That Time Mikhail Gorbachev Appeared in a Pizza Hut Commercial
There may not be a more striking metaphor for capitalism's victory over the Soviet Union than a 60-second Pizza Hut ad that originally aired more than 20 years ago.

There may not be a more striking metaphor for capitalism's victory over the Soviet Union than a 60-second Pizza Hut ad that originally aired more than 20 years ago but continues to get passed around the internet as a fascinating tidbit of 1990s political commentary.
The ad, filmed in November 1997, features former (and final) Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev visiting a Pizza Hut ostensibly located in the middle of Moscow. Gorbachev does not speak a single line of dialogue in the ad—nor does he take a bite of pizza, as he reportedly agreed to do the spot with the condition that he would not have to eat on-camera—but he is undeniably the star, as other patrons in the restaurant notice their fallen comrade and debate his significance to Russia, freedom, and pizza.
It's not hard to see the ad as a notable bit of now-quaint 1990s commentary on the supposed "end of history" and American hegemony—and perhaps an overly optimistic view of how Russia would evolve in the post-Soviet era. If nothing else, it says, capitalism provides cheap pizza for the masses—and that's far more than communism could ever do.
But there are layers of meaning that extend well beyond the obvious political commentary. Gorbachev agreed to appear in Pizza Hut's ad, according to The New York Times, because he was hard-up for cash six years after stepping down as the leader of a global superpower. He was paid an undisclosed amount that was rumored to be near $1 million, according to the Times' contemporaneous report.
"I thought that it is a people's matter—food," he told the paper.
According to University of Massachusetts political science professor Paul Musgrave's detailed recap of how the ad came to be, filming took place on Thanksgiving—fitting, since the holiday is a quintessentially American celebration of food and the surpluses made possible by capitalism. Musgrave calls the final product "a beautiful short film and a very weird advertisement."
It is definitely both of those things, but the most interesting and significant part of the ad has little to do with Gorbachev or pizza. During the Soviet era, Russians were not likely to gather over a warm meal and freely discuss politics. As Reason's Liz Wolfe details in the December issue of the magazine, much of the social structure of Soviet life was designed to prevent exactly that sort of thing: "Prior to the revolution, families could speak their minds comfortably while preparing and sharing a meal. But Stalin felt privacy created far too much space for dissent to take root and multiply. His solution was to abolish familial intimacy as much as possible. In his new kommunalkas, you would never be far from the watchful eye of a compatriot who might snitch."
Even after Gorbachev liberalized parts of the economy, restaurant culture took a long time to bounce back from how it had atrophied under restrictive Soviet rule. Yes, the demise of the Soviet system allowed Russians to finally enjoy Pizza Hut, but also everything else that comes with enjoying a nice meal prepared in a restaurant.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If anyone wants to make an adult diaper ad I just happen to know the perfect (big) guy for the job. He's modest enough so he'll take the job for just... 10 percent I think. They should call the product... let's see... perhaps Brand-On?
If you are asking how this this will play out? Depends.
It’s getting difficult to absorb all this .
It's the Security and Confidence we can trust.
Not the kind of trickle down we were hoping for.
In Continence We Trust
Since the previous reports, had there been any movement?
Joe is carrying a heavy load.
Hi) I'm Paula, I'm 24) I work as a model 18+) Please rate my erotic photos - https://xurl.es/id378955
So do y8u have an adult diaper fetish and cater to hair-sn8ffers ? If so, we have just your man...
Start earning today from $600 to $754 easily by working online from home. Last month i have generate and received $19663 from this job by giving this only maximum 2 hours a day of my life. Easiest job in the world and earning from this job are just awesome.XEh Everybody can now get this job and start earning cash online....
For more details.......... Visit Here
It is part of a smear campaign.
But there are layers of meaning that extend well beyond the obvious political commentary.
It looks like Eric Boehm has you as a muse....Whether the layers are pizza toppings or absorbent material, though, you'd have to ask him.
It's OK Joe. You can go. Just let it go Joe.
Hands up for Chuck...
If you were Searching for a supplemental source of income? This is the easiest way I have found to earn $5000+ per week over the internet. Work for a few hours per week in your free time and get paid on a regular basis.AVr Only reliable internet connection and computer needed to get started…
Start today...........Earn-Opportunities
So, Donald Trump?
Sad.
Totally broken.
Delightful Mike Laursen tears.
Does this guy even understand what 10 percent means? Or is he an adult version of the baby on the Empire Today commercial?
https://youtu.be/3ADBYcJqU2Y
Saule Omarova would like to have a word with you about who won the Cold War.
While the WaPo blames Republicans for pouncing on the fact that she was born in the USSR and red-baiting her for that, not the fact that she proposed eliminating private bank accounts and controlling everyone's money at the Fed, in a "thought experiment" paper she presented decades ago while a student in the Soviet Union. No wait, the paper was from 2020. But she was just exploring some novel ideas in advanced finance.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/11/21/sen-john-neely-kennedy-goes-full-joe-mccarthy-questioning-biden-nominee-born-ussr/
And Politifact settled the matter by calling the assertion "Mostly False":
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/19/blog-posting/biden-nominee-explores-idea-eliminating-private-ac/
It was just a published paper from an academic, not something to worry about if she is put in charge of the currency.
Politifact loves that "Mostly False" designation. It permits them to lie with impunity.
"Adolph Hitler is accused of killing the Jews. This is obviously an exaggeration as millions of Jews still exist. Furthermore there is no evidence that Mr. Hitler ever personally killed a Jew. Following the German government hierarchy, he may have been ultimately responsible for the actions of some functionaries, but apportioning blame in this manner is an academic exercise.
As the statement contains an element of truth but ignores critical facts that would give a different impression, we rate it Mostly False."
Some people did some things.
Shhhhh! Don't give Misek any ideas for sterilizing his poison.
Imagine calling someone a communist, just because they want the state to take over the banking sector.
She doesn't view the attacks as red-baiting, however.
She blames racism and misogyny:
Omarova has attracted unusually personal criticism. At the hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) brought up her childhood in the former Soviet Union, and Republicans cited an academic paper she recently wrote proposing a reinvention of the U.S. financial system, which The Wall Street Journal's conservative editorial board argues is proof she hasn't "repudiated her Soviet-era views."
Omarova, who came to the U.S. as a university student, and is now a U.S. citizen, strongly denies she holds communist views. She accused her critics of singling her out because she is a woman and a minority.
https://www.npr.org/2021/11/18/1056252505/saule-omarova-occ-treasury-nomination-confirmation-hearing-criticism
Who had November 18th in the “Criticizing communism is racist” poll?
If Gorby didn’t eat, how did he get pizza sauce on his head??
They were russian to get the ad made and were not careful. They were behind schedule because they previously had been stalin. They should have putin more care. But nobody seemed tsarry about it.
The make-up man should have Trotsky-ed on out and wiped his head of any Marx with a Lenin cloth.
Andy Warhol ate a hamburger long before Gorbachev didn't eat a pizza.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUd4L1oSXoE
And amazingly, those two people have nothing in common.
Icons of earlier eras perhaps?
To eat or not to eat, that is the question. They both have slavic roots. They're probably distantly related, if that's any good to you.
"Yes, the demise of the Soviet system allowed Russians to finally enjoy Pizza Hut, but also everything else that comes with enjoying a nice meal prepared in a restaurant."
One of these things is not like the other.
“Our corrupt and unsustainable society, economy, and government were consigned to the ash heap of history, and all we get is this nasty-ass mess that passes for pizza?”
To be fair, it isn’t like they had a lot of Neapolitans living there making amazing pizza at one-off restaurants where Pizza Hut came in just for the convenience. I will go on record that Pizza Hit is more desirable to borscht or starvation.
Napoli pizza is all well and good, but Sicilian American midwestern pizza is where it's at. Them wop dagos in Kenosha make the finest pizza in all the land.
Margherita is better than deep dish, New York or chain, but it isn't the be all end all.
Diminutive and pants-crapping Biden prefers Little Squeezars.
No one out-pizzas the Hut. Except Dominos, which sells more (and better) pizza.
I somewhat agree. Pizza Hut's Garlic Bread with Mozerella is super good, but for fast-food pizza, I liked Pizza Inn best, especially their buffet with the dessert pizzas flavored with cinnamon icing, blueberry, or strawberry. It was a real treat when I was a kid.
Now for big, thick, garlicky cake-sized slices of pizza with thick toppings and gooey Mozzerella that would leave you with days of hair-of-the-dog leftovers, I loved Godfather's Pizza! It's a shame they aren't around anymore in my area!
Godfather's Pizza Combo It's Outrageous!--Vintage Godfather's Pizza Commercial
https://youtu.be/u-q816FTIWc
https://twitter.com/EricMMatheny/status/1464234661199155204?t=CGzqLlIBZWITXB0jjQkiWw&s=19
The Fake News dedicated more time to a Border Patrol agent riding a horse than Darrell Brooks driving a car.
Who's Darrel Brooks? I heard a red SUV killed those people in a tragic accident.
Five days later, woke left wing media propagandists at NYT, WaPo, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, AP and even WSJ & Fox News, still haven't acknowledged that Darrell Brooks is a black racist who hated police and whites or that his actions were domestic terrorism.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/gwendolynsims/2021/11/25/hey-mainstream-media-call-it-what-it-is-its-the-waukeshamassacre-n1536343?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=onsite&utm_campaign=582
While it took just several minutes for the left wing media propagandists to falsely accuse (with zero evidence) Kyle Rittenhouse of being a white supremacist murderer, they still refuse to acknowledge (despite dozens of social media postings) that Darrell Brooks was a black racist who hated police, whites and Jews, or even that he intentionally ran into dozens white people with his SUV (as all objective observers quickly realized).
https://townhall.com/columnists/timgraham/2021/11/26/the-politics-of-weaponized-car-attacks-n2599668
WaPo misleads public about Darrell Brooks
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/rebeccadowns/2021/11/25/wapo-taking-heat-for-tweet-about-waukesha-that-leaves-out-key-detail-n2599686
Why would WaPo investigate? There is no clear link to white supremacist domestic terrorism.
The lying left wing race baiters who promoted and defended BLM violence denounce Rittenhouse acquittal as promoting vigilanteism
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/11/25/national-urban-league-ceo-morial-rittenhouse-jury-seemed-to-sanction-vigilanteism/
Politically split families had a great opportunity for shouting matches during yesterday’s Thanksgiving feast.
Maybe, but you couldn’t understand them or tell who they were with the masks on.
Like Biden without a mask.
They don't want to blame lax bail and prosecution policies for allowing a dangerous felon the opportunity to commit more vehicular assaults, they want to blame the SUV for being so dangerous.
Decades ago, a white SUV kidnapped African-American sports and entertainment legend OJ Simpson and attempted to take him across the US-Mexican border. And that same SUV was probably present when OJ’s ex-wife and that waiter were murdered.
Did he ever find the real killers?
And is OJ still not a Jew, as Adam Sandler observed?
Funniest part of undercover brother was when Eddie Griffen is talking to "conspiracy brother" kchappell) about all of the White / black conspiracies, and says so oj really didn't do it!
Chappell winces an stats hemming and hawking going weeelllllllll....
Jeff assures us nothing is known about this Brooks fella and we shouldn't rush to judgement. Not even joking.
chemjeff radical individualist
November.25.2021 at 10:26 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
Perhaps we might do a side-by-side coverage of Charlottesville. (from OP)
Why do you think they should be comparable?
On the one hand, you have an event organized by obvious bigots saying obviously bigoted things, causing trouble, and murdering a counter-protestor. And on the other hand, you have what happened in Waukesha, in which the motivations are far from clear. Do you want the media to be jumping to conclusions?
My wife has Fox news on all day. I've yet to hear a mention of Brooks outside of whining about bail reform. In the last couple of days I've heard zero. Maybe it's the holiday. If Tucker doesn't go there next week we'll know it's a universally accepted third rail. Right down the memory hole.
24 years later, Pizza Hut has totally gone to shit.
There's a new Covid-19 variant making the rounds.
"Lockdowns, vaccine requirements and travel restrictions have swept Europe amid rising Covid infections and concerns over a variant first detected in South Africa, highlighting new challenges ahead for the U.S. as officials want to avoid more shutdowns.
While scientists say they are still figuring out the exact effects of the more than 50 mutations they have identified in the new variant, it has been driving a sharp rise in infections in South Africa over the past two weeks, albeit from very low levels."
https://www.wsj.com/articles/southern-africas-new-covid-19-variant-prompts-wave-of-travel-restrictions-11637920491?
The new variant has apparently been detected in Belgium, Hong Kong, Israel, and South Africa. This is, of course, really bad news. And, for all we know, it may be behind the surge in cases we've seen Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands, which made authorities there reintroduce lockdowns--and led to recent riots.
I'm not saying we should expect another wave of lockdowns here in the U.S., but we should probably start talking about it now if we want to avoid them. From a political perspective, the Democrats are so unpopular, they have little to lose by backing lockdowns, and it may help them quite a lot--to divide Americans again this way.
The time to think about whether to buy fire insurance isn't after the kitchen is in flames, and the time to oppose lockdowns isn't sometime after they've been implemented.
The DJIA is down 950 points.
Now down 1,100.
But what about the price of chewin’ tabacky?
Fortunately, the price of the benchmark spittin’ tobaccy has stabilized at only a 10¢ per pouch increase.
Its haperinflation! 🙂
If there were a bright side to this, it might be that it means the end of Biden's socialist BBB budget reconciliation bill. On the down side, if they stuff the worst of those provisions into another Covid-19 stimulus bill, moderate Democrats might have a harder time voting against them.
They’ll just slap a new name on it, and boost the spending by another 25% .
Boost Back Better
"The patient is not responding."
"Increase the voltage, and try again."
Unvaccinated? Give no therapy and put “Died from covid” on the death certificate.
Vaccinated? Blame the death on hospitals being swamped by unvaccinated.
Boost is how Biden gets his nutrition. The pudding is just the "Spoonful of Sugar" that "helps the medicine go down."
https://youtu.be/Shk0JoGcZ60
Moar Eviction Moratoriums!
Nobody needs 26 variants.
While rate of new covid cases in the US has increased 100%.
Compared to the 255 new weekly cases per million of Americans,
Slovakia now has 2,040 cases, Chechia has 1,570 cases, Austria has 1,540 cases, Belgium has 1,450 cases, Lichtenstein has 1,440 cases, Slovenia has 1,350 cases, Netherlands has 1,300 cases, and another 11 European countries have >500 new weekly cases per million.
The EU now has 550 new cases weekly per million, more than double the rate in the US.
Above, I mistakenly posted that the US rate of new covid cases increased 100%. In fact it only increased by 25% in the past month.
Your math is still better than Fauci's.
Are we back on cases, and not deaths for some reason?
We will soon be back on available ICU beds. Don’t look at the data regrading how fewer we have post-mandates.
And struggling hospitals because they canned the unvaccinated staff.
I've read about 5 different articles on this. Not one comment on increased deaths from the variant, just the fact it may avoid shitty vaccines. They don't even care about the death rate, just infection rates.
But just to be safe, Biden will cancel Christmas.
Obviously he didn't mandate hard enough.
I'm more afraid of the government response to the virus.
Screw it, I'm in Florida.
Go nuts with the lockdowns in your shithole states.
We talked about the Pizza Hit ad some articles ago. Methinks Reason is taking article ideas from teh commentariat.
Do you have a cite for that? I highly doubt the amazing staff at Reason need to get any ideas from degenerate Trumpistas.
Lol
When I was in high school back in the early 80’s, I remember that I saw an image in one of my textbooks taken in one of the nations in the Soviet orbit - a billboard, done in that Soviet style of propaganda art, of Marx and Lenin - with a very large billboard right next to it, advertising Pepsi.
I concluded from that image, that Communism was doomed.
The Choice of a New Generation
If you are a fan of socialism, don't be sad when it fails. There will always be a group of people dumb enough to give it another go.
A repeat from last year, but since Christmas shopping officially started today, here's a handy guide on how to make your Christmas less problematic:
https://babylonbee.com/news/10-ways-to-make-your-christmas-less-problematic
Lol. I love that the bee actually writes articles that are occasionally hysterical. The onion could only ever do headlines.
At last, a LandoverBaptist True Christian™ travels all the way to Reason to convert the heathen to the joys of girl-bullying, asset forfeiture and the eugenic merits of huge victimless prison populations and economic collapse. How special!
No, it's easy. Stop swallowing the anti-American propaganda of her enemies.
This ad juxtaposes the two dueling narratives in Russia at the time - that of the revanchist we-were-better-off-with-Stalin oldsters versus the Westernizing and hopeful young. It offers no prediction as to which narrative would win. But the only claim they agree on is true: Russia has Pizza Hut now, thanks in part to the way Gorbachev wound down the USSR.
(spoiler alert: the asshole revanchists won, as seemingly always, Russia has never been free)
You can blame the Goldman Sachs looters for the failure of a republic in Russia today..
No, I'm pretty sure I can blame the ex-KGB strongman who pays internet trolls to blame privatization for his fief's many woes.
The bad economy, which enhanced dissatisfaction amongst many of the satellite republics & states, the defeat in Afghanistan and Chernobyl were going to make a tough go for anyone holding power there.
Russia was looted by an inbred christian prohibitionist monarchy that murdered Jews wholesale and worshipped the initiation of deadly force at the altar of altruism. The Great War over Serbian opium supplies (14% morphine content) conscripted a rabble in arms and communist dogma (as in 1793 France) riddled the crowned heads with bullets. Once communism proved even worse (as in France) conservatism dragged them back to the Dark Ages. You wouldn't want them to let go of altruism, would you?
Russia threw off 70 years of brutal marxism and instead of being allowed to slowly find their path forward, Goldman Sachs and the Clinton Admin sent in NYC investment bankers to loot and "burn" setting the course for Putin's rise. So many of the "Goldman" kids grandparents immigrated from Russia and they had "old world" issues and enjoyed looting the "Czar's" land. The weird thing is the mass migration to the US of communists and socialists since 1900 to the US..a country they obviously hate its traditions (look at the neocons..the worst of the anti-traditional American values like non intervention).
Russia shrugged off 70 years of brutal Marxism which it imposed through violence on every single one of its neighbors. And now it longs for its return. Because of liars peddling blame-the-other narratives, like you.
Russia continues to choose homegrown horrors over others' solutions.
Russia had been invaded multiple times by western powers with the most recent occurring after the inception of the Soviet Union. The Red Army rid those lands of the western invaders. Establishing compliant soviet satellites in the aftermath helped ensure future aggressions against them would be more difficult. Of course, many of those non-Russian locals disagreed. And the Russians in those non-Russian states do not like the western European neo-colonialism.
The Red Army rid the lands of a lot of people. They also hardly engaged the Allied forces that were in Russia in 1918, which I assume is the thin reed you're trying to sustain this latest absurd narrative. Or, are you talking about Stalin's best friend Hitler, whose invasion and betrayal shocked him, after they had agreed to mutually carve up the innocent people of Eastern Europe.
Mostly, the Red Army were liquidating the Russian people who would not submit to their new masters during the Russian Revolution (and well after), and then conducting wars of conquest against their neighbors.
Millions of innocent people died because of evil men protecting an evil empire. We already know you're a liar, how much further is to evil?
Why don't you fuck off and make a new handle like the other Russian trolls usually do, when their perfidy is laid bare? Of course, each time you start saying shit like "western European neo-colonialism" the mask slips. That's a professional tip from me to you.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty was to buy the Soviet Union time. They weren’t surprised that Operation Barbarosa occurred. Just the timing and effectiveness of the Wehrmacht (the latter in part due to the military purges). Stalin long held that Hitler would invade eastward based on him having read Mein Kampf. Stalin studied those with an opposing view. More than can be said of you.
The rest of your post is strawmanning and shit flinging. In addition to visiting the western shore of the Black Sea, you need to go to Russia and talk with people. You’ll hopefully gain some understanding of what their Great Patriotic War means to them, why they didn’t want it repeated again and what they did to prevent that. You won’t find many Stalin apologists. Nor will you find whitewashing of gulags and other atrocities.
Today in the United States, there are proverbial calls for Civil War 2.0 over a person using deadly force to stop three people attacking him. Their nation was invaded with millions killed, towns wiped off the map, raping, executions and looting. Germany’s Fall Blau plan would have killed every person in Stalingrad, had it been successful.
So, a liar spends more words to call me ignorant.
Seems pretty superfluous. Your assessments aren't credible.
To the extent you're here to represent the proud Russian people who don't really like Stalin (despite polling to the contrary) and to convey their righteous views on legitimately invading their neighbors to protect themselves against Barbarossa 2.0 (and for no other reason) you kind of poisoned the well. What with the lying. About the invasions.
The Russians I know, who all live there, make fun of him openly. There are older Russians that look back to the halcyon days of the Soviet Union. I don’t know any babushkas so I can’t say their specific feelings on him. One of my older Romanian friends speaks well of the communist period there. She was quoted in my article on that country. I see it similarly.
The Soviets “invaded” as far as Berlin. That was decided at Yalta by the three major Allied superpowers. Complete destruction of the Wehrmacht. They wanted to avoid the “we never lost on the battlefield/stabbed in the back” fallacy that followed the Great War and planted the seeds for its sequel. They were at war as a result of Germany invading. Should the Soviets have stopped at the prewar border when pushing the Germans back? The western Allies would have protested. Interestingly, when the Berlin Wall began to fall in 1989, Thatcher contacted Gorbachev and asked him to stop it. Four and a half decades later there was fear in England of a united Germany. They had a body of water and a superior navy to protect it. The British lost countless lives on the continent. And more in the Blitz and to submarines. But they never had German boots on their ground like in the east. At least 20,000,000 Soviets died in that war with many being civilians. Moscow didn’t have the English Channel. They saw western proliferation and used satellite republics and states to accomplish similar.
The rest of your post is wishful thinking fabrication by an irrelevant authority.
Go to Russia and experience for yourself. Otherwise, you’ll continue to have Brussels sprout from your mouth.
For the audience, especially anyone foolish enough to listen to this liar, here's him denying Russia's invasions:
https://reason.com/2021/11/18/a-glimmer-of-success-in-miserable-moldova/?comments=true#comment-9217982
This is a paid Russian troll, although he probably should be fired for how he boxed himself in and proved he was lying. There are plenty of other Russians without good job prospects in Putin's failing fascist petro-state who could do a more convincing job lying on the internet.
He's here to pretend to be a Trumpkin and get you on board with Russia's foreign policy. (Or domestic policy. That's complicated while they're trying to conquer their neighbors).
You have lost your mind. If your libel affected my career as an engineer, you’d be served. But seeing as your words have no value, I rreally won’t bother.
Admittedly, you can't measure my words here by how much I'm paid for them.
What's your rate?
If you are paid more than $0.00, somebody else is getting ripped off.
As an engineer, my billing rate is $100/hr.
Titus is proof Superstitious Republicans have cornered the market on economic fallacies. To this day mystical conservatives struggle to believe that The Crash and Depression "occurred" while Christian socialist prohibitionism made light beer a chain-gang, asset-forfeiture felony "by complete coincidence!" Banning 5% of the economy could never destabilize anything! The Wizened Christian Temperance Union and Prohibition Party said so!
Looks like they're calling the new variant "Omicron", which sounds like "Necronomicon"--like it out of a horror movie. Why not name it something innocuous? I have a few suggestions. I don't expect them to name Covid-19 variants after women these days, like they used to do with hurricanes, but there are some ex-girlfriends I had who were a lot like a pandemic. None of them killed anybody, that I'm aware of, but they were extremely expensive, turned everyone against each other, and life couldn't go back to normal until they were gone. Actually, I'd rather catch Omicron than have to deal with any of them again.
Clatoo, Verata Achoo
Nobody needs 26 pizza toppings.
Thanks! I hadn't seen that one. The internet makes some teevee memes bearable in small doses. Observe in current Russian movies well-fed people, nice clothes, smiling faces... sooo different from when we pirated Soviet teevee off of satellite broadcasts in the 1980s.