Public Confidence in the Military Is Slipping
The drop in public trust has finally come for the Pentagon too.

It's no secret that public trust in institutions is in free fall. In 1958, when Americans were first asked by the National Election Study about their trust in the government, 73 percent of respondents said they could trust the government to do the right thing always or most of the time. In 2021, that number dwindled to 24 percent. The military, meanwhile, historically went unscathed—until now.
According to the Pew Research Center's latest poll, only a quarter of Americans have a great deal of confidence that the military actually acts in the public's best interest, a drop of 14 points since November 2020.
Andrew Bacevich, president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, cites a few explanations for this loss of confidence. "Rather than 'above' politics, the military is becoming subsumed into politics," says Bacevich. He believes that there are three main reasons for this: the military's mixed performance, its increased entanglement in partisan issues, and the politicization of everything, which means that "nothing is off limits" (not even the military).
"Trust in everything is down, and the obvious answer is that post-9/11 wars have not gone well," the Atlantic Council's Christopher Preble tells Reason. Preble also feels that the question's oversimplification doesn't fully capture the issue. He wonders whether the recent decline is in response to dishonest senior military officials or the armed forces as a whole, preferring to "drill down" into Pew's specific meaning of the military. To Preble, there is a very obvious difference between "the boots on the ground and the brass."
The Ronald Reagan Institute found, for the very first time since it began its national defense survey in 2018, that "a minority of Americans—only 45%—report having a great deal of trust and confidence in the military." Probing further, it discovered that the most common reason behind why people had low trust in the military was due to political leadership, followed by service members and scandals within the military.
Americans haven't lost all confidence in the military, but they are starting to realize that it's no longer insulated from a broader loss of trust in institutions. A majority of Americans—74 percent—still express "at least a fair amount of confidence in the military to act in the public's best interests." However, having a "fair amount" of trust in the institution that is ensuring your safety and security isn't exactly brag-worthy.
The hard truth is that not many Americans pay attention to the military until it affects them personally. But in August 2021, as the U.S. left Afghanistan in the middle of the night, Americans watched as two decades' worth of progress in the country was wiped away almost instantly.
As soon as U.S. troops entered Afghanistan in 2001, the American public was repeatedly fed lies about how the mission was going smoothly. In 2013, during a press briefing, then–Army Lt. Gen. Mark Milley praised the Afghan forces: "This army and this police force have been very, very effective in combat against the insurgents every single day. And I think that's an important story to be told across the board." No wonder the public was stunned when, eight years after Milley's comments, Afghan forces only lasted a matter of weeks when the U.S. left them to defend their country against the Taliban.
There is an inherent irony here that Preble has pointed out. "The most charitable thing that can be said is that individuals were shading the truth for a higher purpose," he wrote. "They downplayed unpleasant facts to maintain a modicum of public support." As it turns out, downplaying the truth doesn't help you gain support.
Kelley Vlahos, editorial director of Responsible Statecraft and senior adviser at the Quincy Institute, wrote of a "silver lining" in this declining trust—"Americans won't put the military on a pedestal again until it deserves it." The erosion of public confidence in the military to do what's best isn't all that shocking. Now is the time for "critical thinking, moral courage, and a merit-based system in the military," Vlahos argued.
When a group repeatedly hides the truth, glosses over issues, and misuses funds, it should be cause for concern. Other than scientists, the military remains more trusted than any other group included in Pew's survey, but it's finally facing the skepticism that it deserves.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
5 years ago I believed if a president tried to sic the US military in its own people the generals wouldn't go along with it. Now I believe that would only be true if the president was republican.
Yeah, well, 5 years ago this country hadn't been traumatized by 1 / 6. Which was even worse than 9 / 11.
#LibertariansForUsingTheMilitaryAgainstDomesticPoliticalEnemies
You joke, but yeah, watching the hysteria over something so mild did help convince me that people would be willing to use the military against peaceful citizens.
Just as a point of fact, the only time a president sicced the military on it's own people was under a Republican administration.
Washington was a republican when he put down the whiskey rebelion? Jackson was a republican when he marched the Cherokee to their death on the trail of tears?
Uh, you do know LBJ sent the Army into Detroit, right?
I think obama may have droned a citizen or two as well.
The most knowledgeable Reason commenter on economic issues is also quite well informed on military affairs. And he was kind enough to share two key insights:
(1) Those last couple weeks in Afghanistan were no big deal ("SLOPPY PULLOUT!") and shouldn't affect our perception of Joe Biden, and ...
(2) OK, maybe Afghanistan was a humiliating debacle — and it was all Drumpf's fault.
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
Finally some good news.
What could have changed since November 2020?
confidence in *who is running* the military definitely slipping.
That is just it. The top military leaders made it clear they were Democrats and had no interest in following the President's orders when that President was Trump or some other Republican they didn't like.
The thing about getting involved in politics is that you can never be partisan enough for whichever side you take. Eventually, you will disappoint them as well. So you end up respected by no one and loathed by everyone.
Now that the military has been culturally purified it can be used against the American people.
"But in August 2021, as the U.S. left Afghanistan in the middle of the night, Americans watched as two decades' worth of progress in the country was wiped away almost instantly."
Sorry, but in Aug 21, Americans watched as two decades of non-progress was revealed to the world. Conditions in 2021 weren't much different than in 2001. There was no "progress".
Yeh, that was a laugh worthy of the WaPo or NYT, not an alleged libertarian rag. Psaki seems to have taken a side job ahead of the midterms.
Politicization, lies from whichever administration is current, the dishonesty and incompetence of career leaders are not the military any more than the US is its fucked up government. The former are all symptoms of a cultural and political sickness that has been present for decades, that the vast majority of the spineless kneejerk sorts have zero incentive to eradicate. The same can be said for corruption and lack of ethics within federal, state and local government, any business management, news media and the bloated education and non-profit sectors. It would be closer to the truth, but not revealed by these pols, that with a few notable exceptions, people tend to put their own interests before those of others, except when making claims about their virtues.
Please explain all the ways Trump politicized the military
Did Dowzicky seriously just refer to the Afghan War as “two decade’s worth of progress”?!
The snark in me wants to think "Dowzicky" bears a striking vowel-consonant resemblance to "Psaki" and "Baghdad Bob".
If more Americans trusted the government to do the right thing when segregation and Jim Crow ruled then today, you are really fucking it up.
Ike ordered the 101st Airborne into Little Rock AR to integrate a high school in 1957.
I doubt anyone who has served in the last 20 years was surprised by the performance of the Afghan army. I did my War on Terror time in Iraq but have lots of friends who deployed to Afghanistan. Nothing I heard ever made me think that we were able to create a professional military in that region. Too much tribal politics got in the way. The idea of serving some national government is just too foreign a concept to that part of the world.
Getting them to do Jumping Jacks together was beyond hope. I've seen the video.
I gathered that much from (a) history and (b) media reports. All the sugar coating just made it even less believable.
Similar experience. I have never spoken with a fellow service member who had any faith in the Iraqi or Afghani governments, military, or society. None. Not one person who went over there had any faith in them.
Yup. This.
A backwards, silly people. -Lawrence
"Americans watched as two decades' worth of progress in the country was wiped away almost instantly." More like two decades worth of pointless nation building efforts after a successful reprisal. Afghanistan needed to be taught a lesson about the bull and the horns, not about Thomas Jefferson. And it doesn't take decades to teach the first lesson.
The main building efforts weren’t pointless. They allowed many billions of taxpayer dollars to be transferred to government contractors, whose corporate owners would then donate generously to the two parties.
Maybe Army Chief of Staff Milley should spend less time reading Ibram X Khendi and a little more time reading Otto Von Moltke.
Carl von Clausewitz
Land Warfare for Dummies would be am improvement.
Dr Seuse would be an improvement.
Americans watched as two decades' worth of progress in the country was wiped away almost instantly.
1. Not the military's fault.
2. The Afghans had 2 decades to stand up. They didn't.
I suspect most afghans viewed Americans as foreign invaders trying to destroy their culture and way of life.
Urban Afghans greeted us as chumps bearing free money for corrupt elites and good-paying jobs with a promised green card for the collaborator and his extended family.
Political purges will do that.
We'd be in big trouble if we ever had to fight a world-class power that had their shit together. Our "woke" generals and admirals would be easily and quickly ourgeneraled and outadmiraled. The "political" generals and admirals have long since supplanted the warfighters. The military academies have gone "woke" and need to be closed down. Too expensive, produce too few officers. Luckily for us, our most likely world-class adversaries, Russia and China, are at least as screwed up as we are, in their own ways.
Yeah, the military's been so corporatized and Ivy League'd at this point that the brass these days are nothing more than CEOs and board members, not warriors. Schwarzkopf was probably the last true warfighter the US military had.
The best officer I ever had during my time in the military never made it past O-6. Neither did John Boyd, the guy who was responsible for the development of the A-10, F-15, and F-16, along with the OODA Loop theory of warfare that these balloonheads all spout, but don't understand.
Considering our top military brass met privately with China to assure them that they would be given a heads-up in the event of any military action against them, I don't think anybody besides American citizens has anything to fear from the American military. A bunch of faggot trannies led by tranny faggots with no balls who sit on their ass calling in air strikes to murder defenseless women and children isn't equipped to do anything except sit on its collective ass calling in airstrikes to murder defenseless women and children. American "soldiers" are cowardly pieces of shit. They deserve to die at the hands of a competent enemy.
After General Vindman testified against Trump at impeachment and General Miley stated white rage was our great problem, normal people lost confidence that our military would only kill our foreign enemies.
It sure looked like the top brass were democrats who were against the half of Americans who are white and pro Trump.
Not a good look for the defenders of the entire nation
The draft needs to be reinstated with a no deferrals-no exemptions rule and totally RANDOM lottery.
You need 600 medical doctors: in the hopper cage goes candidate doctors one year from graduation to established doctors up to age 35.
Same for nurses, IT professionals, translators, mechanics, etc.
Two years is a pittance when weighed against the benefits living in the USA offers. Random selection is fair an unbiased.
Dennis Trigubetz
Los Angeles