Election-Denying Republicans Were Big Losers in the 2022 Midterms
And most of them quietly slunk away afterwards.

After former President Donald Trump's fanciful claims of election fraud spurred a Capitol riot, many observers felt that there was no going back: From now on, conspiracies of fraud would be standard among candidates, and the possibility of danger would only increase.
Trump's most fervent supporters "represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic," President Joe Biden said in September. Days before last month's midterm elections, he even tied election conspiracism to the brutal attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband.
And it wasn't limited just to Trump: In an article titled "Trump is not the only threat to democracy," Darrell West of the Brookings Institute wrote, "One of the worst things Trump has done is to show many other aspirants how to engage in power politics using unethical steps."
But the exact opposite happened: Voters rejected the most illiberal candidates, nearly all of whom chose to respect the results.
One of the most prominent boosters of 2020 election conspiracies was Pennsylvania State Sen. Doug Mastriano, who clinched the Republican nominee for governor with the help of a significant cash infusion from his Democratic opponent, Josh Shapiro. Mastriano insisted the results of the 2020 election were fraudulent, even attending the January 6 rally that preceded the breach of the Capitol, and he threatened not to certify a Democrat as the winner of Pennsylvania's electoral votes in 2024.
And yet, just days after the general election as he trailed his challenger by double digits, Mastriano conceded, saying that "Josh Shapiro will be our next Governor, and I ask everyone to give him the opportunity to lead and pray that he leads well."
In fact, all over the country, Republican candidates fared worse with Trump's explicit endorsement than without. Election deniers fared even worse. And like Mastriano, the majority conceded defeat rather than crying fraud.
One of the exceptions is Kari Lake, the firebrand Republican who looked poised to become Arizona's next governor but flamed out after all the votes were counted. She called the results "BS" and spun bizarre accusations of fraud, but her protests aren't catching on. She filed a lawsuit last week alleging that voting machines had been manipulated, and on Thursday a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit and sanctioned Lake, citing her "false, misleading and unsupported factual assertions" in the suit.
Elsewhere in her state, the election conspiracy movement is similarly running on fumes, as Republicans in solid red Cochise County refused to certify the results of their own election, in violation of Arizona law, over fraud allegations the state had already disproven. On Thursday, the board finally certified after a court order forced its hand.
It's possible that voters were swayed by Biden's apocalyptic rhetoric, but that's unlikely given his overall persistent unpopularity. More likely is that average Republicans simply could not stomach the idea of pulling the lever for candidates like Lake or Mastriano. A recent poll found that 52 percent of Republicans believed the midterm elections were "definitely" or "probably" "free and fair"—still a shamefully low percentage, but as Reason's Eric Boehm noted this week, it's also "the highest percentage the group has found in recent surveys about registered Republicans' opinions of elections."
There is evidence that Republican voters are souring on overt election deniers: In Georgia, for example, Herschel Walker ran 5 points behind Brian Kemp, the state's Republican governor. Walker has consistently promoted conspiracies about the 2020 election, while Kemp earned Trump's ire for bucking the former president's entreaties to subvert its results.
While election conspiracism is unlikely to go away anytime soon, among independents and wide swaths of Republican voters, it is thankfully losing its luster.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks ghf-02 online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this
job now by just using this website. http://www.LiveJob247.com
Of course they were the Democrats cheat!
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Republicrats of all colors seem to have difficulties with the truth.
When the headline opens with "election-denying", I know the article is crap and I don't need to bother reading it. Thanks for saving me the time.
They didn't even believe the elections were happening. They might have not even realized they were running for office. The denial was so strong.
"When the headline opens with “election-denying”, I know the article is crap and I don’t need to bother reading it. Thanks for saving me the time."
Because sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting "I can't hear you" worked so well when you were six years old.
But I have heard them, and know that I don't need to hear them again. Kind of like when the Jehovah's Witnesses knock on the door. I know they won't have anything new to say.
I have even managed $20,000 per calendar month by simply working some easy tasks from my apartment. As I had lost my office career, I was very disturbed but luckily I’ve discovered this best on-line career that’s why I’m capable of earning a thousand USD just from home. Each person can avail this best offer & collect more greenbacks online
checking this article>>OPEN>> GOOGLE WORK
If you're going to be wilfully ignorant, you may as well be proud of it.
And most of them quietly slunk away afterwards.
You know which election deniers didn't slink away afterwards but in fact got promoted by their party? A couple of them actually ran campaigns for President and one of them actually won.
They didn’t just not slink away, they used the deep state to attempt a coup. Which Reason supported.
Hakeem Jeffries has a legitimate complaint about 2016. He didnt try to overthrow the peaceful transfer of power. Trump cultists almost did.
But keep blaming all evils on democrats.
Holy shit how drunk are you?
hey, just one more guy in a Viking helmet and they would have taken over the govt!
The defense forces of the US couldnt handle such a show of power - it is known!
"Innocent by reason of incompetence" is not a thing.
A grossly incompetent attempt to overthrow the Government is still an attempt to overthrow government.
"But Judge I was too stupid to ever get away with it" would not fly in a court of law.
Keep that in mind when your time comes, soy.
If you've ever seen two dogs, wolves, or really any two animals fight, if the loser slinks away at all, it tends to be quietly. If only because it can be hard to make noise with a broken jaw and your guts ripped out.
Case in point: Bob Chapek.
One of them just became the House minority leader.
Libertarians for trusting the system without question!
They seem to be loosing their enthusiasm, judging by this half-assed article. Oh well, orders are orders.
Youre claiming good intentions from the left as evil. Nobody is more evil and emotional than the right. Just look at your post. You're projecting with ad hominems.
How is this a response to my post drunk ass?
The only words I have for a libertarian publication celebrating the loss of an election denier, funded by his democratic opponent because he was an election denier, is… BOAF SIDEZ!
The contest between Team “We miscounted the number of chairs!” and Team “There is no iceberg and even if we hit one, it would be a good thing!” vying for leadership of the Titanic deck crew was close because both sides were equally bad, but the idiots in Team Miscount lost and slunk away quietly.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
AND GOOD LUCK.CLICK HERE............>>> onlinecareer1
"Election-Denying Republicans Were Big Losers in the 2022 Midterms"
Except they weren't, Lancaster, you lying fuck.
Have you thought about not playing 1975 Pravda journalist when you type shit? Don't you worry how history will judge what you write?
Yeah, regardless of whether you buy into the bothsidesism or not, it still feels like a Stalinist celebration of the departure of Trotskyites after Lenin.
I have that right wing liar on mute. But the left is not doing what the right is currently doing with their cult. The right is threatening basic democracy and you're just projecting.
I thought you had me on mute, left wing liar.
But the left is not doing what the right is currently doing with their cult. The right is threatening basic democracy and you’re just projecting.
If one were genuinely 'both sides', even just nominally, the projection is obviously moot; a celebration of the shift away from liberty, to the left being no better than the shift away to the right. The celebration of Trotskyism/Leninism over Stalinism or Stalinism over Trotskyism/Leninism is still a celebration of Marxism, not capitalism or individual liberty.
But even though Trotsky left, Stalin still had him killed.
"There can be only one!"
Winning the house and getting 5 million more votes is losing. We will be back to popular vote complaining next time democrats are in charge.
Also continue to ignore the catering trust in elections for the GOP and independents. It will let the DNC continue to win which Reason prefers.
I know, to restore trust in elections, let's have an audit!
Lol. You demand evidence but also demand no collection of said evidence. It is amazing to see.
Let's keep pushing an election scheme that continues to plummet in how voters view the legitimacy. That is the true way for integrity. Just trust the state and the media backing them. Do it blindly if you have to. Don't ask questions citizen.
Explain to us why anyone should seriously listen to concern trolls who demand audit after audit when the results don't go their way.
At this point you and your tribe are convinced there is MASSIVE FRAUD as an article of faith. No evidence will change your mind.
I see your non sequitur to excuse never investigating votes continues. Blindly accept the state.
Does it even bother you that many of the voting areas have rules in place that are red flags for the Jimmy Carter Commission on voting? Nope. Because it benefits your side.
I am fine with auditing elections. Which happened. Multiple times.
I am not fine with screaming "audit!" when sore losers are upset by losing.
No you are not as you keep linking to only recounts and then crying like a leftist bitch to disallow any actual audits.
Speaking of whining, whimpering, crying, powerless bitches . . . how are the "stolen election" wingnuts doing these days?
Have they changed election results? Are they winning court cases? Or are they just getting their asses kicked, losing in court, doing as they are told, complying with the preferences and decisions of their betters, etc.?
An audit is bad...why?
Because it might expose the evidence he demands and he would rather ignore the possibility of their being evidence.
If you want to pay for it, go ahead. The last one in Maricopa reportedly cost Trumpers almost $6m.
I hope your MAGA subscriptions are up to date!
https://twitter.com/TheRealKeean/status/1598696430918684672?t=h6u3ZhtBBjkBrCE-M7A2rA&s=19
Reminder: Netherland police have shot at children in tractors. They are trying to run over protesters with bulldozers. They will not let anything get in the way of the Great Reset.
https://twitter.com/SonofHas/status/1598771109918175232?t=Y9vbDb7cvCC2OA9NXgnACA&s=19
TIME argues that “election denier” only refers to Republicans, therefore Hakeem Jeffries can’t be an election denier
Yes, really
Even more absurd bc they give clear examples of Jeffries denying the 2016 election’s legitimacy IN THE ARTICLE
[Link]
That is some amazing rationalization. Who do you think posts it first, Jeff or Mike?
Holy shit that's awesome. Thank you!!!
If the term has any meaning, it applies to anyone who denies the legitimacy of an election without evidence of its illegitimacy.
Hakeem Jeffries fits that description.
Days before last month’s midterm elections, he (Biden) even tied election conspiracism to the brutal attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband..
The writer doesn’t seem to disagree with the president for saying this.
Is he as full of shit as Brandon?
With piles of shit so high, it's hard to tell which is bigger.
Is Election Conspiracist better than Election Denier?
I ask it as a hypothetical in case an actual election does happen some day. The only huge thing that happened on a Tuesday this past November was that Reason dumped a bunch of dorky space articles.
And yet the Democrats put an election denying turd in charge!
Bite it, Joe!!!!
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1598829300764930050?t=VMakp_JnvMlnYd8hu2JVsg&s=19
BREAKING: The Twitter Files show Twitter was Censoring user sbased on Direct Requests from the Biden Team in October 2020
I don’t know how else to put this.
There needs to be an impeachment inquiry immediately
The Trump Team had the same power to request user censorship as the Biden Team.
It is not good that either team had the power to request user censorship but at least be honest about who was requesting the censoring.
Thank God an actual libertarian finally showed up. Been a bunch if right wing cry babies today.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Of course you have no argument. You just make ad hominems.
Let's compare sarc's consecutive posts here:
"Been a bunch if right wing cry babies today."
"You just make ad hominems."
I am not a psychologist, but this must be some kind of textbook shit brain behavior.
Bla bla bla. More projection.
Well I have an actual job, unlike some of the right wingers around here who cash their SS checks and then blame socialism.
Cite?
Haha we broke Lying Jeffy. SS checks! Good one Lying Jeffy, been taking joke classes from sarc?
Yes Jeff. Just ignore the thread that goes into it by Taibbi. Or how they locked out Kayleigh's account. It was totally equal in enforcement. If one dem was censored then the 10000 conservatives who were censored doesn’t matter.
Just ignore Posobiec's dishonesty, I see.
He is posting the dump of data from Matt Taibbi you fucking idiot. Elon is working with Taibbi on his Twitter information dump.
You really do like your partisan ignorance.
These: https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598822959866683394
Read, Jeffy, you might actually learn something important this evening.
Jeff will ignore this until his next talking point arrives.
I have been reading it. That is where I learned that both Team Biden and Team Trump had the power to request user censorship on Twitter.
Again it is bad that either team had the power to request anyone be censored on Twitter. At least Taibbi is honest enough to state that both teams had that power.
Posobiec didn't though, he lied to you via omission when he brought up only that Team Biden had that power while ignoring that Team Trump also had that power.
That’s your only takeaway? Not that it was far more prevelant on one side?
Talk about cognitive dissonance.
The only omission here is you stating it was done by both sides and not one being more prevelant based on the examples.
Youre being as dishonest as you claim Prosebiec is being. Lol.
My takeaway from Posobiec's tweet is that he's lying to you by omission. My takeaway from your reaction is that you enjoy being lied to.
Similar to the lies from omission you are currently pushing?
I see you are refusing to acknowledge that I am right.
Lol. God damn youre pathetic jeff. What was the very next post from Taibbi. I linked it for you. Can you dare to read it?
I missed the tweet to the Trump campaign "Handled" in response to a request that Twitter publish the NY Post story.
I mean Taibbi did demonstrate both sides. He showed the Trump WH asking Kaykeighs account to be unlocked. It is totally the same as democrats getting other accounts blocked. Both sides are the same.
That's like saying that both I and Don Corleone could ask a store owner to give money to a "charity".
Taibbi demonstrated both sides had the power to request user censorship. Why didn't Posobiec mention it?
Jeff. Please keep demonstrating you didnt get past post 10 when it started making your team look bad lol.
Here is from Taibbi:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
Follow
Replying to @mtaibbi
10.Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However:
.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
Follow
Replying to @mtaibbi
11. This system wasn't balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right. https://opensecrets.org/orgs/twitter/summary?id=D000067113
Amazing how you missed that tweet since you're monitoring it.
Both parties had access to these tools
Read it and weep
But one was far more equal than the other.
Lol. Wow. How retarded are you going in your defense of this?
Defense of what?
You mean where I explicitly said that it was bad that any team had the power to request user censorship? That defense?
Why don't you tell us why you are so keen on defending Posobiec?
Jeff. Yes or no. The actions were more prevelant on one side?
And Taibbi really softballs it
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1598842477200699392?t=YAn2N1xBR1XGSQ4S8eZv1w&s=19
Machinery that is, in theory, available to both sides but whose mechanism are, in practice, dominated by one side allowing for the manipulation of procedural outcomes
https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1598842355724931072?t=_V0t1OIY4sUv86O25NC63A&s=19
Interesting, but Matt’s neutral narration misses the obvious: All of the internal discussions are not about whether the story *should* be suppressed, but coming up w/a cover story for it. There is zero chance that they would’ve suppressed a major paper for a Don Jr laptop story.
You're such a liar. How would Elon know what prior Twitter executives did? The fact is some democrats were also banned. Both sides did it. There is zero data that the GOP was more effected.
"You’re such a liar. How would Elon know what prior Twitter executives did?"
He, uh, published proof of what they did. Not sure what more you need, but tell us more about shifting goalposts.
Remember, 2 years ago, "This was not happening"
Posobiec is dishonestly reframing Taibbi's reporting to push a narrative rather than to inform.
Taibbi wrote that both teams had the power to request user censorship on Twitter.
Posobiec didn't. He only wrote about Team Biden's power to do so, completely ignoring Team Trump's power to do so.
Why do you think that is, Jesse? Hmm?
Here, let me give you a clue: because people like Posobiec are lying to you, they want to feed your rage rather than to inform you. They WANT you to be angry and pissed off.
No. He isnt. You are though.
Your claim is both sides did it as a statement of equivalence when the clear evidence is it was not.
It is the same argument you used to defend IRS targeting of conservative groups as well.
Why didn't Posobiec also mention Team Trump also had the power to request user censorship on Twitter?
He's reposting Taibbi's tweets and linking to them. You're just a bit disingenuous there, Jeffy, and more than a little obtuse.
In the tweet linked above, why didn't Posobiec mention Team Trump also had the power to request user censorship?
"He’s reposting Taibbi’s tweets"
He's NOT reposting them. If he had he would have mentioned Team Trump also had the power to request user censorship. He is instead "reframing" the tweets dishonestly.
Seriously, that's what you're going to stick with, the hill you choose to die on? All so you can claim "boaf sidz!"?
Posobiec is a propagandist and a liar. And you enjoy it because he tells you things you want to hear.
Jeff. Youre doing exactly what you accuse him of. Your focused on a single line of his tweets to try to claim both sides while ignoring everything else.
Please keep pretending you aren’t a leftist.
Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCGD9dT12C0
Fleetwood Mac was ahead of their time!
(If ONLY we will institute The Perpetual TrumptatorShit, and make ALL of the liberals cry, then life will be PERFECT FOREVER!!!)
What "everything else"? That is Posobiec's whole tweet above. He didn't mention that Team Trump also had the power to request user censorship. Why not?
Ahh. I see jeff is going full retard. He is discussing all of Taibbi tweets. Not just a single line. Unlike you.
“The Trump Team had the same power to request user censorship as the Biden Team.”
But did they?
Impeachment for which crimes? Twitter apparently did all the censoring, based on Twitter's own policies and/or whims. Literally anyone could flag posts to Twitter for consideration.
Now it's supposed to have been a "high crime or misdemeanor" for anyone in the government (er, in 2020, you mean not in the government) to flag posts to Twitter?
https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1598815311117033472?t=1yvBeWEq0iEewBnRzxx-KA&s=19
As you await the Hunter Biden story to come out, remember that the FBI approached Facebook (and probably Twitter) BEFORE it was published. They knew about it because they were spying on everyone. We have a Cheka in this country that doesn’t frighten you near as much as it should.
There's a Hunter Biden story? Oh my, why is nobody talking about it?
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598831435288563712?t=nFlzPe--_PUnvyQLRkz4gA&s=19
18. Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be “unsafe.” They even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases, e.g. child pornography.
[Thread]
Yeah, that worked.
Joe Lancaster broke the first rule of reason, a libertarian publication, mind you: never claim that Donald trump lost the 2020 election. If we libertarian commenters know anything, it’s that Donald trump won the election and china or Russia or aliens conspired to put Biden in office.
There’s no way that the American public decided that Donald trump was a shitty narcissist asshole that we were tired of. Nope, stolen election.
Joe Lancaster broke the first rule of reason, a libertarian publication, mind you: never claim that Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election. If we libertarian commenters know anything, it’s that Hillary Clinton won the election and china or Russia or aliens conspired to put Trump in office.
There’s no way that the American public decided that Hillary Clinton was a shitty narcissist asshole that we were tired of. Nope, stolen election.
Except the comment section isn't full of Hillary fanbois and Team Blue assholes who come here every day only wanting to "pwn the cons".
I also love that you think Hillary's behavior in 2016 and Trump's behavior in 2020 were equivalent.
Lol. Yes. Nobody here like yourself, mike, and others pushed trump russia.
I also remember you calling to lock up Hillary and totally not defending her.
Do you think their behavior was equivalent?
One resulted in 3 years of deep state attacks using the power of government against the other candidate including False FISA warrants.
The other gave a speech a mile away from the Capitol while protesting the election as both parties have done throughout the history of elections. Totes the same.
"One resulted in"
"The other gave a speech"
Wow that's a dishonest comparison.
"One wrote a book. The other gave a speech." That would be a fairer comparison.
"One resulted in a 3 year FISA investigation. The other resulted in a riot at the Capitol." That would be a fairer comparison.
But those aren't what you went with, was it?
I'm sorry. Do you think trump still led the rioters into the Capitol despite the entire timeliness being presented by the J6 commission?
Lol.
Will you admit the bureaucracy turned on trump and utilized state resources to go after him? Did trump do the same to his opponents? Yes or no?
HEY REASON!! You're missing this!
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598840265266995203
The “Twitter Files” tell an incredible story from inside one of the world’s largest and most influential social media platforms. It is a Frankensteinian tale of a human-built mechanism grown out the control of its designer.
Just wow.
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598840927199469569/photo/1
Szabo’s letter contains chilling passages relaying Democratic lawmakers’ attitudes. They want “more” moderation, and as for the Bill of Rights, it's "not absolute"
Look up "demurred".
Voters rejected the most illiberal candidates, nearly all of whom chose to respect the results.
Voters rejected those candidates only in elections that were competitive. Which is a good start. But the reality is that 80-90% of elections are NOT competitive. And as you can see from commenters here - it is quite clear that many are still stuck on stupid and conspiracy.
Glen Greenwald:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1598843611705057280
Not only is there no evidence that the documents used by the NY Post were the by-product of "hacking" by Russia or anyone else -- Twitter's false excuse for banning discussion of the story -- the NYT has confirmed that the laptop was left and never picked up at the repair store
Yep. It was the easiest story in the world to verify.
Clearly, Twitter is just too important to be left in the hands of private enterprise: nationalise Twitter now!
Robby:
https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1598839345770684416
Ro Khanna is smart!
That’s my own Congress Critter. I agree with the one comment: Let’s not go overboard!
You can tell who benefited by who is most pissed.
Stephen Miller:
https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1598836549344702464
Will be incredibly instructive at who is the most upset at Taibbi's thread tonight. So far we have Tim Miller and Ben Collins leading the pack.
Matt Taibbi:
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598845423979884544
While reviewing Gadde's emails, I saw a familiar name - my own. Dorsey sent her a copy of my Substack article blasting the incident
https://twitter.com/thuleanrevenant/status/1598841467468140545?t=AJ3m3Kltz5BDndJGyyPR3g&s=19
This Jim Baker was an FBI agent who investigated Trump over Russia before he left the agency to work at twitter. Just like the FDA is a revolving door with drug companies, Twitter is a revolving door with intelligence agencies.
[Link]
Glenn:
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1598845361509892097
This is not being done autonomously by tech firms. The censorship is being coerced by the in-power Democratic Party, who explicitly wants more censorship online
And, I'll bet anything, these extraordinary documents - showing the extreme pressure and collusion between liberal Twitter execs and Dem Party leaders to censor reporting on Biden - won't be reported by liberal outlets except to mock it and/or use DNC talking points to attack it.
Put another way, it's almost inconceivable to imagine NBC News, CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post - let alone the shitty Brooklyn-based digital tabloids - to give voice to a single person to explain why these documents are so explosive and reveal grave corruption.
That's an interesting use of the term "in-power Democratic Party", considering that they were not actually in office during 2020 when this incident occurred.
Of course, half the people on this thread think Joe Biden was "in power" during Hunter's 2017 attempts to cash in on his family name in China.
https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1598844734176645120?t=en7kCpNAV6qysc-vQLC7Bg&s=19
This dude getting nuked is the one of the most important decisions in social media history.
Meanwhile on Mastodon
[Pic]
Let's say the correlation holds up, and that Trump's endorsement was associated with candidates' doing worse. How do we know the causation doesn't run the opposite way? It could be that the reason Trump endorsed them was that they were behind and needed more help.
Just by the numbers it is a silly correlation as McConnel donated far more overall to the candidates than Trump did with his PAC.
Vijaya Gadde seems to have been the mastermind behind the censorship.
https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-twitter-files-reveal-vijaya-gadde-behind-censorship-of-hunter-biden-laptop-story?utm_campaign=64483
"The decision was made at the highest levels of the company, but without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, with former head of legal, policy and trust Vijaya Gadde playing a key role," wrote journalist Matt Taibbi.
Astounding. Another Posobiec propaganda piece. Do you have a romantic relation with him or something?
You seem very concerned this information is being released.
There's a Joe Rogan episode with Tim Poole, Gadde and Dorsey. Poole brings up instances of Twitter bias, one example being the posts threatening violence on that Cincinnatti kid long after the whole story came out and the posts were never deleted. Gadde did a song and dance (Oh we'll have to look into that) and Dorsey appeared absolutely clueless as to what was going on at Twitter.
Don’t worry too much about Gadde. I’m sure the New York Times will be more than happy to hire him, unless the South China Morning Post outbids them. Or maybe Tik-Tok, after all, he's an experienced liar.
Her, actually, but yes, they'd be ready to hire her in a heartbeat.
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. I have misgendered a snake.
Interesting...
https://twitter.com/lavern_spicer/status/1598846576637579264
In case you haven’t noticed, @HillaryClinton
has turned off the replies to all her tweets as of tonight ?
All for tonight with more to come.
https://twitter.com/mtaibbi/status/1598853399004708864
It's been a whirlwind 96 hours for me, too. There is much more to come, including answers to questions about issues like shadow-banning, boosting, follower counts, the fate of various individual accounts, and more. These issues are not limited to the political right.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1598853177503203329
Of course the liberal who was empowered by the old regime to censor on Twitter, Yoel Roth, is on that Mastadon thing they fled to, whining that reporting on major corporate actors like Twitter and its collusion with Biden campaign puts people "in harm's way." That's their MO.
It should.
Makes me wonder how long it will take the progressive media to get this story stuffed down the memory hole. The New York Times, et al, managed to hide 6 million dead from starvation in Ukraine.
They’re already trying.
https://libertytree.com/liberty-tree/3526
Fox News reports, “An FBI agent testified to Republican attorneys general this week that the FBI held weekly meetings with Big Tech companies in Silicon Valley ahead of the 2020 presidential election to discuss 'disinformation' on social media and ask about efforts to censor that information.
https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/1598834859522555904?t=NC2CktwIBOpcjDWnk91Qig&s=19
Taibbi confirms that Twitter exec Vijaya Gadde played a key role in suppressing the Oct. 2020 Hunter Biden laptop story. Gadde was later appointed by the Biden admin to an advisory role shaping the Department of Homeland Security's "disinfo" policy.
Gadde was appointed to the DHS panel in December 2021 as part of a team crafting policy for "combating misinformation and disinformation impacting the security of critical infrastructure."
And I doubt Reason will publish a timely story on the greatest violation of the 1st amendment in US history...
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1598864377750306816?t=MAsR9E1cKOjEkMSNtu49bw&s=19
Tune in for Episode 2 of The Twitter Files tomorrow!
I mean, it's amazing that there are supposed "people" who will pretend this isn't a HUGE deal. We knew it was happening, we now have hard evidence.
Do you realize what's going on?
Do you truly comprehend the horror we live in?
So many people saying "we already knew all this........."
Reason will have a story about collusion between Democrats and Big Social Media and how private parties can say anything because of the 1st Amendment. Then they will end up condemning Ron DeSantis for the "Don't say gay" law which had nothing to do with gays, lesbians or any other sexual minority.
No one will mention the FBI or the CIA saying to social media (in effect) "Nice company you've got there, it would be a shame if section 230 were to be repealed. Of course the new rules would only be enforced against certain companies, if you get my drift".
It works for the Chinese, why not for the US?
Great article, also you can see my work by https://safwalawfirm.com/.
Mike isn’t here Mrs Torrance
Elon Musk Releases THE TWITTER FILES: How Twitter Collaborated With "The Biden Team" To Cover Up The Hunter Laptop Story
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/elon-musk-releases-twitter-files-how-twitter-collaborated-biden-team-cover-hunter-notebook
Finally, it will be very interesting to see which "independent", "impartial" and "objective" members of the Mainstream Media cover the Twitter Files, which unlike all that Russia collusion bullshit, was a real and actionable attempt to interfere with US democracy by covering up one of the most explosive political stories of a generation, not to mention an event that would have swayed the 2020 presidential election.
Nationalize Twitter!
And in other non-BS news.
Trumps endorsement success reaches an all-time high of 83%
https://ballotpedia.org/Endorsements_by_Donald_Trump
There is a difference between an endorsement and an endorsement in a close race. Can you figure out what it is?
TDS?
Apparently not!
The big losers were election deniers who were running for statewide positions where they'd have some control over the elections. Arizona seems to be an exception in that all of them going for statewide positions lost.
I note that incumbent congresspeople didn't fare badly regardless. In fact all incumbent Senators (except possibly Warnock with the runoff) who were up won re-election.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
AND GOOD LUCK.CLICK HERE..............>>> onlinecareer1
Election-Denying Republicans Were Big Losers in the 2022 Midterms
Absolutely right. Why that JDVance, he's.......he's what? Oh.
Well, surely that trumpy Lauren Boebert got her as...what?!...even with the fortification? Damn.
Well then, Marjorie Taylor-Greene surel----no?
Jexus christ. What was the pointing of this gloaty article if there's nothing to gloat over? Kari Lake? Really? Given the track record do you REALLY think that's gonna stand? The damned election board formed a PAC against the woman and didn't recuse themselves. Right out in the open.
And now Musk is spilling everything. You know that he's got THOSE tweets.