3 Supreme Court Cases To Watch in the Next 2 Weeks
Big rulings are coming soon on school choice, guns, and abortion.

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2021–22 term is rapidly coming to a close. By the end of June, the Court is expected to release decisions in a number of high-profile cases that deal with some of the most important and contentious issues in American law and politics. Here are three big cases to watch out for in the weeks ahead.
1. Carson v. Makin
Both advocates and opponents of school choice are closely awaiting this one. At issue is whether Maine's tuition assistance program ran afoul of the Constitution by excluding private schools that offer "sectarian" education. Judging by the December 2021 oral arguments, during which Chief Justice John Roberts pressed Maine's chief deputy attorney general to explain why his state's approach should not be judged guilty of religious discrimination, the school choice side stands a good chance of emerging victorious.
2. New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
The Supreme Court has not ruled on the merits of a major Second Amendment case since 2010. But that will likely change this month. At issue here is the constitutionality of a state law requiring anyone seeking a license to carry a concealed handgun in public to first satisfy a local official that he has "proper cause" to do so. According to the state, a "generalized" wish to carry a concealed weapon for self-defense purposes is not sufficient to meet the proper cause standard. Judging by the November 2021 oral arguments, a majority of the Court appears poised to recognize at least some sort of limited Second Amendment right to carry a concealed gun for self-defense purposes outside of the home. It is also possible that the Court recognizes an even broader Second Amendment right to conceal carry. Either way, the oral arguments were promising for the gun rights side.
3. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
We already know what the "first draft" of this opinion looks like, thanks to the famous leak published by Politico. The question now is whether Justice Samuel Alito still has at least four other justices willing to join his draft opinion overruling Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the key precedents securing a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. Make no mistake, the Alito approach may still be the ultimate winner. But another possibility is that Chief Justice Roberts attracts enough votes for a narrower decision, one that upholds Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban (and thereby invites more such abortion bans in other states) while technically leaving Roe and Casey in place. Roberts seemed ready to endorse that approach during the December 2021 oral arguments. Either way, things do not look promising for the abortion rights side.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Way to light the Tony Signal.
I even have made $30,030 just in five weeks straightforwardly working part-time from my apartment. (res-32) Immediately when I've lost my last business, I was exhausted and luckily I found this top online task & with this I am in a position to obtain thousands directly through my home. Everybody is able to get this best career & can gain more dollars on-line going
this article... https://www.profit97.com/
I even have made $30,030 just in five weeks straightforwardly working part-time from my apartment. (keb_23) Immediately when I've lost my last business, I was exhausted and luckily I found this top online task & with this I am in a position to obtain thousands directly through my home. Everybody is able to get this best career &
can gain more dollars online going this article.......... http://getjobs49.tk
Thank god for Trump, for the judges alone.
^
I agree - as tumultuous as those years were - the movement of the court back to a more literal and original intent reading will have been worth it...
I won't support him again though - DeSantis 2024!
>>But another possibility is that Chief Justice Roberts attracts enough votes for a narrower decision
hope not. protecting the institution (lol) is not the job of Chief Justice. dude sucks.
I even have made $30,030 just in five weeks straightforwardly working part-time from my apartment. (fhg-02) Immediately when I've lost my last business, I was exhausted and luckily I found this top online task & with this I am in a position to obtain thousands directly through my home. Everybody is able to get this best career & can gain more dollars on-line going
this article.......... http://payout11.tk
searching for Amanda Hugankiss has anyone seen Amanda Hugankiss?
I remember that one from an incident where Bart Simpson called Moe down at the bar looking for "Amanda Kugankiss"!
much of my life revolves around Simpsons clips.
All of us internet denizens must have seen that clip long ago. But this sort of joke is much older than Simpsons. There was once an audio recording (pressed into vinyl for sale) of some group at a radio station making repeated prank calls of this sort to a bar owner who always fell for the gag, then went frothing mad with rage on the telephone. His death threats could be funnier than the prank call.
I used to think that leaving abortion up to the several states was the right thing to do, even though I actually agree that a foetus is not a human being until it gains a spirit - which it at quickening around 15 weeks.
Along with many people, I see that the spirit is the essential part of life rather than the body. This is abundantly clear when you explore the process of dying, death - when the spirit leaves the body.
Since the body clearly exists as a separate entity from the spirit at death, that implies the body and the spirit also exist separately at conception. Rather than the naive belief that a sperm impregnating an egg automatically and concurrently brings the spirit, this brings the important question: when does the spirit join the body? Many people see that this happens when the spirit quickens the body at around 3 months, 15 weeks.
I have now changed my mind. I am convinced of the validity of Justice Roberts' supposed approach by a very thoughtful article by Chavi Eve Karkowsky, a physician who specializes in high-risk pregnancies. see:
theatlantic. Com/ideas/archive/2022/05/roe-overturn-high-risk-pregnancy-late-abortion/629921/
You're very positive about something you cannot possibly know for certain.
If a single cell organism were found on Mars - scientists would be clamoring about life being discovered on Mars, but an embryo that begins replicating itself since soon after conception isn't "alive" until 15 weeks? That's inconsistent at best.
IMO - Life begins at conception, but, it's not my place to make these decisions for a woman. I don't have to agree with it, but these decisions are between a woman and her doctor. I do believe 15 weeks is probably a good compromise...
"... things do not look promising for the abortion rights side." The draft does not say that there is no right to an abortion. It does say that the Supreme Court cannot grant it. In practice, not much will change.
In practice, not much will change.
Except the criminalising of abortions in the cracker states, you mean?
When Roe v Wade was decided, abortion was legal in about 8 states. Roe v Wade was a terribly reasoned decision mostly focused on avoiding the affirmation of actual bodily autonomy for the people, which would undo much of the federal overreach.
So now when Roe v Wade goes down, the numbers are flipped. Approximately 8 states are expected to severely restrict or fully criminalize abortion.
So the reality for abortion enthusiasts in the near future will be an afternoon drive to the next state instead of going downtown for an in-n-out abortion. Yes, somewhat burdensome. Not the end of the world, not by a long shot and certainly not some kind of Handmaid's Tale dystopia I'm supposed to believe it is. Hint: Look at European abortion laws, are those women living in patriarchal oppression?
Abortion is the dumbest issue. Most overblown freakout of any political fight in our time.
>>overblown freakout of any political fight in our time
50 years of wealth transfer from middle class to ruling class also.
>Abortion is the dumbest issue. Most overblown freakout of any political fight in our time.
But also the most entertaining one. Fuck sports; this is where it's at.
Notice how those who lose their cookies about the argument are not people who are even able to reproduce: fat ugly womyn, homosexual men who wouldnt go near a uterus if they were paid, lesbians who have no desire to take a man's member, and the Generation Z types who have zero interpersonal skills, fear physical intimacy, marriage and think porn is creepy. Thank God for those fertile immigrants!
What a fucking creep and idiot.
Yeah, that's why so many Holywood stars are pro-life.
Joe Friday, the biggest moron in town, trying to use outliers to make claims about the mean. Not a surprise.
Flagged as racist.
SRG, not the woodchipper - - - - - -
Fat lesbians like SRG hate White Crackers. My sister-in-law tolerates her gay brother and me, his husband, but she has zero luv for fat lesbians. SRG probably wears flannel shirts to the beach.
Racist trash! MURDERING BABIES was never a right to begin with. It's called premeditated murder and maybe one day we as a society can start frying the butts of people who participate in the murder of the pre-born!
it's murder even if the aborted are future democrats?
No one is a born Democrat.
It takes an intense program of propaganda, indoctrination, and repeated severe brain damage to get a human to vote Democrat.
and many of them return to humanity as they mature and vote GOP...
Racist.
Can't wait to conceal carry in California! Can't wait for the shitlibs melting down all over the place when it happens. Can't wait for Antifa to violently protest the court decision on this!
And then you get to exercise your 2nd Amendment right against those ANTIFA trash and put them in the ground where they belong! That will be such a great day. Drop 'em and keep on droppin' 'em until you are out of bullets.
“Out of bullets”?
I’m not sure I understand what you mean.
With the current price of ammo 3 rounds is about a weeks rent
Antifa is already allowed to conceal carry - though illegally - gun chargers are the first to be waved by liberal DA's, but only for their constituents - don't you try it!! They'll try and fry you!!
At first reading, this post seemed to be about charging an electric gun (?) then waving it. I'm thinking that I'm the first person in 9 days to figure out a reasonable interpretation of this mess:
gun chargers = gun charges.
waved (like a flag) = waived.
If you don't want to look like a total fool with an incoherent post, proof read it yourself rather than relying on a spellchecker /autocorrect with no idea which word belongs there.
Sure seems like SCOTUS is not only a legislative body, but the most powerful one too.
Whatever, the drama and tears will be delicious.
I have it on good authority that Biden will issue an executive order overruling the ruling if it pretends to eliminate the clearest and most important right in the constitution.
I heard that today. Read an article on it at National Review. Seems like an extreme long shot (declaring a medical emergency, opening abortion clinics on military posts/bases) also he is trying to work around the Hyde Amendment. Fuck that! I support (purely on pragmatic reasons) abortion to around the end of the first trimester, but don't spend my fucking tax money on abortions. I find abortion morally reprehensible but think it should be legal through the first trimester. The government already spends far more of my money on things I find morally reprehensible, abortion doesn't need to be added to that list. Also, pretty sure abortion is not a good use of DoD land or funds and the medical emergency bullshit is doomed in the courts. It's even possible the 2nd circuit and the 9th might call bullshit on that move.
In these three cases, either way, what exactly will they be legislating? All three involve them deciding what the constitution allows or doesn’t allow which is, you know, their job. Whether you and I agree with what they decide or not.
All three involve them deciding what the constitution allows or doesn’t allow which is, you know, their job
I hope you recover soon from that near fatal fall off the turnip truck.
i barely recognized Elena Kagan. Not a good look.
"i barely recognized Elena Kagan. Not a good look."
She looks like somebody drew a face on their thumb.
There's a Meatloaf song about this.
Hot potootie?
"key precedents securing a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion."
Prove this is true you fucking retard.
It is an issue left to the states via the 10th ammendment.
Maybe when Dobbs is announced, the leaker will be also....hahahahaha!!! Sorry, I know that no one is interested in that. No journalists or any one really is trying to find this information out.
Thanks for this lovely blog! I will also share with my friends & once again. Thanks a lot.sexologist doctors near me