Thousands of Lawsuits Have Been Filed Over Wait Times, Backlogs at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
While staffing up may alleviate the bottleneck, no amount of employees can keep the country's bad immigration system from working as designed.

Despite pledges from the Biden administration last year to combat processing delays and backlogs at U.S. immigration agencies, a new report published by Syracuse University finds that by the end of FY 2022 in September, over 6,000 lawsuits will have been filed against the federal government since September 2021 to compel action from U.S. immigration authorities. This is a 50 percent increase in lawsuits compared to the previous fiscal year.
But President Joe Biden can only shoulder so much of the blame. Shortly after former President Donald Trump took office in January 2017, the federal government implemented a broad hiring freeze on all nonmilitary employees that lasted for several months. In February 2020, the Trump administration directly targeted U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), freezing hiring for all nonasylum agent employees. Funded by the fees on paperwork submissions, USCIS' revenue dried up during the COVID-19 pandemic as applications dwindled, prompting the administration to furlough three-quarters of the government's immigration work force in the summer of 2020. Even though the furlough was resolved in August 2020 by Congress, many employees left the agency permanently, worried that it would become a permanent layoff.
While Biden lifted that hiring freeze in March 2021, many experts say the effects will persist. "When you implement a hiring freeze, what you're actually doing is shrinking more personnel," Jorge Loweree, managing director of programs and strategy at the American Immigration Council, tells Reason. He notes that Trump's actions did not lessen the agency's load but merely stopped it from replacing workers lost to attrition. "USCIS has had to do essentially more work with less staff and fewer resources, which has led to a tremendous backlog across most form times."
As Loweree points out, these delays can be incredibly pressing for refugees applying for asylum or temporary protected status (TPS). "Your application can take seven months, potentially well over a year to be adjudicated," he said. "When your TPS designation is only in place for 18 months, that's a significant problem because you end up receiving a benefit for a far shorter period of time."
A USCIS spokesperson pointed to what they see as promising trends in their processing ability: a 14 percent drop in the naturalization queue from January to September 2021, a reduction in the number of pending biometrics appointments from 1.4 million in January 2021 to 7,000 as of May 2022, and a full elimination of the "front-log" of cases awaiting intake processing that occurred in July 2021. They feel confident the agency will resolve these issues by the time it reaches its 95 percent hiring target by the end of 2022.
While staffing up may alleviate the federal government's current bottleneck, no amount of USCIS employees can keep the country's bad immigration system from working as designed. The larger problems with how we choose who can live here and for how long lie with U.S. immigration law and policy.
"Even if more agents are hired, aggressive streamlining will still be necessary," David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, tells Reason in an email. "It can't just be hiring more people without better systems."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Another article that just blindly assumes we need to import or allow High School graduates or less into this country any more. We should be deporting anyone having such qualifications and not here legally by the millions and moving towards automation and a reduction or the work week t 20 hours and reducing population by 25 to 50 million by the end of the Century
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (kzy-025) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line
visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://earncash91.tk
A more intelligent approach would be to take back the LP and use spoiler votes to eliminate prohibition laws. The US has exported laws making crimes of production and trade since 1925, after the Dem platform complained of a heroin addiction epidemic. In 1927 the income tax was weaponized and European stock markets changed to declining. Finally our own banking system and securities markets collapsed, yet Republicans insist this was coincidence. Exporting coercion, whether communist or christiano-fascist, creates poverty.
ERIC BAZAIL-EIMIL? Who's sock is this?
There are a large number of new names showing up, but the articles are the same.
Fire everyone.
Use third party to do background checks. Candidates who aren't criminals bid based on country of origin for available slots.
Fuck the subjective process with lots of steps and wait times.
Yup, it needs to be something like that.
The GOP and Dems define everyone but themselves as criminals, felons and/or "terrists".
Woohoo! The US definitely needs more people who are willing to sue for the slightest inconvenience.
Think of all the jobs they will provide, for lawyers, judges, clerks, and baliffs.
Well, a common argument against permitting refugees from seeking asylum is that while their case is pending, they have the opportunity to slip into the shadows of America and never bother showing up for their hearing, so those with very weak asylum cases get the benefit of asylum without having to prove the merits of their case. This argument only has salience because there are so many asylum cases and the wait times for pending cases are so long because there are not enough staff to deal with them all in a timely manner. So what if there was a great deal more staff to adjudicate these cases with very quick turnaround times? Then it would be far less likely that the refugee with the weak asylum case will have the opportunity to slip away, because that person's case will be decided very quickly and sent back for having the case rejected.
So if we want the system to function more properly, it will require more staff to deal with the huge number of cases.
Of course the much better solution IMO is a massive overhaul of immigration laws which obviates the incentive of migrants with weak asylum cases seeking asylum in the first place, since they would be able to get what they actually want - a chance to work legally to improve their life and the lives of their families.
Why do you feel the need to talk to prepubescent children about romantic love and/or mating, collectivistjeff?
He’s a fat fucking pervert. I hope his neighbors keep a close eye on their children.
Waiting 15 years to become a citizen is ridiculous. Some people make it through (because they have insiders) in just a few years, others wait decades. The system needs a revamp but MAGAs block it, thinking the brown people are taking over. MAGAs if you want more white people, have more white babies.
There's are much simpler solutiions to having too many asylum seekers to process in a timely fashion: Finish the damn wall, enforce the asylum-should-be-in-the-first-country-entered rule, and remain in Mexico. This article truly insults our intelligence.
The messed up process goes far beyond the asylum seekers. And it started long before Trump.
I have a client that came to the US in 1999, finished residency in 2004 and has been a 1%er in income ever since.
He started the process of citizenship in 1999. He finally was naturalized in 2016. High earning medical professional, American wife and child that was born a citizen. It still took 17 years.
We are now 6 years into the process with his brother, a highly successful businessman. Every type of visa has different rules. We have had to change corporate structure three times to accommodate each level of visa though the process.
The system is broken and no matter how many employees are hired, the system needs a complete overhaul.
Obama promised to work on immigration in the first 90 days of both of his terms. The promises worked well to get the votes.
Congress won't fix it, just as Obama didn't as each side uses immigration to hype up the base. Washington has no reason to fix it as it will cost a major fundraising issue.
The entire system is extremely messed up.
I wish more people who blithely say "well, why don't those illegal immigrants just follow the rules and immigrate the 'right way'?" could truly understand how the entire thing is just a nightmare. The migrants aren't stupid, they know this, they know that if people like your 1%er doctor friend can only get legal citizenship in 17 years, and doubtless after spending a great deal of money, there is no hope for ordinary folks like themselves. That is why they break the law. Not by and large because they are criminals with sinister intent. But because following the law offers them no hope.
Why do you want to talk to prepubescent children about romantic love and/or mating, collectivistjeff?
Download Form i-589, Request for Asylum. The thing is available in English and badly mangled Spanish. Any who can understand it are disabused of illusions of getting asylum and welfare checks. Latin America is crippled by caudillo fascism which, like communism, criminalizes production and trade. Biden was the key actor in exporting economy-crushing prohibition southward. Yet fools imagine Biden is an invitation for illiterates to shuffle northward. In fact it means more Kleptocracy fascism, forfeitures and poverty.
He began the citizenship process in 1999. He was finally naturalized in 2016. High-earning medical professional, American wife, and citizen-born child Even so, it took 18 years. blockpost
Thousands of Lawsuits Have Been Filed Over Wait Times, Backlogs at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Which Will Certainly Increase the Wait Times, Backlogs at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
The US welcomes anyone with an engineering degree, and rolls out a red carpet for nuclear physicists. Semiliterate collectivists, not so much. But exporting a rising tide of asset-forfeiture collapses, banking panics and depressions sinks all boats, starting with the most rickety; hence the waves of pathetic refugees.
Bad for whom? The State Department Employees at embassies and here 'assisting' those in need of diplomatic services know the 'magic' that cuts through red tape, bureaucratic delays, etc, etc,
'Why don't you contact one of the law firms that specializes in working with us'?
Works every time. Visas you don't deserve. Cheating on your citizenship test - no problem.
Just to be sure the marks take the recommendations, people who deserve the services and properly apply are refused and given the runaround just for the sport of it.
This has been going on for many decades. Singapore is one of the few countries that makes any effort to keep the embassies honest.
Backlogs for legal immigrants is what happens when you flood the country with illegals.