The FDA Still Hasn't Approved 2 New Drugs That Could Help End the Pandemic
Bureaucratic foot-dragging is costing lives.

COVID-19 deaths are up. Politicians tell us to wear masks and get vaccinated.
Amid the fear, I'm surprised that we haven't heard more about two drugs that could make COVID-19 much less of a threat.
In blind tests, Pfizer's Paxlovid was found to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death by 89 percent! It was so effective that Pfizer was advised to stop the tests.
"They halted the clinical trials!" exclaims Michael Cannon, director of health policy at the Cato Institute in my new video.
"They decided it would be unethical [not to give the drug to people in the control group]. But if it's unethical to deny them the drug, it's unethical to deny the American public that drug!"
Excellent point. Yet that's what the Food and Drug Administration is doing. They force us to wait until they're sure all drugs "meet the agency's rigorous standards."
How long might they delay?
"If the FDA is following its current practice," says Cannon, "it'll be a matter of months."
Months is an improvement over the 10 years it usually takes the FDA. During the pandemic, the FDA loosened regulations to get some medicines to people faster.
"[But] we're still losing thousands of lives unnecessarily," complains Cannon.
At the beginning of the AIDS crisis, the FDA delayed approval of many AIDS drugs. Some Americans formed "buyers clubs" to purchase AIDS drugs from Mexico. That's what the movie Dallas Buyers Club was about.
But buying unapproved drugs from other countries is illegal.
Now the United Kingdom has approved molnupiravir, Merck's coronavirus antiviral pill. In tests, it cut hospitalization by 30 percent.
But we can't try it in America. "More input is needed," says the FDA.
More input is always helpful, but our FDA is just slow.
"The United Kingdom approved molnupiravir back at the beginning of November," Cannon points out. "The FDA didn't even meet to decide whether to approve it until the end of November. In the meantime, thousands of Americans died."
While people die, President Joe Biden praises the FDA for their "hard work."
"We shouldn't be praising them for doing a job that no one should be doing, which is violating your rights," says Cannon. "If we just gave patients the freedom to purchase drugs other countries had approved, we would go a long way toward restoring your right to make your own health decisions."
FDA regulators don't want to kill people, but they do have an incentive to work slowly. If they approve a drug that hurts someone, they'll get horrible publicity. They may get fired.
But when people die from delayed approval, no bureaucrat gets in trouble. We don't know which people might have been saved.
"That's why the FDA always tries to make sure that it never lets an unsafe drug on the market," says Cannon. "Even if the cost is years of delay and many, many lives lost."
His solution: Have no FDA.
I push back. "Some people would try drugs that would kill them."
"Yes, some people would have adverse drug events," he replies. "But the number of lives that we would save would absolutely swamp the number of lives that we lose to unsafe drugs."
The FDA was created 100 years ago because some people were harmed by quack medicines. But of course, some still are.
"The entire premise of an agency like the FDA is that you're not smart enough to make these decisions for yourself," says Cannon.
But maybe we're not smart enough, I tell him. "I'm not smart enough to judge whether a pill really works or I'm being sold snake oil."
"It's not true that you're not smart enough to make this decision yourself, John," he says. "You can consult experts, your physician, medical journals, Consumer Reports. You can consult government regulatory agencies in other countries. Every day the FDA delays costs lives."
He's right.
Once a regulatory agency is created, we tend to assume that only government can do the job. But that's not true.
"The FDA needs to get out of the way," concludes Cannon. "Let patients make decisions for themselves."
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
FDA standards = what will max pharma profits and support big brother control of the proletariat.
pfuck-in-a right don't let pfizer kill the golden goose.
I've got my first check total of $15,550, pretty cool. I am so excited, this is the first time i Actually earned something. I am going to work even harder new and i can't wait for next week payment.jjm Go to home tab for more detail.......I highly recommend to everyone to apply...
Join this right now............Pays-/24
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FXh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
I wish
/Pharma employee.
Ivermectin is FDA approved.
For deworming.
That doesn’t mean a doctor or hospital can be forced by a patient to prescribe it for an off-label use.
Before someone gets all pedantic, the FDA approved it as an antiparasitic. I was being a bit facetious when I referred to it as a “dewormer”; worms are just one type of parasite it can treat.
>>was being a bit facetious
or were showing stripes lol
I got to strong arm my doctor for a cancer anti-emetic for my pregnancy.
I had to follow him around the doctor’s office telling him I needed something and he prescribed Zofran, a medicine never approved for use by pregnant women.
Huge numbers of drugs have surprising secondary uses for therapies which were never intended. I believe that the efficacy for COVID treatment is thing at best, but the way in which the media and the government put a phalanx around it told me that there was probably some merit to it.
What's interesting is Ivermectin is allowed in Japan for COVID treatment and they saw a correlated drop in cases. What's interesting is if you search for the details on that, you get GOOGLE's bullshit search results which pack the list with "debunks" and "fact checks"* saying that "no, Japan did not abandon vaccines in favor of Ivermectin" which is fascinating because I don't know anyone who claimed that.
Sure, maybe someone from Q-Anon claimed that, but no one I knew or read suggested such a thing. It was used as a treatment for people who have contracted the disease. It's being used as a treatment not a vaccine.
These so-called fact checks are becoming a laugh riot.
*now confirmed to be only opinion
thin at best*
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don't do what I want them to
- Crosseyed And Painless
You say that the government has put a “phalanx” around it, yet I can easily find NIH studies and recommendations that took Ivermectin seriously and studied it:
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
Yeah, the NIH.
Trustworthy AF.
Huge numbers of drugs have surprising secondary uses for therapies which were never intended.
LSD was originally supposed to be a migraine treatment.
IT WORKS!
Can you show us one credible reference to Ivermectin ING successfully used in Japan for anything except parasites?
Please buy a dictionary. That's not what pedantic means. Saying the actual use for a human medicine is not being pedantic. It is being truthful. God damn
You do realize that the Pfizer drug and Ivermectin share methods of action right?
That doesn’t mean a doctor or hospital can be forced by a patient to prescribe it for an off-label use.
Well, apparently it can. At least according to one court.
You don’t win the Nobel prize for horse pills.
The drug ivermectin is more than a “horse dewormer.” Its discovery for use in treating parasitic diseases in humans won a Nobel Prize.
But COVID-19 is not a parasitic disease; it’s a viral disease. There is no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans, and there are physical risks in taking it.
The Food and Drug Administration and the World Health Organization are among public health agencies that warn against taking ivermectin for COVID-19.
It is amazing how stupid you are.
In the roundup thread you claimed it was conservatives afraid of treatments and pushing misinformation. Yet here you are once again.
After a family discussion, when the potential costs of refusing to administer Ivermectin are explained to "providers", and the right incentives are detailed appropriately, I believe there would be few patients with involved families who could not get Ivermectin if they desired it.
As far as a "curative" for COVID in pill form is concerned - don't hold your breath waiting for FDA approval. Such approval would not only eliminate any justification for mandatory vaccinations, it would greatly increase the resolve of those who have so far resisted getting vaccinated. The approval process will be interminably delayed, if approval is ever granted! I've been surprised that veterinary ivermectin is still produced and available in the current environment.
There should be way more drugs available over the counter. Fk the doctor. I take what I want.
https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/breaking-january-6-committee-admits-it-doctored-text-message-between-meadows-and-jordan/
Nothing like partisan Democrats doctoring a text message from Jim Jordan to Mark Meadows in order to falsely accuse Trump, Meadows and other Republicans of creating a so-called insurrection (that increasingly appears to have been insighted by FBI agents who were once again attempting to frame Trump).
Nobody deserves to remain in office.
Good god you're delusional. Get help dude. It's not even a question of being conservative, you're just completely detached from reality.
And oh no the lie and conspiracy theory the text was based on was cut off! Contrary to the federalists hyperbole, it didn't change the substance at all.
Why hyperbole? Yes commission admitted it this afternoon dummy.
It wasn't even Jordan's text. He just forwarded it from a constitutional lawyer.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/15/dershowitz-rips-democrats-for-holding-mark-meadows-in-contempt-before-courts-rule-on-executive-privilege/
Worst sentence in the history of the world...."I claim executive privilege during the coup".
Really I'm 100% positive that's not true.
dbruce is a dbag that dbates using dbunked dbauchery.
Psays pstuff that psaki would psay.
Dbfend your stupid statement.
It's true .... I made it up .... caught one, MT-Man. Did I make this up? Ingo Pademacher of General Hospital got fired for not getting a Vax. He is going to court claiming religious exemption as in Job 12:22.
How's the lawsuit going, John? I loved the admission by Facebook during the depositions.
Not sure he’ll talk about it until it is over. Am hoping he writes an article about the whole ordeal.
No, John's too smart for that. I know he sees my comments, knows me well and is very tempted to reply, but mum's the word at Camp Stossel.
Stossel posted yesterday that he has you muted. Sorry man. :p
I remember that. Sick burn.
Stossel posted yesterday that he has you muted. Sorry man. :p
If he's still talking about me, then any press is good press.
You’ll know it is him when the phone doesn’t ring.
Reason didn't run Stossels first article on it. NRO and others did though.
How long might they delay?
Until peak vaccine is reached and their profits start to taper off.
Looks like Biden still hasn't convinced Manchin to support his disastrous BBB bill.
https://triblive.com/news/politics-election/ap-source-biden-manchin-talks-on-2t-dem-bill-going-poorly/
Manchin did not answer reporters questions about his stance in the talks.
A *wide* stance, apparently.
don't play footsie just to stall.
Come on, man! I didn't live in a Manchin in Scranton, but I went to the Sinema all the time! Only cost a haypenny back then. Went up to a nickel when talkies came around, but you got 2 newsreels and a Will Rogers feature!
/You all know this is possible...
Needs more whispers and mumbles.
*walks away without responding*
But buying unapproved drugs from other countries is illegal.
Except if you live in a free country, right?
C'mon FDA. Approve those new drugs that will end the pandemic just like the FDA approved Pfizer vaccine ended the pandemic.
I they approve it quickly then they're killing people with an experimental drug.
If they wait then they're killing people by denying access to treatment.
No matter what they're killing people.
Not true. To ensure medical privacy, they're killing file numbers in a database.
Yeah it's one of those no one's ever happy situations.
They're killing it with those confirmed covid death accounting methods.
Racking up the numbers of people who died from obesity who happened to test positive for COVID among other things. If the general public understood the difference between association and causation statistics would be meaningless in politics.
I'm all for letting people kill themselves with experimental drugs. It would all be great if no one was trying to force any of it on anyone.
But, of course, not giving is taking and letting people do something is the same as forcing them to do it.
"It would all be great if no one was trying to force any of it on anyone."
Then they should stop attempting to force their covid on everyone.
It's like demanding the right to drive drunk. 'Oh well sobriety doesn't prevent accidents!' (But it reduces them and not doing that is reckless and endangers others more than should be accepted).
If you weren't going out somewhere where you're spraying your fluids around, nobody would be forcing anything on you. Stay at home, nobody will break down your door and stab you with a needle.
I agree with your drug premise statement below in another comment, but I'm not sure that's the greatest retort people yes can choose not to drive drunk, people can't choose not to get covid vax or not. Before you retort and you touch on this above - we'll they can lower their chances through a vaccine, maybe folks with a vaccine or no vaccine should just not interact as much with people, with your argument above why not just a better stronger lockdown right because them being out at restaurant or bar doesn't trump them putting their germs, any kind of germs out their right??? Is it a predefined chance that you would set at your cause of someone else's distress that allows someone to do something? I'd like to here when and how much risk you are allowed to cause on everything in life (a list would be great) or is this just this virus with 99% survival?
Then they should stop attempting to force their covid on everyone.
That is a ridiculous characterization. First of all, no one is trying to get anyone sick. Responsible people will stay away from others as much as possible if they are sick (whether or not they are vaccinated). And furthermore, vaccinated people can give covid to people too. So unless you intend to force everyone to isolate forever, you are talking nonsense. The vaccines don't work terribly well at stopping transmission or infection. So it makes no sense to be particularly more worried about the unvaccinated. You have a very small chance of being infected by someone with no symptoms, whether or not they are vaccinated. I know several people who got sick from it in the past few months and all were vaccinated and almost certainly got it from someone who was vaccinated.
Stop pretending the vaccines work the way you (and everyone else) wish they did.
You're the one worried about it. How about you stay home?
It only works if it’s forced on everyone.
Well no, one of those is just a conspiracy theory. The other is a reality.
As the UK approval might suggest, the drug is safe. It had a large trial where it didn't kill people.
You're going to die sucking establishment class cock
Short term trials dont mean anything for a drug you expected to take regularly, hence the long history of class action lawsuits against the FDA.
I feel compelled to point out that "ending the pandemic" isn't going to happen by means of vaccines or treatments for the disease. That's not going to end anything. The pandemic ends when people finally accept that this is now an endemic virus and we have to live with it. Hopefully it also becomes less virulent and just another cold virus.
Ayuh!
JnJ USELESS.
"
Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine produced virtually no antibody protection against the omicron coronavirus variant in a laboratory experiment, underlining the new strain’s ability to get around one pillar of the body’s defenses."
NY...."get it anyway."
Psychopaths at work.
How are we this far into the pandemic and idiots are still running around having never heard of T-cell and B-cell mediated immunity. Those are less sensitive to mutations and expected to hold up better than antibodies. J&J induces that type of protection. It reduces severe disease and death, but not mild infections.
So, do the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210701150957.htm
"You can consult experts, your physician, medical journals, Consumer Reports. You can consult government regulatory agencies in other countries."
While I fully agree with the premise of this article-- you should be able to buy any drug you damn well please, come on. You know in practice medical journals might as well be written in a foreign language for the vast majority of people, and even other doctors and PhD's aren't qualified to truly judge the quality of research outside their own specialties.
Then the bigger problem is the "experts" people will be consulting will be whoever agrees with the conclusion they want, which is usually dictated to them by the media. See ivermectin as a case study. People refuse to even consider studies other than ones that have been ripped to shreds for everything from poor methodology and useless sample sizes to outright fraud, leaving them falsely believing there's evidence of efficacy when large, well done studies prove otherwise. They ignore every legitimate expert and instead follow fringe grifters who say the insane shit conservative media has programmed them to follow (while projecting bright than the sun by calling everyone else sheep). Like Dr. Demon Sperm, spokesperson for pro-fake science 'America's Frontline Physicians' who also believes gynecological problems are rooted in sperm deposited by demons who rape you in your dreams. And they doctor shop until they find some quack willing to act unethically and prescribe it rather than listen to their own.
That's the kind of stupidity we're dealing with. A lot of people are complete and utter morons who can't even handle OTC meds. But in the end, unqualified, uninformed, and stupid doesn't mean they should be able to order whatever drug they want from a shop (not compel doctors to prescribe it).
Then it opens a market for someone to translate the information for those who you think aren’t capable of making decisions.
Wait are the jack asses at Cato now claiming to be libritarian? They were all about big Gov when trump was trying to limit regulation, and not nationalize industries. They were also in favor of the double standard of trump not being allowed to rescind illegal executive orders
The pandemic is a political creation, and will end when politicians think it will help their election chances to end it.
Medically, it was over a few months back. Still just another flu strain.
Exactly.
They shouldn't approve molnupiravir. Some of the potential side effects is damage to the nucleic acids in your DNA, cause cancer and fast tumor growth, and cause birth defects.
"Against other coronaviruses, like MERS-CoV and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), the drug was found to create up to more than a hundred mutations at every section of the viral genome. Against SARS-CoV-2, molnupiravir’s manufacturers Merck and Ridgeback say that the drug’s antiviral effects are powerfully effective, limiting the virus’ ability to proliferate unchecked and cutting the risk of hospitalization and death by half among those infected. The trouble with the drug, however, is that its mutagenic powers may also create havoc among other enzymes in the body, including the nucleic acids in our own healthy DNA.
As far back as 1980, researchers have been trying to understand just how damaging NHC, molnupiravir’s metabolite, can be to our own healthy cells. Earlier this year, a study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases found that the metabolite could indeed be incorporated into and mutate within our host DNA. As others have pointed out, just because something is mutagenic doesn’t mean it’s entirely bad — even sunlight is mutagenic. But, just like sunlight, overexposure can lead to long term ill effects, like cancer. In the case of molnupiravir, the drug may not just lead to the growth of cancerous tumours but also, potentially, to birth defects, either through sperm precursor cells or in pregnant women."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2021/11/02/harming-those-who-receive-it-the-dangers-of-molnupiravir-part-2/?sh=3da4632a1490
As Fucci and the rest of these Evil pricks go back to the AZT well. Hell it worked great for these bastards the first time around. 23-million dead from AIDS. They even used poor Kary Mullis PCR test for that HIV con job. So as Fucci and the pharmaceutical boys could blame HIV for AIDS. Ask someone who has been "diagnosed" with AIDS today... If they're going to take that death pill called AZT? These Evil bastards r literally doing the Spanish Flu 2. Why don't u f-ing idiots do a little studying on WHO died during that forced out fiasco. Hint... It wasn't the UNvaccinated.
The Phucko Knows
FDA approval is meaningless. The agency has no integrity. If they had any integrity whatsoever they would not give into political pressure so easily to approve highly experimental and controversial mRNA vaccine technology that has yet to be proven safe or effective over the long term. They knew approval would accelerate mandates, so they gave in. The FDA is now a rogue agency that has no legitimacy or credibility. Perhaps they allways were, but now more than ever.
To elaborate, mandating or coercion to take experimental vaccines is in direct violation of medical ethics and the Nuremburg Code, but they are doing it anyway. The FDA is criminally negligent by playing into this by approving drugs that are still effectively experimental in nature and unproven knowing full well that approval will lead to illegal mandates.
You realize mRNA started in the 1990s, right???
I do agree about the FDA, other than the "now" part. FDA was originally formed to be nothing but corporate protectionism.
Seems kind of crazy that the FDA will emergency approve the MNRA vaccines but they can't bring themselves to approve at home COVID tests, even though the home tests are in common use throughout the world and there are even companies in the US making them for export. If you can approve a novel vaccine because of the emergency, why can't you approve a frickin test under the same guise?. YCMTSU.
What a fucking pussy
https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1471111446327083014?t=DzBT3za1R9SVm108u6_3Cw&s=19
I really do think that basically everyone is going to get covid eventually—and when you get it, you're either going to be vaccinated or you're going to wish you were vaccinated.
I mean, get a vaccine and that will help. You think the same idiots not taking a vaccine will now take a different pill?
I guess if you told them you put horse paste in it they might.
Remember when the people passed that Amendment that gave the federal government the authority to administer/regulate drugs?
Yeah; me neither...
F'en Nazi's.
The article completely neglected the FDA's original mandate (and reason for creation 100 years ago): Accuracy in labeling. That original mission was very useful and minimally intrusive, and it's still a reason for the FDA to exist.
It's the 1960+ mission creep into mother-may-I delays in manufacturing and distribution that are the problem. So instead of annihilating the FDA (which would be a small improvement), we should cut it down to its original vision and mission of information assurance.
It could even continue testing for safety and efficacy; it just shouldn't hold up production in the meantime. It should only gather that data and put it on the label, even if the label says "experimental" and "unproven".