Biden Administration Withdraws Business Vaccine Mandate After Losing Supreme Court Case
SCOTUS rejected attempt to bypass Congress with an emergency regulation.

The Biden administration today withdrew its mandate requiring workers from large companies to get vaccinated for COVID-19 or regularly tested, following a Supreme Court loss earlier this month.
Because of the court's ruling in National Federation of Independent Businesses vs. OSHA, an emergency temporary standard (ETS) the administration put into place can no longer be enforced.
The vaccination mandate has caused controversy in part because an ETS can circumvent the traditional democratic rulemaking process and even act as a proposal for more permanent standards, bypassing Congress' lawmaking powers.
Fearing this temporary regulation may become permanent, many private businesses, Republican states, and religious groups threw dozens of lawsuits at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Now, OSHA will ask the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss cases related to their mandate.
The mandate would have applied to over 80 million employees.
OSHA still says it will continue to evaluate the vaccine rule as it monitors the course of the pandemic, but this is amounts to an empty threat. The Supreme Court's ruling was about the breadth of the mandate and whether OSHA had such power, not how the rule was implemented. Even following the normal rule-making process, a new vaccine and testing mandate would likely not make it past the courts.
From the time of OSHA's inception, the agency never required employers to make vaccination mandatory, a safety measure that would extend beyond the workplace. Moreover, OSHA typically requires employers to pay for workplace safety measures, not employees. The vaccination mandate turned this concept on its head, with workers now bearing the burden of either vaccines or testing—something the court said is not within OSHA's power.
Justice Neil Gorsuch stated in his concurring opinion that the court's decision was about who has the power to respond to the pandemic, not how it should be handled.
With the Supreme Court's decision and the mandate withdrawal, the Labor Department now states it "continues to strongly encourage the vaccination of workers against the continuing dangers posed by COVID-19 in the workplace."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Am I misremembering things?
I could have sworn there was a period of several weeks during which the top trending item on Twitter assured me Biden's approach to this was completely uncontroversial.
#LibertariansForTrustingBigTech
Those Tweets were correct. Legions of attorneys assured the nation that the OSHA rule was on solid legal footing. The problem is the Trumpista court. As soon as Biden's 6 or 8 or 10 SCOTUS nominees are confirmed it will be jabs for all.
#libertariansforcourtpacking
If we can only confirm Kamala as the next supreme court justice, the power of affirmative action will make spring come early and the gentle breeze of unicorn farts will fill the sails of progress.
>>decision was about who has the power to respond to the pandemic, not how it should be handled
ya. Brandon pawned it off to OSHA so he wouldn't be lampposted.
"Fuck Joe Biden" - SCOTUS
More likely, Ite Brandonus
(used Google Translate, I don't speak Latin)
Muie Dorel Biden
Latin is dead. Romanian is the closest modern language to Latin.
I thought it was Romansch.
Românește
What's Romani, chopped liver?
And don't forget us. - Latinx
It's "I Brandone".
Ite is the plural "to go" imperative. The singular is simply a long "I", pronounced with a long "E" sound.
Since you are addressing him, a second declension "us" name switches to an "e" (as in the famous "et tu Brute"). You could also treat it as a third declension name, without a suffix in the nominative and just say "I Brandon".
Welcome to Reason, Julian.
Don't read the comments.
You spelled "columns" wrong.
okay. that was a good one. actually laughed out loud on that
2nd that
^^ nice
Ha! Fair.
@ Julian
Welcome to Reason and grats on the internship.
Read the comments. You’ll likely never have an editor as critical as the commentariat here. It will help you build thick skin and set a high standard for what you write.
Just don't reply in the comments. That way lies madness.
Also don't fret over using the mute button, there are certain commenters who have posted child porn.
The rest are children.
Yeah baily used to respond in the comments. Until we started pointing out that most of his sources are things he's written before
Definitely read the comments, Julian.
Most people are not here for the articles.
How else will Julian get exposed to libertarianism?
It's a good question.
Like the Biden admin cares about what the courts actually said. He and his administration were clear that they would use slow moving courts to implement their policy until struck down.
Exactly right and it was even stated publicly, though not by design. Someone let the wobbly fool occupying the Oval Office know the plan and he said the quiet part out loud.
Fuck Joe Biden's handlers.
Biden Withdraws
Is this another SLOPPY PULLOUT?
-sigh- I'll pass out the spittin tabaccy.
How did you afford that when we have HAPERINFLATION?
At least the hotdogs are down 10 cents.
"...Fearing this temporary regulation may become permanent,..."
Must be a right-wing conspiracy or something to imagine that!
Didn't the ruling withdraw the mandate? Or are supreme court rulings suggestions?
My wife mentioned the order being rescinded. My first thought was that either I was unaware of the procedure when SC strikes something down or that this was bad news. If the court nullified it and they still went through the optics of removing it without comment on how bad it was, then the administration is saying they can follow or ignore the court at their own whim. Of course, this would be par for the course for Obama (is he the puppeteer or just his former minions?)
But I thought OSHA was doing this totally independently and not at the behest of the executive branch?!?!?
As the leftard Nazi's (syn; National Socialists) continue to push for more Nazism.
THANK GOD the Supreme Court is now better at upholding "The People's" law over their government (The US Constitution) and pray they may someday become completely honorable and uphold their sworn oaths and stop the Nazi-Regime take-over of the USA completely.
For you leftards; you want a Nazi-USA.. Get the 2/3rds majority and State Ratification REQUIRED BY LAW!!!! STOP CHEATING you criminalistic Gov-Gun toting Power-Mad thugs.
SNIPER(ABL)-033
https://ptc.bocsci.com/product/sniper-abl-033-cas-2222354-18-7-8787.html
SNIPER(ABL)-033, conjugating HG-7-85-01 (ABL inhibitor) to LCL161 derivative (IAP ligand) with a linker, induces the reduction of BCR-ABL protein with a DC50 of 0.3 μM[1].