Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Lowest-Income Taxpayers Are the Most Likely To Be Audited

Plus: North Carolina rescinds FART license plate, permit-free concealed carry gets OK in Ohio, COVID case counts rising again, and more...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 3.15.2022 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
ipurestockxfour192769 | Ingram Publishing/Newscom
(Ingram Publishing/Newscom)

IRS audits target the poor. Data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University shows the IRS audited the lowest-income Americans—"wage earners with less than $25,000 in total gross receipts"—at five times the rate of everyone else during government fiscal year 2021.

"A large increase in federal income tax audits targeting the poorest wage earners allowed the Internal Revenue Service to keep overall audit numbers from further declines for Americans as a whole," TRAC reports.

It's another sign that the Biden administration's plan to beef up IRS funding, hire more than 80,000 new tax cops, and increase monitoring of cash flow into and out of bank accounts could harm the Americans who are just barely scraping by, not only ultra-wealthy tax cheats, as officials say.

In 2021, the IRS conducted 306,944 audits of the lowest-income earners and 352,059 audits of people of all other income levels, according to TRAC. Just 39,449 audits were of people with taxable incomes between $200,000 and $1 million per year.

Put another way, high-income earners had one-third the odds of an audit compared with their low-income counterparts. Only 4.5 out of every 1,000 returns of the $200,000-to-$1 million bracket were audited, compared to 13 out of every 1,000 returns of the lowest-income bracket.

The audit rate for all earners with positive incomes over $25,000 was just 2.6 per 1,000 returns.

"IRS accomplished over 650 thousand audits last year by jacking up its already high reliance on so called 'correspondence audits'—essentially a letter from the IRS asking for documentation on a specific line item on a return," notes TRAC. And "over half of these correspondence audits were targeted at the small proportion of workers with incomes so low they had claimed an anti-poverty earned tax credit to offset the tax otherwise due on their modest earned income."

Fifty-four percent of correspondence audits were aimed at "the small proportion of returns with gross receipts of less than $25,000 claiming an earned income tax credit."

"Does it make sense from either an equity or revenue standpoint to focus IRS's limited firepower on the poorest taxpayers among us—those with incomes so low they have filed returns claiming an anti-poverty earned income tax credit?" TRAC asks. "This question alone raises profound issues.


FREE MINDS

State rescinds FART license plate. Though North Carolina initially approved a "FART" license plate for Asheville resident Karly Sindy, it threatened to rescind the plate after three months when someone complained.

When the state "told her she had to remove the plate unless she could make a convincing case to keep it," Sindy "created a website for an organization named the Friends of Asheville Recreational Trails. They held their very first meeting that night," notes Jeremy Markovich in the North Carolina Rabbit Hole newsletter:

Fifteen people showed up. Soon after, people made logos, and the story got a ton of media coverage. Sindy herself ended up on Jimmy Kimmel Live! to plead her case to America. She also mailed an appeal to the DMV, saying FART the plate represented F.A.R.T. the hiking group.

Well, it turns out that Sindy won't be able to keep the plate on her truck after all. Yesterday afternoon, she got a call from the NCDMV saying her appeal was denied.

"Ms. Sindy will not be able to keep the plate on her vehicle," NCDOT spokesman Marty Honan said in an email to the Rabbit Hole. "The text has been on our unapproved list for some time and should not have been issued."

The decision is at odds with a federal court holding that license plates are free speech. In 2020, a federal court held that California's ban on plates with "connotations offensive to good taste and decency" was unconstitutional—paving the way for QUEER and SLAAYRR license plates.


FREE MARKETS

Permit-free concealed carry OK in Ohio. Republican Gov. Mike DeWine has signed into law a bill that will allow concealed carry weapons without a permit. More from The Columbus Dispatch:

Senate Bill 215 will let Ohio residents 21 and older conceal firearms they are legally allowed to own without training or permits. It also removed the legal requirement for gun owners to tell police they are armed when stopped. Law enforcement will have to ask, but lying about a concealed weapon will be a misdemeanor offense.

"This is a day that will go down in history…," Buckeye Firearms Association Director Dean Rieck said in a statement. "This is a great moment for Ohio and for those who wish to more fully exercise their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms."

DeWine's decision to sign the bill into law came over objections from law enforcement groups, county sheriffs and Democrats who worried that taking away training requirements would make communities less safe.


QUICK HITS

NEW: We've just released the 2022 edition of Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie - the most comprehensive, up-to-date view of who is locked up in the U.S., where, and why: https://t.co/WH2BPEBCS6

This report shows huge drops in prison and jail populations. Why? Thread. pic.twitter.com/karkyyQ3xH

— Prison Policy Init. (@PrisonPolicy) March 14, 2022

• COVID cases are rising again in parts of Asia and Europe. "The death rate in Hong Kong has soared this month, surpassing 25 per 100,000 residents in the past week," notes David Leonhardt at The New York Times. "Covid is also spreading rapidly in New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and several other Pacific countries that had previously kept caseloads low." And European countries including the U.K., Germany, and Italy are also seeing rising case rates, attributed largely to a rise in omicron subvariant BA.2.

COVID update: Based on European case increases, the US could see a new rise in COVID cases over the Spring.

The wave is likely to look different in several ways. 1/

— Andy Slavitt ???????? ???????? (@ASlavitt) March 14, 2022

• Timothy B. Lee at Full Stack Economics on oil and inflation: "The US has had seven recessions in the last 50 years. Four of these—in 1973, 1980, 1981, and 1990—were preceded by conflicts in the Middle East that disrupted oil supplies and drove up oil prices. Two others—in 2001 and 2007—followed oil price increases driven by strong demand rather than supply disruptions."

• "The three former Sharon Hill police officers who opened fire at an Academy Park High School football game in August, killing an 8-year-old girl, were held for trial Thursday on criminal charges relating to her death," reports The Philadelphia Inquirer.

• Freddie de Boer on demographic averages, identity politics, and maddening contradictions. "If you want to discourage projecting averages onto individuals, you should do that with all kinds of people" and not just when it's convenient for progressive politics, he writes. "If the idea is that we should pay a lot less attention to demographic identity because these groupings always distort who we are as individuals, I say, yeah! I'm on board. But that attitude usually offends the social justice set."

• Massachusetts is revising down its COVID death count. The state "will start using a new public health surveillance definition next week that will result in 4,081 deaths once linked to the virus being recategorized as stemming from other causes," NBC 10 Boston reports.

• A look inside America's first official safe injection site.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Biden Has His Eye on Bitcoin

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupIRSTaxesIncome taxTaxpayersAuditLaw enforcement
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (341)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    IRS audits target the poor.

    If they didn't want to be audited maybe they should be rich enough to have connections.

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Why bother auditing someone who uses a good accounting firm?

      1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

        That is where the real money is.... 🙂

        1. Social Justice is neither   3 years ago

          Not by volume or expense.

          1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

            So I make myself understood (just want to be clear): The wealthy and corporations are where the money is. The cost in going after them is substantial, and time-consuming. In fact, they depend on that.

            The behavior would change if we had a 'Loser Pays' provision in tax disputes, where the losers pay legal, court and associated costs and penalties in their final disposition. That would take away the incentive over time to draw out the proceedings. Hit someone like Bezos for 5MM, it means nothing. But 50MM or 500MM, then they pay attention and walk a narrower line, legally.

            Going after EITC recipients is understandable, but just a drop in the bucket. We can debate separately whether we want a wealth transfer program (which is what EITC is).

            1. Illocust   3 years ago

              Likely would drag out the proceedings longer not shorter. Why capitulate when the IRS gets it wrong if you can get all your legal fees for free. IRS rules are contradictory and they will often give you two different on the record answers to the same question. A good team of lawyers will have their lunch at court.

              1. Rich   3 years ago

                IRS rules are contradictory and they will often give you two different on the record answers to the same question.

                However, the agents who provide those different answers are both fired, right? RIGHT?!

                1. Longtobefree   3 years ago

                  Left, actually.

                  1. Ollie R. Pennington   3 years ago

                    I have just received $30,850 of my last month working and i was doing this in my part time online. jkl I joined this 4 months before and i know how easy this job is to make money online.
                    …
                    Join this website ==> http://workhere3.blogspot.com/

              2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

                You guys are arguing like the key IRS audit metric is money or, gasp, profit. What if they score themselves on things like number of cases, or even number of penalty outcomes?

                1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

                  The cynic in me says the inter-office competition is for the greatest number of suicides by persons under audit.

              3. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

                Right...to address that I would like to see 'Loser Pays' legislation for Tax Court. I am Ok with reasonable, good faith interpretations of a law. That should not be penalized. However, I would not allow litigants to claim legal expenses from the government unless malfeasance can be shown. That is a fine line.

                I don't like paying taxes any more than anyone else. But it really pisses me off when the government is cynically manipulated and the net effect is to screw the people the government is set up to help. That, I don't like at all.

                1. defaultdotxbe   3 years ago

                  "Loser pays" would just hurt the poor even more, because it means they are out even more money if they fail to prove a case just because they don't have a dedicated accountant tracking every reciept.

                  Also, targeting EITC is more than just a drop in the bucket. Sure, maybe you can get $500MM from one Jeff Bezos, but you can also get $100 from each of 5 million EITC recipients, and they are much less likely to fight it even without a "loser pays" provision (it just gets deducted from their next refund).

                  Point is, as long as taxes exist the government will always squeeze the poor more than the rich, because it will always be easier

                  1. Square = Circle   3 years ago

                    Point is, as long as taxes exist the government will always squeeze the poor more than the rich, because it will always be easier

                    ^

                    With the clarification that, as any SimCity player knows, your real tax base is the middle class. The people who have enough to meaningfully take but not enough to defend themselves.

                    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

                      Historically true, though the trend is toward the upper middle and top earners in recent years. What with 40% of all taxes coming from the top 1%, and the top 1/4 of earners paying close to 90% of all tax.

                    2. defaultdotxbe   3 years ago

                      The top 1/4 of earners includes a significant chunk what is generally considered the middle class. Subtracting the 40% paid by the 1% means the upper middle class pays 50% of all taxes. The rest of the middle class probably pays most or all of the remaining 10%, for close to 60% of all taxes coming from the middle class. Just look at the tax rates in any European country, the top brackets start near the middle of the middle class

                    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

                      Historically true, though the trend is toward the upper middle and top earners in recent years.

                      With inflation, we're going to have to redefine what Upper Middle and Top Earner really is. Vail just passed a $20/hr minimum wage for worker bees. Meanwhile, if you make in the $110K-$130K range in the Denver area, you're probably house-poor if you just moved there or are a longer resident who just bought your house in the last couple of years (Front Range average home price now: $700K. Fuck that noise).

                2. Its_Not_Inevitable   3 years ago

                  "the people the government is set up to help." You mean the people that bribe...errr...payoff...errr...contribute to the politicians and bureaucrats, right?

            2. KeninTX   3 years ago

              The article glosses over 'negative tax payers' - nearly half if all tax filings result in net payments to taxpayers in excess of any taxes collected from them.

              I think people that submit filings that result in no or negative taxes owed deserve greater scrutiny than those whose filings are supported by employer reports to the IRS.

        2. Bluwater   3 years ago

          When it comes to IRS audits, the auditors have a different agenda than the government. The government wants revenue, but the IRS, and particularly the auditors want closed cases and don't give a damn about the actual revenue. It's how things are counted there.

          As an auditor, maybe you pull a case that will require 500 man-hours, so that's 1/4 of your year and at the end of the case. Either way, it's a shit-storm, complicated, and your stats suck. They would much rather pull a case that is simple and will require 1-2 man-hours. The chances are that the latter won't fight, and the auditor gets to move on quickly and no matter the final result.
          The lower the income, the more likely it is that just the idea of an audit will be more intimidating and therefore result in no fight.

      2. JesseAz   3 years ago

        One of the primary forms of fraud is child tax credit. Low income communities often declare the same child on multiple forms or invent children. It is a simple and easy audit to fix. Why it is one of the first ones looked at.

        1. defaultdotxbe   3 years ago

          That's why prior to the 1980s it was unusual for a child to be issued a social security number (you usually got one issued when you got your first job and started paying into the system)

          Now though you need an SSN for each child you claim on your taxes, so people get them issued as soon as possible for a child. That, along with everything being computerized, has cut down the ability to invent children, or claim them twice, because the system will flag an invalid or duplicate SSN on a return before even issuing a refund

          1. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

            Both me and my brother were issued social security cards when we were born in the 1970s, but that may have been because we were born in military hospitals, and our father was a serviceman. Can't do anything back then without a social security number.

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

              We're about the same age, and I was also born in a military hospital, but I didn't get my SS card until my mid-teens when I started job hunting. Maybe it just boiled down to whether people took the initiative to do it or not.

        2. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

          It's racist to know all of your children

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

            "Parenting" is white privilege.

    2. Nardz   3 years ago

      Heads+pikes

    3. Enjoy Every Sandwich   3 years ago

      Typical Big Government; the poor can't effectively fight back so of course it picks on them.

    4. Moonrocks   3 years ago

      That's literally the point. The whole point is to punish the peasants, not to inconvenience the aristocrats.

      1. KeninTX   3 years ago

        The "aristocrats" have the lions share of their income automatically reported to the government by their employer, cheating on income at the "aristocrat" income levels is much more complex than it is for workers working "under the table", which tends to be in the lower income levels.

        If I told you 50% of wait staff workers under-report their tip earnings (a made-up number), wouldn't that be a valid basis to focus on tax filings from wait staff workers?

        I have no trouble believing that at certain lower-income levels there is a great temptation to 'check the wrong box' or overstate a deduction to get a bigger tax refund, so it isn't automatically wrong to disproportionately review/audit their returns.

    5. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      What if low-income earners turn out to be cheating on their tax returns at higher rates, though? And higher-income earners actually successfully file their taxes and have fewer incentives to cheat?

    6. CE   3 years ago

      Probably looking for COVID relief fraud.

      But we knew the 87,000 new IRS agents (who said Biden didn't create lots of new high-paying jobs with great benefits?) wouldn't be going after the 614 billionaires in the US, since they can afford the best tax attorneys.

      1. CE   3 years ago

        And unreported cryptocurrency capital gains.

      2. defaultdotxbe   3 years ago

        Of course not, the new agents will be going after people who earn $600 per year via Venmo and CashApp

    7. soldiermedic76   3 years ago

      Probably a function of doing taxes yourself or paying a professional to do them for you.

      1. markm23   3 years ago

        I've been doing my own taxes since 1973 (manually for about 20 years, and using mass-markets software ever since) and never been audited. But I'm honest, and I'm good at math - two traits that help one rise out of the lowest income bracket.

    8. EISTAU Gree-Vance   3 years ago

      Everything is so terrible and unfair.

    9. freedomwriter   3 years ago

      Just believe the opposite of what leaders say.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    It's another sign that the Biden administration's plan to beef up IRS funding, hire more than 80,000 new tax cops, and increase monitoring of cash flow into and out of bank accounts could harm the Americans who are just barely scraping by...

    Well, it was never going to be Nancy Pelosi getting scrutinized.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      The Neo-Democrats continue to act more openly as the party of the elite left. Who knew that Diversity means rich liberals, suburban women, and POCs (at least the ones that behave like proper peasants).

  3. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    ...it threatened to rescind the plate after three months when someone complained.

    She who smelt it...

    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

      ill admit the majority of times I see reason cover a silly headline the only thought in my head is "what's fist going to do with this"

      1. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

        Sorry to disappoint on this one.

        1. R Mac   3 years ago

          Why? That was one of your juicier comments yet!

    2. CE   3 years ago

      Something stinks about this.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Permit-free concealed carry OK in Ohio.

    There's going to be an uptick in gun violence in Ohio because of this. IT'S INEVITABLE SO DON'T BOTHER CHECKING STATS LATER.

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Everyone will be dead.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

        Are they still COVID deaths?

        1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

          They'll simultaneously be COVID deaths and Gun Violence deaths.

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            With a dash of white supremacy.

            1. Ska   3 years ago

              White supremacy is the bland of life.

    2. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

      I want to believe that trope has gotten pretty worn by now.

      Criminals already enjoy virtual "constitutional carry." This only allows non criminals the same liberty.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        Yeah, but they hold their guns sideways.

        1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

          they hold their guns sideways.

          So if I stand up to them, they shoot my wife standing next to me? That would actually get me to give up my wallet.

          1. KAR-en   3 years ago

            You won’t discuss religion. You’ll just force your DISPROVEN beliefs and lifestyle down everyone else’s throats.

            You Perv worshippers are too arrogant and stupid to realize how many people you’ve fucked.

            If you were smart(you aren’t) you’d circle the wagons in your theocratic shithole Utah.

            People are waking up to what scumbags you are. Be afraid magic underwear boy!

            1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

              That's magic underwear man to you, little dude.

              1. KAR-en   3 years ago

                Mormon men are cowards.

                1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

                  Obviously frustrated and prejudiced recreants who name people cowards without context or substantiation anonymously on the internetz are not going to make anyone quake in their boots. It evokes more pity than anger and no fear whatsoever.

                  I do have an intense, irrational terror that you might share your opinions with the Beaverton police department. I would probably shit myself if I thought that you were going to go down in person and let them know what kind of person they had working for them. They might even cancel his pension and leave his family destitute. Knowing that I revealed the religion he kept secret from his brothers in blue would haunt me forever. Please whatever you do, don't contact the Beaverton police. Please!

                  1. KAR-en   3 years ago

                    I don’t see how the Beaverton police could SWAT a pay phone by Lloyd Center. They have no jurisdiction, and the Pigs in Multnomah county are too busy hanging out with their Patriot Prayer Pals.

                    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

                      Thank goodness. It's the PDX metro area, so they fully expect that anonymous pussies will call in and slander their brave officers. No chance they look into it.

                      If you were to go there in person to make sure that a detective gets the story first hand, I would have to kill myself. Again, I am begging you not to do that! Please! Think of the widow and her kids!

                    2. KAR-en   3 years ago

                      Why would anything happen to me if I complained in person? I’m not breaking any laws.

                      Are you suggesting the pigs in Beaverton would violate my civil rights just like your Mormon pal did to other non-Mormons?

                    3. KAR-en   3 years ago

                      Do you want me to complain in person so you can “out me” to my family, friends, and employer?

                      They already know I hate Mormons. They’re on my side(well not my employer, but just cuz they can’t) and will back me up.

                      I’ve told them all about my experience with Mormons… and I can be very, very persuasive!

                      So, like ya know, leave your church! I’ll be your friend!

    3. Longtobefree   3 years ago

      WHAT!!??
      Exercise a constitutional right without a permission slip??!!
      HOW DARE YOU!

  5. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    ...objections from law enforcement groups, county sheriffs and Democrats who worried that taking away training requirements would make communities less safe.

    I mean, just look at Ohio law enforcement to see the benefits of training.

  6. Social Justice is neither   3 years ago

    Why is it an issue to audit the free money given out by the government for nothing over those protecting the money they earned from the greedy, irresponsible clutches of the government?

  7. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

    Obama gets the coof.

    “A vaccinated and sophisticated crowd”.

    1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

      Must mask the serfs harder!

    2. Enjoy Every Sandwich   3 years ago

      Obviously a deliberate attack by those terrible anti-vaxxers!

      Heh, you know some unhinged commenter is gonna say it.

    3. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

      it's Trump's fault obviously.

  8. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    "Lowest-Income Taxpayers Are the Most Likely To Be Audited"

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    The Democratic Party of decades past — back when they actually represented the working class — would be absolutely furious about this. Contemporary Dems, OTOH, are much more focused on promoting neopronouns and critical race theory in public schools.

    I swear, using "social issues" to fundamentally transform the Democratic Party was the smartest thing the progressive / libertarian alliance ever did. 🙂

    #VoteDemocratToSpiteTheWorkingClass

    1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      Yeah, but inflation.

      1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

        I haven't been keeping up, is inflation still not happening or is it now happening but it's Putin's Inflation?

        1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

          We better ask this guy for the right answer

          https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1503381029448564745

          1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

            Funny shit right there.

            1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

              Funny, sad.

        2. CE   3 years ago

          It's happening, but it's a good thing, because people will chew less tobacco.

        3. JimboJr   3 years ago

          Now that they can shift blame to Putin, its absolutely real, we care about it, and it is a horrible problem affecting all Americans.

          Unlike a month ago, when it was either not real, not a big deal, or actually a good thing.

    2. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

      This is one of your best; my compliments to your panel of immigrant talent, by the way [and yes this includes Shikha D]!

      1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

        Yeah, OBL is a national treasure. I have laughed so hard at some of zer posts I have cried.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    COVID cases are rising again in parts of Asia and Europe.

    Ouch for Ukraine.

    1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

      Not if it's Omicron. Seasonal cold is worse.

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

        "Soaring" at a death rate of .00025%.

        SMH...again.

        1. Rich   3 years ago

          "Oh, very well. 'Spiking', then."

  10. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

    Ha! More Covid Craziness from ENB = her latest ort and dropping over yet another 'new' variant.

    How much money would you like to wager that ENB will be a proponent for mass covid shutdowns to occur after Labor Day (before the election, obviously)?

    1. Nardz   3 years ago

      Already being set up in China.

    2. Zeb   3 years ago

      Was she a proponent of any mass shutdowns? They were pretty bad as questioning a lot of covid nuttiness, but I don't recall anyone ever actually supporting or promoting forced shutdowns.

  11. BillyG   3 years ago

    "Does it make sense from either an equity or revenue standpoint to focus IRS's limited firepower on the poorest taxpayers among us—those with incomes so low they have filed returns claiming an anti-poverty earned income tax credit?" TRAC asks. "This question alone raises profound issues.

    I have to provide full documentation to the IRS for my taxes & deductions. Why should someone claiming the most error prone portion of the tax code get to skip out?

    1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      BillyG, I get what you are saying. This EITC is literally a wealth transfer system. So you'd think it would make a lot of sense to really eyeball WTF is happening to that money. I get it.

      Think about who get EITC, and their cognitive ability to address an IRS correspondence audit (and having organized documentation). You see the problem here?

      I don't think expanding the size of the IRS is the answer here.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        So just give dummies money?

        1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

          Sigh....I would phrase it differently Dlam!.

          I would phrase it this way: The IRS has finite resources vis a vis enforcement. The resources need to be concentrated where the payoff is largest, as opposed to case closure rate. I was once given wonderful 'life' advice from a prostitute. She said, "Honey, always get the money first". She was right (and unforgettable in her own right). The IRS needs to get the money first.

          The money is not with EITC recipients. The 'real money' is with the uber-wealthy and corporation with their phalanxes of lawyers and accountants. Vigorous enforcement will change their ethically questionable behavior over time.

          1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

            Are you saying the accounting firms for the big money boys are violating their code of ethics and cheating on behalf of their clients?

            1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

              A few do. That is a fact. The vast majority of accounting firms are honest.

              Dlam!, I'd say that the line is somewhere between what is a 'reasonable' statutory interpretation and what is a 'plausible' statutory interpretation of a tax law. The ones who wind up in the slammer invariably opt for 'plausible' interpretations of tax law and then push the limits on statutory interpretation.

              Ultimately, this is on the Legislature to fix: Draft better laws.

            2. markm23   3 years ago

              I wouldn't expect actual tax fraud from the big accounting firms, but I would expect them to know all those areas where you can ask 3 different IRS agents and get 3 different answers and use whichever is most favorable to their client, and sometimes 3 different interpretations for 3 different client. That's what the rich hire them for.

              But going after these cases is expensive for the IRS. The other thing the rich hire big accounting for is throw a phalanx of top-notch lawyers at the IRS whenever it questions anything about their returns.

          2. BillyG   3 years ago

            As you say, the resources need to be concentrated where there's the highest payoff. Anything with a high Return on Investment should be pursued.

            Consider the resources being used in these cases. It's a form letter asking for a specific piece of information. This isn't a full blown audit going through everything line by line. It's asking for missing documentation. This requires little resources and can be largely automated. That's a high return for little work.

      2. Longtobefree   3 years ago

        How smart do you have to be to say "the free IRS software claimed the credit for me"?
        Based on the steep decline in eraser sales, no one is doing taxes on paper anymore. There are too many 'free' web sites that do simple (aka low income renter) tax return just for giving them you financial data. Those programs look at age and income from wages and claim the credit if you meet the rules. The only documentation you need are W-2s and a birth certificate.

    2. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

      Properly, IRS should scrutinize everyone but target no-one.

      Preferably, there is no IRS and taxes only are collected on purchases.

      1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

        Yeah, I would love a consumption based taxation system, too. I think it is more fair, ultimately.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

          Head tax, payable in cash or labor.

          Make it very clear what "civilization" costs.

          1. BillyG   3 years ago

            That'd be one way to shrink the budget.

            Consumption tax would be more feasible.

        2. Joe Friday   3 years ago

          I would think the IRS scrutinizes outlier returns as a means of wisely using it's own resources, and from that would emphasize those with the most serious possible benefit to the treasury. They don't have enough resources to look at everyone.

          1. JesseAz   3 years ago

            They use automated systems for basic audits to check against w2s and multiple claims of dependant dummy.

      2. R Mac   3 years ago

        What ever happened to The Fairtax? Or Neal Bortz?

        1. Longtobefree   3 years ago

          "Cancel culture" means different things to different people.

    3. Minadin   3 years ago

      Typically, if you don't itemize, you aren't required to produce the paperwork forms. But you are required to keep them on file in case they ask for them.

      Notable exceptions to itemization being some of the new tax credits like the EITC, that child tax credit, and student load interest deductions. Also I think the SALT deduction back when that was around.

    4. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      Should be really be examining this from an equity standpoint? What if those people are just routinely lying and cheating at much higher rates than the general population?

  12. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

    Lancet reports 18million excess deaths worldwide 2020-21. 6 million are attributed to Covid... (But any nation actually conducting death certificate audits has found that 3%-5% died OF Covid.)

    That means there were 12m excess deaths worldwide last year not related to Covid, probably more.

    I don't think you can attribute that all to missed doctor visits. (I attribute it to an experimental gene therapy proven to cause a diverse and sometimes fatal set of side effects (1,291 recorded flavors) that has been shown repeatedly to have a roughly 20% increase in all-cause illness and mortality in test subjects over control...)

    What is not a matter of my speculation is that the US' death rate is up there with undeveloped nations, and that is fucking shameful, and a clear sign that repressing treatment options to favor a singular licensed product is amoral and idiotic.

    1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

      Lancet link, clicked submit too soon.

      https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02796-3/fulltext

    2. Nardz   3 years ago

      https://twitter.com/EthicalSkeptic/status/1503515269955735554?t=3VD4RsG7BGvqiPmB9ixx_A&s=19

      I sorted and parsed 730 types of death in order to assemble this profile of 25 - 34 year olds - and the ultimate death codes which were feeding this 2021/22 rise.

      If you are at the CDC and you have been watching this curve, it is time to step up. The universe is watching...

      [Graph]

      1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

        He corrected to 25-54 range, but it mirrors data parsed by Edward Dowd and others - deaths rose dramatically AFTER the jab, and as Covid evolved to less severe but more transmissible variants.

        1. Nardz   3 years ago

          Thanks, meant to note the correction to 25-54 range.

          Very troubling/suspicious development.

        2. JesseAz   3 years ago

          Also DMED.

    3. CE   3 years ago

      A very low percentage of the excess deaths are from vaccine side effects. Mostly they are "deaths of despair" due to increased depression, anxiety, and isolation from being locked down, with the associated increase in drug abuse and risky behavior (rioting, driving too fast, robbing stores, etc.)

      These are all costs of the lockdown, but won't be subtracted from the supposed gains in lives saved.

      1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

        Bullshit. There has not been waves of suicides anywhere but in the veteran community after we left Afghanistan.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Four of these—in 1973, 1980, 1981, and 1990—were preceded by conflicts in the Middle East that disrupted oil supplies and drove up oil prices.

    That's why we all need to go to green energy. Nothing bad can happen when we rely on Chinese lithium refineries and an outdated domestic power grid.

    1. Rich   3 years ago

      LOL 8-(

    2. BillyG   3 years ago

      You forgot Chinese Slavery Panels.
      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-57124636

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

      If by nothing bad you exclude sitting at home in the dark waiting for the National Guard to deliver your ration of government cheese, then sure.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        You think they’ll deliver your cheese? You’ll have to walk to the cheese distribution center and wait in line like everyone else.

        1. ElvisIsReal   3 years ago

          You think there will be cheese?

          1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   3 years ago

            "Cheese food product"

    4. CE   3 years ago

      We can all sit around telling stories between 4 and 9 PM, when renewable energy is less available, to strengthen our communities. Maybe while huddling around a campfire if the windmills are frozen.

  14. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

    Since the new tax regs went into effect in 2018, a lot more people are filing the "short form" as the standard deduction significantly increased, and the threshold for itemizing is much higher. A lot less people are no longer going to be claiming things like mortgage interest, charitable contributions, job related costs etc.

    So you get audited, and you bring in your form and your W2s, and ask what about it. All the more so if you are in the lower income category.

    Sounds like a regular bureaucratic boondoggle.

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      They said more audits, nothing about more recoveries of funds.

    2. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      I gotta be honest. I used to itemize. I live in the People's Republic of NJ and the property tax subsidy write-off was wonderful. And the things you could do with charitable donations and receipts and miscellaneous write-offs. I mean, I spent weeks (2-3) documenting everything. And got back a few grand.

      The 2017 tax law was a gamechanger for me. I now spend 4 hours doing my taxes. It is soooo much better. I just take the standard deduction and bing-bang-boom....file electronically. I pay my taxes with a visa card that gets me 2% back and feel so much less stress. I am not wasting weeks going through receipts.

      1. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

        Ditto; if I paid a couple thousand a month in mortgage interest or owned rental property [as I did in the past] different story; now I am not into that and it is a lot less stressful and time consuming. And I no longer pay an accountant to figure it all out for me.

        If they want to audit me I toss out my W-2s and standard tax form and say have fun.

  15. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/KurtSchlichter/status/1503567591482134531?t=8pmh3-yCgtTtIZouFJPE-Q&s=19

    Ukraine is not our biggest problem. The people trying to convince you that Ukraine is our biggest problem are our biggest problem.

    1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      ^ This

    2. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

      I read that this morning; he makes good points [and probably one of his best editorials]. We can also support and lend aid to the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine and sanction Putin and his oligarchs without engaging in a hot war [as would be the case with imposing any degree of no fly zone]. Though true thought libertarians around here probably think that any effect on them is just unacceptable

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        It is.
        You don't get to put a gun to my head to take resources for your "moral" cause that has nothing to do with us but feelz

        1. Joe Friday   3 years ago

          Well, yeah we do Nardz. If you don't like it go somewhere where there are no taxes. Good luck. Bon voyage.

          1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

            Totalitarian jackoff supports this, of course, up until Republicans pounce in turn.

          2. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

            Hey Joe, how much extra did you contribute to the cause?

            1. R Mac   3 years ago

              His mom still claims him as a dependent.

    3. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

      And I also agree that our "biggest problem" is much closer to home, 1600 PA Avenue to be precise.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    The three former Sharon Hill police officers who opened fire at an Academy Park High School football game in August, killing an 8-year-old girl...

    When your righteous calling is protecting the vulnerable, the world is your backstop.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    But that attitude usually offends the social justice set.

    What attitude doesn't eventually offend the social justice set?

  18. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    #BidenBoom update!

    The Warren Buffett Net Worth Index went up over $1 billion yesterday. Putting it at plus $10.5 billion already this year.

    The WBNWI is, of course, what Reason's leading economics expert used from 2009 to 2016 to prove Obama's economy was the strongest ever. Well, by that crucial metric the Biden economy is even better.

    #DefendBidenAtAllCosts

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Plus the fact that the only thing that the transitory inflation has affected was the 10¢ price increase on a pouch of spittin tobaccy.

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

        As Will Rogers famously said:
        Never slap a man who's chewing tobacco.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    Massachusetts is revising down its COVID death count.

    This doesn't mean that crazy conspiracy theory was true.

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      The dead are coming back to life!

      1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   3 years ago

        Election season is coming so it's only natural that the dead come back to life to head to the voting booth. It's like how those cicadas come back every 17 years.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

          "10,000 lives created or saved."

  20. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    A look inside America's first official safe injection site.

    Through DEA binoculars.

  21. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

    Covid is also spreading rapidly in New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and several other Pacific countries that had previously kept caseloads low."

    These are the most vaccinated, locked down and mask wearing countries of all. And now they will waste another 2 years of their lives doing the same.

    1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

      >Oh hey, I'm a fucking island. Woohoo!
      >Oh wait, I want to trade with other countries...
      >*achoo*
      >Back on lockdown.

    2. Zeb   3 years ago

      Same pattern we've seen for over a year now. Everywhere that was congratulating themselves on doing such a good job by denying basic rights to their populations will have their turn eventually.

  22. Jerryskids   3 years ago

    However, over half of these correspondence audits [Correspondence audit = a letter was sent regarding a particular line item] were targeted at the small proportion of workers with incomes so low they had claimed an anti-poverty earned tax credit to offset the tax otherwise due on their modest earned income. To repeat: over half – fully 54 percent – of all correspondence audits last year targeted the small proportion of returns with gross receipts of less than $25,000 claiming an earned income tax credit.

    Some "audit". My guess is that they claimed the EIC but didn't included the eligible child's Social Security number.

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

      My guess is that the EITC is the scam that the identity thieves have been using to get money filing fraudulent returns. Filing a fraudulent return for smart taxpayers that keep their money all year and usually owe some to the IRS sends up all kinds of red flags.

  23. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/Doc_0/status/1503721069450240006?t=hbHdvS3y5KFLqawtn-WyEw&s=19

    The Ukraine war is giving people who loathe America, her history, and most of her citizens a chance to run around calling others "traitors." They are embracing this opportunity with gusto. The day before yesterday, they were ranting against nationalism and jingoistic patriotism.

    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

      Dont forget that recent survey where the majority of democrats said they would pack up and run if there was an attack on America, and the majority of republicans said "come and get some"

      1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

        Didn't need a survey to tell me that.

      2. Longtobefree   3 years ago

        My personal belief is that the 'democrats' who said they would stay are either lying or actually republicans.

  24. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/TheAfrican_Hub/status/1503406772572373009?t=7Uux6YndodpLzJ7OgilS5w&s=19

    The most air strikes ever launched in Africa by NATO was more than 10,000 on Libya in 2011 with over 500,000 Civilian Casualities. When Nato was questioned about civilian Casualities and the death of Gaddafi children, they insisted that it was collateral damage and normal in wars

    1. Rubbish!   3 years ago

      Obvious bullshit. There were nowhere near this many strikes in 2011 and they overstated the civilian casualties by about 499,600. https://www.newamerica.org/international-security/reports/airstrikes-and-civilian-casualties-libya/the-conflicts-in-libya-2011-2018/ From the article:
      Reported civilian deaths as a result of the air wars in Libya from 2012 to 2018 number at least 242 and potentially as many as 395, based on the minimum and maximum estimates of civilian casualties in our database. These are low estimates compared to Iraq and Syria, similar conflicts in that multiple belligerents are conducting strikes.
      That Twitter source implies that 10,000 airstrikes caused 500,000 deaths -- so on its face it's obvious bullshit. That's an average of 50 deaths for every strike. Can't get those production results even if it was deliberate targeting.

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        No shit, but this guy is about as accurate as western coverage of Ukraine

    2. Quo Usque Tandem   3 years ago

      Quick check of your "facts:"

      The Libyan official sources claimed that at least between 64 and 90 people were killed during the bombardments on the first two days of the U.N. intervention and another 150 had been wounded.[20] The Vatican news agency claimed that in Tripoli alone, at least 40 civilians died as a result of the bombing campaign.[21] According to the Libyan Health office, the airstrikes killed 1,108 civilians and wounded 4,500 by July 13.[22]

      On April 1, NATO airstrikes killed 14 rebel fighters and wounded seven more on the frontline at Brega.[23]
      On April 7, news reports surfaced that NATO bombers killed 10–13 rebels and wounded 14–22 near the eastern oil town of Brega.[24]
      On April 27, at least one NATO warplane accidentally attacked the Libyan rebel forces position near the besieged city of Misrata, killing 12 fighters and wounding five others.[25]
      On May 13, 11 religious imams were claimed to be killed and 50 others injured when a NATO airstrike struck a large gathering in Brega praying for peace in conflict-ridden Libya.[26]
      On June 19, at least nine civilians were killed in a NATO airstrike on Tripoli. Reporters saw bodies being pulled out of a destroyed building. NATO acknowledged being responsible for the civilians' deaths.[27]
      On June 20, The then Libyan government, claimed that 15 civilians including three children had been killed by a NATO airstrike on Sorman.[28]
      On July 25, 11 civilians were claimed killed[29] by a NATO airstrike on a medical clinic in Zliten.[30]
      On July 30, 3 journalists were killed and 15 wounded in NATO attacks against the Libyan state TV Al-Jamahiriya, which continued to broadcast after the attacks.[31]
      On August 9, the Libyan government claimed that 85 civilians were killed in NATO airstrikes on Majer, a village near Zliten.[32] A NATO spokesman confirmed that they bombed Zliten on August 8 and 9,[33] but said that he was unable to confirm the casualties. The Libyan government declared three days of national mourning. Reporters were later taken to a hospital where they saw at least 30 dead bodies including the bodies of at least two young children. The Libyan government claimed that the bodies of others killed in the airstrikes were taken to other hospitals.[34] Commander of the NATO military mission in Libya, Lieutenant General Charles Bouchard said "I cannot believe that 85 civilians were present when we struck in the wee hours of the morning, and given our intelligence. But I cannot assure you that there were none at all".[35]
      On March 2, 2012, after the conclusion of hostilities, the United Nations Human Rights Council released a comprehensive report concluding that in total 60 civilians were killed and 55 wounded by the NATO air campaign.

      Regardless of the source, seems a tad shy of 500,000, no?

  25. Jerry B.   3 years ago

    "Fifty-four percent of correspondence audits were aimed at "the small proportion of returns with gross receipts of less than $25,000 claiming an earned income tax credit.""

    That's because there's a lot of fraud in returns claiming EITC.

    1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      Up above it was claimed that those who use the EITC were too stupid to know how to do it.

      1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   3 years ago

        So they're stupid AND sleazy? Why aren't they running for office?

        1. perlhaqr   3 years ago

          No money.

  26. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1503721698796974083?t=4hZ965YUK46hNKt8i0XnYw&s=19

    If you want a peek into the massive f*ckery happening between DOJ and the DC District Court related to Jan 6 prosecution, read this. This J6 case is egregious but not unusual in terms of how these judges refuse to force the government to follow the law:

    "Such commendations and expression of apology and frustration by judges are totally empty...when no actual urgency is brought to bear by the judicial system in response to clear...allegations that the defendant is being unlawfully detained."

    Political prisoners.

    [Link]

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    "In 2021, the IRS conducted 306,944 audits of the lowest-income earners and 352,059 audits of people of all other income levels, according to TRAC. Just 39,449 audits were of people with taxable incomes between $200,000 and $1 million per year."

    Call this the inverse-Dillinger, i.e. going where the money is not.

    1. Brandybuck   3 years ago

      It's going where the violations are. As an IRS agent you have a quota of audits. Moreover, you have a quota of audits that result in findings. That's your job. It's like cops and arrests. Gotta make them to meet your quota.

      And it's easier to catch the poor making a filing mistake than the middle class who can afford a tax service, or the rich who can afford an accountant.

      1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

        The article actually did due diligence in breaking down the rate per 100,000 on audits.

        Government hates small business and loves friends from the campaign trail. The IRS has been demonstrated as a corrupt organization many, many times.

        The petty gains from shaking small business down are minute, even factoring time and ease when opposed to getting big fish.

  28. Rich   3 years ago

    "Does it make sense from either an equity or revenue standpoint to focus IRS's limited firepower on the poorest taxpayers among us—those with incomes so low they have filed returns claiming an anti-poverty earned income tax credit?"

    Does it make sense from a JOBS-PROVISION standpoint?

  29. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    "The decision is at odds with a federal court holding that license plates are free speech. In 2020, a federal court held that California's ban on plates with "connotations offensive to good taste and decency" was unconstitutional—paving the way for QUEER and SLAAYRR license plates."

    What about MAGA?

    1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

      I need a safe space!

  30. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1503691125785309188?t=WWPBunv9AZPu4100lWXcig&s=19

    John Podhoretz is out the gate with a proclamation that neoconservative foreign policy has been officially vindicated, and that its "key foes" today are no longer "hip liberals" -- as was the case in past decades -- but "traditional conservatives"

    [Link]

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      Just reading Shrike's posts alone can tell us that.

  31. Rich   3 years ago

    ban on plates with "connotations offensive to good taste and decency" was unconstitutional—paving the way for QUEER

    Wait.... Are you saying "QUEER" is "offensive to good taste and decency"?! HATE CRIME!!

  32. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    "DeWine's decision to sign the bill into law came over objections from law enforcement groups, county sheriffs and Democrats"

    Hmm, opposing this alliance might be libertarian.

  33. Rich   3 years ago

    Massachusetts is revising down its COVID death count. The state "will start using a new public health surveillance definition"

    "in which death of a POC is counted as 3/5 of a regular death."

  34. Earth-based Human Skeptic   3 years ago

    Mass incarceration? With men making up 90% of prisoners its time to support more arrests of women. Equity!

    1. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

      Nah, it doesn't work like that. Just like the chickenhawk cunts are gung-ho to conscript 18 year old young men to go die in Ukraine while they hold down the domestic front by posting Ukrainian hoaxes on Twitter, they're equally happy to be relieved from responsibility for their crimes by their cunt privilege while men get assfucked in prison every day for 20 years for selling a naughty plant.

      1. Longtobefree   3 years ago

        https://babylonbee.com/news/sudden-spike-in-women-advocating-for-traditional-gender-roles-now-that-ww3-starting

  35. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Days since enbs last yglasias reffrence : 6

  36. Union of Concerned Socks   3 years ago

    Good and hard.

  37. raspberrydinners   3 years ago

    More reason bullshit.

    Let's break it down- Biden wants to increase the IRS budget entirely because the top earners can pay scads of lawyers to fight anything the IRS wants to nail them on. They therefore, with their limited budget now, have to go after small fish.

    More money would mean being able to actually nail these rich fucks to the wall right where they belong so maybe they'd have to start paying their taxes like the rest of us.

    But again, reason is doing the knob slobbing for the Koch team as usual who I would hazard don't want any extra scrutiny on their tax accounts. Big surprise. Journalism? Nah, just prostitution masquerading as journalism.

    1. raspberrydinners   3 years ago

      Moreover, simplifying the tax code (and actually simplifying it- not just giving tax breaks to the wealthy like the TCJA) would do more to help taxes than even more money to the IRS.

      Stop carving out loopholes for all these rich fucks all the time. It's not a hard idea to grasp. Why not write on that reason? Oh yeah, because then your Koch owners might have to actually pay something.

      1. JesseAz   3 years ago

        90% of the tax breaks went to those making under 150k...

        Are you just a fucking idiot?

        1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

          Yes.

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            Not “just”. Also extremely dishonest. It’s a terrible combination.

      2. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

        The “Koch Brothers” were Charles and David. David is still dead since 2019, so it would be “Koch owner”.

    2. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      Presstitutes, raspberrydinners? = Journalism? Nah, just prostitution masquerading as journalism.

    3. Illocust   3 years ago

      You assume that people with scads of lawyers and everything to lose are evading paying taxes in any significant amount. Instead of simply following the letter of the law and getting results you don't like. Middle/professional class is a lot more likely to not being paying their fair share, as they have enough assets to be complicated, but not enough assets to have their taxes pre-audited for accuracy by a team of accountants.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        He thinks “rich” guys are doing taxes on the kitchen table.

      2. JimboJr   3 years ago

        This highlights the current (and usual) issue with progs. They dont have a grasp on what is actually happening, nor the critical thinking to figure it out. The vast majority of the rich they complain about are just using the existing tax code.

        1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

          The tax code, the legal system, legislation and pretty much every facet of our laws has been tailored to favor the rich and sophisticated.

          But instead of noticing that this all stems from complexity in the sytems being prohibitive to citizen interface, the solution is a more convoluted mess that somehow winds up squeezing the middle harder to pay for the bottom while the top profits.

    4. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

      They therefore, with their limited budget now, have to go after small fish.

      They *have* to!

    5. R Mac   3 years ago

      Your stupidity is as entertaining as ever.

    6. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

      I highly doubt ENB consulted with Charles Koch before typing in this morning’s roundup.

      1. R Mac   3 years ago

        Caw caw!

    7. CE   3 years ago

      Limited budget? The IRS just added 12 billion in budget, on top of the 87,000 agents they added in the Bilk Back Better plan.

      Biden wants to increase the IRS payroll because most of those new employees are Democrats, who now have high-paying union jobs with good benefits and can support Democrat politicians better. If the 87,000 new agents squeeze enough additional revenue out of the taxpayers, he doesn't even have to count the spending as additive to the deficit.

  38. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/ejmalrai/status/1503597212709838854?t=Yx8lZVYJen2wQSVl2yHaqA&s=19

    Day 19 of the #US - #Russia war on #Ukrainian soil:

    In over dozens of wars I have covered, I have never seen so much disinformation campaign, speculation and false narratives from "experts" producing so much information with no access of any fact whatsoever of the ground.

    This is how it is working:
    Brainwash everybody with an avalanche of information so you sound like an expert and get thousands of followers a day and become "the expert" on "#Russia weakness and incapability to occupy #Ukraine in one single day".

    An example of the narrative:
    1. " #Russia failed to occupy #Kyiv in two days."
    A country, #Ukraine, with over 600k km2, bigger than France, Belgium and Hollande together; or bigger than #Syria and #Iraq, should have been occupied in two days according to experts.

    And after starting with this hypothesis of "failing to occupy #Kyiv in 2 days", everything else is based on the first personal misleading disinformation.
    2. "#Russia failed to advance or register any progress on the ground."
    Why the Ukrainians are negotiating then?

    I can stay here all day writing about hundreds of examples of false narratives and hypotheses "experts" are building upon their narrative, and many according "to US officials" who are the leaders of this false propaganda against #Russia, but won't waist my time and yours.

    Bottom line:
    1. #Ukraine army has been trained by the #US and #NATO since 2015.
    2. US failure to respect its verbal promise to keep NATO away from the former Soviet Union countries is behind US-Russia clash. Surf the net decades back and you'll find all the warnings since 1997.

    3. The #US has been provoking #Russia to a fight in a third country (Georgia and Ukraine) and supplying weapons to Ukraine after studying the kind of war Russia could start and which forces it can inject into the battle.

    4. #US and #NATO supply #Ukraine with adequate weapons to keep #Russia the longest possible in the country by mounting guerrilla warfare with anti-tank missiles. Normal because Ukrainian airforce and military capability as a classical army were defeated from day two.

    5. #Russia used gloves in the 1st weeks of this war on many fronts, not on others, & reached #Kyiv in 2 days when the #US &coalition needed 21 days to occupy #Iraq, a country with no support, under heavy sanctions, no resources, no friends & people supported Saddam Hussein's fall

    6. Because the US objective to break #Russia's prestige regardless of the number of #Ukranian killed, #Moscow is changing its military tactics & starting different tactics to compensate it 1st softer one.
    7. Still Russia prefers to end this war negotiating w/minimum losses to all

    8. If #Ukraine leadership has lost the control over their decision that has been totally under the US's thumb (as #Afghanistan president self-description of how he has become before being abandoned by the US), then the war will continue and more people will be killed.

    9. Why I spoke, and continue speaking, from day one about the false narrative? Because it is a déja vu in other wars triggered by the #US in other parts of the world where mainstream media stands behind the misinformation campaign and loses its credibility. Nothing new really.

    The consequences of #US- #Russia war on #Ukraine:

    The beginning of the end of dollarisation and people think "Russia is losing". Yes, on Twitter.

    #SaudiArabia discussing with #China the use of #Yuan in its commercial and energy trade.

    1. Mickey Rat   3 years ago

      "If you want to go back and have an ex post facto justifications of why Ukraine did not act perfectly at one time, think about the next question. The next question is: Does that deserve, should it precipitate a violent invasion that kills thousands of people, including babies, women, toddlers, ten year olds, soldiers, like is that for a NATO debate? You think that's OK? You do? Well, all right. You're fucked up, and you need some help, because that's not OK, and that is not the way these things should be resolved."
      - Michael Moynihan, Fifth Column Podcast episode 349.

      1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

        Can Russia permit a hostile foreign organization to continually creep closer to its borders, or is it more cost-effective and resulting in less life lost overall to pre-empt Ukraine joining NATO and annex it as a buffer?

        Putin is not on Santa's nice list, ever, but trying to cast him as the sole antagonist is some seriously myopic propoganda.

        1. Mickey Rat   3 years ago

          Ukraine is not a NATO member, nor was it going to be a NATO member anytime soon. Russia already has a number of NATO nations on its borders. That excuse is nonsense. That being said, Ukraine has a right to it's own foreign policy as an independent nation,so even of it were that would not justify Rusia's actions.

          Get help.

          1. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

            The color revolution we executed in Ukraine in 2014 was expressly for the purpose of installing a government sympathetic to NATO and EU membership despite the NATO charter disallowing Ukraine's entry due to its political situation. Try reading a fucking book some time you ignorant jingoistic cocksucking chickenhawk faggot. Here's a hint: books are printed words that don't have a title bar that says "vox.com" at the top.

          2. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

            Putin invaded 4 days after Kamala Harris gave a speech in Ukraine telling an enthusiastic Pres. Zelensky to join NATO.

            And just to yank your chain, you know the biolabs thing is real, right? US sponsored since 2005 in exchange for samples and oversight.

            1. Nardz   3 years ago

              She's taking it a step further than that even...

              https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1502781514702020611?t=hS1MbaHXOAM6tr_9-rNhVQ&s=19

              WATCH: Kamala Harris falsely suggests Ukraine is part of NATO.
              [Video]

      2. Nardz   3 years ago

        Pure appeal to emotion, and lying is ok because #IStandWithUkraine.
        State Department simps like you get us into wars and totalitarian collectivism to satisfy your feelz.

        1. Mickey Rat   3 years ago

          You are the one rationalizing wars and is licking a dictator's jackboots.

          1. Nardz   3 years ago

            Suck that globalist cock, soy.

            1. Mickey Rat   3 years ago

              Nardz: "Step on me, Daddy Vladimir! Just like you do to those naughty Ukrainians!"

              1. Nardz   3 years ago

                Here we see Mickey confirm he's gone full progressive npc

                1. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

                  Sending your kids to die in Ukraine to make the Bidens and Romneys wealthier is a small price to pay for the sweet, sweet taste of presidential semen, Nardz.

              2. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

                Ukraine is still taking foreign volunteers to fight, you know.

          2. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

            He's literally not though. You've been fully bought into every single piece of Ukrainian propaganda from day 1, including the debunked "Ghost of Kyiv" and the 13 "Russia warship fuck you!" hoaxes. Every post you make on this topic makes you look more fucking stupid. It's disappointing because you used to have a fucking brain, but you've turned into a literal neocon state-worshiping cocksucker, and I genuinely and sincerely hope you are the first stupid American cunt to get his brains splattered in the war you're agitating for. Or you could just die nice and slow of stomach cancer, that would be good too. But at least if you die for the noble Ukrainian cause, some American politician's great-grandson might turn an extra profit, right you chickenhawk faggot?

        2. bignose   3 years ago

          Putin's 'feelz' that the NATO is an aggressive threat to his nation (despite that not being the case) are legit though?

          1. Nardz   3 years ago

            It's an unavoidable conclusion in light of the facts since the demise of the Soviet Union

          2. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

            So NATO did NOT explicitly deny Russia membership when it asked to join? It has not put missiles and military bases on its borders and didn't engage in decades of anti-Russian rhetoric?

      3. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

        you dont have to think it's OK to realize that regardless, this is a complex geopolitical situation and yes, western shenanigans played a part.

        1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   3 years ago

          Unacceptable levels of nuance. We're Russia Man Bad-ing right now.

        2. Zeb   3 years ago

          That's pretty much where I'm at. I don't think Putin is justified. But the main thing is that we need to stay the fuck out of it.

          1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

            ^

            There is no good guys here.

      4. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

        TEH CHILDRUNZ!!!!!!!

        I remember when you used to have a brain.

      5. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        The next question is: Does that deserve, should it precipitate a violent invasion that kills thousands of people, including babies, women, toddlers, ten year olds, soldiers, like is that for a NATO debate?

        Why the fuck is that the next question? Lefties don't even make an attempt at logic.

        1. Zeb   3 years ago

          I don't find it hard to not think the invasion is OK and also to think that it doesn't need to be a global crisis that requires the US to get involved.

    2. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

      Nardz, interesting points.
      1. So what.
      2. Times and circumstances changed. The Soviets/Russians also pulled a lot of bullshit.
      3. This has the whiff of bullshit.
      4. I don't want the US supplying Ukraine directly. I am fine with Europeans doing that. It is their backyard.
      5. Ok.
      6. This also has the whiff of brown bovine organic matter.
      7. Agree.
      8. That is a big 'If'.
      9. Keep talking, Nardz. I listen, even though I don't always agree.

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        1. I think it's just an acknowledgement that while Ukraine isn't in NATO, you can certainly say NATO is in Ukraine.
        2. Russia became less of a threat. So what's NATO's purpose now?
        3. Only if you ignore the last 20 years. You know the term "color revolution" comes from the NGO orchestrated protest movements in Georgia (2003, Rose) and Ukraine (2004, Orange)?
        4. Agreed, it's Europe's business, except for all the US money paying for it.
        5. Yet the media tells a completely different story. They sell us fiction and outright lies.
        6. Maybe. But then why does US policy seem to be completely antagonistic and uninterested in negotiated peace?
        7. But, again, globalist media/officials would have us believe something else. They flood messaging with talk of war of conquest, genocide, and Putin the madman. The agenda is coordinated and clear.
        8. I'd put that "if" at best (or worst) at 50/50. There are certainly indications that Zelensky faces pressure/threats from the security/paramilitary forces to limit his options- see the assassination of a member of their negotiating team, an alleged spy but they've changed their story on that a couple times.
        9. It is a repost of someone else's tweet, but I too welcome thoughtful discussion. I'll keep posting perspectives that the dominant/institutional narrative tries to suppress.

        1. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

          Keep posting the different perspectives, Nardz. We need to hear them.

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            ^

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

        4. I don't want the US supplying Ukraine directly. I am fine with Europeans doing that. It is their backyard.

        Given how many European countries are in NATO and buy our shit, that's sort of a moot point, isn't it? Those Stingers and Javelins the Ukrainians are lighting off sure aren't from Polish stocks. NATO's just a pass-through for our stuff, the same way the GCC is in the Middle East.

    3. CE   3 years ago

      Just because both sides are doing propaganda, it will never make the invaders the good guys.

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        If you're thinking in terms of exclusively good guys vs bad guys, your assessments aren't going to match up with reality

      2. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

        it will never make the invaders the good guys.

        Not even if they are noble altruists bringing freedom and democracy to the benighted sand niggers, you pathetic state-worshiping jingoistic chickenhawk faggot?

      3. R Mac   3 years ago

        Whether you agree or not, can you not at least recognize the point of view that Ukraine was the aggressor when Russian speaking people in the Donbas wanted to succeed? I bet those people that have been getting shelled consider Ukraine the bad guys.

        1. Zeb   3 years ago

          That's probably the biggest complication to the narrative if you are into political/regional self-determination. I kind of thought at first that Putin was just going to occupy those places as some kind of "peace keeper" (very deliberate scare quotes). Now I don't know what he thinks he's doing.

          1. Nardz   3 years ago

            My guess:
            Putin came to the conclusion that simply pushing Ukraine away from the Donbass wouldn't solve the threat posed by a hostile, NATO-entangled regime in Kiev controlling rump Ukraine. Relieving pressure on LPR & DPR doesn't solve the problem of invasion via Ukraine. What's point of going to war for a slightly better status quo if you view the status quo in general as an existential threat. Kiev would still be cozied up with NATO while refusing to recognize the statuses of LPR, DPR, and Crimea, just not actively shelling them anymore. In fact, it would leave Ukraine's military basically whole and "justify" more equipment and involvement from NATO.

            Now, it's a big gamble, but if NATO does hold out on refusing direct intervention, you've fractured the Ukraine-NATO partnership. At some point, the Ukrainian people are going to have to ask themselves what they were really fighting for when Russia gets recognition for Crimea, independence of LPR and DPR, constitutional neutrality, and diminished role for extremist paramilitaries and in the security state, but doesn't occupy the country.
            Will the population be so pro EU/NATO when it realizes those were the stakes their government and the west were sacrificing them for? The invasion is being sold as a war of extermination and conquest, but Russian demands have been consistent for 8 years and their behavior belies Zelensky's and the globalist narrative.
            I don't think a limited "special operation" accomplishes the goals of tamping down the threat of aggression from Ukraine's rulers and NATO, especially if the extremist elements aren't cowed and the western Ukrainian population remains idealistic about their leadership and place in the western/globalist food chain.

        2. Longtobefree   3 years ago

          Killing people who want freedom has been acceptable since the 1860s.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

            BCE?

  39. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

    "The three former Sharon Hill police officers who opened fire at an Academy Park High School football game in August, killing an 8-year-old girl, were held for trial Thursday on criminal charges relating to her death," reports The Philadelphia Inquirer.

    What these officers did was bad enough that you really don't have to characterize it like that. I don't understand why, when you get really good cases for your narrative, you feel the need to push the narrative even further. It's like you're asking for people to dispute your lies just so you can get into a fight over it.

  40. Brandybuck   3 years ago

    > Lowest-Income Taxpayers Are the Most Likely To Be Audited

    Well duh! They're the easiest to catch!

    The rich have accountants. The poor do not. The rich are more likely to be educated, the poor least likely, and education correlates to an accurate filling out of forms. The rich (and middle class) can afford to have someone else do their taxes, the poor cannot.

    So of course the government is going to audit the poor! When you're bonus is tied to how many people get run through the wringer, of course you're going to target the poor!

    The progressives know this too. How can they not? Their incessant call for more taxation is going to disproportionately affect the poor.

  41. Marshal   3 years ago

    "Does it make sense from either an equity or revenue standpoint to focus IRS's limited firepower on the poorest taxpayers among us—those with incomes so low they have filed returns claiming an anti-poverty earned income tax credit?" TRAC asks. "This question alone raises profound issues.

    Actually it does make sense. The easiest and most common tax fraud in America is not claiming income received in cash. This is almost exclusively a low income problem.

    1. Rich   3 years ago

      Well, until the digital dollar mandate.

  42. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/alexandrosM/status/1503714520287498244?t=mEyGUoCkyAPnQz04DUqMyw&s=19

    While everyone has their eyes on Ukraine, there's a comprehensive control system being erected all around us.

    Let's count the ways.

    First, there is the treaty being worked on, on the level of the WHO. The details have not been worked out yet, but the Director General of the WHO is pushing for a binding treaty with the power to apply sanctions if 2/3rds of the members agree.

    Next, Biden signed an executive order so "study" the "risks" of cryptocurrency, and begin work on the "digital dollar".

    The Financial Times helpfully informs us that Central Bank Digital Currencies, such as the Digital Dollar, will have to be Digital ID based, since banks are already bound by Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering regulations.

    It should be noted that these regulations don't actually seem very good at their stated purpose. But they do make excellent control mechanisms for law-abiding citizens.

    So what are Central Bank Digital Currencies? Well, in a way, it's like turning all money into food stamps. It can allow for all sorts of constraints to be placed on currency, including where, when, by whom, and on what it can be spent.

    So if you thought Canada freezing Bank accounts linked to protests was scary, central banks are constructing a power that is far greater, an ability to intervene on every single transaction.

    In the meantime, vaccine passports are being implemented.
    "IATA welcomes the EU’s effective work on establishing the EU DCC system across Europe and, at the same time, urges the World Health Organisation to build a global digital vaccine standard."

    In the US, a similar system is being implemented on the state level.

    And these technologies are getting implemented on technology you own and carry with you.

    And really, why not on your smartwatch?

    At the same time, if you thought the COVID-19 vaccines were developed at miracle speeds, wait until you see the next generation!

    How far are we from a world where a pandemic is declared, and within a few months everyone is mandated to accept a medical procedure or lose access to their assets, or even the ability to buy food until they comply?

    In fact, you may not have to protest physically to lose basic rights. Media, tech, and "fact checkers" all proudly cooperate to control the spread of "misinformation".

    And as far as the US govt is concerned, they're not going far enough.
    According to the NYT: "Dr. Vivek Murthy also demanded information from the platforms about the major sources of Covid-19 misinformation. Companies have until May 2 to submit the data."

    In fact, I can tell you confidently, that the introduction of single points of control / single points of failure is exactly what we try to avoid when architecting large-scale systems, as they're well understood to be a threat to the stability and security of the system.

    When people spoke about "turnkey totalitarianism", they were called conspiracy theorists and their voices were suppressed. Now it's all out in the open. There's no hiding whatsoever.

    [Links]

    1. Rich   3 years ago

      How far are we from a world where a pandemic is declared, and within a few months everyone is mandated to accept a medical procedure or lose access to their assets, or even the ability to buy food until they comply?

      "It's Flu Season again! Thanks for your cooperation!"

    2. NOYB2   3 years ago

      The Financial Times helpfully informs us that Central Bank Digital Currencies, such as the Digital Dollar, will have to be Digital ID based, since banks are already bound by Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering regulations.

      But at least you'll still be able to vote without identifying yourself!

    3. Cronut   3 years ago

      "Control promises efficiency, safety, while building an ever greater risk of inescapable systemic failure."

      And systemic failure will lead to more control.

    4. CE   3 years ago

      Yup, no more "Know Thy Customer" rules with 10K or 5K or 600 dollar thresholds. Big Brother will know all, on every transaction, and can freeze them by the spender, or at particular places you want to spend them.

      Kind of the opposite of a nothingburger.

  43. Sevo   3 years ago

    "Leftist is frontrunner after Colombia presidential primaries"
    [...]
    "As opinion polls had indicated, leftist Sen. Gustavo Petro emerged as the current leader in the race for the presidency. With nearly all votes counted, he won the primary for the Historical Pact, a coalition of left-wing parties, with 80% of the more than 5.4 million votes cast in its primary..."
    https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/leftist-frontrunner-colombia-presidential-primaries-83427959

    It'll work THIS time!

  44. NOYB2   3 years ago

    In 2021, the IRS conducted 306,944 audits of the lowest-income earners and 352,059 audits of people of all other income levels, according to TRAC. Just 39,449 audits were of people with taxable incomes between $200,000 and $1 million per year.

    That's because people with taxable incomes above $200,000 per year usually pay for tax accountants who prepare the tax returns properly. Those tax accountants are strongly motivated not to aid in tax fraud because their livelihood is on the line.

    And the fact that you are comparing "taxable incomes between $200,000 and $1 million per year" with "all other incomes" (i.e., lower and higher) suggests that you are trying to manipulate readers to begin with. What pathetic reporting.

    1. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

      eliminate the IRS regardless

      1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   3 years ago

        This.

        The fact that you need pricey professional help to keep them off your back is a problem.

        Also income tax is theft.

    2. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

      No matter how much lipstick you put on that pig before you stuck your half-limp microchode in its putrid bunghole, nobody's gonna buy it as your trophy wife.

      Can't wait until it happens to you btw. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right you bootlicking Nazi cunt?

      1. NOYB2   3 years ago

        No matter how much lipstick you put on that pig

        I'm not "putting lipstick on that pig", I explained why poor people get audited a lot.

        People like me forego thousands in deductions and pay thousands for tax preparers in this racket.

        Can't wait until it happens to you btw. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear, right you bootlicking Nazi cunt?

        I'm not defending this system. It's "Nazi cunts" like you who engage in name calling and class warfare.

        But you know, the miserable and poor life you obviously lead is already punishes you.

  45. NOYB2   3 years ago

    "Does it make sense from either an equity or revenue standpoint to focus IRS's limited firepower on the poorest taxpayers among us—those with incomes so low they have filed returns claiming an anti-poverty earned income tax credit?" TRAC asks. "This question alone raises profound issues.

    Yes: that is likely where most of the fraud is. And the "poorest taxpayers" are not paying their fair share to begin with. So much for equity.

    1. creech   3 years ago

      And how is "audit" defined? Is it "we have a W-2 you didn't show" or is it "come into the office with all your records?" Knowing a few revenue agents and tax preparers over the years, I remember that they feel the lower income( therefore less sophisticated) tax payer has little chance of correctly filling out today's complicated tax return. Higher income types understand math better ("subtract line 14a from line 12 and enter the smaller of zero or the result"), understand gobbletygook instructions better, and soon realize they need H&R Block to prepare their returns. So, naturally, the IRS - through its computer matching programs - is going to find more discrepancies among the lower income returns and seek to "audit" them. Short of abolishing income taxes, the revenue code needs to be simplified.

      1. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

        the revenue code needs to be simplified.

        They will never do that for obvious reasons

      2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        And how is "audit" defined?

        Who cares if the headline generates clicks?

        Since the standard deduction is $12,500, the chance that people showing less than $25k in income are itemizing is zero. So the difference in the audit rate is all about asking for proof for credits taken. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of them are students taking credits that belong to their parents. Petulant little rich assholes.

    2. JimboJr   3 years ago

      I like how Biden/Yellen were talking about having automatic IRS notification for bank accounts with 10,000 worth of transactions or more than 600$ from paypal/venmo and people are just now coming around to "hey...this is probably targeted at poor people"

      1. CE   3 years ago

        Looking for their cut of crypto trading profits.

  46. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/wakoppa/status/1429869785513447425?t=pyX_zJGYJ23P8QRRnzNyyQ&s=19

    Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, is planning to replace a recognised democratic model with a model where a self-selected group of ‘stakeholders’ make decisions on behalf of the people, "a silent global coup d'etat" to capture governance."

    [Links]

    1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

      Everyone participating in this needs to be arrested and changed accordingly by their various own governments.

      1. Salted Nuts   3 years ago

        Feet first, into the woodchipper set to slow.

      2. Nardz   3 years ago

        Heads+pikes

        Examples need to be made.

    2. CE   3 years ago

      So democracy really is hanging by a thread. And they plan to cut the thread.

  47. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Keith Olbermann has apparently declared war on Russia on America's behalf:

    Watchdog
    @LibWatchdog
    This is so deranged. The View calling for Tucker and Tulsi to be investigated by DOJ and suggest prison.

    Keith Olbermann
    @KeithOlbermann
    Replying to @LibWatchdog
    They are Russian Assets and there is a war. There's a case for detaining them militarily. Trials are a sign of good faith and patience on the part of democracy.
    https://twitter.com/keitholbermann/status/1503467489572921346

    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

      Progs, our usual anti-patriotic, america hating, "anti war" folks, sure sound like neocons after 911.

      1. NOYB2   3 years ago

        Progs have always been pro-war. They have been the driving forces between empire building and subjugation of other nations and cultures, "for their own good" of course.

    2. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

      it's really hard to imagine anyone taking this man seriously at this point.

    3. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

      Hey, remember when old Keith spent 8 years histrionically bitching about the war in Iraq while Bush was in office and then promptly shut his cum guzzling cock holster the moment Obama was inaugurated? Good to see him come around to the fact that he deserved extraordinary rendition back in 2005.

    4. CE   3 years ago

      There is a war somewhere, involving someone else, so lock up anyone who disagrees with me, just in case.

      1. CE   3 years ago

        And I'm glad he sees military trials of people exercising their First Amendment rights as a sign of "patience" on the part of the government, rather than just lining them up against the wall.

  48. Nardz   3 years ago

    Zelensky's first sentence to US congress: "I want to talk about my feelings"

    1. Nardz   3 years ago

      Zelensky: "We're not asking for much"

      Just billions of dollars confiscated from Americans and world war 3.
      Not much at all...

      1. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

        Compared to being appointed to the presidency of your country in a foreign color revolution in exchange for washing money for wealthy American politicians, it's not so much I guess.

    2. Nardz   3 years ago

      *sorry, speech was to Canadian parliament I think. US tour date is tomorrow

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        Will they be selling merch?

        1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

          Yes, but no Czechs!

        2. Nardz   3 years ago

          Yes, but only in the form of feeling good about yourself because you've sacrificed for "the right side of history"

  49. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Keith Olbermann is a gift.

    Daily Wire
    @realDailyWire
    Rand Paul Introduces Amendment That Will Oust Dr. Fauci For Good http://dlvr.it/SLh7WT

    Keith Olbermann
    @KeithOlbermann
    You know what you should do instead of this, @RandPaul?
    Become an actual doctor.
    https://twitter.com/KeithOlbermann/status/1503466472567455750

    1. Minadin   3 years ago

      Opthalmology is one of the more difficult surgical disciplines. It's akin to being a brain surgeon.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        And Fauci has never practiced like Paul. He's a career bureaucrat.

        Olbermann is an idiot clown.

    2. Enjoy Every Sandwich   3 years ago

      The replies on this one are interesting. Apparently the Cult Of Fauci is still strong in Blue Land.

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        Explains Zelensky's popularity

      2. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

        Iron law of woke projection. Blue land is a bigger more ardent cult than the MAGA folks they always claimed were cultish.

        1. JimboJr   3 years ago

          And the ones screaming about Qanon tend to be the most insane, branch Covidian, russiagate loving, "climate change apocalypse in 10 years, guaranteed!" bunch.

          1. R Mac   3 years ago

            And probably molest children.

    3. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

      Being a practicing surgeon for 3 decades certainly isn't as impressive as obtaining an undergrad degree from the ag-school of the least selective Ivy League uni and parlaying your retarded hot takes on sports into a career doing retarded hot takes on politics.

      1. CE   3 years ago

        I liked him better when he was a sportscaster.
        And I didn't like him much back then.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

          Yeah, he's always been an asshole. A lot of his behavior in the ESPN days was moderated by being around more amiable guys.

  50. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

    Is Buttplug a Russian-bot?

    Dan Crenshaw
    @DanCrenshawTX
    US House candidate, TX-2

    The anti-fossil fuel talking points that you’ve heard from the left for years were likely written by the Russians.
    The radical environmentalists don’t want you know this.

    In 2014, former NATO Secretary General Rasmussen warned of Putin’s dark money machine to undermine American energy.
    “Russia… engaged actively with so-called [NGOs] - environmental organizations working against shale gas - to maintain dependence on imported Russian gas.”

    Even Hillary Clinton admitted that “phony environmental groups” were funded by Russia to “stand against any effort” related to American fracking for natural gas, and that a lot of funding for the anti-fracking movement in the United States was “coming from Russia.”

    In 2017, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a report finding “clear evidence that the Kremlin is financing and choreographing anti-fracking propaganda in the United States.”

    In 2019, former Senior Director for Europe and Russia at the U.S. National Security Council testified that Russia was doing this because Putin sees “American fracking as a great threat to Russian interests” and that a ban on fracking would “play into strengthening Putin’s hands.”

    Putin allegedly uses a San Fransisco-based environmental NGO called Sea Change to funnel money into environmental advocacy efforts designed to undermine American energy. Sea Change receives funding from a Bermuda-based company called Klein Ltd.
    Tip

    According to a 2014 report, Klein Ltd. is used “for funneling Russian government money to American environmental groups in order to undermine U.S. natural gas and oil production to Russia’s benefit.”

    We know for a fact that several high profile environmental groups in America are top recipients of funding from Sea Change. You’ll recognize their names.

    That’s why we’re launching an investigation at
    @HouseCommerce into this potential Russian collusion.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/DanCrenshawTX/status/1503492109311131651

    1. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

      God I'd love to beat that one eyed fucking pussy remf faggot to death. He couldn't even beat his wife without a GPS-guided drone bombardment. Whichever 11 year old Afghan goat fucker blew his eye out deserves a fucking medal.

      1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

        Calm down Shrike, you're scaring the kid's... well, they're already probably pretty terrified what with the raping.

  51. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

    Defund the IRS and I mean that in the fullest sincerity.

    1. Aloysious   3 years ago

      Seconded.

      The Income Tax is possibly the biggest jack boot on the neck of an formerly free people.

      1. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

        it's the biggest political mistake our country ever made and frankly I'm astonished it happened even before women got the vote. Truly amazing.

      2. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

        Libertarian hero Milton Friedman not only invented withholding, but defended it to his dying breath. It's weird, it's almost like every single libertarian thinker without exception was a "former" Marxist.

        1. Longtobefree   3 years ago

          The only thing hurt by withholding was the banks.
          The biggest loan season used to be late March - early April, when people learned how much they owed in taxes. They would take out a loan to pay the taxes, usually for one year.
          Now the taxes themselves, a different story.

        2. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

          he actually called it his biggest mistake, so he didn't defend it to his dying breath.

          That said, if your principles require heroes you've already lost.

    2. CE   3 years ago

      Defund?
      Lay off all the employees and sell the buildings and land to generate some revenue.

      1. Longtobefree   3 years ago

        Keep the land, with a huge monument of a dollar sign labeled "NEVER AGAIN"

  52. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

    Democrats who worried that taking away training requirements would make communities less safe.

    At this point I'm pretty sure that to be Democrat is to be a handwringing pussy.

    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

      I mean, many varieties of pussy, but yes, they mostly vote D

  53. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1503756597096595458?t=RwHJPSl2_D-PZ0qjzSlHPQ&s=19

    “The whole world has condemned this senseless war,” Jens Stoltenberg, the NATO Secretary General, repeated today. Confirming that his vision of the “whole world” somehow excludes India and China

    [Only Europe, the US, Canada, and Australia - the anglosphere/NATO basically- have sanctioned Russia]

    1. Mickey Rat   3 years ago

      Russia certainly has the moral high ground with China on its side.

      1. Nardz   3 years ago

        Mickey certainly has the moral high ground, with Hillary Clinton, George soros, mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, Keith Olbermann, and all the western/globalist oligarchs on his side

        1. bignose   3 years ago

          The "well this bad person agrees with you" game is stupid. That being said, none of those people are morally equivalent to the Chinese Communist Party that is currently committing genocide.

          1. JimboJr   3 years ago

            it especially doesnt work when the left is almost completely bought and paid for by China as it is anyways.

          2. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

            none of those people are morally equivalent to the Chinese Communist Party that is currently committing genocide.

            Certainly not! They are just innocent war profiteers, money launderers, murderers, and bioweapon financiers. Those evil chinks are enslaving the poor Mooslims that we should rightfully and righteously be firebombing with unmanned drones, right you chickenhawk faggot piece of shit?

    2. NOYB2   3 years ago

      “The whole world has condemned this senseless war,” Jens Stoltenberg, the NATO Secretary General, repeated today.

      Yes, and we condemn you and Merkel and Obama and Biden for causing this war, through your inept diplomacy, foreign policy, and energy policy.

      You have blood on your hands, Mr. Stoltenberg.

  54. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1503713905763360777?t=k8jym6Eif4V0EnzwEJ-2Yw&s=19

    JUST IN - US producer price inflation surges to 10% in February, the highest annual increase on record.

    1. CE   3 years ago

      Just stretching the normal parameters a bit.

  55. Sevo   3 years ago

    For those not getting the on-line version of Skeptic (from the latest):

    "Ravi Gupta on the Lost Debate: Whatever Happened to Reasoned Discussion and Respectable Disagreement?"
    [...] the rise of polarized politics in association with political talk radio, TV, and social media; why Republicans supported (and still support) Trump;..."

    Perhaps the poisoning the well by those afflicted with TDS might explain part of it.
    BTW, Gupta is a major D supporter and runs an outfit training campaign workers for, yep, Ds. Shermer could have had a more balanced discussion with whoever is chair of the DNC.

  56. Ali Akbar Alexander   3 years ago

    Put another way, high-income earners had one-third the odds of an audit compared with their low-income counterparts. Only 4.5 out of every 1,000 returns of the $200,000-to-$1 million bracket were audited, compared to 13 out of every 1,000 returns of the lowest-income bracket.

    Phew... that's good to know. I'm a Black, gay man who is GOP Proud so when I go to speak in front of the GOP church ladies and tell them how they are being oppressed by gender studies majors and-- ick-- (I hesitate to use the term) *lesbians* they pay me lots of money. To those that are calling me a secret socialist I ask you this... why would I be a socialist when I am literally rolling in the dough. This is the easiest job ever-- and when I say job I mean typing out a couple of 120 word tweets a couple of times a day on Peter Thiel's free speech site-- Rumble.

    Will you help me to combat the January 6th hoax by contributing to my legal fund? https://givesendgo.com/alialexander

    1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

      You shouldn't have quit that job at *Shop-RITE*, Ali.

    2. JimboJr   3 years ago

      Man I knew the left couldn't meme but it seems that bleeds over into parody too

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

        shriek's absolutely awful at it. That's part of the handicaps of being a slack-jawed, slope-foreheaded hicklib.

        1. Mother's Lament   3 years ago

          He keeps plugging along though. He must've pushed this one hard with his boss at the Soros fifty-cent factory and doesn't want it to fail.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

            Dude's been insanely jealous of OBL for years.

    3. Super Scary   3 years ago

      Pretty poor form to beg for handouts in the comment section of a news post. Also, you say "why would I be a socialist when I am literally rolling in the dough" and then you ask for money?

      Also, you're not going to drop any more n-bombs like you did previously? Was that a step too far, even for parody?

  57. Nardz   3 years ago

    https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1503728487840063491?t=RUNpV7MEQNnSQ6YpLuasOQ&s=19

    JUST IN - Saudi Arabia considers accepting #Yuan instead of #Dollars for Chinese oil sales, the WSJ reports.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      "Hello? This is Joe Biden... I..."

      *Arab accent* "Hold please..."

      "C'mon... man!"

      1. Cronut   3 years ago

        He goes straight to voicemail.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

          *Arab accent over intercom* "Your eminence, you-know-who is on the phone again..."

          "Send to voicemail!"

          "Yes, your eminence."

          "Oh, and talk to PBX provider, see if we can put that number on permanent block."

          "Right away, your eminence."

  58. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    COVID case counts rising again

    Zzz...

  59. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Massachusetts is revising down its COVID death count. The state "will start using a new public health surveillance definition next week that will result in 4,081 deaths once linked to the virus being recategorized as stemming from other causes," NBC 10 Boston reports.

    The COVID Nuremberg trials can't come soon enough.

  60. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    A look inside the 1st official ‘safe injection sites’ in US

    The picture on that article is a target rich environment. Both people masked to protect each other from a disease with way over 99% survivability.

    A white man standing over a black man who's an addict, assisting him in the process of injecting a dangerous substance into his arm. Systemic racism indeed.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      Another New Yorker in Congress, Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney, is a leading sponsor of an addiction-fighting proposal that could make money available for such facilities. Organizers say the New York sites currently run on private donations, though their parent group gets city and state money for syringe exchange, counseling and many other services offered alongside the consumption rooms.

      Remember how we were told that no public monies were used in these sites? Is that the definition of gas-lighting.

      "Oh, but the funds are strictly firewalled"

      Ok, since the group gets public money for only "syringe exchange, counseling and many other services offered alongside the consumption rooms", let's take that public money away and see what finances shift around by the site operator to continue to run the site.

      This is a bit like saying, "Diane only gets public money for xer rent, not for the hookers and blow."

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      Several state and city officials have embraced them. But they also fueled a December protest that drew over 100 people, including U.S. Rep. Adriano Espaillat, a New York Democrat, to complain that drug programs in general are unfairly concentrated in the injection sites’ neighborhoods and kept out of whiter, wealthier areas.

      I think I just found some legit systemic racism.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      People bring their own drugs — of whatever type — to the consumption rooms, but they’re stocked with syringes, alcohol wipes, straws for snorting, other paraphernalia and, crucially, oxygen and the opioid-overdose-reversing drug naloxone.

      Right, so that means the site allows people to 'inject safely' is a bit of a misnomer. They may be in fact injecting very dangerously, which means the site helps them overdose safely It's a subtle distinction, but an important one.

      1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        They might shoot a fatal dose, but lower odds of getting an infection, so a win.

        1. perlhaqr   3 years ago

          "We've secretly replaced Joe's heroin with 100% pure carfentanyl, and his naloxone with saline. Let's see if he notices!"

  61. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

    The reason for this isn't necessarily the hostility to individualism, although it's certainly a keystone of leninist/maoist thought. The reason for it is because by emphasizing ethnic and racial identity, the left can assert that there is a "black" community/culture, "Chicano/Hispanic/Latinxxxxxxxxxx" community, "Asian-Pacific" community, etc. each with its own collective experiences in being oppressed by white people. Conversely, that's also why they say there's no such thing as a "white" community or culture, because oppressors do not possess such things do to the unequal balance of power. That's why you get those two female knuckle-draggers at Arizona State who told the white kid that white people have no culture.

    It's nothing more than a means to divide populations into the oppressor/oppressed dialectic that's inherent to the marxist religion.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

      Whoops, should have had this quoted in there:

      "If you want to discourage projecting averages onto individuals, you should do that with all kinds of people" and not just when it's convenient for progressive politics, he writes. "If the idea is that we should pay a lot less attention to demographic identity because these groupings always distort who we are as individuals, I say, yeah! I'm on board. But that attitude usually offends the social justice set."

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

      This is also the reason that the left keeps expanding the LGBTQIAJMFDXS... acronym as well, as a means to provide white people with a way to identify with an "oppressed" class and grow their mob of malcontents.

      1. JimboJr   3 years ago

        Also since the Pride! people are now an accepted oppressed yet celebrated group, the pedos have a very convenient excuse for pushing sexuality and conversations about sexual preferences on children.

        1. Ali Akbar Alexander   3 years ago

          See? That’s another thing about today’s GOP. They’re totally cool about the LGBTQIA community. Did you see that Republican convention? Well, I was there representing the G and Black communities and that thing was gay AF. The GOP is like a rainbow coalition and, plus, not trying to put Black and gay men on a liberal Welfare plantation alongside Jesse Fucking Jackson. No thanks! Democrats are the real fascists!

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 years ago

            Sad...

          2. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

            What a shock that you'd zero in on the post mentioning pedophilia, you slack-jawed, slope-foreheaded hicklib.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        The more intersections your grid has, the more intersectionality you have.

  62. Young Rydberg   3 years ago

    State rescinds FART license plate.

    What an outrage! This is a totally ridiculous use of state employees who could otherwise being doing the legitimate work of rescinding license plates with a "lgbfjb" string of text.

  63. DRM   3 years ago

    Hint: If you're not utterly ignorant of US tax policy and law, the passage "gross receipts of less than $25,000 claiming an earned income tax credit" in the press release immediately makes you go "Well, of course those are being checked, that's basic and necessary fraud prevention".

    See, the fundamental problem with ENB's story here is that she's calling these people "taxpayers". $25,000 is, of course, just under the level of the standard deduction for joint filers (with $18,800 being the single head-of-household number). So these are not going to be filings from people paying income tax. Instead, they are going to be filings in order to be paid, thanks to the Earned Income Tax Credit, the Child Tax Credit, and many other welfare payments administered through the tax code by the IRS.

    And it should be incredibly obvious that if any entity making payments does not engage in even basic checks for payment eligibility, there will be massive numbers of fraudulent claims made.

    1. JimboJr   3 years ago

      ummmm no. Any action to verify that a program is being used the way it was set up is racism, as it disproportionately affects POCs. And white supremacy

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        iNsTiToOsHuNaL rAcE wArFaRe!

  64. Utkonos   3 years ago

    JOHN CLEESE of all people gets deplatformed by having his mic taken away for a “controversial “ joke?!?!?!
    https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0efheKZV?pd=05vSRvT0&lang=en_US&s=i16
    As far as I’m concerned that’s it my friends! The collapse of civilization is nigh!!!!

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      The comedian and actor was attending a John Cleese in Conversation event at SXSW

      I found John Cleese's mistake.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

        Cleese asked his fellow panelists who was more oppressed by colonisation and started discussing “competition” between cultures.

        “[People] get competitive about this business of being oppressed,” Cleese said. “You do know the British have been slaves twice, right?”

        According to The Hollywood Reporter, Sloan then took away Cleese’s microphone, saying: “I saved a comic whose career I respect”.

        Cleese continued regardless, adding: “I want reparations from Italy.”

        He continued: “And then the Normans came over in 1066… they were horrible people from France and they colonised us for 30 years and we need reparations there too, I’m afraid.”

        Making light of the situation as Cleese continued in spite of his fellow comedians trying to stop him, moderator Dan Pasternack told the audience: “And this is why your phones are locked up.”

        LMFAO! Woke assholes so afraid of people who pay to come to their events that they won't allow them phones. And then taking the mic from Cleese at his own discussion. There is no peak for irony any more. It is a logarithmic curve with these fuckers.

        1. Utkonos   3 years ago

          John Cleese is more than capable of tearing all this nonsense down with one pithy sentence. I pray he does so instead of apologizing (TIS A MISTAKE! RUN AWAY RUN AWAY FROMIT!)

          1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   3 years ago

            Something like this perhaps?

            HERBERT: He's come to rescue me, Father.
            LANCELOT: Well, let's not jump to conclusions.
            FATHER: Did you kill all those guards?
            LANCELOT: Uh... Oh, yes. Sorry.
            FATHER: They cost fifty pounds each!
            LANCELOT: Well, I'm awfully sorry. Um, I really can explain everything.
            HERBERT: Don't be afraid of him, Sir Lancelot. I've got a rope all ready.
            FATHER: You killed eight wedding guests in all!
            LANCELOT: Well, uh, you see, the thing is, I thought your son was a lady.
            FATHER: I can understand that.

            1. Utkonos   3 years ago

              Well, I got A letter….

  65. Alan@.4   3 years ago

    While there are certainly a lot more tax filers in the low to moderate income tax brackets than at the top end, it remains that the antics of the IRS could well stand a hellish lot of questioning and explaining.

  66. Arcxjo   3 years ago

    If you're making under $25K, you take the standard deduction and as long as your W2 matches what your employer reported, you're golden, because not even the government is that stupid.

    The only way that "low-income" earners are getting audited is if they're self-employed and their deductions are consistently more than they made -- i.e. fraudsters.

  67. Aloy Parker   3 years ago

    A rare bad article at Reason (shame shame shame) about the poor being more likely to be audited. These "Correspondence Audits" are letters that are automatically generated by computer as a result of a clear mistake in your tax filing (e.g. missing entry or arithmetic error) or a mismatch between what you reported and what the IRS (computer) independently received from W2 and 1099 reporters. Sending the letters doesn't involve IRS auditors at all. Also these types of errors will be detected by the computer pretty much 100% of the time. The statistics make sense when you consider that low income filers are probably more likely to make those kinds of mistakes. If you don't respond to the letter you will be billed, if you do respond then an IRS person may have to look at it.

  68. Utkonos   3 years ago

    Senate Unanimously Votes To Make Day Light Savings Time Permanent
    https://share.newsbreak.com/o9cired9
    I’d rather it be Standard Time but I’ll take what I can get! (Seriously, if it takes politicians this long to remedy a “temporary measure” meant to help defeat Kaiser Wilhelm but which has been gratuitously screwing with sleep cycles for 100+ years, why do we keep trusting them with more and more powers?)

    1. Utkonos   3 years ago

      Aw jeeze I just flagged myself. Well good bye fellow writ prose!

  69. tkamenick   3 years ago

    So no mention at all that "low income" and "poor" are not the same thing? Don't conflate the two. No discussion of the possibility that a large portion of these audits may be of people fraudulently claiming a low income?

  70. Liberty Lover   3 years ago

    The article tells us little. Are these people filing 1040EZ or are they itemizing with massive deductions? We know large itemization for any income will get you audited. They may be perfectly legit, like healthcare, but they kick you out for audit anyway. That would also be interesting to know.

    1. markm23   3 years ago

      If you're poor enough to get the EITC, your standard deduction is just about certain to be much more than itemized deductions. You didn't have enough to spend on deductible expenses.

      If the audits actually have something to do with the EITC, it's either an entirely fraudulent return (fake ID and fake W2) to get the EITC refund, or the same child claimed on two or more returns. (That often happens just because multiple caregivers aren't talking to each other.)

      If the EITC is merely being used as an indicator of low income, there are several things that could be suspicious. Someone who lacked the computer skills to do a free on-line return may have fouled up the arithmetic or left something off of a hand-written return. (Or the IRS scanner misread something.) Or someone dubiously claimed employee expenses - If you're barely literate and low IQ, it's easy to avoid understanding that your boss's boss's boss can deduct a private jet, but you can't deduct driving 10 miles to work. Or you managed to keep enough money in the bank to earn 51 cents interest and didn't round that up to 1 dollar and report it...

  71. markm23   3 years ago

    "My guess is that they claimed the EIC but didn't included the eligible child's Social Security number." More likely, the IRS computers found the same child's SSN on two or more returns. The parents are divorced, or never were married. Over a year, the kid has lived with the mother, the father, an aunt, and a grandmother, but the 1040 doesn't let them each claim 1/4 child. In a functional family of people intelligent enough to understand how the tax system works, they'd get together and agree on which one gets to claim the child, but maybe the police are called whenever all of them get together in one room... Or they agreed, but one reneged when she found how much that took from her tax refund, or they're all dishonest and too stupid to understand that comparing the SSN's between different returns is one thing computers are very good at.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

South Carolina County Ends Its Civil Forfeiture Blitz After 20 Years

Rob Johnson and Daryl James | 6.17.2025 1:45 PM

How Much of Trump's 'Built in America' Phone Is Actually Built in America?

Jack Nicastro | 6.17.2025 1:00 PM

Lab-Grown Salmon Gets FDA Approval

Emma Camp | 6.17.2025 11:12 AM

Why You Should Care About the Club World Cup (If Your Team or Rival Is In It)

Jason Russell | 6.17.2025 10:50 AM

'Evacuate Tehran'

Eric Boehm | 6.17.2025 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!