No, Palm Springs Isn't Giving a Basic Income to Transgender and Nonbinary Residents
Palm Springs officials aren't off the hook for questionable decisions, but the spending isn't what it looks like.

"California city to give universal income to transgender, nonbinary residents regardless of earnings," reported Fox News yesterday. "Transgender residents in Palm Springs, California are eligible to receive a UBI of up to $900 per month solely for identifying as transgender or nonbinary—no strings attached," writes reporter Houston Keene.
That's not really true.
The article badly misrepresents what actually transpired in Palm Springs, where no universal basic income program is even in the works.
Fox News and affiliates are not the only ones to misreport this story. For instance, NBC 4 Los Angeles and Los Angeles magazine also offered confusing takes.
In reality, the Palm Springs City Council approved $200,000 for two local nonprofits looking to study and design a potential guaranteed income pilot program. "The initial financial support from the City of Palm Springs will enable [DAP Health and Queer Works] to study best practices of successful initiatives nationwide, conduct local research, and gain local input to inform their design process," DAP Health explained in a press release.
Palm Springs officials aren't off the hook for questionable decisions—$200,000 is a lot of money for a study group. Surely there are more important things the city could be doing with those funds.
But the idea that the city is set to run its own guaranteed income program—and that this program will give cash to nonbinary and transgender residents regardless of need—is simply wrong.
With the money the city provided, DAP Health and Queer Works are working on a proposal that they "will use to engage potential government and philanthropic financial underwriters for the pilot." There's no guarantee they'll actually succeed in getting these funders. The state of California is soliciting proposals for guaranteed income pilot programs, but DAP Health and Queer Works have a long way to go before even submitting their program for consideration.
And while DAP Health and Queer Works have "indicated their intent to prioritize support for local individuals who are Transgender and Non-Binary," it's not clear what this will look like. Their current idea is to provide between $600 and $900 a month to people enrolled in their pilot program, but "most specifics have yet to be determined," the groups said.
Nowhere do they indicate that people enrolled in the theoretical pilot program wouldn't have to meet any sort of eligibility requirements. In a proposal summary, Queer Works says conditions "such as legal status, job history and education requirements" will not determine eligibility and that more detailed eligibility requirements will be finalized as part of its research and design phase.
In any event, Palm Springs officials don't seem inclined to support the program beyond their current $200,000 investment.
"Queer Works CEO Jacob Rostovsky said that the City of Palm Springs would likely need to agree to match the funds provided by the state for the state to agree to fund the program," according to the Desert Sun. But council members "expressed reservations" about doing so.
Palm Springs Mayor Lisa Middleton, who is transgender, is also skeptical. "My serious concern is the ability of these guaranteed income programs to scale up to the magnitude of the issue that is before us," she said during a March 24 city council meeting.
"My vote to affirm that evening was procedural to provide $200,000 to DAP in order to help them in the application for state funding," Middleton told Fox News in an email. "In advance of the vote I specifically stated my belief that guaranteed income programs were not the long-term way to proceed. I did not commit to any future funding of guaranteed income programs."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Palm Springs officials aren't off the hook for questionable decisions, but the spending isn't what it looks like.
I haven't even read the post, and I'm already getting that 'step-two' phase feeling of, "Well, w... well, ok, what you claimed IS happening, but it's not as bad as you think..."
In reality, the Palm Springs City Council approved $200,000 for two local nonprofits looking to study and design a potential guaranteed income pilot program. "The initial financial support from the City of Palm Springs will enable [DAP Health and Queer Works] to study best practices of successful initiatives nationwide, conduct local research, and gain local input to inform their design process," DAP Health explained in a press release.
Yeah, definitely phase 2. Countdown until phase 3?
The mayor pretty much says, "I can't support this program because $200K pot isn't big enough."
So ENB is correct, there is no support for an LGBTQI2+ UBI program. None whatsoever.
Home income solution to enable everyone to work online and receive weekly payments to bank acc. Earn over $500 every day and get payouts every week straight to account bank. (ui20) My last month of income was $30,390 and all I do is work up to 4 hours a day on my computer. Easy work and steady income are great with this job.
.
More information. >> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
Please forward this to poor queer and transgender folks in Palm Springs so the city won’t have to pay them a stipend.
ENB is an expert at badly misinterpreting things.
It's interesting comparing this story to Stossel's.
https://reason.com/2022/04/06/the-media-and-big-tech-covered-up-these-stories-theres-been-no-reckoning/
ENB and Reason flat out said that they weren't going to cover the Hunter's Laptop story because it might, possibly, maybe, could be fake even though the sources were solid. But look at her rush to debunk something that even those involved admit is kinda true, just because it reflects negatively on the left.
That can't be true.
https://adfontesmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/media-bias-chart_3.0_Hi-Res.jpg
See? Reason is right wing publication...*insert eyeroll*
The problem is that there's no "imperialist" on that chart.
There's the adage about headlines that ask a Yes/No question. Is there an adage about headlines that start with "No" follow by a comma?
Yes, yes there is. The answer is yes.
So it's like Midwestern, Scandinavian lingo, Yeah, no means yes and no, yeah means no?
Uff dah! Got that backwards, sorry, yeah no means no and no, yeah means yes. Sorry, it's easier when you're using it in a conversation rather than typing it.
Yeah, right.
Yeah, ya betcha.
That's "Yah, you betcha." Went to college in da UP.
Midwestern, Scandinavian lingo
*sips coffee*
Ooh... yeah, I'm going to have to go ahead and, uh, kinda disagree with you there. If you could go back and correct that to pretty much any passive-aggressive dialect. That'd be great.
The adage is "You talkin' to me?"
I've said it before, but it needs repeating to the point of shouting to the mountaintops. Here's the Libertarian Idea of Universal Baslc Income:
Find and/or develop a product or a service that others are willing to pay you money and benefits to receive in exchange. Direct your goods and services to those willing to pay the most money and benefits to you for your goods and services. Wash, rinse, and repeat until you've got all the money and benefits that the market will bear for your product or service.!
Spend less than you take in and invest what invest you don't spend into profit-making and dividend-generating endeavors who sell stock shares! Best yet, get a collection of these stock shares from multiple endeavors called a mutual fund and spread your investment across multiple secors of the economy!
Invest a fixed amount on a regular basis so you automatically buy less when the share price is high and buy more when the share prices are low! This is called Dollar Cost Averaging and it helps you weather the ups-and-downs and ebbs-and-flow of the stock market!
It's Universal! It's Basic! And it'll earn you Income every time it is tried!
And it'll earn you Income every time it is tried!
Not every time it's tried. But the times it doesn't earn you income, your lack of income won't be your primary concern.
And while DAP Health and Queer Works have "indicated their intent to prioritize support for local individuals who are Transgender and Non-Binary,"
So they start with an approach already held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court - - - -
Some animals are more equal than others in this dawning of equity.
"In any event, Palm Springs officials don't seem inclined to support the program beyond their current $200,000 investment."
So the $200,000 is not an investment, but a political payoff?
"That's not really true.
The article badly misrepresents what actually transpired in Palm Springs, where no universal basic income program is even in the works.
...
In reality, the Palm Springs City Council approved $200,000 for two local nonprofits looking to study and design a potential guaranteed income pilot program.
...
And while DAP Health and Queer Works have "indicated their intent to prioritize support for local individuals who are Transgender and Non-Binary," it's not clear what this will look like. Their current idea is to provide between $600 and $900 a month to people enrolled in their pilot program
...
Palm Springs Mayor Lisa Middleton, who is transgender, is also skeptical. "My serious concern is the ability of these guaranteed income programs to scale up to the magnitude of the issue that is before us," she said during a March 24 city council meeting.
"I don't have a hand at all really and, even if I did, it wouldn't be a very good one, that said... ALL IN!"
Playing poker with people too stupid to know how the game is played is fun.
Why do they need money? I was told we are all equal.
Some are more equal than others?
Have you seen the cost of transition surgery?
Biologically imposed cost, like being black, that's why those of us with cis-privilege should be on the hook for it.
"""My vote to affirm that evening was procedural to provide $200,000 to DAP in order to help them in the application for state funding,"""
I don't think the state has a program for funding UBI.
Application denied.
FTFY
They should have spent that $200k on billboards in Florida if they really wanted to help Qs and Ts.
I am wondering; are bill boards copyrighted?
I mean, could DeSantis put up boards with the same message, but add a trailer at the bottom "I am Ron DeSantis, and I approve this message"?
Depending on how he presents it, I don't think it runs afoul of copyright. Presumably, he wouldn't be passing it off as his own so he would ascribe it to elite CA SJW retards (or sources more accurate) and he wouldn't be approving their message as his, he would be approving them sending it as theirs. I'm free to say, "I approve of Kellogs® Froot Loops® claim they are 'part of a complete breakfast©'." No different than if he put up a billboard saying: "Poor kids are just as bright as white kids" - Joe Biden
Wrong Palm Springs.
"But the idea that the city is set to run its own guaranteed income program—and that this program will give cash to nonbinary and transgender residents regardless of need—is simply wrong"
We're splitting very fine hairs here.
Yes, they were not giving people money - but they were 'set' to do so. That was the point of the study - to look at best practices for designing such a giveaway.
Remember - it wasn't a feasibility study. It wasn't a 'pros vs cons' study. It was a 'how best to implement this' study.
Like I said, phase 2... phase 2, which apparently is teetering on the brink of phase 3.
Yeah and it appears it starts from a faulty premise and goes on from there. They're supposed to look at models in the US that have successfully implemented USB programs. Shouldn't the premise be first, to see if anyone has had success with USB programs and then see how they did it, rather than assume they've been successful? I mean I've only taken several graduate level classes dealing with research design, so what do I know.
So the Fox story exaggerates by taking the idea and its intended process to its logical end, which hasn't happened yet and may very well not happen, but yet it's really not wrong, it just might not actually come to fruition. But the goal is definitely there.
ENB should work for Politifact.
Claim: Palm Springs preparing to implement a UBI for LGBTQI2+ people.
ENB: FALSE!
Claim: Charges against Trump were dismissed.
Fact-Check: "Technically True But Misleading."
"Lacking context."
Doesn't matter if it's true or not, the narrative has now been set and all that matters in the post-truth world is the narrative. All rumours you want to believe are true and if you disagree you are just a filthy groomer.
As Agammamon (and mad.casual) point out above, we're splitting some pretty fine hairs here.
There IS a plan for a UBI for LGBTQI2+ people, the desire IS to put it in place, the intent IS to implement it, there are just some details to work out, and the Mayor thinks that $200k isn't enough. ENB seems to take issue with the Fox characterization of "no strings attached", where ENB speculates that at this early stage, there might end up being strings attached, so Fox is stating facts not in evidence.
For instance, Palm Springs might say that you can't be like, beefcake Tom Hardy gay, but super-Twinky and lipsy gay to get the UBI. Details to be worked out.
This article could be entirely re-written as "Palm Springs prepares to give transgender and nonbinary residents cash" and it would be 100% accurate.
Or, her denial is basically they haven't implemented it yet, just spending money on how best to implement it. Which is totally different for... Reasons.
Now do “Don’t Say Gay”
In reality, the Palm Springs City Council approved $200,000 for two local nonprofits looking to study and design a potential guaranteed income pilot program.
The Fox News article you accused of getting this wrong actually state this ENB... what was your argument against them?
The program is also solely for the group in the headline.
Not sure what your actual criticism of Fox is for saying the same thing you said.
Fox said "there are no strings attached".
There might be strings attached. So ruling: Liar Liar Pants on Fiar.
Fox quoted the group that is supposed to handle the distribution and conclusion of the study.
There are always strings attached with UBI, namely, these schemes reach the end of their rope when they run out of money to beg and plunder.
There might be strings attached.
My understanding is that any attached strings be tucked away or severed in order to receive the funds.
Her argument is Fox is yucky.
She didn't read the actual FNC article and just went off the headline when someone retweeted it?
That’s unconstitutional, hardworking taxpayers pay the bill!
"...Surely there are more important things the city could be doing with those funds..."
Letting the taxpayers keep it is top of the list.
And don't call me Shirley unless you're gonna pay me.
From us in Northern Cali - Fuck those people. I never met a woman who had a boner. And if he did, it was just a dude playing dress up. Wait til' they get the anti-abortion (Baby killer) Tranny. Then you girls will go full reversal an your acceptance of a man dominating you once again.
And I was just about to move to Palm Springs and change my name to Nancy.
Nancy Flannigan?
Well, you just missed Holly from Miami, FLA. She's hickhiking her way accross the U.S.A.! And "she plucked her eyebrows along the way, shaved her legs and then 'he' was a 'she'!"
That bitch don't need UBI! Now there's some real Pioneer initiative and moxie these Palm Springs LGBTQ+ ain't got! 🙂
Lou Reed sucked..seriously his music sucked. He dared attack Pete Townsend calling him a no talent..sorry Lou but you were a one hit wonder..sort of.
Whatever his tiff with Pete Townsend, I think Reed wrote some hellacious lyrics. Here's a set of lyrics that very aptly captures the mindset of Twentieth and Twenty-First Century "Top Men":
The Warrior King (Revenge)
https://youtu.be/zZhy8_c55ew
So...one queer person is getting paid to write a report with a predetermined conclusion that the city should fund a trans UBI? Did I get the right?
Yes
But actually stating it that way means you're wrong, even though that's what the facts are.
And "reason" thinks this is a legitimate government function because ... ? Instead of giving it a Golden Fleece award, you're defending it? Why? Just because somebody said the magic word LGB#*&whatever? This just proves my belief that "reason" is a libterd front.
Reason doesn’t think anything. ENB wrote the article, and she wrote: “Palm Springs officials aren't off the hook for questionable decisions—$200,000 is a lot of money for a study group. Surely there are more important things the city could be doing with those funds.”
As a Pansexual and a Libertarian, I am against this, just like I was against and never spent the first two "Stimulus" Checks and I am equally against the added $250 a month per child added to the Earned Income Tax Credit for breeders, which I'm also against!
Goddamnit, I can "Root, Hog, or Die," as well as "improvise, stretch it out, make do, and do without" as good as anyone else and everyone else can too!
This UBI shit--and directed at LGBTQ+ people in particular--is a patronizing, condescending insult to rational economic animals everywhere and is no substitute for what LGBTQ+ people really need: Equal Individual Rights and Justice Before The Law For All!
You're against the two "stimulus" checks but I bet you kept the money, right?
I got the money first through a paper check, then through a debit card.
The paper check is expired and I haven't yet found out where to send the money on the debit card back. Work and medical situations have kept me too busy to ask, but when I get a moment, I'm finding out.
A likely story.
"Well, it is not a functioning program to give a stipend to LGBT people...
...yet."
So, the city voted to approve $200K to study/prepare to apply for a state program to fund a UBI program that "prioritizes" LGBTQ+ residents.
So, the plan is to offer UBI, and to "prioritize" the alphabet community, the issue is that the money will likely come from the state, not Palm Springs if approved.
Why did the city spend $200K? What exactly is the application process that it costs so much? This $200K study will conclude that the benefits of free money to alphabet people s so great we just have to match the state donation dollar-for-dollar, lest Palm Springs be declared alphabet-phobic!
Someone in the city council has a crack child that needs some graft.
Not everyone can get thier child a do nothing job that pays $50k a month in Ukraine.
9 years ago I honestly thought that biological males competing in woman’s sports and hanging out in woman’s locker room was a religious conservative conspiracy theory.
If anything it’s a sweet kickback to the braintrust running the “NON PROFIT” and their large salaries.
Whatever
Last month some were ridiculing me as a conspiracy nut for stating that people are actively trying to add pedophilia to the alphabet soup of alternative sexual preferences, and then when I cited actual facts, I was told it's only a fringe movement. Based upon transgender activism, I'm pretty sure we'll soon be debating this issue nationally and getting called pedophobes (not sure if this will be the label they'll apply, but it seems the most logical way to add phobia to opposition to kiddie diddling) for opposing it. Reason has already ran several articles ridiculing Republicans for asking Jackson about the multiple times she has given light sentences to child porn possessors.
https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1511830335352414216?t=JGiPDPceCkNCUR3PnR1J-w&s=19
#Groomers
[Link]
Perhaps it is time to point out that a phobia is an IRRATIONAL fear of something.
Done it multiple times, doesn't phase them.
Grifting when based on groups was always race based (BLM, Jesse Jackson and so on), now we have a new grifter "groups", transexuals and non binary (which honestly I can't figure out what that is). Your sexual preference is your business..opposite sex, same sex but your preference or even if your "identification" of the opposite biological sex doesn't give you privilege via the tax payer. And no there are not millions of little boys and girls who are being denied their true "sexuality"...just stop that please..its child abuse to push a six year old who maybe plays with this sister's barbie dolls to get castrated...
It’s the parents, not the kids, who are pushing this trans/non-binary stuff. Worked with a woman a few years ago who one day started referring to her daughter as Andrew and mentioned that she was gender queer. This woman was kind of a basket case herself and always complaining about her health, aches pains etc. So it seems like if a girl is a bit of a tomboy or boy a little effeminate, these types of parents who themselves have mental problems make the decision that their kid has to be transgender.
Disgusting animals stealing from the Taxpayers.
The Washington Post is also covering this, and pretty well.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/04/06/palm-springs-guaranteed-basic-income-transgender-residents/
As Reason authors are fond of pointing out: headlines are not the story. And as Reason's extensive quoting from the article shows, the article itself is accurate.
Whatever it is, this city agreed to fund the pursuit of a benefit that would be conveyed to people on the basis of some aspect of sex. Thus, they are spending their citizen's money on something that is unconstitutional.
"I didn't pay to have my wife murdered. I paid for a study to see how the bit@h might be murdered, and how to go about getting it done."
And noted my disappointment that my $200K wouldn't go far enough to address the problem.
Ah. So it's totally just one of those "patronage things", then?
Transgender mayor, grant money for something that's very similar to that old "we just want the same rights as hetero couples and hahah of course we're not recruiting your kids and it's totally not a slippery slope" thing, just more innocent.
I am totally reassured by the article. The money is being paid off to the mayors queer supporters, and "Palm Springs Isn't Giving a Basic Income to Transgender and Nonbinary Residents". Yet.
Splitting hairs. Ok, they're not spending big money to run a guaranteed-income program, yet. Right now they're just blowing $200k to study an idea that ought to be rejected outright. Cool, when the inevitable predetermined outcome to approve the program becomes official, it'll cost way more than that.