Germany Shuts Down Three Perfectly Good Nuclear Power Plants
Teutonic carbon dioxide emissions and electricity prices are projected to increase as a result.

Electricity prices tripled in many European countries this winter, including in Germany, as renewable power supplies faltered and Russia seized the opportunity to boost the price of its natural gas exports. So, of course, the German government thought this was a fine time to permanently shutter three perfectly good nuclear power plants.
The closures are part of Germany's famous energy transition, widely known as the Energiewende, to a low-carbon, nuclear-free economy. Germany aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2045 chiefly by switching entirely to renewable energy generation to supply electricity to residences, factories, and transport. That goal would be much more easily achieved if the country not only kept running its carbon-free nuclear power plants, but also built more of them.
According to International Energy Agency (IEA) data, about 45 percent of Germany's electricity in 2020 was generated from solar, wind, and hydro power. Nuclear power accounted for another 11 percent, which means that more than half of Germany's electricity was generated by carbon-free sources in 2020.

Now contrast Germany's electricity generation mix with that of France:

Over 90 percent of France's electricity in 2020 was generated by carbon-free sources, of which nuclear constituted 67 percent of the total. Annual carbon dioxide emissions have been falling in both France and Germany, but in 2020 total emissions in Germany were more than double that of France and per capita emissions stood at 7.7 and 4.2 metric tons, respectively.

Greenhouse gas emission intensity measures how many grams of carbon dioxide are emitted per kilowatt-hour of electricity produced. A 2021 report from the European Environment Agency found that in 2020 that Germany emitted 311 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour compared to just 51 grams per kilowatt-hour in France. In other words, despite Germany's massive spending on renewable power, its emissions from electricity generation are still six times worse than France's with respect to adding planet-warming gases to the atmosphere.
How will Germany make up for the power lost from shutting down the three nuclear power plants? A new analysis by the admittedly pro-nuclear Environmental Progress activist group argues that the expected addition of solar and wind capacity will not be sufficient to make up for the loss of the German nuclear plants. Consequently, the group observes, "Next year, the share of German electricity generation coming from fossil fuels could be as high as 44 percent, compared to 39 percent in 2021 and 37 percent in 2020."
In contrast, French President Emmanuel Macron pledged in November that France will build more nuclear power plants. The new plants, he said, are meant "to guarantee France's energy independence, to guarantee our country's electricity supply and achieve our objectives, in particular carbon neutrality in 2050."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Like any self respecting German is going to say "Hey, let's all be more like France!"
Germans have an affinity for gas anyway.
Dummkoph.
Sheisskoph.
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ... Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ... Mᴀᴋᴇ $90 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $12000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ... Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ,go to tech tab for work detail,.......... Visit Here
You should be showered with praise for that pun.
Careful, Misek might rear it’s Nazi head.
France now gets 70+% of its electricity from Nuclear and shows no sign of reversing that.
Germany had a perfectly functioning nuclear power system and is shutting it down. It's like 1940 in reverse.
The French are smart and the Germans are dummkopfs. Welcome to the New World Disodor!!!
Germany is going in the wrong direction, burning so much coal and now dropping nuclear.
this is the result of political science replacing science...aka Climate change
How do you say :
"Hey, let's all be more like France!
In Alsatian?
These eco-frauds are evil. Don't give into their premise. They do not care about the environment or about human prosperity. They want control, power, and want to force you all to go living a dirt poor existence that nearly all of humanity suffered under until very recently.
Electric power is the ability to do work.
Political power is the derivative of the capacity to murder people en masse. You'd think Germans would have learnt the distinction by now-if only from the death camp films whey were shown during denazification.
As opposed to other humans that do not seek control and power...
The Germans are power hungry...over their people.
The Germans are smart to plug into Russia's natural gas--if they were really pulling the plug on nuclear. What's Biden's excuse for going after natural gas as a transition?
P.S. It isn't just that nuclear is a substitute for heating your house. Cheap, nuclear generated electricity is a substitute for down and dirty gasoline for our cars. What will higher electricity prices do to the transition away from fossil fuels to electric cars?
On the bright side, it really appears that many solid looking ideological movements are becoming fractured.
Both the Greens and Social Democrats are becoming divided over "renewables" and it's likely that the Christian Democrats will realize the folly of Merkel's devil's bargain with the left.
If there are still functioning Nuke plants in Germany, they are only one change of government away from being brought back online.
"If there are still functioning Nuke plants in Germany, they are only one change of government away from being brought back online."
Even if that's true, then they are only 1 more change of government away from being shut down again. No company can afford to run a high capital business with that kind of uncertainty without much better profits than the Germans are going to allow the nuclear power companies to have. The uncertainty alone dooms them in the long run under the current business model.
This has all happened before in other contexts. They instituted a carbon tax in Australia. Once the tax started showing up on the voters' energy bills, they voted the Gilliard government out on its ass, and the first thing the new government did was repeal the carbon tax.
People have a hard time believing us when we tell them about the likely consequences of the left's positions in the future. ObamaCare will raise the cost of premiums for the middle class--who knew?! Increasing the money supply faster than the rate of economic growth will fuel inflation--who knew?! Once the costs are actually implemented, people's reactions to them are swift, deep, and it leaves a lasting impression.
People respond to price signals, and voters are no exception. When the voters are freezing or paying through the nose for energy, they'll change their minds. The trick for libertarian capitalists isn't to worry about whether the voters will eventually capitulate to reality. The trick for libertarian capitalists is to persuade our fellow Americans not to go down these stupid paths in the first place.
The consequences of these policies are neither unforeseeable nor unforeseen, but people just don't want to believe it. This time it's gonna be different because Joe Biden isn't a racist and he cares about people.
The trick is to make sure they don't go down them far enough to do permanent damage, but a bit of pain might be just the vaccine needed so that the impression is lasting.
LOL @ lasting impression!
No, not really. They'll make a point of spiking them, so that bringing them back online will be prohibitively expensive.
And as JWatts says, no business can survive knowing that their extremely capital intensive plant is one election from being shut down.
its not that simple. depends on how long its shut down.
There are two unfinished nuke plants at Hanford started in the 70s...no way to finish them. Regs, old equipment replacements...
What will higher electricity prices do to the transition away from fossil fuels to electric cars?
Nothing that new taxes and subsidies can't fix.
If we're talking about the cost of people charging up their cars killing market penetration for electric cars, I don't think taxes and subsidies can fix that. The last group of people to get on board with electric cars will be the poor because they simply can't afford it. And I don't think they can artificially inflate the cost of electricity by killing natural gas AND have deep market penetration for electric vehicles with lower income people with taxes and subsidies. That would take a huge entitlement program, and I think they understand that won't work.
I think their plan is just to force people to telecommute, move closer to work, and use public transportation. And I don't believe you can force them to do that without getting yourself voted out of power. Any policies big enough to bring about the changes in consumer behavior they want are also big enough to make those consumers vote against the politicians who inflicted those policies on them. At some point, too, you start getting some Joe Manchin types, who refuse to commit political suicide on the altar of climate change.
Don't worry fusion is just ten years away. As it was in 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020...
Nuclear os starting to get glowing endorsements from environmentalists looking to curb carbon emissions.
And they should glow!
We talking superpower glow of FBI glow?
Where the hell else do we go to become Spider-men or Incredible Hulks?
Bah. Keep your radiation. Chemistry and lightning is where it's at to tap into the Speed Force. Who would be a Marvel when they could be a DC?
Bah! I would rather have the Power Cosmic, or maybe the Infinity Gauntlet.
What will higher electricity prices do to the transition away from fossil fuels to electric cars?
The real question for you Ken, is why do you care? Shutting down nuclear plants and raising the cost of electricity is just really popular, right?
Nuclear isnt cheap.
Very high regulatory and lawsuit driven costs to build a plant.
And they must be near rivers...
I’m sure Putin approves of the shutdown.
Vladimir did putin a good word for them to do this.
After a thousand years, it appears Germany is trying to destroy its own country to the benefit of Russia (whose natural gas Germany wants to be dependent upon) and France (whose nuclear power will make it the EU's largest economy, surpassing Germany).
Actually, as of this comment, the "German Nation" is about two weeks shy of being one hundred and fifty (rather than a thousand) years old.
No, the modern German state is about two weeks shy of being 150. The German nation dates to somewhere between 843 and 1000, depending on your preferred definition, which makes it over a thousand years old.
This. One of the titles of the Holy Roman Emperor was Rex Teutonicorum (King of the Germans).
My world history teacher insisted on calling Charlemagne's empire the "German Roman Empire" to ensure we kept it straight from the classical empire and the Byzantines.
Unusual, but not really a bad idea.
Calling it the "Holy Roman Empire" has probably confused more high schoolers than keeping meiosis / mitosis straight.
Besides, avoid calling it the HRE means we don't have to hear the quip "... which was neither holy, nor was it Roman"
Imagine if Burt Ward were teaching about the Roman Empire. That would be totally confusing.
two weeks shy
150 yrs. - two weeks in COVID time rounds up to 1,000 yrs. in 1872 yrs.
I stop taking anyone who claims to care about the environment seriously the moment I hear them shit talk nuclear power. If you aren't all in on clean affordable nuclear power as the best power source currently available you're not an environmentalist, you're just a luddite who wants to smash stuff.
"But the waste it like lasts forever and stuff. What do you do about the waste?"
At least that's the usual refrain I hear from anti-nukers.
You build LFTR plants instead.
Go to the Reason archives and from 1977 through 1993 you'll find articles by Petr Beckmann and Bernard Cohen on nuclear safety and electricity. Beckmann defended the LP and got me to volunteer and join. In fact, Beckmann, Arthur C. Clarke and Luis Alvarez all worked together on the problem of using radar to help land British planes in the war against National Socialist totalitarianism during WW2.
It would do so much for their credibility (admitting that nuclear power is part of the solution for “limiting greenhouse gasses”), but this is a group of people that are ultimately interested in power over people.
And the kind of people who thirst for power above all else aren’t known for ever admitting they’re wrong.
Can I be for nuclear power and want to smash stuff?
To make a chain reaction, you've gotta smash a few nuclei.
You caught it
If you’re exposed to enough gamma radiation then you can smash anything.
the head if Greenpeace was on the nuke train!
Thing is the Radicals dont want any power sources.
The Agenda 21 goal is de- industrialisation.
Fortunately Germany has some rather extensive mountainous areas so once they succeed in their quest to return us to a hunter/gatherer society, there'll be plenty of caves to live in.
Just like old times along the Neander!
Along with Friedrich 2?
Back to their barbarian roots
But no horses to eat or bearskins to tan
" The hills are alive with the sounds of wind turbines..."
Just doesnt have the right ring to it.
How Putin takes Ukraine, without a single shot being fired.
It truly makes me wonder if we should have liberated the continent.
Leave them to their fate.
We should close all US military bases in Europe, leave NATO and wish them well.
Please don't forget to drain the North Atlantic before you leave.
subtitled " How Biden lets them do it..."
Patton was right when he said "we defeated the wrong enemy."
Germany should be like the limousine liberal Al Gore environmentalist phonies by planting a few trees and declaring, "Net Zero!"
It'll be pretty funny if Germany ends up having to buy lots of electricity from France.
Electricity from evil nukes?
Never!
Germany is already buying power from France. So is Britain even after Brexit.
When it gets to that point they'll just invade again.
You don’t think the French would jump at the chance to nuke Germans?
Paying 2x myself. Thinking about Germans paying 4x gives me tingly schadenfreude.
IT'S THE RUSSIANS!!!1!
Did I do it right?
You have the Reich to remain silent.
and cold.
and powerless.
They will need a lot of Norwegian hydro power to meet their baseload demand. And all other needs when the wind is calm at night.
What we need is some cute and catchy slogans that work as well as the old "split wood, not atoms" (well, at least is worked well in Maine in the 70's). But seriously, nuclear needs to get some good PR going.
The problem is, nuclear is almost absolutely necessarily provided by high tech, big money, centrally controlled institutions. The left HATES anything involving money (except giving it to indigents), tech (unless it's being used to track conservatives) and control (unless they're the ones in control).
So, it's back to some catchy slogans. "A better pathway to a glowing future"????? hmmm..... not so good.....
"The future is newclear." Newspeak-y enough to be propaganda?
"Thine Gott is Not Mit Uns"
Said Otto,
"Is a Motto of the Huns"
Impfungen machen dich frei
When Petr Beckmann was advising Reason on energy he always pointed out that nuclear plants produce more gigawatt-years of energy per person theoretically slightly injured than any method of electrical power conversion. The costs hardly matter if you’re maimed or dead because of methods that are manifestly much more dangerous and less reliable. Beckmann’s “The Health Hazards of NOT Going Nuclear” are available from Access to Energy and Amazon. Sir Fred Hoyle, author of my college astronomy text, with his son wrote “Commonsense in Nuclear Energy” making the same points differently. Luis Alvarez of Bolide Impact Extinction Events fame also considered nuclear the safest way to get electricity in “Adventures of a Physicist”. How sad that Reason cannot now find a science writer interested in the value of human life and thriving as a standard of value worth having—a standard Germany would do well to adopt.
The new containerized nukes are the best option.
75 MW from a large quasi propane tank dealey.
Any big central plant requires transmission line infrastructure which is horrifyingly expensive.
Well, considering that econutz now also want to ban burning wood in every way, shape and form, everything from power plants to backyard fire pits, what are we supposed to do?
Burn Liberals for heat.
Progs love to shit the bed, then make the rest of us lie in it
Too bad they couldn't just grant France extraterritoriality over the nuke plants, and then continue to use the power. A good deal of their electricity already comes from French nuke plants, doesn't it?
The solution to greenhouse emissions is nuclear power. Sure there is some risk with older nuclear power plants, but there are risks with other methods.
Solar panels require highly toxic methods to manufacture and require huge amounts of space to generate inconsistent unreliable power.
Wind turbines are expensive and take large corridors to generate inconsistent unreliable power not to mention the danger to birds or the time to recoup the expense.
Nuclear power is consistent and reliable.
6 MW turbines in W IA
40 ACRES each. They must be spaced apart so the air disturbances dont cause problems for other turbines. Yes much of that is farmed in between but...
They require NG backup generators and TONS of chemicals, oils, grease, water and anti- freeze and lead- acid batteries. TRUCK loads...
Not only is there no power when the wind stops or is TOO strong, but also when their cooling systems freeze up as they do in IA.
The Ivanpah solar facility has failed. They blew past the predicted use of NG by 26%
( or at 26%, I dont recall exactly).
Alt power only works for small demand. Not consistent.
There was an article in Forbes about the nightmare that solar and wind cause for the Columbia Generating system in WA State. These intermittent sources really screw up demand management on top of the nuke and hydro there.
They must be spaced apart so the air disturbances dont cause problems for other turbines. Yes much of that is farmed in between but...
And there's mounting evidence to suggest that, despite our absolute and infallible knowledge of climate and the cap on rotational inertia windmills can withstand, we can't just plunk down wind turbines in every feasible corridor and expect the same output as if we'd just plunked down each individual farm/corridor in isolation. Line up enough whole farms close enough and you may as well have built a mountain range for the wind to blow around rather than through.
And the source of these problems, just like the source of 95% of all our problems are leftists. Keep nuke plants, get rid of leftists.
The half- truths about Alt energy...
The other half is that alt sources are not reliabke, they are intermittent and cause serious demand control problems.
Solar is only a few percent efficient. I calculated a 3KW home system at $30K
( ludicrous) and an 8 % efficiency.
95 some percent of this mythical, Unicorn - based solar power " free energy" IS WASTED AS HEAT.
.THAT CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING.
modern coal or NG fired turbines are up to
44 % efficient.
I know one thing that’s 100% efficient. Getting rid of democrats.
Whatever the best way to generate energy is will be found by the free market, not any govt. intervention. But that will require a repudiation of violence, threats, fraud, on which governments are all based. It will require mutual respect, voluntary cooperation, two civil social/economic means of interactions lacking in society.
Latest tech advances make PV + batteries the most economical. How do we overcome govt. monopolies to make this happen?