This Social Worker Wants To Help Special Needs Kids. Louisiana Says She Has To Prove She's Needed.
The state "wants to limit how many agencies they have to regulate," says Ursula Newell-Davis.

"Why does Louisiana have the right to stop me from doing what I love to do?" asks Ursula Newell-Davis in my new video.
Newell-Davis has helped people. She's a social worker who's worked with kids with special needs for 20 years. She's really good at it.
"She helped teach me how to talk to people," says Kamal, who never had friends before.
His mother adds, "She explained to me things that I didn't understand about my kids."
Newell-Davis helped many families like hers. Her clients are ecstatic about her work.
Now she wants to help more kids by starting her own business focusing on "respite" work. "Respite" means acting as backup to a primary caregiver. They fill in for a few hours or days to give a parent a break.
"Someone that can go in and teach their child a different skill," Newell-Davis says.
She has a college degree, a master's degree, and a social work license. But Louisiana bureaucrats won't let her do respite work unless she can prove "there is a need for an additional HCBS provider in the geographic location for which the application is submitted" and "the probability of serious, adverse consequences to recipients' ability to access health care if the provider is not allowed to be licensed."
What!? Why?
"Louisiana wants to limit how many agencies they have to regulate," says Newell-Davis. "That makes it easy for the state."
Easy for the state? Yes, that's the actual reason.
Anastasia Boden of the Pacific Legal Foundation is helping Newell-Davis sue Louisiana, trying to get the law declared unconstitutional.
"Louisiana gives you no clue about how to prove you're needed," says Boden. Even if they did, "That would be difficult for even the best entrepreneurs."
I thought about my career and said, "I couldn't prove that I'm needed."
"The only way to find out is to open up your doors and try!" replies Boden.
But Newell-Davis isn't allowed to try.
She gave regulators what they demanded. She paid their $200 fee, rented office space, and explained why her work is needed. She wrote many pages about rising youth crime and how respite care could help these kids.
But Louisiana said that wasn't good enough."
In fact, Louisiana turns down most applicants.
This is crazy. Special needs kids need more help, not less.
The government's excuse: "Regulating is a resource-intensive process." Rejecting applicants helps "limit the burden on regulators."
Streamlining the application process would be a better solution.
"Imagine if government argued that it didn't have enough money to administer driver's license exams," says Boden. "That's just not a legitimate excuse."
I tried to interview a regulator, but not one would answer our emails or calls.
So, a Stossel TV producer went to Baton Rouge.
As you see in my video, the government's offices are quite nice. I wish they spent less on buildings and more on serving people.
A security guard diligently called one health department person after another. It went to voicemail again and again.
Too busy rejecting applications? Sleeping? Who knows?
Later one sent us an email saying, "We'd be happy to work…on providing information."
"Work on it?" Is providing information so hard? It must be. Weeks later, they still haven't told us anything.
Unfortunately, 39 states have similar laws. They're called "CON laws" because entrepreneurs must get "Certificates of Need" to open certain businesses. They must prove they're needed.
Some states demand it of moving companies, hospitals, ambulance services.
People in Kentucky wait longer to get to a hospital because Kentucky's CON law makes it hard to offer an ambulance service.
Louisiana is the only state that applies its CON law to respite care.
Sure enough, "Consumers in Louisiana are less satisfied with their care," says Boden. "Complaints go up year after year."
Why do these laws stay on the books?
Because established businesses don't like competition. They lobby legislators, and legislators dutifully protect them.
Consumers get screwed.
COPYRIGHT 2021 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sarc hardest hit.
Why are you wasting your time depending on your monthly salary when you can work staying at home just with your PC and mobile phone you can KJQ earn up to $4000 within 3 days
Feel free to learn more... WorkJoin1
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…FJI And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
Start earning today from $600 to $754 easily by working online from home. Last month i have generate and received $19663 from this job by giving this only maximum 2 hours a day of my life. Easiest job in the world and earning from this job are just awesome. Everybody can now get this job and start earning cash online....
For more details.......... Visit Here
There are so many minor injustices and market distortions. You could spend an entire legislative career trying to root them out and not get to the bottom of them. It pretty sad, but you are doing good work pointing them out.
Stossel and Dave Barry and this type of "reporting" were crucial to my move towards libertarianism. After decades of hearing about all the stupid shit that states do, a switch flipped in my mind. Any time some activist talked about needed regulations or a colleague at work pounded the table declaring, "There oughta be a law!" I would immediately think about one of these articles- about how absurd it would be when the real impact of this law was realized on the poor and unconnected.
This year do not worry about money you can start a new Business and do an online job I have started a new Business and I am making over $84, 8254 per month I was started with 25 persons company DGh now I have make a company of 200 peoples you can start a Business with a company of 10 to 50 peoples or join an online job.
For more info Open on this web Site............Pays24
Certificate Of Need sounds an awful lot like something out of Atlas Shrugged...
"Then, Wesley Mouch had issued another directive, which ruled that people could get their bonds “defrozen” upon a plea of “essential need”: the government would purchase the bonds, if it found proof of the need satisfactory. there were three questions that no one answered or asked: “What constituted proof?” “What constituted need?” “Essential-to whom?” …One was not supposed to speak about the men who, having been refused, sold their bonds for one-third of the value to other men who possessed needs which, miraculously, made thirty-three frozen cents melt into a whole dollar, or about a new profession practiced by bright young boys just out of college, who called themselves “defreezers” and offered their services “to help you draft your application in the proper modern terms.” The boys had friends in Washington."
It's especially laughable with CoN laws, because the politicians have been shrieking about protecting the hospitals for the last two years. Yet we never discuss adding more supply..........
Ursula Newell-Davis needs to re-formulate her work as being "making speaking appearances" to those who would like to hear her speeches. Retired politicians do this all the time, for untold thousands of dollars, at times. This would make it VERY EXPLICIT that we are talking of freedom of speech, here!
(If a kid from time to time needs some tissues to dry their tears, or a pat on the back, this is hardly "dispensing medicine". If flag-burning and naked titty dancing, from time to time, can be called free speech, then SURELY tissues and pats on the back are free speech as well.)
Too busy rejecting applications? Sleeping? Who knows?
Most likely sleeping. Whenever my job took me through government office buildings, the people who weren't standing around and talking were literally asleep at their desks.
Good enough for government work.
Hi) My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old) Looking for a naughty man to exchange private 18+ pics. If interested, my profile - http://xurl.es/id378955
Hear about that Russian astronaut that got caught sending dick pics from space? Talk about cosmonaughty!
In space, no one can hear you cream.
Tony was happily surprised to hear that NASA was planning, “A manned mission to Uranus.”
Did Tony have a meteoric rise?
Asstronomically so.
Well that's a heck of a lot more intelligent than any post by... you know who you are.
You?
"Louisiana wants to limit how many agencies they have to regulate,"
Look inward first.
+10000 Perfectly stated.
I think the problem starts with the feds: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/home-community-based-services/home-community-based-services-authorities/home-community-based-services-1915c/index.html
In other words, federal regs are inviting the states to be restrictive in the very types of ways Stossel is complaining about by Louisiana.
You mean the feds don't actually like small biz?
Paraphrased,
"The [WE] mob MUST maintain a FULL monopoly! Can't have Individuals thinking they can replace the [WE] mob ideology!"
"Especially in any part of the mental/physical health sector! Don't you individuals realize how much STOLEN money the [WE] mob has spend building a monopoly on healthcare! The very idea of allowing just an individual to help another individual; WTF... NO!"
There is only the [WE] Gov-Gods! Have no other 'Gods' before thee.
I struggle to find empathy here, but if she wants to open a business let her. State wants less trouble? Write fewer regulations.
If the state finds regulating too difficult maybe it shouldn't.