Young Americans More Supportive of Cancel Culture, Also More Afraid of It
A plurality of young people think their fear of losing job opportunities is a price worth paying to remedy past injustices.

Young people are much more fearful of cancel culture than older Americans, but they are also more supportive of it, according to a new report by the Manhattan Institute's Eric Kaufmann that surveys public attitudes toward various culture war items like critical race theory, free speech on college campuses, and diversity training.
When analyzing polling data from a variety of surveys, Kaufmann found that 45 percent of working people under the age of 30 were afraid of losing their jobs because "someone misunderstands something you have said or done, takes it out of context, or posts something from your past online"—i.e., the kind of social sanction typically described as cancel culture. Among Americans 55 and older, just 29 percent had this same fear.
But if younger millennials and members of Gen Z have more to fear from cancel culture, they are also much more willing to say that they accept these terms.
"By a 48–27 margin, respondents under 30 agree that 'My fear of losing my job or reputation due to something I said or posted online is a justified price to pay to protect historically disadvantaged groups,'" notes Kaufmann. "Those over 50, by contrast, disagree by a 51–17 margin. Younger age brackets are both more fearful of cancel culture and more supportive of it than are older age groups."
Kaufmann pushes back against the idea that there's a hypocrisy here: On the contrary, it seems that many young people are taking a self-sacrificial attitude.
"Rather than viewing such individuals as thin-skinned or inconsistent, we should consider them to be adhering to a consistent set of ideas that places the emotional safety and advancement of minority groups above their personal freedom of expression," he writes. "An individual aged 18–25 who fears cancellation has a nearly 60% chance of agreeing that this is a justifiable price to pay to protect minorities, compared with only 10% of the oldest survey respondents who fear being canceled."
That's just one finding of the report, which describes young people's affinity for what it calls cultural socialism, a worldview that "values equal results and harm prevention for identity groups over individual rights" and "has inspired race-based pedagogies and harsh punishments for controversial speech." Kaufmann contrasts this with cultural liberalism, the presumption in favor of free speech, individuality, and due process that compromises the older, default way of thinking about social issues.
These categorizations are somewhat crude, and it's hard to say what's specifically socialist about the newer attitudes. (Thinking that the government ought to prevent private employers from disciplining employees over a misunderstanding or prior social media post could be described as the more socialist stance.) Nevertheless, the survey results are fairly interesting, and the responses to this question and many others all point in the same direction: Young people are far more supportive of cancel culture.
And while ideology remains the very best predictor of support for cancel culture—with progressives supporting it and conservatives opposing it—age was a remarkably useful proxy: Cancel culture drew some support from young Republicans, for instance.
"Younger respondents are significantly more politically biased, even controlling for party identification, race, and gender," writes Kaufmann. "Some 55 percent of [Joe] Biden voters 25 and under would not hire a [Donald] Trump supporter for a job, dropping to 39 percent for the 26–49 group and 29 percent for those over 50. Only 23 percent of young Biden supporters said that they would be comfortable having lunch with a Trump supporter, compared with 42 percent of Biden voters over 25."

Kaufmann's report does not paint a pretty picture of the future for libertarians. Younger Americans are both more supportive of cancel culture and more interested in using the power of the state to right perceived wrongs. While older Republicans have more of a libertarian streak, and are less willing to consider government action as the right solution, younger Republicans have few such hangups, "indicating a possible generational shift within the GOP base toward a more interventionist and less libertarian form of conservatism."
For those of us who oppose the excesses of cancel culture but do not think that giving the government more authority to set the rules is the right approach, much convincing remains to be done.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh what 20 years of a full court press indoctrination will get you. I hope all of their teachers get killed in school shootings
But trying to stop the indoctrination...THAT is suppressing "Free speech".
Kind of like how Robby was in favor of governors and the president forcing mandates on businesses was libertarian, but a governor telling a business they couldn’t force mandates on its workers was anti-libertarian.
Robby is a scumbag.
And also in favor of businesses putting health mandates on their employees because "they're private companies".
Afraid of the thing they built.
I would be interested to see if opinions change when they find themselves canceled for something stupif they said when they were 12.
People support these things because it's always somebody else who's getting canceled. They never think they will end up on the recieving end of it as long as they tie the line. What they don't realize is, the line just keeps moving and there's no way to know if you're going to be on the right side of it.
I would be interested to see if opinions change when they find themselves canceled for something stupif they said when they were 12.
Maybe they will, but I doubt it. I don't think most people really appreciate the depth to which these generations have been pathologized over the last 25 years, especially as critical pedagogies became the standard in teacher training programs, in conjunction with race/gender marxism becoming the philosophical keystone of academia.
It would essentially take a liquidation of the entire university system to reverse what's happened in that time.
We need to stop all federal funding funnels including loans, so the beast isn't as well fed. Government backed money will ruin anything.
I doubt it too, but perspectives do change when you have kids to support and a mortgage to pay. It's also a little hard to see the righteousness of a mugging when you're the one being mugged.
That won't happen, because the only stupid things they say when they are twelve are the "correct" stupid things they were taught were the truth.
That's the point. The "correct" thing is constantly changing. The rules are in flux all the time, and you never know when the "correct" thing will become incorrect.
That's the problem with socialist revolutions- they're never over. Socialism and the totalitarianism it brings, both live and breath on envy and hate. There always has to be a new enemy to purge, and any day, that enemy could be you, even of you've said and done all the "correct" things.
They're just too stupid to realize that.
Truth! Two phrases used commonly used when my oldest daughter was a teenager were, "that's so gay", and X is "da bomb". The first would put a hex on you now and the second would get you detained as a potential insurrectionist.
What was correct when they were 12 will become a capital offense when they are 25.
"I would be interested to see if opinions change when they find themselves canceled for something stupif they said when they were 12."
Depending on the political leanings of the person in question, it would excused away as "I've grown as a person" and then they will move on.
Sort of, to the extent that they've institutionalized their pathologies and free-floating anxiety in a way that sets the stage for institutional authoritarianism when they take over
This is basically a real-life version of the Twilight Zone episode "It's a Good Life," where a town is terrorized by a kid with supernatural powers into indulging whatever arbitrary desire pops in to his head. Millennials and especially Zoomers, tellingly, have record levels of mental illness (both diagnosed and encouraged, such as troonery), and are basically forcing society to cater to their childish whims in the interest of protecting them from the harsh realities of ordinary life.
Or, more to the point:
"Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party. On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it… All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children.”
Remember that quote in particular when school boards, administrators, and teachers whine about you pushing back against their deliberate attempts to come between you and your kids.
What I cannot get over Red is that these children voluntarily choose this cancel culture horseshit, yet live in terror of it.
Like I said, the schools have pathologized their normal hormonal growth and general anxieties into treating self-loathing, primarily in white kids, as a virtue. They choose it because they think they deserve it for the original sin of their skin color.
Yeah.
Young people are much more fearful of cancel culture than older Americans, but they are also more supportive of it, according to a new report by the Manhattan Institute's Eric Kaufmann that surveys public attitudes toward various culture war items like critical race theory, free speech on college campuses, and diversity training.
Oh, well, then stop.
That perfectly describes the evolution of society in N Korea. With few exceptions, there is no desire to rebel. The only question is whether that is strictly a societal evolution or if through killing off the rebels, they've actually evolved a biological hybrid where what we think of as human nature has yielded to subservience.
It's also at least partially reminiscent of Germans in the early 1940s and those with Hitler youth.
Turns out that giving teenagers smart phones and social media was just as destructive as giving them whisky and guns.
I would say more so.
Good. I hope the little Maoists are scared shitless! Maybe they'll be so afraid of cancellation by their own cancel culture that no cancellation gets done! It's like Jiu-Jitsu, taking the overwhelming force of your aggressor and using it against the aggressor! Brilliant!
Interesting research. It's disheartening to see how much the culture, especially in younger generations, has moved away from the values of free speech and pursuit of truth.
It's just astonishing, honestly.
You will find the same proportions in the old farts that were taught to think, and the mindless young who were taught what to think.
Koch / Reason libertarianism's decision to explicitly align itself with progressivism looks smarter every day.
#LibertariansForCancelCulture
What kind of life are these kids living? Fear of being cancelled, but completely accepting of being cancelled in order to right previous wrongs and be a good citizen.
We are becoming such a pathetic nation.
No, they are like all kids, whether facing war or dangerous jobs. They think they are immune to reality, that it will always happen to somebody else, never them.
More likely the younguns' "acceptance", their "self-sacrificial attitude", means they are like all younguns and think they can't get hurt by reality.
And when they do get hurt by it and change their mind, it will be interpreted as "they got more conservative" when in reality, they simply got mugged by themselves and learned they are not immortal.
I'm not convinced it's a self-sacrificial attitude. I think it's a sense that one is "on the right side of history" on every topic.
Douglas Murray talks about this attitude and how ridiculous it is. He points out how there's this idea that we're the first generation in human history that isn't doing anything wrong, we've solved and answered all the great social and moral questions, and 100, 200, 300 years hence, everything we're doing will be judged as rational, correct, and our statues will still be standing.
I don;t think this generation is the first with that attitude. I think it's the same as younguns feeling immortal, immune to the reality which affects older generations, that their immunity and immortality prove that they are the new gods.
I read a book on Kaiser Wilhelm II, which described him not as believing he was a god, as earlier monarchs had, but that he was chosen by God, and thus God would not let him make mistakes. Therefore he did not need to pay attention to graybeards like Bismarck, that he did not need to study problems or think deeply about questions; he could just whip out an answer on the spur of the moment, because God would not let him make a mistake.
That is the problem with ever new generation when young. They are convinced they are immune to the mistakes of the previous generations, that they cannot make mistakes, that their fresh insight is devoid of the baggage of old age.
In other words, while Douglas Murray may well have the right interpretation of the current generation, he makes the mistake of thinking it applies only to this current generation :-O
All throughout history, leaders often felt as if they're anointed, chosen by god, were gods etc. That's nothing new. That's a very different thing from the Barista at Starbucks feeling XE is anointed. And that's the fundamental difference we have now.
Basically, there is no "right side of history" unless people who are in the right act to make it so. Hopefully, these scared little rabbits will be too paralyzed with fear to act.
Every generation produces its leaders and followers and their attitudes and mores develop as time marches on, ideologies reveal their flaws, parents evolve from loving parents to the stupid tyrants and then back to the loving parents.
The fact that there are at least 27% who have some common sense is actually encouraging. What is more frightening is that 17% of 50 and over think that losing their job over an opinion is an acceptable price. Or maybe the disturbing par is that in either group, there's a good quarter of the population that leave that question blank. Apparently, this is the group who walk into a voting booth not sure who they are going to pull the lever for.
Well, it's hard to say about the 17% over age 50. They may well have adopted frugal and financially wise habits and have enough money accumulated that they can say "Fuck You" to anybody who threatens to fire them.
And people leaving the question blank may well be the greatest fighters against censorship and cancel culture of all. As Monty Python's Flying Circus observed: "If they can't see you, they can't get you!"
How Not To Be Seen
https://youtu.be/C-M2hs3sXGo
Looks like a total failure of the libertarian movement to explain individual liberty in a way that resonates with young people. LP, SFL, YAL, etc. need to figure out what isn't being said in an effective manner.
Now that the little Special Snowflake shits are paralyed in their own fear, this is the time for Libertarians to act.
An individual aged 18–25 who fears cancellation has a nearly 60% chance of agreeing that this is a justifiable price to pay to protect minorities
I would be real interested to hear if their public school indoctrination/education has imbued them with the ability to make a cogent argument that the former has one fucking thing to do with the latter.
When I see research like this I often wonder whether it's correlated to generational cohort, or age cohort. IE, when the 18-25 year olds are 35-45, will they hold the same opinions, or will they align more with today's 35-45 year olds?
The reason I ask this is because younger people wanting the government to take more actions seems to indicate a lack of first hand experience of government action
When they're 35-45, they'll be in charge of the government.
Look how the boomers who protested against the government turned out. Remember, Eric Holder spent his college years occupying administration buildings. Think about that.
They changed their tune about the Man when they became the Man, because now they have something to lose. Young people are very often commies because they haven't reached the point in their lives where they have anything significant to lose. Once there's a house and a mortgage, a couple of kids, some car loans, and an IRA involved, things change REAL fast. The Commie Youth aren't so fond of redistribution when it's their own shit being redistributed.
The problem isn't that the yutes are commies. The unique problem now is that online platforms give them the ability to do significant damage to others, that prior generations of Commie Youths didn't have. As a Gen Xer, the commie teenagers in my high school and college only had reach within that population, and MAYBE a little outside of it. Now, anyone can go on the Twitters and assisinate pretty much anyone else, anywhere in the world.
I don't know what the solution is. Technology and the internet, on the whole, has been a net good for society, I think, so I don't support massive crackdowns on internet speech. But it IS a problem in that it gives SJWs outsized ability to do catastrophic harm, not just to individuals who get canceled, but also to those who police their own speech out not fear of cancelation.
Whatever we do, we definitely can't use their own tactics against them.
Beatings might work, though.
I've often said that the primary reason for the proliferation of stupidity is that we have taken all the pain out of the consequences. The shit that is often seen on Twitter could get you throat-punched when I was in HS. You didn't quit your job because you got offended by someone's opinion. If you OD'd, there was no Naloxone and you were likely purged from society and cremated by the county.
There were consequences to every behavior and few people thought to save you from those. We all did stupid shit, but it hurt, we mostly lived and we mostly learned so that we could go out and do other stupid shit.
Not necessarily. Libertarian freedom of association (as well as the lack of protected legal status for political views) means a Libertarian employer could refuse to hire known Totalitarians like these Neo-Maoist Woke little shits.
Also, there's nothing that says we have to save the Woke from censoring and cancelling each other. As Sun-Tzu observed, "Never stand in the way of your enemy when the enemy is about to make a mistake." And when two enemies make the same mistake against each other, it's an even bigger win. And when the last one guillotines himself, Jackpot!
I don't know what the solution is. Technology and the internet, on the whole, has been a net good for society, I think, so I don't support massive crackdowns on internet speech.
I tend to agree, but I agree with more caveats and asterisks than I would have say, ten to fifteen years ago. Some of my earlier predictions about the internet have come true. Right at the time we began to see the real fruits of the democratization of information, both received and transmitted was when the establishment went into panic mode, and that same tool has become incredibly useful for spying and interference with individuals on a level never before imagined.
if they're so paralyzed with fear of being cancelled, maybe at that age, they'll still be living in Mommy's basememt and will have no chance to impose their mental illness on the rest of us! Libertarians Pounce!
I also think that people under 30 don't have the same sort of job/career investment that older people do. When they're thinking of losing their job, it's very entry-level stuff. The youngest demographic work as cashiers or at fast food places, and if they lose that job, there's still hundreds of equally profitable jobs.
It's when you get into a demographic where you've invested a significant amount of time and education for your career that the scale shifts. Your job is something you've put years of your life into and your reputation has value. If you lose that job due to reputational concerns, you're losing significant value because that loss of reputation attaches to you for future job prospects. You're much less likely to transition to something else with the same pay and benefit scale as the job you lose, which isn't the case for young adults. Likewise, they haven't yet built families and taken positions of responsibility where that family relies on them and their income. When you're at the point in your life that your job is necessary to make sure your own children have food and some nice clothes, you're not going to take a beating just to service the nebulous needs of the historically disadvantaged.
Yet another set of beauties about being Fhildfree By Choice. No children means no pawns for the Gummint Skoolz and the brainwashing du jour. Also, if you are Childfree By Choice, you are a greater asset to employers than young farts who may have worse work ethics and also import Wokeism to the workplace to boot, and have more disposable income to deal with mini-Cultural Revolutions.
In addition to the age cohort, we need to recognize cultural groups. I will bet these numbers are skewed towards urban-suburban college graduates.
Can't control the Red Guard!
Everyone who supports job, career and potentially life destroying cancel policies deserves to be first in line to be cancelled.
Same goes for left wing fascist Canadians (who call themselves liberals) who supported and helped tyrant Trudeau declare and extend a phony emergency to seize bodies, property and bank accounts of freedom loving Canadians.
"Emotional safety"
In short form, they want to cancel people fpr speech because the speech hurt people's feelings.
Critical theory: everything is a power struggle and words are weapons.
"Emotional safety"
Basically, the Berlatsky doctrine.
I don't know what a 'gender critical woman' is.
Had to look it up. It means "anti-trans feminist." For example lesbians who don't tolerate biological males at their favorite bar.
So a not completely insane feminist?
No, just a different
monthly flavorFlavor of the Month.Oh a terf. Ok.
Well honestly, a trans-lesbian is kinda cheating, isn't it? At the very least confused and likely very lonely as you've really narrowed down the prospects to those who zigzag with you, are too drunk to notice, or just don't have minimal requirements.
Slower swimmers?
So, "critical" is alright when it's "Critical Race Theory," but "critical" is not all right when it's "gender critical"? Man, I'm confused.
Now I know why I like Jeremiah Johnson and Grizzly Adams so much. 🙂
There has been a rising risk of testicular and prostate cancer among women.
Please, we're trying to eat lunch here. 🙂
Uncomfortable having ounch with a gender-critical woman or unsure...Uncomfortable having lunch with a asanders supporter or unsure...Uncomfortable having lunch with a Trump supporter or unsure .
With lunch buddies like these, I'm glad I eat my lunch alone, otherwise I'd lose my lunch.
Lol
"Redundant." - Al Bundy
In the War of Words, the term 'gender uncritical woman' has come to mean 'A woman that criticizes all the other genders except mine.'
https://twitter.com/lulumeservey/status/1496503040882483201?t=pA3BPgdvS3IY4wvCy-c7Fw&s=19
The Canadian government has proposed legislation (Bill C-36) where people can be taken to court and penalized if they’re suspected of being ABOUT TO post something hateful online.
An individual would be able to report another PREEMPTIVELY for something they haven’t said yet.
Alarming aspects, in ascending order:
1) Fuzzy and circular definition of “hateful” speech (“involves detestation…stronger than dislike”)
2) Encouraging citizens to report on one another — creepy
3) The ability to punish people for something they haven’t actually done yet (!)
That's just one finding of the report, which describes young people's affinity for what it calls cultural socialism, a worldview that "values equal results and harm prevention for identity groups over individual rights" and "has inspired race-based pedagogies and harsh punishments for controversial speech."
The classic liberal dilemma: at what point should tolerance for anti-libertarian values stop?
I would be happier if our national club required members to swear that they accepted fundamental freedoms for all. Those who disagree would then find another club.
There's a national club for people like us? Where is it, so I can avoid it?
You love freedom of expression so much you want to purge everyone who thinks the wrong things.
Try again, Tony. We can coexist only as long as you do not act to limit what I say. At that point I will be forced to expel you.
No tyrant can tolerate an opposing opinion.
Looks like Trudeau (and his cancellation of freedom loving Canadians) has created a split among American Democrats under 35 with older ones (most of whom support Trudeau's dictatorship).
"When broken down by party affiliation, 65 percent of US Democrats backed Trudeau’s heavy-handed response compared to 17 percent who disapproved, while 87 percent of likely Republican voters opposed the prime minister’s crackdown and 8 percent approved.
One hundred percent of young voters, meanwhile, (those 25 to 35-years-old), disapproved of Trudeau’s response."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2022/02/23/poll-approve-of-trudeaus-crackdown-on-protesters-n2603629
Given that at least 75% of Democrats are female and/or gay, Trudeau appeals to many (especially the younger ones) as a CILF.
CILF? Is the "C" for "Cannuck," "Communist,", or "Cunt?" Or Yes?
Of course it's a democrat.
Keep sucking that leftist dick, robby
https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1496509095133822978?t=jQcxta1ndPPfbUbWlTwvJw&s=19
Who cares?
"Attending a middle-school sleepover, getting drunk, taking sleeping pills, berating a bunch of pre-teens, and vomiting in a hamper is not a good look if you’re trying to get elected to Congress. [Link]"
Obviously the solution is for them all to lose their jobs, since they know in their hearts they have or will commit such a crime.
No doubt you lovers of freedom and free speech are outraged that TRUTH has banned DevinNunesCow.
This must not stand!!
But I don't think of TRUTH Social, or Devin Nunes, or you.
What and who?
But if younger millennials and members of Gen Z have more to fear from cancel culture, they are also much more willing to say that they accept these terms.
Sooner or later, Gen Fuck You will arise and reject cancel culture.
You men we here aren't Gen Fuck You, regardless of our ages?
By the way. Wouldn't. Ever. Not even laying prone bone with two bags in pitch blackness.
Cellphones have rendered this generation incapable of reasoned thought. They are ill educated idiots.
I think that if the past two decades have taught us anything, its that it's more likely that cellphones/social media are a filter against rational thought.
"A plurality of young people think their fear of losing job opportunities is a price worth paying to remedy past injustices."
Anyone who believes that past injustices can be remedied by lost job opportunities today is insane or an idiot.
You forgot evil and unscrupulous grifter as options for the and conjunction.
Man, fuck you guys. "Cultural socialism." You'd think this horseshit conservative think tank could come up with terms that aren't cribbed directly from Mein Kampf, but I understand that's all the rage these days.
"Cultural socialism" isn't a thing. Socialism is an economic model in which workplaces are democratized. Socialism is no more or less "collective" than capitalism, it's just that in capitalism the collective is all ruled by a single boss.
Indeed, the logical thing to say is that socialism, i.e., democracy in the workplace, is more conducive to individual liberties than a system in which everyone is under the yoke of a fucking tyrant.
But of course, these are all buzzwords meant to turn your brains off. This nonsense study, as your little graph shows, reveals little other than that people are still in their partisan tribes and tolerate freedom only to the extent that it applies to their own tribe.
Yeah, all those capitalist dictators that impose job roles, work quotas, arbitrary rewards, proscribed housing, food rations, and punishment for dissension.
Spoken like somebody with no marketable skills or work ethic.
All the capitalist dictators I've known have been fucking capricious morons. And I mean all.
Given the source of this opinion, your definition of capitalist dictators, the probability that you've actually met let alone "known" any of them, and the irony of this post including the word capricious, I congratulate you on packing a full paragraph of silly into one concise sentence.
Awww, we triggered Tony.
Seethe more, fascist.
"Cultural Socialism" wasn't in Mein Kampf. "National Socialism" was.
And Capitalism also means the individual entrepreneur who breaks off of an unwanted corporate culture to create his own work culture more to his or her own liking.
Capitalism also means workers pooling their pin money and butter-'n'-egg money and purchasing stock shares or even opting to get investments automatically withheld to accumulate shares via Dollar Cost Averaging. This method assures that you invest more when shares cost less and less when shares cost more and the greater number of shares accumulated means a bigger treasure trove. This enables workers to either influence corporate culture via shareholders meetings or by starting their own businesses or breaking off and retiring earlier.
Free-Market Capitalism is the greatest liberator of the worker ever devised if only it is allowed to operate. Discover it sometime while you can, or at least stay the Hell out of the way.
"Rather than viewing such individuals as thin-skinned or inconsistent, we should consider them to be adhering to a consistent set of ideas that places the emotional safety and advancement of minority groups above their personal freedom of expression," he writes.
Yes, they are. And that is both scary and disheartening. I blame the rise of "therapy culture" for the idea that "emotional safety" should take priority over personal freedom of expression. I likewise blame it for the report a few weeks ago about how language dealing with emotions has become more prevalent generally, and language dealing with logic less prevalent, over the last decade or so. These are trends that can't bode well for our society, and need to be pushed back against.
Collectivist thinking is becoming the norm.
We're all in this together!! (barf)
Nowadays, it's: "We're all in this together...apart!" (Double barf!)
But a small school district in Tennessee banned "Maus"! Isn't that infringement on free expression as bad as all the cancel culture from the left? WDYT OBL?
Name a single person who has been canceled by "the left."
1984 is not a dystopian novel to the left - it's a plan.
The INGSOC Party leadership from 1984 couldn't have dreamt of some of the things the modern left sees as clear moral imperatives. I'm almost shocked that the WaPo masthead hasn't already been changed to read "Ignorance is Strength".
If Stalin could have been brought to the year 2021, the first thing he'd have wanted to know is how Biden got so much of the media to be so obedient about unquestioningly towing the party line being pushed by his administration.
On the contrary, it seems that many young people are taking a self-sacrificial attitude.
This is a poor explanation. It focuses on what is different about the young. But in reality the difference is in the older workers. They've been around long enough to see how activists manipulate the standards and language. The result is that cancel culture has nothing to do with "protecting historically disadvantaged groups". It's a game elites engage in because they've never learned how to be productive. The idea that people's lives should be sacrificed for their game is offensive. The young are too naïve to understand this reality.
Did anyone ask the 18-25 year olds whether they're also on board with the possibility of losing their livliehoods/reputations 25 years from now if something they've posted recently comes to be deemed on the "wrong side of history" even if it's something that's considered "progressive" in the current cultural context?
50 year-olds aren't on board because they're watching their peers get destroyed in some case for comments that are older than today's 18 year-olds, and didn't come to be deemed "inappropriate" for a decade or more after they were made.
"An individual aged 18–25 who fears cancellation has a nearly 60% chance of agreeing that this is a justifiable price to pay to protect minorities"
Just swap minorities with "White Male" and watch your statistics sling shot around like a boomerang.
HELLO! Most young people are indoctrinated to be racist and sexist under the disguised word of "minority" (and taught denial and projection of what they are being taught). Thank your Nazi-Commie Education requirements for that one.
Remember when "fair" included everyone instead of just the "minority" class ???????????????
As with every totalitarian sh*thole nation. There will be a CONSTANT and DESTRUCTIVE class war on who controls that power.
The USA was founded to have VERY LIMITED Power for that very reason; the more people and politicians ignore that the worse it will get.
THE REAL ROOT OF EVERY PROBLEM IN THE USA IS A GOVERNMENT WILL FULL POWER OVER EVERYTHING....
Obey the U.S. Constitution - limit the Power and there won't be Power-Mad struggles, hatred, disruptions, and etc, etc, etc.... Don't feed the Power-Mad Bears.
It is a sad commentary. Speaking with a younger person a few months back I had said just because something offends you doesn't justify censorship of it. They were astonished at that thought. Then when I said if I were to be elected and found their support of socialist leaning policies to be offensive should I be free to censor them. They looked entirely confused.
Today’s youth have been raised in fascist captivity, like kidnapping victims they have accepted their captivity and believe in the benevolence of their betters.
All they hope is that their velvet chains are comfortable.
Not really what the founders of the constitution envisioned for the republic.
Well except for the 33% of the Freemasons among them.
If there was one unambiguous form of speech that was responsible for all corruption, all conflict and had no redeeming qualities, would you support criminalizing it?
Criminalize lying.
synthetic oligos
We can provide more than 40 types of chemical modifications and hundreds of common modifications to meet our customers’ sequence synthesis and modification requirements. https://rna.bocsci.com/products-services/oligo-synthesis-service.html
"Let them be afraid"
"Yes, I am afraid of arbitrary government power, but I think it is a good thing" is the kind of non-committal answer you give when you are, in fact, afraid but do not want to signal your opposition (again, because you are actually afraid).
I was considering this 'data' in light of Reason's recent 'data' about 20% of younguns identifying as LGBTQ (and Reason's consistent reporting about falling birth rates and the myth of hookup culture).
"We've shamed more kids into having less sex and telling us they're LGBTQ anyway out of fear. Hoorah!"
[JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. Last month I got cheek of nearly 30,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go office, Its home online job. cqr You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
..
SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
The pro-censorship/cancel culture are a greater percentage than the ones identifying as LGBTQ+. So most likely it is a Venn Diagram more than a one-to-one correlation.
LGBTQ+ people with any social awareness and sense of history know all-too-well the dangers of censorship and cancellation.
Well said. This (one-sided) indoctrination is a form of child abuse..pure & simple.