Is South Florida's Housing Market Too Hot?
Zoning laws, a limited housing stock, and inflation have created a major housing shortage in the bubble-prone region.

These days, it's not just the weather that's hot in Miami. As South Florida becomes a hub for cryptocurrency investors and remote workers, housing costs in the area have soared.
Data from the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies show that prices in Miami-Dade County, home to Miami, Miami Beach, and other municipalities popular with new arrivals to the state, have returned to levels not seen since the mid-2000s housing boom, a period of intense real estate speculation in the region that forced millions into foreclosures in the aftermath of the Great Recession. Meanwhile, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Marcia Fudge declared in a recent visit to Miami that the city was the epicenter of the country's growing housing crisis.
While inflation, supply chain bottlenecks, and a renewed interest in South Florida real estate have recently added fuel to the fire, housing affordability has always plagued South Florida residents. "It's not a new issue," Anne Ray, the manager of the Shimberg Center's Florida Housing Data Clearinghouse, tells Reason. "The sharp increase in rents is definitely a recent trend, but the structural gap between wages and housing prices is not new."
Ray shared data showing that workers would need to make almost $30 an hour in order to rent a standard two-bedroom apartment in the Miami area without experiencing cost burdens. As of 2021, Miami's median hourly wage was $18.59, creating a situation where many residents are forced to spend upward of 50 percent of their incomes on housing alone. The conventional financial wisdom is that households should spend no more than 30 percent of their incomes on rent.
Already in 2019, some were sounding the alarm about Miami's rising housing prices. One study commissioned by the housing group Miami Houses for All in collaboration with city and county officials found that Miami was the third-most expensive metropolitan area in the entire country for housing costs. The same study found that over 50 percent of households in Miami were spending more than they could afford on rents and mortgage payments.
"By at least one metric, Miami has even exceeded Boston," Ray remarks, noting the irony that many remote workers and businesses have moved to South Florida in pursuit of the area's supposed lower costs of living.
These rising costs have also impacted other parts of the Miami metropolitan area. According to the South Florida Sun Sentinel, a preliminary study from Florida International University's Metropolitan Center found that just 8 percent of households in neighboring Broward County could afford to buy a home. It also found that median sale prices in Broward are nine times higher than median salaries; in a normal housing market, the ratio should be closer to 3–1.
Experts worry that these rising costs could have detrimental effects on South Florida's local economy, which relies heavily on lower-wage service jobs to support its massive hospitality and tourism industry. "Broward County's economic competitiveness, resilience and quality of life are at risk – [with] impacts on Leisure & Hospitality, Healthcare, and Retail sectors reliant on service sector workers along with major institutions – hospitals, public schools, colleges, and universities," the FIU study warns.
Back in April, Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava declared that housing affordability was now a crisis for the area, promising action. Both the federal government and local officials have begun to implement some changes. In June, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced a new Rental Assistance Demonstration program with Miami-Dade County Public Housing and Community Development to help revitalize and preserve low-income senior housing in the city.
However, even the federal government has acknowledged that government funding can't solve the problem. "There is only so much money the federal government has, and we have given through the rescue package, the emergency rental assistance, incentives to landlords, we have done everything we can at this time," Fudge told CBS4 during her June visit to the city.
That's where market solutions come in. Several officials have proposed wide changes to local zoning laws, which have always been contested in the region, given the limited amount of land available for development. Levine Cava has proposed changes to zoning laws that would allow for greater density in unincorporated areas under the control of the county government. Meanwhile, County Commissioner Oliver Gilbert has proposed allowing greater density in areas near transit hubs. At minimum, the county estimates that these proposals would create thousands of new units, almost all of which would benefit lower- and middle-income renters.
For Levine Cava, the stakes are too high for inaction. "If people can't afford to live here, then, you know, there goes paradise," Levine Cava said at a recent housing summit that brought city and council officials together. "We have to come together as a community to solve this crisis."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We could always just deport new residents back to NY & CA.
Make leftists who move here uncomfortable.
By any means necessary.
Start now earning every week more than $7,000 to 8,000 by doing very simple and easy home based job online. Last month i have made $32,735 by doing this online job just in my part time for only 2 hrs. a day using my laptop. (res-12) This job is just awesome and easy to do in part time. Start earning more dollars online just by follow:-
.
instructions here:☛☛☛ https://yourjobs85.blogspot.com/
New Florida residence tax? California is still trying to tax ex Californians income tax. If they size it right they can make moving from California to Florida cost 100% of your income.
"There is only so much money the federal government has,"
Say, what? But I thought there was a money tree in Washington.
And money trees should really grow well in the sub-tropical Florida climate. Looks like President Trump has failed us again.
"There is only so much money the federal government has,"
Yeah, where's this lady been? What she really means is her department doesn't have enough money to do what she wants and she needs MORE. "we have done everything we can at this time," We can do MORE if you Gimme More.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (phy-11) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
No mention of the new high speed train?
With the advent of Brightline, lower income workers could live in Fort Lauderdale or even West Palm Beach.
getting from the Brightline hub out to the place of employment is going to be a problem as mass transit in Miami doesn’t really exist.
Quit messing with the price signals and this sorts itself out quickly.
And yet somehow tenants and landlords seem to voluntarily come to terms. Perhaps your nannyism is not needed.
If you want to rail against idiotic government meddling and intrusion, great! But you can say so directly, in terms of liberty; pandering to the whining equity classes is counter-productive for a libertarian web site.
Case in point:
Duh, that's what markets are, strangers working together, unknowingly, invisibly, solving government failures. Gosh, ya know .... if people couldn't afford to live there, they wouldn't. Or to put it more simply, if people do live there, they quite obviously can afford to live there. QED!
~15 years ago there were articles about a new condo tower in Miami with only 1 tenant.
"Ray shared data showing that workers would need to make almost $30 an hour in order to rent a standard two-bedroom apartment in the Miami area without experiencing cost burdens."
So fucking what? What do they have to earn in Aspen or Monaco?
Show me in the Constitution wear is says that people have the right to live anyplace they want with any income level, including zero.
Further, I'm guessing a "cost burden" is one of those lefty 'invented' terms which, on examination, prove to say not much of anything.
"Food insecurity"
"Food desert"
"Living wage"
And plenty more, all whining 'gimme more free shit'!
Somebody has to clean the floors and wait tables and deliver the mail.
The error is in targeting new housing to low income markets. By doing this, government ensures failure.
They should allow all the high-end high density housing that developers want to build. This would incentivise those with cash currently living in overpriced low end housing to move up. If enough new stuff comes online, the bottom end actually gets better. The very low end crap falls out of the market and gets bulldozed to make new high end stuff.
This is the cycle government works so hard to prevent. They want to preserve existing housing prices and keep low end neighborhoods intact. By doing so, they ensure shortages and bubbles.
They should allow all the high-end high density housing that developers want to build. This would incentivise those with cash currently living in overpriced low end housing to move up. If enough new stuff comes online, the bottom end actually gets better.
I'm not seeing how this is supposed to work. It also runs contrary to my experience. An area I lived in for almost 15 years was growing fairly rapidly. But every new apartment complex that went up in that time was for "luxury" apartments with rents well above what I was paying (and there were many such projects with no limitations on developers). What happened to my rent? Each year, it went up by several percent, because that is what the market could bear. But as should be obvious, that is faster than wages grew.
The very low end crap falls out of the market and gets bulldozed to make new high end stuff.
So, really, how is this going to help people with lower incomes, when the homes and apartments that they rent (because they can't afford to buy) are bulldozed to make more units even further beyond their price range?
The CWP of America is very loudly attempting to exploit this situation. They have a tough market with Miami Cubans, but they are pushing hard for rent controls, banning single family homes, more rail, etc.
Seems like Reason authors don't want to acknowledge the role of investors in driving up home and rent prices. I suppose the wonders of the free market will help all that wealth trickle down to everyone else, eventually.
I would absolutely not be able to work in a real estate agency in a hot Miami. In my opinion, this market is just full of sharks there. However, it is possible to develop in this direction, especially by getting good leads in the referral network. I advise you to read about how to get real estate leads, as this significantly solves the issue.