Government Goons Murder Internet-Famous Walrus
The Norwegian government euthanized Freya the walrus on Sunday, citing safety concerns for the crowds that gathered to watch her sunbathe.

Since mid-July, the internet has grown to love Freya the 1,300-pound walrus, who went viral after clips surfaced of her sunbathing on small boats, sinking them in the process.
However, on Sunday, the Norwegian government announced that it had killed her. The Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries argued that Freya needed to be euthanized due to the risks she posed to the crowds that gathered to watch and take photos of her. The agency also cited vague animal welfare concerns. "The walrus is not getting enough rest and the professionals we are in dialogue with believe she is stressed," Nadia Jdaini, a senior communications adviser for the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries, said in a statement to NBC News.
However, that assertion was later contradicted by Rune Aae, a biologist who had been following Freya's movements throughout Northern Europe. According to NBC news, Aae told them that "Freya had not shown signs of stress…but instead seemed curious about people. He criticized authorities for not blocking off the areas where the walrus spent the most time, or trying to move her, despite fears that she could drown if an attempt to tranquilize her failed."
According to The New York Times, Freya had been sighted along the coasts of Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Denmark in previous years. Before she was euthanized, Norwegian crowds had started to flock to see Freya, sometimes getting extremely close to the 1,300-pound walrus. Government officials also claim to have informed police of incidents where people attempted to swim up to the walrus.
However, despite their concerns, officials had originally claimed that euthanasia was "out of the question." That message abruptly changed, with government officials deciding to quickly kill Freya on Sunday. Following public outcry, officials at the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries defended their decision.
"I am firm that this was the right call. We have great regard for animal welfare, but human life and safety must take precedence," Frank Bakke-Jensen, the director general of fisheries in Norway, said on Sunday. Others disagree. "I'm surprised by the speed of the decision" to kill her, Fredrik Myhre, a marine biologist for the World Wide Fund for Nature in Norway told The New York Times. "They should have been more patient."
This case is just the latest instance of Norwegian government authorities deciding to kill big, inconvenient animals. The government has faced backlash in recent years for mass killings of critically endangered wolves, supposedly because they threaten livestock even though fewer than 100 wolves are thought to live in the country.
Further, as noted by NBC News, some have pointed out the hastiness of the government's decision to kill Freya. Yes, the walrus was found at a populated beach outside Oslo. However, in Norway, children were set to return to school the day after the government killed her. Further, cold weather and torrential rain were predicted to hit the country shortly. Both factors would have massively thinned the crowds of admirers raised as justification for her euthanasia.
Government bureaucrats, it seems, tend to ruin anything they touch, including internet-famous walruses. Freya captured hearts and delighted onlookers—all without injuring anyone. Granted, she did cause property damage, though Norwegian officials did not cite that as a justification for killing her. It seems that the main reason for Freya's death was that people liked her too much.
"She hasn't done anything to anyone," Oslo resident Trine Tandberg told The New York Times. "That's what's making so many of us really, really angry about this whole thing."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Without government, who would murder walruses?
Government is the animals we kill together!
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best (alp--538) assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://shortest.link/3Rbg
We had to kill the walrus to save the walrus.
He was stressed, so we took care of that problem!
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, (res-07) I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
.
After reading this article:>>>>> https://workhere3.blogspot.com/
Mark David Chapman?
I'm sure Jodie Foster wouldn't appreciate 1,300 pounds of walrus blubber on her doorstep as a token of love. 🙂
I thought the Walrus was Paul.
I am the walrus.
Joe Friday is the fool on the hill.
I am he as you are he and you are me and we are all together...
Whatever the case, it's the Norwegian government that has egg on its face in this story. And since they did it to themselves, I suppose that also makes them the eggman.
Koo-koo ka choo!
The walrus is not getting enough rest and the professionals we are in dialogue with believe she is stressed,"
This applies to most of us. Be careful out there!
If that's the standard treatment for stress, I'm really glad I don't live in Norway.
Norway's history is grounded in war against the sea.
"We have always been at war with Oceania."
Not too local.
Speaking of too local, my favorite libertarian publication continues to hammer the implications of the Rushdie stabbing.
And.
British writers who have a better grasp of an obscure US statute than the local gang.
And lastly:
I am the Walrus.
Shut the fuck up, Donny! V.I. Lenin. Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov!
A walrus gets a story before Ashley Babbit.
This is reason.
If the walrus had attempted to invade the Capitol at the head of a mob, then yeah..
Yes shrike. Trespassing on public property is a capital offense. No trial even needed.
Fuck off, peasant. Babbitt wasn't merely trespassing.
So minor vandalism is now a capital offense shrike? Changes the Narrative around BLM quite a bit then.
How many boats did Babbitt sink?
Fuck off, peasant.
I love how you think this is an endearing retort likely to win people over to your point of view.
Nothing shrike posts is endearing. Is overcompensating almost as much as much as Kirkland. One of life's failures who over estimates his importance.
This is an internet forum. No-one is important.
There is no fucking way you will be won over to my point of view. Plus you're one of the goons who still thinks I'm shrike, so it's not worth my time even to consider attempting to change what you laughably call your mind. Back to the mud farm, peasant.
There is video clearly showing that that is not what happened at all.
There is video clearly showing Babbitt breaking through a window at the head of a mob.
Not so. Babbitt didn't break the window herself. Quit being so dishonest.
Um....what exactly is the libertarian angle here?
Because as near as I can tell, in Libertopia, the first time this walrus was found "sunbathing on small boats, sinking them in the process," she'd likely have been shot by the owner of those boats.
So really, other than spending an entire post regurgitating news stories around the country, what is the Reason problem statement? What is the Reason remedy? That the government was wrong to kill a walrus because an ENVIRONMENTALIST GROUP thinks it was no threat? That we should heed the wishes of a mob of people who love watching a walrus destroy property, but will bare none of the responsibility for damages or deaths that it might cause?
Because as near as I can tell, in Libertopia, the first time this walrus was found "sunbathing on small boats, sinking them in the process," she'd likely have been shot by the owner of those boats.
Dogmatic libertarians, assuredly.
If it's dogmatic to fend off invaders, then by all means, that's a good thing.
Just tell Reason writers that it was stabbed to death by an Islamist and then they'll go quiet on it.
I hear 'The Big Guy' may refer to a walrus.
It's the writer's inner dog-mom. Sometimes women can't help themselves.
There is actually an interesting philosophical discussion to be had about managing wildlife in Libertopia, and it isn't "Hur dur, government is stupid!"
(Mind you, I think the government *is* stupid, and generally the last option you should take in solving lots of problems.)
At the end of the day, if you are going to have wildlife (as opposed to private ranches of semi-feral beasts) they are going to have to be managed in some way similar to how air, water and other transitory/migratory resources.
Am I justified in killing a deer that goes over my property? Am I justified in building fences that trap deer in my property?
I have spent a lot of time working with the Colorado Dept of Wildlife and Game. And I think they have a pretty good system in place that could transfer to a non-governmental system with relatively few tweaks. Because the department views wildlife as a resource to be managed equally between stakeholders. And those stakeholders are generally forced to support the management of the resource with their own fees and quotas.
Am I justified in building fences that trap deer in my property?
Build a wall... I like where this is going.
lol mad.casual hardest hit. missed opportunity to kill something rare
Rare my ass. With more free time and disposable income, paying thousands of dollars to drive, fly, and boat several days to haul more than two tons of walrus out of arctic waters might be cool. Until then those walrus are safe.
Where I come from a wild animal coming onto your property and destroying it is called a nuisance. Either we get to shoot the animals or you get to cover the insurance for the damage of the animals you won't let me shoot. Your choice.
lol I love you man. Kill everything in sight I just will never join you. I mean I'll walk around a cornfield and scare up some pheasant for you because that part's fun, but I won't shoot them because that part's not.
That’s right, food comes from a grocery store.
I was gonna say that I don't think he's that naive, but he did agree to flush birds personally.
Scaring up the pheasant yourself puts you down range. Stay home.
That said, I went to the fortune teller and she said that in 13-14 yrs. I would suffer a terrible, heartbreaking tragedy. To cheer myself up, I bought a puppy.
OK that's funny
And when that wildlife is destroying private property? If it was all sunbathing walrus on the rocks like pictured there is one question while walrus destroying boats is another.
"she'd likely have been shot by the owner of those boats. "
I'm not sure shooting them would be enough. They have thick skins and a thick layer of blubber beneath their thick skins. They need this sort of insulation to survive the harsh northern climate.
I think it was Willem Barentsz, the Dutch 16th century arctic explorer and discoverer of Svalbard, who introduced polar bears to Europe. He quickly learned to keep his distance from them as they were immune from firearms. While stranded on Novaya Zemlya over the winter, polar bears took up residence in the icebound ships which held their supplies and means of return to civilization.
All you need is an AR-15, it will blow their lungs out. /SleepyJoe
If that doesn't work, then all you can do is run. But an adult polar bear can easily outrun an adult human. The thing to do is to remove an item of clothing while you run and drop it. The curious bear will invariably stop to inspect the clothing, giving the runner a bit of a chance, provided safety is not that far off and is wearing enough clothing to drop.
Underwear with the shit all over it from being attacked is the best.
C'mon, Man! Buy A Shotgun! 🙂
https://youtu.be/F-mztxHgYQo
Most handgun calibers, probably not. But Norwegians know what kind of rifle is needed for polar bear or walrus.
"but will bare none of the responsibility "
You probably mean 'bear' as in carry. There was a joke in Canada when the government introduced the 'toonie,' a two dollar coin: obverse, Queen Elizabeth, reverse, an unnamed polar bear. In other words, the Queen with a bare (sic) behind.
Yeah, I really don't see the issue with this at all. A wild, potentially dangerous animal was causing property damage, and Atlantic Walrus are not protected under CITES as endangered or even threatened. Seems like a legitimate use of government to dispatch the animal.
But hey, let's make an emotional appeal to environmentalists and animal rights activists... because there's no way that could backfire on those that purportedly value individual rights and private property.
But how does CITES fit into a dogmatic libertarian's political framework?
Build your own walrus preserve.
"Seems like a legitimate use of government to dispatch the animal."
If it were common pests like possums or raccoons, you'd have a point. Both rare and dangerous, but more importantly, common. Given the rarity of walrus infestations I think we should cut them some slack.
I mean wild and at least potentially dangerous.
Why don't you ride walrus off in your rickshaw, Watermelon?
The libertarian angle is that people were freely going to look at this walrus, so government stepped in and stopped that permanently, because they might endanger themselves, or something. Other governments had no problem with the walrus, but Norway's did, so they killed a walrus that had been an attraction in several countries on the North Sea.
But again, that has nothing to do with libertarianism, unless you think that libertarianism is just Anti-Government.
The animal WAS damaging property. And, I don't know if you realize this, but when mobs start affecting the behavior of wild animals, it does result in danger to those people (generally).
Until the 18th century, the English used to put sheep killing dogs on trial in secular and church courts. Found guilty, the dogs would be hung from gallows. There is at least one case of a female donkey being tried for bestiality. Character witnesses testifying to her sweet disposition ensured a not guilty verdict, but her human partner in crime was found guilty and executed.
And there's this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deodand
Your point? There are cases where forfeiture is justified. Do you object?
Some fat cat complained when his boat got swamped and sunk? If they were afraid leftists you know who were going to sue the town into oblivion by some idiot walking / swimming up to a Walrus and not living to talk about it, that's sad.
Headline: Norwegian Police Mistake Walrus for Family Dog.
The Walrus was found with top secret government nuclear documents. The Norwegians had no choice.
Murdered?
Good grief ... SMH
+1
lol exactly
Ian MacDonald's Revolution In The Head is very complimentary towards I Am The Walrus. He says it's the last time the Beatles all working together and contributing put so much effort and innovative studio techniques into a recording.
http://library.lol/main/F19E8D9F011AEB825FB13BF225FC4C51
Documentary 'Produced by George Martin' has the man himself and Paul and Ringo giving entertaining insights into the early days when he produced early Peter Sellers albums to almost turning down the Beatles ending with Sgt. Pepper. Martin went deaf because he sat in front of the console so he could hear the music from all sides.
My parent's had a copy of the comedy album put out with Sellers and Sophia Loren to promote The Millionairess. Some funny bits and songs like Bangers and Mash, about an English man sick of spaghetti and longing for a good (?) English breakfast. The Beatles were incredibly lucky to work with such an open minded and gifted producer.
The Beatles were incredibly lucky to work with such an open minded and gifted producer.
^
He really isn't given nearly enough credit for having pioneered their sound and taught them how to write songs.
Freya was a medically assisted suicide.
4,400 lb. clump of cells.
Murder is when a person kills another person on purpose without a good reason. You can't murder a walrus.
If kids can identify as cats who the hell are you to say a walrus can't identify as a person. Should be ashamed.
"The walrus is not getting enough rest and the professionals we are in dialogue with believe she is stressed," Nadia Jdaini, a senior communications adviser for the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries, said in a statement to NBC News.
Meh. We have been doing that with college students, and hope to bring stress-justified mercy killings (or at least gender elimination) to elementary schools.
The Norwegians buried the walrus...in their stomachs!
Is Jethro Q. Walrustitty running for office in Norway in protest of this "murder"?
Monty Python's Election Night Special. 🙂
https://youtu.be/666OKm08fRA
You'd have to go ask one I guess. Personally, I think some international cooperation is warranted for things like that, but national level endangered species legislation is often far too overreaching and rife with abuse.
My point was that there are no obvious legal obstacles to prevent euthanasia nor, in my opinion, are there any moral ones.
Damn, I really need to work on my comment reply skills.
I was in Yellowstone. They warned visitors to not feed the animals and mind their trash. This was to prevent the animals from seeing people as a source of food. So if a bear started to seek out campgrounds to get food, it would be put down.
Not sure about the walrus case, but a large animal hanging out among humans can create risk. The walrus case sounds like the animal could have been moved away from the human occupied dock and not put down, but moving a walrus has its own issues as well.
Last time we were in Yellowstone (2020), someone in the neighboring campsite left flour tortillas, wrapped in plastic, sitting on top of their bear box. Two elk wandered down the road into their campsite and found the tortillas while I was sitting at in the chair at our site. Mrs. Casual told the boys to get in the tent. I handed her the keys and told her to get herself and them in the truck. She asked what I was going to do. I said I was going to stand there and be intimidating/present enough that they don't want anything to do with our campsite. They were there for about 10 min. before the Rangers showed up. By that point they had finished the tortillas and I had them 'herded' to the back of the site where the Rangers could flush them into the woods.
A la the 'puppy' joke above, either someone's going to shoot those elk or the practice will continue until someone, the elk, or both get hurt (just like with the bison). Still have the photos and footage, 10 ft. away from the elk. Different circumstances and I'd have one or both heads mounted on the wall.
Citizen: WHY did you kill the walrus? What in world was your reason?
Gov't: We killed it because we wanted to. We doan need no steenkin reason.
". . . sunbathing on small boats, sinking them in the process . . ."
Oh, so it's okay if our domestic security forces help protect private property, like you house safe, but God forbid those "European Socialists" have their security forces also help to protect their private property.
Where is the Norwegian Kyle Rittenhouse when they could use one - Oh, I remember where the Norwegian Kyle Rittenhouse is now: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35813470
It would take a demented fuck like you to try to equate those two.
How dare Kyle Rittenhouse shoot those who were trying to end his life! Why are you in favor of government totalitarianism?