Here's Why a Federal Paid Leave Program Would Be a Bad Deal for Many Workers
Studies show that support for mandated paid leave drops when employees find out what it costs them in take-home pay.

The nonsensical coverage of the debate over paid leave continues. Apparently, opposing a federal paid leave program is the equivalent of being anti-family or pro-suffering, or so we're told. We rarely get information about the full consequences of such a policy.
What kinds of employment leave options do workers use the most? Who exactly doesn't have paid leave currently? Are there legitimate reasons for an employer not to provide it? Or, would a government program target only those workers who do not currently have employer-provided paid leave? These are some of the questions that are rarely asked by those who insist that our government impose a sweeping new program.
Let me try. On average, 15 percent of workers will take paid family or medical leave annually. As the Heritage Foundation's Rachel Greszler noted in congressional testimony, "Surveys show that virtually all workers who have a need for leave take it, and nearly three out of every four who take leave receive full or partial pay."
Considering the media's general coverage of the issue, I wouldn't blame you for not knowing this fact.
In recent years, most of the attention has gone to parental leave. However, you might not know that this is only one of four different types of leave options available to workers. While parental leave is the easiest to plan for, as Greszler notes, "more than half of all leaves are taken by workers based on their own medical needs, with the remaining quarter taken by workers to care for family members. Many of those leaves can be unpredictable and require varying lengths of leave."
Of course, not all workers have access to paid leave. But that's unsurprising. Paid leave benefits aren't free, no matter who formally provides them. When employers provide this benefit, employees receive less take-home pay than they otherwise would. Some folks may prefer to have paid leave in their benefits, but many don't. Meanwhile, a federal program wouldn't be free either, as it would be paid for with a payroll tax.
Studies show that support for mandated paid leave drops when employees, including many lower-paid workers, find out what it costs them in take-home pay.
Further, while it's expensive, a federal program won't actually help many workers who currently do not have access to paid leave. That's because most of them are self-employed, are employed by very small companies, or are in temporary and part-time jobs. For instance, state-level data show that only a small share of lower-income workers tends to use state paid leave programs. Even if a person is eligible, the costs (both from payroll tax and administration) are too high for the benefits, especially if the program provides less than 100 percent of the wages and takes a few weeks to provide a payment.
The issue is different for self-employed workers. There are about 25.7 million small firms with no employees (sole proprietorships), and more than 9.4 million independent workers, most of whom are sole proprietors. While these workers could sign up for disability insurance to get paid leave benefits, many of them don't. The insurance is an up-front cost for a benefit they may never use.
If state paid leave plans are any indication, having a federal program won't change much. In New York, for instance, independent contractors must opt into the state program and start paying in within the first 26 weeks of starting their business. If they don't, they will need to pay in for two years before accessing benefits. Other states have fewer requirements, but the cost is generally not worth the benefit.
The bottom line is that most workers already have paid leave, and their benefits are often much better and more flexible than those provided by government. Unfortunately, a federal paid leave program wouldn't help most low-skilled workers. And for independent contractors, their costs would go up significantly for a limited benefit.
COPYRIGHT 2021 CREATORS.COM
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hi) My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old) Beginning SEX model 18+) Please rate my photos at - https://xurl.es/id378955
I am making a good salary from home $1200-$2500/week , which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible ADt economy. I thank God oy every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to and pay it forward and share it with And Everyone, Here For MORE INFO PLEASE Just check this SITE....... Visit Here
Here's Why a 40 Hour Work Week Would Be a Bad Deal for Many Workers
Here's Why Paid Time Off Would Be a Bad Deal for Many Workers
Here's Why Job Site Safety Procedures Would Be a Bad Deal for Many Workers
Here's Why Child Labor Laws Would Be a Bad Deal for Many Workers
Here's Why a Federal Ban On Chinese Slave Labor Would Be a Bad Deal for Many Workers
That's one heck of a straw man. How much did you pay for the overalls?
It's good to see you still don't know what "strawman" means you drunken stupid piece of shit.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i've had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me... They offer jobs for which sdo people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500... Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet...Read all about it here... Visit Here
Start earning today from $600 to $754 easily by working online from home. Last month i have generate and received $19663 from this job by giving this only maximum 2 hours a day of my life. Easiest job in the world and earning from this job are just awesome.SZa Everybody can now get this job and start earning cash online right now by just follow instructions click on this site...
For more info here...........Earn-Opportunities
Let the employer decide.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18k to $21k. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online.QDf I have received $26K in this month by just working online from home in my part time. Every person easily do this job by
just visit.............BizProfit
I had a guy working for me who wanted leave to hike the Pacific Trail, which takes around six months. He had just come off a three week leave which was covered by overtime, much of it forced.
One of the problems with leave is that, if the job is important and must be covered - hospital nurse or orderly, plant operator, garbageman - someone has to do it, often whether they want to or not. Sure, they get overtime pay, but as one told me "My wife is trying to get pregnant and I want to be there when it happens."
If someone is on a long leave, as suggested by the law, their job must remain open for when they return.
I refused the hiking leave, and he quit. On his return, he applied for his old job, but didn't get it.
Millennial?
Find USA Online Jobs (800$-95000$ Weekly) safe and secure! Easy Acces To Information.QAz Simple in use. All the Answers. Multiple sources combined. Fast and trusted. Discover us now! Easy & Fast, 99% Match. ..
GOOD LUCK......VISIT HERE
You told him if he wanted to take a hike, he needed to take a hike.
Exactly, it's rough on my employees who end up covering they get no special bonus. almost like federal leave should also come with federal people who now do extra work support bonus (I kid a bit). The employees doing the work may also be a bit resentful of those who over use or not judicially which we know would never be taken advantage of.
"When employers provide this benefit, employees receive less take-home pay than they otherwise would. Some folks may prefer to have paid leave in their benefits, but many don't. Meanwhile, a federal program wouldn't be free either, as it would be paid for with a payroll tax."
This is a lot like when progressives assumed that if ObamaCare required employers to provide benefits to people who worked 40 hours a week, they wouldn't just slash their workers hours to less than 24 hours a week--and make them part time.
In physics they talk about conservation of energy. Costs are like that--they can't be destroyed. They can only be transferred into one form or another. TANSTAAFL isn't a meme. It's a law of the universe. The progressives say they've invented a new perpetual motion machine. I understand the U.S. patent office doesn't even bother investigating applications for those anymore--because it's a waste of time and resources.
Shorter Ken: Progressives are evil!
You are a sad sad idiot.
Proposed constitutional amendment:
"No corporation, company, business, or any other entity shall compensate workers with anything other than money. Nothing may be deducted from pay other than local, state, or federal taxes."
Let individuals determine what benefits they want, and purchase those benefits from outside sources.
Instead of an ammendment saying things that can't be deducted from income tax, how about we repeal the income tax?
Always look for laws to get rid of first
Sorry no. PTO and sick leave needs to be available to all. As we have see with COVID people came in to work sick and infected others because they had not sick leave, and employees got burned out because they got no vacation. I reject the argument that it is bad because of the possibility that business might reduce wages. This law also needs to cover all employees, even part time ones.
Then start a company and offer that to your employees
I did.
It Worked fine.
I Retired.
what about the ones covering for the people gone? You reject them too?
I reject the argument that it is bad because of the possibility that business might reduce wages.
Do you also reject basic math? Most businesses run on razor-thin margins. Unless costs go down or profits go up, total compensation will remain the same. Paid time off is compensation. If that gets added in, then something else must come out. Like a chunk of the hourly wage.
You can reject math all day long, but that doesn't mean 2 + 2 = 5 just because you find 4 to be offensive.
How do you propose to offer PTO and sick leave to the self-employed?
Or did you not even bother to read the part of the article that explained that pretty much everyone else already has those benefits?
Spoken like someone who's never run a business.
How about unpaid leave for Federal workers? How many can we extend that benefit to, and for how long?
To quote the great philosopher Dale gribble
"what would you do with infinite free time and no income?"
I don't need paid leave necessarily, but I would like a free pony. Judging from the shocking lack of free ponies on offer, I would have to say this is an obvious market failure that the government needs to step in and address. I mean, I'm as in favor of the free market as the next guy, but when the market cannot or will not deliver what people want - such as free ponies, nickel beer, or non-fattening chocolate cake - there's a place for government to offer these things at low or no cost.
Don't forget the free vet care, and feed.
And a giant shovel.
Here's why another 'federal' workers program would be a bad idea...
IT'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Therefore an act of treason against the USA and a violations of "The People's" law over their government.....
Get the 2/3rds Congress and State Ratification or be considered treasonous to the USA... F'en Nazis'.
If you are willing to pay for it, it's free.