Biden Issues Executive Order Designed To Protect Abortion Access
The abortion wars have entered a new phase.

In remarks from the White House today, President Joe Biden laid out a new executive order "protecting access to reproductive health care services."
Flanked by Vice President Kamala Harris and Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, Biden addressed Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court's recent decision overturning Roe v. Wade, which had guaranteed abortion access nationwide for nearly five decades. Biden declared that Dobbs was "not a decision driven by the Constitution [or] by history" but "an exercise in raw political power."
Biden's executive order intends to "protect and expand access" to services that may no longer be constitutionally guaranteed. It instructs the Department of Health and Human Services to ensure that patients have access to contraceptives and abortifacient drugs, as well as safeguarding patient data which some fear could be abused by law enforcement in abortion-banning states. He also called on the Department of Justice, "much like they did in the civil rights era, to do everything in their power to protect these women seeking to invoke their rights."
For weeks, the White House has faced activist pressure to codify abortion rights into law. Biden's order came two weeks after the Dobbs decision, but two months after a draft of the decision was leaked. In June, Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D–Mich.) told Politico, "We knew this was coming and, nationally, didn't have a plan….The other side for 50 years has had a legal strategy—where is our 50-year strategy?"
But there is only so much that Biden can do by himself, especially by executive order alone.
Biden encouraged people to vote, saying that Democrats would need "two additional pro-choice senators and a pro-choice House" to codify abortion protections. His numbers seem off: In May, Senate Democrats failed to pass a national abortion law by even a majority vote, much less the 60 votes needed to avoid a filibuster. Biden said today that if Republicans were to pass a national abortion ban, "As long as I'm president, it won't happen. I'll veto it." But he won't be president forever.
For the most part, the Dobbs decision has made abortion a state-by-state issue. And in the two weeks since the decision was issued, several states have rushed to enshrine abortion protections into law, to counter other states' laws limiting the practice. Some private companies have offered to reimburse employees who have to travel out-of-state to seek abortion services, while some politicians have suggested punishing those companies for doing so.
The abortion wars clearly did not end with the Dobbs decision. Instead, they have entered an entirely new phase.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
For weeks, the White House has faced activist pressure to codify abortion rights into law.
Wait what? Wouldn't a better, more effective use of activists' time and effort be to focus pressure on Congress, which currently holds a Democratic majority? You know, the body that passes laws?
Perhaps some of Joe Lancaster's time could be spent thinking before typing.
I've seen no evidence your proposal is actually possible.
I concur.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (phy-08) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://getjobs49.tk
“Biden declared that Dobbs was "not a decision driven by the Constitution [or] by history" but "an exercise in raw political power."”
The hypocrisy.
“Biden encouraged people to vote, saying that Democrats would need "two additional pro-choice senators and a pro-choice House" to codify abortion protections.“
I dunno, maybe Lancaster is just doing honest reporting. Maybe activists HAVE been after the Biden admin. Given progressives' penchant for an imperial presidency and general disdain for the democratic process, that's entirely possible. I just thought that combination of words and syllables were weird. Pressuring the Executive for... a 'law'.
If the Democrats push through strong pro-abortion legislation, they will lose Congress--at least the House--bigger than they're set up to lose it now. The DNC probably directed the activists to lay off Democrat legislators becuase of this.
Go for it!
I come down on the side of honest reporting. I remember his first article. A number of us commented it was refreshing to read something not written by a progtard Kool-Aid drinker.
Cut the kid a little break. 🙂
Hahahahaha! If sockpuppets could bet on their superstition, I'd gladly fade them into the poorhouse.
Joe Lancaster not much brighter than Joe Scranton.
Or, as this does not seem to involve commerce among the several states or with the Indian tribes, on their state legislators?
Hey, if Congress does not pass the desired laws (damn that stupid law about both House and Senate approval), then social justice requires the President to pass laws. And if the Constitution does not say that, then fuck Thomas Jefferson or something.
TDS-induced brain damage at REASON. Not pretty.
"Civil rights"? The civil rights fights in the 1960's were about enforcing amendments (13th and 14th) to the Constitution. Pass an amendment legalizing abortion Corn Pop.
And for the Nick Reason Crowd...your obsession with abortion in lieu of say the Fed and foreign wars and "group rights" madness is so telling. As libertarians we believe in decentralization of policy issues (no sorry, abortion till birth might be your perception of a "right" but it isn't law anywhere in the Bill of Rights, so it falls to the 10th Amendment).
Reason loves to get all worked up about some local govt doing something stupid but the big liberty issues it like CATO strikes out. Maybe stop getting all worked up about the need to send "gender affirming therapists into elementary schools"...
As long as the Filibuster remains in effect, Congress will pass no law not approved by the evangelical base or the exman. Remember it was the Republicans in Congress who gave us this political court, which has no philosophy (the states have the power, except when they don't) other than pleasing their GOP masters.
Now would be a good time to vote some teeth into the 19th Amendment. That was the one that--with a boost from Pauline Sabin--yanked the teeth out of the Prohibition Amendment.
They would, because just like the democrats the republicans agree that rights, bans, prohibitions can be created as easily as passing a law, or even an agency passing a regulation. Between the two of them we're no longer a republic, we're a dictatorship and congress is a dictator via bureaucracy. There's the right way and the easy way, and regardless of party both sides have decided the right way is not necessary. We'll never need another constitutional amendment, it can all be done by passing a law now.
So we should give up on ever getting Communist Manifesto plank 2 out of the Constitution, 16th Amendment, bathwater and all?
Maybe the activists know there is little chance of anything like that happening before the midterms and are pressuring Brandon to rule by Executive Fiat. He just did that, somewhat with his signature "look at me doing something that will actually do nothing new but is a great photo op" governance style Executive Order. Essentially, it directs federal agencies to continue doing what they are doing.
They haven't done it over 50 years when they had the opportunity. The aspect is 2 fold.
The legal issue - In 73 it was unconstitutional when the Feds gave themselves the Power & took it from the People within the confines of their state. The constitution NEVER entitle abotion as a right.
The Moral Issue - of course life as even acknowledged by scientist confirm - Human life begins at conception. It was never intended to ne a method of birth control. This illegitimate President is more a Tyrant than any Chinese/Russian desot. They simply lost but by the way - Most Americans abhor abortion and all SCOTUS did was give the People & their states to decide & rightly so
Diane, it is NOT a "democratic" it is DEMOCRAT. We need to assure that we use the correct words when dealing with the left. Democrats are member of a party.
The bigger issue is that NO PRESIDENT has authority to write law, nor to FUND anything at all. That is Congress' job.
This is exactly the type of government interference that this gay and Black man who is GOP Proud like Milo and Caitlin opposes. Imagine the nerve of Biden interfering in the lives of the GOP church ladies who in turn want to interfere in the lives of everyone else. Oh well, thank God (!!!) we have the libertarian alliance of Kavanaugh, Alito, and Comey-Barrett to defend the principles of limited government from Biden’s Leninist cadres. Remember libertarianism means federalism— except in the obvious case of gun ownership where it does not.
Two words: Second Amendment. Troll. OK, that's three words.
See, and raise you a 13a and 19A, Trump-sukkah!
"who in turn want to interfere in the lives of everyone else."
Imagine getting in the way of murderers, those busybodies.
Imagine someone so dense that they are outraged that SCOTUS just told legislators to do their jobs because the courts are not going to rule by fiat anymore. Now the people in the states can elect their own legislators to make the law they want. Devolving the power back to the states is called something...uhh..oh, yeah. Federalism.
Strange how all the leftists and Progressives screeching about Democracy these last several years are suddenly afraid of it and want an all powerful nanny state to tell everyone what to do.
Dere ya go! Bring back that Fugitive Slave Law!
Sorry, it was never a constitutional right and SCOTUS made right the error of 73. This illegitimate administration. He never stoof a chance. The Media created the propagandist illusion that he ever had a chance. No, there is massive election fraud evodence being suppressed and never heard in a court of law. Only deranged small portion who laps up the propaganda being spread for years. Watch 2000 mules by Dinesh De Souza. This is only small potatoes and the only people that deny cell phone tracking data is outting their selves as co conspirators. We've sentenced many to prison. This is how your data is tracked by Big Tech. Their assumptions can easily be debunked. Biden is a LWO puppet. We know it & the truth is everywhere
Error? Protecting individual women from enslavement by religious bigots was the best plank in the Original Libertarian Platform. The Suprema recognized this and copied the LP plank into its Roe v Wade decision. Immediately the Prohibition Party began organizing lard-layered telegangelists to shriek together a lynch mob. Army of God snipers murdered actual individuals, physicians, directly and strove to export ignorant superstition to vassal-states... the ones from which starveling populations are fleeing into Texas.
Oh Joe, say it ain't so! You left out the best part!
Sleepy Joe reads the teleprompter instructions.
I love this presidency. The problem is that I don't expect any candidate to actually maintain a compilation of these to bust out when it's time to run against him and point out how little he's actually doing.
"He said, 'let me repeat that line," but then...didn't repeat it. Because it was a teleprompter instruction. And he's barely functional. He's like my elderly uncle who can manage certain things, can hold on a conversation, but forgets the rules to card games he's played his whole life.
Slowed video shows he never said "let me." That is his communications team trying to bury the story.
Who you gonna believe? Your own lying ears or Official US Propaganda?
This is why the Disinformation Governing Cabal is necessary.
Too lazy to look it up, but isn't altering an official transcript illegal?
Or is it one of those 'illegal border crossing' level things?
and is now obsessed with smelling children's hair
End quote. Repeat the line.
A pen and a phone and a teleprompter.
But waning skills to use any of these.
OMGA (Oh My Government Almighty), here's another opportunity for me to share my opinion about abortions!!!
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but I am afraid that if I did that, I would change SOOOOO many data-driven minds, we'd have a revolution on our hands!
Soooo... I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
My inputs have been aborted! But don't think about THAT, if it upsets you too much! Think of them as NOT having been fartilized!!!
Democrats 150 continuous years of openly racist tradition.
What? They’ve changed you say?
Biden: 'If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black' 22-May-2020
President Biden pledged on the campaign trail — and, with Justice Stephen G. Breyer’s pending retirement, recently confirmed — that he would choose “the first Black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court.” WaPo 25-Feb-2022
The legacy lives on.
Only racists give a flying fuck about race.
G. Waffen Bush used faith-based bureaucracy packing to weaponize the asset-forfeiture laws that turned essentially all police forces into armed robbers. Enough homes were confiscated over a roach in the ashtray to make mortgage-backed securities and their derivatives worthless and bring a liquidity crisis as savings vacuumed out of fractional-reserve banks. The redneck National Socialist economy came crashing down, the Tiger Woods guy got a landslide and re-election, and youse blinking Trumpistas still don't get it. Good.
Finally. An executive order reason can get behind. No discussion of where he finds this power or anything. Not in ACA or other bills.
A transparent publicity stunt Reason considers worthy of an actual media response. There's a sucker born every minute.
Abortions are not against any federal law, but this order makes them even less against any federal law.
Abortions are against federal law, if performed on a federal military base. Female soldiers (etc.) will have to stock up on coat hangers, if stationed in a red state!
Nearly one in five women ages 18-44 years in the military was pregnant during 2005, more than the rate among civilian women [12]. The proportion of pregnancies that were unintended among women in the military, 54%, greatly exceeds the HP2010 goal of 30%.
https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/pubs/journals/j.contraception.2011.01.017.pdf
If the enemy doesn't get them killed, the coat-hangers will!
I suppose it’s just too much to ask for our brave and highly trained fighting women to avail themselves of that free birth control they are provided by myself a day taxpayer or, failing that, to keep their pants on
Our fighting women AND men, also, both, SHOULD be responsible enough to brush their teeth thoroughly, and NOT eat too much sugar! Then WHY are we taxpayers paying for these SINNERS to get their dental cavities getting removed?!?! Especially those of us taxpayers with irrefutable religious beliefs about the inalienable rights of cavity-dwelling dental decay-causing bacteria?
HOW DARE you, Plucky Squirrel, point to the equivocation, superstition and special pleading of God's Own Prohibitionists? Shame shame shame shame shame!
But... But... But Zeus told me to do it!
Hoes gonna hoe.
Why should my tax dollars fund abortions on a military base for military personnel, O great libertarian mind?
There shouldn't be any wars at all! If no one practiced unprovoked aggression (per libertarian ethos), there wouldn't be any! NO military would be needed!
Since we live in the real world, we have to deal with healthy young folks in the military... Hello, you want your fighting folks be 60-years-olds and older?!?! Young folks are horny and lonely, on remote bases! Hello?!?!? And SOME of them are NOT totally brilliant! So they need fall-back birth control!
I could say more, but SOME minds are already TOTALLY closed, so I bet I am wasting my time! If by ANY small chance you have an open mind, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/#_Toc107315509 for MANY reasons why we (including military folks) need abortion as a necessary evil.
You make a great case for women getting Norplant during the time of military service. BTW, numbnuts, you can leave a military base. You can take leave and go elsewhere for a few days.
I forgot to mention that it became such a problem in my daughters unit for the women to get pregnant and avoid deployment that the commanding officer had to institute a policy of separation from service for any female becoming pregnant after deployment was announced. Oddly, the rate dropped to almost zero. There are quite a number of females that joined to use Uncle Sugar to pay all expenses and had no intention of defending our country just increasing the welfare
Unintended? Women in the military? Can you say "free pass home from extended deployment"? "Unintended" pregnanvies skyrocket during long overseas deployment. Guess who cant get sent home from overseas deployment. If you said "non-birthing persons" you win a prize
This is quite true! VOLUNTARY abortions in cases like this could save the taxpayer money, though. They are not ALL intentional. Many are. I don't think that anyone knows WHAT the ratio is, and getting honest answers is impossible, in cases like this.
But yeah, you're correct!
Heck, we may even attract Canadian tourists again someday.
Biden is also the same guy that said the First Amendment is excessive. He is not a reliable narrator on anything involving the constitution.
Why doesn't the left go ahead and admit that killing babies is part of their religion? They could then demand to be able to sacrifice babies on the altar of the climate gods as a religion rite and thus their right under the First Amendment.
Dude! Don't give them any ideas!
Explains why so many “talking points” (including at Reason) include the term “enshrining abortion rights”.
Very telling that the Left considers aborting unborn babies a sacred right. How delighted Margret Sanger and her fellow eugenics filth would be with our boy Brandon.
Hey, didn't Joe used to date Sanger?
He sniffed her hair when she was a kid.
Yep it entered a brand new phase that we have never been in this situation before! Remember us history began in 1973
"But there is only so much that Biden can do by himself, especially by executive order alone."
Challenge accepted.
"For weeks, the White House has faced activist pressure to codify abortion rights into law."
++++++++
I admit, I'm getting old. However, I seem to remember from my civics classes (and school house rock) that there is a process for an issue to go through to become a bill "codified" into law. And, it didn't involve activists telling a President to make it happen by decree or they would hold their breath and stomp their feet while shaking their ugly, fat, naked bodies for all to see.
That’s the new woke edition of School House Rock.
I'm not sure if there's a federal authority sufficient to force states to legalize abortions, just like I don't think there's any federal authority to ban it, if Republicans tried. You'd have to write and ratify an amendment to address this issue because it's otherwise a state issue.
It’s funny that the geriatric clown references Republicans federally banning abortion, WHEN THEY LITERALLY JUST DEEMED IT A 10TH AMENDMENT ISSUE.
I really want the feds to try to force states to do so. I've been waiting for Abbott to invoke the "invasion" requirement to enforce the border, but still no dice. I've been waiting for any conservative governor to deny federal agents access to anyone under subpoena from the illegal Jan 6 House committee, but so far, no. We need a state to step up and say no, with force.
It's gonna be hard to justify acting as if it's an "invasion", when the president has invited all the invaders.
Whenever one of these invaders is asked, that's what they say; "Joe Biden said we should come".
As is the case with all things, definitions evolve over time. For instance; as little as two years ago the definition of the word woman was non controversial. These days "codified" can mean whatever a Reason assistant editor wants it to mean.
Nope. The 19th Amendment sought to suffice--especially if Republicans without Greene teeth vote for the Anschluss party. Women voters have avoided the LP since 1980 anyway. Mid-terms could replay the spat alienating Teedy Rosenfeld from his portly pal Taft. Picture the irony if the Anschluss Caucus were to serve a useful purpose after all!
Biden once again completely ignoring the law-making process while claiming to be a defender of democracy?
Well, I never!
Democracy means only what the Democrats support, no matter how it's codified. Actually voting your conscience on legislation or the courts ruling on constitutionality, unless it benefits Democrats, is so totalitarian. Anything that opposes the Democrats platform is literal fascism. Don't you even speak leftist. See the hoopla over the USSC decision on South Carolina v EPA.
“For weeks, the White House has faced activist pressure to codify abortion rights into law. Biden's order came two weeks after the Dobbs decision, but two months after a draft of the decision was leaked. In June, Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D–Mich.) told Politico, "We knew this was coming and, nationally, didn't have a plan….The other side for 50 years has had a legal strategy—where is our 50-year strategy?" Pressure the White House to codify something into law? Apparently the 50 year strategy was to rely on those branches of government not designed to codify things into law. Of course, a cowardly Congress encourages that sort of mishegas.
I prefer a flanking strategy against babies, personally. Suppressing fire from a fixed element while you send a second element to flank. They never see it coming.
Fuck that, suppressive fire while you call in artillery and CAS. Fucking BRRRRT.
“You can’t [legislate] by executive order unless you’re a dictator. We’re a democracy. We need consensus.” —Joe Biden, October, 2020.
Pen and phone. And teleprompter. Unless it misfires.
"We need a pen and a phone. The sacred right to abortion must be protected! Look up from teleprompter. Pause and take a breath. I promise, as your president, I'll protect women's health! Turn to the right then walk off stage!"
The LP used to have a 50 year strategy. Then along came the anarcho-commie infiltrators, followed by the anarcho-fascist infiltrators to throw us off the Fisher-Pry replacement curve and cut off our law-changing spoiler vote growth. Restoring the original LP platform could thwart both kinds of Trojan horse trash.
What an ass. The same guy proposed a vaccine mandate for every employer with at least 100 employees. He's no protector if bodily autonomy. If you say you are pro-choice, be pro-choice, not just pro-abortion.
Ha! You'll never get hired as a campaign consultant with crazy ideas like that.
Oh! Is that nasty old 19th Amendment about to kick sand in the poor girl-bulliers' face?
The Lawyer job protection act of 2022
Legal Insurrection had a nice title for their article on this signing event: "‘Devout Catholic’ Biden Signs Executive Order to Protect Abortion Access"
A commenter also had a pretty nice take: "I’m surprised the Pope didn’t come and give him communion while he was signing it."
One socialist covering for another.
You wouldn't understand. It's a one-world domination thing.
Don't just stand there bobby... strike him down with Old Testament Army of God lightning!
Typical useless virtue signaling EO from Brandon.
Yeah, the net practical result of this is..........nothing.
When droolin' Joe's activities have an effect, we get Afghanistan, so we're fortunate this is so much posturing.
Come on! The optics of military transports flying out of Austin's airport, including blue-haired womyn clinging to the wheels, would be priceless.
What's the problem with birth control methods like the IUD? Show be cheap, readily available and not controversial for any reason I am aware of.
How do state laws apply to military people who are ordered to go to whatever state they are in?
Is it possible to discuss these things without a verbal firestorm?
Does the constitution confer a right to an IUD, arrived at through valid reasoning, preferably via the 9th or 14th amendments? Please ask the correct question.
All we're asking for is common sense IUD control, like background checks and hot/crazy score.
The problem is that birth control suggests some kind of maturity and personal responsibility. The current progressive narrative rejects those.
Also, we might assume too much if we think that politicians and the media want to "solve" abortion.
Anthony Comstock, God's anointed Savior, has declared all birth control the moral equivalent of race suicide. Teedy Rosenfeld agreed, that settled it. "We" must attack Canada with nuclear weapons to show those baby-killing heathens how much Jesus loves fertilized aiggs. Enslavable 13th Amendment radical feminists are escaping across that border, leaping from ide-floe to ice-floe! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLToWNAaEF8
Another article to show how much REASON is on board the baby-killing train.
is it baby-killing when the killed are mostly future democrats? why are you on the GOP- irrelevance train?
On a speech to announce this, Biden was reading stage directions off the teleprompter.
https://twitter.com/TimRunsHisMouth/status/1545459586433417218?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1545459586433417218%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fmedia%2Felon-musk-twitter-users-mock-biden-reading-end-quote-from-teleprompter-during-live-address
Nope, no libertarians here. All GOP/MAGA creeps, happy to limit rights they don't agree with and stick their nose in other people's business backed up by the state.
Support for Roe v. Wade is overwhelming among Democrats and independents: 88 percent and 76 percent, respectively. But even a majority of Republicans — 52 percent — don’t want to see the court ruling overturned.
The Tea-totalitarian Trumpanzee Anschluss has just done away with the opportunity to vote FOR individual rights AND AGAINST both Kleptocracy factions. Girl-bullying, asset-forfeiture fascists have dug themselves a Gee-Oh-Pee urinalysis grave. Sending involuntary servitude slavers to body-snatch a harder, angrier, more superstitious and hateful Republican party means principled voters can safely abstain or cheer the Dems. The alternative is another Christian National Socialist Crash and Great Depression.
Biden's executive order does little that is meaningful. There is little that he can do.
Now Biden's inflation hits Medal of Freedom nominations, as so many are awarded the news stories barely list them all, or explain why they won:
https://www.npr.org/2022/07/07/1110258885/biden-awards-medal-of-freedom-to-denzel-washington-simone-biles-john-mccain
Full list of 17 winners:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/07/01/president-biden-announces-recipients-of-the-presidential-medal-of-freedom/
All those women have to do is vote! Picture a Congress emptied of pulpit-thumping redneck evangelizers and their repulsive harridans...
Next Up; Pro-Life President issues an Executive Order to the FDA banning all abortion access NATIONALLY including birth control pills, day-after pills, etc, etc, etc..
Because; The good old P.O.S. [WE] Power-Mad Pro-Life mob just HAD to throw the Gov-Guns into everyone's PERSONAL life... F'En idiots...... LIMITED government???? What a joke... Bunch of hypocritical fools.
So the President is openly undermining the authority of the judiciary, and Lancaster has no comment on that whatever his opinion on the issue. Suggests that Congress has authority to set abortion policy for the entire country, despite the Dobbs decision suggesting it comes under the states' 10th amendment authority.
Reason writers can really throw out all adherence to the separation of powers and checks and balances when they have a personal interest in an issue and are not getting their pony.
As-if the 'feds' didn't have a running record of usurping all the Power.
Anyone with half a brain knew this would happen. If the judiciary doesn't uphold Individual Liberty it always ends up somehow in federal hands. But Power-Mad hypocrites couldn't just leave it alone.
Democrats would have codified Abortion on demand with zero restrictions if they could have, but they never had a majority let alone enough to pass it as a law/
The majority is somewhere in between the two extreme positions that the corporate media attempts to define. If the country was trying to be enlightened like Western Europe that progressives often tout, there would be a ban after 15 weeks. There are outliers, but 15 weeks is close to the average.
To me I find returning the decision and many more decisions back to the state or even more local a good sign. What a community needs and desires in one locale will probably not fit perfectly in another locale.
Government should reflect the consensus of the people whom grant power to the government. Remember that we ultimately hold the power. The more local the more representative government will be. The more remote the less representative government will be.
We live in an age where our federal and state governments believe that they grant rights to the people and that the people should be content with what the government provides. The reality is that government is nothing without what the people give to the government.
Rome was not built in a day and dismantling our corrupt governments will take time and occur incrementally. Pushing decisions from the federal level to the state level is the first baby step.
Ya; Spread that B.S. propaganda... Obviously State Gov-Guns should be planning everyone's pregnancy and certainly not the family/person who is pregnant. /s
That decision was reached almost seventy years ago.