Wealthy Connecticut Residents Received Millions in Federal Dollars After Hurricane Sandy
It shouldn't be the federal government's responsibility to protect wealthy homeowners from the inevitable.

After the devastation caused by Hurricane Sandy in 2012, Congress apportioned over $50 billion for disaster relief. Among that total was $16 billion for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)'s Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery program (CDBG-DR). The state of Connecticut received $159 million.
CDBG-DR is intended primarily to help people with lower incomes respond to disasters. But a new Politico investigation reveals that as low-income areas in Connecticut remained in disrepair after the storm, generous reimbursements and low-interest loans went to wealthy homeowners who, on paper, should not have even qualified.
In Bridgeport, which has a median household income of just over half the state average, 25 homeowners received $1.7 million toward home repairs, but the still-unrepaired damage to Bridgeport homes is estimated at over $1.1 million.
Meanwhile, in tony towns like Darien and Greenwich, Politico found 62 households that received five- and six-figure grants for repairs on homes worth $1 million or more. Those homeowners collectively received $6.2 million in aid, around 15 percent of the $44 million distributed for home repairs.
In some cases, homeowners made repairs with their own money and received the grants months later. Even if they did not have the cash on hand, they were not without means: Of the 62 households, half borrowed against their home equity to fund repairs, an option not available to renters or those who don't have considerable equity.
One Greenwich household got $100,000 by refinancing the mortgage, and a family member cashed in airline miles in order to put them up in a Hyatt Regency after the storm hit. But in addition to an insurance payout, that same family also borrowed $87,000 in disaster loans from the Small Business Administration and received $30,000 in disaster aid from the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Then nearly two years after the repairs were completed, the family received $92,000 in disaster relief funds. Another homeowner told Politico that he received $150,000, the maximum, after repairs were completed on his $2.6 million home.
One of the Greenwich homeowners told Politico that although the family spent over $150,000 out-of-pocket to rebuild, the extra money allowed them to invest in upgrades and raise the home's value. In fact, of the 62 households, 21 have sold their homes since repairs were completed, for an average sale price of $1.77 million.
On one hand, generous benefit programs like the one detailed by Politico are ripe for abuse, and it's unfortunately no surprise that the wealthy and well-connected got a sizable chunk of the funds. But federal relief programs also promote poor incentives that exacerbate the harm from natural disasters.
The Politico article claims, "HUD disaster aid has become more vital as climate change intensifies storms, floods and wildfires." In fact, disaster aid programs actually incentivize people to live in unsafe areas. Since 1968, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) has subsidized flood insurance in areas at higher risk for flooding, where the private insurance market would otherwise dare not go. As a result, more people moved to flood- and hurricane-prone areas as the cost of living is artificially lower than if the market were allowed to determine the proper level of risk.
The properties that the NFIP insures tend to be of higher value than the national average. Additionally, a significant number are not primary residences, implying second homes and vacation properties.
The Greenwich family quoted in Politico experienced a genuine hardship, but they also had the means to recover without federal aid. If wealthy homeowners want to live in places likely to experience severe weather events, they're free to do so, but it shouldn't be the federal government's responsibility to help protect them against the consequences.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But think of all the construction work this creates for
illegal aliensimmigrants!Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.WORKSCLICK.COM
Too funny.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I believe Stossel covered this many years ago.
How much money do poor people contribute to political campaigns? And how much money do rich people contribute to political campaigns? Money is just a form of speech and it speaks the loudest.
How much do poor people pay in net taxes? Nothing.
In fact, until you reach the top 20% of income earners, Americans don't pay net federal taxes.
That's why it is perhaps not unreasonable that the top 20% of income earners get something for the money they pay.
It was never about helping... It has always been about buying...
Can't have a National Sozialist(Nazi)-Empire without buying all the State's first.
Government, the giant nipple in the sky.
Soooo pay more taxes for working harder and taking risk so when disaster hits fu? Besides CTs coffers can't take the hit right now. Follow the money trail - disproportionate hurricane assistance, property taxes, payments to underfunded retirement funds. If state restructuring is out of the question the money has to come from somewhere....
"It shouldn't be the federal government's responsibility to protect wealthy homeowners from the inevitable."
It shouldn't be the federal government's responsibility to protect any homeowners from the inevitable. FIFY
“It shouldn’t be the federal government’s responsibility to protect any homeowners from the inevitable. FIFY”
Exactly. If someone can’t afford decent insurance, maybe they shouldn’t purchase a house they can’t afford to insure. Maybe consider a less-expensive house or not one in a high-risk area? I think that’s called “common sense.”
If they don’t have the "common sense" to insure their own investment for its full value, well, why should the taxpayer be held accountable for their stupidity?
"full value" also meaning "replacement value."
The SBA's Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was established to provide financial help to small businesses affected by the coronavirus. The program was intended to provide businesses with the necessary funds to keep their employees on the payroll, pay their rent and utilities, and otherwise keep their businesses afloat until the crisis ends.
However, some wealthy and well-connected Connecticut businesses and individuals were able to receive large sums of money through the PPP. According to data released by the SBA, some of Connecticut's wealthiest people, including hedge fund managers, real estate developers, and venture capitalists, received millions of dollars in PPP aid.
You'd think everyone would be rushing to sell their coastal mansions cheap, since they will be underwater in a few years.
It shouldn't be the federal government's responsibility to protect wealthy homeowners from the inevitable.
it is not and never should be. Government are NOT oir Daddies. Nor our insurance companies.
On the other hand, government have REFUSED to do things like end the rioting, remove the unjustified and unscientific covid mandates, conduct accurate trials on the new injections they "fast tracked" to failure.... and government are REFUSING to deal with one of the few and specific charges put upon FedGov and PROTECT US FROM FOREIGH INVASION.
How hard is it to type with that tinfoil hat falling down over your eyes?
That's the progressive/socialist position.
The libertarian position, for your reference, is:
It shouldn't be the federal government's responsibility to protect any homeowners from the inevitable.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Salaryapp1.com