Puerto Rico Inches Toward Self-Determination
"At this point, it is pretty much a fact that Puerto Rico is a colony of the United States," says one observer.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D–Ariz.), chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources, was pissed.
The prominent progressive had just left a July 26 committee meeting on the Puerto Rico Status Act, a legislative compromise negotiated by the territory's nonvoting House member, Rep. Jenniffer González-Colón of the New Progressive Party (PNP). The bill would allow Puerto Rico to conduct a binding referendum on the island's status.
It was supposed to be a momentous day for Grijalva, a longtime supporter of Puerto Rican statehood. Instead, he and the bill's other backers were handed a surprising defeat. Although Grijalva's committee had approved the bill earlier that week, it was stalled by amendments, keeping it from advancing before the end of the summer session. His fellow progressives were to blame.
Reps. Chuy García (D–Ill.) and Rashida Tlaib (D–Mich.) joined Republicans on the committee to keep the bill from reaching the House floor. "Puerto Ricans deserve a formal and accessible legislative hearing on a bill of such importance wherein members of the Puerto Rican community and interested stakeholders have an opportunity to contribute their perspectives," García tweeted after the markup, echoing the demands of some diaspora activists for a longer legislative runway leading to a vote for self-determination.
With the recess approaching, Grijalva worried that the delay would kill the bill's momentum, leaving Puerto Rico's status unchanged and critical issues affecting the island unresolved. "This isn't about process." he told Pablo Manríquez, a reporter for the digital media outlet Latino Rebels. "It's about protecting the status quo."
Months later, nothing had changed, and the situation on the island remained troubling. Despite its attractively low tax rate, Puerto Rico has struggled under its current leadership, and its relationship with the federal government has deteriorated. Five years after Hurricane Maria devastated the island, the commonwealth's government is still working to rebuild and to pay off its overwhelming public debt. Officials at all levels of Puerto Rico's government are facing corruption charges amid a massive federal crackdown.
For many, the territory's challenges have only reinforced its second-class status. "At this point, it is pretty much a fact that Puerto Rico is a colony of the United States," says Joaquin Villanueva, a geography professor at Gustavus Adolphus College and the author of a forthcoming book on Puerto Rico's debt crisis.
How to end that colonial status has dominated island politics for the last two centuries. Politicians from Puerto Rico's two major political parties, the PNP and the Popular Democratic Party (PPD), have caucused nationally with both Democrats and Republicans. The PNP is more of a big tent than the PPD, which skews more Democratic. The main issue that separates them is statehood.
New Progressives like González favor statehood. Populars favor remaining a commonwealth, although some support increased autonomy and a "free compact" agreement with the United States, similar to what Micronesia currently enjoys. A smaller party, the Puerto Rico Independence Party, backs total independence, although it never enjoys enough support to shape the debate.
The PNP has seen its momentum stall recently amid corruption scandals, causing the party's vote shares to decline during the last few election cycles. Experts on Puerto Rican politics believe statehood nevertheless would prevail in a referendum, given the movement's growth during the last three decades. "In Puerto Rico, the statehood movement grows organically, despite the [PNP]," says Bloomfield College historian Harry Franqui-Rivera. In a nonbinding 2020 referendum, the most recent of six such ballot questions since 1967, about 53 percent of voters favored statehood.
But that means nothing without federal backing. Historically, Congress has ignored statehood referendums. Yet experts believe a binding vote is possible now, given Puerto Rico's diminishing role in U.S. military strategy. "The military bases are gone," says Antonio Sotomayor, a historian at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, "and that might be [enough] for the military to say, 'We don't care. It's up to Congress.'"
Gonzalez's bill would offer Puerto Ricans three options: independence, statehood, or free association, which would grant Puerto Rico the ability to conduct its own foreign affairs and fully govern its internal affairs, while still relying on the U.S. for military defense. Many Republicans and the PPD oppose any referendum that excludes the option of remaining a commonwealth. But González and her congressional allies emphatically reject that approach. "A real decolonization process cannot include an option to stay a colony," González tweeted in June.
Some Republicans worry that Puerto Rican statehood would give Democrats two safe seats in the Senate. But unlike in the District of Columbia, another statehood candidate that overwhelmingly votes Democratic, electoral politics in Puerto Rico would be competitive. González, elected in a territorywide vote, caucuses with Republicans. Many of the island's recent governors also have caucused with Republicans and backed Republican presidential candidates, including former President Donald Trump.
Opposition in Congress also comes from the left. Reps. Nydia Velázquez (D–N.Y.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.), both Puerto Rican, are the main backers of the Puerto Rico Self-Determination Act, a bill supported by diaspora activists and by progressives like Garcia and Tlaib. The bill would create a commission charged with designing self-determination options in conjunction with a constituent assembly elected by Puerto Rican residents.
Villanueva believes a constituent assembly would better represent voices often ignored in status conversations. "You have a group of politicians and economic elites that have traditionally made decisions on behalf of the people," he explains. "So the poor, the marginalized, racially subjugated folks, the ones that live in public housing or marginalized communities—we seldom hear them." He also sees a constituent assembly as a way to include the diaspora in the process.
Critics think the bill gives Puerto Ricans too little say in the island's self-determination and Congress too many avenues to sabotage the process. They also note a certain paternalism among diaspora politicians living in the United States. "A lot of people in the diaspora who I've been in conversation with," Franqui-Rivera says, "tell me, 'Oh, Puerto Ricans don't know that they're colonized.' Are you kidding me? They live there."
That tension spills over into the question of who should participate in a status debate. More than 6 million Puerto Ricans live on the mainland, nearly double the number of Puerto Ricans on the island. Many in the diaspora want to vote in a status referendum, while some on the island oppose their participation. A recent survey found that 62 percent of Puerto Ricans in the U.S. support statehood.
The issue also raises important questions about the future of Puerto Rican culture and how the island can preserve its identity if it becomes a state. The commonwealth, for example, has its own Olympic committee and sends a delegation to the events. The games and recent Puerto Rican wins there have fueled national pride, making the Olympics a salient point that statehood advocates must contend with.
"Some say we don't need that kind of pageantry, that we need rice and beans on our table," Sotomayor says. "But for so many people, spiritually, the way that national identity works, that's what they need. It provides something to feel good about, and that should not be underestimated in the decolonization conversation."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Tremendo imbécil que eres, comunista.
You wear “progressive” like a God-given defining trait, completely inimical to San Ignatius of Loyola. News flash: liberation theology has been rejected and denounced by the Vatican for decades, so burn your Che Guevara t-shirt
Move to PR and get a flavor of what Boricuas say about each other. They call each other “mantengo” which means “welfare parasite”. The divisions within PR, ripe with Marxists (e.g. former mayor of San Juan) to far right whack jobs (e.g. former Bishop of Arecibo, who was just removed by the Vatican) are as common as poverty in Caguas and Juncos to wealth in Guaynabo and Condado.
Give Puerto Rico what they have demanded for decades: independence. They will figure it out considering they were doing just fine before we got involved. Sure, the USA used them just like they used the USA. But the damage to them as a consequence of el mantengo is a blight to the beautiful culture, history and sabor that typifies la isla del encanto
TL;DR: get to know Puerto Rico by living there before spouting your “progressive” claptrap. St Ignatius of Loyola would have expected as much
As long as independence doesn’t involve US foreign aid, or any other kind of US financial assistance, I’m ok with their independence. However, my guess is that every version of such a thing will involve US tax dollars going to PR forever.
Hopefully people understand the difference between a colony and a territory. Oregon and Nevada were territories. They opted for statehood.
Puerto Rico should get to vote to decide if they want to be independent, or to apply for statehood. I have a feeling which one would work out better for them, but it's their call to make.
^ This.
Screw that. Cut them off immediately and revoke all citizenships for anyone who didn’t move to the mainland before Hurricane Maria.
We don’t need them and they have been leaches for decades. Gone are the days of many noble Puerto Ricans serving in the military; their numbers are diminished. Gone are the days of many entrepreneurs from Puerto Rico coming to the US and starting businesses.
Now they come only to take advantage of the welfare system and live in insular Spanish-speaking enclaves where they don’t assimilate or contribute to the US.
Cut them off.
Boricuas on the island have little love for those who left PR (Diaspora). They call them cowards and traitors. You arrogate more power to them than the Boricuas on the island, comemierda. no sabes nada
Full independence.
Make them a state?
Think of the star we'd need to add to all of our flags! No way!
I bet big flag is lobbying hard for this.
Not necessary. We could kick another state out. Texas would probably go voluntarily.
We can keep the states and just kick the democrats out. Forever.
Nah, Toss Delaware. No need for Wilmington to have two Senators and all.
Hell, we could reduce New England to 2 states with the tiniest sliver of effort.
Sounds good to me. Just add enough states to keep it at 50, so we don’t need to redo the flag.
Because we have never done that before.
51 is a prime number so no way it works. And politically it would be hard to get enough Repubs to let in a likely Dem state. So let California split into two states and go with 52. That's 4 rows of 7 stars and 4 rows of 6 stars.
Better yet, offer Cuba the chance to be the 52nd state, if they accept the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, abandon communism, and arrest and prosecute their current leadership.
51 is not a prime number: 3 rows of 17 stars.
Math is racist.
51 stars in a random mess.
13 is prime and we worked that out OK. Being prime doesn't matter because we don't need to use factors to lay out the flag, the current flag is 5 rows of 6 stars alternated with 4 rows of 5 stars, so there are endless options of how to lay out 51.
It's easy, 3 rows of 9 alternating with 3 rows of 8 = 51. It's no more complex than the current 5 rows of 6 alternating with 4 rows of 5 = 50.
There were three different flag arrangements when I was in Kindergarten and 1st grade. First, 48 stars (6 by 8) in 1958, as it had been since Arizona achieved statehood in 1912. Alaska became a state in January 1959, so on July 4, 1959, the 49 star flag became official (7 by 7 stars; the rows were offset and staggered to fit in the same rectangle as the 6 by 8 pattern). Then Hawaii voted for statehood in August, so the 49 stars were replaced with the current 50 star pattern after exactly one year.
It wasn't necessary to replace the old flags right away. I remember 48 and 49 star flags in my 5th and 6th grade classrooms, in 1963-65.
The starry banner iv freedom is already designed, a circular galaxy iv stars that will still look no differ'nt from Hoya carnosa to Chinese eyes.
Big Flag would love it, think of all the flags they'd sell because everyone would have to replace the perfectly good ones they already have.
About one third of those living and working on the island work for some government agency or other. If one adds in those receiving welfare, more than half of the population depends on the government for a living. Self interest virtually guarantees a solid Democrat vote.
They deserve their independence from the chains of federal welfare.
Let them go.
Independence will destroy the island.
At most it would destroy the political ruling class. The people and the island will survive just fine if the politicos vanish.
I admire your optimism.
More likely just shift the aid corruption to foreign aid corruption.
And just think of all the graft available from the UN if they are a "nation"!
Puerto Rico could join all those red states which take in government freebies more than they pay in taxes.
Right on cue with the talking point.
Those fifty cents aren’t gonna earn themselves.
Could be raised the 51 cents. But then Puerto Ricans would be in a real state!
Or 51 intelligence experts?
At least until reparations, right?
Bear in mind that Cuba is still a colony of the same "former" Soviet Union whose current KGB puppet-for-life daily does to Ukraine what the Third Reich did to Poland and Czechoslovakia, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Algiers, Sweden, Norway, The Netherlands, Lithuania... There's the crool hand iv arnichy forgin' man'cles f'r their limbs, by Dad!
"Gonzalez's bill would offer Puerto Ricans three options: independence, statehood, or free association, which would grant Puerto Rico the ability to conduct its own foreign affairs and fully govern its internal affairs, while still relying on the U.S. for military defense."
What's the monthly fee for "protection"?
Hey, nice island ya gots here…..
We pay them $100 billion per year. That’s how protection works with the federal government. Of course, members of congress will be wetting their beaks.
"That tension spills over into the question of who should participate in a status debate. More than 6 million Puerto Ricans live on the mainland, nearly double the number of Puerto Ricans on the island. Many in the diaspora want to vote in a status referendum, while some on the island oppose their participation."
I assume those in the US who want to vote will relocate to PR, no matter the outcome.
I should be allowed to vote in Scottish elections.
I used to live in Indiana, can I vote in their elections?
Are you an Indian?
Only if you are a democrat.
The ones who live on the mainland may be Puerto Ricans but they're not residents of Purti Rico nor subject to it's laws.
So they get the same day as the people who live around them.
But what if they like to be in America?
The moment the authentic texts of Puerto Rico's laws are in the language of the Constitution of the United States, and their court proceedings are held in the language of the Constitution of the United States, and when it can be reasonably expected by a US citizen traveling in Puerto Rico that every single single cop and bureaucrat he encounters in Puerto Rico is fluent in the language of the Constitution of the United States, Puerto Rico will have reached a condition where it is fit to become one of the United States.
Until then, it can be happy with being a dependency, or ask for independence. Utterly their free choice, there; they should neither be held against their will, nor kicked out if, instead of independence, they want more time as a dependency to work on becoming fit to be a state.
But it'd simply be stupid to make them a state under the current condition of unreadiness. The United States does not need its own Quebec.
There is no requirement in the constitution that requires a prospective state to be fluent in English or any other language to be admitted to the union. In fact, we have this pesky thing called the First Amendment that requires the government not to limit ones speech and that includes which language they choose to speak in.
But speaking is not the same as being understood. You certainly have the freedom to speak any language, including what you understand while listening or reading. But the Constitution also does not guarantee that official communications will be made available to suit you.
Yes but the First Amendment was written in English so it doesn't apply to anything Spanish.
The Spanish version of it reads:
El Congreso no hará ninguna ley que limite la libertad de expresión en español. Pero a ningún ciudadano se le permite ser ciudadano mientras habla español a menos que también esté en un país extranjero.
Wasn’t it also written with those funny s’s that look like f’s? And no emojis.
So, not related to modern English, either.
What does the First Amendment have to do with the language of legislation?
1) The lack of a provision in the Constitution against doing something utterly idiotic is not a reason to do something utterly idiotic.
2) The First Amendment has no bearing in any way on whether or not it is utterly idiotic to have a state where the language of public administration is foreign to the vast majority of US citizens. And if you weren't an utter idiot yourself, you'd have noticed every single matter I brought up was one of the language of public administration.
There is no official US language.
Then go ahead, get elected, write a bill in Spanish, see how far it gets.
Like he understands multiple languages.
How do you say
"Remember the Maine."
In Boriucan?
And I never mentioned establishing one.
You essentially did.
English vocabulary tip: “essentially” is not a synonym for “in my raving imagination”.
Imposing English as an official language is an idiocy that would not resolve the underlying fact that that natural language of law and administration in Puerto Rico is Spanish. All it would do is change the particular balance of who gets screwed over harder by the underlying fact.
It is simply an utterly moronic idea to permanently and integrally incorporate a place into the United States where the natural language of law and administration is alien to that in the rest of the United States.
Because their police and bureaucrats use a different language than English. You are running in circles to say that your original comment doesn't say what it plainly says.
Clearly, native Spanish speakers are below native English speakers in the right-wing hierarchy of moral worth.
Native English speakers should be catered to. Native Spanish speakers should submit to the customs and of the native English speakers in order to be considered "real Americans".
So, the majority doesn’t rule after all?
So that’s the Jeffy plan?
The Jeffy plan includes marshal law and mandatory public performances of the Horst-Wessel-Lied.
Heck, you’d think conservatives would love a language in which every word is either male or female.
Nobody who doesn't live on the island should get to vote on this. I mean, seriously. If you used to live in Wisconsin but moved to Florida, you don't get to keep voting in Wisconsin races.
And I see no reason to take the status quo off the table. Doing so is simply a ploy to force statehood to win, since independence is not as popular.
Statehood is an irreversible move; there should be no ploys to nudge them towards it. We should just have a fair vote.
The people in PR can certainly vote for what they want. But then the people in the other states need to vote about admitting a new state.
"We should just have a fair vote."
Good luck with that.
Everybody who doesn't live in the island should be included in a vote on whether or not they'll *be allowed to stay*.
How come referendums are never about that?
How DARE you make reasonable suggestions!
Na, let the PR migrants vote in the PR election; just don't let them vote in US federal, state, or local elections. Problem solved.
"that we need rice and beans on our table," Sotomayor says."
Whoa, stereotype much Mr. Racist?
And he spoke in English!
The exact technical term for rice and beans is cristianos y moros. Puerto Ricans are keenly aware that islamofascist Iran is actually disbanding its morality police, and selling same to the República de Texas.
Being a colony is like being a slave, eh, comradista? Don't let the peasants have a real choice that would put you out of a cushy job.
Yes, that sounds like an ideologue afraid of what his electorate would choose if given the option.
Something something borders.
Hey, Reason, THIS is how you defend free speech.
Greenwald goes nuclear on the media and so-called "trust and safety experts" ordained by the Washington Post.
"Hey, Reason, THIS is how you defend free speech."
They couldn't care less.
That is a spectacular defense of free speech done in the right way - by being on offense. He hammered on the censor wannabes, backed up his arguments with facts, and he gave no quarter to any who would stop the free flow of ideas.
Apparently, Reason wants to appear "reasonable" which to them means use both sides-ism whenever possible and most importantly don't say anything that might upset tyrants.
There's a difference between being fair and objective versus being wishy-washy and acting as if you were completely above the fray.
It's high time for a catch and release program for surplus colonies acquired in the Spanish American War.
The Philippine Islands already demanded release. The result? They've got to be protected, all their rights respected, till someone the DEA likes can be elected.
Anything Grijalva supports is likely fucked up and only benefits his own pocket.
Give the island back to Spain and be done with it.
Will the Danes give back the million ounces of gold America paid for the Virgin Islands if we throw in P-R, and let AOC run for the EuroParliament?
Agreed.
Cut them off immediately and revoke all citizenships for anyone who didn’t move to the mainland before Hurricane Maria.
We don’t need them and they have been leaches for decades. Gone are the days of many noble Puerto Ricans serving in the military; their numbers are diminished. Gone are the days of many entrepreneurs from Puerto Rico coming to the US and starting businesses.
Now they come only to take advantage of the welfare system and live in insular Spanish-speaking enclaves where they don’t assimilate or contribute to the US.
Let them be someone else’s problem.
Two GROSS errors. 1. Mindless Econazi anti-energy policies wrecked Puerto Rico, which relied on solar panels and bird-choppers now littering the landscape. Nuclear reactors in Florida and Texas get similar hurricanes. 2. AOC, born in Queens, Nueva Jork, is not Puerto Rican. I am, and I know the difference, bruto, pendejo idiota!
Cut ém loose and let them make their own way.
NO AMERICAN AID WHAT SO EVER!
Puerto Ricans should get to vote on their status. But two suggestions:
1. Only a supermajority vote should enact change (a small majority only means about half the country wants it).
2. If the vote is for statehood, then there should also be a vote by the US electorate as to whether we want to admit Puerto Rico as a state (again requiring a supermajority).
I've read that to bring Puerto Rico up to fully following Federal laws and mandates (environmental, health, etc.) that State's have to follow would be extremely expensive.
The US Constitution only requires votes by the states when creating a new state from existing states, or combining existing states.
The only requirement of entirely new states is that they not allow slavery.
Remember how we shouldn't be federally subsidizing people who live in flood plains or areas likely to be devastated by storms and cut off in times of need on the mainland?
Yeah, repeal The Jones Act that'll solve the problem. Friggin' retards.
I sailed my boat to Puerto Rico and lived there.
I fell in love with the people, enjoyed the climate and sporting activities.
I lived in Ponce, Mayagüez, and various small ports on the south coast.
I stayed long enough to get my medical license and start to apply for jobs.
It turns out the taxes are not low, you pay an amount to the state government that’s entirely equivalent to what you pay to the IRS.
While salaries are far lower than those in Florida.
When you actually try to work there, it is just another corrupt Hispanic hell hole.
The legacy of Spanish colonialism was that all the Spanish speaking countries are corrupt and full of crime.
The best thing that ever happened to Puerto Rico was being taken over by the United States and everyone put on American style welfare.
If Puerto Rico became independent it would be an exact copy of the neighboring island of the Dominican Republic.
We should most definitely let them go and stop pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into it that disappear
Puerto Rico is not a colony. Colonies produced wealth that was expropriated by the regimes that colonized them. If wealth transfer were the criteria of colonization, then the US is a colony of Puerto Rico.
Puerto Rico once had a governor who would have made a great president of the US - Luis Fortuno. He actually cut expenses and laid off unproductive government workers. His reward? He was voted out of office and replaced by a socialist showing that Puerto Ricans are every bit as stupid as the rest of Americans.
PR should have 3 choices on a binding referendum with ranked choice voting to decide it once and for all. One, status quo, two, become the 51st state, or three, become their own country. Whichever ranked choice wins it, is what it is.
The "become a country" option would come with requirements to prevent intervention/military bases from other countries without US approval.
Puerto Rico wanted independence for years until their government got them so far in debt, then they wanted statehood, the US to bail them out. Yet the US is more in debt and it would be all printed money, hurting not only Puerto Rico but the rest of the US states. People are stupid.
Kick the gringo imperialist pig-dogs out and claim your independence; culturally and financially. What could possibly go wrong?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks ghf-51 online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Good
I’ve earned $17,910 this month by working online from home. I work only six hours a day despite being a full-time college student. Everyone is capable of carrying out this work from their homes and learning it in spare time on a continuous basis.
To learn more, see this article———>>> http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Mike’s not here, Mrs Torrance
Hey!
Google pays $100 per hour. My last paycheck was $3500 working 40 hours a week online. My younger brother’s friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 30 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once.
For more details visit this article.. http://www.LiveJob247.com