RIP Madeleine Albright, Who Escaped Both Fascism and Communism as a Child
The former secretary of state died today at the age of 84 after a long and complicated career in U.S. foreign policy.

Madeleine Albright, the first female U.S. secretary of state, died today at the age of 84. A longtime professor at Georgetown University and major adviser to Democratic politicians on foreign policy, Albright worked for nearly four decades in the academic and professional realms of international relations.
Originally from Czechoslovakia, Albright's family was forced to flee both fascism and communism before she turned 12. Her father's ties to the Czech democrats forced the family into exile following the 1938 Munich Agreement and Adolf Hitler's occupation of Czechoslovakia. They spent 10 days in hiding before leaving for Great Britain.
After working in Britain for the Czechoslovak government in exile, Albright's father eventually brought the family back to Prague once the war ended—only to leave again in 1948. An anti-communist, he was forced to resign from his government post after the Communist Party rose to power in Czechoslovakia.
Albright and her family eventually secured political asylum in the United States on the basis of her father's fear of being persecuted for his "faithful adherence to the ideals of democracy," as he put it. "Becoming a U.S. citizen is the most important thing that ever happened to me," Albright wrote in 2016. "Like all refugees, I shared a hope to live a safe life with dignity and a chance to give back to my new country."
Albright would inherit her father's distaste for authoritarianism of many forms, and her background as a refugee of the Eastern Bloc shaped her diplomatic efforts in the region following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. She held positions in some of America's highest offices of security and diplomacy, serving on the National Security Council, as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and eventually as secretary of state. In her many writings and speeches, she frequently warned against contempt in politics, aggression toward others, and demagoguery.
Like many who hold such powerful positions in government, her tenure as secretary of state was not free of controversy. Albright was a proponent of liberal internationalism and believed the U.S. was an "indispensable nation," justified to throw military force and harsh tactics behind diplomacy. Those beliefs undergirded her support for sanctions on Iraq—asked in 2001 about the reported half-million Iraqi children who had died as a result of American sanctions, she replied that "the price is worth it." She favored an active U.S. foreign policy and would eventually support American involvement in the Iraq War.
Her instincts played to interventionist tendencies in Washington, with implications that shape foreign policy debates to this day. "What's the use of having this superb military you're always talking about if we can't use it?" she once asked Secretary of State Colin Powell while debating the authorization of NATO airstrikes on Bosnia in 1993. She vociferously supported NATO's bombing of Yugoslavia, which transformed the alliance's prerogative from defensive actions into an offensive mission.
Still, Albright recorded a number of positive and truly impressive diplomatic milestones. Between 1997 and 2000, she engaged in a series of high-level exchanges with Iranian officials that would lead to the most significant (albeit fleeting) episode of detente between Washington and Tehran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. She was the first U.S. secretary of state to visit North Korea. She grappled assuredly with scores of world leaders, including autocrats like Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Albright's brand of liberal internationalism may not sit well with those who favor a less interventionist U.S. foreign policy. But her respect for human freedom is worth commemorating in the same breath as many of her diplomatic achievements, a value of a woman who rose to a position of immense power in the U.S. after fleeing two evil ideologies. "The magic of America is that we're a free and open society with a mixed population," Albright once said. "Part of our security is our freedom."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A strange statist subject for a libertarian obituary. There were probably thousands of Americans who fled both fascism and communism, and I bet most didn't enforce statism. Heck, why not Soros? He at least made a lot of money, even if corruption helped him. That's probably more libertarian than adulating a Secretary of State.
Please don’t use anything remotely resembling
“Adulterous “ with her.
I won't use "Adolphius" either, ok?
Libertarian moment!
Chuckie Koch loves him some Soros
The Butcher of Baghdad.
"the price, the price is worth it"
Easy to say that when they are not your (countries) children, I guess
'To the last bullet!', always issued by an officer nowhere near the front.
Case in point:
"Stalin issues Order No. 227—outlawing cowards"
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/stalin-issues-order-no-227outlawing-cowards
From which he wasn't shot.
Those beliefs undergirded her support for sanctions on Iraq—asked in 2001 about the reported half-million Iraqi children who had died as a result of American sanctions, she replied that "the price is worth it."
I guarantee none of my progressive friends will be bothered by this quote. Albright was a woman and a Democrat so she's almost as cool as Notorious RBG (just without the hip nickname).
#BrownLivesMatter
#(Sometimes)
Albright didn't rate an action figure, or any of the other kitschy garbage the allegedly superior and mature left/progressive cultish wackadoos have generated in bader ginsberg's likeness. Those were different times, and not that long ago.
Sanctions and trade embargo's are not an appropriate role of government. Let the market set the standard. What did starving and bombing Iraqi children accomplish? A puppet regime? Good for you!
It’s a good thing we don’t punish people for their rulers misdeeds anymore.
The idea that people are responsible for their rulers' misdeeds is the basis of the Social Justice concept.
Oh lookie here...
To regulate commerce with foreign nations..
Must of been a purpose for that.
As long as we live organized as nation states, I think sanctions and trade embargoes are an appropriate role for government against (and only against) countries we are at war with.
I've found most immigrants who can't leave the old world behind are the worst offenders of getting young American kids killed in foreign lands like the middle east. I do wonder her surprise to be greeted by Sadam in hell along with Trotsky and Hitler.
Eastern Europeans in particular seem to bring a strange brew of secularism, socialism and contempt for traditional American values like noninterventionism. "old world grudges" should be left in the old world.
Sorry Fiona...this woman had the blood of thousands on her hands..a truly evil and despicable person
Hear hear. Fiona Harrigan is a fascist cunt. Hope she dies of ovarian cancer.
Crikey, that's going too far. Albright is held up in the same way hillary is held up, They are both shitty role models for women, but did hold positions of prominence. Albright, not a positive, actually accomplished something as Secstate. If Harrigan looks at Albright as a possible or actual role model, so be it. But wishing death for that view is a bit much, I posit we stick to wishing death on spb2 or some other crappy member of the commentariat. For the children.
Politicians who stay mired within their own culture and ethnicity, rather than assimilating into US society, use the US military and the power of the US government to settle old scores and fight old battles.
Elian gonzalez says hi.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/fabiola-santiago/article76775897.html
Damn, that was a sad story all around! I loved the boy but didn't like what his real Father or State "Father" turned him into afterwards.
I had hoped in my heart of hearts that at least he would have tried escaping Cuba on his own when he got older.
Her advocacy of a policy that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands Iraqi babies far outweighs any good she may have done on the world stage.
I'm sure she'd approve:
https://twitter.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1506804366556151811?t=MwwuQBrGw96sz9D2aqwSVA&s=19
UK to provide 6,000 missiles to Ukraine in new support
Will also pay Ukrainian soldiers and pilots ***
REPEAT: WILL ALSO PAY THE UKRAINIAN ARMY TO FIGHT
I could care pess what Madelije Albright would approve of, but I do know that no one needs to pay the Ukrainians extra for what they are doing proudly and with gusto in defense of their homes and loved ones:
NATO Estrimates 7000 to 15,000 Russian Troops Have Been Killed In Ukraine
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nato-estimates-7000-to-15000-russian-troops-have-been-killed-in-ukraine/ar-AAVqiWs
The U.S took 20 years to loose 7000 in Afghanistan and Iraq combined and The Former Soviet Union took 10 years to lose 15,000 in Afghanistan!
This make Vladamir Putin not only evil to the Ukrainians, but evil to his fellow Russians, not to mention a military moron!
Looks like there could be another Coup d'Etat in Russia, only this time of more sensible minds against Putin and his Revanchist Repugniks and No-Good-Niks!
I'm having trouble believing any of those numbers. There's something incredibly 'off' about how this conflict is being reported.
Same here. The only thing we know for sure is that Zelenski could end this war tomorrow. The offer is on the table.
And that almost all "reporting" on this is a warmongering lie.
FoxNews is still talking about the "NYT reporter killed by Russians" even though we've known for over a week he wasn't with the NYT and he was killed by Ukrainians.
Shit like that just really has to make you suspicious of the entire product.
^^^This^^^
Solzhenitsyn talking about how they had no idea what was going on is as poignant today as is his line about not loving freedom enough.
All this noise in the media is a tactical diversion.
The war isn't for Europe being fought in Ukraine. The war is for the Middle East and the South China Sea and is being 'negotiated' by DC on behalf of Beijing.
Solzhenitsyn hated Western freedom for it's "liberal decadence" as much as he hated Communism and went back to Russia under Putin so, beyond his accounts of life in the Soviet Gulag, he was the one who had no idea what was going on.
And have you ever heqrd of a multi-front war? Right now, we're facing multiple enemies of freedom from all directions abroad, all emboldened by our lack of energy independence qnd lack of manufacturing edge all caused by our own government's infringements on economic frèedom.
We're only facing one, you globalist faggot.
You and your WEF masters.
Actually, Solzhenitsyn returned in the 90s, under Yeltsin.
Russia has suffered mass fatalities in war in the past by rulers who believed in throwing bodies at problems and who neglected to quartermaster their troops or give them an inspiring mission. Putin is cut from that same mold, so it's very credible.
No, Putin could end this at anytime by getting the fuck out of Ukraine. This is not hard.
You are, by far, one of the least intelligent posters at this site.
Bear in mind these are the same credulous faggots who said that the US mass-murdered half a million Iraqis in the first of the year invasion by counting every death in the entire country, including those caused by Islamic mass murders and terrorist bombings as US-caused casualties. The data only has to fit their ideology, not reality.
No, I am not one of those "credulous faggots." In fact, the Wiki page on Madeline Albright I linked disputes the authenticity of the U.S.-caused Iraqi civilian deaths, even though Albright was a calloused bloodthirsty bitch for saying the deaths were "the right decision.". Indeed, I think the past pages of Reason disputed the number of U.S.-caused casualties as well.
Oh, by the bye, Putin gave Saddam Hussein arms and military materiels, including very sophisticated range-finders for artillery and tanks.
Putin was seen at the Lincoln Memorial chanting 'Make America Great Again,' and smiling at a Native American elder and fake Vietnam war vet.
Correction: I could care less what Madeline Albright would approve of, though i could care pess too. Pess on Madeline Albright and Pess on Vladamir Putin too! Let's Go, Poontang!
Couldn't.
Right. 🙂
Christ, you're dumb.
Yeah, you love throwing Ukrainians into the meat grinder, for profit and political gain of Europe and the US. The US and Europe have no intention actually defending Ukraine.
Yeah, that sounds like a great idea: even more political instability in the country with the second largest number of nuclear weapons on the planet.
Morons like you will start WWIII.
Why do you care so much about what the UK does?
And yet you don't care that buying anything from Russia pays the Russian soldiers and pilots.
Money is fungible. Whether in trade or direct subsidies is no difference.
I doubt you're a Russian sock, you're too busy with all sorts of non-Russian topics, but you sure do have a weirdly consistent support for Russia in some ways, and not related to just what the US does. Why care about the UK?
THERE IS LITERALLY NO REASON TO BE ALARMED THAT THE 6TH LARGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD AND A NATO MEMBER IS DIRECTLY PAYING THE SALARIES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL IN A FOREIGN LAND.
I remember the good old days when libertarians and the radical left (but I repeat myself) were known as the "blame America first" pacifists and it was religious conservatives who were gung-ho to go commit atrocities in foreign countries to stick it to the dirty Rooskies.
They're still "blame America first" except when it comes to warmongering for conflict with the anti-globalist nation in control of more nuclear weapons than anybody else.
Gotta defend that taxpayer $ stealing, laundering pit known as Ukraine at all costs.
Saint John McCain would be so very proud of some of our posters here.
Seriously dude, I understand you get a kick out of taking the opposite of the "conventional" view as a substitute for actually thinking for yourself, but that doesn't give you the right to criticize others who did analyze this on their own terms and came to the obviously correct conclusion that Ukraine is in the right here.
Do you actually believe that sending in defense is "warmongering" and straight up invading a nation with zero provocation isnt "warmongering"? I'm really confused as to how any honest thinker would arrive at that conclusion.
Expropriating UK tax payers to pay for a war that the UK has no stake or part in? That seems like a fundamental violation of libertarian principles to me.
I object to governments taking tax dollars to support foreign wars. Any government. Any foreign war.
I don't object to private citizens trading with countries that aren't threatening us or donating their money to foreign war efforts that we don't have a stake in.
"RIP Madeleine Albright, Who Escaped Both Fascism and Communism as a Child"
Goody for her, but promoting wars suggests she didn't learn anything.
Betting the gray box above is the braindead asshole nardz now claiming that Albright is the cause of NK's nuclear efforts.
Instead of guessing you could just read his posts if you're that obsessed by him. Or if you don't want to read his posts, you could just mute him and then stop obsessing about what he is saying and projecting your own neurotic shit onto others. Or you could just keep being an ignorant, vile, warmongering fascist cocksucking faggot bitch with 3 feet of Ukrainian cock down your throat. Gee, I wonder which option you'll pick.
To be someone who lived under Nazism and Communism, Madeline Albright sure didn't learn shit about either Nazism or Communism.
I mean, just read her record:
Madeline Albright--Wikipedia
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madeleine_Albright
She didn't acknowledge Rwanda as a genocide until she couldn't avoid it, she condemned a Congressional Resolution acknowledging and condemning Ottoman Turkey's genocide against Armenians (This genocide is what helped inspired Adolf Hitler with the idea that it was possible to murder off whole groups of people. Just before getting his piece of the Poland he shared with Stalin, Hitler rhetorically asked: "Who will remember the annihilation of the Armenians?"
Also, Madeline Albright used hateful rhetoric against Serbians in the Yugoslavian Civil War and also visited and gave imprimateur to North Korea's Dictator Kim Jong-Il and helped them get access to nuclear reactor technology.
Yeah, fuck this bitch...with Creepy Joe's dick!
exactly she gave N. Korea Billions to stop threatening S Korea and all they did was build more nuclear weapons. And guess what Biden is doing the exact same thing for Iran these people are idiots or they are our own enemy within.
"Also, Madeline Albright used hateful rhetoric against Serbian"
Seriously? The Serbs were in the process of genociding a bunch of Muslims. That was the cause of the invasion. Albright can be criticized for many things but this is a rather stupid one.
She once called a group of Serbs at a book signing "disgusting Serbs"
One of the 5 worst SecStates in history, and the American most largely responsible for the Ukraine war today
It's a shame she won't be around to enjoy the world war she did so much to instigate.
Ding dong the warmongering fascist cunt is dead. May the bodies of the millions of people she got killed haunt her into eternity if there is such a thing.
It's a pity there is no hell for her to go to.
Now, if only the Obamas, the Clintons and the Bushs will follow her to their own graves.
Hopefully she doesn't run into any of those "disgusting Serbs" she hated so much, while she's in hell.
Albright would inherit her father's distaste for authoritarianism of many forms,
I would find that a bit more believable if she hadn't chosen to be a Democrat.
Let's all not forget "What's the point of having this superb military that you're always talking about if we can't use it?" Yeah, real libertarian stalwart there. When your outlook is enough to make even Colin Powell cringe in horror for using U.S. servicemen and women as "toy soldiers", maybe you're not the best example of distaste for authoritarianism.
Very true.
Militaries to rqtional people are like insurance policies: A bitter necessity to pay for in a dangerous world, but one you hope you'll never have to use. Madeline Albright just didn't get that.
https://twitter.com/aimeeterese/status/1506958184950693893?t=DDq3A1w0lv-Go9IdTOBccg&s=19
When did Obama become a biologist?
[Link]
And who is, at least partially responsible for the deaths of 500,000 children in Iraq.....but it was worth it.
So let me conclude here, that in order to remove Joe Biden from office, at least half a million American children need to die in order to do so.
The foreign policy mistakes made by that charlatan, liar and fraud not to mention grifter has led to on of the worst disasters for America, especially for the people of Iraq who continue to suffer from the Obama/Hillary regime's reckless interventionism.
It's a pity there is no hell for her to go to.
See the Wiki page for Madeoine Aobright above. The numbers of Iraqi children dead caused by the U.S. are in dispute, but Albright was still a stupid bitch to think that their deaths were "the right decision."
I've looked into the numbers myself and interestingly the number of deaths year to year of adults and children did not vary much from non sanction years to sanction years and even war years
"not without controversy"
JFC. This fucking murderous ghoul is dead and Reason writes a obit that glosses over her crimes ? amazing.
shame. you'd think someone who escaped all that would be more on the supply side of peace
Good riddance to an odious, amoral apparatchik.
-jcr
War criminals receive more favorable coverage from Reason than right-wing critics of Big Tech.
Madeleine Albright: authoritarian statist, imperialist, and war monger. Good riddance.