ICE Almost Deported a 10-Year-Old Cancer Survivor and His Mom
They were ultimately allowed to stay. But it’s an example of ICE targeting nonviolent migrants after a federal judge blocked the Biden administration’s enforcement priorities.

When Carmen Goff received a letter from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) last month asking her to visit the agency's Memphis office, she didn't have cause for concern. It said she needed to provide new fingerprints, pictures, and documents and would be given new reporting dates. She and her 10-year-old son Brandon, who was previously a St. Jude cancer patient, had been diligently reporting to the ICE office since arriving in Memphis years prior. Their green card application was in progress.
The letter "didn't set off any alarm bells for me because they explicitly said for new reporting dates, meaning we're going to set you a future check-in date," says Lily Axelrod, an immigration attorney who represents the Goffs. "But that turned out to be a lie, and they had already had her deportation flight booked."
Carmen and Brandon came to the U.S. from Honduras in November 2016, requesting asylum after crossing the southern border. At that point, Brandon had recovered from leukemia, which he was diagnosed with at just 18 months old. Carmen sought better economic circumstances and a better medical system for her son, fearing his cancer would return. She also hoped to flee violence in Honduras: A gang had killed her stepfather when he refused to give them money, she told Memphis' The Commercial Appeal.
Immigration authorities gave her a court date and allowed her to move to join relatives in the Atlanta area. Unfortunately, Brandon's cancer returned. Carmen brought him to St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, which does not charge for treatment, and he eventually recovered. But their immigration status was on shaky ground.
"The judge did not grant her asylum case," says Axelrod, explaining that "it's pretty tough to win asylum cases" because "the law is a mess" and "the standard for evidence is extremely high." They didn't win their appeal either. "At that point, Carmen and her son Brandon had a final order of removal from the judge," Axelrod explains. "But the local ICE office, as they often do for cases that have some kind of a humanitarian element…allowed Carmen to have what's called an order of supervision."
Issued in 2019, that order allowed Carmen to stay in Memphis, keeping her son in treatment and the two of them out of ICE detention and deportation proceedings. It required her to complete regular check-ins with ICE and keep the agency apprised of new documents or addresses, which she did. In the meantime, Carmen met and married Jose Guerrero, a Venezuelan immigrant who recently naturalized as a U.S. citizen. The couple began to file the necessary paperwork for marriage-based immigration relief. Making good progress, the letter Carmen received on August 1 didn't seem like anything to worry about.
Carmen reported to the ICE office on August 11 with Brandon in tow. There, according to The Commercial Appeal, "officials told her to sign a document—she doesn't know what it said, because it was in English." The friend who had dropped Carmen and Brandon off became alarmed that they hadn't emerged from the office after several hours and that Carmen wasn't answering her cellphone. "We were able to check and confirm…that she had been detained," says Axelrod. "She and her son were held in the ICE office in Memphis for a while and were not allowed to contact an attorney or contact a family member."
Officials then took Carmen and Brandon to the Memphis airport, "where they told her that she was going to be flying to Texas"—but not that she and Brandon were being deported, Axelrod explains. Axelrod contacted someone high on the ICE chain of command in the region to note that agents had a St. Jude patient in custody. Axelrod sent ICE officials the family's latest documentation from St. Jude, where Brandon was still undergoing annual check-ups. That back-and-forth culminated in ICE letting Carmen and Brandon go home that evening.
"It was really traumatizing for her, as a mom more than anything," says Axelrod. "Everybody wants the best for their kids and to be able to tell their kids that everything is OK. She had that moment of not knowing what to tell him and not knowing how to protect him."
Last year, the Biden administration directed ICE to focus on deporting truly dangerous undocumented immigrants—those entangled in terrorism or serious crimes, for instance—rather than the vast majority who lead peaceful and productive lives in the United States. But in June, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Judge Drew Tipton blocked that policy.
Axelrod believes that Carmen and Brandon's near-deportation wouldn't have happened if the Biden administration's enforcement priorities were still in place. "My theory is that during this period of injunction while there is no official guidance from on high, local ICE offices basically have the freedom to do what they want with their docket," she says. If the goal is "to deport as many people as possible…the easiest people to deport are people like Carmen, people who are going to show up to the ICE office when you tell them to and who have already given you all their travel documents, who you already know that they're nonviolent and compliant."
"This is sort of the low-hanging fruit in terms of effort expended to number of people deported," Axelrod continues.
The reversed enforcement guidance represents a significant blow to countless undocumented immigrants who have no criminal records, face violence if forced to return to their home countries, and have built their lives in the United States. Immigrants are already being deported without notice. Oklahoma immigration attorney Lorena Rivas told the Los Angeles Times that had happened to one of her clients, and she had heard of similar cases from other attorneys. One woman was deported to Mexico after a routine check-in in Memphis along with three of her children, who are U.S. citizens.
"ICE is designed to do exactly this," says Axelrod. "That's what our immigration laws allow." Though Carmen and Brandon ultimately weren't deported, other nonviolent, vulnerable migrants might not be so lucky.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So glad to hear the story had a happy ending.
I've had multiple peaceful migrants walk through my house and I always welcome them with open arms. No locks on my house!
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (anu-02) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://cashprofit99.netlify.app/
that's a facetious argument. Just because a person advocates for housing the homeless it does not mean they are in favor of bringing homeless people into their home, it means they want affordable housing or some arrangement to be made for the less fortunate. Wanting a government policy that makes immigration easier for immigrants who would otherwise come illegally is not the equivalent of letting strangers into your home. How about you come up with a real argument against legalizing immigrants instead of your "example".
No it's not. Every immigrant has some cost that taxpayers are forced to cover. I distinctly remey each Democrat candidate raise their hand and say they wanted to pay for the medical bills of all of immigrants. I don't want to. Many don't. And not for "racist" or other reasons, but because we already pay for ourselves and our current fellow citizens. If you want them here then YOU should pay the costs.
Okay, so I am going to extend your argument to its logical conclusion.
Since not only (most) every immigrant costs taxpayers money, but (most) every new native-born citizen costs taxpayers money, it is right and proper to try to restrict the "entry" of these individuals into the country. For immigrants, we do it by building walls and passing laws making it illegal to do business with illegal immigrants in various ways; only those immigrants who have explicit government permission to be here ought to be entitled to the privilege of participating fully in American life. For native-born citizens, then, we ought to make it illegal for a woman to give birth to a new citizen without government permission. Only those couples who get government permission to get pregnant and have a child should be legally entitled to create a new citizen.
Is this argument wrong? Clearly explain why it is wrong, and if it's wrong for native-born citizens, why it isn't also wrong for immigrants.
Your premise is that native born people and immigrants are the same. Your premise is flawed. Furthermore you've made this stupid argument before. You need new material.
This is the most stupid argument on here. Name a country that doesn't have immigration laws. You seem to think immigration is just a free act. You do really a society has to take care of them and provide right? Immigrants also need to want to be a part of the culture they go to or it doesn't work.
Since you love immigrants - why aren't there options for Korean, or Germany, or Dutch, or Japanese on health services. Why don't you care about them? Is it because you are racist?
Every county has native/natural born citizens with certain rights. It's not the government, it's society who decides on how many and who.
I'm sure Chem here is like all the Reason folks. They talk a good game but when some show up in Washington DC, Chicago, NY - you know places that say we are a sanctuary city until it actually cost them. They, and Jeff here have no clue what it is like on the border or actually what it is like for legal immigrants in general.
Are you like a peckerwood, bro?
We actually do have laws legalizing immigrants. My ex Russian girlfriend (non mail order) came over and did that.
Your argument is the facetious because these are illegal immigrants. It's the same as someone breaking into your home and squatting there. Sure they may kick in a dollar from time to time.
Again, people like you and Reason try to frame it that people don't like immigrants. People don't like illegal immigrants that break the law. You don't like the law work to change it.
Hey is this like stormfront raiding the comments or something? Who the fuck cares about the Russian girlfriend you had to pay for?
Hi Fiona are you going to house them?
Appeal to emotion. Standard.
In the "Without Government To Pay for the Healthcare, the poor would die!" news:
Note that St Jude Cancer Hospital has around a $1.4 Billion annual budget, almost entirely funded by private donations (they do get grants from the government for their medical research). 75% of their budget comes from an affiliated fundraising arm (ALSAC), but they get generous support from multiple evil fraternities and sororities.
Overt, yesterday (I think) you asked me for a link to a video I had made reference to about a former TV journalist (emmy award winning, blah blah blah) who gave an hour long talk giving exacting and forensic breakdowns of Journalistic failures and "malpractice" in the era of Trump.
I found that video and linked it, but the thread was dead. So here it is again.
56 minutes with Q&A at the end.
Thanks, captain. Stored in my records.
Illegal sub-humans must be PUNISHED!!! Cast OUT into the barren desert, to starve and then be eaten by carnivorous beasts, so as to PAY for the sins of the Purest Native Ones! SCAPE ye goats, ye!
Can they declare themselves to be DOGS, and get discounted veterinary care? Because if they CAN, I, too, would LOVE to self-identify as a canine, and NOT pay out the ass, for my medical / veterinary care! WHERE do I declare myself to be a DAWG, dammit!!!
Illegal immigrants are not sub-human, they are humans as much as you, me, and any other american. And even if these illegal immigrants-which I bet you've never met one and talked with- were your enemy did jesus not teach to love your neighbor as well as your enemy? But then again, you're the persecutor aren't you?
Matthew 5:43-48
Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
They are not our enemy. My children played with them when we lived in another state. They were our neighbors. We did not report them, ask them their status, or think of them as bad. We helped them and they helped us.
Some recently roofed my house. ( I assume a lot here but the guy who missed a step and fell through our ceiling onto our dining room table did not speak any english- fortunately he was Ok)
But the uncontrolled invasion should stop on the basis that we should not be forced to bear the costs.
Stuff your religion up your ass: A1.
All illegal immigrants should be deported.
Seems like idiots at this website support Biden's policy of inviting and allowing tens of millions of the world's poorest people to unlawfully invade our great nation,
Give the illegal sub-humanoids their "magic Papers Please"... And then Lo and Behold! Ipso Presto, Hocus Pocus, they will become productive citizens!!! By the MAGIC powers of The Sacred Laws!!!
Here's a good read for those who still have an open mind... Cato…
https://www.cato.org/policy-report/januaryfebruary-2019/myths-facts-immigration-policy
https://www.cato.org/blog/crime-along-mexican-border-lower-rest-country
I agree. I think that if you're going to have a law, then it needs to be consistently enforced. It's been clear to me for several years that the lack of immigration enforcement on low-wage workers is just a way for the donors to the two parties to skirt labor laws.
Both parties want the system to continue because there is still a demand for people willing to work hard for very low wages and with no complaints. The labor reforms of the Progressive Era haven't changed that.
All of the above occurred in Trump's America.
Indeed. It makes you wonder how they breached that wall though.
Law is no match for tears.
Reason Contributor, Brendan O'Neill:
So they failed their hearing twice and because they have a sob story we should condemn the law being upheld? Asylum laws might be a mess but the reason for her asylum application seems fairly weak. It doesn't seem like a valid case for asylum. There are visas available to receive medical care, why didn't she apply for one of them? St. Jude's even has social workers who would have helped her complete the process. Instead she got a green card and claimed asylum, and then lost two hearings because her case was weak. Sorry, I just can't get worked up over this. Instead of blatantly playing to emotionalism how about a factual, in depth article on how asylum laws are messed up. Basing your case on heartstring pulling generally demonstrates a weakness in your argument.
I was watching a cooking competition show and one of the contestants gave their sob story. 2 of the judges ate it up. The third said are we running a charity or trying to decide who the best chef is?
If it's the one my wife watches, they were running a charity.
I seem to have missed the part where it explains why having survived cancer is relevant to the story.
Because, reasons. It's all about emotions devoid of actual facts or logic.
So, not only did they get free medical care in the US, they also get rewarded by being allowed to stay in the country after entering illegally. And for some reason you think that's a good thing.
Everybody who is in the country illegally should be deported, whether violent or not, "vulnerable" (=dirt poor) or not.
They should've been bull-whipped all the way back to Honduras.
so much for compassion for your fellow man...
Brandon? As in Let's Go Brandon?
Wait, there was a mass shooting in Memphis? How'd I miss that?
I was watching a cooking competition show and one of the contestants gave their sob story. 2 of the judges ate it up. The third said are we running a charity or trying to decide who the best chef is?
Happy to read this. There should be a law where migrants can work anywhere without any problems.
Regards,
Faze Three
Doramamp4 offers you the best Asian dramas in high quality with subtitles in Spanish. We provide links to download each show as well as watch them online. You can also download them and watch them offline, on TV or mobile devices!
https://doramamp4.org/
BubbleShooter games have become hugely popular online games over the past few years. Players can play this type of game on their phones or on their computer. These games are also extremely challenging. Many offline versions of bubble shooters exist, but there are also a number of free online versions available.
https://bubbleshooter.bz/
Tomorrow Reason will have a story about a Mother and cancer patient living South of the Border and write, '....ICE almost prevented a 10 year old cancer survivor and his mom from entering the County illegally. While Carmen and Brandon ultimately entered the Country illegally, other vulnerable illegals might not be so lucky........'.
ICE Almost Deported a 10-Year-Old Cancer Survivor and His Mom
Next time, try harder.
I’m going to ask what is the problem?
These people are illegal aliens.
They’ve committed a crime and should be deported.
I’m sorry the child has a history of cancer, but at the moment he’s in remission and can safely return to his country of origin
Read teh fucking story. No crimes committed, not illegal aliens. You fucktards can't even remember when you use to claim you were only against illegal aliens. Now you are against anyone who's not White. Fuck you.
You RTFS, TDS-addled pile of shit; Biden's policies are at issue here.
But as a TDS-addled asshole, and a reflexive supporter of the left, you revert to your default position of lying and blaming Trump.
Fuck off and die, you slimy excuse for a human being.
10 year old leukemia survivor blocked from deportattion, Trump supporters hardest hit.
Aww show us on the doll where Trump touched you. Oh mister Biden supporter who is that working out? He and is cabal doing an awesome job. Own it. You should be proud.
I can't stand the man Trump, but his policies no matter what Reason said were good for the country. People like you like to project their inner feelings on the other side.
Go hug your AOC doll. She might not make it alive to the end of September (her words)
Yellow-press headline caused by Biden featured; TDS-addled steaming piles of lefty shit hardest hit!!
"...Axelrod believes that Carmen and Brandon's near-deportation wouldn't have happened if the Biden administration's enforcement priorities were still in place..."
Stuff your TDS up your ass Brandyshit; the absolute worst sort of partisan asshole we can imagine.
It's always amusing people have to go to extreme cases to try make their point. You don't like abortion? What about the 12 year that was raped and having triplets.
Fiona, we have what 1 to 2 million illegal immigrants. Of course, there will be mistakes. You are talking 1 case out of how many? Again, why should law breakers get a pass? You don't like the law work to change. If the speed limit is 50, and I am going a 100 - do I get a pass because I wanted to go somewhere? What about if I just want something from a store and take it?
You can't pick and chose what laws to enforce. Well you shouldn't. Reason is supposed to be for "what the people want" not government yet you don't care what citizens want only illegal immigrants.
Again, how many illegal immigrants are you supporting and living with?
"ICE Almost Deported a 10-Year-Old Cancer Survivor and His Mom"
Wasn't this featured in red on the front page of the Star at the local check-out counters last week?
FIONA HARRIGAN can stuff her 'victimhood' headlines up her ass; her head is probably already there.
Wanna be taken as other than a yellow press shit? Write other than yellow press shit.
She has a final deportation order. What's the rationale for letting her stay? Why do we catch and release asylum seekers if we're just going to ignore the system when they go through it and fail to substantiate their claim?
She is not only a failed asylum seeker, she hasn't bothered in six years to learn enough English to read the paperwork put in front of her to sign.