IRS has been stockpiling ammunition and weapons for years. As of 2018, the agency had 4,487 firearms and 5,062,006 rounds of ammunition in its inventory, the report said. The IRS purchased more than $700,000 in ammunition in recent days.
There are people who are of the opinion that this is part of the Administration's larger trend to “have any entity in the federal government buy up ammo to reduce the amount of ammunition that is in supply, while at the same time, making it harder to produce ammo.” Especially when the federally-owned ammunition plant in Missouri has been banned by the Biden administration from selling surplus ammunition to the public. Previously, the military had been banned from selling used brass cartridges from their firing ranges to the public, since people can clean and reload the brass. The military brass is now paying to have the military's brass collected, compacted (rendering is useless for reloading), and hauled away for metal recycling.
Back to the IRS, that branch of the IRS has just over 2000 special agents (so about 2.5 firearms per agent), who must comply with requirements (per the website and report 2021_Annual_Report.pdf (irs.gov))
Major Duties
Adhere to the highest standards of conduct, especially in maintaining honesty and integrity.
Work a minimum of 50 hours per week, which may include irregular hours, and be on-call 24/7, including holidays and weekends.
Maintain a level of fitness necessary to effectively respond to life-threatening situations on the job.
Carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force, if necessary.
Be willing and able to participate in arrests, execution of search warrants, and other dangerous assignments.
Forbes has been keeping tabs on this division for many years, and notes that in one 2-year period, agents had accidental discharges 11 times--which was more times than they fired their weapons intentionally in the field. Their arsenal includes fully automatic weapons. One might be forced to wonder: why does the IRS need this level of firepower when the Treasury Department already includes the Secret Service? And when the agency could tap the FBI or US Marshals Service, ATF, or DEA as may be most applicable to their target's proclivities?
Some of these go back to the Obama years.
The Gun-Toting IRS (forbes.com)
The Statutory Problem With IRS Firearms (forbes.com)
IRS Has 4,500 Guns, 5 Million Rounds Ammunition: Paying Taxes? (forbes.com)
Why Are Federal Bureaucrats Buying Guns And Ammo? $158 Million Spent By Non-Military Agencies (forbes.com)
As for the IRS, one might see that *perhaps* there is some need for armed IRS agents. But armed Department of Education agents? Armed FDA agents? Armed USDA agents?
Add the U.S. Department of Education to the list of federal agencies that can invade your home at gunpoint and hold you and your family in custody for hours.
Kenneth Wright learned this the hard way last week, when federal "education" agents busted down the front door of his Stockton, Calif., home at 6 in the morning.
"They surrounded the house; it was like a task force or SWAT team," a neighbor told a national news affiliate. "They all had guns. They dragged him out in his boxer shorts, threw him to the ground and handcuffed him."
Wright's terrified children -- ages 3, 9 and 11 -- were forced to sit in a patrol car for two hours. Wright himself was in custody for six hours. "I felt really bad for those kids," a neighbor said.
Federal agents for the Education Department's inspector general executed a very broad search warrant and seized paperwork and a personal computer. Wright says the law enforcement agents -- who reportedly included 13 with the Education Department and one or two Stockton police officers -- told him they were investigating his estranged wife's use of federal aid for students. But she doesn't even live in his house.
A federal spokesman tried to distance the Education Department from the raid by emphasizing that the IG runs a "semi-independent office." But that begs the question of why a federal agency overseeing education policy should have an IG who can send agents armed with guns into Americans' homes. Or why the department has SWAT-style teams of agents to begin with.
[...]
But the list includes dozens of federal agencies with no business training and fielding armed officers. Who wants early-morning armed break-ins by the Department of Agriculture, Railroad Retirement Board, Bureau of Land Management, Tennessee Valley Authority, Office of Personnel Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
From Forbes again:
What’s curious, however, is that traditionally administrative agencies spent more than $20 million. Four notable examples:
1) The 2,300 Special Agents at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are allowed to carry AR-15’s, P90 tactical rifles, and other heavy weaponry. Recently, the IRS armed up with $1.2 million in new ammunition. This was in addition to the $11 million procurement of guns, ammunition, and military-style equipment procured between 2006-2014.
2) The Small Business Administration (SBA) spent tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars to load its gun locker with Glocks last year. The SBA wasn’t alone – the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service modified their Glocks with silencers.
3) The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has a relatively new police force. In 1996, the VA had zero employees with arrest and firearm authority. Today, the VA has 3,700 officers, armed with millions of dollars’ worth of guns and ammunition including AR-15's, Sig Sauer handguns, and semi-automatic pistols.
4) Meanwhile, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) agents carry the same sophisticated weapons platforms used by our Special Forces military warriors. The HHS gun locker is housed in a new “National Training Operations Center” – a facility at an undisclosed location within the DC beltway.
Spending on guns and ammo at 58 non-military federal agencies – including 40 regulatory, administrative agencies – amounted to $158 million.
The continued growth of the federal arsenal begs the question: Just whom are the feds planning to battle?
More examples of agencies amassing firepower over the last two years:
Loading the Gun Locker – Federal agencies spent $44 million on guns, including an “urgent” order for 20 M-16 Rifles with extra magazines at the Department of Energy ($49,559); shotguns and Glock pistols at the General Services Administration ($16,568); and a bulk order of pistols, sights, and accessories by the Bureau of Reclamation whose main job is to build dams, power plants, and canals ($697,182).
Buying Bullets in Bulk – The government spent $114 million on ammunition, including bulk purchases by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ($66,927); the Smithsonian ($42,687); and the Railroad Retirement Board ($6,941). The Social Security Administration spent $61,129 on bullets including 50,000 rounds of ammunition plus 12-gauge buckshot and slug ammo.
The EPA special agents purchased ammunition for their .357 and 9mm revolvers and buckshot for their shotguns. While Bernie Sanders claimed that the biggest adversary to the United States was climate change, the EPA stood ready to fight in ways we couldn’t have imagined.
Hollow-Point Bullets – Despite being outlawed by the Geneva Convention, federal agencies spent $426,268 on hollow-point bullets, including orders from the Forest Service, National Park Service, Office of Inspector General, Bureau of Fiscal Service, as well as Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Marshals, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Hollow-point bullets are not outlawed by any Geneva Convention.
One of the Hague Conventions of 1899 bans the use of hollow-point bullets in warfare between parties to the convention. Hollow-point bullets are legal under any other circumstance. As the United States is not a party to that convention, the United States is allowed to use hollow-point bullets in war, and everyone, including parties to that convention, are allowed to use hollow-point bullets in wars against the United States.
Well, it was Forbes, so there's that.
Are they really going after the lowest income tax payers? My sense this is far less about going after someone making $20k a year, and more about going after the tax preperation store that is willing to run the scam on the Earned Income Tax Credit or the Child Tax Credit and split the proceeds 50-50 with the tax payer. I grew up with a guy in Texas. Seems like that is the central feature of his wife's and his multi million dollar a year chain of tax prep stores.
And yet again a Reason "associate editor" falls for TRAC's hoary old line of bullshit.
These people having their EITC claims being correspondence-audited are not taxpayers. They are recipients of taxpayer money from a welfare program administered by the IRS. Free taxpayer money attracts scammers. It would be gross dereliction of duty to actual taxpayers send the checks out in cases where there are signs of fraud, rather than demanding further documentation to weed out welfare cheats.
You ever find that missing trillion dollars in taxpayer funds from the Pentagon, Chaim? Sure is a coincidence that office got hit by a missile the next day... I mean a plane. It was totally a plane.
All while Israelis danced and filmed it all...
Why don’t you fuck off back to Stormfront, you fucking Nazi?
Well stated DRM, Tax PAYERS vs. tax FILERS.
The Israeli Revenue Service will always get their shekel from their goyim slaves. The rich already serve; the poor must be made to kneel.
For the same reason that there are more cop cars in slums than gated communities, it's not because the rich people bought off the cops, but because the poor people are doing more crimes.
I’d like to see the audit rates of the by income for SELF PREPARED RETURNS. That is, I have a hunch that self prepared returns are audited far higher than others, regardless of income. And that, maybe, THAT rate is more … errr …, equitable.
And, in a fit of complete cynicism, I'd wonder if there might be some ... off the book incentives for IRS employees to not audit Intuit / Tax Cut / Big Tax Return prepared returns.
Good tax preparers have models and rules for what triggers IRS audits. That is, they will give clients a choice: "you can take this deduction, but it will likely trigger an audit". I always opt not to take it and avoid the audit. I suspect most people do.
For middle income & poor people, it costs less to pay the IRS' extortion than to fight it (even if they win).
Of course they pick on the lower socioeconomic among us, that's what all fascist bullies do. God forbid they pick on the upper income earners who could crush them like a zit.
> Though some libertarians* may argue such an agency ought not to exist in the first place and cheer its relative ineptitude at going after the well-to-do
* psychopaths, shitheads, and racists
Thanks for sharing these awesome blog posts. Welcome to our professional services and order an original paper different from the sample.we also offer writing services on rubrics and spirals.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.RICHAPP2.com