Arizona's New Law Funds Students, Not Just Government-Run Schools
Arizona's new law should make alternative school arrangements more accessible than ever to families interested in educating their kids instead of funding bureaucracies.

It's good to watch your state lose its lead as a school choice innovator not because it's backsliding, but because other states are making it easier for families to pick education options for their kids. It's even better when your state reclaims the lead through increased freedom. Last week, my state of Arizona did just that with the passage of a law expanding the use of education savings accounts (ESA) that let education funding follow students to their families' preferred learning environments rather than locking them into one-size-fits-some government institutions.
Once favored by officials across party lines, educational freedom has, in recent years, become a partisan issue mostly supported by Republicans and opposed by Democrats (with commendable exceptions such as Gov. Jared Polis (D–Colo.) a champion of charter schools, and other less impressive ones such as the GOP lawmakers who blocked choice in Iowa). That was the case last week when HB 2853 passed on a party-line vote. It was guaranteed Republican Gov. Doug Ducey's support given that he not only called for school choice legislation in January, but boasted at the close of the legislative term that "we enacted the most expansive school choice legislation in the nation."
First introduced in Arizona in 2011, Empowerment Scholarship Accounts, as ESAs are called in the state, let parents receive 90 percent of state per-student base spending to be deposited into savings accounts to be used for educational expenses such as tuition, learning therapies, and tutoring (actual awards average about $6,400 per child, excluding extra funding for special-needs children which more than doubles the amount). Until this new legislation, qualified students included those with disabilities, in failing public schools, wards of the court, children of active-duty military members, residents of Indian reservations, and other categories. EdChoice, an education-policy organization, estimates that 23 percent of students in the state currently qualify for the program. The new law drops most qualification requirements for participation in the program.
Last week's successful vote "Expands eligibility for the Empowerment Scholarship Account (ESA) program to every family in Arizona," comments Arizona's Goldwater Institute, which advocated for passage. "Families would receive over $6,500 per year per child for private school, homeschooling, 'learning pods,' tutoring, or any other kinds of educational service that would best fit their students' needs."
Notably, participation in the program is now open to any state resident eligible to enroll in kindergarten through 12th grade in Arizona's public schools. That means that tax money earmarked for education use in the state is no longer tied to brick-and-mortar buildings run by government bureaucrats. The money can follow students to where they learn best.
"Last year, West Virginia wrested the 'most expansive ESA' title away from Arizona with the enactment of its Hope Scholarship policy, which provides ESAs to all students either switching out of a public school or entering kindergarten," writes Jason Bedrick, a research fellow with The Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy. "Once Ducey, a Republican, signs the ESA expansion into law, Arizona will regain its 'most expansive ESA' distinction, because the accounts will be available to all students, regardless of what type of school they had been attending."
Historically, school choice has been available to wealthier families and those willing to make sacrifices in order to afford tuition or homeschool their kids even as they pay taxes to support government institutions that don't work for them. ESAs are one way of extending choice to families that have more limited resources so that they aren't stuck with the reading-and-writing equivalent of the Department of Motor Vehicles.
"The average ESA award covers 100% of the median private elementary school tuition and fee rate in Arizona, putting private education within financial reach of even the most economically disadvantaged," the Goldwater Institute concluded when it reviewed the program in 2019. "The 10 districts where ESAs are most popular in Arizona are overwhelmingly socioeconomically disadvantaged. The three districts with the highest concentrations of ESA students have child poverty rates more than double the state average."
Making education options available to families so they can pick what's right for their children is obviously popular with families, and it's also effective at improving outcomes.
"The country's largest private school choice program, which enrolls largely low-income students from low-income schools, has a positive effect on college-going and graduation rates," the Urban Institute found in 2019 when it examined Florida's Tax Credit Scholarship Program.
Education freedom promises not just better academic outcomes, but the potential for social peace. After years of continuing battles over racialized lessons, pandemic policy, politicized curricula, and gender norms, ESAs and other means of enhancing choice offer a simple solution: "You educate your kids your way, and I'll educate my kids my way." It's an elegant fix that should raise objections only from those who insist on controlling other people's children.
Arizona has been down this path before, it should be noted. A similar proposal was beat back in 2018 by a confusingly framed ballot measure pushed by enemies of education freedom, despite polling indicating plurality support for choice. The same groups promise to again try to block the extension of choice to Arizona's families.
But the last vote took place at the height of the #RedForEd movement, when teachers unions peddled the idea that shoveling money to their members was the way to support education. Since then, government-run schools bungled the challenge of teaching kids during the COVID-19 pandemic and teachers unions and their allies treated parents with contempt. Many families have had it with public schools and their self-serving bureaucracies. Now, political scuffles over expanded education freedom take place in an environment in which unions burned their credibility and many more families have explored and become comfortable with homes-based education, private schools, microschooling, charters, and other alternatives to the old default.
"The global COVID-19 pandemic has sparked new interest in homeschooling and the appeal of alternative school arrangements has suddenly exploded," the Census Bureau noted last year.
Arizona's new law should make alternative school arrangements more accessible than ever to families interested in educating their kids instead of funding bureaucracies. Other states would be well-advised to follow suit.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I thought this was a Gillespie article, since it went out of the way to headpat Jared Polis despite him being entirely irrelevant to the story.
What is with this publication's obsession with Polis?
Well he is a progressive,, so reason feels compelled to support him, as this is a progressive publication
The media narrative has declared him the most libertarian leftist, so they have to push him hard. Despite all of his bad actions.
The Biden administration is unsalvageable, so Polis is the potential replacement in 2024. They need to fluff him as much as possible.
Just like DeSantis is the most likely GOP nominee, and they have to demonize him as much as possible.
The only bad thing about this expansion is the communist protest group Red for Ed is going to expand as well. Such fucking annoying and ignorant protestors.
These ESAs can also be used for home schooling. It isnt just tied to school scholarships.
Agreed. A more sanctimonious gang of Karens and helicopter moms you have never met.
Yeah, that shit was horrible. I moved right when that movement really caught hold, but read about it a bit. I'm so glad their tax law change got struck down by the courts as well. That was absurd and would have hurt the state so much.
ESAs and other means of enhancing choice offer a simple solution: "You educate your kids your way, and I'll educate my kids my way." It's an elegant fix that should raise objections only from those who insist on controlling other people's children.
This is absolutely terrific. I am fully supportive of this idea, with one single caveat: the education that each kid receives must be a genuine education. There has to be some minimal standard that all educational institutions are held to. This is generally enforced through accreditation requirements, which often is run by the state but doesn't necessarily have to be. (Universities after all are accredited by commissions that are not state-run.) Students should not graduate without knowing how to read and write and do basic tasks, for example. But also, students should not graduate ONLY knowing how to read and write and do basic tasks. The ultimate objective of education ought to be to prepare students to be future productive, well-informed, critical thinking citizens and I would hope any well considered accreditation scheme would adopt this basic vision.
Jeff's for educational freedom, as long as it's within state-approved parameters.
Didn't you just say EVERY parent wants what is best for their kids? Do you think they would send them to a school that would not provide them with a 'genuine education". I mean, it would be a shame if they missed out on the mastery of doublethink you so adpetly display here. A clear indication you attended the government school and met all its minimal standards.
There has to be some minimal standard that all educational institutions are held to.
You're in luck because there is! That standard is enforced by the parents!
So you can relax now.
Is this a "should be accredited" in that you think accreditation is useful, or is this a "must be accredited" in that you think parents should not be able to choose unaccredited schools?
"Students should not graduate without knowing how to read and write and do basic tasks, for example."
Why do you so blatantly condemn the Chicago Public School system and the public school system in every Democrat controlled shithole. Don't be coy, go ahead and state your racial objections plainly.
All this winning is wearing me out. It's nonstop.
Worst. Law. Ever.
Worst than the fugative slave act?
Yeah cause government monopoly, one size fits no one schools are such huge successes in providing education with the huge per pupil funding they receive.
worse than the 16th amendment?
Worse than the 20th Amendment?
Welcome to the revolution.
I think this is a really good move and I'm excited to see how this develops over the next decade or so. I think philosophically this is solid, and I have high hopes for the practical outcomes that may come from this. It will take time though, and so I hope people don't freak out too quickly when things don't improve immediately.
I fully expect to see articles in about 2 months about how the law was passed and things aren't better and that means the law was shit though.
when things don't improve immediately.
For the parents, things will improve immediately.
Fair enough. I meant more that they will find some metric that didn't improve and claim it's evidence that this move was useless.
School choice is great. But these laws are also pretty toothless as long as the government has its fingers in education. See Jeff, above, on accreditation. That's still an opening for the government to dictate the terms of educational choice.
They are worried because they have had totalitarian control over education for decades. If kids become educated, the dems indoctrination camps will loose conscripts
"thus allowing an observation to be made that certain groups of people underperform relative to others --- consistently, across all economic backgrounds."
Exactly this. The two biggest fears are first and foremost, losing their indoctrination monopoly, and also statistical evidence that despite socioeconomic status playing a huge role in a child's educational track, that when controlled for race and socioeconomic status schools that spend their time teaching kids to actually read, and do appropriate level math will outperform schools that spend their time pushing activist left wing propaganda such as privilege, oppression, pronoun garbage, and how terrible America is.
When the choice starts to become "do I want what will make my kid objectively better prepared for life, or what will make me look like a more woke parent/ally" a lot of folks are going to be faced with a tough choice. And watch how fast these white savior types flee to the better schools in droves.
thus allowing an observation to be made that certain groups of people underperform relative to others --- consistently, across all economic backgrounds.
Which "certain groups" are you referring to? Redheads? Left-handed people? People who like smooth jazz? Don't be coy, tell us what you really think.
do I want what will make my kid objectively better prepared for life
EVERY parent wants this. It is just a myth that there is some huge number of parents out there who don't care if their kids learn how to read, but who want them to know how to protest injustice.
The question is, what precisely constitutes "objectively better prepared for life"? In my view it must include learning basic skills AS WELL AS learning how to be a well-informed, well-prepared citizen. So it means learning math, but it also means learning art, literature, music, history, and yes controversial topics upon which future voters will be asked to offer an opinion.
Furthermore there is this thing called accreditation. In general schools cannot be accredited if they only offer a very very narrow curriculum. It does not matter if it is a highly STEM-focused education or a humanities-focused education. I am not sure what the accreditation process is like in Arizona, but there is presumably some minimal standard to which all schools must meet.
"...controversial topics upon which future voters will be asked to offer an opinion."
No it doesn't. If kids get a solid, classical education, they are able to learn about those things on their own. They don't need a teacher to tell them how to think about it.
I'm earning 85 dollars/h to complete some work on a home computer. I not at all believed that it can be possible but my close friend earning $25k only within four weeks simply doing this top task as well as she has satisfied me to join.
Check further details by reaching this link..>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
They are worried because they have had totalitarian control over education for decades. If kids become educated, the dems indoctrination camps will loose conscripts
This. The Communist knows that step one is to separate the children from the parents and indoctrinate them into the total state party.
^ this.
When it comes down to it these schools are de-emphasizing performance based metrics and advanced classes because black kids do worse. Lets cut the bullshit here. This is what is happening. Not only that, but as Cronut states, they are being given activist drivel and being told what it is to RightThink (TM). They arent given multiple sides of complex issues and seeing debate back and forth, they are being given packaged, dumbed down rhetoric from one activist side. The solution to this would be to cover the facts and teach the kids how to think.
As discussed in prior threads, the left has just pushed too far and the pendulum is going to swing back hard and far. They are doing terrible with Hispanics increasingly, and this school stuff is guaranteed to lose them more Asian support. Many Asians are happy to stay out of the woke fights and back&forth between the white/black (in reality, sane white vs woke white) issues so long as they get to continue on having great opportunities for their kids and families. Eliminating advanced math because its not fair that LaQuan cant be in that class is a surefire way to get them to vote R.
I might back up a step in that chain, though.
The Democrats are very heavily funded by Union money. Almost all union money goes entirely to the Ds and non-direct support as well.
This is about short term power as well. Keep the teacher's unions happy since government schools are a one-stop shop for their outsized influence, and the union keeps you in office. A lot of the long-term indoctrinational stuff is likely secondary to a typical politician looking at all that union largess putting them back in office for another term.
Because otherwise, who needs experts or elites?
They have to set the standards, after all. That's why he worships them.
Don't be coy, Chem, go ahead and label him a racist, nazi, white supremacist. Don't forget privileged, you have to hit all the talking points.
Let's not forget that both Bill Clinton and Barak Hussein Obama are left-handed. Very, very sinister.
single parent families, especially single mom families. These kids woefully underperform, across all races and economic classes.