Redistricting in New York Will Cost a Longtime Democrat a House Seat
Despite an overwhelming sense that the country is headed in the wrong direction, the only way most voters will fire an incumbent is by voting for a different incumbent instead.

Historically, incumbent politicians rarely seem to lose their bids for reelection. In New York's primary elections today for the House of Representatives, one incumbent is likely to defy the odds by losing their seat. But unfortunately, the reason is not that voters wanted a change.
New York was scheduled to hold its primary elections on June 28. Then in April, the state's court of appeals struck down its new district maps, determining that "the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent." As a compromise, primaries for state-level races remained on the same date, while races for Congress and the state Legislature were postponed until today.
Under the state's new maps, district lines have shifted such that incumbent candidates are running against one another.
Rep. Jerry Nadler and Rep. Carolyn Maloney are both Democrats representing parts of New York City. Nadler currently represents the state's 10th congressional district, which includes Manhattan's Upper West Side; Maloney represents the 12th, which includes the city's tony Upper East Side. Under the new court-imposed map, both areas are part of the 12th district, and both Nadler and Maloney are running in that primary to keep the seat.
The same thing happened in Georgia when Rep. Lucy McBath ousted fellow Democratic Rep. Carolyn Bourdeaux after that state's 6th district was redrawn to be more favorable to Republicans. Rather than running for reelection in the newly competitive 6th, McBath ran against Bourdeaux, who represented the nearby 7th, which was still favorable to Democrats.
But the race in New York is slightly different. While McBath and Bourdeaux were upstarts who had recently flipped seats, Nadler and Maloney have been in office for decades, each first elected in 1992. Nadler, head of the House Judiciary Committee, had a visible presence during former President Donald Trump's impeachment trials. Maloney, meanwhile, touts a long history of firsts as the first woman elected to her city council district and the first woman to lead the House Oversight Committee. No matter what happens today, at least one long-serving member of Congress will be voted out of office.
One of the persistent themes of American elections is the power of incumbency. In any given election cycle, the overwhelming majority of officeholders seeking reelection will win their races. Even in "wave" elections that see one party achieve massive success and recapture control of Congress, the rate of incumbents winning reelection is still staggeringly high. House incumbents have not won reelection by a rate of less than 85 percent in at least six decades. Despite the fact that political turnover leads to greater economic growth and less corruption, and even as voters overwhelmingly say that the country is on the wrong track, a solid majority of the country will still pull the lever for the existing candidate when given the choice.
It seems that the only way most voters will fire an incumbent is by voting for a different one instead.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Both sides! Republicans only by the narrowest of margins turned Liz Cheney out of office. At least until 2024 when she's the odds-on favorite to become President.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (anu--25) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://smartpay21.pages.dev
When Missouri re-drew its maps this year, my residence switched districts, too.
I went from a district that recently ousted long-time (D) Rep. W. Lacey Clay for newcomer (D) Rep. Cori Bush - often considered one of the biggest idiots in Congress - to one that is represented by (R) Rep. Ann Wagner.
So, it can turn out well for some people.
I live in Kinzenger's district who got drawn out so the Democrats can get another seat. Kind of hilarious since he turned out to be a Democrat hero. I'm just disappointed I couldn't vote against him in the primary.
"Then in April, the state's court of appeals struck down its new district maps, determining that "the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent."
So sorry that this is a happening to you, Joe.
"Under the new court-imposed map . . . "
From an ancient manuscript;
"The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;"
Some courts are violating the US Constitution - - - - - - - - - -
How so? The time, place and manner of the election hasn't changed.
The place and manner goddamn well have when the courts change which district you live in.
"The Place" refers to polling place, not district. "The Manner" refers to voting method, not who you're voting for.
Just out Nadler and Maloney in a room with two pointed sticks. Whichever one emerges advances to the general election. If neither makes it out, the Republican wins the seat be default.
I am happy to provide the sticks, extra pointy.
At both ends!
If only they could all lose.
Nadler having to defend his seat? That's pretty shitty.
Won't someone think of the thirty-year members of Congress?!
The Candidates and their 'Seconds' and pistols at ten paces would have been so much better. Probably fairer way to handle this too.
How about this: people who get elected to office serve a maximum of two terms, and then get stood against the wall and shot.
Sucks to suck.
"Historically, incumbent politicians rarely seem to lose their bids for reelection. In New York's primary elections today for the House of Representatives, one incumbent is likely to defy the odds by losing their seat. But unfortunately, the reason is not that voters wanted a change."
You could argue that the reason actually IS that voters wanted a change. They forced that change by enough of them moving to Florida and Texas that the state lost a seat!