Despite the Media Hype, Unionization Is Down—and for Good Reason
Unionization helps some. But it hurts more.

Monday is Labor Day. Will you celebrate unions?
The media does. "Unions are cool again," reports CBS News. They suggest unionization is booming.
"Reporters" practically cheered when a Starbucks in Buffalo, New York, became the first Starbucks to unionize. "A big symbolic win for labor," The New York Times called it.
Since then, more than 180 Starbucks voted to unionize, and 300 filed for union elections.
Starbucks already offers better benefits than many companies: health benefits, even for part-time workers, free college tuition, maternity leave, and more. Their minimum wage is $17/hour. But activists want more.
Apple Store employees and Google workers are also starting unionization efforts. In the first half of 2022, union election petitions increased by 57 percent.
They have political support. President Joe Biden promised he'd be "the most pro-union president you've ever seen," and he probably has been. He supports the PRO Act, which would override state right-to-work laws and fine employers that fire workers for trying to unionize.
The Washington Post claims there is a "wave of labor activism sweeping the country."
But despite all political support and media hype, unionization is down.
Unionization did increase during the pandemic but fell as the pandemic waned. In 2021, 15.8 million workers were represented by a union, a decline of half a million since 2019.
There are many reasons.
The Janus Supreme Court decision in 2018 declared it unconstitutional to force government workers to pay union dues. Now 28 states no longer force any workers to pay union dues. That's a good thing. No one should be forced to join groups they don't want to join.
In 1973, when I first went to work for CBS, I was forced to join AFTRA, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. I didn't want to. I didn't want to pay dues to a union that didn't appear to do much, but I had no choice.
At work, I saw how union rules routinely slowed work down—sometimes in ridiculous ways. I couldn't just press a button and watch a video. I had to find a union editor and ask him to press the button.
One reason Fox News grew faster than CBS, NBC, and ABC's news operations is that non-union Fox is more flexible. They are able to try new things. They didn't have to obey all the stupid rules.
This is another reason why the number of union workers has declined. Union rules limit their employers' ability to change, adapt, and grow.
Non-union Toyota and Honda outgrew unionized companies like General Motors (GM). They hired more people, created more jobs. That was good for labor, just not unionized labor.
Unionization helps some. But it hurts more.
Some GM workers got higher pay and more time off. But lots of potential workers never got a chance. Toyota and Honda helped more people simply by growing faster.
Today activists claim unions built the middle class. Without unions, they say, there would be no weekend and no eight-hour day.
But that's not true.
Workers' lives improved in America mostly because of competition, not union rules. Competition is what does the most for workers.
In 1914, Henry Ford doubled his employees' wages to $5 a day and cut their workday to eight hours. People claim he was forced to do it by union pressure. That's a myth. He did it because his company had high turnover. Raising wages helped him keep good workers.
Free market competition forces everyone to do better. What workers need is not a union's rigid rules, but competition.
Today there's lots of competition for workers. It's driven companies like Costco to offer a $17-an-hour starting wage.
Unions help some, but a free market helps more.
COPYRIGHT 2022 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Unions (mostly) support the Democratic Party.
Media (mostly) supports the Democratic Party.
Academia (mostly) supports the Democratic Party.
Progressives (mostly) support the Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party supports most unions, media, academia, and progressives.
People as individuals or outside of these groups are inconsequential.
If you're talking consequential... skin color above all.
Skin color is the most important thing
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (ati-06) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
Non-public sector unions have largely left the Democrat Party. Because Democrats are now into Identity and Canceling and Hollywood and don't give a shit about the working man. In short Democrats are no longer liberal, they're progressive. The union working man is switching over to the Republicans. Hence the reason the GOP is all gung ho for protectionism.
But no matter, the unions are are dying, the only one left with any political power are the public sector unions.
Whatever will we do if a Starbucks goes on strike?
You'll just have to panhandle and do your drugs somewhere else for a while.
Homeless people will have to go back to the overpass.
I have an old -timey percolating drip coffee pot and bottled flavoring in the fridge...so oh well!
Doesn’t matter if you sample their wares or not, you’re still paying for their gender studies degrees.
But nowhere near as much as the people that do partake.
Great Value Non-Dairy Hazelnut and chilled Carnation French Vanilla are simply the best, with no added social science lectures or sight of nose-rings to put you off your Java!
And to top it off, I do my own cooking, so while they're Woke, I'm Well-Breakfasted! 🙂
Hate Starbucks. I'll take any other brand first. Even that awful stuff Tim Horton's sells is better.
I support Woke Corporations unionizing. I will even donate to the effort.
Free market competition forces everyone to do better. What workers need is not a union's rigid rules, but competition.
When the labor was Chinese and trade rules forced all companies to compete with the Chinese (whether they knew it or not), the result WAS that the rungs at the bottom of the ladder were cut off as jobs were outsourced. Those folks did not learn to code or attract VC money for startups. They took crappy jobs at crappy wages for crappy companies with crappy bosses in crappy towns with no exit. And for the relatively unskilled, they took that for close to 30 years until covid really.
When a shit ton of employees realized how crappy their employers really were and how important their families were too them. For those old enough to have home equity - they left the workforce in droves and will never return. For those too young for that, they are now in a better labor market. But I suspect it ain't competition as judged by crappy bosses that will raise their boats. It will be collective bargaining.
If that ultimately leads to 'rigid rules' - well probably. But that pendulum has to swing a long long way to get there - through a lot of better economic power positions.
If private company workers unionize, drive labor cost up and productivity down, then rival non-unionized companies benefit and the customers don't suffer - Toyota vs GM.
When government workers unionize, there is no competing organization that benefits. The decrease in productivity and the increase in costs is passed directly on to customers who cannot take their business anywhere else.
And who is negotiating with public sector unions? At the bargaining table all participants are on the same side.
It's always a great year for public sector unions.
If a union is voluntary, in that it does not have government on its side giving it extra privileges, then I got no problem with it. If workers want to organize and go on strike, they should be free to do so. At the same time, national and state (even even local) governments should not be forcing unionization.
My grandpa worshiped the ground Jimmy Hoffa walked on. But my dad did not follow in his love of unions, and hated them with a passion. Because me dad was forced to pay union dues and see those dues go to political candidates and causes he did not agree with.
My personal experience with unions was one summer when i was a temp in a union printing shop. I had heard the stories, but didn't think them real until them. Some guys were okay guys, but the ones who drank the union koolaid were straight out of central casting. Once this lady driving a forklift managed to run into and spill a fifty gallon drum of printers ink. She just drove away saying "it' not my job to cleanup spills". That's the essence of union mentality right there. Wouldn't bother wiping their asses if it wasn't in their contracts.
Unions are pretty much dead. The only unions with any clout any more are public sector unions. Prison guards and teaches. Plus that one service union. And weird shit like Hollywood writers. Okay, and nurses. But actual labor unions running a city? Nope, dead as a dodo. No one wants them. No one sees the need for them.
Even in my extremely progressive Democrat state of California, unions are disappearing. Lots of government contracts specify prevailing wages, but outside of San Francisco, it's independent non-union contractors that tend to fill them.
I'm thankful that in the US we moved Labor Day away from May 1st to make it explicit that Labor Day was NOT a celebration of Karl Marx or any sort of International Socialist Convention. Quite frankly, we should rename it to "End of Summer Day" or something. (Yeah, I know, not technically end of summer, but don't you dare wear white any time after).
Unions: Protecting the bad workers and discouraging the good workers since, well, the inception of unions.
A union is essentially a criminal syndicate that exists to extort money from any company unfortunate to stand in their way. Unionized workers are thugs and goons and should be treated as such.