Venue Cancels Dave Chappelle Performance, Vows To Become 'the Safest Space'
"We hear you and we are sorry."

First Avenue, a concert venue in Minneapolis, Minnesota, canceled a planned performance by comedian Dave Chappelle—mere hours before he was slated to take the stage.
The venue explicitly cited criticism from progressives, who view the platforming of Chappelle as an act of violence against the transgender community, given his jokes about this group.
"To staff, artists, and our community, we hear you and we are sorry," wrote a spokesperson for First Avenue in a statement. "We know we must hold ourselves to the highest standards, and we let you down."
The statement goes on to describe First Avenue venues as "the safest spaces" in the country.
"We believe in diverse voices and the freedom of artistic expression, but in honoring that, we lost sight of the impact this would have," noted the venue's organizers.
We hear you. Tonight's show has been cancelled at First Avenue and is moving to the Varsity Theater. See our full statement for more. pic.twitter.com/tkf7rz0cc7
— First Avenue (@FirstAvenue) July 20, 2022
First Avenue can invite and disinvite whomever it wants, of course. But it's hard to see this move as anything other than cowardly and counterproductive.
For one thing, canceling the performance does not even accomplish the narrow goal of stopping Chappelle from speaking. As the statement noted, the performance was merely being transferred to an alternative location—and all ticket holders will be able to watch him there. If ever there was an example of virtue signaling, this is it.
Then again, is it really virtuous to punish a comedian for engaging in transgressive artistic expression? First Avenue never used to think so. The venue is featured heavily in Prince's film, Purple Rain, and was known for promoting artists who defied boundaries and flouted social conventions. Today, First Avenue is afraid of offending a small number of hypersensitive progressives.
The cancel-Chappelle crowd is probably greatly outnumbered by the crowd that thinks trying to silence offensive comedy is a silly proposition. Indeed, First Avenue is likely to receive even more negative attention now while simultaneously ensuring Chappelle himself a larger crowd, more attention, and some new material. There is a Streisand effect to all of this: The lame attempts to get Chapelle in trouble are too weak to succeed and, in fact, only make him a bigger star.
"The more you say I can't say something, the more urgent it is for me to say it," Chappelle says in his recent Netflix special, What's in a Name? "And it has nothing to do with what you're saying I can't say. It has everything to do with my right, my freedom of artistic expression."
Netflix, which employs Chappelle and recently added an "artistic expression" policy to its employee handbook, has the right of it: If you're bothered by provocative material, maybe the entertainment business isn't for you.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The safest space is one nobody goes to.
Is that from ‘Mein Kampf’?
Pathetic troll.
Piss off Misek.
You’ll have to beg and whine better than that, Jew.
It’s in your blood.
Observe these begging and whining Jews publicly claiming a holocaust of 6 million Jews in various nations no less than 166 times between 1900 and 1945. Begging and whining, lying for money. Oh the poor jooos. Like the wastes of skin who fake cancer on go fund me pages.
http://wearswar.wordpress.com/2017/10/31/repeated-claims-of-6-million-jews-dying-decades-before-hitler-vs-ignored-soviet-death-camp-tolls/
You’re a LITERAL nazi. You’re a Holocaust denier, and a massive anti semite. YOU are the troll. No one wants you here. So if you don’t like being treated like the Nazi you profess to be, GTFO.
You’re a lying waste of skin Jew.
Just because I prove it doesn’t make me any of the things you are claiming.
Your bullshit has no effect on me. I don’t care how you feel. That’s on you. I value and share the truth that you will never refute.
If you don’t like having your nose rubbed in in, accept the truth or you can fuck off. I really don’t care either way.
The most pathetic thing about you Nazi scum is that you destroy what you claim to love. No Jew was ever as bad for the "Ayran race" as being ruled by you. The stupidity, cruelty, censorship and amazingly ennui that you inflicted on your own kind is worse than anything your enemies would have.
When you take the holocaust lie out of the picture, Jews and Nazis are very similar. In fact history shows that Jews have behaved worse for a much longer time.
Both part of satanic secret societies, Jews claim ownership of the Freemasons, Nazis the Thule society.
Nazis considered themselves the master race, Jews the chosen people.
In fact Nazism was the result of the behaviour of Jews.
In WW1 Jews betrayed Germany by bringing the US into WW1 in exchange for the Balfour declaration, Britain’s illegitimate promise of Palestine.
This recognition and the German peoples suffering under the treaty of Versailles and the Weimar Republic changed their perception of Jews and they effectively democratically elected the Nazi party.
Then Jews globally declared war and promised to bring a world war to Germany and they succeeded with global boycotts giving Germany only two alternatives, abdicate democracy or war. They chose the latter.
Then after millions of more deaths, Jews stole Palestine beginning the last 76 years of the Middle East conflict, wars terrorism more death and destruction.
Israel is an apartheid state.
The holocaust is a lie. What’s a Jew without the bullshit Nazi narrative?
Only what you can’t refute, above.
6 million Jews and 5 million Slavs, Romani, Poles, Homosexuals, buiness leaders, labor leaders, political opponents, the elderly, the mentally infirm and many others all would have been safer if they didn't go where your ilk sent them!
Fuck Off, Nazi
Don't forget all the children that the Nazis used as cannon fodder despite knowing that they were only delaying the inevitable.
My German language teacher was conscripted at 11 and had to stay outside loading AA guns during bombing raids instead of taking shelter as children should do in such dire circumstances.
-jcr
AA guns to atop the bombing of children.
Your teacher obviously lived.
Hey there Bobby, here's a fun fact for you: Hitler would have killed you first. Nazi Germany was not a good place for people with your mental disabilities.
-jcr
Yet you have never refuted anything I’ve said.
How does that make you feel?
Um ... kinda like everybody is wasting their time talking to a Nazi and you should go DIAF?
Hahaha.
S2bu
And not one shred of admissible or physical evidence to prove your ridiculous claim.
But mountains of irrefutable physical and logical scientific evidence refuting it. All illegal to recognize in every nation where the bullshit allegedly occurred.
If you think that there is any physical evidence for a holocaust, you’re wrong.
Video, pictures of what? Piles of bodies during war? People in German uniforms? Dime a dozen and easily staged. No photos, none of the equipment that supposedly killed millions. There exists no physical evidence of that at all.
Prison camps aren’t evidence of a holocaust.
I’ve refuted “eyewitness testimony” as impossible right here. Every so called witness has either been paid or coerced making their bullshit legally inadmissible.
The following points refute key elements of the holocaust with logic and science. This is because all stories creating the holocaust narrative defy logic and science.
There has been no objective forensic analysis at any supposed site. That means that there is no physical evidence. Any activity that demonstrates and shares evidence to refute the holocaust is a crime in every nation where it allegedly occurred.
The crucial event of the story is the cyanide gassing of millions of Jews. That never happened.
Jews wrote books illustrated with pictures of themselves shirtless dragging gassed bodies from the chambers to cremation ovens.
But cyanide is absorbed through the skin and NOBODY could have survived a single day of such activity much less collecting reparations into their old age reminiscing about it years later.
And so it goes with every bullshit story. The facts prove otherwise.
Let’s not forget another old timey favourite.The story of Babi Yar is a popular lesson in Jewish schools described as the single largest event of the holocaust.
The lesson is that between 30,000 and 100,000 Jews were taken to a ravine in Ukraine where they were killed.
The story is told by one Jewish
survivor, Dina Pronicheva, an actress who testified that she was forced to strip naked and marched to the edge of the ravine. When the firing squad shot, she jumped into the ravine and played dead. After being covered by thousands of bodies and tons of earth she dug herself out, unscathed, when the coast was clear and escaped to tell the story.
She is apparently the only person in history to successfully perform a matrix bullet dodge at a firing squad. The soldier aiming point blank at her never noticed her escape. Never walked a few steps to the edge of the ravine to finish her off.
They were stripped naked to leave no evidence. Naked she had no tools to dig herself out from under 30,000 bodies and tons of dirt.
Only after the deed was done, the nazis realized that so many bullet ridden bodies were evidence. Oops, rookie move. So they brought more Jews and millions of cubic feet of firewood to dig them up, cremate them on gravestones and scatter their ashes in surrounding fields.
There has been no forensic investigation at the site. None of the bullets allegedly burned with the bodies have been recovered. Not one shred of physical evidence of this has ever been found.
There are military aerial photographs of the area at the time but they don’t show any evidence of the narrative, no people, no equipment, no firewood, no moved earth, no tracks of any kind.
Simply stating these facts is a crime in Ukraine where the Babi Yar narrative is taught in school
Have you ever heard of the Bletchley park decrypts of the famous German enigma machines? It was credited for turning the tide of the war as allies knew what military actions the Germans were planning.
Only released in the 1980s those translated messages included prison camp information, deaths, transfers and requests for medicines to treat illnesses. The numbers of dead don’t support the holocaust narrative of which there was also no mention of.
Are you willingly performing the feeble mental gymnastics required to believe, as the story goes, that Germans were communicating in code about prison camps while talking plainly about their military actions with their top secret enigma machines?
The numbers of dead from German enigma decrypts does align with Red Cross numbers.
The Red Cross regularly visited all prison camps. It was their job to report the cause of all deaths. They recorded a grand total of 271,000 among all camps for the entire war. It is a matter of record.
Are you performing the feeble mental gymnastics required to believe that the Red Cross were so incompetent that they were completely unaware of 95% or 5,629,000 deaths?
Zyklon B is an off the shelf insecticide used among other places in Prison camps to delouse clothing and bedding to save lives by preventing deadly typhus. The system used for years before the war employed heating to release cyanide gas, fans to circulate the gas and more to exhaust the chambers to make the de loused articles safe to handle.
Pictures of this equipment and the small de lousing buildings with clothing racks still exist in Prison camps. But no evidence of any gas delivery system has ever been found in the shower houses where the bullshit holocaust allegedly occurred. In fact, the story has changed to that they just threw the heat activated pellets onto the cold drainless floors in rooms full of people.
Such an inefficient method would have taken too long to kill the required number of Jews. The pellets couldn’t be spread evenly in rooms full of people. The cold drainless floors would have delayed the release of cyanide from the pellets that people would have swept away from themselves. Any dead would have released all their bodily fluids and their bodies covering the pellets. Vomit would have been added to the floor prior to entering such a room.
According to Martin Gilbert in his book, Holocaust Journey, the gas chambers at Treblinka utilized carbon monoxide from diesel engines. At the Nuremberg trial of the Nazi war criminals, the American government charged that the Jews were murdered at Treblinka in “steam chambers,” not gas chambers.
Gasoline engine exhaust contains about ten times the carbon monoxide than diesel. Diesel exhaust is relatively safe. Even if the Diesel engines were running at their maximum of 500 ppm, death would take several hours. Far too long to support the narrative.
If Germans had used gas engines, death would have been in a few minutes. But in the holocaust narrative for treblinka diesel was used even though they had plenty of gas for their tanks. Nuremberg still recorded that they were “steam chambers”.
Which stupid lie is more believable? You have to perform some feeble mental gymnastics to buy that.
Jews had been publicly claiming a holocaust of 6 million Jews in various nations no less than 166 times between 1900 and 1945. Only to coerce sympathy to raise money. Like the wastes of skin who fake cancer on go fund me pages.
The story of gassing Jews began as British propaganda to turn popular opinion against Germany. It was inspired to draw attention away from Jewish Bolshevik war crimes in Russia because that would work against allied propaganda. It also served global Jewish interests to create undeserved sympathy for Jews who had publicly organized boycotts of Germany to drive Germany to war.
There is a documented letter from the head of British propaganda to the head of the war office recommending that they cease the “gassing Jews“ propaganda because there was no evidence for it and if found out would work against their propaganda efforts.
The only thing the bullshit holocaust narrative has in common with WW2 is that they were both the creation of Jews.
These Jewish leaders are admitting it. Are they lying?
“We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany”.
David A Brown, national chairman, united Jewish campaign, 1934.
“The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany …holy war against Hitlers people”
Chaim Weismann, the Zionist leader, 8 September 1939, Jewish chronicle.
The Toronto evening telegram of 26 February 1940 quoted rabbi Maurice l. Perlzweig of the world Jewish Congress as telling a Canadian audience that” The world Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years”.
Refute that fuckwits, shove it where the sun doesn’t shine or fuck off. I don’t care which.
Well said, lol
Who'd have imagined? In the city where George Floyd happened, people are afraid of letting a black man speak his mind.
Maybe they revoked his blackness.
They may be afraid of another black man getting murdered in a public venue.
Chris Rock lived.
First Avenue should be run out of business. The woke mafia must be wiped out.
censorship does not provide safety.
If you truly believe that words can harm or kill you, you don't see it that way.
That's correct.
It's also based on a completely false premise. And anyone who genuinely believes that way is a fucking idiot.
Tony
For a few hundred bucks, we might be able to get Chapelle to perform his show here.
"First Avenue can invite and disinvite whomever it wants, of course."
Not exactly. As I understand it these things are generally done by written contracts. They can only disinvite people as allowed by the contracts.
If I were a performing artist I would not sign a contract with a venue that didn't include financial penalties for cancelation by the venue and penalties that increase significantly the closer to the performance they cancel.
The venue should have to both refund every ticket sold and still pay Chappelle every cent he would be due had the performance not been canceled.
If I were a performing artist I would not sign a contract with a venue that didn't include financial penalties for cancelation by the venue and penalties that increase significantly the closer to the performance they cancel.
The venue should have to both refund every ticket sold and still pay Chappelle every cent he would be due had the performance not been canceled.
I'm fairly certain you're mistaken if you think Chappelle and the ticketing agent didn't get paid, at least in part, despite the performance being cancelled.
"I'm fairly certain you're mistaken if you think Chappelle and the ticketing agent didn't get paid, at least in part, despite the performance being cancelled."
1. I never said I think that, nor do I believe that anything I said gives you valid reason to think I think that.
2. Given that the cancelation was just hours before the performance, in my opinion, partial payment would not be sufficient.
The fact that Chapelle was able to find another venue should not make any difference to the obligations of the original venue.
Yep.
If I were a performing artist I would not sign a contract with a venue that didn't include financial penalties for cancelation by the venue and penalties that increase significantly the closer to the performance they cancel.
Word. And if that cancellation were on ideological grounds, then the penalties would septuple.
And if that cancellation were on ideological grounds, then the penalties would septuple.
In most cases hard to prove. They can always cite ‘safety’.
Actually, yes exactly. But with the understanding that contract terms must be met, just as you mention.
For the business, it's a calculation of which choice brings the most long term benefit/profit. It might actually be cheaper for them to pay the penalties for cancelling the contract.
I hope Chappelle makes them hurt as much as possible over this. There should be severe consequences for wokescolds.
It wasn't actually cancelled. Read the article next time.
*Throws gun at Jim Logajan, shouts "Defend yourself!", and fires*
He had a contract with the specific venue. That Chapelle was able to find another venue should not absolve the first venue from any contractual obligations.
Yeah, cancel a sold out show, lose all the revenue from concessions etc, and he just moved the show and still holds it. What exactly did they accomplish other than looking like dicks?
Maybe they want to make beacoup bucks by booking all the hilarious SJW comedians who would boycott them if they didn't break their contract with Chappelle.
Oh, wait.
-jcr
SJW ‘comedians’. Let’s be clear
Right. Also known as "applause comics".
-jcr
They went woke. Now let’s see if they go broke.
Dave Chappelle is overrated anyway. So what, he had a TV show that was popular when I was in elementary school?
If he ever had any talent, he's clearly past his prime now. Transphobic "jokes" are just lazy and weak. There is literally nothing funny about the fact that some men are born with front holes instead of dicks. Or that these men have to buy products marketed as "feminine hygiene" to deal with their monthly bleeding. Or that they get noncancerous chest tissue surgically removed, leaving severe scars and likely showing a lack of pectoral muscle beneath. Nope. Not funny at all.
Wanna know who is still very funny? Stephen Colbert. THAT is a talented comedian.
#LibertariansForCancelCulture
Almost fell for it, until I read who wrote it. Good stuff.
The claim that Colbert is in the least humorous should have been a gimme.
Yeah that was the first clue, so read who posted it. He got me, I admit it.
Yup. He had me going until I got to 'front holes'. Still parody falling short of reality if there actually are trans advocates using the term 'front hole'.
There are.
I don't get it. I never met anyone who doesn't have a mouth. How would they eat without one? I can't imagine one can absorb many nutrients by suppositories alone.
LOL. Well done sir!
Stephen Colbert is as funny as a trip to a high school principal’s office
No, he’s not. In junior high school I had a trip to the principal’s office that ended up being funnier than anything Colbert has done on his propaganda show.
Since when don't men have breasts? I think they don't have mammary glands, but those aren't exactly synonymous.
One of your very best!
First Avenue, a concert venue in Minneapolis, Minnesota, canceled a planned performance by comedian Dave Chappelle—mere hours before he was slated to take the stage.
"There are two black people in Minnesota, Prince and Kirby Puckett"
Was two black people.
Used to be 4
Remember the joke from How I Met Your Mother.
Are there any black people in Minnesota?
Only when Prince is not on tour.
Wait, their mission is to be the safest space in the country?
Ok, then.
Good news, if you want to book that venue for something they'll probably be available most nights. Because who would book them?
Susan Cho comes to mind.
Maybe Rob Misek will take the gig. That sonofabitch is as funny as hell.
The left is absolutely crazy.
Mass psychosis is a thing
First Avenue can invite and disinvite whomever it wants, of course.
Now try "no black performers allowed".
I can agree with this statement to the extent they have no obligation to sign a contract with him, but they did so they lose a lot of leeway in that right to not associate with him. As it stands I can only hope they lose out on bookings as they're untrustworthy.
""First Avenue can invite and disinvite whomever it wants, of course.""
Good thing they're not bakers eh.
Bakers who places words on the cake can refuse to write the words but they cannot refuse to bake the cake. The words make it forced speech which is unconstitutional. The venue might make the argument* that Chappelle's homophobic speech reflects on the venue and as such would be impermissible forced speech for the venue. But no one here is forcing Chappelle to say anything (if that was even possible.) So it isn't like a cake baker at all, but if you want to stretch it there, then the "baker" is the venue and not Chappelle.
*IANAL and I'm not sure I'd buy the argument that Chappelle's speech would be understood by the average person as endorsed by the venue, but I think it's a valid argument to make and defend.
Chappelle isn’t homophobic. He just tells jokes. The woke mafia can’t take a joke, amd wants to control what people say. First Avenue are wokescolds. They should be made to suffer as much as possible for cancelling Chappelle’s performance. As should, any group that pressured them.
The woke are enemies of America. Destroy them before they do the same to us.
The woke mafia can’t take a joke,
There's a reason why they can't of course. Lefturds can't stand any criticism, and humor in particular is effective in deflating their pretenses.
-jcr
Word!
The irony is this is the exact kind of shit Chappelle called out in his comedy special that everyone clutched their pearls over.
All they are doing is proving him right, and it's hilarious to watch.
I guess the trans activists that are calling for this behavior never watched the special, since if they had they would realize their exact behavior is what he took issue with. He even spells it out, in that he doesn't have a particular issue with trans people he takes issue with white people.
*IANAL
Not a reader of facts either apparently. The owner of the bakery offered them anything off the shelf, just not a custom wedding cake. The Commission found this to be unduly discriminatory. SCOTUS looked at the Commission's history and found them to be unduly discriminatory of religion, not in violation of free speech. Kennedy even noted in his opinion that he would've ruled in favor of The Commission if they'd been more deferential to religious institutions in other cases.
Since Chapelle is well known, and his comedy is well known, they chose to offer him a venue, then withdrew it at the last moment. If they didn't want his style of comedy, they shouldn't have offered it in the first place. You also don't seem to be familiar with the Masterpiece Cake case.
Read headline.
Post outraged comment.
Then maybe read the actual article to discover you've been had.
Speaking of "cancel-proof" stuff going on right now, YoungRippa is at $3 million for his "crowdfunding" goal of $100,000.
That has been such a great thing. A creator self-funding and promoting his passion after watching it be mutilated by the mainstream, the mainstream creators with their mask-off envy and hatred. It's made better by revealing the racism of their worldview as they cope with a libertarian black man interested in good stories, good characters and a coherent canon not the latest leftist grievance.
The article tries to make it sound like Chappelle is transgressing in a positive way, a way that expands human understanding of some edgy subject. But that's not what he's doing. He's doing the equivalent of anti-Semitic or racist comedy at time where the public is starting to find it un-funny. His homophobic jokes are great at validating people's tightly held bigotry for the moment, but over time as more people view LGBT Americans as just another neighbor, he's going to be remember as an asshole.
"The more you say I can't say something, the more urgent it is for me to say it," Chappelle says in his recent Netflix special...
White comedians using the N-word are totally not going to parrot this. And if they do, Chappelle will support it. Totally.
So you've never seen any of his material.
Ah, once again I see that I've responded to someone (above) with logic and arguments when, again, I should've just thrown a gun at them, shouted "Defend yourself!", and shot them.
I've responded to someone (above) with logic and arguments
You've done nothing of the kind, you knee-jerking twat.
-jcr
Oh, it's John C. Rambo! I really missed you John, especially when the footage of officer Ruiz being turned away from kicking in the door in Uvalde and having his weapon taken away showed up. Are you here to tell everyone what a piece of shit all cops, including Ruiz, are, dance on the grave of his wife, and brag to everyone about what a Tier 1+ Operator you are?
Go ahead, tell us all what a huge tuff guy who's so much different from every other shitbag cop who shoots first and asks questions later you are.
You're such a fucking tool that I wouldn't even toss you the gun because we all already know that you'd see it coming and just know that, despite the "I'm not an authoritarian asshat just like every other cop. I'm better than any every cop and operator on the planet." bravado you exude, you know you're not even worth the bullet and too much of a pussy to do the job yourself.
I don't know who you are or what your beef with me is, but I urge you to get your meds adjusted. You don't have to be this way.
-jcr
Seriously, you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about. My comment was to Diane Reynolds (Paul.) about a comment I made to him in another thread about shooting blatanly disingenuous shitbags like shawn_dude. My reference to "above" was about how shawn_dude almost certainly willfully misrepresented the facts of the Masterpiece Cakeshop trial.
But you don't give a shit about any of that do you? You show up on the scene unannounced and uninvited, tiny dick first, shoot the bad guys, the good guys, maybe a couple of dogs, other portions of the regional wildlife, declare yourself better than anyone on the scene, including everyone you shot in the back, and walk off like everyone can't see that you're the most stupid, immoral asshat on the scene.
So, what does the 'C.' stand for, John? Cocksucker? Chesticle? Cumguzzler? Cuntrag?
Oh, I see. You're a self-hating closet case. That explains so much.
Get yourself some serious professional help, and kindly spare us your lurid homoerotic fixations.
-jcr
mad.casual July.21.2022 at 10:24 pm
Seriously, you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about.
...
John C. Randolph July.22.2022 at 3:15 am
I don't know who you are or what your beef with me is
So, as I said up front, no fucking clue, but you're sure the problem is me. Thanks, SJW Randolph!
More proof that leftists are very much NOT the cool kids anymore
Meh, his last couple of specials just weren't funny. Not that he said anything particularly offensive. I didn't find his trans stuff offensive, but it is getting outdated. It's time to write some new jokes, but he just might be out of touch and out of material at this point.
Never heard of DC until the uproar with "The Closer". My husband told me about his comedic history, his rants against blacks on crack, and so forth. He showed me Youtube clips with DC and Joe Rogan, and I was literally hooked. I had a few decades of material to catch up. Thus we watched together, as a married gay couple, and we laughed our butts off. It was so good I watched it during the week three more times. His story about his Trans friend who committed suicide, because the Trans Twitts excoriated him/her, was poignant to the point I cried each time. That DC set aside money for the daughter was beyond compassionate, selfless and hero material. DC has bigger balls than any SJW keyboard warrior. It would be delicious if he orchestrated a hostile purchase of the venue, First Avenue, then converted it into a homeless shelter.
Oh, and by the way, could you describe and identify the "public that is starting to find it un-funny"?
That would be the SJWs. A pack of snotty little cunts who get far more attention than their numbers warrant.
-jcr
Oh look, another comment from John "I don't have the first fucking clue!" Randolph. It's a rhetorical question you retard. We all appreciate you taking the time out of your busy schedule of pissing on cops, soldiers, and other random peoples' graves to give us the obvious answers to the questions you think don't have obvious answers.
Next time, do us all a favor, pick shawn_dude's side and quit proving to the rest of us that our side will never want for intellectually vacuous morons.
pissing on cops, soldiers, and other random peoples' graves
What the fuck are you talking about?
-jcr
There’s a mute option. To quote Neil Stephenson, “arguing with a stranger on the internet is a losers game. They turn out to be, or are equivalent to, a self righteous 16 year old with infinite amounts of time.”
Some posters her about just want nothing more than to gin up a thread of outrage literally over nothing. I suspect it’s all they have.
Much funnier than Chappelle: Bill Burr, Shane Gillis, Mark Normand
In the future, transsexualism will be regarded as a past medical atrocity, like bloodletting, tape worm ingestion for weight loss, electric shock treatment for depression, or lobotomies. Our descendants will not understand how we allowed it.
More like the frontal lobotomy for poor impulse control.
Both of you are correct. Its going to be something we look back at and cringe. Like the man-boy relationships (fucking) of the Greco-Roman times, people will look back and say "well these people clearly drifted a little bit too far into insanity" for a time.
Fuck you. I personally know several trans people and they are all much happier people after transitioning. Don't be an asshole.
LOL. You have just outed yourself as a troll. Well played!
Suicidal ideations with a plan increase after Trans transition. It is on pubmed. There is a reason why the UK and other European countries no longer support transitioning in the young.
Delusional people often appear happy. That's one of reasons that treatment of personality disorders is controversial in psychiatry.
"I personally know several trans people and they are all much happier people after transitioning."
Rock solid evidence presented here.
"tape worm ingestion for weight loss,"
Hey, at least the "biodynamic" diet works, that's more than you can say about some of those treatments.
Nah. The dude is funny. Always was. Pull your panties out of your ass. Open a beer. Light up a smoke. You'll thank me later.
" I know comics that are very racist, and I watch them on stage and everyone’s laughing and I’m like, mmm that motherfucker means that shit. Don’t get mad at them, don’t hate them. We go upstairs and have a beer, sometimes I even appreciate the artistry that they paint their racist opinions with. Man, it’s not that serious. The First Amendment is first for a reason, the Second Amendment is just in case the first one doesn’t work out."
"There’s something so true about this genre when done correctly that I will fight anybody that gets in a true practitioner of this art form’s way, because I know you’re wrong. This is the truth and you are obstructing it. I’m not talking about the content, I’m talking about the art form. "
Chapelle accepting his Mark Twain award for comedy. Sounds much more like a 1A supporter than you think he is.
So you're a statist bootlicker conformist. Got it.
No, you just want to control people. This is how you do it. Since you leftists are pussies that can’t do it by real force. If Americans realized that all it would take is backhanding you progs a few times to straighten you out, your kind would be back in it’s place and America a much better place to live.
What would things been like [in Russia] if during periods of mass arrests people had not simply sat there, paling with terror at every bang on the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but understood they had nothing to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people?—Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
You must be a lot of fun at parties.
-jcr
Brilliant! Just brilliant! I mean, with all the time you spent in the Special Forces and being held back from kicking in doors in Uvalde, you'd think you'd have heard a better putdown than a throwaway line from Bill Murray in the 80s.
Why do you sign your comments? We can see your username. Do you also have a tattoo of your name on your back?
Why do you sign your comments?
Mostly because it make some people flip out. Used to happen all the time on /., but you're the first whackjob to bitch about it on reason.com.
With luck, maybe you'll work yourself into enough of a snit that you'll pop an aneurysm and improve the world.
-jcr
Tell me you've not seen his comedy without saying you have not seen his comedy.
https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1549553122401476610
"Doc Marie’s is a lesbian bar that opened on July 1st of this year with the hope of bringing more inclusivity to the city of Portland. But just one week after their grand opening they were forced to shut down because of complaints that the bar was not a “safe space.” Similar to the story I wrote a few weeks ago about the queer-owned cafe in Philadelphia that was shut down by employees for not being woke enough, Doc Marie’s was cannibalized by the woke mob."
The workers who showed up, after about 5 minutes, demanded equal shares of ownership of the company, and used charges of racism and bigotry, not making things "safe" for black/brown/LGBTQ etc. Literally the same playbook the children at evergreen used to take over the woke-catering administrators and ruin that universities reputation, funding, and trajectory.
Sometimes, the cancer outgrows its own blood supply and the cells/tissue will rot due to the overgrowth of the disease itself. Unfortunately, that usually leads to the organism dying too. Unless its cut out, quickly.
This story is so great on so many levels.
One would need to have a heart of stone not to laugh.
Sure, until you realize that people who think exactly like this are running corporate America these days.
Yeah, I heard about this. I'm not sure what more can be said about stuff like this. It's funny on the surface, but it's also expected. When you literally open a business that explicitly caters to the wokest of woke ideologies, you think you're not going to have employees revolt? That's literally the purpose of your business, to create a space for revolution.
The problem as usual, is the evil of capitalism. Somebody somewhere actually had to have a business plan and invest in this wonderful dream. This is just icky. Now if the government tore down a nuke plant and created a safe place for deviants and groomers or something it would all be cool.
Ya. I really dont know how you successfully create a money generating, successful business that caters to green/purple haired, fat, ugly, low IQ marxists with a mission of turning over society, for "equity" (read: they are in charge, instead).
Its hard to be a Kulak/Bourgeois and cater to a group of people who's sole purpose is to overthrow you.
They probably should have moved to Austin, TX and opened a gay bar there. Would have been an infinitely smarter business decision. But if they want to stay poor, thats fine too.
low IQ marxists
Is there any other kind?
-jcr
Sure: there are deluded Marxist followers hoping for a better world and there are psychopathic but highly intelligent Marxist leaders working hard to gain power and wealth.
there are psychopathic but highly intelligent Marxist leaders
I could perhaps describe Mao or Xi as shrewd, but if they were "highly intelligent", they'd realize that as kleptocrats, they would be far better off if they didn't murder quite so many of their slaves.
-jcr
What's that? John C. Randolph can't distinguish between someone with a low IQ and someone with a high IQ? Is anyone surprised?
Your ignorance, feigned or other, is so convincing NYOB2 feels the need to explain it to you. Too bad that we aren't still in the Cold War. This war against Marxism is going to go completely over your head.
distinguish between someone with a low IQ and someone with a high IQ?
I can spot a moron like you from miles away.
-jcr
mad.casual July.21.2022 at 10:24 pm
Seriously, you don't even know what the fuck you're talking about.
...
John C. Randolph July.22.2022 at 3:15 am
I don't know who you are or what your beef with me is
So, as I said up front, no fucking clue, but you're sure the problem is me. Thanks, SJW Randolph!
Pretty self-evident that you couldn't spot even a modest thinker like me with hours of advanced notice, 10 minutes after we said we'd be there, *or* 20 min. after we've arrived.
"Ya. I really dont know how you successfully create a money generating, successful business that caters to green/purple haired, fat, ugly, low IQ marxists with a mission of turning over society, for "equity" (read: they are in charge, instead)."
You take over self sustaining brands, and ride the coattails of inertia based on past performance/product, lack of real competition, and too big to fail.
It sounds like the workers were expecting to use the business as another Antifa training front, and got pissed off when they were told "no."
The workers who showed up, after about 5 minutes, demanded equal shares of ownership
This is a failure of parenting more than anything else. It's obvious that these idiots were raised by cowards who gave in to every absurd demand they ever made when they were toddlers.
-jcr
Millennials and Zoomers in a nutshell, and the end result of Dr. Spock's "spare the rod and spoil the child" philosophy.
Careful with the broad brush, there. Not everyone in those generations were raised by lefturds.
-jcr
This is a failure of parenting more than anything else.
If only there were just one way that parents could utterly fail their children and turn them into pretentious dickbags.
Nature and nurture acting together to mess up the Portland kids
Leftists are literally cancer.
Do with that what you will, but we're running out of time.
Just find another baker. If they don't want you to perform in their club, you can just do it elsewhere. Your freedom of speech has not been violated just because some private club refuse to have you.
Do you feel as though you have added something of use to the conversation?
The First Amendment was not violated here, but a contract sure might have been. And we can think something is dumb without it being actually illegal.
Dear White people: As a Black (don’t forget gay) man who is GOP Proud I’m glad you have a Black friend like Dave Chapelle who makes you feel ok about your bigotry. But, really, come on… *I’ve* been here for a long time and as long as you contribute money to my givesendgo (givesendgo/Ali) account to combat the Jan 6th hoax I’ll be glad to give you benediction for using the term “nigger” once in a while. You’re ok… I’m ok.
And before you try to own me just know that I’m both Black and gay while Dave Chapelle is only Black so I can also give you permission to use the term “faggot” too. Two for one. (Givesendgo.com/Ali)
Dave Chapelle is funny.
"We believe in diverse voices and the freedom of artistic expression, but only if we like what you have to say"
Yeah, they're sorry.
Why is it that "safe spaces" are the most dictatorial places where mob rule is the norm?
First Venue can decide to cancel an event for pretty much any reason, but will need to face the ramifications of their decision. In addition to any contractual penalties, First Avenue need to face blow-back from the community.
While the woke crowd is loud and in your face, they are nowhere near a majority. The broader populace while less vocal is tiring of the woke crowd and tired of violating the woke crowds undefined and idiotic rules.
Even members of the woke crowd can become victims of the woke crowd, because the rules are constantly changing according to the whims of the feral woke crowd.
Comedy at its very essence illuminates a bit of truth carried to an extreme example to illustrate the absurdity of human existence. If humanity is incapable of self-reflection and finding humor is our own proclivities.
Singling out one group and not other groups can be problematic, but good comedians don't single out one group but tend to joke about all groups. Dave Chappelle includes all groups, but some group believe that they should be elevate above all other groups and safe from punch lines that expose their absurdities.
I find Dave Chappelle funny even when I am the brunt of the joke. I find the human experience and how humans react, believe and behave to be ripe with hilarity. Over-reactions, inconsistent logic, illogical analysis, narcissistic tendencies among others are all items that with a bit of humor a comedian can bring people back to a more reasonable state.
Humor is good for a society and comedians are semi social workers and semi psychologist. The woke crowd that successfully persuaded First Avenue to cancel Dave Chappelle, need Dave Chappelle and his humor. Instead of faking being insulted, develop a thicker skin and be introspective.
Wow. Does the concession serve marshmallows too?
So rather than make money, the venue wishes to go hroke! More power to them.
"We believe in diverse voices and the freedom of artistic expression, but in honoring that, we lost sight of the impact this would have". The cowards have mastered doublespeak to bow down to totalitarians. INGSOC would be proud.
First Avenue venues as "the safest spaces.
It's not safe for free speech. In fact it is killer of free speech.
If the venue were a restaurant preventing a black man from having a meal, the left would go ape sheet and they would be sued and have their license revoked. Doing the same for Constitutionally protected free speech....as long as it moves us closer to 1984, who cares.