Biden's Student Loan Debt Forgiveness Plan Now Estimated To Cost $400 Billion
According to a new report for the Congressional Budget Office, student loan debt forgiveness will likely completely wipe out gains made by the Inflation Reduction Act—and then some.

President Joe Biden's sweeping student loan forgiveness plan will wipe all the budget savings created by the Inflation Reduction Act—and then some.
In a letter published on Monday, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan federal agency, estimated that Biden's student loan debt forgiveness plan will increase the cost of student loans by $400 billion. That's more than the White House originally projected, and it means that the fiscally imprudent debt relief effort will end up swamping the modest budgetary savings achieved by last month's passage of the Inflation Reduction Act by more than $150 billion.
The letter notes that this cost is calculated by comparing borrowers' "projected repayments of student debt before accounting for the cancellation minus the present value of repayments after doing so." To get the $400 billion estimate, the CBO estimated that 95 percent of borrowers would be eligible for loan forgiveness and 90 percent of eligible borrowers would apply for forgiveness.
Biden's student loan debt forgiveness measures, which were announced last month, would forgive up to $10,000 for most borrowers making under $125,000 annually and married couples making less than $250,000. For borrowers who received a Pell Grant, forgiveness is increased to $20,000.
If anything, the CBO's estimates might lowball the true cost. That's because its estimates do not include possible effects of Biden's reconfiguration of income-driven repayment plans which would set eligibility for repayment at 225 percent of the federal poverty level, limit payments to just 5 percent of borrowers' income, and forgive remaining debt after 10 years of payment. This is a radical change, as most current plans start repayment at 150 percent of the federal poverty level, set payments at 10 percent of a borrower's income, and forgive loans after 20 years of payments.
That's likely why the CBO's estimate of the cost of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan is slightly more conservative than other predictions. The Penn Wharton Budget Model, a fiscal policy think tank housed at the University of Pennsylvania, places the cost of student loan forgiveness at between $469 billion to $519 billion over 10 years.
Penn Wharton also notes that, depending on the precise details of future income-driven repayment plans and increased participation rates, the new income-driven repayment plan could add another $450 billion in cost, bringing the total cost of Biden's plan to over $1 trillion.
Similarly, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget announced on Monday that it now estimates that the cost of Biden's plan—including IDR changes—could total between $500 and $650 billion.
If the CBO and Penn Wharton's estimates are correct, then Biden's student loan debt forgiveness plan will effectively wipe out the estimated $238 billion reduction in the national deficit made by the Inflation reduction act. In fact, the plan is likely to massively increase the national deficit by over $150 billion. Student loan forgiveness stands to be a massively expensive project—one that not only erases recent gains in spending reduction but manages to make the problem significantly worse than the status quo.
"As CBO's estimates help confirm, the President's student debt plan would wipe out the ten-year savings from the Inflation Reduction Act twice over, worsen inflationary pressures, and deliver benefits to millions of Americans with advanced degrees in upper-income households," wrote Maya MacGuineas, the president of the Committee for a Responsible Budget. "This might be the most costly executive action in history."
However, Biden administration officials argue that cost estimates for student loan forgiveness are too high. Instead, the White House estimates that the program will cost taxpayers $240 billion over the next decade—assuming that only 75 percent of eligible borrowers participate in the program. The Biden administration is yet to release a detailed explanation of its estimate, though according to USA Today, officials wrote in a memo that "we would be thrilled if 90% of eligible middle- and low-income Americans applied for this program . . . But unfortunately, that's unlikely based on the data from other programs." Notably, no other loan forgiveness programs have gained as much media attention as this latest spate of forgiveness, making an only 75 percent uptake seem unlikely.
Even if the Biden administration is somehow correct and the loan forgiveness plan only ends up costing around $240 billion, the program would still end up negating projected gains from the Inflation Reduction Act. Further, the plan would still leave nothing in place to actually reduce the rate at which Americans are accruing student loan debt—a fact that might "necessitate" further rounds of debt forgiveness in the future.
This latest estimate from the CBO is yet another reason to believe that Biden's student loan forgiveness plan is going to spell fiscal disaster. Not only will the program wipe out possible gains from the Inflation Reduction Act, but it will also go further and increase the deficit by over $150 billion. The real solution to this problem is to create a plan that will actually reduce the amount that students are borrowing to attend college.
Rather than taking the harder, more effective path, the Biden administration seems dead set on taking a ridiculously expensive and ultimately ineffective approach to tackle the student debt crisis.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's not the just the costs of it, it's the fundamental unfairness of it.
And unconstitutional.
So Biden's 3 main weapons are increased cost, fundamental unfairness, unconstitutional edicts and an almost fanatical devotion to Obama... Our four...
Everyone expected the Biden doj inquisition!
Wouldn’t the FBI be the Inquisition?
Edit: Just because I can.
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend persuaded (emu-047) me to take the opportunity after telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
…..
——————————>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
No one expects it
We can fix that.
Just give me $10K of tax debt relief. I can skip a couple of quarterlies and run up a debt, then Biden can pay it off and I'll totes not complain.
I mean, what the fuck do I care? I don't have grandkids.
He’s rewarding his constituency. De Croats have no morals or integrity. This is what appeals to sociopathic narcissists like Tony.
Joey is so god damn dumb that not a whisper from him should be taken as anything but moronic nonsense.
Only $400 billion?
Fatass Donnie says "HOLD MY BEER!"
How much money did Trump put into forgiving student loans? Must have been over 400k otherwise your comment wouldn't make any sense at all.
Zero.
But he liked to spend the money - over $3 trillion in new programs.
He does call himself "The King of Debt".
Real estate developers borrow lots of money.
More news at 11
So entirely irrelevant when trying to compare him to Biden in this context. Got it. Thanks for the clarification.
Okay. Biden is awful and blew $400 billion on a lame student loan forgiveness program.
Trump just blew over $3 trillion of future taxpayer money on other stuff.
But they're not the same thing. Different stuff we didn't need. Completely different.
I didn't realize that the ONLY thing the Biden administration had spent a dime on was English Major Loan forgiveness. There Biden has been sitting, eating his tapioca and watching Matlock, and every time one of his zoomer interns said, "Grandpa, can we have some money for..." he shakes his cane at them and says, "No!" Only when one of his zoomer interns said, "Grandpa, I don't want to make my student loan payment this month because I need that money for Coachella" did he finally open up the wallet.
That's your argument. Literally.
How does Shreek think this idiot argument of his will succeed? Plus, he’s a pedophile.
Bullshit. The $3 trillion increase in the national debt during the Trump administration was passed by Congress; Trump didn't "blow" that money.
Biden is unilaterally responsible for student loan forgiveness, saddling the US with that additional expense without any congressional oversight. And it's likely going to be close to $1 trillion than $400 billion.
You misunderstand.
I was referring to the $2.1 trillion CARES Act and the $900 billion PPP - among other programs he passed.
It's called the CARES Act because it was passed by Congress. Ditto for PPP.
With veto proof majorities. Although he should have vetoed them both on principle, it wouldn’t have mattered, and the traitor media would have torn him apart over it. So now cunts like Shreek blame him for not putting up token resistance.
It’s disingenuous bullshit that he shitposts every day. He’s also a pedophile.
You were banned for posting links to kiddie porn links. Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.
Remind me again how Donald Trump wrote the CARES Act and not Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
...and Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy and 99% of both Team Red and Team Blue and signed by Trump...
funny how you left all that out
Right, so Biden hands out a sop to failed English majors while telling construction workers to go pound sand (*checks notes... party of the working class... kay... scratches that out*) which literally is designed to make the problem worse, and you compare that to the Trump era overall spending-- which congress controls-- a congress which was controlled by your party.
What problem? Inflation? We'll be deep into a recession and lower prices overall if and when any loan forgiveness happens.
Don't attempt revisionism on me. Trump lobbied for a HUGE relief package during his reelection year of 2020.
If Biden had handed out loan forgiveness to construction workers who took out small business loans, I'd only be giving you half the eye-rolling. But because he's handing it to the very people who neither need it, nor deserve it, you're getting full eye-roll.
If Biden had handed out loan forgiveness to construction workers who took out small business loans, I’d only be giving you half the eye-rolling.
What happened to “fuck you cut spending”?
Oh wait I know, it’s will-to-power national conservatism.
Why cut spending when your team can use the spending to pwn the libs? Just like they do? I mean, if their tribe can spend the nation into bankruptcy to reward their friends, then it’s only fair that your tribe be entitled to do the same thing, right? Well, except for the whole bankruptcy part. But who really cares about that, when there's libs to pwn?
Mr. Anti-Rightist is "BOF SIDEZ!" when it's convenient for him to be so.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a TDS-addled pile of shit, kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Fuck off and die, turd.
Check back after this year's deficit is tallied up.
Because last year the government was rolling in tax revenues.
This year lots of people have capital losses instead.
After observing your #DefendBidenAtAllCosts approach for almost two years, I have decided your posts can be broken down into 3 main categories.
Category A involves stopping short of endorsing a particular Biden policy — but immediately changing the subject to Trump or Bush.
Category B consists of all-caps catchphrases intended to shut down unfavorable coverage of Biden: SLOPPY PULLOUT! HAPERINFLATION!
Category C is the use of esoteric data points to prove the Biden economy is better than the Peanuts realize: Hey look here, rig count is up, Biden is doing great.
So ....... thanks for this demonstration of a Mr. Buttplug #DefendBidenAtAllCosts Category A post. I think those are my favorite. 🙂
#LibertariansForBiden
Only three?
Category D - lowering the expectations on Biden by saying things like "Biden is in over his head" and "I can't think of a single piece of legislation of his I support" so that he looks like other failed presidents. IOW - Comparatively equal.
Of course, there's Category E - Those which get deleted and get the entire thread nuked due to posting verboten links, pedophile.
You do most of the work for us OBL; my sincerest thanks for the troll spotting you provide. Honestly, I just don't have the stomach for doing things like picking up roadkill on a hot day.
Nailed it.
Category C: 'Esoteric' data points that it doesn't understand, and citations that don't support its argument. Usually followed by a series of deflections, gaslighting, and the like.
Dissemble, deflect, distract. When desperate, engage in all 3 at once.
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
#FillingInForOvert
Is there any issue where you don't go, "but Trump!?"
… gains made by the Inflation Reduction Act
LOL
Yeah I see the line a lot and it always makes me laugh.
Totally not a Party mouthpiece.
Yeah, I was going to point this out, as well. There are NO gains from Fed government spending. PERIOD.
Emma, if you give me a PO Box, I'll ship you a Milton Friedman book for Christmas. You can start your journey to properly understanding how to be a Libertarian.
Nobody could possibly believe this. So why do they say it? You could say the Dow is up 20k since Brandon took office and it would be just as true.
Still have yet to see an article mentioning the fact that this loan forgiveness applies only to loans still owned by the federal government. So if you were smart and consolidated into a low-interest private loan, no forgiveness for you. Yet nobody mentions it.
You mean here at Reason? That's possible, but I've definitely seen it reported elsewhere. But I get most of my news from Youtube randos. Seriously. That's why I knew there was going to be a massive trucker protest in Ottawa three weeks before the regular media mentioned it.
I think the courts will kill it.
It's a brazenly obvious political move timed for the mid-terms and the ruling will be after Nov 6.
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
#FillingInForOvert
We must never forget he’s a pedo, and never let it slide.
WTF?
Reason: The Titanic hit an iceberg and sank stranding too many passengers in too few lifeboats in the middle of the freezing North Atlantic!
Sarcasmic: My Auntie survived the Titanic. She got food poisoning before the accident. How come nobody is talking about making sure the staff on those ships wash their hands?
Sarc's point is eminently reasonable. You're fucked out of student-loan forgiveness for the crime of refinancing through a private lender to get a lower interest rate. Ditto if you've been diligently paying your loans or even paid them off completely.
It's such a blatantly unfair move and such transparent vote-buying that the whole administration needs to be run out of town on a rail.
Sarc’s point is eminently reasonable.
Tell me you don't visit the Reason comments often without telling me.
Sarc is a little bitch. He previously claimed that he refinanced his loans and he is belaboring the point to seek validation like he always does. It is not an argument from principle. It is an attention seeking distraction. It is no more constructive than a discussion about a bad shrimp served on the Titanic.
By the way Sarc, that contains an actual ad hominem. See if you can identify it.
"By the way Sarc, that contains an actual ad hominem. See if you can identify it."
Now you're going to confuse him.
Sarc only cares about the issue because he doesn't get the 10k handout. He first brought it up with a "my friend" story before admitting it was his story. He was hoping for free money because he isnt principled. He also compares the loan handout to tax cuts which is hilarious. He can't comprehend the issue outside of how it affects him.
Severe alcoholism hasn’t helped him.
The only one who cares about this is you because you got fucked when you chose Biden. Most of us are laughing at you. You chose to do things like buy a new car instead of used when you could have paid down your loan debt. You choose to make min payments to pay more in interest in the long run. You getting fucked for your own personal choices is fucking hilarious.
I am sure this will also reduce inflation and eliminate the federal debt.
Are you f*cking kidding? What "gains" do you think is the so-called Inflation Reduction Act making?
Right; pretty much a boondoggle of Democrats wish lists, and there was no intention that it would actually do anything to reduce inflation or budget and certainly not the national debt.
Now pile this latest "flick of a pen" boondoggle on top of that and the train to destruction just picked up a shit load more steam.
Well, I'm sure Emma learned on Twitter that the Inflation Reduction Act is actually reducing inflation. Or maybe from one of her "completely not a far left progressive" professors.
They are counting on the 87,000 new IRS agents being able to squeeze more cash from taxpayers than it costs to fund them and their expense accounts and benefits.
OKay, Trump Cultists like Jesse, ML, etc.
You all keep saying Trump somehow got "tricked by Democrats into that monstrous CARES Act of 2020 and the $2.1 trillion handout. I called you on your bullshit.
So the Senate vote must have been along party lines.
Late in the night of March 25, 2020, the Senate passed the $2 trillion bill in a unanimous 96–0 vote. Four Republicans did not vote, namely John Thune, who was "feeling ill", Rand Paul (who had tested positive for COVID-19), and Mitt Romney and Mike Lee, who were both in isolation after having had contact with Senator Paul
and what did Donnie Boy have to say?
Donald Trump remarked upon passage of CARES in the Senate that "The Democrats have treated us fairly ... I really believe we've had a very good back-and-forth. And I say that with respect to [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer"
The Cult of Trump. They believe so much that just ain't so.
Wasn't there something else that occurred just before the CARES Act was passed? Something the act was supposed to address? It's all a bit fuzzy. There was definitely something about '2 weeks' and I remember feeling like I was suffocating all the time. Other than that, I can remember watching TV and being on the internet, but not much about what was going on at work or where I travelled.
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
Don't respond to SPB, just shun him.
#FillingInForOvert
"You all keep saying Trump somehow got “tricked by Democrats into that monstrous CARES Act of 2020 and the $2.1 trillion handout"
You always have to twist shit a little to fit your narrative. Nobody here said Trump got "tricked". He went along with the flow and even attacked Massie, which was stupid and wrong.
And it's no surprise, almost 3.3 million Americans filed for unemployment in the week ending March 21, "nearly five times more than the previous record of 695,000 set in 1982, and panic had set in.
What we do say however, is that your precious Pelosi and Schumer created the spending monstrosities, whenever you lie and try to pretend Trump wrote the act.
You're always trying to be tricky. Always trying to twist and lie and misattribute.
your precious Pelosi and Schumer created the spending monstrosities
...along with McConnell and McCarthy and 99% of Team Red and Team Blue...
funny how you leave that part out
Mr. Anti-Rightist is “BOF SIDEZ!” when it’s convenient for him to be so.
yup the Team Red morons around here will never admit that the $2 trillion monstrosity called the CARES act was an entirely bipartisan affair, in fact nearly unanimous. they want to simultaneously claim that it was all Team Blue's fault while trying to let Team Red, especially Trump, off the hook for his role.
yup the Team Red morons around here will never admit that the $2 trillion monstrosity called the CARES act was an entirely bipartisan affair,
Yeah, it’s not like it didn’t happen back when it was passed or anything, you stupid fat fuck.
Maybe if your diabetic ass wasn't so "anti-rightist," you might see that.
Actually, everyone here recognizes that. It's only people like you and SPB2 who keep pushing this false narrative.
Moreover, instead of properly contextualizing the Cares Act versus the spending that has occurred under Biden, you are being purposefully obtuse in order to create a false comparison.
I'm not a fan of the Cares Act, but when governments use their power to prevent people from making a living, governments are on the hook to help. I think everyone here would have preferred governments not preventing people from working and preferred the giant spending of the Cares Act not having happened.
The only one who seems to be a Trump cultist is you. I mean, you literally can't post without mentioning him. He seems to be occupying most of your daily thoughts.
"To get the $400 billion estimate..."
When was the last time the government estimates on spending have ever been remotely close to reality?
student loan debt forgiveness will likely completely wipe out gains made by the Inflation Reduction Act
LOL! Do you really want to stick with that answer? Didn't Reason debunk the idea that inflation can be outspent? Are we just supposed to ignore hundreds of years of experience with the decreased value of money over time?
Well, Obama and the Democrats say it works. Good enough for Reason Editors. And, Krugman. Don't forget him.
"With the flick of a pen, President Biden has taken a giant step forward in addressing the student debt crisis by cancelling significant amounts of student debt for millions of borrowers."
Chas. Schumer
Remember this. Because media sure as shit will not.
Courts have ruled that the outrageous promises made to the PEUs about guaranteed returns on pension funds invested in the stock market constituted an enforceable contract and required those pensions be funded by tax dollars. This is not substantially different in nature. The morons representing the government employers who agreed to those unconscionable terms had a lot less authority than the POTUS.
My guess is that regardless of the legality, Biden's statements of intent on behalf of his DoEd can and will be enforced by the courts. It is one thing to renege on a campaign promise. It is completely different to attempt to retroactively void an action of the Executive taken under the color of his authority. Just ask any of the third world shitholes we have bombed over the last 60 years.
The corrective action is impeachment of the President for taking actions that exceeded his constitutional authority. Which would be exquisite.
Just call an Inflation Reduction Order and it's good.
According to a new report for the Congressional Budget Office, student loan debt forgiveness will likely completely wipe out gains made by the Inflation Reduction Act
Gains? Is this like "the more you spend the more you save!" type of gains?
My SIL is talking about how she saves so much money with all these websites and deals. My BIL says, yeah, you’re going to save us right into bankruptcy.
Of course, he cannot just print more money and tax us with inflation like the Feds.
It's all just part of building the Nazi(National Socialist)-Empire.
US B.O.E., FAFSA, PELL, ...soon to come... Full-On Secondary and mandatory Commie-Education.
Because that's what Nazi's do.
who is dumb enough to think that the "inflation reduction act" was going to reduce inflation at all? It was clearly just a democratic wishlist that was named that just to show how little respect they have for the rest of us.
The democrat party should be eliminated. A lot of top democrats should be prosecuted too.
Be careful what you say. The FBI will be breaking your door in to arrest you and hold your family for hours while they rifle through your closets.
They will show up at 5:00 AM, 50 strong with two Bearcats a heli and CNN in tow.
Then you'll be sorry you ever said anything.
You do realize that federal student loan debt is money that is both issued and owed to the US Treasury? It's owed to ourselves, if they cross off the debt no one pays it, not the borrower, not the tax payer. It's money that only existed on paper as a line item. It's not like they took gold out of Ft Knox (if there's any really there).
All that really concerns anyone is the moral hazard, when it come right down to it. And I don't disagree. However, what's the long-term moral hazard of continuing to saddle people with unconscionable debt? You might argue that they shouldn't have taken it out to begin with, but as a society we've placed far too much emphasis on college as a necessity for all, when it's clearly not. People went there because WE collectively told them they HAVE to, and the government made it easy for them to 'afford' it, and easy for the institutions to increase tuitions because 'free money'. And the vast majority were poorly served in the process.
But fuck 'em, right?
“You do realize that federal student loan debt is money that is both issued and owed to the US Treasury? It’s owed to ourselves, if they cross off the debt no one pays it, not the borrower, not the tax payer. It’s money that only existed on paper as a line item.”
No. We don’t realize that because it’s not true.
People took out loans, spent the money and are now expecting the rest of us to pay back their loans. The money that was spent was spent on textbooks, housing, food and tuition. The tuition was paid to colleges who then spent it on things like teacher salaries. That was real money that was really spent. Those are real costs. They are not just paper costs. The borrowers said they’d pay that back, now they won’t. Everyone else will instead. Taxpayers will pay real money to cover this.
But, if you really think it’s no big deal, then you pay it.
^+10000 Well Said....
Chmeee paraphrased, "It's not like people work for fake-money!" /s
Well apparently in 'Chmeee' land nobody does; they just expect everyone else to.
Before you write, you may want to learn the difference between your opinion and facts.
Call it what it really is, not a "student loan forgiveness plan" but a "taxpayer funded student loan bailout".
And can just one person point out that spending 400 billion dollars of taxpayer money that Congress never authorized is one of the biggest "threats to democracy" ever enacted?
SITUS SLOT GACOR
https://www.bossini88.org/
https://about.me/nhyistana
SITUS SLOT GACOR INDONESIA
SITUS SLOT GACOR
SLOT GACOR
Expect it to be a lot more, I can't remember a CBO estimate that ever ended up coming in at or under the estimated costs.
C'mon man! That's like a drop in the bucket, Jack! Needz moar excuses to vote democrat in next election! /Reason writers
The only concern here is that this will give us less money to send to Hunter Biden's crack dealer, Zelensky.
Obviously, the most expensive bribe in history.
It looks like we won't have to spend our days and nights worrying about the economic consequences of Joebama's sudent loan forgiveness costs to the American people.
After blowing up Nordstream 1 and 2, Joebama has now started WW III. So the next sound you hear will be your own body disintegrating into radioactive ash.
Without a doubt the two explosions are courtesy the CIA, and Joebama. Of course it helps when the Navy SEALS are the go to boys for actually getting the act done.
Everyone with more than two working brain cells knows it was done, courtesy Washington. Putin certainly knows it. The German people certainly know it and the Scandinavians certainly know it.
Only the MSM are totally in the dark.
If Democrats want to win elections, the key is “offsetting” the costs. Simply ending the well-meaning but failed “War on Drugs” will net trillions of extra tax dollars over the coming years while stimulating the economy and increasing tax revenue.
Simply ending the illegal and unconstitutional “warrantless domestic spying” programs will raise trillions more wasted tax dollars and win votes! Voters of both parties hate these unconstitutional practices.
That’s the Democrats biggest problem, most government programs never ever shrink once started - they mission-creep past their original mission. Democrats should shrink or end bad programs then use that money for programs that benefit taxpayers.
The only 'benefit' GUNS create is to ensure Individual Liberty & Justice.
And Government isn't anything but a monopoly of gun force.