Average ACT Scores Drop to Their Lowest Point in Three Decades
"The score decline really reflects students' lack of access to a rigorous high school curriculum," says the senior director for state partnerships at ACT.

It seems many American high schoolers are not just unprepared for college; it appears they also lack the basic knowledge a high school education is meant to provide.
According to a recent report examining national ACT scores, American high school students' ACT scores have dropped dramatically in the past year. The released data highlights the staggering fact that few high school students, even before the pandemic, are academically prepared to attend college. While the most recent decline shows the impact of COVID-era school closures on students' learning, consistently low scores draw attention to the fundamental flaws at the core of many of America's government-run schools.
The ACT, along with the SAT, is a college entrance exam used to measure students' preparedness for undergraduate study at American universities. The test is broken down into four sections, covering reading, math, science, and English. Each section is awarded a score from 1 to 36, and the rounded average of the four scores is recorded as the student's "composite score." The test is most popular in the South and Midwest, while the SAT is preferred in east and west coast states (though it is common for motivated students to take both tests). While many colleges have dropped the test in recent years, citing equity and diversity concerns, the ACT and SAT remain cornerstones of the college application process—as well as commonly utilized measures of whether a student is academically prepared for college.
On Wednesday, the ACT, formerly the American College Test, released a report examining test takers' performance over the past year. The average ACT score has consistently hovered just above 21 for the last decade. However, a steady decline began after the pandemic, with the average score falling to 20.3 in 2021 and 19.8 in 2022. The 2022 drop was particularly stark, as the half-point decline from 2021 marked the decade's largest one-year drop in scores. According to the Associated Press, 2022 marks the first year since 1991 that the average ACT score dipped below 20.
While recent declines in student performance may appear small, its impact is a telltale sign of trouble in American high schools. "When we're talking about over a million students, then seeing a half-point drop in one year is a big decline… We haven't seen a change like that in the last 10 years or even in the last 30 years," Rose Babington, senior director for state partnerships at ACT, tells Reason. "Seeing a change that's not just 0.1 or 0.2 points from year to year is something that is definitely, definitely something we're paying attention to. That being said," she continued, "looking back to the past decade, two decades, three decades, this is part of a trend that, while more severe this year, has been happening for a long time."
There was also a drop in the percentage of students meeting the ACT's "College Readiness Benchmarks." These benchmarks are minimum scores in each subject area, which are statistically correlated with success in freshman-level college courses. For example, a student must score at least a 22 on the mathematics section to meet the minimum level linked to success in college-level algebra. The percentage of students meeting all four benchmarks is down from 25 percent in 2021 to 22 percent in 2022 —also the largest decline of the decade. In all, 42 percent of test-takers met no ACT College Readiness Benchmarks in 2022.
"The score decline really reflects students' lack of access to a rigorous high school curriculum… The scores themselves are really a direct reflection of the standards and skills that we want students to have to be successful in their freshman college courses," Babington says. "So for us, the declines are telling this bigger story, that a lot of students don't have access to the level of rigor that we'd like them to in high school." She says this is especially true for low-income students or those from rural areas.
The low percentage of high school students meeting College Readiness Benchmarks is particularly concerning, especially as it appears that many students are attending four-year colleges despite not meeting the benchmarks. For example, in Alabama, only 15 percent of high school graduates met all four ACT College Readiness Benchmarks in 2020, yet 30 percent enrolled in a four-year college. This indicates that a significant proportion of Alabamian four-year college students were, in at least one core subject, unready to attend college by ACT measures.
It is incredibly troubling that thousands of American college students may be academically unprepared to succeed in higher education. Not only is this worrisome for the students themselves, who may end up dropping out of school because of academic struggles (while still being on the hook for some, if not all, of their student loans), but it also spells trouble for higher education as a whole, since universities might lower the rigor of many courses to avoid pushing students out.
The recent decline in ACT scores, coupled with their already staggeringly low pre-pandemic levels, shows just how deficient American schools are—particularly the government-run public schools which educate 91 percent of American students. For more students to succeed, we need to take a hard look at public schools and begin holding them to account for their failures.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Test scores are RACIST!!! The end!
Also… I was the first to post!!! That means that I am more racist than YOU are!!! Nanny-nanny-boo-boo on YOU!!!!
Double-triple-nipple nanny-nanny-boo-boo on YOU, Mammary-Necrophilia-Fuhrer from Inner Islamic Canuckistanistanistanistan!!!!
Feeling your wild nuts today, Sqrlsy?
No one else will. He's strictly self-serve.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-02) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
My intuitive psychic powers FEEEEEL InsaneTrollLogic lusting something Gawd-AWFUL, after feeling my wild nuts, yes!
(I would get out the Mazola Oil ass we speak, except that I suspect that InsaneTrollLogic can NOT be trusted! InsaneTrollLogic is BUSTED! I'm disgusted! InsaneTrollLogic is BEYOND THE BEYOND when it cums to being trusted with MY nuts!!!)
Shorter for the reading impaired... You're busted! I'm disgusted! You can't be trusted, you ho of the mo of the bro!
Yes, that's our local nutter. CrazySqrlsyMad.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this site.. http://www.Profit97.com
Cue swan dive into Brunswick stew.
"First post" doesn't count unless it is the first post. Yours is the edited first post and that doesn't count.
He just wanted to make sure he had the right amount of crazy int he post. Not too little, mind you.
I actually edited it TWICE, ass an experiment! It WORKED!!! (Within a 5-minute window... No bets beyond that.)
Yes, an ass experiment, obviously.
Is he eating soft-serve straight from the faucet again?
Yes, Shrike's faucet.
"The score decline really reflects students' lack of access to a rigorous high school curriculum"
*** rising intonation ***
or the test being made more difficult.
Another explanation might be students' use of energy drinks causing bladder distress during the exam.
That should actually make the scores go up, because of cheating opportunity.
Expecting students to be able to read, understand, and select one "correct" answer is just a reflection of white supremacy and its obsession with objectivity and scientific method. Obviously the tests need to be decolonialized in order to center ancestral ways of knowing. And we need more equitable antiracist scoring that confiscates 10 points from white students and awards them to BIPOC students.
"antiracist scoring that confiscates 10 points from white students and awards them to BIPOC students"
That's what the Postal Service does.
It is unfair to compare today's kids to kids from a few decades ago. Kids today have to learn so much more.
Chemistry used to be so easy in my day. Earth, air, fire, water. Glad I never had to learn all the new-fangled "elements"
Carbon, my ass!
When you consider all the new genders and their place in the oppression hierarchy, yes. Given that it's mo wonder they cannot read or write...by design.
Locking high school students out of schools for almost 2 years and trying to teach via Zoom meeting just for the sake of the teachers' unions does tend to lower test scores. The bigger surprise is why anyone is surprised.
That and forcing all subjects through a racial equity lens. If the ACT hasn't properly adjusted for everyone being a victim of some kind or another that would explain it. It's 2022 and we know it's not fair to hold everyone to some objective standard, you have to coddle people based on their background.
If only you could test for right think.
Unfortunately, the only method we have is to just kill off all the wrongthink.
I laugh at the ACT and SAT. When I took the SATs, there were five tests I wanted to take, but you had to buy them in threes, so I added Math II. One question I guessed at, asked my teacher afterwards, and I had picked the wrong answer. There were also a lot of unanswered questions.
Months later the counselor called me in, said I had a perfect 800 on the Math II test (but not Math I). I said no, explained, he asked them to hand check it, they said yes, I got 800.
I have never respected a test less, not even the 2nd/3d grade penmanship test I flunked because the clicky ballpoint pen latch had broken and I had to write the entire test with my thumb holding the button down.
I always kind of enjoyed SATs and other tests like that.
A fun way to spend a day.
A Saturday Afternoon Test.
Your anecdote is not a fair criticism of the exam. Standardized testing services are constantly updating the exam questions. If they simply reused the same ones year after year, they’d be too easy to cheat. But you can’t just change the exam entirely without losing your ability to compare results from year to year. The exam makers solve this by adding some new questions (by some estimates, 10%) and trying them for a few years to see if they are equivalent predictors of scores with the old questions. But because they’re test questions (that is, not yet proven effective or even answerable), they are excluded from your personal score.
So yeah, it’s entirely possible to get one of those test questions wrong but still get a perfect score on all the exam questions that are actually counted.
Or they just give everyone 100 points:
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-06-02-me-12316-story.html
So yeah, it’s entirely possible to get one of those test questions wrong but still get a perfect score on all the exam questions that are actually counted.
It’s almost a joke, but without any winky emojis or whatever it’s just retarded nonsense. The SAT is 1600 points, 800 math, 800 read/write. It used to be, since calculators, that there were two math sections and the 800 is derived directly from the sum total of correct answers of both sections cumulatively. So, no way to get an 800 on Math II, but not Math I without being mistaken or disingenuous. Even if I’m wrong and he took it some place else or took it under a different format at a different time, it has, since forever, been 800 math and 800 reading/writing and the scoring was never ‘pick and choose’. You either got all the math question right, regardless of test or section and got an 800 or you didn’t. “800 on Math II but not Math I” implies either the ability to get above an 800 on the math section (which has never been possible) or that the 800 to which he's referring is a meaningless factor or percentage of the actual 800 that goes into your score.
I said it was a joke because it almost seems like he’s saying not only did he fail the math section, he failed the reading/writing sections too. Like a goofy kid who confused “100/200” with “100%” and is telling everybody he got a perfect score and the test was easy.
When I took it the scores weren't adjusted by 100 points to renormalize them to how poorly kids are doing now.
Also, they switched away from the 'guessing penalty', which was an absolutely brilliant way to stratify people who knew absolutely nothing from people who were able to figure out that one or two of the multiple choice options were wrong from people who knew every correct answer.
I have found from taking about a jillion tests that the best ways to demonstrate some kind of knowledge:
Essay
Fill in the blank
'Thorough' multiple choice: A-H. A only, B only, C only, D only, E (A+B), F (A,B,and C), G(All ABCD), H(None of the above).
The bottom two easier to grade, the first definitely time consuming to grade but demonstrates understanding and ability to communicate. Many courses I took that were on the harder side used the above, and most students absolutely hated it.
A-D multiple choice is about the easiest a test can be. A free 25% chance, often with teachers including a blatantly false answer which puts you up to 33%, and figuring out the correct answer ends up being a pretty fun game with just minimal knowledge in an area. A-H is far superior even though not perfect.
Hilariously the gross anatomy I took in undergrad (we were lucky to have it offered) was taught by an old hardass who only did fill in the blank (the way it should be). Pin the structure, identify what is pinned. Spelling needed to be perfect of no partial. Gross anatomy practical tests in my med school was embarrassingly A-D multiple choice, which I distinctly felt at the time was a cop out and BS way to test anatomy. I was happy to have been fortunate enough to already take it the 'real' way, and the A-D tests felt like childsplay at that point.
I am rambling now
Your thorough multiple choice becomes just as trivial as a standard A-D with the inclusion of an obvious wrong answer, because it lets you eliminate as many as 4 answers, again brining the chances of a guess up to 25%
Also, he doesn't seem to understand the test and misinterpreted my point whether they dropped penalty scoring or shifted from A-H to A-D multiple choice, they only diminished the test's descriptive power without really expanding it's ability.
The SAT has to cover near-illiterate students, whether that's because of actual infirmity or because they're the product of a 3rd-grade education system, up to upper crust collegiate candidates; and it only has to do it with regard to reading/writing and arithmetic. Essays don't stratify kids who nearly can't read/write among kids who can. I don't at all disagree that A-H would differentiate HS Jrs. and Srs. better than A-D, it would even probably be effective down in to 3rd and 4th graders, but A-H is a lot more difficult conceptually for a 3rd grader than A-D. We may disagree whether the added difficulty is worth the more informative result but, whether the test moves from A-H -> A-D or penalty-scoring -> no penalty scoring, we agree that information is being lost. My point, in the case of penalty scoring, the information was gained at no added cost of complexity to the test subject.
Sorry, my point really was a rambly one, not meant to be a response or argument to yours. It really should have been an unrelated separate post. Yours just made me think of it.
"Your thorough multiple choice becomes just as trivial as a standard A-D with the inclusion of an obvious wrong answer"
LOL, ya, no. They aren't the same difficulty level.
Obvious answer D is not true. That would leave you A only, B only, C only, A+B, A,B,+C, and none of the above (1/6 chance). It makes you need to know if each individual answer is actually true or false. A-D standard test, the assumption is that only one answer is 'correct'.
If you cant see how different these two things are, it is unlikely you have taken many tests, or done well on them.
>>For more students to succeed, we need to take a hard look at public schools and
sell them to private investors
golf clap
Speak to the "writing" requirement. IIRC, Stanford University was the first CA institution forced to utilize "remedial composition" courses (widely still referred to as "bonehead English") at the university level because those coming out high school weren't properly prepared. It was to be a temporary program until the public schools "caught up." That was in 1906.
But their SEL scores are through the roof!
*checks levels of anxity, depression, and suicide rates
OH wait sel has nothing to do with that and it's just Marxist programming, okay carry on
I never buy a car with a trim level below SEL, does may mean I have a high SEL score?
>>used to measure students' preparedness for undergraduate study at American universities
provided they goto class & study. trust me lol
Wondering where this country's half-educated dopes are concentrated?
Interested in whether Republicans are as poorly educated as most people assume them to be?
Looking for a handy source to forecast which states are going to continue to decay?
Here's something right-wingers hate: List of states ranked by educational attainment.
Republicans tend to be ignorant losers residing in half-educated dumps. But they make up for that with delusion, bigotry, and a taste for street pills, guns, and faith healing.
Interested in whether Republicans are as poorly educated as most people assume them to be?
Funny, I've haver had a problem where I said "what I really need is an Oberlin grad with a women's studies degree".
Yeah, I'm sure the junkies and Pentecostals are really driving the politics of red states.
Now let's talk the graduation rate from Chicago Public Schools, asshat. There's no Republicans involved in that whatsoever.
"Wondering where this country’s half-educated dopes are concentrated?"
Wherever you live, shit-for-brains.
Mocking half-educated, superstitious, bigoted, stupid right-wingers never gets old.
Unfortunately, we'll only have the clingers around to make fun of and look down until replacement. By their betters.
The subroutine who's stuck to this place like a gecko in a plastic wrap factory talking about clingers.
You never answered the question, dipshit.
Should we tell him about that one school at Baltimore?
Is knowledge America’s strength? No! It’s diversity. So who cares about any of this so long as our diversity goes up.
Diversity is racist. Why should BIPOCs be forced to sit next to their white oppressors in an algebra class?
I blame Tik Tok and Twitter.
Post your score!
28
2040
Oh, wait. That was my GRE score.
Don't recall my SAT, but it was somewhat less impressive. 1100 or so.
32, but I was kinda hungover and didn't finish the math section.
This was before the allowed calculators.
33. I never did like how getting one question wrong in Science dropped that sub-score from 36 to 33. If I had got a 35 or 34 there, my overall would have been 34. (This kind of confuses me about the scores dropping; I thought they were normalized.)
I heard that one person in my class assumed they had the highest score in my high school when they got a 32. When they heard about my score, they decided to retake the test. Never heard how that turned out for them, though. (If you retake you have no recourse to the old score; you get the most recent result no matter if it's better or worse.)
I'm also going to say that referring to "high school graduates" in the article is a bit misleading. It's often taken during junior year; at the latest you'd take it right at the beginning of senior year. So any learning done during senior year wouldn't be reflected.
The recent specific focus on ACT scores has been interesting to me. I dont know if it was just the time I took them, but it was rare for people to take the ACT.
Honestly most of the time the people taking them were doing so because their SAT score was kind of crappy so they wanted to 'prove' themselves.
It wasnt required that we take it, and I can only think of a couple kids that even took the ACT, our school pretty much all just took the SAT
It depends where you're from. In the midwest the ACT is more common and not many take the SAT. In the end, it's really a matter of what your universities of choice require for admission.
0
Never took any of those tests. I went to the school of Hard Knocks. I got a PhD in the streets.
I can't wait for Reason to defend J6 Committee trying to force Trump to testify in a live hearing after they've said how they were useless clownshows for decades.
Like divided government, these aren't normal times. In abnormal times, libertarianism needs to take a back seat.
Well I for one am shocked to learn that public education has somehow failed to reach America's future leaders. I mean they've utilized every fad curriculum and pedagogy they could pull out of their asses. But these brats just won't respond. Kids these days.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-22] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE........>>> OnlineCareer1
Yo, Emma, you gonna talk about the explosive COVID scandal making the global news that reared its head in Europe which directly resulted in this crappitude?
"The score decline really reflects students' lack of access to a rigorous high school curriculum,"
I don't know about that, when I was in school the subject of having your genitals scrambled never came up, which I would think would be pretty damn rigorous.
From go woke go broke to go woke become a dope!
Academic rigor = some race performs better than others.
So yeah, we can't have that. Either everyone gets As for everyone gets F.
In the late 90s I tutored math to college students (I was also a student) at a medium sized, not terribly selective state college.
Effectively, I had to go back and teach my tutees things like adding fractions and other grade school concepts. Surprisingly, many of them caught up quickly with the (still easier than calculus) courses they were taking
This is Biden's fault, isn't it?
Not Biden solely. Democrats though, definitely.
He certainly isn’t blameless for endorsing the party that initiated all this trouble, that’s for sure. The Biden administration itself doesn't look like it'll do anything to fix the issues.
Anyone who has followed the sub-mediocre 50 years of Biden knows he is STUPID and he is LAZY. Those are his root vices.
Bottom 10 of his Law School class. So uneducated he didn't blink in giving a complete speech on the OMNIcron virus. Which of course, were it OMNI, would be time to just roll over and die -- OMNI meaning ALL to anyone who is not a victim of being STUPID AND LAZY
Who cares about their test scores, are they well versed, in touch with and constantly experimenting with their gender identity? That and the rest of the marxist indoctrination is what schools are all about these days and if libsoftiktok is any indication they are crushing it on that front.
By the time kids get to HS they are already so far behind you can not functionally have a rigorous class. I teach HS history... and I am teaching kids things like what a aircraft carrier is (it is in the name!) so I can explain the Battle of Midway. I had a student ask if George Washington was still alive.
My kids refuse to actually read. They read questions first then skim text looking for key words then just copy/paste text from the reading the answer (usually getting it wrong because the question is about drawing inferences from the text). When I bring this up I am told I should teach "reading strategies." Like one more gimmick is going to help these kids when the problem is not inate ability/potential but inhate hatred of knowledge in the first place.
They actively fight against learning. Expressly and actively. And if I start putting in Fs for these kids my boss wants to know why I haven't worked myself to the bone and beyond to be a better teacher and teach them to read (never mind that I am their history teacher and not their English teacher). So there is institutional pressure to pass these kids on or work infinity times more than what my pay or body can handle with children who would only fight harder against learning.
And the same was the problem with the kids and their teacher the year before me. And the year before that. And before that.
The problem is not in HS. The problem is merely manifesting itself there. The problem is at home, at the institutional level (chasing school report card numbers rather than education, chasing pedagogy rather than expectations of knowledge, and a move away from "teachers teach, students learn" and there being accountability for both parts), and in society at large not valuing academic fortitude/commitment/curiosity with a hard beliefe in "right" and "wrong" answers (sometimes there may be multiple right answers... but there usually still exists solidly wrong answers to the same question).
We tell kids not to worry about what others think of them... so there is no shame/pride in knowing anything. Kids see easy money all over the place (esp my students who often work in family restaurants or construction making surprisingly good money) with no academic requirements. We no longer call the stupid stupid, the ignorant ignorant, or praise the smart. There is no shame in being ignorant (and perhaps there shouldn't be... we all start that way) or in being stupid (there is no excuse for being stupid at a most basic level yet in today's world we try and alleviate any problems that come from such a life choice plus try to pawn of responsibility to everyone but the person who refused to take advantage of the myriad opportunities provided to them to learn).
Clearly the answer is to put funding back to where it was 30 years ago?
This is nothing new.
Travel with me back to 1970.
I was involved in installing one of the first "automated" job-to-applicant matching programs, funded by the Department of Labor through state employment departments.
The first step involved taking all the job opening forms and formatting them for input to the system. One of the biggest changes involved changing the old requirement "high school graduate" to the computer code "RW", meaning they could read and write well enough to do the job.
This was because being a high school graduate did not mean they could read and write.
Yes, 1970; half a century ago.
Pardon me, but I disagree. The decline has very little to do with students' lack of access to a rigorous curriculum.
The decline has everything to due with the fact that we are all now victims and bloody lazy.... You pick your poison, too many to name.
WTF, I'm 66 years old and love Khan Academy and still purchase new editions of my favorite college English handbooks! Big hint here: Your degree in 16th Century Lesbian Poetry is useless....
Cheers
While many colleges have dropped the test in recent years, citing equity and diversity concerns, the ACT and SAT remain cornerstones of the college application process
How to say 'certain minorities are stupid and need a white savior' without outright saying it.
God damn, the the shit these people say astounds me. The fact they get away with it by using the right key words is perhaps even more amazing, and shows how few people learned critical thinking in college let alone high school.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-22] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE........>>> OnlineCareer1
*Commie* – Education fails again?? Is that suppose to be news?
I guess Gov-GUNS weren’t the right ‘tool’ to teach children after all.
I have been associated with Catholic seminaries for 10 years and this year sees the introduction of the Propadeutic Year, a year before the actual seminary to see whether it's for you.
But my concern is that already-behind students (who will be in training for 7 years taking Philosophy and Theology) will be even more handicapped by the delay in studies.
Like telling fat people to eat what you want for a year and think over how seriously you want to diet.
No, no. 1985 is **next** year...
I graduated high school in 85. Dodged many subsequent bullets that way.
I see what you did there. And filed the appropriate report.