Review: The Star Wars Prequel Trilogy Is Good, Actually
The millennial generation has had enough anti-prequel propaganda.

During the climax of Revenge of the Sith, the third Star Wars prequel film, an angst-ridden Anakin Skywalker snarls at his former master, Obi-Wan Kenobi: "You underestimate my power!" (Obi-Wan proceeds to sever three of Anakin's limbs, burn off all his skin, and leave him for dead. Anakin later becomes the cyborg villain Darth Vader, dark enforcer of the Galactic Empire.)
To hear the critics tell it, people disliked this origin story. The three prequels—The Phantom Menace (1999), Attack of the Clones (2002), and Revenge of the Sith (2005)—were largely written off as disappointments.
If you saw these movies in the theater as a kid, you might have felt differently. While the expert consensus dwelt obsessively on the admittedly clumsy dialogue and certain CGI excesses, who can deny the sheer coolness of Yoda—tiny, green, hobbling Yoda—mowing down clone soldiers with a lightsaber? Pretty awesome, it was.
The idea that the prequel trilogy's focus on trade disputes, Senate intrigue, and the subtle manipulations of cloaked tyrants is somehow boring never made much sense. And the prequels bear a lot of thematic weight: The galaxywide battles against Separatist droid armies have obvious parallels to the unending war on terror, and the corruption of liberal institutions via "emergency powers" remains all too resonant.
Yes, the prequels fail to portray a plausible interplanetary society. Compared with rival franchises like Star Trek, Dune, and Battlestar Galactica, very little effort is invested in explaining the technology that allows for light-speed travel and planet-sized battle stations. But that was also true of the original films, which asked audiences to accept all sorts of underbaked ideas and space-faring inconsistencies. (Han Solo, an interstellar smuggler, isn't even aware that a parsec is a unit of distance rather than time.)
Sorry, but the millennial generation has had enough anti-prequel propaganda. Criticize their films' flaws if you must, but don't underestimate their power.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.?????????.???
I get paid over ?200$? per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over ?10k? a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job (mjd-27) online! i do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
I always thought the parsecs thing was clever because it suggested that Star Wars' hyperspace travel worked by reducing the distance between two points.
No, it is not good.
Not from a writing perspective, not from an acting perspective, and not from a cinematography perspective
It's as bad as the sequel trilogy, just in different ways.
Millennials have been spoiled by a generation of bad fiction to accept anything that isn't utter crap as 'good'.
This is a generation that was propagandized into thinking a bunch of young adult fiction novels about teenage wizards were on the same intellectual level as Tolkein or Shakespeare. The main reason the prequels are getting retconned as "not that bad" is because the sequels were the film equivalent of the sewage.
Like you said, the writing, acting, and cinematography are all subpar. To be fair to Lucas, the plotlines are all driven by that underlying character arc of Anakin's downfall, it's just that they're poorly executed. Lucas has always been really good at coming up with broad concepts that employ universal storytelling themes; he just needed to outsource the actual screenplays to better writers.
I always thought that the prequels should have tied Anakin's downfall as a highly idealistic prodigy, who experienced an increasing disenchantment from the growing realization that the Jedi were compromising their principles to prop up a corrupt, decadent Republic that no longer lived up to what it supposedly stood for, and had not done so for decades if not centuries. In that context, his fall is born in hatred and is redeemed by the love of his son. Lucas fucked that up by making it about Anakin being an entitled drama queen with mommy issues.
The lightsaber duel in RotS is actually pretty good. Worth watching just for that.
I mean, people forget that RotJ wasn't that good compared to the other members of the original trilogy. And where ESB tends to dominate 'best SW film' because of its themes and (imo) superior acting, the original has by far the best cinematography and film structure.
It's not. It goes on for way too long.
There are virtually no millennials who can remember a time when the word “liberal” wasn’t taken to mean “identitarian statist” or a time when the ACLU still held to a concept of “free speech” which included protecting expression of even abhorrent ideas (or even ones that might hurt someone’s feelings a bit) if done by nonviolent means.
How can such a generation comprehend the allegorical aspects of the first two prequels, especially in relation to the corruption of liberal ideals in response to an “emergency”?
Explaining actual liberalism to people who think that putting people who aren’t vaxxed agiainst a virus with a 0.1% hospitalization rate into concentration camps is consistent with the idea of “bodliy autonomy” provided they’ve got “appropriate” opinions on abortion and who should be allowed to play on which sports teams would seem to be akin to explaining the color red to someone born without sight.
See post in this blog toward the end of today: shockingly, the ACLU is standing up for someone’s free speech.
The one sequence where Annakin slaughters the Tusken villagers has some well-done cinematography -- oh, wait, that's because it's a shot-by-shot clone of "The Searchers".
The writing isn't just bad at the level of lines of dialogue. So many aspects of the underlying plot don't make any damn sense.
Now hold on, as bad as the sequel trilogy? Ouch.
I mean, Phantom Menace is pretty terrible. But even it's not as bad as Rise of Skywalker. Attack of the Clones is sorta kinda okay...ish... (at least if you fast forward through Hayden Christensen's utter failure to flirt), which puts it head and shoulders above anything in the new trilogy. Revenge of the Sith is halfway decent, arguably better than (or at least competitive with) RotJ, the worst of the original trilogy.
I'm not saying it's great, I'm just saying the sequel trilogy is a dumpster fire. (And RotS does pretty well, especially for having to put up with Hayden Christensen in a starring role).
"very little effort is invested in explaining the technology that allows for light-speed travel and planet-sized battle stations"
Are you serious?
None of that matters. Star Trek wasn't good because of the incessant technobabble.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
AND GOOD LUCK.CLICK HERE.........>>> onlinecareer1
Trek, especially in the later iterations never addressed the immense capabilities of some of the more "mundane" tech like transporters and replicators. The handful of exceptions to this came up in "one-off" episodes which the entire cast seemed to lose any/all recall of immediately after the real-time events had concluded.
Someone explain to me how a replicator which can create something as complex in composition as a completely cooked turkey with stuffing on a tray would be incapable of manufacturing an explosive compound consisting of 2-3 ingredients...
Now the "prequel" series they've made is really screwing with canon by doing things which "refer back" to events that would actually be centuries into their future. TNG had an episode in which they found Scotty had somehow stored himself in a transporter buffer, but even the engineers of that advanced century apparently couldn't figure out how or ever repeat the accomplishment; now in the series about Pike's time as captain of the first Enterprise, the ship's doctor is secretly doing the same with his daughter in the "medical transporter" (a feature which wasn't present on the Enterprise in TOS, and was apparently first introduced to starship design more than 100 years later since it was present on Voyager)
You look at all the other space-focused articles (but Reason doesn't have an editorial slant!) and then you see this one and it's obvious Soave was too deep I to the fruit sushi bar and not paying attention in the meeting.
The prequels had great visuals. They really took the steam punk up a notch.
But midichlorians?
LULZ
At least they emphasized the self-serving nature of the Jedi, and equated the Republic with the Confederate slave holders.
I remember my co-worker's one-line review of Episode I: "Midichlorians, my ass!"
They only had 'great visuals' for a handful of overcluttered CGI space battle scenes.
Most everything else was static shots of people slowly walking down CGI hallways spouting exposition to each other.
Lucas has always done his best work when backed up by a good team. He did the prequels all by himself and . . . frankly, I don't think he actually wanted to do them. I think he was long done with Star Wars.
I've learned a long time ago that when someone is done with their work its best to just move on - if you *force* them into continuing you'll get subpar work. Prequels and 'The Hobbit' as examples.
Lucas sought to add a scientific explanation to the one and only aspect of the Star Wars universe that should never have been explained scientifically.
who can deny the sheer coolness of Yoda—tiny, green, hobbling Yoda—mowing down clone soldiers with a lightsaber? Pretty awesome, it was.
Remember when Luke went looking for a "great warrior" and found a diminutive gremlin who told him that "wars not make on great"? The entire point of Yoda was to de-emphasize the physical. Physically, Yoda is nothing, but with the force, his power is immense. The prequels were complete shit because they fundamentally misunderstood their own story.
ESB > ANH >>>> ROTJ = Solo > R1 > TPM = TLJ > ROTS >>>> AOTC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TFA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ROS
OH MY SPACE GOD
The idea that the prequel trilogy's focus on trade disputes, Senate intrigue, and the subtle manipulations of cloaked tyrants is somehow boring never made much sense.
This is an idiotic defense of that. The reason it's boring is because we're told there's a trade dispute, but it's just flatly stated with no depth. There's space political functions, where we see the speeches in front of the Senate and the mechanisms of voting, but there's no exploration of the parties. You're just told there's a key election but two of the three candidates get mentioned, once, by name; there's no actual politicking or exploration of the political issues that would make a political story compelling. We're simply told there are bureaucratic obstacles preventing the heroes from getting what they want without understanding what those are.
And the political picture we're painted is kid of nonsense. There IS a galactic government, but you're explicitly told that it's perfectly legal for one state to perform a military blockade of another member state. I don't see how that could possibly function as a government-imagine if Missouri just decided to block all roads and paths into Iowa. That's blatantly an act of war, but it's treated as if it's perfectly normal up until one of the members puts boots on the ground.
You don't learn anything about the factions in the government. What does the Trade Federation actually want? Just to invade a planet? The military resources they're deploying on this venture are massive, but if they're actually motivated by profits, what's the return? We never learn about it and it's never hinted at, but it's clear that they jumped straight to sending people into internment camps.
The politics are too shallow to invest in. You don't understand what the sides are, what the parties value, who is allied with whom, how things are being manipulated, what the relative stakes are-nothing. Game of Thrones is nothing but court politics and was well loved because the players have depth and are well-explained.
Go home, Robby. You’re drunk.
“Phantom menace” is the worst film ever made, based on my metric of resource-adjusted quality (RAQ) thus:
Quality / (Total cost x hype) = RAQ
The lower the RAQ, the worse the film.
Yeah, there are shittier films – but with much less hype and lower costs.
The Force Awakens was much much worse by that metric. It’s a far worse movie and the hype was far greater.
But yes, that title easily belongs to Star Wars as a franchise.
Mesa vewy welieved dat dis one issa okayday
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing..
AND GOOD LUCK.CLICK HERE.........>>> onlinecareer1
Apparently Mr. Soave is trying to incite the slaughter of millennials.
the whole princess & anakin sitting in a tree nonsense also was awful but it's not like I walked out of any of the movies
It's revealing Soave makes his "point" without mentioning the true objections: wooden acting and ridiculous plot points which undermine the story.
(Han Solo, an interstellar smuggler, isn't even aware that a parsec is a unit of distance rather than time.)
Hey Robby, v = d/t. If I tell you my car does 0-60 mph in ~185 ft. it's the exact same thing as telling you it does 0-60 mph in ~4.2 s. Germans/Americans and the urban/rural cultural divide are notorious for conflating distance and time to answer the question "How long?" because of the differing constraints.
I'm not a defender of Han Solo or Lucas as you effectively set all context about the nebulousness of a Kessel Run and faster than light travel aside. But, having done that, at least try to be minimally aware of 9th grade physics (or 4th grade race car/spaceship fandom) and taking memes out of context to avoid being even more retarded than Han Solo or Lucas are.
>>to avoid being even more retarded
finishing title with "akshually" was bad beginning.
It also shows a lack of imagination, that their FTL speed is accomplished by shrinking the distance, by finding 4D wormholes which bypass the 3D structure, and thus bragging about how short a wormhole you can create is the proper bragging.
The three movies felt like infomercials for Star Wars toys. And there is a special spot in hell for whoever conjured-up Jar Jar Binks.
There is a fan theory out there that originally, Lucas had Jar Jar Binks being a Sith Lord. If you watch closely, Jar Jar's comedy antics also end up being very effective in battle, and there are times where his nonsense dialogue seems to actually be Jedi Mind control (people end up restating exactly what he said, a la "These aren't the droid's we're looking for"). The theory goes that he was so badly received by audiences that they scrapped these plans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yy3q9f84EA
more sense as a Jedi than a whatever he was
It's a fun theory to shitpost about, but ultimately the biggest strike against it is that it would require George Lucas to have been that clever, and he clearly isn't.
Oh yes, totally agree. It is an amusing theory. A wrong one- but still amusing.
The Solo movie expressly explained that the Kessel run record was a matter of distance. It's like how everyone was trying to find a northwest passage around Canada to cut the distance for ships.
The Solo movie was shit and the explanation is shit.
Its simple - Lucas misused a term in the script. Nothing more needs to be explained and the ridiculous lengths people go to find an 'in-universe' explanation is just sad.
Its amusing to calculate the power of a blaster bolt based on the effects you see on screen. Its sad and pathetic to then write an essay trying to find justifications as to why the actual effects don't match the stated power in some 'art of Star Wars' book somewhere.
Its simple – Lucas misused a term in the script. Nothing more needs to be explained and the ridiculous lengths people go to find an ‘in-universe’ explanation is just sad.
We can agree that Lucas misused the term, but we can't *know* he misused the term. More critically, the calling out is even less otherwise correct. It would be like if Solo had said "upshot" when he meant "side effect" and everybody was criticizing him saying "Upshot means only a positive outcome and side effects are always bad."
Lucas may've made a mistake and may be trying to cover it up or straighten it out, but people like Robbie don't give a shit about being correct and just want to smash things and fuck shit up in order to have it their way.
Yes we can know he missed the term when he says he screwed up himself.
Even if you haven't seen the Solo movie, which wasn't out at the time of The Prequels, the underlying argument is that the only way to set *any* record is with time. Not speed, not distance, not mass with speed or distance... none of that matters, only time and, presumably, less time at that. Even to the point of refuting fixed parameters of a fair competition.
I plow an acre in a day and you plow 1/24th of an acre in a hour? Well, clearly you're the faster plowman as it only took you an hour! Who gives a shit about the area covered? Nobody ever won a contest by dominating an area or doing so for longer, much less understanding physics at an elementary-school level.
I could list out all of my disagreements with this article, but there has never been a better explanation than this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI&list=PLZJ2yOBfQ1hr3wacUOgHhY_ZFZ2ujxAEo
THIS.
This review series should be a 101 course for any aspiring filmmaker. Or storyteller at all.
RLM in general annoy me, but they hit it out of the park with this analysis.
File this under: Uh Oh, Someone's wrong on the Internet... 😉
But really: Propaganda? Even this article hardly dredges up anything good about the movies.
The fact is, Phantom Menace is absolute garbage on a plate. Clone Wars has a few brief interesting moments, which are buried in a lackluster McGuffin hunt, and a supposed 'romance' that is so cringe, it's hard no to physically squirm in discomfort.
Now, my argument has always been that the plot of Revenge of the Sith (the OK-est of the 3 movies) could have spanned all three prequel films, but still needed some work. Most of Anakin's childhood and backstory would have been better alluded to, as it was in the original films.
It would have been interesting to see him wrestling with true inner conflicts between the lust for power, rather than essentially being somewhat easily manipulated or 'tricked' by the Emperor.
Bleh blah blah, and so on.
I think at the end of the day the problem with the prequels (and the new Disney trilogy) is writing. It never was there. If you had asked a few true SciFi fans to sit down, and throw ideas out, or draw them on a napkin for a couple hours - you could have come up with something more coherent and compelling.
Lucas tried something different, and he does deserve credit for that, but he was never a great writer. Disney...somehow... (and this still blows my mind)...didn't bother to map out 3 stories before filming. But their bizarre failure doesn't make the Lucas prequels better either, and there's nothing propaganda about that.
Revenge is decent.
I think there could have been a really good movie if you took the first two and condensed them down to 45 minutes and then took the top 45 minutes of Revenge and made them just one movie.
Yup I created a short cut of 1/2 and most of 3 that I showed my kids. It worked fine.
Now, my argument has always been that the plot of Revenge of the Sith (the OK-est of the 3 movies) could have spanned all three prequel films, but still needed some work. Most of Anakin’s childhood and backstory would have been better alluded to, as it was in the original films.
Yeah, I thought they should have actually started off with Anakin and Obi-Wan as jedi master and apprentice right from the get-go, and just have some dialogue between Obi-Wan and Yoda talking about how Anakin came under his tutelage rather than Yoda's. You could even establish something of a backstory via a Tatooine visit to Owen and Beru when they were younger, show that Anakin had always been rather wild and impulsive and that Owen in particular always disliked him because of that. At the end, have Obi-Wan lie to Owen and Beru that Anakin was killed by Darth Vader, and that they need to keep his infant son safe from the latter.
You keep the plot lines tied together with the original trilogy much better that way, without having to come up with some dumb shit like midicholrians that ends up getting dropped entirely by the next movie.
I would have had Anakin's turning point be something like the Dark Horse Clone Wars comic "Last Stand on Jabiim," where the Jedi end up in an Iraq-type battle of attrition with a rebel planet that had been screwed over by Republic indifference to a major event such as a plague or pirate enslavement, and have that start to alienate Anakin from the idea of the Republic and the Jedi as the perpetual cause for good in the galaxy.
Disney…somehow… (and this still blows my mind)…didn’t bother to map out 3 stories before filming.
Has JJ Abrams ever crafted a story that didn't consist of his stupid mystery boxes? No wonder they couldn't write anything coherent with that dingleberry putting it together.
Abrams and Kathleen Kennedy have their stroke in the industry specifically because Spielberg is their mentor (shit, Kennedy's career is solely due to the fact that she's been the equivalent of a security blanket for him the last 35-plus years), and anyone with one of the main entertainment mafia dons flying top cover for them can produce piles of horse shit that they'll never have to worry about cleaning up.
Alternatively, Red Letter Media has hours and hours of content explaining why the prequels were just horrible. Watch it when you have time, and you will truly understand, "You may not have seen it, but your brain did."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI
Let this stand as incontrovertible proof that Robby Soave's opinions have the intellectual heft of a snowflake, both a literal and metaphorical snowflake at that. From now on, whenever Soave would deign to give his opinion on anything, I'm going to respond with, "Yeah but you also thought the SW Prequels were good, so you have demonstrated yourself pretty unreliable."
And they didn't even cover absolutely everything in their hours and hours of coverage. Because there's nothing wrong with space politics as a concept-it works in Star Trek. It CAN work in Star Wars, if you actually focus on them and develop them. You need to know who the factions are and what they want, though, and that's just present in these stories. Nobody ever goes into why the Seperatists want to separate from the central government. You might question whether they're secretly the good guys the whole time, except the films make it explicit because they're constantly aggressive and murdering people.
It's not written for 9 year olds, it's written as though a 9-year-old came up with it and put no thought into how the universe operates.
Yes. That's Lucas's crayola script. Planets, senates - everyone only does things because some Godhead is pulling the strings. Thus it is always a question of whether the Godhead is a good Jedi or a Sith Lord.
The prequels were better than the original trilogy. Anakin's fall to the dark side is a much more compelling story than Luke finding out his absent father is Vader and Vader's subsequent redemption.
When Anakin screams "I hate you!" at Obi-Wan, it chokes me up. As an audience, we've witnessed the bond between those characters and to have it thrown away like that is devastating.
Contrast that to when Luke finds out Vader is his father. Dude's been gone for 20 years and there is no relationship whatsoever. In other words, why should we care?
The prequels were better than the original trilogy. Anakin’s fall to the dark side is a much more compelling story than Luke finding out his absent father is Vader and Vader’s subsequent redemption.
The two storylines are part of a whole piece. Vader's fall to the dark side is driven by his inability to overcome his fear and anger, and his redemption is enabled by the love shown by his son, who refuses to kill him when Vader is at his mercy, and his recognition that Vader hasn't lost what was good in him.
I'm aware. One piece of the story is more compelling than the other, in my opinion. One piece (the prequels) could stand alone as a story. One piece (the originals) needs the other (the prequels) to make sense.
I understood it well enough as a elementary school-age kid, I'm not certain why other would find it baffling.
So, if the most evil person in the galaxy showed up in your 20s, cut your hand off and told you he was the dad you never knew, you'd immediately go on a quest to "save" him, as opposed to saying, "where the fuck you been?"
Likewise, if you were the most evil person in the galaxy, snuffing out life left and right, including going after the son you didn't really know about (but did know about when you cut off his hand), you'd repent at the last moment and sacrifice your life in the name of good?
Immediately? He spent 3 years after Empire completing his training and then had to go save Han before he could even think about confronting Vader again--you really don't think a grown man would take that time to process everything, especially one who's part of a group dedicated to meditation?
Likewise, if you were the most evil person in the galaxy, snuffing out life left and right, including going after the son you didn’t really know about (but did know about when you cut off his hand), you’d repent at the last moment and sacrifice your life in the name of good?
That's the point--Vader wasn't the most evil person in the galaxy, which is exactly why Luke was able to redeem him. Jesus Christ, they addressed this when Vader was walking him to meet the Emperor when Luke says, "I can feel the conflict within you."
"One piece (the originals) needs the other (the prequels) to make sense."
Riiiiiight...Because for the 15 years after Return of the Jedi, the entire world said, "Man that just didn't make sense."
The original trilogy made sense because it told you enough to make sense. Did getting to know more about Anakin make his story more poignant? Sure. Was it absolutely necessary? No. Was it hamfisted, contrived and ultimately destructive to the Star Wars Universe? Without a doubt, yes.
When Anakin screams “I hate you!” at Obi-Wan, it chokes me up. As an audience, we’ve witnessed the bond between those characters and to have it thrown away like that is devastating.
For a second, I thought you were aping the "The part of the movie where Anakin has to shoot his own dog? Brilliant!"/"The part of the movie where Qui-Gon whispers, 'Rosebud!'? Chills!"/"The part of the movie where Anikan shouts 'English, motherfucker! Do you speak it'? Hilarious!" meme.
Then I realized you thought you were being serious... and that I don't care.
i guess if you are comparing them to the final trilogy..........
Compared to what?
Compared to the original trilogy, it trails badly.
Compared to the latest trilogy, it's arguable which is better.
There are only three star wars movies, and one spinoff called "Rogue One".
That is all.
I fucking loved Rogue One. loved.
Second. The fact that it had a female lead and they sold it as (Not a)Star Wars story only to have it be >10X better than any prequel or sequel is just icing on the cake.
And Rogue 1 is better than RotJ to boot!
Why, exactly, was the controller for aligning the antenna up on the roof instead of a nice central control room with HVAC.
Because Rogue One does what a lot of modern movies do: using video game puzzles in lieu of plot.
There probably was a control room that could have done it, but then you have to blast through large numbers of storm troopers and other base personnel. That there is a local control station where the antenna was isn't so implausible as to be immersion breaking.
It totally was.
That control panel plus the control panels that were at the far end of the spaceship docks, both borrowers their logic from how video games are laid out, not how people would realistically do activities like aligning an antenna or undocking a spaceship.
"Obi-Wan proceeds to sever three of Anakin's limbs, burn off all his skin, and leave him for dead."
Yeah, I'm pretty sure some other stuff got burned off too. Vader should have been way more pissed toward the end of ANH.
Wish I could just get the original trilogy digitally without the bad remastering and additions that brought nothing to those films. Definitely the direction the franchise was heading towards at the time. All I could say about the prequels is that they could have been so much better and missed a lot of opportunities.
What you want is the "Despecialized Edition". There's torrents out there of it.
First I'll read the article, then I'll read the comments.
I shudder to think what the comments will say.
Hmmm...the response is pretty much what I expected, but with less profanity.
In 20 years, millenials will be telling us the sequel trilogy wasn't that bad...
Midi-chlorians were a huge disappointment; the Force was better left unexplained, and even KJA's force-testing device was superior in his Jedi Academy Trilogy. But the main failure is that they don't portray Anakin as a sympathetic character, so the weight of the tragedy is lost. They just wrote him as too annoying; it didn't matter which actor portrayed him.