Maxine Waters Says She May Not Vote for 'Shameful' Inflation Reduction Act, Citing Lack of Housing Spending
The new reconciliation bill also nixes a zoning reform program that had been included in the more expansive Build Back Better bill.

Housing advocates and their Democratic allies in Congress are hopping mad that the reconciliation bill that the White House and congressional leadership have worked out with Sen. Joe Manchin (D–W.Va.) doesn't include any more federal funds for housing.
"The recent information about what has been made available in this deal…is shameful, I'm embarrassed by it. I'm angered by it," said Rep. Maxine Waters (D–Calif.) during a press call today. "The way I'm feeling right now, I'm not committed to voting for [the bill]. I have a lot I have to say to leadership."
The call was organized by the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) to promote the release of its Out of Reach report, which compiles data on wages and rents across the U.S. to paint a bleak picture of housing affordability.
(The report is a helpful resource for comparing housing costs across the country. But its methodology also overstates the housing affordability issues many renters face, as I've argued before.)
The NLIHC has long advocated for additional federal spending and tenant protections as the cure for America's high housing costs. Their latest report re-ups those recommendations. It also endorses converting the $46 billion Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP), a temporary measure passed during the pandemic, into a permanent program.
Early in the Biden administration, hopes were high among supporters of this approach to housing affordability that they'd be able to get most of their agenda passed.
Waters, who chairs the House Committee on Financial Services (which handles housing policy), managed to include $150 billion in housing spending in the far more expansive reconciliation bill, the Build Back Better Act, that passed the House in November 2021.
None of that spending managed to make it into the new reconciliation bill, the Inflation Reduction Act. That bill does include close to $900 million to fund energy efficiency improvements at affordable housing complexes, which Waters said was deeply disappointing.
The new reconciliation bill also nixes one of the few possible silver linings in the Build Back Better proposal.
The version of Build Back Better that the House passed in November included a modest "Unlocking Possibilities" program that would have provided $1.6 billion in planning grants to local governments looking to reform their zoning code.
Free market wonks were split on how effective this would have been at encouraging localities to reduce their regulations on new housing supply. The exclusion of even that tepid measure from the Inflation Reduction Act is more evidence that zoning reform is less and less of a priority for this Congress.
The Senate is supposed to take up the Inflation Reduction Act next week.
Whether Waters can be convinced to vote for the bill, given her criticism of it today, remains to be seen. Her fellow progressives in the House were less perturbed by the absence of new housing funding.
"If it's all true, and if the language is really—reflects what is what the top lines are, it's a huge victory for the American people," said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D–Wash.), the leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, per NBC News.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hey sarc, why are no not convinced that GDP is a meaningful measurement? When did you come to this conclusion? Do you have a better idea?
GDP was relevant in 2020 when I could use it to prove Trump was directly responsible for ruining the economy. GDP is untrustworthy in 2022 if it might indicate a Democratic economy isn't quite as strong as I'd hyped it up to be.
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
Geez bud, if you're going to copy and paste the same damn rant over and over, at least fix it,
Sarc told people to ask him. Meh.
I don't mind the question, just the typo.
It’s sarc’s typo.
Just don't make sarc kick your ass in a debate like he did mine. It was brutal.
I bet!
Serves you right for being a tribalist mean girl.
I made $30,030 in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
Reading this article:>>>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
"It’s sarc’s typo"
Poor sarc.
GDI or get the f__k out
The NLIHC "has long advocated for additional federal spending and tenant protections as the cure for America's high housing costs" while willfully ignoring the evidence that those are in fact the cause of those higher housing costs. (Or at least, are significant contributing causes.)
But sure, let's double-down on failed policies. Surely they'll work this time!
if Maxine Waters' vote was necessary it would be cast in line.
That was my though too.
It would be great if that lunatic was the one to kneecap the bill.
So spending another 800 billion or so is 'fighting inflation' ? How about cut spending, period.
"Maxine Waters Says"...and no one gives a shit.
If there was any chance her vote mattered she would bend over and lick pelosi's cunt, and say thank you may I have another.
Similar to AOC and the squad bitching about aid for Israel. Weak little bitches
Too weak to make sandwiches?
Performance politics!
Waters would be bitching if the bill provided "only" $100,000 checks sent to every man, woman and child in America every year. There is never enough spending to please the greed and enviousness of some people.
She'd be bitching because "every man, woman and child" includes whites. And honorary whites like Jews and Asians. And browns.
And I care what a ranting lunatic thinks exactly why? Going to Zerohedge where once in a while somebody actually writes about something relevant.
Waters, who chairs the House Committee on Financial Services (which handles housing policy), managed to include $150 billion in housing spending in the far more expansive reconciliation bill, the Build Back Better Act, that passed the House in November 2021.
Call me crazy, but you'd think $150 billion on housing would go a long way, wouldn't it? I mean we're talking about ~~$2000 if you just mailed a check to every household in the US. But not every single household in the US needs to be bailed out on their housing expenses. Surely you just spent enough, less than 12 months ago, to actually make a lot of progress on this problem.
And if you didn't, how is throwing more loose change around solving anything?
It all went to rich people to raise the price of housing.
In San Francisco $600,000 went for homeless housing - for each apartment unit. When you have to pay for an army of bureaucrats and the 'highest prevailing union wage' seems it doesn't go as far as you might expect.
Of course, the actual housing was not the goal, only the excuse.
If it solved a problem it would destroy their argument for more spending.
Who says politicians, especially activist Democrats want to solve any issues?
Also, funding for housing, like funding for the homeless, goes primarily to the thousands of NGO professionals and their contractors.
Sometimes people are so dumb they accidentally make the right decision.
Stupid/socialist is as stupid/socialist does.
Is Maxine thinking of retiring? Is that why she's looking for a new house? I can't imagine any other reason she'd be pushing so hard for housing money.
When will have the congressional hearings about Waters's incitement of mob violence?
After the next congress is convened.
Maxine Waters has a face made for baseball batting.
My favorite Maxine Waters face:
https://notthebee.com/article/why-does-maxine-waters-look-like-shes-being-held-hostage-while-standing-behind-nancy-pelosi-at-a-press-conference
Looks to me like someone goosed her. Was Biden anywhere nearby?
As Rodney said "Last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it."
Housing is quintessentially a local issue. Even "mobile homes" are rarely moved once put in place and even when moved they rarely are moved very far away.
Why should the federal government have anything to do with such a local issue? Waters represents a liberal district in a liberal county and in a liberal state. She historically wins with between 70% and 80% of the vote in past elections in spite of her harebrained public outbursts.
Surely local people know more about the priorities about their local area than politicians and bureaucrats over 2000 miles away unless the locals are brain damaged (although, given that they vote for Waters, I can't dismiss that possibility).
Surely whatever she wants done in her district or California can be paid for by California taxpayers and the funds can be more effectively spent without federal strings attached or diminished by the "bureaucratic tax" imposed by the cost of administering grants from Washington DC (to say nothing of the fact that California may not even get "its fair share" back - esp. when in ~30 months it's likely DC will be controlled by Republicans).
Does she really think that Governor Newsom and the Democratic State Legislature are so clueless they need Washington DC to help tell them how to best spend their own money? If so, why hasn't she come out publicly to lambast Newsom and the state legislature for their incompetence -- and why didn't she vocally support Newsom's recall just recently?
People who serially vote for this deranged bint deserve to suffer.
They do! And their priority is to get people outside their district to pay for housing in their district!
Any chance at all that the National Low Income Housing Coalition will ever just go to the gazillionaires (Zuckerman, Bezos, Soros) and tell them to cough up the needed funds?
Why does it have to be money grabbed from the few still working and paying taxes?
Because they hate us.
It also endorses converting the $46 billion Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP), a temporary measure passed during the pandemic, into a permanent program.
And here we find the real goal of her complaint. Bureaucrats need a way to pay for their very expensive housing too.
As they say, never let a crisis go to waste.
Liberals love disasters. Disasters give them an opportunity to implement entitlement programs to address the disaster and then they try to keep that program in place long after the disaster is long past.
Maxine Waters also thinks it's shameful that manholes get manhole covers for free from the government, but woman holes bleed constantly unless you stick tampons in them.
Gimme. More.
Check also this link
This is great. Add all the libs pork back in so the bill can be killed again. I like it.
The horse faced hag must not see enough grift in the bill for her liking. She epitomizes everything thing wrong with congress.
Cengage Physics JEE Mains And Advanced Pdf Download
Cengage Physics JEE Mains And Advanced Pdf Download
Housing costs are skyrocketing!
Let's help poor people pay part of the bill!
WTF? Their rent went up by the same amount as the subsidy? What in heck is going on here!
I want a solution to unaffordable housing. But just paying the absurd rents real estate monoliths are demanding is not it. Waters does not play chess. She's among the least impressive Democrats its my shame to be associated with.
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/maxine-waterss-6-best-career-moments
6 best moments. ONE involves writing a law. If she'd been elected in 2016, she'd likely be part of "The Squad". Other very vocal Democrats that don't end up actually doing very much. All heat, no light.
The NLIHC has long advocated additional federal spending and renter protection as a remedy to America's rising housing costs, while willfully ignoring the evidence that these are in fact the cause of higher housing costs. (Or at least, an important contributing cause.)
https://meekss.com/%d9%83%d9%8a%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%aa%d8%ba%d9%8a%d9%8a%d8%b1-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%b3%d9%88%d8%b1%d8%af-%d8%b4%d8%a8%d9%83%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%88%d8%a7%d9%8a-%d9%81%d8%a7%d9%8a-we/
Maxine Waters: "This Inflation Reduction Act is shameful! It's just not inflationary enough! Make it more inflationary!"
A modest $1.6 billion. Well, if it's that modest, send it to me. "Libertarians" calling $1.6 billion of government spending "modest" -- more proof, as if it were needed, that 'reason' is a libterd false flag operation.
Maxine done be wantin mo money for EBT and shit so deys wimin be gettin deys weaves and deys nails an shit.
She also be wantin free housing in middle class hoods an shit where deys too many whiteys.
upset that the slush fund for her 'non profit' campaign supporters isn't being replenished. more idiot democrats with increased spending and higher taxes during an inflation. they don't care about the bottom half of society which it will hurt the most, they only care about getting elected and expanding their power
I'm not sure which is more stupid...this moron's "There isn't enough spending in this anti-inflation bill" or AOC's "Unemployment is low because everyone is working two jobs!"
What a witch!
There isn't enough vote-buying in the bill, so she won't vote for it??!?!?!?
What's shameful is grown men and women seeking to use the power of the State to live off the labor of other men and women.
What's more shameful is the politicians who facilitate this process by buying some people's votes with other people's paychecks.
Democrat voters should grow up and support themselves.
They don't, because they're toddlers still looking to suck on the government tit.