Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Free Trade

Biden's Solar Panel Tariffs Make It Costlier To Meet Biden's Climate Goals

Nothing new under the sun as Biden decides to extend Trump's solar panel tariffs for four more years.

Eric Boehm | 2.7.2022 1:35 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
zbynek-burival-V4ZYJZJ3W4M-unsplash | Photo by Zbynek Burival on Unsplash
(Photo by Zbynek Burival on Unsplash)

The Biden administration's plans to address climate change faces a serious obstacle: the Biden administration's protectionist trade policies.

On Friday, the White House announced that it would extend Trump-era tariffs on several types of imported solar panels and solar cells. Those tariffs were set to expire later this month, but President Joe Biden has invoked his unilateral authority to extend them for another four years.

The tariff will be applied at a rate of 14.75 percent this year, with planned declines to 14.5 percent, 14.25 percent, and 14 percent in each of the next three years. Donald Trump's tariffs had been applied at 30 percent in 2018 and declined to 15 percent last year.

In addition to the lower rate, Biden's declaration of the tariff extension makes some technical changes to limit the scope of those import duties—double-sided solar cells, known as "bifacial cells," are now exempt from tariffs, for example. But the overall goal is the same as it was under Trump: to raise the price that consumers will pay for imported solar panels and their component parts.

But the Biden administration also wants Americans to consume more solar power. In fact, that's a crucial part of Biden's plan to combat climate change. The White House has said it wants solar energy to account for half of all American energy production by 2050. The administration has already taken steps to free up more federal land for solar facilities, and a major component of Biden's "Build Back Better" plan is a new tax credit for residential solar panel installations.

The only way that will happen is with imported solar panels and solar cells. The U.S. is expected to expand solar production by about 30 gigawatts this year and 32 gigawatts in 2023, according to the trade publication Solar Power World. But domestic production can only supply about 8 gigawatts' worth of solar panels annually.

The artificially higher prices created by tariffs have already hammered America's solar industry. Abigail Ross Hopper, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, estimated last year that "America lost out on 62,000 solar jobs, including a net-loss of 6,000 solar manufacturing jobs," due to the impact of tariffs. After Biden's announcement on Friday, Hopper said in a statement that she was "disappointed" about the decision to extend the tariffs, though she applauded the decision to exempt two-sided cells.

Meanwhile, the higher prices created by tariffs are passed along the supply chain. According to a study by the American Action Forum, solar panel consumers in the U.S. paid an extra $1.3 billion from 2018 to 2020 because of the added costs created by tariffs. The tariffs also likely contribute to the fact that American solar consumers pay roughly twice as much per watt of energy produced than the average consumer in the rest of the world.

Tariffs mean higher prices, and higher prices mean less consumption. This is just basic economics.

The administration wants to force consumers to pay higher prices to please domestic solar companies (which petitioned the White House to extend the tarrifs), then use tax dollars to offset the artificially higher prices with tax credits for consumers. All while patting themselves on the back for encouraging the expansion of green energy, no doubt. But even if the federal government can throw enough resources at individuals and businesses to reach the White House's ambitious solar goals, those would still be easier to achieve if the government wasn't also artificially hiking the price of imported solar panels.

No matter how economically nonsensical this tariff extension might be, the political aspect should be clear. These are no longer Trump's tariffs. By bypassing the planned expiration and authorizing his own extension, Biden now owns this policy.

It would be nice to see him take some heat for that. When Trump first levied these solar panel tariffs, the outcry from environmental groups was significant. The Environmental Defense Fund slammed the domestic producers who asked for the tariffs for prioritizing their bottom lines over the climate. "The planet could suffer, because every kilowatt of zero-carbon solar energy that isn't installed is a kilowatt that will likely be replaced by electricity generated by dirty, fossil fuel," wrote Lenae Shirley, the group's senior director of technology, innovation, and market adoption. The Sierra Club likewise condemned Trump's tariffs as "a move that could upend the U.S. solar installation industry, which depends overwhelmingly on Asian-made panels."

Neither group has made an official statement (or even a Twitter post) about Biden's decision to extend those tariffs.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why Is Stacey Abrams the Only Unmasked Person in This Photo?

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

Free TradeTariffsSolar PowerInfrastructureBiden AdministrationTrump AdministrationEnvironmentalismClimate Change
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (82)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Using solar panels makes it costlier to meet Biden's climate change goals.

    1. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

      Did you know we literally have 12 years until climate change makes the planet literally uninhabitable?

      #ILoveScience

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        No we don't, we're down to... 7 years if I'm correct.

        1. Chumby   3 years ago

          Electrons matter

          1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

            Fortified electrons.

          2. mad.casual   3 years ago

            Blackbody Ladiation Matters

        2. Cronut   3 years ago

          No wonder why Obama is so pissed his ocean front mansion in Hawaii is taking so long. The whole place will be under water before he even gets a chance to enjoy it.

      2. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

        Why wait? The Church of AGW’s worldwide congregation should avoid the horrific cataclysm and commit mass suicide. That’ll teach us conservative and libertarian luddites!

    2. Chumby   3 years ago

      A ray of hope…

      1. Cronut   3 years ago

        You radiate optimism.

      2. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

        A sunny disposition.

      3. MSimon   3 years ago

        Water vapor is a Greenhouse gas. There is no hope.

        1. Chumby   3 years ago

          Dee says she fears hydrogen dioxide.

          1. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

            And doesn’t she drink H2SO4?

    3. Set Us Up The Chipper   3 years ago

      If the Greens aren't nuclear power advocates then they are not serious about the climate.

  2. OpenBordersLiberal-tarian   3 years ago

    Indeed, tariffs are bad for Charles Koch, the billionaire who funds Reason.com. So this is one issue on which criticism of Biden is permissible.

    #InDefenseOfBillionaires

  3. Utkonos   3 years ago

    This tariff needs a sunset clause.

    1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

      As does every federal law and regulation.

  4. Commenter_XY   3 years ago

    Neither group has made an official statement (or even a Twitter post) about Biden's decision to extend those tariffs.

    What a surprise...I am truly shocked. But it was such a world-ending problem just two years ago. The caterwauling from those very same groups was considerable. Wonder what changed....

  5. Chumby   3 years ago

    Biden had to sunset cheap solar…

    1. Utkonos   3 years ago

      He beams at the prospect of raysing yet more prices!

      1. Chumby   3 years ago

        Will leave consumers PeeVed.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

          Chips on their shoulders.

      2. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

        Part of his Sunny disposition?

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      Let me throw some shade on this idea.

      1. Chumby   3 years ago

        You suggesting a panel discussion?

        1. Utkonos   3 years ago

          Enough talk! While Brandon’s economic illiteracy deserves constant exposure, the only panel we need is the kind that can tan his hide (sorry, but he really burns me up)!

          1. Chumby   3 years ago

            We can longer afford to farm this out. Maybe his senility clouds his judgement.

            1. Cronut   3 years ago

              He wasn't the brightest bulb, even before he started to sunset.

              1. Chumby   3 years ago

                Nobody would claim he is capable of a stellar performance.

                1. Utkonos   3 years ago

                  His density is easy to spot when it flares up.

                  1. Cronut   3 years ago

                    He doesn't spark a lot of confidence.

                    1. Chumby   3 years ago

                      If he switched to supporting solar water boiling systems, he would mirror what others have done.

        2. Cronut   3 years ago

          I have a battery of questions about this topic.

          1. Chumby   3 years ago

            Biden’s actions may cause us to return to the dark age.

            1. Cronut   3 years ago

              He's got his wires crossed on this issue.

              1. Chumby   3 years ago

                Solar panels are just a silly con.

                1. Utkonos   3 years ago

                  Yeah but the other renewable alternative really blows!

                  1. Chumby   3 years ago

                    It can help stem the tide.

                    1. Utkonos   3 years ago

                      Then why’s everyone just milling around?

                    2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

                      Flour power. It's corny, but it pops.

            2. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

              The dawn of a new age?

        3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

          Yes, but one with current topics.

  6. Jefferson's Ghost   3 years ago

    Does Biden realize that if something is more expensive, then folks will be inclined to utilize it less? Between CA taxing solar installations, and continuing taxes on solar panels, these idiots may succeed in killing off their "greener" future. On the other hand, since they are anti-nuclear and anti fossil-fuel, maybe they are just hoping we will cower in the dark and accept it.

    1. Cronut   3 years ago

      The obvious solution is to continue to drive up the cost of conventionally generated electricity, and then make it illegal.

      1. Utkonos   3 years ago

        That’s revolting!

        1. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

          Yes, that will probably be the ultimate solution to the democrat problem.

        2. Cronut   3 years ago

          It does turn a lot of people off.

    2. Leo Kovalensky II   3 years ago

      Biden (and most politicians) doesn't seem to understand that human behavior is human behavior regardless of the whims of politicians. His intention here is to protect the domestic industry that his climate goals also props up. The problem (as he sees) it is that the climate goals alone don't prop up the domestic, pet, rent-seeking industry because humans will buy the cheapest product as a general rule of thumb. Ie... how markets work.

      When human behavior doesn't follow the politicians' whims, the politicians pass even more restrictions or provide more protection for their pet, domestic rent-seekers. Thus Biden raises the prices of the very thing he wants you to buy, not realizing how moronic it all is.

      Short story... Biden cares more about domestic rent-seekers than he cares about the so-called existential issue of climate change. It's the same reason that the climate nuts don't care about the most logical carbon-neutral solution; nuclear power.

    3. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

      If Biden realized things then he wouldn’t be an idiot democrat with his current agenda.

    4. TJJ2000   3 years ago

      Never-mind over 50% of the actual expense is already STOLEN from the people by gov-guns.

  7. Moonrocks   3 years ago

    Biden's Solar Panel Tariffs Make It Costlier To Meet Biden's Climate Goals

    You think the Biden regime cares what costs the peasants must bear to meet their policy objectives?

    1. Moonrocks   3 years ago

      It's like the pharaoh caring about how much stone it takes to build his pyramid.

    2. Cronut   3 years ago

      The peasants should have considered all this before they decided to become peasants.

      1. Chumby   3 years ago

        So they are not peasantly surprised?

        1. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

          Not at the peasant time.

          1. Chumby   3 years ago

            Maybe they should have done some research by serfing the internet.

        2. Cronut   3 years ago

          They're serfing the web for better options.

  8. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Only a retard would vote for the evil retard Joe Biden. Dont you agree bohem?

  9. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    Stupid Trump hating Reason blaming Trump for Biden's bad economic policy.

    1. MSimon   3 years ago

      Communism still works. The way it always did.

    2. Dick Hardwood   3 years ago

      Weren’t you saying just the other day how you prefered Biden because of his free trade policies?

  10. BadLib   3 years ago

    The problem is that liberals don't understand basic economics or priorities.

    For example, we are told how critical parts of the infrastructure and BBB bills are for our prosperity and even survival. In that case, you'd think the goal would be to get as much "bang for the buck" from the necessarily limited federal funds available. Yet, Biden touts that they will "create good union jobs" - which means that by overpaying for labor, less of the "critical" projects will be accomplished. This, of course, suggest the reality -- no one in the Administration thinks the projects are critical and that they are instead primarily a desperate attempt to buy votes from union members.

    Unfortunately for Democrats, more union members are subscribing to the general advice for politicians on lobbyists:

    If you can't eat their food, drink their booze, screw their women and then vote against them you've got no business being up here.

    1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

      Government is a jobs program for idiots.

  11. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    The British Medical Journal got fact-checked by facebook.

    And yes, it's the classic "needs context".

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      Facebook described the British Medical Journal as "a news blog", I'm not making this up.

      1. Sevo   3 years ago

        Like turd; lie 'till it hurts and then lie some more.

    2. mad.casual   3 years ago

      On 3 November Howard Kaplan, a retired dentist from Israel, posted a link to a BMJ investigation article in a private Facebook group.1 The investigation reported poor clinical trial research practices occurring at Ventavia, a contract research company helping to carry out the main Pfizer covid-19 vaccine trial.2

      The article brought in record traffic to bmj.com and was widely shared on Twitter, helping it achieve the second highest “Altmetric” score of all time across all biomedical publications.3 But a week after his posting Kaplan woke up to a message from Facebook (fig 1).

      All Karens doing their best to stay abreast of the latest information and affirm the decision they made about vaccinating their infants and toddlers months ago I'm sure.

  12. Cronut   3 years ago

    Maybe some of those "Asian-made" solar companies should consider hiring Hunter as a consultant.

    1. Chumby   3 years ago

      Seoular

  13. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Seattle's new city attorney plans a controversial 'change of course' on crime

    While campaigning to become Seattle city attorney, Ann Davison promised to increase prosecution of some misdemeanor crimes. Now in office, she's working toward that goal, but one city councilmember has some reservations.

    Right, Seattle Times, because the previous 'change of course' which was essentially "don't prosecute anything... literally ANYTHING" wasn't controversial at all.

  14. MSimon   3 years ago

    Fighting climate change is hopeless. Water vapor is a greenhouse gas which is responsible for 75% of global warming.

    According to the theory.

    1. Chumby   3 years ago

      So other efforts would be just a drop in the bucket? Way to rain on the environmentalists’ parade. They will be steamed about this perhaps reaching their boiling point.

      1. Sevo   3 years ago

        He's got a million of 'em, folks!

      2. Cronut   3 years ago

        They'll be in a fog of rage. They can be dangerous when they're like that.

        1. Chumby   3 years ago

          It clouds their judgement.

    2. mpercy   3 years ago

      It's always funny to see the charts showing the greenhouse gases and their contribution. Such graphs invariably leave water vapor off the chart, because if they included it, the other gases would be essentially zero, and the charts would look like a 7' basketball player with some ants standing next to him.

    3. Don't look at me!   3 years ago

      That theory is all wet.

  15. Zombie Apocalypse   3 years ago

    If the actual purpose of "going green " were to decrease "greenhouse gasses", we wouldn't buy a single fucking thing from China.

  16. 24musicplay.com   3 years ago

    24musicplay Love solar system so much that is what im using right now

  17. Liberty Lover   3 years ago

    Biden's pockets were lined with solar panel manufacturer's money.
    Now it is payback time, solar panel manufacturers must recover their initial investment in influence buying by gouging customers and Biden must provide the way that is done.

    Biden's Solar Panel Tariffs Make It Costlier To Meet Biden's Climate Goals

  18. TJJ2000   3 years ago

    That day..... The federal Nazi-Regime got the excuse to hijack the USA and violate the people's law (The U.S. Constitution) because................................... Get this; The weather changes????

    I don't think most Americans even take enough time to realize just how stupid/duped/propagandized that they have become.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Draft Lotteries Suck for Die-Hard Fans

Jason Russell | 5.13.2025 10:00 AM

No Divorce From China

Liz Wolfe | 5.13.2025 9:30 AM

New Jersey Town Says Small Setbacks, Stray Cats Allow It To Seize Private Property

Christian Britschgi | 5.13.2025 8:00 AM

Pakistan Deports Afghans Awaiting U.S. Resettlement

Beth Bailey | 5.13.2025 7:00 AM

How Britain's Protectionist Trade Policies Created Valley Forge

Eric Boehm | From the June 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!