Russia Is Getting Canceled
Plus: Remembering life before smartphones, Biden's SOTU may pay lip service to deficit hawks, and more...

Russia is getting deplatformed from the world. The war in Ukraine is in many ways a traditional military clash involving tanks, missiles, diplomats, and supply lines. But nonstate actors have started taking sides—well, taking one side—in ways that the world hasn't seen before, with private sector businesses and international organizations responding to Russia's attack on its neighbor by cutting ties with Moscow, and in some cases sacrificing huge sums of money. Combined with the sanctions imposed by the United States and Europe (and perhaps motivated by them too), this mass exodus of foreign capital is demonstrating how the market can punish even powerful states for dangerous and unjustified behavior.
Shell, General Motors, BP, and other major firms have announced plans to leave Russia. FedEx and Germany-based shipping firm DHL are suspending deliveries to Russia, and Denmark-based Maersk, the world's largest container shipping company, says it is considering suspending all shipments to Russia.
"Companies are basically saying, 'We don't want to be part of this,'" Nick Tsafos, an expert on energy and geopolitics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, tells The Washington Post. The Post notes that some of these moves are being made despite huge costs: Shell is abandoning several joint projects with Russia-based Gazprom, sacrificing more than $3 billion.
When the Cold War ended, Bloomberg reports, businesses poured into Russia to take advantage of a freshly open market with millions of new customers and the country's vast natural resources. The past few days have been a stunning reversal of that same rush, with energy companies, major international law firms, and exporters either announcing plans to scale down their operations in Russia or exit the country entirely:
The list of those cutting ties or reviewing their operations is growing by the hour as foreign governments ratchet up sanctions against Russia, close airspace to its aircraft and lock some banks out of the SWIFT money messaging system. With the ruble plunging and the U.S. banning transactions with the Russian central bank, operating in Russia has become deeply problematic. Some companies have concluded that the risks, both reputational and financial, are too great to continue.
The exodus is not limited to "hard" industries like energy and banking. Entertainment companies and the organizers of international sporting events have moved swiftly to exclude, cancel, and ban Russia. Disney is canceling all future film releases in Russia. The upcoming Batman film will not be released in Russia, Warner Bros. announced. And Netflix said Monday that it will not comply with new Russian rules requiring that it carry state television programming, a decision that will likely result in the streaming service being banned from Russian internet networks.
Even FIFA, the hideously corrupt international body that governs global soccer and organizes the World Cup, is taking action against Russia. After several European national teams said they would refuse to play Russia in upcoming World Cup qualifying matches, FIFA announced on Monday that it would give Russia the boot.
We are witnessing the first geopolitical 'cancellation' of the 21st century.
— Jason Willick (@jawillick) February 28, 2022
Thankfully, some companies that may help ordinary Russians survive what is likely to be a devastating economic collapse are refusing the join the parade. Binance and Coinbase, the world's two largest cryptocurrency exchanges, have promised not to unilaterally ban all Russian users.
In a statement to Vice, Coinbase said it would work to block "accounts and transactions" linked to targets of sanctions but would allow other Russians to use the service. "Our mission is to increase economic freedom in the world," the company said via a spokesperson. "A unilateral and total ban would punish ordinary Russian citizens who are enduring historic currency destabilization as a result of their government's aggression against a democratic neighbor."
That's a tricky balance to strike, but one that both governments and private actors must keep in mind as the war continues along both state-based and nonstate fronts. Sanctions and economic warfare will devastate Russian civilians who have nothing to do with—and in many cases actively oppose—their government's horrific actions in Ukraine. War always comes with collateral damage, of course, but steps should be taken to limit that fallout. Companies cutting ties with Russia should follow Coinbase's example whenever possible—though that's not really feasible for nontech firms like BP and Shell.
Meanwhile, Western nations imposing sanctions should also provide an open door to any Russian citizen who wants to escape the economic punishment being aimed at the Putin regime.
Senior EU officials tell me the EU is considering offering qualified Russian ???????? citizens EU ???????? passports - to accelerate Russian economic brain drain
This is just one of many innovative measures being considered to complement economic sanctions now in place ????????????????
— Mujtaba Rahman (@Mij_Europe) March 1, 2022
FREE MINDS
Was life better before smartphones? It's popular to condemn technology for all manner of psychological and social ills, but Matt Ruby offers a few—or, well, actually a lot—of counterpoints. Via his Substack, The Rubesletter:
I used to get lost all the time. I'd ask for directions, look for landmarks, fold maps, carry a guidebook, and keep an atlas in the glove compartment. I never knew when the next train was coming. I waited around a lot.
I memorized phone numbers, jotted things down in notebooks, had conversations with taxi drivers, talked to random people at bars, wrote checks, went to the bank, and daydreamed. I was grossly inefficient and terribly bored. I rarely got what I wanted and, when I did, I had to wait at least 8-10 days for it to be delivered. I was not archived, nor was I searchable; things I said just disappeared forever.
Read the whole thing.
FREE MARKETS
President Joe Biden will deliver the State of the Union address tonight, and he may even pay some lip service to deficit hawks. "President Biden will call on Congress to send him legislation that lowers costs of everyday expenses working families face and lowers the deficit by rewarding work, not wealth," the White House said in a fact sheet distributed to reporters in advance of the speech.
That's an acknowledgment of domestic political reality. After a year of trying and failing to convince Sen. Joe Manchin (D–W.Va.) and other moderate Democrats to support Biden's deficit-inflating "Build Back Better" plan, the White House is apparently ready to try a different approach.
QUICK HITS
• A family that escaped Afghanistan in August is now caught up in the refugee crisis unfolding in Ukraine.
• "Make the State of the Union boring again."
• Russia may have committed a war crime by using a so-called vacuum bomb in Ukraine.
• Periodic reminder that nationalism is collectivist and gross:
This is all nationalism has ever been: Using people as political pawns, cannon fodder, and buffers. pic.twitter.com/DJLhgVskzv
— The Alex Nowrasteh (@AlexNowrasteh) March 1, 2022
• Remote work is proving to be more persistent than expected.
• Don't forget to wear your mask and maintain social distancing while huddling in your nuclear fallout shelter.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Russia is getting deplatformed from the world.
Even from Facebook. At last, our elections are safe.
We better fortify them just to be sure.
Looks like Davos activated their bat signal. Time for American companies to get involved in the Ukraine/Russia war.
Netflix already unleashed their awesome power. What else do you want?
A new season of Peaky Blinders.
Seconded.
With you. And the Last Kingdom too.
Uhtred son of Uhtred approves.
The Last Kingdom is excellent. The books by Bernard Cornwell are excellent as well.
[JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. rbg Last month I got cheek of nearly 30,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go office, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
..
SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
^
As soon as the Beeb finishes showing the season, it'll be on Netflix.
If your nom-de-Reason is in reference to the genre of music, you might find this interesting. From the creator of "Peaky Blinders."
https://britishperioddramas.com/news/steven-knight-early-1980s-two-tone-music-scene-drama-series/
It is - though I'm more into the original Jamaican artists. Still, I'm down with the Two-Tone and will definitely keep my eyes open for a series based on that scene.
I'm still waiting on The Boys.
Also Tribes of Europa was fun.
Their morality of course doesn't extend to China.
A goodwill chess mission to Russia by Beth Harmon, if Russia agrees to replace Putin?
Nyetflix
^Golf clap
Putin is a bloody realist in the face of the completely insane western world. He has said that Russia has abundant energy because of Nuclear power and natural resources. When the west runs out of bluster and energy, the shoe will be on the other foot.
He will say, "I told you so" as he has done many times. Unfortunately, it is against the universal social law to listen to him.
Google has to censor Russian sources, because wouldn't want the peasants getting other perspectives.
So much standing up for freedom!
Russia is getting deplatformed from the world.
Aw, Jeez! Now all the Russia-loving Alt-Right Intellectual Dark Web crowd will be commiserating! Maybe offering themselves as martyr Putineers for Putin!
Can we cancel China too US corporate oligarchs?
Time to end deficit spending, have the Fed stop monetizing the debt and engage only in Free Trade with China (that means neither side puts up tariffs, subsidizes their companies AND don't peg their currency to the others. Better yet settle trade in gold and not fiat currency. That would stop this "China has cheap labor" very quickly
If not another dime drops into Russia,the Oligarchs and Putin still live like kings.Only the people suffer. Just like N Korea.
The truth hurts.
Binance and Coinbase, the world's two largest cryptocurrency exchanges, have promised not to unilaterally ban all Russian users.
OH OF COURSE BITCOINERS. THE FASCISTS.
And totally not to cash in on the ruble panic.
All this righteous corporate posturing about Russia, and at least pretending to sever business relationships means little. Let's see how these same companies respond when China invades Taiwan.
Uh, excuse me, it will be totally different when the People's Republic Of China cracks down on dissidents in the Republic Of China. What we can be sure of is that then, whenever it happens, is not the time for commentary or rash action based on misunderstanding and misinformation. - Brought to you by our corporate sponsor...
There's only One China recognized by the US government so there's no need for Sleepy Joe to head back to Washington when the invasion comes. It's just a strong central government response to an insurrectionist province.
I wonder if Harvard, when they limit admissions for Asian American students, have a way to filter out kids with Taiwan heritage or sympathies.
They added a question to the application for Asian students...if their favorite color is not red...you know they are running dog lackeys.
I would not be surprised.
All incoming students have to love Crimson.
Just quelling an insurrection. Taiwan's existence is the worst attack since the Chinese 9/11. It's like the Civil War plus 9/11 put together. Totally different.
Also NBA and Disney and Apple and Amazon and...
This will be exactly the tone on the MSM. Guaranteed
Totally different. Ukraine is internationally recognized as a sovereign state. Taiwan is simply a self-governing province whose privilege of self determination can be revoked at any time.
They all lined up to do business with an actual genocidal slave-holding state, knowing it was engaged in genocide, but Russian imperialism is a bridge too far.
Normal parameters!
Adults recognize the difference immediately!
China is hopefully considering that reaction right now. China has a lot more to lose by being cut off from the world economy than Russia does.
Wars for territorial control and natural resources are a relic of the more barbaric 20th century. Success in the 21st century depends on the education and skill levels of your citizens, as well as the stability and integrity of your legal, financial and market systems.
If destructive and deadly wars can be prevented by corporate posturing and disengagement with the offending nations, that's a very promising new development. (Of course any new power can and will be used hypocritically, and no doubt abused at some point.)
China will takeover Taiwan w/o military invasion.
It's a much, much, much tougher nut to crack through direct assault.
Right...and the Great War was the war to end all wars. Instead of utopian dreams I'm of the opinion this is going to end up badly for Ukraine and the global government/economy as whole. Instead of reforming Russia seems like the west is trying to choke them to death and that doesn't bode well as they are too big to fail. China will be the biggest winner in all of this.
However they react, it still wouldn't save them from nationalization. Maybe that's what it will take to see the light on Red China.
Taiwan has nuclear weapons, so that would be The Unparalleled Invasion. Taiwan used to be Formosa, the beautiful island where Portuguese and Dutch farmers planted poppies and coca. Prohibitionist arrogance versus European trader connivance killed roughly 25 million Chinese in the Opium Wars and religious Taeping Rebellion. What was left on the mainland degenerated into communist slavery and dreams of threatening Taiwan.
The upcoming Batman film will not be released in Russia
Thank God Russkies don't have access to bit torrenting.
People still pay for movies? I can guarantee they don't in most of the rest of the non post-industrial world.
and they won't even have to convert their rubles to Bitcoin, because they already have
.. send him legislation that lowers costs of everyday expenses working families face..
Why didn’t they do this before? Absolute genius.
FJB
Remember this when their "solution" is price controls rather than market-oriented fixes. There's no economic crisis the government won't use to increase meddling in the economy.
Get woke! Prices are just arbitrary numbers that evil corporations use to extort money from oppressed people. Its about time we used Democracy! to impose some economic equity.
Cynthia Nixon? Is that you?
Was life better before smartphones?
The coming thermonuclear war will help us find out.
Be safe and order three years of Daytimer now!
I don't know if life was necessarily "better," but the release of the iPhone is definitely a technological watershed that marked the decline and eventual death of the internet as most of us remember it. Prior to it being released, you had to deliberately set time aside to get online and do stuff, so the internet was still relatively dominated by tech geeks, and interaction by normies was mostly limited to news and maybe a few niche blogs.
Smartphones set off the explosion in social media, particularly utter toxic waste sites like Tumblr, that allowed people to basically be online all the fucking time. It's a Pavlovian device that encourages nonstop use, from it's constant "dings" for notifications to the sweeet dopamine hits from social media updoots. A lot of our current social dysfunction can be traced to the ubiquitousness of these things.
The irony is that Steve Jobs just wanted an easier way for people to download stuff from iTunes and increase revenue in that area, and decided that integrating the phone, internet, and iPod in to one device was the best way to do that. I don't think he really expected people to be on the internet all the damn time posting shit on social media instead of buying songs from Apple.
When smartphones were released, the whole concept of the internet as a free exchange of ideas and alternate perspectives outside the establishment had an expiration date, although we didn't realize it at the time. Something like that is just too easy of a target for authoritarians to exploit--they can not only track your every move, because it has a GPS, but it's even easier to justify spying on your browsing history for wrongthink.
The smartphone is the greatest invention since the automobile.
You just have to stay off anti-social media.
Sure, and I am, but my lack of participation is a drop of water taken out of the Pacific Ocean.
This is pretty much my take on it. We had smartphones before the iPhone, but with poor internet connectivity, low ease-of-use, and an immature (and pre-monopolistic) social media sector. Once all that changed, the things turned into catalysts for idiocracy.
Smartphones can be used as radiation meters. They are way better than the baked sheetrock and bits of tinfoil approach of the 1980s.
President Joe Biden will deliver the State of the Union address tonight...
The level of stimulants they're going to have to pump into him, it might be his final.
It will be like nascar, just watch it waiting for a crash.
"We now go to the Progressive Response."
This was good enough to be its own comment.
Brandon AND AOC? I can't even...
It's that ugly-ass Tlaib.
There are now 2 progressive responses to their own SOTU.
It is hilarious.
That big tent is collapsing quickly.
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaat
Lol, I just looked it up. Yep.
https://news.yahoo.com/rep-rashida-tlaib-respond-bidens-113257860.html
And other one.
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2022/03/01/dallas-rep-colin-allred-to-give-congressional-black-caucus-response-to-bidens-state-of-the-union/
I'm sure he'll be napping all day to prepare.
It makes the blood transfusions easier.
And the transfusions of Boost and Jello Pudding.
As usual, the Bee has it covered - - - -
https://babylonbee.com/news/state-of-the-union-will-just-be-90-minute-broadcast-of-dumpster-engulfed-in-flames
That could be the new 24/7/365 channel on Pluto.tv 🙂
Reminded me of the WPIX--TV Yule Log.
https://youtu.be/VEx4KMzPegc
By next year they can go with Animatronic Joe. Robots like Ameca are already more lifelike:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzBUm31Vn3k
And then when his term is over, they can just sell the android to Disney for their Hall of Presidents Minus One.
hopefully it will be the shortest to go with his short attention span
President Biden will call on Congress to send him legislation that lowers costs of everyday expenses working families face and lowers the deficit by rewarding work, not wealth...
So the price of the access Hunter's paintings buys is going down?
rewarding work
He worked really hard on those paintings!
So, what he's saying is that he wants congress to introduce a bill that repeals anything he has done since he's been in office.
Works for me, he's been in office since before I was born. Let's reset back to a 1970's era level of deficit spending and debt.
Thank god the government has the power to set prices.
They will after Congress passes price controls on all those pesky items like food and fuel. It's really too bad government doesn't have the power to make people produce products at a loss.
Soviet style bread [and everything else] lines to follow; of course Comrade Sanders said those were good, "because it meant people were getting food."
The lines will be longer because you have to stand 6 feet apart .
Will you need photo ID to get your bread, or just a vax passport (with a photo ID to prove it’s you)?
You will, but there's still the election line loophole. Just say that you're there to vote and they'll wave you through.
If the line gets too long, their will be a COVID booster station mid-way, in case yours expires.
I've sold all my rubles and Canadian dollars to buy Hunter Biden NFTs.
Russia Is Getting Canceled
Russia Russia? The landmass, the people, the language, the culture, all of it? Like 'Africa is getting canceled' or 'Mexico is getting canceled'? I mean, I'm all for cancelling shit holes but I know some people are averse to celebrating that sort of thing.
Nobody cancelled Canada or Australia. Odd.
It's totally fine to conduct warfare against your own citizens, you're just not allowed to conduct warfare against other people's citizens.
My citizens, my choice.
Especially when there’s clear evidence of White Supremacy™️ and documented violence, like with the truckers.
Right, in that case you're basically obligated to get violent or you're just as bad as the racists.
...uh oh
https://twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1498535111482122245?t=WYpTZIlHAurIRGnJCvaAOw&s=19
As US media celebrated average Ukrainian citizens taking up arms against Russian troops, the ultra-nationalist Azov Battalion's National Corps published a propaganda video of its fighters training and passing out arms to residents of Kharkiv, transforming them into combatants.
From an FBI indictment of US white nationalists who trained with Azov/National Corps: "Azov...is known for its association with neo-Nazi ideology...[and] is believed to have participated in training and radicalizing US-based white supremacy organizations."
[Link]
It's totally fine to conduct warfare against your own citizens, you're just not allowed to conduct warfare against other people's citizens.
Are you saying the Russians living in the Ukraine aren't citizens because they live on the other side of an imaginary construct? 🙂
That was the good kind of Aggression.
Russian aggression
Is this the new buzzword? I've seen it in like three Reason headlines so far.
Yup. The newest thing that Serious People can feel strongly against.
They're selling I Stand With Ukraine masks on the internets, so Serious People can feel extra super good about themselves.
Capitalism!
An invasion to grab territory is pretty aggressive.
That's what the Neanderthals said.
Not aggressive, Aggression. When was the last time the entire institutional machinery called anything Aggression? It just seems bizarre.
and descriptive.
Seems like a reasonable word to use.
That's an acknowledgment of domestic political reality.
I think the acknowledgement of the domestic political reality was when they started sowing doubt in the upcoming midterms.
War always comes with collateral damage, of course, but steps should be taken to limit that fallout.
Failing that, at least shelter from it. 8-(
And wear a mask.
Well that is very important when you shelter; and don't let too many in because social distancing....don't want to catch a cold when you are trying escape radioactive fallout you know.
The Koch fortune is built on commerce with Stalin's Soviet Union and Hitler's Nazi Germany.
A family that escaped Afghanistan in August is now caught up in the refugee crisis unfolding in Ukraine.
They're moving to Taiwan next.
Is the family name Donner?
So fucking clever/snarky/snide of you. Fuck off fake libertarian.
Dude relax. Its FOE making his rounds. The fact that he's still posting here after the great breakup is a blessing.
Dilate more, shitlib.
That's what I was going for.
'golf clap'
Hoes mad.
Kind of an odd one to get worked up over.
"Make the State of the Union boring again."
So the ladies shouldn't wear all white in solidarity with Tara Reade?
Make the State of the Union boring again
We can't worry about the state of our union, there's a war on!
I used to get lost all the time. I'd ask for directions
"Oh, you're WAYYYYY off!" (Props to Roney Dangerfield.)
*Rodney*
*** gets coffee ***
Real men don't ask for directions. We die in the woods.
Actual real men know what they are doing and where they are going. Modern neutered real men posers try to act like actual real men and die in the woods.
Orienteering is a dying skill. I doubt I could even compensate for magnetic north anymore.
It will be noted in the margin of a decent map.
And you can't even call it that any more.
Terrain feature navigation FTW.
That explains why you're dead and being eaten by coyotes.
Didn't you say you were too scared and incompetent to carry a weapon when decrying how awful it was Rittenhouse wasn't guilty of murder?
Hey troll. You missed a post.
Here.
https://reason.com/2022/03/01/russia-is-getting-canceled/?comments=true#comment-9380720
And there's five posts of mine on this thread that you haven't shit on.
https://reason.com/2022/03/01/why-cant-we-build-anything/?comments=true#comments
Get busy troll. You're slacking.
Poor sarc.
Lol. You're sad. And pathetic.
Want me to link the Rittenhouse post?
Needs more bear selfies.
"Turn left where the old schoolhouse USED to be"
(also Rodney Dangerfield)
I learned to travel by asking if my target was in a specific direction, because I could differentiate yes and a finger pointing elsewhere, while "past the schoolhouse and turn left at the bridge" was too many possibly unfamiliar words.
"I was a little off. We're not on Route 35. We're on Jackrabbit Road. And we're not in Pennsylvania, we're in West Virginia"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76aw4DTusNo&t=186s
followed by
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeEFsMpJcmI
...when they finally get there, very late.
"Periodic reminder that nationalism is collectivist and gross"
Ugh. For sure. Totally gross.
Know what's not gross? Analyzing the war in Ukraine in terms of its potential to create refugees who might end up in the US where they can provide cost-effective labor for Charles Koch, the billionaire who funds Reason.com.
#CheapLaborAboveAll
I thought Ukrainian nationalism was suddenly good. Did that change since last night?
Nationalism bad. Collectivism bad. Ukraine good. Russia Bad. BOWF SIDEZ!
Only approximately 12 hours remain until Sleepy Joseph Brandon Robinette Biden Jr. finally reveals himself to the world as the second coming manifestation of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, lifts his arms, utters a divine incantation, and performs the miracle whereby he eliminates the Covid 19 plague from existence and ends the global pandemic in an instant.
This is certainly going to be his most incredible accomplishment since he resurrected himself, moved aside the stone, and exited his own tomb roughly 2,000 years ago.
and performs the miracle whereby he eliminates the Covid 19 plague from existence and ends the global pandemic in an instant
Uncle Joe's so amazing.
I bet the mask comes off, dramatically. But probably no hat top to Trump for expediting the vaccines.
This is all nationalism has ever been: Using people as political pawns, cannon fodder, and buffers.
What if your national identity is being pawns?
[sic] political buffers
I identify as pH ~7.4, to be sure.
So you're neutral about most everything?
Seems a little bit basic to me.
Battered Nation Syndrome.
This is all nationalism has ever been: Using people as political pawns, cannon fodder, and buffers.
This is all globalism has been so far. Using people as political pawns, cannon fodder, and buffers while ushering in a new age of imperialism under globohomo.
The system nationalism replaced wasn't better and concentrated rule over hugely diverse populations in the hands of a few imperial elites. And reviving this system is what the globalists are struggling for and it will be even more destructive than nationalism.
How dare you. Everyone knows the Great Reset will empower the individual.
"Make the State of the Union boring again."
Require the President to handwrite a letter to Congress from time to time. Use pens made from pardoned-turkey feathers.
And sustainably sourced ink?
Or written in their own blood, to incentivize keeping it short.
I think you're onto something here. Only we extend it to Congress, and mandate that every bill up for a vote has to be written out, longhand, in their own blood, with a quill pen, in at least a 12 point font, by the primary sponsor. Alone.
I bet they'd get shorter quickly.
Remote work is proving to be more persistent than expected.
We can't have the economy completely shut down again for the next pandemic.
Don't forget to wear your mask and maintain social distancing while huddling in your nuclear fallout shelter.
And for fuck sake, recycle your MRE packages.
And remember: "If it's yellow, let it mellow."
True eco-warriors drink their pee.
So does Kevin Costner.
See, those Hollywood types sure know how to Science!
You might need to get a job.
JFC, who has the time to shit post on here like you do. At this point like 90% of the posts on this are all you.
Get a life man.
FoE has been first on the Mourning Lynx for at least a decade. Don't spit in his milk.
JFC, who has the time to shit post on here like you do. At this point like 90% of the posts on this are all you.
Oooh! Somebody's jealous!
No employer would allow me divert from my work the substantial amount of brainpower I obviously use crafting my comments for those 20 minutes a day.
Raspberry has never had an employer, or a job, so it wouldn't understand.
Raspberries hasn't heard of smartphones and apparently is sitting on his computer to post.
+1 dial up modem.
At the library.
Where else do you want homeless people to spend their day?
That made me think of J sub D for some weird reason. Poor guy.
What happened?
And yet you came here and posted this.
It's fucking delightful how ass-blasted you are at a long-time poster who primarily just puts up a bunch of jokes in the morning.
The fact that you and White Mike both dislike him confirms his status as one of the best posters here.
The fact that Dee doesn’t understand what Fist is doing confirms he’s autistic.
It's a good thing I got those 4 tests in the mail. I'm set for the apocalypse now.
"Climate change is progressing faster than expected, threatening human health"
[...]
"The environmental and societal impacts of climate change are progressing more rapidly than previously expected, nearing limits to what society can feasibly adapt to, according to a recent report..."
https://www.healio.com/news/primary-care/20220228/climate-change-is-progressing-faster-than-expected-threatening-human-health
And yet, not a single one of the predictions of doom has been shown to be anywhere close to reality...
In apparent violation of Paris Accord, Russia rapidly accelerates local climate change in the Ukraine in excess of the limits that humans can adapt to.
When will they get to being alive as a risk to human health? Don't we have enough data yet to prove that every living person will almost certainly die?
Is there anything that ClimateChange™ cant do?
Like god, it is so powerful it can't undo itself.
And yet, the simple act of becoming socialist will hold it at bay.
It may be strong enough to end a war - or begin one.
And it's happening much faster than they predicted 20 years ago.
But don't go back and check what was actually predicted 20 years ago, please.
Ukraine is not America's fight
Let's remember this as we think about Russia and Ukraine. There is no vital US national interest at stake. Friends back their friends; America has NATO's back. But this is a European problem that Europeans need to take the lead on solving.
America should not send weapons to Ukraine. America should send their weapons to NATO allies, who can then decide what to do.
One day, the fighting will be over. America should retain the ability to influence events the day after vis a vis the Russians. Russia will respect America for not directly sending weapons to Ukraine. This is an important distinction that seems to be lost.
Also, I am 100% convinced that the American people are being deliberately manipulated into trying to make Ukraine's dispute with Russia an American dispute with Russia. Just look at what the MSM, politicians and 'elites' are all saying. We are being pushed to get more involved and make Ukraine America's fight. NFW.
America has to prepare for a much more important looming conflict: Taiwan.
Taiwan? The elites and corporations will have a very different set of messages about Taiwan.
The American people are being deliberately manipulated into making the Ukraine problem a US problem because it's politically better for Biden to have people focuses on Ukraine and RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA, rather than the crippling inflation at home, or the couple thousand trucks on their way to DC to protest, or talking about what happened in Canada, or paying attention to what's going on with mask mandates and covid "science," or the countless other things Biden has fucked up. The Biden administration is a complete failure on every level, and focusing on Ukraine and RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA lets them off the hook on it for at least as long as it continues.
Yup. Now when there's escalating costs and supply shortages and an energy crisis, he can just say, "It's Russia's fault!" People were starting to catch on when he said the same thing about COVID.
He fucked up the energy issue so bad, he even said it in his speech on Ukraine: "Standing up for freedom has a cost."
They have no intention of backing away from their disasterous and ruinous GND bullshit, and the Ukrainian invasion and any subsequent energy issues- including out of control costs- will be billed as "the cost of defending democracy."
These people are truly and deeply evil. I have no doubt the US will continue to meddle in this mess, just to keep it simmering as long as they can in order to benefit from it as much as possible.
Some of it is Putin's fault. The oil price is manipulated by a cartel and dictators. It's not a free market. These groups are fucking you and you dont seem to understand that.
"Also, I am 100% convinced that the American people are being deliberately manipulated into trying to make Ukraine's dispute with Russia an American dispute with Russia."
This.
We've been all saying for months now that the Democratic Party desperately wanted conflict with Russia so that it could survive or postpone midterms.
And to post-hoc justify their TDS. The aggressive Russians have been trying to destroy America all along and now they're doing it! We have to stop them on behalf of Democracy!
"Let's remember this as we think about Russia and Ukraine. There is no vital US national interest at stake. Friends back their friends; America has NATO's back. But this is a European problem that Europeans need to take the lead on solving."
Let's further remember that the US is but a peripheral and recent agent in what is and has been an extremely long history of issues between what is now Russia and Ukraine:
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK-yJD_fAtk
You and I agree, Sevo. Ukraine is really a European problem. It is their backyard. And Ukraine is a poster child for 'erstwhile ally'.
"Many Capitol riot cases could hinge on 1st trial’s outcome"
[...]
"The Justice Department launched one of the largest and most complex criminal investigations in its history after a mob of Donald Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol over a year ago. Now it’s time for a jury to hear some of the government’s evidence about the unparalleled attack on American democracy.
The first trial for one of the hundreds of Capitol riot prosecutions began this week, with jury selection starting Monday for the case against Guy Wesley Reffitt. The Texas man is charged with bringing a gun onto Capitol grounds, interfering with police officers guarding the building, and threatening his teenage children if they reported him to authorities..."
https://www.capitalgazette.com/news/nation-world/ct-aud-nw-capitol-riot-trials-20220228-fgkwfsd5qfasndkas3hhziw4cu-story.html
They're also eyeing charges of late library book return and creating a nuisance. Really serious stuff here; how long has he been incarcerated?
Carter's fault, as usual.
>and creating a nuisance
Well, at least everyone else on the Group W bench won't have to move away from him while they figure out if he's rehabilitated himself.
Periodic reminder that nationalism is collectivist and gross
Periodic reminder that globalism is imperialist and tyrannical.
If there was only some other option besides nationalism and globalism.
I'm actually a localist, but I still think nationalism is 1000 times better than global imperialism.
And waaaaaaay more collectivist
Nardz has competition for idiot of the week:
"S.F. teachers union official sparks controversy by sharing a social media post blaming the U.S. for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine"
[...]
"“While we do not support the Russian invasion, we reserve our strongest condemnation for the U.S. government, which rejected Russia’s legitimate security concerns in the region, with total intransigence that they knew could provoke such a war,” read the post by Leela Anand of the U.S. Party for Socialism and Liberation..."
https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/S-F-teachers-union-defends-VP-who-shared-post-16958208.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result
Nardz aside, I won't hold my breath waiting for the "Libertarian Socialists Embrace Putin" article from Reason.
Thank god for the teachers, and their efforts to prove that despite some recent statements from the mayor, and regressive results from recall election, SFC is still a national center of retarded leftist insanity.
It's fun watching sqrlvo work himself into a stroke
Sevo versus Nardz.
Now I guess sarcasmic's gay fanfic about the two of you will never come true.
https://reason.com/2021/10/03/how-the-cdc-became-americas-landlord/#comment-9138013
Poor sarcasmic.
Was life better before smartphones?
Yes. I read this article a couple years ago. I thought it was pretty interesting.
https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-erosion-of-deep-literacy
Great article. There are certainly some things that are easier and more convenient due to smart phones, and there is some benefit to having a tiny computer in your pocket that can deliver the collected knowledge of the entire world on demand, wherever you are. But none of that information means anything if you can't read and synthesize it.
I especially liked this point:
"And many, particularly those who have never inculcated the discipline that comes with a serious education, have become, as Senator Ben Sasse puts it, 'addicted to distraction.'"
I don't think technology is bad in itself. I think the lack of serious education among modern people, coupled with the endless stream of bread and circus available on the internet, leads to terrible outcomes.
My son always describe (smart) phones this way;
"I have in my pocket a device that can connect me to almost anyone in the world, and also give me nearly instant access to all the knowledge of mankind. I use it to trade snarky comments with complete strangers, and look at funny pictures of cats.
We have infinite knowledge in our pockets and the magic of instantaneous, face to face communications with anyone on earth, and the best we can come up with is Tik Tok.
This is why we must throw more money at "education"!
Literacy is racist.
Damnit!
If you're looking to Senator Sasse for guidance, you're looking the wrong way.
Russia may have committed a war crime by using a so-called vacuum bomb in Ukraine.
According to the article, they hit a military base with it, so I'm guessing no. We've used thermobaric weapons from Vietnam to Afghanistan (remember the MOAB). They're not banned under international law.
Does a vacuum bomb clean up after itself?
Not if its a guy vacuum bomb.
The Russians use cheap vacuum bombs that spew out nearly as much dust as they vacuum up so when you're done things are as dirty as before - the dirt is just spread out more evenly.
I don't wanna pimp Chinese stuff but Shark vacuum bombs are the shit.
Sharknado bombs?
Dyson vacuum bombs are way overrated. Shark can do the same thing at half the price.
They did, but they are not solar powered, so that function was disabled.
Yeah but we call them fuel-air bombs, and that sounds waayyy less menacing than "vacuum bomb," so its OK when we do it
Yeah. The use of any weapon "could constitute a war crime" if used on civilian populations, but there's nothing especially illegal about bombs that use air as their primary oxidizer.
That The Usual Idiots™ often run around screaming their heads off about fuel-air explosives, cluster munitions, white phosphorous, land mines, depleted uranium, or the like doesn't actually make the use of any of them war crimes, or even particularly notable compared to other weapons of war.
Counterpoint: life was pretty good before smartphones.
- no texts
- no/few spam phone calls
- no idiots walking into shit because they were starting at their phone
- no idiots driving recklessly because they were texting or talking on the phone
- no artificial brain attached to my hand meant I had to actually know how to do stuff like add 2+2
No mean tweets.
- no idiots driving recklessly because they were texting or talking on the phone
?!!
If only. More like driving 10mph under the speed limit, not going when the light goes green and leaving 7 car lengths between cars at the light which causes me major problems with the light cycle is short.
^
Though some of us developed the skill to text w/o looking because there was a numeric keypad. Can't do that with smartphones.
666-44-0-9-33-555-555
Nobody talking on their cell phones while ordering coffee at Dunkin Donuts. That is the rudest thing on earth. I miss manners.
-less communication
-they'd just call your home phone during dinner
-idiots still walked into shit because they were looking at something else, like reading a newspaper
-idiots still drove recklessly because they were distracted by something else, like reading a newspaper (yes, people did this while driving)
-the average person was never able to do stuff like add 2+2 in the first place
-less communication And less tracking. Kids in particular were far more free range. There was the occasional phone booth if you absolutely, positively had to make that call.
-they'd just call your home phone during dinnerBut the Paleolithic phones DID have a ringer shut off.
-idiots still walked into shit because they were looking at something else, like reading a newspaperMaybe, once in a blue, blue moon. Nothing like the distractions of today.
-idiots still drove recklessly because they were distracted by something else, like reading a newspaper (yes, people did this while driving)See above. Sipping coffee. Never saw too many readers driving. People could wait to get the news. The instantaneous need to know was not even close to today.
-the average person was never able to do stuff like add 2+2 in the first placeProbably right there. haha
1. We had pagers.
2. We had more spam phone calls, and had to answer them instead of just ignoring them to voice mail.
3. Who cares?
4. Plenty of idiots drove recklessly then too.
5. True.
2+2=5. Duh.
Don’t need no smartphone for that.
Man, the distracted driving thing is real. While I'll admit that there's almost certainly a factor of my being less of an idiotic young male than I was 25 years ago as part of it, but riding a motorcycle on the street these days is fucking scary as hell. People didn't pay attention to motorcycles before they were rolling around staring at their phones. Now it's insane.
Thankfully, some companies that may help ordinary Russians survive what is likely to be a devastating economic collapse are refusing the join the parade. Binance and Coinbase, the world's two largest cryptocurrency exchanges, have promised not to unilaterally ban all Russian users.
In a statement to Vice, Coinbase said it would work to block "accounts and transactions" linked to targets of sanctions but would allow other Russians to use the service.
The fact that this even COULD be a thing tells you that crypto is not the panacea people make it out to be.
Not your keys, not your coins. This is the crypto equivalent of going after banks (but the banks will roll over 100%).
As we've seen with covid, threatening to revoke businesses licenses is how we do things these days.
"...Even FIFA, the hideously corrupt international body that governs global soccer and organizes the World Cup, is taking action against Russia..."
What's the IOC, chopped liver?
Michel Platini has his own wing in the Corruption Hall of Fame.
I think it's true that we're basically looking at cancel culture here against Putin, but I think it's largely consumer driven. Companies are afraid of consumers associating them with support for Putin and his war like they're afraid of being associated with racism, homophobia, etc. To that extent, it's like cancel culture.
However, I see two important differences:
1) This cancel culture reaction is genuinely a reflection of consumer opinion rather than the righteous indignation of a few thousand Twitter trolls.
The thousands of people who were trying to silence Joe Rogan were not representative of the opinions of average Americans--even if they didn't approve of his speech.
2) Trying to silence Americans for exercising their freedom of speech and trying to avoid supporting companies that profit from Putin's war are two very different motivations.
Saying something racist, homophobic, etc. may be awful, but silencing people for saying something like that really isn't on the same level as killing hundreds or thousands of mothers and their children for refusing to lick your boot. Words can be hurtful, but they're not tanks and missiles.
"...The thousands of people who were trying to silence Joe Rogan were not representative of the opinions of average Americans--even if they didn't approve of his speech..."
This became obvious when the site said 'bu-bye' to Young and kept Rogan; the owners want to make money.
Exactly!
Average Americans don't like racism, but . . . it's not like Joe Rogan ordered the use of cluster bombs on civilian targets.
"I think it's true that we're basically looking at cancel culture here against Putin, but I think it's largely consumer driven"
L
O
L
Not just consumers, but their own employees.
>> It's popular to condemn technology for all manner of psychological and social ills,
alternatively, stop being such a pussy.
British Petroleum and Shell are selling their oil business in Russia short, but look at it from their perspective.
I've read that the reason that long Russian armor convoy has barely moved for a day or two is because they're out of fuel.
If you're BP or Shell, why do you want to be part of Russia's solution to that problem?
When the armor on its way to slaughter the good people of Kyiv got bogged down for lack of fuel, BP and Shell were there to help?
They've already got the climate activists working to destroy their whole business. Just when you didn't think they become any more villainous, they're also behind fueling Putin's war machine?
They didn't sign up for that.
There are a thousand companies with exposure like that. IF IF IF and when China invades Taiwan, we'll see the same thing happen.
I've read that the reason that long Russian armor convoy has barely moved for a day or two is because they're out of fuel.
I find that very hard to believe.
I've stayed mostly quiet on this who Russia Ukraine thing, but this is the strangest war I think I've ever seen in my lifetime.
Here's the front page, above-the-fold story in my local daily:
‘We’ve been here before’: Fatal shooting underscores longtime problems at Seattle’s Third and Pine
If this were a Russian Blitzkrieg, with dive bombers taking out bridges, rolling over towns with tanks and laying siege to major cities, I think that the news would just look different.
Bottom line, I suspect that column isn't moving because Putin doesn't want it to move.
Check this, 2:53 time stamp:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-g1s1K_FCE
The commentary not a lot earlier mentions that the Russian logistical support is very poor, perhaps because Putin hoped for a rapid capitulation?
lol the dummy didn't send enough supplies for a week?
Couldn’t afford them.
Russia has been the beneficiary of such mistakes by invaders, but a less than a week logistic breakdown is awful planning if that is what is happening.
what's Russian for "hey guys, I have a quick job for you. shouldn't take two days ..."
Napoleon and Hitler's staff were both prepared for a campaign of several months, but not for one that lasted into winter; their main mistake was a failure to appreciate how long it took for troops to march to Moscow when they had to fight battles along the way. (The German army in 1941 was just as limited to the speed of marching troops and horse-drawn wagons as Napoleon's in 1812. They had a veneer of Panzer tanks and motorized infantry that could range far ahead until they ran into prepared positions, but most of the troops still walked for lack of trucks, and most of their supplies and artillery were still pulled by horses.)
But if Putin's army is truly having supply problems after only two days, that's total incompetence.
Mike needs a transcription of this video so he can learn from it.
I have no inside knowledge. I'm just putting the available data together and speculating about reasonable explanations.
That tank column has only moved a few miles in a few days. There's an explanation for that. One of the possibilities is that they're having problems fueling their vehicles. This is a common problem with armor divisions--going back to World War II. The logistics of keeping a huge armor division fueled and your supply lines open is typically a big problem. Meanwhile, I'm also reading reports that Russian soldiers are hungry and looking for food--also indicative of supply line problems.
And then I read reports like this about this video (which I've watched online):
"A Ukrainian man has filmed himself offering to tow an enemy tank back to Russia, after spotting the assault vehicle having apparently ground to a halt in the middle of a motorway.
"The latest in a series of viral clips of Ukrainians bravely confronting Russian troops shows the driver pulling up alongside the motionless military vehicle, and asking several soldiers from his open window whether they have broken down.
"Upon being told that they have run out of fuel, the driver prompts laughter from the soldiers as he asks: “Can I tow you back to Russia?”
"According to translations on social media, he then tells the soldiers they are en route to Kyiv after they fail to tell him where they are supposed to be going.
"Asked by the soldiers for news on the invasion, he tells them that Ukraine is winning the war while Moscow’s troops are good at surrendering because “they also do not know where they are going”. {Ken: LOL}
"As a parting shot, the Ukrainian claims to have asked “the whole column” of Russian vehicles advancing towards the capital but that “no one knows where they are and where they are going”. The footage shows him driving past yet another stationary tank within 30 seconds.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ukrainian-man-offers-tow-enemy-173243562.html
I also read that the amphibious troops that invaded from the coast asked the locals for directions.
We may be seeing life imitating Ayn Rand. Is it hard to believe that the Russian military's logistics are run by incompetent cronies who are really only there for the corruption?
Shouldn't that be expected?
The Grozny strategy, where you just send the incompetents in and blow the whole city to rubble may be the only strategy a incompetently run army can execute? Order them to just blow shit up? They can do that--if you can get them ammunition and fuel.
These are supposed to be the elite special forces going first, for reconnaissance and to take out key military targets. And they are getting obliterated.
I did watch Sevo's video and I don't dismiss it out of hand. There may be something to this. Let me be the first to admit that I'd be shocked if Russia's logistics were so bad they couldn't keep a small tank column moving for more than two days inside a tiny European country with modern highways.
If that's the case, then Komrade Kruschev needs to step into the General's office, slap a pistol down on the table and tell him that he'll have to either explain his failures to the boss or Option B: avoid the red tape altogether.
My general feeling is that Putin had no plans to "crush" the Ukraine militarily. I have suspected his goal was to move his military into Ukraine with a show of military force and through sheer intimidation cause some kind of brokered deal where Russia would get to annex some portion of Eastern Ukraine and it would all be over by Christmas.
This is just another piece of the puzzle, which may turn out to be false.
"The Russian advance on Kyiv has "stalled" amid food and fuel shortages, Ukrainian resistance and slower-than-expected troop movement toward the capital, a senior U.S. defense official told reporters on Tuesday. The Russians "are regrouping and trying to adjust to the challenges they have had," the official said.
----The Wall Street Journal, 36 minutes ago
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/russia-ukraine-latest-news-2022-03-01/card/russian-advance-on-kyiv-stalled-u-s-says-BBsVR5ATba81sDftETfj
I'm in general agreement, though I think he was really hoping for a quick capture of Kiev, the downfall of the current government, and a snap election to install a pliable dictator on the backs of repatriated eastern votes.
The ideal scenario here isn't Crimea or Chechnya, it's Belarus.
In regards to their strategy, I posted this in another thread:
"The initial assault resulted in considerable Russian casualties and demoralization in the Russian forces. It took another two months of heavy fighting, and a change in tactics, before the Russian Army was able to capture Grozny. The battle caused enormous destruction and casualties amongst the civilian population and saw the heaviest bombing campaign in Europe since the end of World War II.
----Battle of Grozny (1994–1995)
That what the Russians did in a similar situation, and that's what they seem to be doing now.
They turned Grozny to rubble, and that may be what they do to Kyiv. When the finesse game fails due to logistics, you send in the Hanson brothers and just tell them to blow shit up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUbn5ss8j9c
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1994%E2%80%931995)
Maybe he doesn't want to lose another 150 or so tanks. For decades Western Europe feared a Soviet armored invasion. Now the tanks are rolling deathtraps and hard for a Javelin to miss.
the column may be a rues and full of empty trucks to convince everyone things are going to get worse so surrender. it wouldn't be the first time such action was taken. the allies used blow up tanks during WWII to convince the Nazi's where we were going to go.
Can't play it safe though gotta treat it as the threat it is
I admit, I find it utterly baffling that they might legitimately not have brought enough logistical tail. Putin would have to have known this would not go over well on the international stage. There is no way they didn't plan this out well. Or somebody has fucked up really badly. Or hell, maybe some Ukrainian managed a really lucky shot on a supply depot somewhere?
And here's the editorial:
Peace for Ukraine will take sacrifices by Americans
Why does this particular geopolitical conflict keep causing our elite institutions to warn us that "this one's going to hurt". I don't recall that in previous foreign entanglements. Why, it's almost like the elite media sees this as an opportunity to gaslight us on the causes of our economic pain.
*waves watch in front of eyes*
That pain you're feeling? That pain you've been feeling for the last two years? That's because of the conflict in the Ukraine and the sanctions that we had to impose upon Russia.
Sanctions in Russia...
Yesss, sanctions in Russia. That's why you're unemployed!
Sanctions in Russia.
That's right, sanctions in Russia!
If that's the play, then wouldn't a Ukrainian victory be just as bad as a Russian one?
BP isn't actually selling anything, yet.
They've dropped a coue board seats from the Russian state oil company, that's it - so far.
This *is* something you'd in prep for selling - but it could just as easily be for headlines while they outwait the news cycle and then continue on as before.
Even if they bail out now they will probably buy back in the near future at even lower rates ending up with a bigger portion
There is no such thing as a vacuum bomb. This comes from a misunderstanding of how thermobaric weapons work.
And using them is not a war crime - or else the US was guilty of numerous war crimes for using them against Taliban cave complexes.
Yeah, same goes for cluster munitions. It's not the weapon that's the crime but what you use it against.
Vacuum bomb is a stupid term. All explosions create some overpressure, magnitudes of difference is somewhat hard to convey.
the US was guilty of numerous war crimes for using them against Taliban cave complexes.
Yup. Depending on the stupendously loose definition of vacuum bomb or thermobaric weapon, virtually every conflict for about the last 50 yrs. has been guilty on both sides. RPGs and concussion grenades (as distinct from flash bangs) constitute thermobaric explosives. The US certainly used the MOAB in Afghanistan and the distinction between a clusterbomb and a daisy cutter is a semantic in search of an argument to be made.
No they do not.
Thermobaric weapons are weapons where the fuel uses atmospheric oxygen - hence you get a much bigger bang for the amount of fuel your weapon is carrying.
Conventional explosive carry their oxidizer and are self-contained.
Not all RPGs and concussion grenades constitute them, but they do constitute them.
Another thermobaric weapon which is not a thermobaric or vacuum bomb:
https://twitter.com/fpleitgenCNN/status/1497519335350452231
Not enough wrinkles? How about Tomahawk missiles? Definitively not, right? The actual answer is "Well, it may depend on the range."
" Periodic reminder that nationalism is collectivist and gross"
Then why the opposition to the Russian invasion? If nations mean nothing, nationalism is gross, and borders are a violation of human rights then by your own standards this isn't an invasion of a sovereign nation but simply removing an unethical border whose existence violates human rights.
It's ok to us violence to do that, right?
" Periodic reminder that nationalism is collectivist and gross"
That statement alone is so profoundly ignorant I'm not even sure where to start with it. It's the kind of shit that gets uttered by a Jr. High kid who thinks xe's smarter than anyone else in the room.
It is the kind of utopian sentiment that gets libertarians dismissed as hopelessly unrealistic and unserious.
And profoundly ignorant of not only human nature but the very things that hold us together to actually keep us from constantly being at each other's throats.
"Oh, if only these social constructs would go away and we all just got together man in a huge international community without flags or borders or national politics, it would truly be The End of History, maaaan."
"... profoundly ignorant of not only human nature ..."
That's the fissure that reveals modern libertarianism for what it has always been - a stalking horse for the left.
We already had a well defined concept called liberty and it's avatar was classical liberalism. There was no need to invent something different.
Unless something different is what you really wanted.
We already had a well defined concept called liberty and it's avatar was classical liberalism. There was no need to invent something different.
Slight disagreement. Classical liberalism was co-opted by the same libertines and bleeding heart liberals. Agreed that libertarianism was no bulwark against further colonization.
"Oh, if only these social constructs would go away and we all just got together man in a huge international community without flags or borders or national politics, it would truly be The End of History, maaaan."
Unless pornographers and white supremacists (or far flung adjacents) turned up there, then we'd need the government to grant special protections.
Yeah, but Reason should be more thoughtful than that. Boehm is just an unserious child.
When you're a supposedly grown-assed adult and you're referring to geopolitical situations as 'gross' and not in a way that suggests size or scope but instead to relay "ickyness"... it's not a good look.
Especially considering that nationalism is what's motivating Ukrainians to fight back so hard to begin with.
This is just an infantile take that could only be birthed on Twitter.
If Bitcoin exchanges can stop specific people from using them, that puts paid to Reason's insistence that crypto is a way to escape state control through decentralized finance.
We're back to the exact same situation here except the building with your 'money' doesn't say 'bank' on it.
ONly the very question I've been asking for years here regarding bitcoin and crypto in general.
The exchanges don't own the bitcoin. This goes back to the Build Your Own X argument, but it's literally just that. Foreign banks can make Russian citizens' money disappear, bitcoin exchanges can only make them use a different ATM to withdraw it.
It doesn't change the fact that if bitcoin exchanges are to be successful and 'widely used' that major centralized corporations will naturally form which will handle large amounts of traffic for a global population.
Exchanges don't need to be successful and widely used, though. Bitcoin worked just fine before Coinbase and it will work long after they are gone.
I don't pretend to be an expert on Bitcoin, but if what you're saying is true, why do we need Coinbase? It sounds like Coinbase (or any exchange as a business model) is a terrible investment.
And by "investment" i mean "business model"
Coinbase is a way for mainstream investors to participate in Bitcoin price moves without being involved in the messy amateur hour Bitcoin economy, where whole exchanges get hacked and you're out of luck if you forget your password. It's more like a regular bank or brokerage account (but with much higher fees), with all the advantages and disadvantages that brings.
They do if you want to be able to use crypto with extremely long transaction times - especially if the crypto price is volatile - in order to conduct business on a personal scale.
KFC is not going to wait 2+ hours for your transaction to clear
This is all beginning to feel like that middling Ben Affleck movie where he's a gangster building a casino in the south during the 1930s. He goes into talk to one of the local power brokers who dismisses him and explains that there are more powerful people he's going to have to contend with. Affleck immediately shoots him in the head and says, "Then why the fuck am I talking to you?" (or some such similar collection of words and syllables.
Point being, if the exchanges are irrelevant to the bitcoin process, then why the fuck do we care if xxxxBase decides to stop doing business with ___________ because they're being Icky and Gross? Why are they even a business model if we don't need them?
Is it true that like 99% of bitcoins are held by 10% of bitcoin holders?
I've seen the figure thrown out there, but no idea if it's true.
The exchanges don't own the bitcoin.
They do, depending on the exchange, own the wallet.
bitcoin exchanges can only make them use a different ATM to withdraw it.
Or, by virtue of wallet ownership, make them use no ATM to withdraw it. Seriously, it's not like it's a hypothetical for an exchange to collapse or close down and the owners make off with some or all of the coins. This, or variations of it, have been implemented repeatedly since Mt. Gox, arguably the first BTC exchange, certainly a known flaw since the "Paleolithic Era" of crypto.
I've been pointing this out since the early days of crypto. If the Fed's control of printing presses and banks (distribution) makes that currency fiat, then the FCC's control of networks and bandwidth makes any currency reliant on network infrastructure the same. Even if they aren't explicitly meddling in it via that end.
Yes, Boehm, foreign policy is icky and unpleasant. It is not necessarily "nationalism" except where practiced by nation states. It is also something that is unavoidable. It has been going on since the Egyptians and the Hittites clashed. Your disgust at it is not going change it. A state is collective organization, but you need such an organization to protect your rights and liberties, and your state must needs deal with other states. It can be ugly, but you do not have the option for the type of purity that will make you happy.
But we could achieve The End of History if we become the internationalist globalist village!
Singing Lennon's "Imagine"...oh, wait, that is a terrible song.
More like Lenin's "Imagine".
Days since enbs last yglasias reffrence :12
>>Remote work is proving to be more persistent than expected.
the office is a dinosaur I'm enjoying its quickened death. fluorescent lamps are Satan's opiate.
Basement Bunker Biden doesn't need congress to "send him legislation that lowers costs of everyday expenses working families face", he caused it by executive order, he can reverse it in 30 minutes all by himself.
Restore oil leases, authorize an AMERICAN pipeline.
Science.
The science is settled. Pipelines cause climate change.
Higher fuel costs are the cost of defending the planet. Sure, lots of people will suffer and some may die, but that's a sacrifice Grandpa Joe is willing to make to defend the planet.
If he is so sure he is right, why does he stick up a fence every time someone says something mean in Twitter?
"Mr. Biden, tear down this wall!"
https://twitter.com/CityBureaucrat/status/1498502612982845445?t=TIFo4XNKBPuNfHEJId7Wvg&s=19
The warm desert of the Ukraine winter
[Video]
"President Biden will call on Congress to send him legislation that lowers costs of everyday expenses working families face and lowers the deficit by rewarding work, not wealth,"
I gave up spittin' tobaccy recently, so I'm not directly affected by the transitory supply chain induced inflation, but this sounds an awful low like price controls and tax hikes, rather than a promise to cut spending and stop making the national debt problem even worse.
https://twitter.com/JesseKellyShow/status/1498460355755790337?t=pGqjKfn3IXJk3wn71HaYMw&s=19
We’re so screwed.
[Link]
America voted for nicer tweets. And they got it, good and hard.
Some of us voted for a good economy, fewer federal regulations, and more freedom.
We got Biden instead.
https://twitter.com/SohrabAhmari/status/1498479885861507077?t=xdelxoj5Jv6H94DsW0C4jQ&s=19
As you grapple with the media barrage on Ukraine, here are some info traps to watch out for:
Beware emotionally charged images that overwhelm reason.
Beware the treatment of dissent as treason.
Beware delusions of our total mastery over complex crises.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/SouthAsiaIndex/status/1498607419387445249?t=CqwBImEVdnVlHr1rphU-Tg&s=19
Just In: Russia to invite Pakistan, China, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, India, Ethiopia & other countries in "Anti Fascist Conference."
■ Grand Conference aims at combating fascism, to be held in Moscow in coming months.
I noticed that India didn't vote against Russia at the UN either.
https://twitter.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1498587916360163328?t=zQtK5WH22FEDmdvPQqV2iw&s=19
US calls for Russian athletes to be thrown out of Winter Paralympics in Beijing
You read that right
https://twitter.com/Brick_Suit/status/1498452421512626176?t=5J7bLZXL5oAt55l-fdpw8g&s=19
UKRAINE MEME THREAD...
Drop what you got here. Any meme you've got that relates to Russia vs. Ukraine regardless of who it favors.
War memes are hell!
https://twitter.com/NoahCarl90/status/1498599452101287943?t=I73ndf2DihT_7EMDjQ817A&s=19
Why hasn't Saudi Arabia been sanctioned for its bombing campaign in Yemen? According to Wikipedia, more than 12,000 civilians have been killed to date.
I just watched Boris Johnson respond to a question about establishing a no-fly zone over Ukraine with an answer about how 1) that would entail direct conflict between NATO and Russia and 2) A no-fly zone isn't seriously being considered by any NATO member.
Good answer!
If I were in charge of a 40-mile military column advancing toward an enemy city...
And it was brought to my attention that aerial overhead pictures of my assets and movements were being circulated all over the world in near-real time...
I might get a little concerned about my air cover.
Fuck Russia, fuck Putin, fuck every single Russian oligarch and every single member of Russian government who enabled this lunatic.
The Russian people are being fed a shit sandwich (meet the new boss, same as the old boss), and 145 million people who surely just wanted to get on with their lives are going to suffer terribly. If I was one of them, I might just get a little upset.
And it was brought to my attention that aerial overhead pictures of my assets and movements were being circulated all over the world in near-real time...
There's something to be said about a crushing military invasion where local Tik Toker's are able to still send cute videos with sparkly backgrounds.
I don't know exactly what is to be said, but there is definitely SOMETHING to be said.
Let me know when "WarTok" looks a little more like this.
TikTok’s mind-reading algorithm nearly predicts what you want to watch before you watch it.
One of the no-kidding freakiest social media incidents I had was back when I was still on Facebook. I developed a sudden craving for Triscuit crackers while internet browsing, and then when I opened up Facebook a few seconds later, saw an ad for Triscuit crackers.
I hadn't searched for Triscuit crackers in Google, I hadn't said a word out loud, just thought internally, "Gee, a few Triscuits for a snack sounds pretty good right now!"
I'm sure it was a coincidence, but at the time it was pretty creepy and was one of the reasons I finally deleted my account there a few months later.
On the "news"
"US officials say there's no sign Russia has achieved air superiority yet."
15 seconds later...
"Here's a 40 mile long convoy of Russian equipment on the road to Keev"
Kiev --> Kyiv --> ??
Hey, media, what's the capitol of Russia?
Moscow.
Bzzzt. Wrong.
Hey media, what's the capitol of the Czech Republic.
Prague.
Bzzzt. Wrong.
Hey media, what the capitol of ___________?
Incidentally, Austria is spelled "Österreich", and Vienna, is spelled "Wien", and Munich is spelled "München".
The English names for these places were determined hundreds of years ago, and there's no good reason to change them. When Mexicans are talking about New York in Spanish, they talk about "Nueva York", and it would asinine to insist they use English names for places when they're speaking Spanish.
Incidentally, if you want to have fun with progressive Mexicans, who insist on referring to San Diego as "Santiago", when you hear them say it, inform them that San Diego wasn't named for St. James. They think we're ignorant. Say, "Don't you know anything about Spanish colonial history?!"
Who refers to San Diego as Santiago? I've literally never heard that.
San Diego was named after San Diego De Alcala -- the catholic Saint Didacus. Spanish name of a Spanish saint applied to the area by a Spaniard. In Spanish.
On the other hand, to be sure, Russia may not have air superiority over Ukraine, and still be able to defend a convoy outside Ukraine.
I'm amazed that Ukraine hasn't sent aircraft over that column to shoot it up, do they not have that capability, did Obama make them give up war planes?
Their airfields were bombed to shit and their Jets shot down.
"World War 3 is Really Stressing Me Out," Woman tells Girlfriends over brunch.
"WASHINGTON — Plagued by poor morale as well as fuel and food shortages, some Russian troops in Ukraine have surrendered en masse or sabotaged their own vehicles to avoid fighting, a senior Pentagon official said on Tuesday.
"Some entire Russian units have laid down their arms without a fight after confronting surprisingly stiff Ukrainian defense, the official said. A significant number of the Russian troops are young conscripts who are poorly trained and ill-prepared for the all-out assault. And in some cases, Russian troops have deliberately punched holes in their vehicles’ gas tanks, presumably to avoid combat, the official said."
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/03/01/world/ukraine-russia-war#some-russian-troops-are-surrendering-or-sabotaging-vehicles-rather-than-fight-a-pentagon-official-says
I wonder what they're doing with the POWs. I wonder if they still want to go back to Russia. They'd probably face a court martial and maybe shot for desertion. I'd love to see some interviews with captured POWs, although it may be against international law to use them for propaganda purposes that way.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to parse what's real from what's overhype by the media.
Here's Kim Iversen (feat. Reason's own Robert Soave) on how much fake video, and in some circumstances literal video game footage is being used by outlets to describe a violent situation on the ground.
I'm really too lazy (and too busy with RL) to post it, but I had a long post prepared about how this is the ONE area where our [much hated-- and with good reason] corporate news is supposed to shine, and they're failing miserably. The advantage of corporate news is they ostensibly have bureaus in all the world's largest cities who can then dispatch correspondents on the ground so we can get a birds-eye view of what's going on. This is the one area where we should be getting either live or nearly live footage of actions on the ground, instead they're using file-footage from chemical explosions in China, old photos of other conflicts from 2015, stock photos from 2019 and in the most egregious of cases, fucking video game footage as what I can best guess is 'placeholder' video which is to help the viewer 'visualize' what it might be like if 'x conflict expands considerably'.
This is one area where it's extremely important to not go into full-conspiracy theory mode, but our corporate media is failing us so spectacularly, it beggars belief as to what the real situation is on the ground.
They shine in one area and one area only: selling ads.
Well, like I said above, the best we can do is look at multiple sources to explain the facts we can verify.
The fact is that there is a huge column of armor that didn't move for days.
How to explain it is the question.
I saw video of a guy rolling up to a tank, and the tanks explaining that the reason they weren't moving was because they were out of gas. He then rolled by another tank that wasn't moving.
That's a fact that doesn't depend on any news agency.
I'm hearing from the Pentagon, that the Russians are having problems because they're short on fuel.
Maybe they're lying! They lied about mobile WMD labs in Iraq, too. I'm not saying it's a convincing fact, but it's another piece of evidence that the armor is having trouble with fuel--coming from a different source.
Because it isn't conclusive evidence, doesn't mean it isn't evidence.
Another fact is that keeping armor fueled in hostile territory has historically been a logistical problem with armored vehicles since World War II. Even the generals of the ancient world were worried about maintaining their supply lines in hostile territory.
It also accounts for the fact that time is of the essence for Putin. He wants this to end quickly, so it's unlikely that he'd tell his armor to take their time until they're ready.
We shouldn't stop considering other explanations, but I'm willing to go so far as to say this is the most likely explanation. The explanation that seems to be most consistent with the facts that aren't relying on someone's interpretation appears to be that the Russians are having trouble keeping their tanks fueled.
If the Pentagon came out and said that wasn't the explanation at this point, I might have cause to be skeptical because it doesn't jibe with the other facts.
That doesn't mean this is the truth, but it may reasonably be the best interpretation we have given the information we have available. That's how science works, too. We can only form hypotheses based on the information we have available, and when new facts come in that conflict with that hypothesis, we'll need to adjust or reject the current consensus.
The problem is: We don't have enough information to formulate a good hypothesis. Few really know WTF is going on in Ukraine, and those who do know are not sharing their information.
I know this: I do not believe a damned thing the MSM reports
And this: I do not believe a damned thing politicians say
And this: Ukraine is not America's fight
Keep a very healthy and active skepticism.
We do have enough information to form a hypothesis. Because we don't know the absolute truth doesn't mean we can't make rational conclusions from the available data. Science work the same way. If new data becomes available tomorrow showing that the sun really does orbit the earth, then we'll need to thrown heliocentric theory out the window. Until then, the available evidence seems to suggest that the Russians are having a hard time keeping their tanks full of fuel.
"Originally, fallibilism is the philosophical principle that propositions concerning empirical knowledge can be accepted even though they cannot be proven with certainty, or in short, that no beliefs are certain . . . . Nowadays, theorists may also refer to fallibilism as the notion that empirical knowledge might turn out to be false."
----Fallibilism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism
One of the important implications is that the things that are most likely to be true are the things that survive the most scrutiny. The theory that the Russians are having a hard time fueling their armor has survived a lot of scrutiny so far. In science, it's the idea that because of the fundamental problem of science, you can never be sure of what new information will become available in the future, and that means your hypotheses are never set in stone. If new data comes in tomorrow that disproves your current hypothesis, you need to abandon it.
We can form rational hypotheses despite the uncertainty, but the science is never settled. In fact, uncertainty is always a problem. Some things have a much lower degree of uncertainty (heliocentric theory) and some a much higher degree of uncertainty (why the tanks aren't moving), but because a hypothesis is uncertain is no reason not to hold it to be true pending further evidence to the contrary. Given the available information, all I'm saying is that the explanation that is consistent with the evidence so far appears to be the one about the Russians having problems keeping their armor fueled--not that this is the absolute truth.
The invasion is going so poorly for Russia that Ukrainians are desperately begging for the world to come save them or millions will die...
I wonder if Putin will re-implement the WW2 tactic of shooting deserters on the spot. A few loyal guys at the back with rifles keeps everyone moving forward, at least in theory.
Who is Herschel Feivel Grynszpan?
Thread
https://twitter.com/MorlockP/status/1498653353886289923?t=adwLkJ5-7BvHfFIH5r2e0w&s=19
1/
I am very much against the Russian invasion of the Ukraine.
I am also horrified by the unanimity in opposition to it.
I've been getting more and more upset about very quick preference cascades, whether they're for things I like, or for things I dislike.
>>>
2/
Fast cascades do not indicate to me that people are grappling with issues and slowly reaching consensus - they indicate a purely social, not intellectual, process where people are snapping-to-grid.
Conformity propagates outwards through the game-of-life grid.
Zombies.
3/
I am also very much against the SWIFT delisting of Russia, and the seizure of foreign exchange reserves.
Why?
Kegan 4 level thinking.
(a) I want PROCESS with rules, deliberation, and appeals, not mob rule
(b) I prefer a diversity of geopolitical regimes over a monoculture
4/
(c) incentives and second order effects. After this is over, what do Russia, China, Iran, etc. do? Stay on SWIFT? Or make some competitor? Does the dollar stay the world reserve currency?
5/
(d) You get to use a doomsday weapon against a zero-day vulnerability just once, and then it gets patched.
[ overlaps w previous point 'c' ]
...so is THIS the event that we want to blow the SWIFT weapon on ?
6/
Finally, I hate the baby steps that the entire West is making towards social credit scores.
Moldbug, in his leaving-Tlon essay talked about how property is inviolable and does not depend on the merit of the holder - because if it can be redistributed based on merit >>>
7/
...then it's not property.
...and as we have seen in the PRC w social credit scores, in Canada w the freezing of accounts that [ legally ] donated to a [ legal ] protest group, and now at the international level, the Cathedral HATES property-qua-property BECAUSE veto-proof.
10/
...Bill Clinton's reaction to the 1995 Quebec referendum, where he weighed in and said that if Quebec voted for secession, the resulting state would not be party to NAFTA.
11/
It was very clearly an attempt to interfere with foreign politics (someone alert Hillary Clinton; I know she HATES this sort of thing) and at the time I was mystified ... WHY did Bill care if there was 1 Canada or 2 Canadas?
I had already been a libertarian for years but
12/
...I grew even more cynical at that moment (which is saying something - this is just after I'd watched Bill Clinton and Janet Reno burn women and children to death at Waco live on TV bc they'd embarrassed the BATF's "Operation Showtime" designed to justify higher budgets).
13/
So anyway, I realized then that the elite class (a) have sort of a teleological world view where civilization means that everything becomes more and more centralized, and local independence / freedom upsets this vision of the anointed (b) they share class interest >
14/
and it was likely physically painful for Bill Clinton to contemplate a member of his fellow elite having half of his serfs stripped away from him.
15/
How I want Canada to deal with malcontents: hold elections; see who wants to stay and who wants to leave.
How I want Ukraine to deal with malcontents: hold elections; see who wants to stay and who wants to leave.
>>>
16/
How I want the US to deal with malcontents: hold elections; see who wants to stay and who wants to leave.
17/
"@hippokleides
In a few short days, we've moved from pundits mournfully intoning platitudes about the terrible return of war to Europe (completely ignoring the 90s, of course) to shrieking for a great power war and explaining nukes aren't that big a deal anyway.
This is political psychosis."
[Links]
18/
"by right of conquest" is descriptive, not prescriptive ; it explains what HAS happened and not (a) what should happen; (b) the various things that might happen
Is/ought
"“By right of conquest” is a thing.
A bad thing, but still a thing."
Regardless of whether Putin takes none, some, or all of Ukraine, his failure to secure a quick win has “accidentally revitalized the West’s liberal order.”
That would be more meaningful if the West’s leadership weren’t almost entirely useless, stupid, corrupt, or all three — but leaders can be replaced. - Stephen Greene
Accidentally my eye. This is exactly what the Western leaders wanted a war for.
On February 17, one U.S. dollar would buy you about 75 rubles.
Right now, one U.S. dollar will buy you about 117 rubles.
https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=USD&to=RUB
Am I not reading this right?
117 - 75 = 42
42/75 = .56
That's a 56% drop in the value of a ruble!
Don't let anybody tell you we aren't doing anything for the Ukrainians.
Maybe that's 42/117 for a 36% drop.
Anyway, . . .
Upside down; use dollars per ruble:
1/75 = 0.013333 USD/RUB on 17 Feb
1/117 = 0.008547 USD/RUB on 1 Mar
(0.008547 - 0.013333) / 0.013333 = -0.35897
or 36% decline
Yeah, that's what I realized.
So, anyway, We've cut the value of the ruble by 36%.
Don't let anyone tell you we aren't doing anything for the Ukrainians.
Did that make life harder for the average 'Ivan on the street'? I tend to doubt it, Ken. It has been six days since Russia invaded.
Ukraine needs ammo, bro....Where and when is Europe providing it?
That's already arrived. It came on the ground from Poland.
The average Ivan in the street is pulling so much money out of their banks, that the central bank had to raise interest rates to 20% to entice them to stay put. The reason the Central Bank raised the interest rate to 20% was because they had to--or make the banks fail for a lack of deposits because the average Ivan on the street is taking his money out. They didn't want to do that.
The currency has lost 36% of its value in the international market, and that won't promote more exports under these circumstances. Inflation is going up, and their stock market will fall dramatically when it opens judging by the indexes trading in the U.S.--as I linked below. Always trust the market data to tell the real story instead of the news, and the market data is telling us that over the next one to two quarters, the Russian economy will be under tremendous pressure. If GDP dropped by 5% in the U.S., we'd have riots like we had in the summer of 2020.
Yeah, I think the average Russian will feel it. But I think the Russian oligarchs will feel it the most. Their assets are being
frozen[seized] left and right. The owner of Chelsea FC stepped away from the club for fear that the British government would seize it. They're taking everything that isn't in Russia. It's open season. These governments will be seizing all the money they can find and taking it for a 100% discount. I think the coup is more likely than the revolution, and Putin has cost the oligarchs hundreds of billions of dollars at this point.Math is racist
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1498686072661975040?t=BkGl_r6PaxNEVEAD83As7w&s=19
Zelensky seems to have two options: negotiate terms with Russia or see his already poor country absolutely decimated by war.
No one is coming to save Ukraine.
Western leaders have made it clear that option B is their preferred choice.
Make a deal & live to fight another day.
It's easy for us to continue to tell Kiev to fight to the very last man. It's much more humble and realistic to observe the actual situation on the ground. This is a chess match that Ukraine is losing, and it's better to take an unsavory deal & regroup than to lose everything.
Delusional is believing that Ukraine will defeat a military that has already surrounded them, with assets deployed directly in front of them, as Ukraine begs the West for help that is not coming.
They're giving Ukraine false hope, which is not helpful to Ukraine, but it serves powerful interests in the western world, so they continue to entertain the delusions.
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1498719500799295493?t=UmZsRyTgxyxDekHHVZ7_9Q&s=19
You have to wonder if Zelensky's hands are tied by more powerful interests. Very possible that negotiating a deal with Russia is not allowed.
Which leader did Ukraine buy? That is the question MSM is pointedly not asking.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1498697404501180418?t=XZXq8bzzP5P4uKTQS3Qv9w&s=19
What an odd little map the NYT has created. Ukrainians fleeing violence by heading to the west are "refugees," while Ukrainians fleeing violence by heading east to seek refuge in Russia are just "migrants" (and are graphically minimized to the point of being barely visible).
[Graphic]
https://twitter.com/TheDigitalBers1/status/1498696655004049409?t=w5EHgmd6umGvJwKF_yWv3Q&s=19
Pfizer vaccine data. Of particular interest is page 30.
You’re welcome.
[Link]
https://twitter.com/TheMarcitect/status/1498668458766131201?t=DfEG3xrMtovWaybjuzcL7Q&s=19
It looks like we are going to have to go through whatever they have planned before we can get out. They aren't stopping for anything. There are to many people that have bought into it.
https://twitter.com/rcbregman/status/1498673316315467795?t=a9kClOcUrpDpPrVj_raRdw&s=19
Short ???? on my feelings of deep unease about the current atmosphere, and the dizzying speed with which radical conclusions are being drawn. People who couldn’t find Ukraine on a map a week ago, are calling for a no fly-zone. 1/9
People who had never heard of SWIFT a week ago, now want even more banks to be kicked off it. People who don't really know what the current sanctions are, and what their effects will be, are calling for more sanctions. More, more, more. 2/9
People who've been never been excited about military spending, and have always scoffed at the crazy amounts of money the US spends on its army, are now very excited about the German promise to spend an extra $100 billion. 3/9
People who used to be almost pacifists now want to supply more weapons to Ukraine. Javelins! Stingers! Fighter jets! Don't hesitate, don't delay, it's now or never! It's the whole world against Russia! 4/9
People who have no clue about the European energy system (and just how dependent we are on natural gas) are shouting that we should just boycot all Russian gas, 'double down on renewables', without any idea of the radical consequences. 5/9
So many pundits seem exhilarated by this moment, and how it proves everything they've been saying for years ('now more than ever!') – without worrying about how our actions could be counter-productive and contribute to an escalatory spiral. 6/9
In the words of Dutch historian Jolle Demmers: 'It is precisely the decline and contraction of Russian power, coupled with the possession of nuclear weapons and a tormented repressive president, that poses great risks.' [Link]
Or like @robertwiblin said: 'If what you do gets three billion people killed it doesn't matter that the cause you were fighting for was just.'
It almost seems as if we've forgotten nuclear weapons still exist. Even a small chance of nuclear conflict is completely terrifying. 8/9
After the election of Trump, @mashagessen counseled us to 'Believe the autocrat' ([link]). I think that's especially important when the autocrat is threatening to use his nuclear weapons. 9/9
Progressives don't mind mass murder, war, or genocide if it is for a cause they believe in. It's always the same.
Sting is going to be on tour this year. I wonder if he's still doing that song about how the Russians love their children too, or if everybody is just pretending he never sang it.
Or if The Rolling Stones still sing "My Sweet Neocon".
Yeah, that song didn't age well.
"Play 'Back In The USSR'!"
please, no.
Fine.
"Play 'From Russia With Love'!"
"I'd ask for directions, look for landmarks, fold maps, carry a guidebook, and keep an atlas in the glove compartment. I never knew when the next train was coming. I waited around a lot.
I memorized phone numbers, jotted things down in notebooks, had conversations with taxi drivers, talked to random people at bars, wrote checks, went to the bank, and daydreamed. I was grossly inefficient and terribly bored. I rarely got what I wanted and, when I did, I had to wait at least 8-10 days for it to be delivered. I was not archived, nor was I searchable; things I said just disappeared forever."
You mean, you used to interact with actual humans, in real time in the real world, instead of putting your nose in a screen?
Is this supposed to be an awful list, or a great list? Most seem pretty great to me.
In other market news, because the Russian markets are closed for trading, we don't get any headlines about them falling. Judging by the Russian index funds that are trading in the U.S., it's gonna be a bloodbath.
ERUS was at $29.83 on February 23. It's now at $12.50.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ERUS?
The stock market ceased to be a meaningful indicator of the economy many, many decades ago.
US stock markets should probably also fall by 70-80% to get anywhere near the actual value of those assets.
Ever heard of "Liberty Cabbage"? This isn't new.
Freedom fries!
More fuel-air explosives, for peaceful purposes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X2RkSGMa6Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBOCdEtOGCI for a barrage of them. We call them in fireworks lampares. A low explosive flash charge spreads and ignites a liquid or powdered fuel that mixes with the air. Bright flash, usually an infrared pulse you can feel, big honkin' kaboom and shock wave, and usually black smoke.
"I'd ask for directions,... had conversations with taxi drivers, talked to random people at bars..."
OMG! He actually talked directly to other humans! Odd he complains about being social in person when "social media" is all the rage albeit not actually social, especially twitter which is more a bitch-fest, accusatory, cluster-fuck.
"I was not archived, nor was I searchable; things I said just disappeared forever."
Sometimes that's a better option as it likely may be in this case. I guess it's all about getting likes from people who have no lives that you don't give a shit about than actually saying anything that has actual meaning.
Oh, no doubt if he loses his phone he'll likely revert to being as precocious as a newborn marsupial unable to find his way out of the pouch.
I suspect what companies are really saying is "we're afraid that if we deal with Russia, regulators are going to come down like a ton of bricks on us".
It may seem appealing in the short term that institutions can beat Russia into the ground, but the same techniques can be used to beat down anybody or anything who dares to challenge Western elites. And let's be clear here: it is Western elites who are ultimately responsible for this war; Putin is a ruthless dictator, but he is predictable and he simply did what he said what he was going to do. It was arrogant and incompetent people like Stoltenberg who caused this.
Hopefully, the lesson from this won't be that countries and institutions cower in fear before the might of SWIFT and Maersk, but rather that countries around the world create many different alternatives so that people and countries can't simply be deplatformed, memory holed, or wiped from existence at the push of a button.
We yawn at Dems and Gee-Oh-Pee attacking each other, just not with tanks. But this is too much like Germany's Adolf Putin invading Czechoslovakia 83 years ago. Where are the intelligent Russian military men to shoot or blow up the KGB madman? German military personnel at least tried to decapitate National Socialism. It was the least they could do after letting the berserker run amok in the first place!
The groundwork for this was carefully established during the Trump administration.
Before he even announced his candidacy. "Fuck the EU." - Nuland-Pyatt
Duh! We all know that strawmen fear when GG's handing out bullshit.
Fuck off.
Ordering your gunmen to attack and kill people and destroy things is pretty much the definition of evil. It's not necessarily a sign of insanity.
I'm not sure which is worse, the Biden Admin and Europe not knowing that pushing NATO membership for Ukraine would be considered a provocation by Russia, or knowing that it would and hoping Putin would respond as he has, so they could cut off Russia economically and try to encourage the Russian people to overthrow Putin, at the cost of the safety of the Ukrainian people.
Asshole now tries more bullshit.
Fuck off.
And the funny part is people are walking around going "Putin is crazy because the thinks the CIA has 500,000 agents fomenting dissent in the Ukraine." much the same way it was said Trump was crazy for thinking the FBI was wiretapping him. Not to defend Putin too vociferously but there's paranoia, there's people out to get you, then there are Americans repeatedly impeaching their own President because they think you're out to get them.
It's quite stunning.
I mean, just look at some of the posts in this thread.
Relaying msm US intel "assessments" of the way the war is going, and taking it as the 100% accurate truth... as if those exact same sources haven't spent the last 5 years lying big about pretty much everything.
It's weird.
Stop fighting you two.
^This.
Sevo, Nardz and Geiger, save your ire for the liars and trolls. Debate each other properly because I know you both reached your differing positions honestly.
You're not like Shrike posting Soros.org talking points, or sarcasmic regurgitating shit he heard on CNN.
I think this may be more complicated than you realize, and I think I'm with Sevo on this one.
I realize how complicated it is, but I also think those guys are all basically decent people and I hope that they remember that.
Allied with Italy's economy against the strongest economies on the world. Allied with a monster who is turning every decent against his position. Good. I hope all the rats of this would jump on that sinking ship.