Glenn Youngkin Says NIMBY Regulations Are Making Virginia an Impossibly Expensive Place To Live
The governor blamed local restrictions on new development for the state's rapidly rising rents and home prices.

Today, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin took a surprising YIMBY-inflected ("yes in my backyard") swipe at restrictive development regulations that he says are making the state increasingly unwelcoming for renters and homebuyers.
"The cost to rent or buy a home is too expensive," said the governor in a wide-ranging speech before the Virginia Senate's Joint Money Committee today. "We must tackle root causes behind this supply and demand mismatch; unnecessary regulations, overburdensome and inefficient local governments, restrictive zoning policies, and an ideology of fighting tooth and nail against any new development."
The state of Virginia is short roughly 105,000 homes, according to a recent study from the housing advocacy group Up For Growth. Another report commissioned by the state government found that while the state's population had expanded by over 10 percent since 2008, housing supply had only expanded by 8.7 percent.
For fast-expanding regions like the northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., that's meant skyrocketing rents and home prices. The median home price in Arlington County, Virginia, is $836,806 according to the Zillow Home Value Index. That's up from $667,000 in 2017.
"The really big danger in northern Virginia is … this unwritten rule or expectation that if you don't have a college degree or you don't make $100,000 per earner in your household, you should just live somewhere else," says Luca Gattoni-Celli, founder of YIMBYs of Northern Virginia, a chapter of national housing advocacy group YIMBY Action. "And that would be a real shame."
Gattoni-Celli blames the northern Virginia region's pressing housing affordability problems on low-density zoning rules that often allow just one house per property.
Reform is in the air, however. Arlington County is currently in the process of developing a "Missing Middle" zoning reform that would allow as many as eight units of housing on formerly single-family zoned lots.
Nationwide, three states and even more municipalities have legalized "missing middle" two-, three-, and four-unit homes on all residential land in an effort to bring housing prices and rents down. These zoning fights have typically occurred in deep-blue areas between pro-growth liberals and progressive NIMBYs.
Youngkin's comments today are evidence that both the problem of housing affordability and the solution of deregulating housing construction are bipartisan issues.
"The last election reminded everyone outside of the places that voted for Gov. Youngkin that Virginia is still a very purple state," says Gattoni-Celli. "Having leaders of both political parties identifying the same solution to such a serious problem is really great."
But, he adds, "if [Youngkin] is serious about this, it will have to translate into legislative action."
A state bill that would have legalized duplexes on residential land statewide was proposed in 2019 but went nowhere in the Legislature.
The Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development has also been weighing a change to state building codes that would allow apartment buildings to be constructed with just one staircase. That seemingly small technical change could potentially goose apartment construction by enabling them to fit on smaller lots.
Time will tell if the governor's promising comments translate into more than just talk.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just give everyone a raise! -SleepyJoe
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best (alp--523) assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://shortest.link/3Rbg
yeahhh
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, (res-03) I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
.
After reading this article:>>>>> https://workhere3.blogspot.com/
I think the bigger culprit is too many high paying government jobs in DC.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best (alp--5e34) assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://googlechoice.netlify.app
How to fix housing affordability in your state:
1) Hire a team to translate Japanese development laws into English.
2) Have the state legislature enact the translated Japanese development laws.
There, you're done. The Japanese manage to have affordable housing under much worse natural conditions than the US (between scarcity of land and high seismic risk); your state can have it, too.
(While you're at it, be sure you adopt the Japanese rules on eminent domain, which in practice is "If the city really, really needs to build an airport, it might eventually be able to condemn enough land; otherwise the government needs the consent of the owner just like anyone else.")
How to fix government problems anywhere:
* Remove government distortion of markets.
* Hang everyone who fights this.
* Hang everyone who tries to bring it back.
I mean .... as long as we're going to fantasize, why not do it right?
Here we go again. Blame housing shortages and prices on zoning, especially the oppressive one house per property kind.
Let's start by trying to agree on what words mean. I suggest that a house, in this context, means a single, free-standing structure designed to provide living space for a single household, typically a family. And to be free-standing, it has to have some open land on all sides.
Now I suppose we could debate how much land, i.e. how much distance between structures is required for "houses". I will argue that most people imagine that houses have "yards", i.e. private areas that serve both practical (kid play, BBQs, room for stuff) and aesthetic purposes.
So, then, how many structures do you want to put into an area? As many as possible? OK, then knock down whatever is there and do the housing project thing, with 20 story apartment blocks and some concrete plaza space. Not houses. Or maybe more modest 5 story condos with a strip of shared grass and a token play/dog poop area. Not houses. Fine, use those wasteful yards to squeeze in granny flats and maybe even house-like structures, that end up all about 5 feet from each other, with no open space. Not houses, at least the kind that attract people and their dollars in many places.
If the purpose is to create living space for as many people per square mile as possible, just say so, change the zoning, and go full Soviet. If you think you can magically add a significant number of true houses in an established neighborhood, you might want to play with models first.
There are no families any more, that is an outdated concept.
From a liberty point of view, you fail utterly.
It's entirely up to the property owner. It's nobody else's business.
"The Soviets were right"
Not a good look
Everyone who says that should be hustled un-ceremonially to, say, Venezuela and turned loose to form the perfect Socialist state. Native Venezuelans could move to the budding Socialist's digs and jobs in the U.S. to see how they'd make out.
In case any of you circle back today, tell us what a true libertarian/market solution would be for a group of like-minded people who want to own single family houses in a neighborhood of single family houses--if not forever at least for their lifetimes. Single private owner of the neighborhood, and leases for individual properties? Private ownership of lots and shared ownership of roads and any common spaces--but with strict covenants on lot use? Other?
I still get concerned that certain YIMBY types are not deregulatory and instead push for regulations requiring higher density building.
I also wonder how remote work will shift this, as there are places with cheap housing in the US, but we're seeing a major move towards cities again after long suburbanization.
That's what all these YIMBY articles boil down to. I don't live in the city because I hate cities. I hate traffic. I hate apartments. I hate the garbage and crime that comes with dense housing. I hate the mindset of people who live in cities.
We bought our house in a quiet neighborhood with a nice view in a relatively small town. Every apartment complex and new housing development they decide to throw in ruins what made the area attractive. I commute into and work in the DC area from just outside the normal commuter area. The sprawl of the DC swamp has completely fucked up Loudon county (which used to be all beautiful farm land and small towns.) We're starting to get the same thing here. The cities all around DC are horrible areas to drive and work and I wouldn't be able to stand living there. Adding more congestion to the area just makes it even shittier. Rather than continuing to bloat the overpaid federal government workforce in the area why don't we at least spread that shit out.
Step one: Fire half the federal workers in DC.
Step two: there is no need for a step two.
thanks for ifo
Why only half?
To separate the optimists from the pessimists?
I'm all in on this idea, and would take it even one step further: localities should allow homeowners to rent out any part of their existing single-family home as a separate dwelling unit by default. It shouldn't require a zoning waiver to renovate one's garage and turn it into a studio apartment. You don't need a waiver to renovate to make room for more kids or to let your elderly parents live with you, so why do you need one for renting it?
And that's even if one can even get a waiver in the first place. In my locality, the city of Fairfax, you can't renovate a room in your house and rent it out unless you're over 60 years old.
This article, as is often the case with Reason columns, is totally unserious. Virginia is a huge state yet the focus was on NoVa. People in Virginia (Norfolk, Richmond, Charlottesville, Roanoke, South Hill, Harrisonburg, et al) have great disdain for NoVa because it is more a creature of DC and their high salaries paid by the Feds. Governor Youngkin was expressing alarm about housing in the other parts of VA where Virginians reside. NoVa is not a good benchmark for such a discussion. Unserious article
Nb: Government housing in Richmond is booming. The city is constructing public housing like they were drunk with Federal monies... because they are!
"Christian graduated from Portland State University with a degree in political science in 2016. He worked briefly in public relations before moving into journalism by way of an internship at Reason's D.C. office."
https://reason.com/people/christian-britschgi/
there ya go.
Christian, come visit the real Virginia, like anywhere 45 minutes dead south or southwest of Arlington. Get real.
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able to start working from home right away. (res-07) This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
After reading this article:>> https://incomebuzz7.blogspot.com/
reform of the system is impossible... all we can hope for now is a peaceful collapse of the system like the Soviet union collapse decades ago
Just because you make the space available for low income housing doesn't mean builders will jump at low cost, low return on value building. Why when you can double or triple earnings on an $800,00 dollar house. The only incentive would be to provide the same profit on lower housing builds through state incentives which will not happen of course.
If this clown wants an 8 to 1 ratio of 'units' start with the home he currently resides in - 1 of the 8 must house homeless people. Deport all the illegals and automate the bottom 30% of jobs to get down to 250 million population with a 35% reduction of government employees and you won't have a housing crisis anywhere.
I think one of the best solutions would be to tear up D.C., and since we can't do it flat out, I think we should just move the different departments around. Department of the Interior is now in Kansas (you know, the interior). HUD is now in public housing in South Chicago. Defense is now in Georgia. Energy is in New Mexico. Education is in Nome, Alaska. Agriculture is in Montana. Commerce is in New Jersey. Health and Human Services is in Alabama. Homeland Security is in an undisclosed location- if you can't find it, consider yourself fired. Justice is in Texas. Labor is in Detroit, Michigan. State is a roving agency that moves offices every year between the 50 states. Treasury is in Texas (Fort Knox). Transportation is in Idaho. Veterans Affairs is in Indiana.
Then, having broken them up, we can weaken their hold and slowly thin them out without it being a massive fight. Lots of bureaucrats would quit rather than have to move...
This would also help out Virginia, because all of a sudden there wouldn't be the push to have lots of DCites there. The state would be free from the stranglehold, and the non NoVa parts would have representation that mattered. DC could be the place for the Supreme Court, the legislature, and the President, but more and more things could just be done remotely, which would help decrease Federal creep.