Biden Inadvertently Declares His Student Loan Forgiveness Program Illegal
If the pandemic is over, then how is the supposed emergency move justified?

In the summer of 2021, Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi offered the following response when asked about the president's power to unilaterally cancel student loan debt. "The president can't do it—so that's not even a discussion," she said. The president can delay repayment, as happened following the COVID-19 pandemic, she added, but, "it would take an act of Congress, not an executive order, to cancel student loan debt." That would seem to be that.
Yet roughly a year later, President Joe Biden did cancel up to $20,000 worth of student loan debt for most borrowers, and, in direct contradiction to Pelosi's pronouncement, he did it entirely via the executive branch. There was no act of Congress.
How exactly was this legal? What, exactly, gave the president authority to unilaterally cancel student debt?
The answer, it turned out, was the pandemic. As Reason's Damon Root wrote in August, when Biden announced his debt cancellation plan last month, administration lawyers cited the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students, or HEROES Act, of 2003, a post 9/11 law that "permits the Secretary of Education to waive or modify Federal student financial assistance program requirements to help students and their families or academic institutions affected by a war, other military operation, or national emergency."
The law was clearly intended as a vehicle to give the president the power to forgive student loan debt for individuals directly involved in fighting the war on terror. But in Biden's revisionist citation, it became an all-purpose tool for mass debt forgiveness via executive action, premised on the argument that the COVID-19 pandemic was an ongoing national emergency.
The pandemic, in this formulation, gave Biden extraordinary powers—powers that under normal circumstances the president would not have.
It was an inherently dubious justification, given the novel and expansive reading of the HEROES Act. But Biden completely undercut it on a 60 Minutes interview this weekend when he declared, flatly, that "the pandemic is over."
"The pandemic is over. We still have a problem with COVID. We're still doing a lot of work on it. But the pandemic is over," President Biden tells 60 Minutes in an interview in Detroit. https://t.co/7SixTE3OMT pic.twitter.com/s5fyjRpYuX
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) September 19, 2022
If the pandemic is over, then there is no ongoing national emergency, which means that the already shaky legal ground on which the Biden administration based its action has now collapsed entirely.
What's more, the administration had previously acknowledged that it lacked the legal standing to enact policy based on a pandemic emergency.
In a post flagging the legal implications of Biden's inconsistency, National Review's Charles Cooke notes that "in May, the Biden administration (correctly) reported that it was obliged to end the use of Title 42 of the 1944 Public Health Services Act at the border because the Covid-19 emergency had passed." The administration, in other words, had already concluded that the pandemic was no longer an emergency that justified extraordinary action months prior to the student loan forgiveness announcement. But that, of course, was a policy the Biden administration wanted to end. For legal purposes, the Biden administration's position was that the pandemic was over when it needed to be over, but ongoing when it needed to be ongoing.
The Biden administration's legal ground for canceling student debt via executive action was already poorly rationalized nonsense ginned up to enact a blatantly illegal policy that served as an expensive giveaway to Biden's voters. Biden's 60 Minutes interview shows that he cannot even be bothered to keep his shoddy story straight.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Awwwwwwwww c'mon, Reason. 🙁
Who cares if Biden's giveaway to his wealthy base is now harder to justify? Focus on what's important. A Republican governor of a large state, and serious 2024 contender, is literally guilty of HUMAN TRAFFICKING Brown bodies to Martha's Vineyard.
#DeSantisAboveAll
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. [res-01] This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article:>>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
Does that Depends-steeped cock appeal to you that much?
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend persuaded me to take the (afr-04) opportunity after telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
.....
——————————>>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
I thought you would of went with Biden shut down the virus, not the economy.
#PromisesMadePromisesKept
*would've
... gone
Biden = Retard
You obviously don't know what 'human trafficking' means.
I see you got your "talking points" for this week
The student debt forgiveness is blatantly illegal and simple pandering.
As for DeSantis shipping illegals to sanctuary cities, why/how is that any different than when the Biden regime does it? Oh wait, that's right, Biden does it under the cover of darkness and makes sure not to ship them to swanky addresses where "the beautiful people" live.
"Yet roughly a year later, President Joe Biden did cancel up to $20,000 worth of student loan debt for most borrowers, and, in direct contradiction to Pelosi's pronouncement, he did it entirely via the executive branch."
You're going to have to define "most" here. I refinanced mine into a single loan with a stupidly low interest rate, and I'm not eligible because the federal loan is paid off. Nor is anyone else who refinanced their federal loans. I tried a quick google to find some actual numbers on of how many borrowers refinanced and are thus ineligible, but the information I wanted didn't come up quickly. Not that important.
My only point is that it's misleading to say most borrowers are eligible. Only those who have not refinanced are eligible.
Or rather only those who have not refinanced are able to apply. I'm sure some nit-picking pedant will want to point out that people with federal loans can be disqualified because of income.
Lol. You told us you were looking for a friend last week then got angry when I called you out on it.
He said "for a friend" over and over and meant himself?
Why would they have to define mostly when it's not in the section you quoted?
Are you saying most borrowers have refinanced? Because I doubt that. Who's going to offer refinancing on someone's art studies degree?
It is not possible that Reason wrote an article like I just read. As we all know, tReason is a left-wing mouthpiece.
The usual suspects will not comment on this article. They can't. It doesn't exist.
This is not the same Reason they read because this Reason is not Leftist.
Reason criticized a Biden gaffe. My God they are just brutal here. Who are you fucking kidding here?
I see the usual gaggle of idiots here carrying water.
One of them was homeless. How stupid is that person? I mean, he was homeless. Doesn't matter what he says, you can just say he was homeless and drop the mic. So cool.
That’s about the sum of it.
It's reasonable to argue that they're not human.
Poor sarc.
One of them was homeless. How stupid is that person? I mean, he was homeless. Doesn't matter what he says, you can just say he was homeless and drop the mic. So cool.
I'm so old I remember sarc criticizing others for playing victim and acting a tween drama queen. Now we have sarc the eternal victim.
It’s because we broke him.
The guy who says he values honesty keeps spreading lies. He's like a walking Starburst commercial.
Oh look! The rage-oholic sees me making fun of people who think ad hominems are logical arguments and accuses me of playing victim!
What a retard.
You think ad home are logical.arguments?
Because they're not.
Why are you talking about yourself in the third person?
It's a tiny liberaltarian circle jerk.
Hey, you admit it’s libertarian.
Haha Dee, he said LIBERALtarian, you dope.
Tell the truth, bud. You don't value honesty. Not a bit. You only care about scoring points with the girls by hurling insults like a teenager. You'll lie all day long if it gains you status among the poo-flingers you call friends. Just admit it. It will be the only honest statement you ever made in these comments.
No, that would be you. R Mac has always been honest here.
So making a tepid criticism of a Biden gaffe makes it totally okay to write a completely ridiculous criticism of DiSantis. Biden plans to spend 1.5 trillion dollars without any approval from Congress. And all Reason can say is how he "may have admitted that was illegal".
Yeah that is some real hard hitting criticism there. Can you drop the Jacket's cock out of your mouth for a few seconds once in a while?
Great point. Should have written tepid criticism of DiSantis and completely ridiculous criticism of Biden. So biased. Unfair.
Back when I was on a team I'd take any criticism of my team to be promoting our rival. I've been there. I used to think that way. But then I stopped caring about who won. Once that happened I saw how criticism of X is simply criticism of X. It doesn't translate to "Hey! Archrival Y is great!" No. It's just criticism of X. That's it.
You are on a team. One full of leftist morons like yourself.
This thread you, Mike and brandy all rushed in to deflect. It is laughably predictable.
That's a kind of example. I was never that stupid and dishonest though. You got me beat there.
I choose not to comment on Suderman posts. Even if I have no issue with what he posted. I ask you to respect my focused hatred of Peter.
Understood. I do comment on Sullum articles occasionally but I don't ever read beyond the headline. I also hope that the commentariat can respect my principled stand.
There is no need to read past the headline with Sullum. It is TDS from start to finish.
Admittedly, the constant talk about cocktails is annoying. But worthy of hate?
Your remarks are certainly worthy of hate, that's for sure. Like lying about Ohio's abortion law.
https://reason.com/2022/07/14/novavax-approval-fda-covid-booster-shots-pandemic/
The Attorney General is not lying that abortion is permitted under certain circumstances. That's not "no exceptions" as you claim.
Oh boy, now Mike is doing it too. So original. Much funny.
You must be pretty far on the right wing yourself, to see Reason as leftist. It's clearly libertarian, always has been. That means there's overlap with the left and right, because some left-wing positions and some right-wing positions are libertarian.
He also stated that we would directly intervene if China attacks Taiwan.
China is churning out warships like nobody's business. We've got them beat technologically, but they've got more ships and are producing them at a greater rate. This could get messy.
Did he say which side he'd intervene on?
Zing!
You know, now that you mention it…
Ask Hunter.
Smartest guy he knows.
Just remember what Joe Biden's former boss had to say about him: "Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up."
I think that's all we really need to know about how Joe acts, talks, and will be.
I am just so grateful that we have a sane and predictable adult back in charge.
Google says 50 days till midterm election; but, I ask myself, what good is a Republican controlled House (or even Senate) if he’s going to legislate with “the flick of a pen?”
Wait. He forgave the debt before he said that so it's ok. And he didn't really man what it sounded like anyway.
You sound like you’re joking, but some liberal pundit will probably use that argument at some point.
Yes, I was joking. And yes, that will be part of the defense if anything is ever made out of it.
"Biden Inadvertently Declares His Student Loan Forgiveness Program Illegal"
This assumes that Biden can remember any executive orders he wrote. Or anything else more than twenty minutes after-the-fact, for that matter.
"Biden Inadvertently Declares His Student Loan Forgiveness Program Illegal"
Because saying "fuck you" to everyone who paid their loans would be unpresidential.
Joe Biden is a tyrant
Emergency or no emergency
Legal or illegal
Constitutional or not constitutional
None of these things matter to a fascist
totally figures Brandon would be the one to stop Brandon from helping a brother out this one time.
"The law is what I say it is, peasant."
Thus the COVID program was a gateway to a spending forgiveness program that could not had existed without the trojan hack.
"Vote for the illiterate -- they need an easy job."
The student loan situation was created partly by the pandemic. President Biden's action was totally legal.
The need for assisting students doesn't end just because the pandemic has
That's obviously false: borrowers didn't have to pay back anything during the pandemic, and their debts were incurred before the pandemic.
And that's obviously false too: student loan forgiveness doesn't actually "assist" students. Rather, it destroys the US educational system and causes prices to rise.
You don't even have to look that close.
This was a top progressive policy objective before the pandemic. Tying it to the pandemic is a transparent lie.
The specific authorizing act he cited is not valid if the pandemic emergency is over.
So, how much do you still owe for the 7/8ths of whatever degree you did not get?
Why does Biden need any justification? Congress isn't going to hold him accountable, so he can do pretty much whatever he wants to. The worst possible consequence is that some judge rules against him (in the unlikely event anybody can claim standing), and then he'll just try again.
I find that those who are getting free money from this find the program perfectly justifiable, while those getting shafted in some way find that they are more skeptical of it.
And in any case, there's no justification for how wrong it is.
Tony doesn’t see a problem with stealing from one group to benefit another. Especially him. Tony is a narcissistic sociopath.
We're all getting shafted by it - inflation sinks all boats.
"Congress isn't going to hold him accountable,"
That's what happens when you lose two senate seats in Georgia.
Even with those two seats, Republicans wouldn't have the votes to hold Biden accountable.
And Mitch McConnell doesn’t have the will, or the inclination.
Don't worry - the White House released a statement clarifying that the President doesn't make policy.
Don't watch what he says, watch what he does.
In other words, feel free to ignore him completely.
Fuck Joe Biden. 48 days.
I've yet to hear a convincing reason as to what is colloquially referred to as the student loan "crisis" cannot serve as the emergency basis for Biden's executive action. Regardless of whether it's good policy, I think it is obviously lawful under the relevant statutes and emergency powers that Congress has expressly delegated to the president.
Can't help but recall the conniption the Democrats threw when Trump tried to redirect a measly $8B to build a wall from the Pentagon to deal with an actual crisis.
The taxpayer funded loan payoff program was already illegal, pandemic or not, whether or not the President says so or not.
The President has no legal authority to spend 500 billion dollars on his own initiative. Congress has to write and pass all proposed spending bills.
Presidents of both parties have been blatantly violating the Constitution by legislating via executive order in recent years, but this unilateral student loan bailout by Joe Biden may be the most egregiously illegal such move yet, as this article documents.
Regardless of a president’s party however – Biden't predecessor was likewise guilty of the practice – it is doing more to undermine democracy in the United States and move the country toward one-man rule, than either the Capitol protest of January 6, 2021, or the Republican efforts to require ID in order to vote in various states.
"...or the Republican efforts to require ID in order to vote in various states..."
Happy to see electrons from you again, but care to explain why requiring voters to establish their ID is a problem?
Thanks for your appreciation! To address your question, government-issued IDs are controlled by government, and every use of them contributes to the State's ability to track, monitor, and thereby control people.
Even non-government IDs or other means of collecting Big Data on people may be swept up by those in power. How many non-government organizations are prepared to go to the mat to fight a government agency's demand to turn over information?
A better approach to ensure people don't vote multiple times in the same election would be for voters' fingers to be dipped in ink, as is done in a number of countries.
Did you notice Biden's old man shuffle? And the robotic way he blurted out, "The pandemic is over!"
Joe Biden is John Gill. See the 1968 STAR TREK episode "Patterns of Force."