The American Rescue Plan Bailed Out Unprofitable Government-Owned Golf Courses
Perhaps the government shouldn't be running golf courses in the first place?

An unnecessary federal bailout of state and local governments has given an undeserved mulligan to some money-losing government-owned golf courses.
That's despite the fact that some of those same courses reported an increase in customers during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to reports submitted to the Treasury Department and reviewed by Reason, Union County, New Jersey, has committed $929,000 of its federal COVID funds to a pair of county-owned golf courses: Galloping Hill and Ash Brook. That spending will help the courses cover "costs associated with increased use" as a result of "an increase in play at county golf courses due to the COVID-19 pandemic."
That's the sort of problem that many private businesses would probably love to have. Either as the result of government-imposed lockdowns or changes in consumer behavior during the pandemic, recreational spending on restaurants, bars, concert venues, and theaters plummeted. If that made golfing—an outdoor, socially distanced activity—more popular, why should taxpayers now have to bail out a business that got more successful?
Perhaps the problem is that government shouldn't be trying to run golf courses in the first place. Union County's Galloping Hill course was losing $500,000 annually as recently as 2007, according to NJ Monthly. To "solve" that problem, county officials decided to dump $17.6 million in public money into upgrades at the course. The latest bailout, then, is just another in a long line of poor decisions made by the county's elected leaders.
They're hardly alone. In a report published earlier this year, the Reason Foundation (the nonprofit that publishes this website) found that 155 local governments lost a combined $61 million by running golf courses during their 2020 fiscal years. One of the biggest losers was Thousand Oaks, California, which lost a staggering $800,023 on a single city-owned golf course in 2020.
Naturally, that course got a piece of the federal bailout too. The Treasury Department's tracker of American Rescue Plan spending shows that Thousand Oaks plans to spend more than $14 million on "revenue replacement" on a variety of items, including "city-owned theatres and golf course." It's not clear from the data provided to the Treasury Department how much of that money will be spent on the golf course (nor is it clear why the city owns multiple theaters, but that's for another day).
"Rather than use COVID funds to backfill golf course losses, cities would be better served by selling them," says Marc Joffe, a senior fellow at the Reason Foundation and author of the recent report on government-owned golf courses. "Land in California is quite valuable, and a private entity could probably put the land to better uses and would pay for the privilege of doing so."
And if it failed at doing that, at least taxpayers who have never set foot in Thousand Oaks or Union County and never picked up a golf club wouldn't have to foot the bill for a bailout.
"Congress really put taxpayers in the rough," says Tom Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste, a fiscally conservative nonprofit. He says Congress should have placed stricter limits on how the $350 billion state and local government bailout could be used.
Those funds were included in the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, passed by Congress in March 2021, and were ostensibly meant to cover pandemic-related public health costs or to offset lost tax revenue due to the economic consequences of COVID-19. Even before the law was passed, there were questions about whether such a large bailout of state and local tax coffers was necessary or prudent.
It seems to have been neither, as most governments did not experience a significant revenue shortfall due to the pandemic. Now flush with extra cash from Washington and few restrictions on how to use it, some state and local governments are blowing the money on pet projects like government-owned golf courses and bonuses for government workers, as Reason detailed yesterday.
"They overstimulated the economy, clearly," Schatz tells Reason, "and they obviously handed way too much money to state and local governments if this is how it is being used."
Other obviously vital public health costs being covered by the American Rescue Plan's local government bailout fund include the planting of new trees "including ash, spruce, maple, pine, [and] cherry" and the installation of a new irrigation system at a government-owned golf course in Elmira, New York, according to Treasury Department data. That'll burn through $1.2 million of federal funds.
In Lexington, Kentucky, a government-owned course that brags about containing "the longest par-5" hole in the state, will be getting a new irrigation system with the help of more than $1.3 million from the federal bailout. The course is already "a local favorite and an attraction to visitors," the county wrote in its project summary submitted to the Treasury Department, but the desired upgrades haven't been made due to a lack of funding from the local government.
Thank goodness there was a global pandemic that required the federal government to tee up the cash instead.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm not a golfer, but I remember visiting a naval station on the west coast with a nice looking golf course (this was in the early 90s). It was a Seabee center - maybe building golf courses was part of their training.
What do you know, it's still there!
My late father-in-law was a snowbird wintering in Florida. One of the attractions was playing cheap golf on military courses. As a retired member of the military, he was entitled to use the courses.
I am curious about the use ratio for enlisted vs officers on military courses? Anyone know the answer? My father-in-law was an officer.
"I’ve got just the place for low-cost housing, I have solved this problem, I know where we can build housing for the homeless: GOLF COURSES!!! Perfect! Golf courses! Just what we need! Just what we need: plenty of good land in nice neighbourhoods, land that is currently being wasted on a meaningless, mindless activity, engaged in primarily by white, well-to-do, male businessmen who use the game to get together to make deals to carve this country up a little finer among themselves. I am getting tired… really… getting… tired of these golfing c*cksuckers in their green pants, and their yellow pants, and their orange pants, and their precious little hats, and their cute little golf carts! It is time to reclaim the golf courses from the wealthy and turn them over to the homeless. Golf is an arrogant, elitist game and it takes up entirely too much room in this country. It is an arrogant game on its very design alone. Just the design of the game SPEAKS of arrogance! Think of how big a golf course is… THE BALL IS THAT F**KING BIG!!! WHAT DO THESE PIN-HEADED PRICKS NEED WITH ALL THAT LAND?!!! There are over 17,000 golf courses in America, they average over 150 acres apiece, that’s 3 million plus acres, 4,820 square miles… you could build two Rhode Island’s and a Delaware for the homeless on the land currently being wasted on this meaningless, mindless, arrogant, elitist, racist – there’s another thing; the only blacks you’ll find in country clubs are carrying trays – and a boring game… boring game for boring people. You ever watch golf on television? It’s like watching flies f**k! And-and a mindless game, mindless, think of the intellect it must take to draw pleasure from this activity: hitting a ball with a crooked stick… and then… walking after it… and then… HITTING IT AGAIN!!! I SAY PICK IT UP A**HOLE!!! YOU’RE LUCKY YOU FOUND THE F**KING THING!!! PUT IT IN YOUR POCKET AND GO THE F**K HOME!!! YOU’RE A WINNER!!! YOU’RE A WINNER!!! YOU FOUND IT!!! No… never happens… no… no chance of that happening; Dorko in the plaid knickers is going to hit it again and walk some more. Let these rich c*cksuckers play miniature golf. Let ‘em f**k with a windmill for an hour and a half or so… see if there’s really any skill among these people. Now I know there are some people who play golf who don’t consider themselves rich… F**K ‘EM!!! And shame on them for engaging in an arrogant, elitist pastime."
-George Carlin
He obviously came up with this bit before Tiger Woods.
sounds like someone couldn't handle his 4-iron.
Or before it became huge in Asia. Though it's incredibly elite there as I understand it as well.
But, that's not really the main point of his argument. Which is basically that he's angry.
Because there's no other vacant land anywhere.
Made me wonder how much is actually used for golf courses now, and I came up with this article which has another really interesting graph attached:
https://golfweek.usatoday.com/2018/07/31/2-million-acres-devoted-to-golf-courses-across-the-u-s-report-says/
Also, this reads like late Carlin where he had stopped making jokes and just sort of bitched about whatever was bothering him on any given day.
I fail to see how replacing 3 million acres dedicated to the equivalent of watching two flies fuck with 3 million acres dedicated to watching homeless people fuck is a significant improvement.
" . . . is just another in a long line of poor decisions made by the county's elected leaders."
What poor decision? It got all the members to contribute to political campaigns, didn't it?
Fixed
In Wake County NC, they are using these funds to increase diveristy of the local fire department.
https://www.wakegov.com/news/wake-county-launches-initiative-ignite-new-interest-fire-careers-and-cultivate-diverse-workplaces
Skin color is the most important thing
At work I'm interviewing people for a job. Yesterday I get a resume from a high school student who's parents I know. I refer it to HR with a request to get him in for an interview. The answer was "not at this time, because I haven't interviewed enough minorities." I asked how many minorities have applied? The answer was "None."
Went through the same discussion with my BIL who needed to hire an engineer and my MIL, who's a retired public school teacher. Both were upset that HR wasn't doing more to find more minority candidates for his position in a "top" 1,000-10,000 aerospace company. I ran down suggestions to fix the problem. The rejections, between unwittingly racist (by their precepts) and outright nonsensical, convinced me that they either don't really care about the issue, are immune to logic, or both. It wasn't until I got home that Mrs. Casual righted my thinking: I was an attendee at a pity party between an upper-middle class gay man and his mother, trying to solve the problem.
I don't think Rescue Plan funds were used but my county just bought a private golf course, but it was to tear down the country club and add more detention. I think the plan at one point had 9 holes staying open, I don't know if that is still in the plan. It actually is some of the best use of the land since it is in the floodway and 100-year flood plain. Harris County has tons of soccer and baseball fields in parks along the bayous. We have tons of well-managed parks because the land is in the floodway. So, while I am sure not all of these golf courses are of that variety, it might require a bit more looking to see if there is a good semi-logical reason as to why the land is being used that way.
Two comments:
He says Congress should have placed stricter limits on how the $350 billion state and local government bailout could be used.
This is probably a horrible idea. Congress should have spent less money, tremendously less money. Micromanaging it wouldn't have made it better though, it would almost certainly have made it worse and have led to ugly culture war fights. If the feds are going to do a shitty bailout of states that don't need it, it's still probably better overall to just let the states manage it themselves. They're actually better at their own issues than the federal government is. You're going to get money spent in ways you disagree with regardless (which is what this article is about ultimately), but the politics of the bullshit can be at least pushed down to local discussion.
Second, I agree with your top line. I think governments shouldn't make parks either. There is a weird cultural thing though where we make these arguments about certain things, like golf courses, but less often about parks, which people are always demanding more of even though they often turn into homeless camps unless they're rigorously policed.
Also, anyone find what the actual number was spent on golf courses? They mention stuff about how they often run at a loss and all that, but how much of the bailout cash was spent on golf courses?
"...There is a weird cultural thing though where we make these arguments about certain things, like golf courses, but less often about parks, which people are always demanding more of even though they often turn into homeless camps unless they're rigorously policed..."
Near us, we have Rec-and-Park-managed parks, and they aren't. We also have parks, open to the public, which are managed by the HOA of the surrounding condos. They are managed, and the sprinklers tend to keep the bums out.
The Nazi-Regime owns golf courses too!!!
Color me; Not surprised....
And to think; I thought this was the USA.
Remember that was your Congressperson in the House and the Senate. Democrats and Republicans, every one of them, some Senators didn't vote because of self quarantines but still supported that bill. That also made the bill veto proof. You are paying for that in inflation because of $5 trillion in printed money. And you will pay for the rest of your life in higher prices. Do you still have those few paltry thousands the government sent you? I hope you enjoyed it.
Why shouldn't governments spend money providing sporting facilities for their citizens? Granted, golf is an abomination, but golfists seem to like it.
The real question is how on earth a golf course can be unprofitable when you aren't even factoring in the value of the land it's on. I've seen municipal golf courses in various countries and they're all extremely profitable thanks to being built on free land.
"Why shouldn't governments spend money providing sporting facilities" --- Um.... Because in the USA the government is suppose to be the economy??? (Communist Nation).
Why are public courses losing money. Because they don't charge the going rate for round at a private course.
My city of Madison, WI has four city owned golf courses. They lose money and there are frequent arguments to close them. That never happens.
BTW - right now there is a plan to turn half the 36 holer into a garbage dump. I fully support the idea. I think the land will be put to better use for the citizens.