A New Study Finds That Smokers With No Plans To Quit Are Much More Likely To Stop Smoking If They Vape Every Day
The findings reinforce the case for nicotine vaping products as a harm-reducing alternative to cigarettes.

A new study of smokers who initially had no intention to quit provides striking evidence that nicotine vaping products help people give up cigarettes, reinforcing the viability of this harm reduction tool. The researchers, who reported their findings yesterday in JAMA Open Network, found that people who vaped every day were eight times as likely to quit smoking as those who did not use e-cigarettes.
"These findings are paradigm-shifting, because the data suggest that vaping may actually help people who are not actively trying to quit smoking," says study co-author Andrew Hyland, who chairs the Department of Health Behavior at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. "Most other studies focus exclusively on people who are actively trying to quit smoking, but this study suggests that we may be missing effects of e-cigarettes by not considering this group of smokers with limited intention to stop smoking—a group that is often at the highest risk for poor health outcomes from cigarette smoking."
Hyland and his colleagues analyzed data from four waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, focusing on 1,600 adults (18 or older) who initially were smoking every day, were not vaping at all, and "did not plan to ever quit cigarettes or tobacco for good." Four-fifths of these respondents smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day, while half smoked a pack or more. Overall, 6.2 percent of them had stopped smoking by the end of the five-year study period. The quit rate among respondents who became daily e-cigarette users was 28 percent, compared to 5.8 percent among respondents who did not use e-cigarettes at all.
Daily e-cigarette users were also much more likely to reduce their smoking when they did not quit altogether: At follow-up, 45.5 percent of them were no longer smoking every day, compared to 9.9 percent of respondents who never tried vaping. There was no statistically significant difference in quit or cutback rates between the latter group and smokers who vaped less frequently than every day.
After Hyland et al. adjusted for sex, race and ethnicity, age, education, household income, and cigarettes smoked per day, they found that the daily vapers were eight times as likely as nonvapers to quit and nearly 10 times as likely to stop smoking every day. Those results are especially remarkable because none of the respondents had any plans to quit during the first round of the survey.
These findings are consistent with earlier research, also based on PATH data, that found smokers who initially had no intention to quit were more likely to change their minds if they started vaping every day. But Hyland et al. note that "we did not assess whether any changes in quit intentions mediated the association between e-cigarette uptake and cigarette discontinuation." They say "future work is important to understand the causal mechanisms underlying our findings."
The researchers also note that "there may be self-selection differences between those who subsequently used e-cigarettes and those who did not." In other words, smokers who started vaping every day may have been especially inclined to quit, notwithstanding their responses in the baseline survey.
Clinical trials can avoid those interpretive difficulties by randomly assigning smokers to vaping and nonvaping groups. One such study, reported in a 2019 New England Journal of Medicine article, found that subjects who used e-cigarettes were 82 percent more likely to quit smoking than subjects who used conventional nicotine replacement products such as patches and gum. That study, unlike Hyland et al.'s, was limited to smokers who were interested in quitting.
"A growing body of evidence indicates that vaping can foster smoking cessation," although the evidence is not definitive," David J.K. Balfour and 14 other leading tobacco researchers noted in an American Journal of Public Health article last August. A 2020 meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials concluded "there is moderate-certainty evidence that [e-cigarettes] with nicotine increase quit rates compared to [e-cigarettes] without nicotine and compared to nicotine replacement therapy."
The results of population studies, Balfour et al. said, "are consistent with a near doubling of quit attempt success, found in the randomized controlled trials, and the fact that e-cigarettes are smokers' most used aid in quit attempts." They also noted that declines in U.S. cigarette sales accelerated sharply as sales of vaping products took off, which reinforces the impression that more vaping means less smoking.
For the millions of Americans who have chosen vaping as a risk-reducing alternative to smoking, studies like these simply confirm what they already know from personal experience. But it seems that no amount of evidence will persuade politicians who perceive "electronic nicotine delivery systems" (ENDS) as a grave threat to teenagers rather than a way to reduce smoking-related death and disease, potentially on a massive scale. According to Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D–Ill.), author of a bill he calls the END ENDS Act, "there's simply no evidence that vapes help [smokers] to quit."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I tried vaping and it just didn't satisfy the same way as a cigarette.
Only thing that worked for me was Chantix. That and the will to quit. Six years without a butt, woo hoo!
Congrats.
I quit in July 2020 after 45 years of smoking and only one previous serious attempt to quit. So only 15 or so months but this quit was so much easier and more motivated - and have not even had the desire for nicotine gum in a year or so. The cough is gone - the odor of smoke on everything is gone.
But you will still get the cancer.
Oh. For a bit there I thought the only thing that worked for you was Chianti.
I tried the alcohol cure - didn't work.
I tried the weed cure - made work difficult.
And Fava Beans! F-F-F-F-F-F! 😉
Six years without a butt? So it's lioposuction in a pill too? 😉
Hence the need to demonize vaping and make it expensive. That tobacco tax revenue is needed.
Same reason they demonized cures for Covid as “horse paste” .
>>tobacco tax revenue is needed
explains the sudden disappearance of my very effective hypnotherapist
Eric Garner found out how previous that tobacco tax money is to big government.
*precious
The New York Department of Revenue should have the Gollum as It's mascot on officer's patches.
The title implies that having no plans to quit smoking makes one more likely to quit than planning to quit, if one also vapes. I didn't see anything in the article to contradict that, but I'm not sure that's what was meant.
I'm afraid this is where we may be headed with vaping, at least of nicotine: that it'll be like narcotics, legally not for pleasure, only by prescription for medical use.
A New Study Finds That Smokers With No Plans To Quit Are Much More Likely To Stop Smoking If They Vape Every Day&%i>
Well death is 100 % effective at smoking sessation, and Prohibition 100% guarantees deadly adulteration if smoking or vaping are banned. So this is correct, just not for the right reasons.
If big tobacco isn't behind anti-vape hysteria then I'll eat my butt.
You do know that over the past decade, big tobacco has become a major supplier of vaping products, yes? Meanwhile, most of the anti-vape actions and messaging has been originating from the same ilk that did anti tobacco. So eat away.
"These findings are paradigm-shifting, because the data suggest that vaping may actually help people who are not actively trying to quit smoking," says study co-author Andrew Hyland, who chairs the Department of Health Behavior at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Except that Hyland and Rosswell Park falsely and repeatedly claimed that vaping didn't help smokers quit smoking (for the past 15 years), lobbied FDA to unlawfully ban the sale of all vapor products in 2009 (but not cigarettes), lobbied Erie County Council to ban vaping in all workplaces, and lobbied FDA to impose the "Deeming Rule" in 2014, which banned the sale of 99.9% of nicotine vapor products.
And of course, the US DHHS has long funded Hyland and Rosswell Park to conduct research on vapor products and vaping.
Many of those who are not interested in quitting will not now quit with vaping simply because the one aspect that made vaping attractive over tobacco is largely gone - the ability to use them in bars, restaurants and workplaces. If one is forced to vape in the same uncomfortable places that smokers have to go, then what's the advantage if health is not the question? Vaping will never be as satisfying as smoking, as hard as they try. This, I think, has been the key strategy for the anti-smoke/anti-vape crowd - I call it smoking ban 2.0 - and the vaping industry never understood that. That killed it for me.
It also doesn't help that the vaping industry has moved away from devices that look and act like cigarettes and never really solved the issue of leak-free carry or even offer a carrying case that contains the leak anymore.
https://atisang.com/shop/3269-night-marble/
https://b2n.ir/m74650
https://b2n.ir/m54371
https://b2n.ir/759577
https://atisang.com/crystal
https://b2n.ir/s19365
https://b2n.ir/r95360
https://b2n.ir/b96510
https://atisang.com/building-stone/
https://atisang.com/onyx-stone
stone
https://atisang.com/article/slab/
https://atisang.com/Granite/
slabe granite
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P295-green-marble.html
sang divar
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P292-sang-divar.html
Why in the name of compulsory behavior modification would anyone hasten to embrace an incapacity to conceive of two-pipe problems , let alone solve them .
Look what Chantix did to Obama !
The side effects I experienced were crazy vivid dreams, and flatulence. As in driving around with the windows down in winter flatulence. As in taking regular courtesy walks at work flatulence. It's was like a constant hissing noise coming from my ass. It was terrible.
But I'm a non-smoker now, so it was totally worth it.
By the way, literally everyone except you and the three stooges understand that Tulpa is impersonating me on a regular basis, and has been for years. Even when presented with proof they (and you) will never believe that it isn't all me. Heck, you still think I'm running Squirrely and a bunch of other socks.
That's what I would call raging stupidity. Emphasis on the rage.
The fart jokes were all me. The only one hallucinating is you.
Fuck you.
You and the stooges can have all the fun you want sucking each other off.
In case you do actually care (which I doubt) mute one sarcasmic and it doesn't mute all posts. That means multiple accounts. It's up to you to decided which is which.
In the past he'd put spaces in the name, so he'd be posting as ' sarcasmic', but Reason fixed that. Why they're allowing this new means of impersonation I don't know.
Anyway, I'm out of here. Any further sarcasmic comments are him.
Hi Tupla. I'm out. Have fun.
By now I've forgotten who I am supposed to be.
Lol
Black markets should have been enshrined in the constitution.
Then they wouldn't be black markets, silly. 🙂
Is that you President Biden?
A Divorced Mom With 4 Kids Lost Her Job in Pandemic, But Was Able To Stay On Top By Banking Continuously 15000 Dollars Per Week With An Online Work She Found Over The Internet .TRUMP TO WIN AND GIFT TO THE JOBS Before Elections But Unfortunately Election Fraud. It’s easy, just follow instructions on home page, read it carefully from start to finish Check The Details….. Visit Here
I have received exactly $20845 last month from this and home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online HAm by follow instruction
on the given website...........Visit Here
So that's who Tulpa is?