California Bill Would Exempt Church-Sponsored Housing Projects From Hellish Zoning Laws
S.B. 4 would let religious institutions and nonprofit colleges skip the typical environmental review and red tape when building low-income housing on their property.

From shelters to soup kitchens, zoning laws often outlaw churches and religious nonprofits from carrying out their charitable missions on land they own. A new bill in California could make their lives a little easier by allowing them to build housing on their properties without all the usual red tape.
"California has a deep housing shortage, and we need every available tool to create the housing we so desperately need," said state Sen. Scott Wiener (D–Calif.). "Let's make it easier for these nonprofits to build these critically needed homes."
Wiener is the author of S.B. 4, which would allow religious institutions and nonprofit colleges to build affordable housing complexes on their property, regardless of local zoning laws and density restrictions.
The bill would prevent cities from using long and discretionary approval processes to block or delay these projects. NIMBY (not in my backyard) neighbors wouldn't be able to stop them by filing endless environmental lawsuits.
Wiener introduced the same bill in 2020. It passed unanimously in the state senate but was never brought up for a vote in the assembly.
The last version of S.B. 4 doesn't authorize churches to go on a development free-for-all.
The bill includes density restrictions that would limit new housing projects to somewhere between 15 and 40 units per acre.
This new housing would have to be provided to low-income renters at below market rates—effectively requiring them to be government-subsidized projects. Religious builders would also have to pay construction workers prevailing (union) wages. That raises construction costs.
The organization representing the carpenters' unions (who have a storied history of blocking housing development) has endorsed the bill.
That's all still directionally less regulation on churches and nonprofit colleges getting into the housing game. Often their efforts are stopped by rules both byzantine and bizarre.
When Clairemont Lutheran Church in San Diego wanted to redevelop its fellowship hall into affordable housing, local planning officials told them no dice. At the time, city rules required a certain number of parking spaces per inch of pew space. Because Clairemont Lutheran's plans required eliminating some of those required parking spaces, they weren't allowed to move forward.
"Two weeks of the year that parking lot is utilized to the full extent. 50 weeks of the year it's not," Eddie McCoven, a spokesperson for the Clairemont Lutheran Church, told Reason back in 2020.
When a church in Palo Alto wanted to convert its underutilized parking lot for a "safe parking" site where people could sleep in their cars overnight, it took them two years and lots of negotiations with the neighbors in order to get approval.
Over the past couple of years, a series of "Yes in God's Backyard" bills have chipped away at some of the rules facing churches wanting to build housing. In 2020 and 2022, the California Legislature passed two laws that scale back parking requirements for religious-sponsored development.
Earlier this year, the legislature also passed a new law that allows housing development in commercial-zoned areas.
S.B. 4 goes much further by allowing these projects to be built in most zoning districts and exempting them from the normal delaying processes. It doesn't completely liberate good Samaritans but does at least ease restrictions on their goodwill.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> WWW.RICHSALARY.COM
This is a direct assault on everything California stands for. I'm outraged.
"This is a direct assault on everything California stands for."
I'm cheering.
Not if the houses have all electric appliances.
I really have made $30,100 while not an uncertainty in about a month and a half decisively working part-time from my loft. Straightforwardly, at the same time as my (hvr-05) last business, I became depleted and luckily I pursued a choice on this high web-based task and with this I’m in a situation to get thousands promptly through my home.
HERE====)>OPEN>> ONLINEUSAJOBES
I wonder what qualifies as "low income housing" in San Francisco? How about mere $1M houses?
A van down by the river.
A van down by the river.
Replace "river" with "creek" (we don't do those river-thingies in CA), and this is actually not a joke in any way.
Soon only electric vans will be allowed down by the creek.
Could a church set up apartments for middle-income and working-class people and charge them reasonable rent?
Not unless they want to go broke.
From shelters to soup kitchens, zoning laws often outlaw churches and religious nonprofits from carrying out their charitable missions on land they own. A new bill in California could make their lives a little easier by allowing
themeveryone, whether religious or not, whether for-profit or non-prophet, to build housing on their properties without all the usual red tape."California has a deep housing shortage, and we need every available tool to create the housing we so desperately need," said state Sen. Scott Wiener (D–Calif.). "Let's make it easier for
these nonprofitseveryone, whether religious or non-religious, whether for-profit or non-profit, to build these critically needed homes."Fixed That For Ya!
Basic rights don't become privileges unless they are violated for some and not others.
Now, everything is a privilege, with religion demanding that it have more privileges based on "sincerely-held belief." (Small wonder that 1/3rd of U.S. Citizens--and growing--identify as "None" when questionaires about religion arise.)
If people demanded Equal Rights and Justice For All rather than just a privilege for their own clique, we'd be much closer to an ideal free society and it's attendant prosperity.
Seems to me that "every available tool" would start with 'void all the zoning laws that caused the problem in the first place'. Stop tinkering around the edges and just give people their freedom back.
It's amazing how simple "liberty" makes things. Every abridgement of liberty adds the need for more abridgements to enforce or fine tune the previous abridgements.
Someone had an example of a law from, I think, the 1920s, making it a separate crime for a traveler to defraud an innkeeper, except that wasn't specific enough, and it ended up with a couple dozen synonyms like "motor lodge", and I wonder how many criminals got off because they had robbed some establishment which thought it clever for describing itself uniquely, like "motel".
My immediate reaction was "I wonder how how long it will take for developers to partner with churches to take advantage of this?"
I envision this working like Indian casinos. They seem to pop up everywhere with only the most tenuous connections to historic tribal lands.
Don't get me wrong, I think that would be fabulous. Anything which subverts housing regulation is great, as far as I'm concerned.
It looks like the construction unions already "partnered" with some legislators on this bill.
The day after this goes into effect, a developer will file suit demanding equal protection.
And lose.
Yep, and all because he doesn't have a Jesus Fish on his van.
I don't know about the California assembly or the governor - who haven't weighed in yet - but the California Senate seems willing to grant special religious privileges by law.
I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is where i started……………>>> onlinecareer1
I wonder how many votes the unions promised Wiener and how many fewer units will get built because of the requirement for using the most costly, rather than the most cost effective, labor.
And how, exactly, does the statement
“Let’s make it easier for these nonprofits to build these critically needed homes.”
square with requiring that “these critically needed homes” be built using the most costly labor rather than the most cost effective labor?
Perhaps Wiener meant to say
“Let’s make building these critically needed homes yield the maximum possible votes for Democratic candidates.”
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks (igj-08) online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM