Watchdog Report: At Least 20 Percent of Federal Pandemic Unemployment Dollars Wasted
A new report from the Government Accountability Office found that nearly $80 billion was paid out to ineligible beneficiaries or outright fraudsters.

The federal government sent billions in unemployment aid to ineligible beneficiaries and outright fraudsters during the pandemic, according to a new watchdog report. At least $78 billion in jobless benefits, and potentially much more, were misspent during fiscal year 2021, according to a Tuesday report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
"Not only is the system falling short in meeting the needs of workers and the broader economy, but the potential for huge financial losses could undermine public confidence in the stewardship of government funds," said GAO head Gene Dorado in a press release yesterday, who called the report's findings "extremely troubling."
The Congressional watchdog agency has rated the unemployment insurance system as "high risk" for waste, fraud, and abuse and called on lawmakers and the administration to undertake immediate reforms.
The federal government's unemployment insurance system—jointly administered by the Department of Labor and a patchwork of state agencies—has long struggled with making improper payments. This problem only got worse during the pandemic, when Congress dumped billions more into an expanded number of unemployment assistance programs.
The GAO found that the improper payment rate jumped from 9 percent in the pre-pandemic fiscal year 2020 to 18.9 percent the next year. That means nearly one in five unemployment insurance dollars went to an ineligible or overpaid beneficiary.
There are multiple reasons for this sharp rise in improper payments.
The GAO reports that some states' legacy 40- and 50-year-old information technology systems used to administer benefits weren't up to the task of identifying potential fraud or overpayments. These same systems also struggled to handle totally new benefit programs covering self-employed workers like rideshare drivers, who typically aren't covered by unemployment insurance.
Federal rules on who was eligible to receive benefits were also "untimely and unclear," according to the GAO report. Some state officials told the agency they'd already set up programs and started sending money out the door by the time Labor Department guidance came down.
The massive increase in available unemployment funds also increased the rate of improper payments. Federal funding for unemployment benefits jumped from $86.9 billion in fiscal year 2020 to $410 billion in fiscal year 2021.
States often struggled to hire enough people to administer these new benefits. The staff they did hire were often undertrained.
The huge increase in unemployment benefits also became a target for fraudsters. The GAO reports that 146 people have pleaded guilty to federal charges of defrauding unemployment systems. In California, for instance, the state paid an estimated $400 million on fraudulent claims made in the name of state prison inmates.
Federal pandemic relief programs typically failed in one of two ways.
Some, like the Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses, prioritized quickly getting money out the door. That resulted in limited vetting of applications, and, consequently, lots of fraud.
Other programs, particularly emergency rental assistance, layered lots of eligibility criteria on the release of funds. That likely prevented fraud and overpayment, but seriously hindered the dispersal of benefits.
The unemployment insurance system's performance during the pandemic shows that these failures aren't mutually exclusive. In addition to overpaying beneficiaries or rewarding fraudulent claims, the GAO found that states also had difficulty efficiently getting money to people who actually qualified for it.
Stories of jobless workers trying to navigate the unemployment insurance bureaucracy or waiting endlessly for benefits were a staple of early pandemic journalism.
We may never get a full accounting of how much unemployment money was misspent. The GAO says that states and the Department of Labor failed to properly track improper payments. The Labor Department's Inspector General estimates that as much as $163 billion in unemployment funds were misspent, the Washington Post reports.
Things don't appear to be getting better either. The GAO report says that the improper payment rate isn't expected to improve for fiscal year 2022
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Again, as per usual, the problem is the government doing something markets would handle better, because this kind of fraud would drive companies out of business. Unemployment insurance was designed to be scammed, since the premiums are fixed. Private company premiums would be based on your work record and what level of coverage you want. True socialist unemployment would have no premiums.
I worked with too many people who got themselves fired (can't collect if you quit) after their unemployment insurance was fully restocked, treating it as earned vacation, and who can blame them? That's what the incentives encourage.
But there's a problem here... I lost my job because Gavin Newsom told me I was "non-essential" (Is that Irony? I can never tell).
I'm imagining being a private unemployment insurer and suddenly faced with eleventy billion claims that came about because Gavin Newsom had a pen and a phone. So who's ultimately responsible for that payout?
I'm no insurance expert, but a lot of insurance contracts have things like Force majeure language in them. I can imagine this free market invoking those claims (that admittedly no one would have thought possible in 2019) and suddenly you've got eleventy billion claimants petitioning the government that "the market failed" because the insurance isn't paying out because Gavin Newsom declared an emergency. And then Bernie Sanders and the rest of the Democrats (who literally created the problem) are on my TV bitching about the greedy insurance companies.
It seems no matter how this game plays out, it ends up at the same space on the board.
Yes, I know private insurance is a non-starter as long as the government rigs the system. That's why government would have to be shrunk to 1% or less of its current size, and why it will never happen, and why government will continue expanding to take over everything, whether fasistically or socialistically.
That's what happens when megalomaniacal totalitarians are allowed any measure of power, they use any means available to them to leverage more power.
Well the real problem is this notion of Unemployment Insurance. That's called savings.
There are cases where unemployment insurance makes sense- people starting out in their career who haven't developed long term savings. But after a certain term, it makes more sense to put those premiums towards a savings account.
I know that the common retort is "people are stupid and won't do that". But my experience is that a lot of people are stupid when the government and other norms allow them to be stupid. When the stakes are real, people suddenly end up doing a lot of the things a self sufficient person ought to be doing.
Gavin Newsome is responsible. Personally. But he can't afford it. And deflects blame anyway. So he makes his subjects pay for it. Or has the Feds make all their subjects pay for it.
There's also something here about the government keeping its purposes narrow and focused and work on making those somewhat efficient. There's always new expansions to power rather than going back and making sure what they do is done well.
There are many cases like this in our federal government, where new expansion occurs even when just actually enforcing rules as they exist now would suffice. Taxes are a great example. They tend to push towards creating new taxes rather than tweaking the many different tax rates that already exist.
Actually, the premiums fluctuate with a company's record of laying off a bunch of folks, or just a few. Also, a long time ago in a USA far far away, you had to be actively looking for work to continue receiving UI benefits. As in show up in person and sign a statement each week listing all the places you applied. And you had to go to interviews the state set up for you.
But that was then and this is now.
So this is just one more record Biden has set.
Sounds racist.
A new report from the Government Accountability Office found that nearly $80 billion was paid out to ineligible beneficiaries or outright fraudsters.
This is the kind of thing that used to get my libertarian blood up. Now I just look at it and say, "yeah, and? What did you expect?"
Watchdog Report: 100 Percent of Federal Pandemic Unemployment Dollars Wasted
FIFY
Only 20%? By government standards that's pretty darn good.
Yeah, it feels like that 20% is a lowball estimate.
Sure, it's not that much, but 80 billion here, 80 billion there, pretty soon you're talking about real money.
I agree that it must be much more than 20%. I would include people like me on social security who were no worse off during the pandemic, in fact probably saving money because you couldn't go to a restaurant. People should have been going to those who legitimately needed it, not everyone, regardless of need and a little extra to the grifters.
The money, not people. No edit button?
"Not only is the system falling short in meeting the needs of workers and the broader economy, but the potential for huge financial losses could undermine public confidence in the stewardship of government funds,"
So at least there's an upside, if people stop trusting the government to be a responsible steward of their money. If we can mine this properly and prove that the ultimate authority on how best to use your money is you, then perhaps we can start slowly peeling back the grift.
It’s only wasted if you don’t understand it’s purpose.
Rampant inflation and increasing the govt debt?
*all* federal pandemic unemployment dollars were wasted
That's nothing. What about soft graft ....
"I guess I could seriously go looking for a new job. But I still have ten weeks left until my unemployment eligibility runs out. I need that time to chill and reevaluate everything."
"Everyone has a right to basic living. In this cruel country you have to work for even the first dollar. At least unemployment puts a base under you, for a while, although you do have to go through the motions of 'applying' for a job. Everyone should get Universal Basic Income as a right."
"I paid for my unemployment, so it is my choice to draw it out now." [employer pays unemployment 'insurance premium]
"But waste was of the essence of the scheme" (Robert Frost, "Pod of the Milkweed")