Speed Cameras

Chicago's More Aggressive Speed Cameras Issued 2.8 Million Tickets Last Year

The city's army of 160 speed cameras issued a ticket every 11 seconds during 2021 and generated $89 million in revenue.

|

After rejiggering its speed cameras to fine any car caught traveling as little as 6 mph over the posted speed limit, the city of Chicago collected record-breaking levels of revenue last year.

Chicago's army of 160 speed cameras issued more than 2.81 million tickets last year and collected $89 million in revenue from motorists, according to data from the Chicago Department of Finance published this week by the Illinois Policy Institute, a free market think tank. That's more tickets than there are residents of the city, and translates to one ticket issued every 11 seconds during the entire year.

Those numbers shatter the city's previous speed camera ticket and revenue totals, likely due to the fact that Mayor Lori Lightfoot in March 2021 ordered the cameras to start targeting slower drivers. Previously, the speed cameras had been programmed to issue tickets and $100 fines to drivers going more than 10 mph over the speed limit. Those fines remain in place, but the city's cameras now also issue $35 fines to drivers going between 6 and 10 mph over the speed limit.

Those $35 tickets accounted for more than two-thirds of the tickets issued by Chicago's cameras during 2021, according to the Department of Finance data.

Lightfoot and other advocates of the speed cameras argue that they make Chicago's streets safer by discouraging high-speed driving, but the Illinois Policy Institute points out that more people died in car accidents in the city during 2021 than in 2020 or 2019.

"The safety argument seems weak in light of the various studies and increase in accident deaths, especially when the cameras are generating so much money for a city with massive pension debt and spending it can't seem to control," writes Patrick Andriesen, a staff writer at the institute. "Speed cameras might be more accurately called cash cams."

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the poorest parts of Chicago are where most of the city's cameras are located and, as a result, are hardest hit by the fines. Andriesen points out that nearly half the tickets issued to drivers in low-income neighborhoods were not paid on time; with late fees, those $35 tickets for barely speeding become $85 tickets.

Even before the cameras were tuned to target less dangerous drivers, the system was a regressive tax that fell most heavily on Chicago's poorest neighborhoods. A ProPublica analysis of the city's traffic cameras—including both speed cameras and it's corrupt red-light camera system—found that Chicago had generated over $500 million in 15 years from automatic tickets issued in predominantly black and Hispanic neighborhoods. Those fines contributed to "thousands of vehicle impoundments, driver's license suspensions, and bankruptcies," ProPublica found.

Unfortunately, some federal officials want to use Chicago's speed cameras as a model for the rest of the country.

As Reason's Julian Verdon reported in February, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg's new National Roadway Safety Strategy (NRSS) is promoting speed cameras nationwide as a "proven safety countermeasure" that can reduce fatal car crashes.

Never mind the fact that those cameras often fine the wrong vehicle and force falsely accused drivers to go through lengthy legal battles to avoid paying up. This is definitely all about highway safety, yup, which is exactly why the city of Chicago once got caught deliberately not sending notices to ticketed drivers so they could rack up additional late fees. And that's why the most notorious speed camera in Washington, D.C., is located in a "work zone" where there is usually not any road work taking place, allowing the city to double every fine.

Car crashes and traffic deaths might be up in Chicago since the city lowered the threshold for issuing speed tickets, but revenue is through the roof; perhaps the program is working exactly as intended.

NEXT: No, Palm Springs Isn’t Giving a Basic Income to Transgender and Nonbinary Residents

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. It’s only a minor inconvenience.

    1. Home income solution to enable everyone to work online and receive weekly payments to bank acc. Earn over $500 every day and get payouts every week straight to account bank. (ui55) My last month of income was $30,390 and all I do is work up to 4 hours a day on my computer. Easy work and steady income are great with this job.
      .
      More information. >> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/

  2. Be extremely careful when talking about Chicago. I learned in college "Chicago" (like "Baltimore" and "Detroit") is code for "Black people." Therefore all criticism of the city is racist.

    #BLM

    1. I'm pretty sure describing a black mayor setting up traffic cameras to tax black citizens unequally as 'rejiggering' is racist.

      1. True story. A number of years ago a friend, a helicopter mechanic in the Marines, ran into a problem where thy had to rename the tools they used to properly locate holes for rivets because "Drilling jig" was deemed racist.

        1. Like in history of the world part 1
          "the jig is up"
          "and gone"

        2. Just wait until these people find out about the most common type of picture puzzle...

  3. I ain't sayin' Lori Lightfoot's a gold digger, but...

    1. She is proof that human-alien hybrids are real.

    2. The regressive nature of the collections indicates that she is, indeed, messing with broke individuals.

      It probably is a lot of work making Kamala look classy though.

  4. It's a fee for living in Chicago.

  5. When you're paying off public employees for votes the money has to come from somewhere.

  6. And good luck to your attorney trying to subpoena the accuser you are constitutionally allowed to confront in court!

    So Mr. Robot-Camera, exactly where were you when you allegedly saw my client speeding?
    I'm sorry, I can't hear you, would you speak up please?
    Could you at least tell the court what was the color of the car my client was allegedly driving?
    I'm sorry, I can't hear you, would you speak up please?

    Your honor, I would like to have Mr. Robot-Camera declared a hostile witness; he is refusing to answer any of my questions.

    1. How these cameras have skirted constitutionality is a complete mystery to me. They ticket the owner of the vehicle, not the driver, which is not always the same thing (in both cases I've received the tickets in the mail, someone else was driving). This was on an interstate in Sioux City, IA, and no amount of my protestations of this violation, plus no ability to face my accuser, mattered. It would have cost more to hire a lawyer to fight the ticket than the fine itself. They've found the sweet spot. Bastards.

      1. "How these cameras have skirted constitutionality is a complete mystery to me."

        "It would have cost more to hire a lawyer to fight the ticket than the fine itself."

        You answered your own question. This will not be declared unconstitutional until the supreme court rules it is. (and that is not guaranteed)

        Maybe get a grant from the Gates foundation or the ACLU?

        1. This will not be declared unconstitutional until the supreme court rules it is.
          And the kind of people with the money to get it to the Supreme Court have the right connections, and would get the ticket dismissed.
          You lose, again prole.

        2. Institute for Justice might be a better bet.

  7. Automated customer service is a hell in and of it's self, but automated law enforcement is far worse.
    Slightly off topic I had to deal with some governmental agency here in Colorado because a camera license plate reader on a toll road misread someone else's number to be my license plate number. I received a bill in the mail for driving on a road that I did not, on a day that I did not. This is bovine feces at its finest. It's seriously is antithetical to any idea I have of justice.

  8. Come to Chicago, the city where if the residents don't shoot you, the government will rob you!

    Ever city needs a catchy phrase to get visitors to there city!

  9. These cameras are a problem easily fixed with 00 buckshot.

  10. The cameras are a terrible idea. Confronting your accuser and all that.

    "Minorities hardest hit" is not a libertarian angle, though.

  11. these cameras are unconstitutional. someone needs to sue the city.

  12. Why place more speed cams in poor neighborhoods? Is it because the cameras are placed on arterial roads, which were routed through those neighborhoods?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.