Virginia Republicans Plan To Expand Gun Rights
After sweeping last November's elections, Virginia Republicans look to roll back Democratic gun laws.

Having won both a legislative majority and the governorship, Virginia Republicans are advancing legislation to roll back the gun laws adopted under former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam.
In 2020, Northam signed bills that prohibited more than one handgun purchase per person per 30-day period, established universal background checks, gave the authorities the power to seize guns from residents considered potentially dangerous, required owners to report stolen guns within 48 hours, and increased punishments for leaving a loaded gun within the reach of a child.
These bills drew objections from Second Amendment advocates. "To take a victory lap on such a controversial issue at a time when Virginians are buying firearms at a record pace to protect themselves and their families is counterintuitive," House Republican Leader Todd Gilbert declared in an official statement.
Now Virginia Republicans have prepared their own slate of bills to expand legal protections for gun owners and sellers.
Senate Bill 75 would allow Virginians to carry legally owned firearms or explosive materials within government buildings, such as the Virginia Capitol, the Capitol Square, and the surrounding government offices and agencies. Carrying in these locations is currently a misdemeanor.
Republicans also plan to eliminate the requirement that applicants for a concealed handgun permit attend a competency course in person. The bill, H.B. 292, would allow permit seekers to demonstrate competence through participation in online, video, or electronic courses administered by a state-certified or National Rifle Association–certified firearms instructor.
Under H.B. 204, the delay while purchasers undergo a criminal history record will decrease from five business days to three, a direct reversal of Ralph Northam's H.B. 2128. If a gun dealer is told by the state police that background check information will not be available in three business days, the dealer may legally complete the transaction without the information.
H.B. 23 will seek to repeal a restriction on guns in religious places of worship. Under the current law, bringing a weapon into church without "sufficient reason" is a misdemeanor.
D.J. Spiker, the National Rifle Association's Virginia director, believes that these proposals are a good sign.
"The Second Amendment isn't a Republican or Democratic issue, it's a constitutional right." he says. "And while there's a considerable amount of work to do in Virginia to secure those rights, our legislative priorities include restoring preemption and putting an end to the confusing patchwork of anti-gun ordinances we warned would pop up throughout the state."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Virginia is for GUN lovers.
Dollars making online job to work in part-time whenever you want and start making more dollars from home. Last month I have got my 3rd paycheck of $17531 have and I gave this only 2 hrs from my whole busy day. Easy to do work and easy Hi to join also. Everybody can now get this and start making real cash simply by going to this website.
==>=> JOBS NET 1
Thank you Terri Weingarten. She is the idiot imperial that allowed the rebels to steal the death star plans.
Why not just get rid of the competency requirement period?
They need to implement it for cops.
I thought the same thing. Here in the people republic of Pennsylvania there is no competency requirement.
Well then you’d have to get rid of the competency requirements for the other amendments.
Good luck getting it through the Democrat controlled VA Senate. I don't expect that to flip until it's elections in '23.
It’ll put pressure on the Dems though.
Democrats have a 2 person majority in the Senate, and I’d bet at least a couple are moderates from rural areas.
The right to keep and bear arms is a natural (and not a constitutional) right. The Second Amendment does not create the right or bestow it on anyone; it just bars government from trying to overturn, limit, or undermine a right that we all have. Our political elites unfortunately understand neither that nor the meaning of the word infringe.
Clearly you did not go to public school.
Sarcasm? I hope so, for your sake. The Bill of Rights are all negative rights and are restrictions on the government not on the people, hell the 9A even addresses this. They are rights that people are born with, not provided by the government. I suggest you actually read the federalist and anti-federalist papers to understand. If this wasn't sarcasm that is.
^this
How the fuck you gonna expand an inherent, inalienable right, Reason?
VA is simply violating people's rights slightly less.
This is an important distinction that needs to be recognized for what it is. It is not a misunderstanding or misstatement so much as a tell.
Many ostensible libertarians are not proponents of, or believers in the notion of natural rights or the principle of limited government. Among them being most of the writers here. These sorts of people think that it is government that will provide them the sorts of liberties that they envision.
As I have said before their version of liberty is obtaining their preferred outcomes via kinder gentler statism.
Natural and constitutional rights are not mutually exclusive.
The term I use for non-natural rights is "civil rights." An item from either category can be constitutionally protected, or not. The word "infringe" certainly has nothing to do with any of those distinctions.
Yes, any "right" that is dependent upon the willing participation of others - e.g. voting, is - at best - categorically described as a civil right.
More narrowly, and speaking in the terminology of the Constitution, they are privileges.
@Corey Walker....Nice job, kid. Enjoy your internship.
Cosigned
Go Corey! Go Corey!
Ha, all this because McAuliffe couldn't keep his mask up for one election.
It’s a pathetic statement about humanity.
When we’re threatened, in this case by perceived attacks on 2a, we try to expand beyond what is right.
Not only does this propagate conflict but it encourages our opponents to do the same. It’s childish, lacks foresight and counterproductive.
It’s the behaviour of people who don’t recognize and accept that there is truth, reality that we share. This is the same as not recognizing the concept of an inalienable right. It’s like arguing about something you don’t understand.
If 2a was expanded today to allow everyone to possess WMD, they would fly off the shelves at Walmart and within the week, the republic would cease to exist. Compared to todays death by a thousand cuts.
I want to say smarten up, but that too is a pipe dream.
If 2a was expanded today to allow everyone to possess WMD, they would fly off the shelves at Walmart and within the week, the republic would cease to exist.
"If I had a bomb, I'd blast all you motherfuckers off the face of the Earth in a heartbeat." - Rob Misek
You fucking piece of shit waste of skin bald faced liar. Cite required! Prove it fuckwit!
You can’t prove what you claim or refute what you deny so you try to coerce others with lies.
You’re pathetic.
Lol so triggered and whiny and butthurt
Lying obviously means nothing to a coward like you.
I think he meant please don't let those darkies have bombs.
Unlike the anonymous coward you are, I stand up for what I say and take exception to people like you lying in a feeble attempt at defamation.
Being anonymous is as cowardly as driving with a seatbelt. With sick fucks like you around, any degree of privacy is a blessing.
Are you afraid? Pussy.
You’re just a coward hiding from being recognized as who you are, a dipshit.
Your tears are among the most delicious around here. Nobody is afraid of you more than they are afraid of a sick stalker social justice Karen who begs to get the trigger pulled on them. Just that you are the impotent, whiny, defeated nazi version of it who will continue to get curb-stomped by history. There is no need to share identity info with losers like you.
Using WMD to argue against respecting 2a rights is one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in months. But then, I don’t watch cnn.
You can’t refute the logic, and you think that makes it “dumb”.
Grow up.
Dude, don't you have a shuttle driving job you should be retired from?
LOL there is no logic in equating WMD with guns you fucking dipshit LMAO how defeat can a person be 😀
If 2a was expanded today to allow everyone to possess WMD, they would fly off the shelves at Walmart and within the week, the republic would cease to exist. Compared to todays death by a thousand cuts.
I'm picturing your quick bloodletting and the loss of millions of questionably educated citizens of what the Republic has become as opposed to this continuing slow decay and want to vote for getting it over with and starting anew with citizens who understand how expensive attaining Freedom is.
The original instructions worked for about 100 years so we could start with that. Removing the two or three fulcrums used to debauch the otherwise brilliant document (General Welfare and Interstate Commerce Clauses, the 16th, 17th, and 19th Amendments specifically) might give another 50 years or so.
Walmart sells WMD? Which department, Housewares?
I believe Sam’s Club sells SAMs.
Sounds logical.
You want to destroy the nation and start over.
You’re the problem.
Slow day in Marquette.
The "Red Flag" law has got to go too.
How is it constitutional to limit your purchase of a legal product to one per month?
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Impossible to expand the 2nd Amendment as it covers guns rights completely, the only thing legislation can do is LIMIT that right.
Why did you omit the first line of the second amendment?
“ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,”
“Well regulated” implies training and certification in the safe and responsible use of firearms to protect a free state.
Eliminating that requirement represents the unjust expansion of the right to bear arms.
“Well regulated” likely doesn’t mean what a paranoid holocaust denier thinks it means.
Please explain what training and certification was required to own a gun in 1791. None? Good talk.
Firearms were dangerous in untrained undisciplined hands then as they are now.
Like a shuttle bus!
If you weren't a complete pussy, you would know that all it takes to get the hang of using a gun is a somewhat experienced gun owner telling you the basics for about 10 minutes. Trigger discipline, never aim anywhere you don't wanna shoot and so on. No defeated, holocaust-denying, nazi-Karen clowns needed who are scared because of all the evil guns around boo hooo hooo hooo little loser face 😀
"trained, certified militia" was debunked in the Federalist papers. This tired old argument didn't work then, and it doesn't now.
From federalist paper 29 regarding militia.
“to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by congress.”
This demonstrates that training and certification “prescribed by Congress” was clearly represented by the federalist papers.
Yeah, for the militia. Which are distinct from the people. I don't know if holocaust-denying losers like you read the Bill of Rights, it looks like you don't. But many amendments cover different aspects of the same topic, in parallel. The 2nd is about guns.
The people have a right to keep and bear arms. Authoritarians like you don't like that. But you are also deeply irrelevant and whiny and impotently angry and embarrassing. And that is very amusing to the rest of us.
Expand? I think you mean restore. The Dems took rights away.
Virginia is "expanding" rights in exactly the same way, and to the same extent stopping a strangler "expands" your lifespan.