There Are Many Problems With Democrats' Plan for a Federal Gas Tax Holiday
A federal gasoline tax holiday would undermine the user fee system for funding highways and could worsen inflation.

With average gas prices in the U.S. popping above $3.50 per gallon, about a dollar more than drivers were paying at this time last year, President Joe Biden has started making vague promises of government action.
"I'm going to work like the devil to bring gas prices down," Biden said last week, before repeating the line in a speech at a gathering of county officials on Monday.
It's a bizarre sentiment that overstates the president's role in setting gas prices, though it's understandable why the White House is worried: Gas prices are treated, often inaccurately, as a proxy for the country's economic health.
There are two factors driving gas prices higher right now. The first is simple supply and demand. Like with just about every other commodity, crude oil experienced a bust during the lowest point of the pandemic and is now booming as global demand increases and the supply lines struggle to keep up, resulting in higher prices. Global oil production is ramping up, but it will take time for that increased availability to be reflected at the pump.
There's not much to be done about these global supply-and-demand issues. In response to high gasoline prices in November, Biden authorized the largest-ever release of crude oil from America's strategic reserves. That temporarily lowered prices, but three months later it's obvious that was a short-term fix.
The second factor driving up prices is inflation. Prices are up 7.5 percent over the past 12 months, and fuel prices have seen some of the largest increases—gasoline prices have shot up by 40 percent since January 2021. A lot of that is due to the supply and demand issues, but at least some of it is a reflection of widespread, persistent price inflation across the economy as a whole: a dollar today would buy less gasoline than it did a year ago, even if all other factors were equal.
Biden does have some control over that, and misused it. Pretty much every economist who reviewed Biden's $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan before Congress passed it in March 2021 warned that dumping so much new spending into an already-recovering economy was a recipe for inflation. Turns out they were right. There's no way to undo that spending now.
Unfortunately, the White House and congressional Democrats now appear to be mulling a plan to attack high gas prices that could cause a short-term price dip while making inflation worse in the long run.
Sens. Mark Kelly (D–Ariz.) and Maggie Hassan (D–N.H.) have introduced a bill to temporarily suspend the federal gas tax through the end of the year. (Kelly and Hassan are both seeking reelection in November.) While the Biden administration has not signaled its support for the bill specifically, The Washington Post reports that White House officials are debating it behind the scenes.
A gas tax holiday means not paying $0.18 to the federal government for every gallon of gas you put in your car, and it's encouraging to see Democratic lawmakers openly admit that cutting taxes is a way to help ordinary Americans by simply letting people keep more of their money.
But as a means of lowering gas prices or curbing inflation, a gas tax holiday is almost certain to fail.
On principle, if we have to pay taxes, then the gas tax is pretty much the ideal way to do it. It's a flat user fee that charges more to people who consume more gasoline, and the revenue is directed to the Federal Highway Trust Fund to pay for federal road projects. It's about as fair as any tax system could hope to be. But suspending the gas tax—and doing so for what are pretty obviously political reasons—creates a number of practical problems.
First, it would blow an estimated $20 billion hole in the Highway Trust Fund at a time when the fund is already slinking toward insolvency. That hole would have to be filled sooner or later by either raising taxes, transferring revenue from somewhere else, or reducing the number of fund projects.
Coming on the heels of the Biden administration's massive infrastructure bill, which has already weakened the historical norm of using user fees (like the gas tax) to fund road and bridge projects, this would constitute another step toward forcing a broad base of taxpayers to pay for infrastructure projects they might not use.
The more immediate problem, however, is that there are two possible outcomes of a gas tax holiday. Either the tax break will be significant enough to artificially depress prices at the pump, which necessarily translates into drivers being encouraged to buy more gasoline—or…it won't be.
Both of these seemingly contradictory outcomes are actually problematic if the White House's goal is to simultaneously reduce inflation and score political points for the effort.
Experts are mixed on which outcome is likely, but there are good arguments for both.
Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank, tells CBS News that suspending the federal gas tax would save Americans only about $2 per week. That's probably not enough for most drivers to notice the difference—particularly because gas prices are so notoriously volatile and can change dramatically from place to place due to state and local taxes and the vagaries of the marketplace (near my home in Culpeper, Virginia, prices are generally 50 cents cheaper than near the Reason office in Washington, D.C., about 70 miles away).
What good is a major, explicitly political, intervention in the market if no one notices? Biden's unloading of 50 million barrels of oil from the strategic stockpile less than three months ago hasn't helped Democrats' electoral prospects, and it's likely that a gas tax holiday would generate some positive headlines before being quickly forgotten.
On the other hand, what if it works? Then the White House will have an even bigger problem because lowering prices enough to get them noticed would translate into greater consumption of gasoline. And what does that mean?
"By boosting demand in an already over-stimulated economy, the holiday would likely boost inflation in 2023 once it ends," Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that advocates for balanced budgets, said in a statement on Monday.
In other words, higher prices are a signal to consumers to consume less. Though there are obvious political incentives for the White House and congressional Democrats to lower prices—and not just gas prices—those same higher-than-normal prices are the market's way of working out the ongoing disconnect between supply and demand that's driving inflation. Instead of letting that mechanism work, any attempt to lower prices will only make the situation worse by stimulating demand. And remember, a gas tax can't increase the supply of gasoline.
"While cutting the gas tax may have political appeal, it would move in exactly the wrong direction, worsening rather than improving our nation's economic challenges," says MacGuineas.
More broadly, this debate over the gas tax holiday reflects the damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't problem that has dogged the Biden administration since it took office. Like with the $1.9 trillion stimulus package passed last year, the political impulse to make it look like the White House is doing something is tempting. Doing nothing in situations where you can't meaningfully impact the outcome, like with gas prices, is often the better idea, no matter what voters might think.
In that regard, Sen. Joe Machin (D–W.Va.) might once again save the White House from making a policy misstep. Asked Monday by reporters whether he, a crucial swing-vote in the Senate, would support a federal gas tax holiday, Manchin was quick to dismiss the idea.
"Our trust funds are broke…want to break them more?" Manchin said, according to CNN's Manu Raju. "It doesn't make sense."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
#LibertariansAgainstTaxHolidays ????
I'm not seeing the downside, just amused that Dems are getting on board and not worrying about the climate impact.
[JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. Last month I got cheek of nearly 30,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go office, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
..
SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
I guess if we're going to spend money that doesn't exist on everything else we might as well do it on highways too. Though I think that the point made in the article that gas taxes are the best way to do taxation if you have to do it is pretty valid. At least in the ideal.
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA02 I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail …. http://guest.link/TCu
The lower the tax rate, the higher the share of the pump price that goes to OPEC and Russia. Econ 101, I hope.
Morons in Congress.
As I discussed in https://seekingalpha.com/article/4472745 the problem is the Renewable Fuel Standard program administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In order to sell a gallon of gasoline in the USA one must purchase a renewable identification number (RIN). These are created when renewable fuels such as ethanol are produced. The cost of these RINs has surged and has driven up the cost of gasoline. Refiners have a few years to satisfy their RIN obligations. Had the administration not recently retroactively reduced the amount of RINs that refiners are obligated for 2020, the price of gasoline would have surged above $10. During 2019 and 2020, the prices of ethanol renewable identification numbers were below 20 cents per gallon. However, the price of RINs credits bought by obligated parties to meet the RFS renewable volume obligation reached record quarterly highs in Q3, averaging $1.545/RIN for ethanol. It was assumed that such high prices would prompt revisions in the program. However, when reports of the possibility of such revisions appeared in the press, the farm lobby warned the Biden Administration against doing so.
In December 2021, the Biden administration addressed the threat of an imminent further surge gasoline prices with the retroactive reduction in the 2020 RIN requirements. However, to placate the farm lobby, the administration announced plans to vastly increase the RIN obligations for the years 2022 and beyond. Were those planned increases in RIN obligations to occur, it could produce double-digit per gallon gasoline prices, regardless of what happened to crude oil prices. My guess is that the administration will make adjustments in the planned increases in RIN obligations so as to avoid a multi-dollar increase in gasoline prices..." https://seekingalpha.com/article/4476775
Guess Reason's assertion that crypto will solve the authoritarian actions against convoy protests just went kaput.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/canada-freezes-at-least-34-crypto-wallets-funding-freedom-convoy
authoritarian actions? What authoritarian actions?
Reason
Not happening, and good for you.
You'll note they can't actually take the funds, they're telling banks to take the funds if those funds turn into not-crypto. All it takes is one person to tell the Canadian government to fuck off.
----
Canadian authorities have ordered the nation's regulated financial firms to halt the facilitation of any transactions from at least 34 crypto wallets connected to the funding of the "Freedom Convoy" protests.
-----
Of course, that person will be arrested as a terrorist if he tries.
An unintentionally hilarious line from Yahoo:
The federal authorities have identified around 29 Bitcoin addresses that have been reported to exchange the digital asset which is worth between $0 and $1.1 million.
You'll note they can't actually take the funds, they're telling banks to take the funds if those funds turn into not-crypto.
You'll also note that any business accepting coins from these wallets has a public record of their being an accessory to terrorism. Whereas if $1000 cash turned up in the local restaurant's till, it could've been anyone who used that money to buy food and the government would still have to go hunt down and seize the rest of the pseudonymous, decentralized pile of cash.
My point is that people are not financial regulators. They do not have to abide by these rules.
That won't stop the guys with guns from confiscating it, though.
Yes. The tyranny is out in the open here. It's sort of amazing that the 'leaders' don't understand what this whole thing means. They block money from source A, so people go to B. Then they block B, so people go to C. If we block C, then.......?
If you leave people no option but to psychically go to Ottawa and pass cash to the truckers, that's what they will do.
lol physically, although psychically would be even better
Ban cash - serious shit
So…. Send Dr. Strange with the cash?
I feel like we should run on the banks, brokerages and mattress stuff cash. If banks and financial institutions are willing to obey, then FUCK banks and financial institutions.
That might be happening in Canada.
Some libertarian coverage of Trudeau for those of you feeling a little bereft...
Blocking major international trade chokepoints is not a peaceful protest. It's sabotage and it's violence because they're using force to stop the free movement of goods and people.
https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2021/07/13/demonstrators-block-traffic-i35e-dallas-support-cuban-protests/
https://komonews.com/news/local/12-arrested-after-protesters-block-i-5-lanes-in-seattle
https://www.wpri.com/news/local-news/providence/protesters-block-i-95-with-u-haul-bring-traffic-to-a-standstill/
What about forcefully shutting down international trade? Is that sabotage and violence because it's stopping the free movement of goods and people?
It's sabotage and it's violence because they're using force to stop the free movement of goods and people.
How is it worse than lockdowns? Show your work.
Those stay at home orders were temporary and designed to prevent catastrophic death and the collapse of hospitals. We didn't have vaccines or good therapeutics. We didn't have a great understanding of what exactly we were up against. Look I got no problem with people protesting vax mandates. My issue was the way they went about it.
designed to prevent catastrophic death and the collapse of hospitals
LOL!
"...designed to prevent catastrophic death and the collapse of hospitals..."
Had to look to see which slimy pile of lefty shit produced *THAT* bullshit; no surprise.
Shit lord has been full of it from the day s/he showed up.
It doesn't matter what they were DESIGNED to do. They shut down the international border for over a year. Shouldn't Trudeau be the first one arrested? (Yes)
Those
stay at home orderstrucker protests were temporary and designed to prevent catastrophicdeathgovernment overreach and the collapse ofhospitals.human rights.^THIS^
What force were they using?
They were using inertia to stop free movement of goods. Or do you think that every sit in is vioent?
Gravity is violence.
Piles of lefty shit are liars.
It's sabotage and it's violence because they're using force to stop the free movement of goods and people.
Humanity evolved belief in an afterlife where you are judged just to avoid having to kill idiots like you to get you to shut the fuck up.
And do you disapprove of all civil disobedience?
All goods and people belong to the state.
No, to be violent, you have to have violence. Quit engaging in newspeak and context collapse. It's not a good look.
You know what else is violence? Forcing experimental drugs on people. You bitches want to play hardball? Don’t cry like a cunt when the people you’re oppressing hit back.
Maybe you leftists should call it a day and give up.
There is no user fee. It's a tax that goes to the treasury just like all taxes. It has no relation to what is spent on roads. It just all goes in the same pile .
Has there ever a better time to tax rich people? Eric's claiming lowering a tax would cause higher prices. Well fuck let's raise some taxes then. The rich people make and spend most of the money so they're most responsible for the higher prices. You can't even begin to talk about higher prices without examining corporate profits. And then there's oil. You.god damn well should know OPEC is manipulating and fixing the price. That's gangster capitalism and you don't mention it when you're discussing the price of oil? Fuck. Instead you're acting like it's just the way it turned out. Gas is high because of limited supply. The supply is limited by design. And Russia is causing these prices to go up with their gangsterism. This shit is way more than the free market just wondering around bumping into shit. Wake the fuck up.
True. Poor people don't buy gas. Their Model X's use 'lectricity. Crank the gas up. Plus, if it slows down one Canadian Trucker, it'll be worth it.
The rich people make and spend most of the money so they're most responsible for the higher prices.
What a fucking dummy.
It’s just painful to read ignorant shit like that.
The real question is: how can someone who clearly knows nothing about economics get so riled up about it?
You should stick to 'whataboutrump' and anti-racism. Those both work well with your 'experimented with community college' level of education.
Way to say absolutely nothing.
No, he said something. That you know nothing.
Did you fly directly from Stupidville or did you have to change planes in Chicago?
And did you have an escort for "special" people?
You.god damn well should know OPEC is manipulating and fixing the price.
THEY'RE A FUCKING CARTEL. THAT'S WHAT CARTELS DO.
And the C in OPEC is for countries, not companies. Hardly capitalism.
Has there ever a better time to tax rich people?
Do you want Stalinism? This is how you get Stalinism.
Yes. He does.
Russia is causing these prices to go up with their gangsterism.
Track suits, do-rags, and gold chains, amiright?
isnt that gangsta ?
You do realize you're advocating for raising perhaps the most regressive tax we currently have, yes?
That’s just a silver lining for him. It pushes more people into government dependency. Which has been one of the biggest goals of the democrats since LBJ.
Wasn't a good idea when you wore it on your dress, still isn't a good idea now.
Stick to eating crayons.
He needs lots of crayons. He puts them in both ends.
So much for taxation is theft.
Taxation is the graft we can't avoid paying together.
this.
The Climate Hyperdisaster will kill us all tomorrow unless we act yesterday, so Biden wants to take action to keep us from reducing consumption of fossil fuel.
Well, Eric, the democrat party platform might suggest a third reason, directly linked to raising prices of oil, therefore gasoline.
"Climate change is a global emergency. . .
We will use federal resources and authorities across all agencies to deploy proven clean energy solutions; create millions of family-supporting and union jobs; upgrade and make resilient our energy, water, wastewater, and transportation infrastructure; and develop and manufacture next-generation technologies to address the climate crisis right here in the United States. And we will do all this with an eye to equity, access, benefits, and ownership opportunities for frontline communities—because Democrats believe we must embed environmental justice, economic justice, and climate justice at the heart of our policy and governing agenda. . .
We will take immediate action to reverse the Trump Administration’s dangerous and destructive rollbacks of critical climate and environmental protections."
"There Are Many Problems With Democrats..."
Stop right there.
There are many, many problems with Republicans as well. Most of them are Democrats. Both Sides!
Very true. There needs to be a ‘great cleansing’ that expunges all the leftists from government. Then another cleansing for news media, another for Hollywood, etc..
Remember bohem you stumped for the guy. This is on you
Here’s a question; who is the bigger shitweasel, Boehm or Sullum? Boehm has an edge with his buffoonery, but Sullum is a special kind of idiot.
Bohem is the shitweasle
Sullum is retarded
>>"I'm going to work like the devil to bring gas prices down," Biden said last week,
Bush the Younger had a button. Can Brandon not find the button?
>>Has there ever a better time to tax rich people?
lol thanks Strazele. a larf every time.
Yeah! Because the gas tax is a consumption tax, so it hits the poor and middle class the hardest! OBL, can I get an Amen!
What the actual fuck, Reason?
Because it’s a use tax.
Why should anyone pay more than any other user just because some of those other users are poorer?
^^^What he said.^^^
Contrarian alert: Last of the Real reporters (Taibbi) did an investigation into gas prices in the early aughts. Turns out that Wall Street is investing pension funds in commodity futures speculation, a law existed against that for decades. Gas prices will stay high or pensions will collapse.
States are broke. The Fed can raise rates, but they’re not going to risk the pension tethered to the blue states.
There Are Many Problems With Right-Wing Reason's Reflexive Dismissal of Any and All Democrat Proposals
There.
Are.
Bushels.
Of.
Shit.
Filling.
Stolid.
Citizen.
Fuck off and die, lefty asshole.
You swapped 'u' and 'p' for 'o' and 'l' in your handle. Your assertion is dishonest and wrong, so, congratulations on that. My guess is you found it clever, it isn't. Libertarian =! right-wing, but since you were likely furiously masturbating while typing, at least you have that, rather than an intelligent opinion. Next time, read the fucking article, and maybe respond to it. It's sort of a tradition.
We’re supposed to read the articles? I come here for the comments.
"A federal gasoline tax holiday would undermine the user fee system for funding highways and could worsen inflation."
"The system" is already undermined:
"Then- Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters stated on August 15, 2007, that about 60% of federal gas taxes are used for highway and bridge construction. The remaining 40% goes to earmarked programs, including a minority for mass transit projects. However, revenues from other taxes are also used in federal transportation programs."
Wiki, and that number has likely fallen since then.
And then:
"...The 10 states diverting the largest percentage of their gas tax money: New York diverts 37.5% of its gas tax revenue, Rhode Island diverts 37.1%, New Jersey and Michigan divert 33.9%, Maryland diverts 32.5%, Connecticut diverts 27%, Texas diverts 24%, Massachusetts diverts 23.9%, Florida diverts 13.6% and Vermont diverts 13.2%..."
https://reason.org/policy-brief/how-much-gas-tax-money-states-divert-away-from-roads/
A gas tax is simultaneously an outstanding example of government properly internalizing an externality by imposing a tax associated with your actual use of the public good, and an example of how government can never make it work in practice because it’s government and will always find a way to politicize the issue and remove it from the realm of reason.
So the Nazi-Regime thinks they control up-to 50% of the mobile energy industry? And consequently no one can see why oil is monopolized...
Here's a hint; If the USA Nazi-Regime was a corporation; how would their "revenue" compare to every other supposedly monopolizing corporation??? I other words; how much of the people's labors flow through the Gov-Gun gates?
""By boosting demand in an already over-stimulated economy, the holiday would likely boost inflation in 2023 once it ends," Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget."
This idea is invalid on many levels. The most elementary level is a confusion between DEMAND and QUANTITY DEMANDED. A lower price will increase the quantity demanded (not the demand) of gasoline (and reduce demand for other goods). See my Econlog post on the yo-yo economic model at https://www.econlib.org/archives/2018/01/a_frequent_conf.html.
They need to drop all taxes on gas and diesel till prices drop. Same for all other goods. Government created this problem now they must stand up and fix it.
Mass suicides by democrats and RINO’s would be helpful.
You might want to compress some of your images and reduce their size. If you want to compress any of your images and reduce their size, then you can do it very easily, for this you can use jpgimagecompresss.com. This blog will look at a couple of ways to make your images smaller in size, but with the same quality.
The Democrat's plan is to lower the gas tax until the mid-terms are over and then double the gas tax.
Don't be fooled.
The linkage between the federal highway fund and actually spending the money accumulated on highways was severed decades ago by light rail fetishists and bike trail fanatics.
This apparently comes from the "Libertarians for Higher Taxes" desk at Reason.
Don't you see the absurdity of your claim to be a libertarian magazine?
Lowering taxes shifts the supply curve. This will increase demand somewhat, and simultaneously lower prices somewhat.
Reasoning about this in an "either/or" way is utterly absurd. It shows a complete lack of understanding of basic economics.
Furthermore, it is impossible for lower taxes to cause inflation, and it is nearly impossible for lower taxes to cause price increases. And if you don't understand the difference between inflation and price increases, that's another thing you should read up on.
SleepyJoe is a total loser.
+++
Because it didn't happen. Domestic production is booming. The oil companies are raking it. It's flat out delusional to believe Biden crippled the industry.
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/protesters-block-interstate-35-in-duluth
I've never defended blocking traffic or riots. It's stupid and turns people against your protest.
Its a dumb cunt.
Someone blocking traffic in SOHO or anywhere in New York City would quickly be arrested. Even parking a car or truck to stop traffic would result in the vehicle being impounded, and not released unless the fines were paid.
The difference is that BLM and the rest are special and allowed to do that shit with impunity and even burn down Federal Courthouses. I thought everyone knew that. [/sarcasm off]
You're the ones defending the so called trucker protest and by extension the out of control BLM protests.
Hey, fuckstick, it is an official organizing tactic of BLM.
Reason's buddy here in Austin got Pokerized for blocking traffic.
turns people against your protest.
Apparently not.
I don't think you can blame March 2020 on Biden.
Oh, and for those who were not aware, GoFundMe has a history of being against natural rights like freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom to petition and the right to counsel.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gofundme-removes-page-supporting-army-sergeant-shot-killed-armed-black-lives-matter-protester
False Equivalence.
You don't get out very much, do you? Oddly, I haven't noticed any of the truckers burning anything down or blocking emergency services from getting to people trapped in burning buildings.
Like opening the strategic reserve to drive the cost down a nickel in December, then bragging about it. The dumb bastards believe that voters don't notice the first $3.38, but the last $.12 is what hurts.
I've managed $19930 in no more than 30 days through working job at my apartment. Just when I've lost my office position, I was so distressed but luckily I have searched this on-line task which is why I am ready to collect thousand USD from the comfort of my home.RGh Anyone can get this career and could get more money online heading following site.
Get more information............VISIT HERE
Am 'reliably,' by which I mean the exact opposite, by the left-leaning and progressive shills and commentariat, that orangemanbad was and still is entirely to blame for this. Through the power of letting the governors do their own thing, it appears. Then, denying reality has always been the left's/progressives' strong suit.
Newsom pretty much owns that.
Who is still a democrat. It’s all their fault.
Did you really expect more from Boehm? His ‘work’ is an ongoing embarrassment to Reason.
Exactly.
Or the way Biden's first official act as president was to shut down construction on a pipeline that would've delivered 800,000 barrels per day.
Come to think if it, how did this guy wrote this article without ever typing the words " Keystone XL?
That's the largest factor driving fuel prices, and Biden has complete control over that.
By killing the pipeline, Biden sent a message to energy investors; "Put your money elsewhere, or government might kill your investment so autistic Swedish teenagers won't be mad at us".
They heard, loud and clear.
Without constant investment in energy exploration, drilling and transport, supply declined.
When supply declines, prices go up.