Ohio's Taxman Is Tailgating NASCAR
The state's tax commissioner claims NASCAR owes Ohio more than $549,000 in unpaid taxes merely because the state's residents watched NASCAR races on television.

During Prohibition, souped-up cars that could outrun the cops made for successful bootlegging. Today the corporation that runs America's most successful stock car racing series, NASCAR, is likewise trying to get out in front of some meddlesome agents of the state.
Jeff McClain, Ohio's tax commissioner, claims NASCAR owes the state more than $549,000 in unpaid taxes merely because Ohioans watched NASCAR races on television. McClain says that money is due under Ohio's commercial activity tax (CAT), a 0.64 percent levy on the gross receipts of any business that earns at least $1 million in the state. The Ohio Department of Revenue collects about $2 billion annually from the CAT, which it says companies must pay "for the privilege of doing business in Ohio."
Last year, the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals, a quasi-judicial entity, sided with McClain. NASCAR, which is based in Florida, appealed that decision to the Ohio Supreme Court, which will hear the case later this year.
NASCAR says it pays tax on revenue earned at events in Ohio and on the direct sale of merchandise to consumers in Ohio. The state's attempt to claim a share of TV revenue, NASCAR argues in court documents, is a "remarkable position" that would "automatically apply the CAT to revenue ranging from baseball teams in California to makers of YouTube cat videos, and everything in between." NASCAR's lawyers told the court this expansive scheme violates the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause, which gives Congress the sole power to regulate interstate commerce.
The case is the latest tax spat to arise in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair, which dealt with whether online retailers owed states sales tax. The justices held that a state could collect sales tax from a business with a significant economic presence, or "nexus," in that state, even if the firm did not have a physical presence there.
Defining "nexus" is tricky, and so far the issue has not been addressed by the courts or Congress. In claiming taxes on NASCAR's television revenue, Ohio is trying to accelerate a cross-country revenue drive. The state Supreme Court should apply the brakes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Technically, even under Ohio's interpretation that TV broadcasts are taxable, isn't the television station/network that broadcast NASCAR the entity that is doing business in Ohio, and not NASCAR?
NASCAR is selling broadcast rights to the broadcaster, NASCAR isn't selling directly to Ohio consumers.
Ohio's interpretation is akin to taxing Nike because Nike sells to wholesalers and retailers who are actually the entities selling shoes in a state.
This isn't to say Ohio won't win, as they're playing on their home court.
This seems correct unless NASCAR does it's own broadcast like the Yankeees do.
[JOIN NOW] I really make A LOT OF MONEY ($200-$300/hour) online from my laptop. Last month I received almost $50,000. this line work is simple and straightforward. You don’t need to go to the office, it’s online work from home. etg You become independent after joining this position. I really appreciate my friend.
...
Who pointed it out to me SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
NASCAR sells to Fox in California.
Fox in California sells to station in Ohio.
There's no nexus for NASCAR in Ohio.
as they're playing on their home court.
Really, mixed sports metaphors? Go sit in the penalty box.
NASCAR should black out broadcasts in Ohio, and offer to tell about that in a campaign ad for McLain (or whoever appoints him).
Just make the screen display "This race not shown in Ohio due to Jeff McClain, Ohio Tax Commissioner. $ADDRESS $OFFICE_PHONE"
Yes, this exactly.
"Taxman"
1,2,3,4
Hrmm!
1,2...
1,2,3,4.
Let me tell you how it will be
There's one for you, nineteen for me
Cos I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
Should five per cent appear too small
Be thankful I don't take it all
Cos I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
If you drive a car, I'll tax the street
If you try to sit, I'll tax your seat
If you get too cold I'll tax the heat
If you take a walk, I'll tax your feet
Taxman!
Cos I'm the taxman, yeah I'm the taxman
Don't ask me what I want it for (Aahh Mr. Wilson)
If you don't want to pay some more (Aahh Mr. Heath)
Cos I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
Now my advice for those who die
Declare the pennies on your eyes
Cos I'm the taxman, yeah, I'm the taxman
And you're working for no one but me
Taxman!
Quit giving California ideas. The ideas for taxing out of state residents and businesses are supposed to originate in California.
>> souped-up cars that could outrun the cops made for successful bootlegging.
explains all the "drive it like you stole it" in my blood.
If it gets to SCOTUS seeing how they ruled in South Dakota v. Wayfair (unconstitutionally), you know how they'll rule here. Taxman Uber Alles.
> The case is the latest tax spat to arise in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2018 ruling in South Dakota v. Wayfair[.]
"The case is the latest tax spat to arise in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's 2018 fuckup in South Dakota v. Wayfair[.]"
There we go.
Fuck up or deliberate? I'm in one of the few states that actually taxes the shipping charges along with the purchase price, a nice fat 10%.
deliberate. revisit Marbury!
Well, I'm sure they did it deliberately, which doesn't stop me from calling the decision a fuckup, or the people who made it a bunch of fuckups. 😉
That they intentionally fucked things up doesn't mean things aren't fucked up.
The core problem is that the Supreme Court ruled companies can't charge sales tax on out of state customers. Imagine how much simpler it would be if businesses were taxed based on the business location instead of the customer location, as it is with brick and mortar stores. No store ever asks what my home state is when I buy in a store.
One of the reasons this will never be undone is that states love being able to hand out special tax deals. Can you imagine how much Amazon or Microsoft would howl if the they had to pay WA sales tax on all sales?
Plus there would still be the problem of nexus. When Amazon ships from a warehouse in Podunk, Georgia, is that nexus, and do they have to charge Podunk, Georgia tax on all products shipping from that warehouse? At least it would be simpler than having to calculate specific sales tax for all the 100,000 different sales tax jurisdictions in the US.
> Can you imagine how much Amazon or Microsoft would howl if the they had to pay WA sales tax on all sales?
Probably as much as they howled when this came through since before that they didn't have to pay anyone sales tax on sales outside of WA. So this only made things worse for businesses from a financial perspective, in addition to the absurd increase in technical complexity complying with the however many thousand different sales tax jurisdictions there are.
The core problem is that the Supreme Court ruled companies can't charge sales tax on out of state customers.
That is not a problem, it is blessed miracle. The States are properly responsible for collecting their own fucking taxes when their citizens make out of state purchases through Use Tax.
The fact that Use Taxes are difficult to enforce on private citizens is another blessed miracle.
I watch NASCAR® over the air with an indoor antenna. What's .64% of free?
$3.48.
Please remit by the 15th to avoid late fees.
A related question. Why does NASCAR® let them put on fresh tires for overtime sessions? It's not fair for the leader.
Seems tangential rather than related.
Perfectly valid, tires do actually grip tangentially to the road surface.
Are all those pilots and flight attendants paying Ohio state income taxes for the time their planes are over the Buckeye state?
So by this twisted logic, if a local station pays to air a movie, Warner Brothers owes Ohio tax money. What about commercials that air? Are advertisers going to have to pay a state tax? What about billboards seen by Ohio citizens in Indiana? Can they tax that? This is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of.
This is their hope. They just need to con the courts that OTA is a valid nexus.
Maybe Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky, Indiana, and Michigan tax men will determine that Ohio broadcasters owe them taxes since they at least some proportion of residents receive those broadcasts that result from the commercial activity of those broadcasters, even PBS stations.
I'm actually startled that Canadia isn't already taxing these broadcasts.