40 Years of Trillion-Dollar Debt
Forty years from now, it'll be much, much, much higher.

On October 22, 1981—exactly 40 years ago today—America's national debt hit $1 trillion for the first time.
"If we, as a nation, need a warning," President Ronald Reagan said in a televised address a few weeks before the country surpassed the 13-figure debt threshold, "let that be it."
Today, the national debt exceeds $28 trillion. In the fiscal year that concluded at the end of last month, the country added another $2.77 trillion to the pile, the Treasury Department announced just this morning. The Congressional Budget Office anticipates that the country will add at least another $1 trillion to the deficit for just about every year in the foreseeable future—and that's even without any new spending.
If a trillion-dollar debt was a warning sign, it was ignored.
The Washington Post's contemporaneous coverage of the symbolic 1981 milestone is now a quaint window into a strange world. The paper reported that the country surpassed $1 billion in debt during the Civil War and then $500 billion in the mid-1970s. "In other words, half of the current trillion-dollar debt was incurred in the last seven years," the Post noted.
Shocking, right? Now, we run up half-trillion-dollar debts every few months.
It's true, of course, that $1 trillion doesn't buy what it used to. That amount in 1981 would purchase about $3 trillion worth of stuff today. The best way to measure the national debt over long periods of time is to compare it to America's gross domestic product (GDP), a rough estimate of the size of the country's economy in a given year.
In the early 1980s, for example, even as the gross national debt exceeded $1 trillion for the first time, the national debt was less than 40 percent of GDP. The national debt is now equivalent to the country's GDP and is on pace to be nearly 200 percent of GDP by the middle of the century, as this chart from Brian Riedl, a deficit hawk and former Republican Senate staffer now working at the Manhattan Institute, helpfully illustrates:

Another useful way to measure the growing national debt is to look at how much it would cost the average American household to pay it off. Again, the trend in recent decades is not a good one.
Rising costs of entitlement programs and the interest on the debt itself are the primary reasons why the debt will keep growing. In other words, even cutting a lot of discretionary spending would have little effect on the debt at this point.
The guilty parties are, well, both parties. It was fitting that the debt hit the symbolic $1 trillion figure during Reagan's presidency, as the Gipper ignored his own warning. Republicans have spent much of the past 40 years venerating Reagan as an icon of conservative values, including supposedly limited government. And while his successors ran up far larger amounts on the nation's credit card, Reagan saw the government surpass not only the $1 trillion debt threshold but also the $2 trillion threshold.
Meanwhile, few Democrats today agree with President Bill Clinton's admonition that "we have got to deal with this big, long-term debt problem, or it will deal with us."
"It will gobble up a bigger and bigger percentage of the federal budget we'd rather spend on education and health care and science and technology," Clinton, the last president to reduce the size of the national debt over a single fiscal year, warned at the 2012 Democratic National Convention.
The guiding principle for today's Democratic Party is the idea that debt doesn't really matter if interest rates remain low. So long as the cost of servicing the federal debt stays below 2 percent, policymakers should not be restrained by the "traditional idea of a cyclically balanced budget," Larry Summers, Clinton's treasury secretary, and former Obama economic adviser Jason Furman argued in an influential paper published last year.
But the past 40 years would suggest that lawmakers have almost never been restrained by the idea of balanced budgets—a few brief interludes of fiscal sanity notwithstanding.
It took nearly two centuries for America to accumulate $1 trillion in public debt. It took 40 years to increase that amount 28 times over. If we refuse to address the breakneck speed at which America spends money it doesn't have, how long until Clinton's warning is realized, and that debt deals with us?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Eliminate the alphabet soup agencies. Pay off the debt. And do not repeat.
I would follow this to the letter.
ABC, as easy as 123.
Proggi counts can't count to 3
The DEBT is not the DEFICIT. And the DEFICIT is not the DEBT. They are separate problems.
Government BORROWING drives up the debt, not government SPENDING.
The solution to our debt problem is simple: STOP ISSUING DEBT-BASED MONEY! Begin issuing pure “unbacked” fiat money to fund the deficit, rather than going further into debt. The inflationary impact of unbacked dollars is no worse than the inflationary impact of the same amount of debt-backed dollars. Issuing unbacked dollars will halt the increase in the national debt and its crushing $479 billion in annual interest. Paying off part of the maturing debt each year and rolling over the rest will eventually bring the national debt (and its taxpayer-financed interest payments) down to zero. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
What could go wrong?
Less than is going wrong now. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…Fh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........VISIT HERE
These are 2 pay checks $78367 and $87367. that i received in last 2 months. I am very happy that i can make thousands in my part time and now i am enjoying my life.ghj Everybody can do this and earn lots of dollars from home in very short time period. Your Success is one step away Click Below Webpage…..
Just visit this website now…… Visit Here
"...Government BORROWING drives up the debt, not government SPENDING..."
And we are to believe they are unrelated? Sarc or stupidity?
They're related now. They don't have to be.. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
There literally isn't enough money in the economy for the government to tax in order to fund spending without debt. Debt and spending are, for all intents and purposes, one thing now.
No they're not. Government can create fiat money with or without issuing bonds. No bonds = no debt. See http://www.fixourmoney.com .
Sarc or stupidity?
Hey Guys, I know you read many news comments and posts to earn money online jobs. Some people don’t know how to earn money and are saying to fake it. You trust me. I just started this 4 weeks ago. I’ve got my FIRST check total of $1850, pretty cool. I hope you tried it.UJl You don’t need to invest anything. Just click and open the page to click the first statement and check jobs .. ..
Go Here................ Pays 24
The Debt is the sum total of all Deficits of all individual years. So it's all of a single piece.
The on,y way to do that means action beyond elections and the courts.
I am making a good salary online from home.I’ve made 97,999 dollar’s so for last 5 months working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I’m just so happy that I found out about it.
Try it, you won't regret it!........ VISIT HERE
More likely to have default on the debt, economic collapse and a new currency issued. Starting over might be the only way. The USSR/Russia went through it, but they survived and are doing pretty good right now. Like him or hate him, Putin paid down Russia's debt recently when it had grown huge after the collapse. Seems he has more economic sense than our lawmakers.
I'm already preparing my young daughter on how to frame her mind when she (hopefully) buys her first little starter condo. Expect to pay $350,000 for around 600-900 square feet, and that's in the unhip part of town. Triple, quintuple that if it's in the cool neighborhood.
900 square feet? You could fit three or four families in there!
/The Sanders Crowd
As opposed to 3-4 houses for just the Sanders family.
That’s different because shut up.
My daughter just bought this for $105000. $650 payments for a 2 bedroom condo in a nice area of town. Iowa where the living is low cost.
Triple that today in urban CA.
The cool part of town is where you’ll find KillAllRednecks…….
Panhandling. To buy beer one can at a time.
I prepped my children by not having any. (What? And leave them all this???)
It took nearly two centuries for America to accumulate $1 trillion in public debt. It took 40 years to increase that amount 28 times over. If we refuse to address the breakneck speed at which America spends money it doesn't have, how long until Clinton's warning is realized, and that debt deals with us?
Well, next time, I would strongly recommend reading the candidate's website before you vote. But that's just me.
Didn’t Boehm vote for Biden? He certainly worked round the clock last year to attack Trump. Sometimes with more than one article per day.
But Trump spent money too, so bowf sydes!
Trump spent as much money in one term as Obama did in two.
Already the annual deficit is roughly a few percent of the GDP, more more than the growth rate of the economy. Of that the interest on the debt is roughly 2%.
Clearly this path leads to de facto if not an announced devaluation of the dollar.
I mean while I agree debt is bad... does he actually not understand exponential growth?
FYI, according to polite company, constantly scrutinizing Biden weakens America. Stop SCRUTINIZING!
No, but SleepyJoe does.
Forbes: unlike the rest of the world, Americans freely and vociferously criticize their leadership. Now that Trump is gone, we need to stop this so people respect us.
And in 40 years it won't matter either. Find a new boogeyman, Reason dot com
In 40 years, Reason will be calling for the execution of anyone to the right of Stalin.
Not the execution, just the banning from restaurants, movies, social media, rental properties, grocery stores, mass transit, private home ownership or the purchase of any form of weapon. As long as private companies are doing the banning.
Wait until breathing becomes a privilege due to the climate crisis.
The exhale tax will solve that problem.
And enforced by the lung arm of the law.
Private companies should have the right to pick and choose who they serve just as you have the right to pick and choose what private companies to shop at.
Highly selective desire for personal liberty, not unlike steaming piles of lefty shit.
"And in 40 years it won’t matter either. Find a new boogeyman, Reason dot com"
Lefty shits are more than happy with raging inflation.
They only jobs our government knows how to create are public jobs which increases our debt. If they would just address the waste it would be a good start.
What about the 87,000 new high paying jobs with good benefits at the IRS? Those jobs may partially pay for themselves by extracting more wealth from the small business owners who somehow made it through the lockdowns.
We all know the only way a small business could have survived the lockdowns was by cheating .
Or own their business out right. That's how we survived. No debt.
Debt free is always a wise choice.
There is very little actual waste. The excess spending is a web of graft to compensate ampaign supporters and cronies by paying far more than necessary for most things. If one of them outs any of the others, then they lose their cozy little layoffs too.
Nancy Pelosi was correct in her own way when she said “there’s nothing left to cut”.
The only jobs our government knows how to create are public jobs which increases our debt. If they would just address the waste it would be a good start.
Thanks for reminding us the only Prez to retire bonds was Democrat Clinton..
Time to face facts: Spending will not get cut and Taxes will NEVER exceed spending hence debt will only grow.
Retired and replaced, wasn't it?
IIRC he retired older, high-interest bonds from the stagflation days, and issued newer, low-interest ones to cover the cost.
It really is kind of insane to think that old Slick Willie was the last even moderately good president we had. In spite of his personal lack of self-control and other issues, he was fundamentally am honest-to-goodness pragmatist compared to everyone who has come since.
The only reason he was worth half a shit was because if he wanted to get anything done, he had to deal with Gingrich. Do you really think there would have been any good fiscal policy if the democrats were in charge of congress?
How cares about anyone's speculation of why. The fact is he will be the last President to preside over a balanced budget.
"How cares about anyone’s speculation of why. The fact is he will be the last President to preside over a balanced budget."
got another live one here, folks. Who's got the snake oil? We can make a killing!
He had a deficit every year. His balanced budget was simply spending what he agrees to but not getting as much revenue as he estimated. Debt increased every year of his presidency and was set by the House not by him.
You're right, but what a contrast compared to Block Insane Yomomma, who's response after he lost congress was to say "Fuck you, I'm going to destroy this country if it's the last thing I ever do, whether you like it or not."
"Thanks for reminding us the only Prez to retire bonds was Democrat Clinton.."
turd isn't the only lefty shit to constantly lie. Why do they expect to be taken seriously, peddling such obvious bullshit.
This is like commie-shit claiming moonbeam 'balanced the CA budget!!!'. Of course; he scrounged all the change from under the cushions in the state capital, paid the $25 minimum on the debt that month and claimed the budget was 'balanced'.
Lefty shits are congenital liars.
40 years from now, this country won't exist.
Then we have very little to lose if we get rid of the democrats now.
We won't make it even 10 years. The next president will be the last.
28.9 trillion now.
It was 10.8 trillion as recently as 2008.
This is one case where "both sides bad" really is true.
But Dems want to make things much, much worse.
Bush added 800 billion in TARP bailouts, which Obama added to the annual baseline.
Trump added 2 trillion in COVID lockdown bailouts, which Biden added to the annual baseline.
And now Dems want to spend 4.7 trillion more (divided by TBD number of years), on top of the new "baseline" of 6 trillion (it was under 4 trillion a few years ago.)
The way out is to get back to the normal bloated 4-trillion-dollar budget from 3 years ago, then stop the spending hikes. Let tax revenues catch up as the economy grows.
That on,y works of we apply subtraction. Specifically subtracting the Marxist population from this country.
Tarp actually made a small profit. DHS and FEMA growth killed Bushs budget.
It was fitting that the debt hit the symbolic $1 trillion figure during Reagan's presidency, as the Gipper ignored his own warning. Republicans have spent much of the past 40 years venerating Reagan as an icon of conservative values, including supposedly limited government. And while his successors ran up far larger amounts on the nation's credit card, Reagan saw the government surpass not only the $1 trillion debt threshold but also the $2 trillion threshold.
Boehm of course is too young to actually remember any of this because the boy wasn't even born until towards the very end of Reagan's presidency, but there are a couple of important notes here:
1) The first two to three years of his presidency, America was still fighting its way out of our worst extended economic period since the Great Depression. Interest rates were still sky-high (especially compared to now) as Volcker was administering the painful medicine needed to get the inflation under control.
2) Tip O'Neill, though a democrat, was still an American patriot and not a New Age, New Left America-hating far leftie. Because of this, he (quietly) agreed with Reagan and Pope John II that the Soviet Union was an evil empire, a scourge on humanity that needed to be brought down. So they made an agreement to jack up defense spending in order to either make the U.S.S.R. realize there was simply no way they could ever defeat us in an arms race, or bankrupt themselves trying.
Well guess what: the strategy actually worked! A couple of years after Reagan, the Evil Empire was indeed bankrupted and defeated, and the Iron Curtain came down. America was supposed to then benefit from the "peace dividend" we would get afterwards once we scaled back the increased defense spending, and for a while it looked like that indeed was going to happen. But then the "compassionate conservative" and horrible George W. Bush came along and pretty much ruined everything.
The graph is obviously wrong. The president from 2016 to 2020 was the most libertarian, fiscally responsible, intelligent and good looking president ever. He cut government, cut spending, cut the debt, and made America grate again. Fucking lies from unReason staffed by Biden voters.
It’s obvious you’re a loud mouthed, drunken moron.
He was blaming Bush for schools today. This year.
I didn't even have to click the gray box to know you meant sarcasmic there... Oof.
You are obviously full of shit, steaming pile of lefty shit.
National debt "held by the public" is a good one.
I assume they are excluding national debt held by other government agencies (primarily the SS Administration). Guess who's on the hook to pay off that debt too?
One day they will call in all this debt, and then it will be ball gags for everyone.
“The guiding principle for today's Democratic Party is the idea that debt doesn't really matter if interest rates remain low.”
And the guiding principal behind today’s Republican party is that deficits don’t matter… ever.
You're an idiot. The first step to healing is admitting you're about as sharp as a potato. The second step is shutting the fuck up, you lefty shill.
Conquering and Consuming more with every "Big Plan".
Because that's what Democratic National Socialists (Nazi's) do....
And Republicans don’t?
Bowf sidez?
Yes, in fact. Did that bother you?
Not nearly as much; which is undeniable.
Hahaha. Maybe, like, know the facts first?
Reagan: increased deficits. Started with a deficit of 78.9 billion, would up running annual deficits as high as 175 billion through the mid-80s. Final year of his term, deficit: 152.6 billion.
Bush I: increased deficits. Last two years in office Ran deficits of 290 billion and 255 billion.
Clinton: reduced deficits. Actually balanced the budget and bright them down to zero. Final year in office ran a surplus of 128 billion.
Bush II: increased deficits. Inherited a surplus. Left office with a deficit of 1.4 TRILLION.
Obama: reduced deficits. Last two years in office deficits were 440 billion and 580 billion.
Trump: increased deficits. In FY 2028 he ran a 779 billion deficit, and the 2019 deficit was 984 billion. That’s all before the pandemic.
Literally every Republican administration since Reagan has increased deficits over their predecessor, and every Democratic administration has decreased them.
But you don’t actually care about government spending or fiscal responsibility, of course. Because … say it with me: “Deficits… don’t… matter!”
Brian Kirk:
Not going to waste time proving it, but
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
And either you know it and are a fucking lefty lying pile of shit, or you are too stupid to know you are.
Fuck off and die, asshole
You must be Captain Kirks retarded brother.
Or just one more lying lefty shit.
Not a lefty. And lying about what? Facts are facts. In the last fifty years, Republicans administrations have increased the debt more than Democratic ones. Both in pure dollars and in deficits as a percentage of GDP.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die; make your dog happy, asshole.
Oh, and 'not a lefty'?'
Stuff it up your ass, lefty steaming pile ort shit.
No. What a strange thing to suggest.
Anyway, I actually have facts, some of which I’ve delineated above should you care to read them. Probably not. They might confuse you.
Anyway,
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
I actually have facts --- So show them already!!!!
Obama Ran over $1T EVERY F*CKEN YEAR you retarded troll....
Until Republicans put an end to his spending spree...
Then Biden dropped $2T in his first F*CKEN Month...
And is pushing for $6T......................
Everyone knows this; the fact you think your LIES are going to convince anyone is pathetic.
The national debt is now equivalent to the country's GDP and is on pace to be nearly 200 percent of GDP by the middle of the century
, assuming the nation is producing anything of value at that point.
You can always rely on the young leftist twits they have writing for Reason to both sides Republicans as much as possible for the ruinous debt that has been run up predominately by the Democrats' social programs.
The entire military is less than half of Medicare and Social Security in any given year.
But I have a more specific thing to shit on the communist named (checks byline) Eric Boehm for today. The national debt ran up under Reagan's presidency because, unlike the stagflation that preceded and began it, inflation was brought to heel. Which meant that the existing debt and borrowing costs got more expensive, in order to fund the same (ruinous, Democrat, social) spending that existed before it. Not to mention, Reagan had a Democratic House for his entire presidency. It was, as ever, give them some more of their ruinous spending or shut the government down.
Oh, and the alternative to slaying inflation was letting it continue to evaporate away the value of Americans' assets. Mostly, the idiot author's parents' wealth. Reagan chose policy correctly, despite the unworthiness of some of the beneficiaries.
"The entire military is less than half of Medicare and Social Security in any given year."
and yet BOTH parties support lavish spending on Both the Military and Medicare/Social security as well as scores of other frivolous spending. Trump spent almost twice as much in one term as Obama did in two. And BOTH spent lavishly on the Military.
"and yet BOTH parties support lavish spending on Both the Military and Medicare/Social..."
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
It's a fact. Republicans along with democrats refuse to touch the ballooning Medicare/Social Security. And Democrats along with republican's repeatedly support the wasteful and expensive spending on the unnecessary F-35 fighter jet.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
You.
Never.
Make.
Valid.
Arguments.
And.
Present.
No.
Counter.
Facts.
And.
Just.
Make.
Knee.
Jerk.
Retarded.
Comments.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Because.
Your.
LIES.
are.
so.
obvious.
Everyone.
Knows.
You're.
a.
troll.
and.
any.
fact.
presented.
you'd.
deny.
by.
pure.
ignorance.
Why would I bother replying to such a lying pile of shit with much more than:
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Out of all the Spending one could complain about you pick the one thing that's actually a part of the National Government Job. National Defense.
One party is constantly plotting to block grant or otherwise bring those exorbitant social program expenditures to heel. The other party supports expanding them instead.
One party supports military spending (on military preparedness) the other party supports spending an equal or greater amount on making the military into woke ambassadors to the country and the world.
Anyone who 'both sides' Republicans on spending is a Democrat, or their useful idiot.
Time for a balanced budget Amendment ("except in time of declared war, and for the sole purposes of fighting that war, the Federal government shall not spend more (in outlays and debt payment) than it takes in in all forms" - or word to that effect). a Presidential line item veto (bye bye alphabet soup agencies) and an Amendment that requires a 3/4 majority of both the House and Senate to establish any new Federal agencies.
GroundTruth
(I/me/mine)
Let's go Brandon!
BOTH parties are responsible for the Nation's out of control spending not just the democrats. Trump spent as much money in one term as Obama did in two.
What a load of propaganda B.S. and you know it.
No, Guy2010 is a steaming pile of lefty shit who shows up, posts a lie or two and then disappears.
Seems he grabs the latest talking point from Vox or some such and repeats it; thinking is not among his skill sets.
Guy2010? Fuck off and die.
The truth is not "Leftist". It's a fact, that until the Democrats get their 3.5 Trillion dollar package passed, it was trump that signed the largest spending package in America's history. If Trump cared about stopping wasteful spending he would have vetoed it.
It's a fact that Democrats ALREADY passed a $2T stimulus spending package. They also wrote 87% of the Cares Act. Yes, Trump should've Vetoed it - but cherry-picking blame on Trump for a Democratic Written, Pushed and Supported Act is petty in comparison. Democrats initiated it ALL.
Forget the 3.5 Trillion. Trump was running higher annual deficits than Obama even BEFORE the pandemic. WITH a Republican Congress.
Facts are facts.
Cherry-picking knows no boundaries in leftards.
Obama TRIPPLED the defecit EVERY F*CKEN YEAR his first term with a Democratic Congress.
Of which Trump and Republicans NEVER MATCHED EVER!!!!
And the last term of Obama was cut in half by a Republican Congress.
And even the curs'ed Cares-Act was pitched, pushed and fully supported by every F*CKEN Democrat......
Yet; Leftards like you will sit in ignorance and blame it all on Republicans for NOT FULL-STOPPING Democrats... UR such a partisan hack.
Facts are facts......
Trump ran higher deficits than Obama every year of his presidency. Period.
He was not fiscally responsible. He increased the debt. Period.
I know you ???? the guy because you think he pwns the woketards or something. But pretending “the King of Debt” even remotely cared about the deficit/debt is just nonsense. No Republican administration has given a crap about debt in half a century.
"...Trump ran higher deficits than Obama every year of his presidency. Period..."
Lefty cherry-picking piles of shit are assholes. Period.
Fuck off and die.
FLAT LIES..
Obama + [D] Congress (2009-2012) - All YEARS 1.1T to 1.4T
Obama + [R] House & [R] Senate ( 2013-2016 ) - All under 500B
Trump + [R] Congress ( 2017-2020 ) - 500B to 900B (-Cares Act)
Biden + [D] Congress (2020..2021) - 3T to 6T
As I've already told you yet YOU ARE COMPLETELY WILLFULLY IGNORANT OF is the Cares Act was Pitched, Pushed, and Written 87% by the Democrat Party.
https://datalab.usaspending.gov/americas-finance-guide/deficit/trends/
Anyone who isn't a partisan hack knows Democrats want to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND.... EVERY policy they support is about SPEND, SPEND, SPEND.... You'd have to be a complete idiot to pretend otherwise.
"The truth is not “Leftist”..."
You are correct here: Lefty shits like you are rarely if ever truthful.
It took nearly two centuries for America to accumulate $1 trillion in public debt. It took 40 years to increase that amount 28 times over. If we refuse to address the breakneck speed at which America spends money it doesn’t have, how long until Clinton’s warning is realized, and that debt deals with us?
https://uk49prediction.com/
Even worse, Joe Biden has doubled down on his obviously false claim that the Democrat's $3.5 Trillion spending bill "will cost zero".
But instead of correcting Biden's (and Psaki's) obvious lie, the left wing media propagandists and other Democrats continue to cover up for demented and corrupt Joe (whose actions could truly destroy the USA).
It's fair enough to criticize Democrats when they promise that increased spending won't lead to more debt. (Since they won't raise taxes enough to cover that increased spending.) But it isn't engaging in whataboutism to wonder how many of those same people criticizing Democrats on this showed any skepticism when Trump and other Republicans absurdly claimed that their tax cuts would somehow pay for themselves?
If we want to see politicians asked tough questions about the realism of their economic policy proposals, then we should be asking those tough questions of all politicians. Skepticism isn't really skepticism when aimed only at one's political opponents. It's just another form of motivated reasoning.
"...If we want to see politicians asked tough questions about the realism of their economic policy proposals, then we should be asking those tough questions of all politicians. Skepticism isn’t really skepticism when aimed only at one’s political opponents. It’s just another form of motivated reasoning...."
Of course, Trump was never asked tough questions or held to standards far above any D politico, since the media was pro-Trump, right, steaming pile of lefty shit?
Remember "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor", lefty asshole?
I have to be skeptical of libertarian/conservative economic ideas. I've been hearing them for all of my years of political awareness, and I have yet to see what George H.W. Bush called "Voodoo Economics" in 1980 prove itself to actually work. I have yet to see the great wealth gains of those at the top "trickle down" my way.
I am especially disappointed with the continued attacks on the pandemic measures of stimulus checks and expanded unemployment, given the continued slow job growth months after they ended. Several states ended the expanded unemployment benefits in June, yet they did not see boosts to hiring. Something that has gone viral in the last few days is really telling.
The short version is that a guy in Lee County Florida decided to apply for 2 jobs a day throughout September as an experiment and to pick up some extra money if he actually found something. They were all entry level jobs. They all paid between minimum wage ($8.65/hr here at the moment) and $12/hr. Out of 60 applications he got 14 responses total, which lead to 4 phone calls and 1 interview, and no job offers. The one interview? A construction job paying $10/hr for site cleanup. Construction, outdoors, in Florida for $10/hr and people are surprised that hiring is slow? It should also be noted that he specifically went out of his way to apply mostly to businesses whose bosses had been vocal on social media about people being dissuaded from working due to stimulus checks and unemployment benefits.
It seems to me that everyone should be skeptical of the narrative from the right that people are just being lazy and wanting to suck on the government teet. An alternative explanation for what we are seeing is that people are tired of employers having all of the power to pay workers as little as they can while reaping record profits. If you look for counter examples, you can find plenty of articles written up of small businesses, such as restaurants that are not having trouble finding workers when they offer better pay. Supply and demand in action? Who would have thought it would work that way?
"...I have yet to see the great wealth gains of those at the top “trickle down” my way..."
Sarc or stupidity?
Let's make clear what a idiot or liar Jason is:
1980 US per-capita GDP: $12,575
2019 US per-capita GDP: $65,280
(ignored is the 2020 debacle, thanks to the 'trickle up' poverty caused by the D-lefty shit governors knee-capping the economy)
Now, it is certainly possible to remain impoverished or even hungry; all it takes is a dedication to the desire that someone come along and hand you prosperity rather than, perhaps, trying to find some.
Just to pick one obvious pile of bullshit:
"...The one interview? A construction job paying $10/hr for site cleanup. Construction, outdoors, in Florida for $10/hr and people are surprised that hiring is slow?..."
Yes, in FL; that's what unskilled labor sells for. Get a fucking job and quit whining, asshole.
Nice site, i like this site tiger388
“Nice info!”
'The governments plan to solve the debt problem is to tax more and print more money. Both which will increase the debt. Again, it is a spending problem, not a tax or revenue problem.