The Innocence Files
Netflix's limited series documents how bad forensics, faulty witness testimony, and misconduct by police and prosecutors let us down.

In its nearly 30 years of work, The Innocence Project has successfully overturned hundreds of wrongful convictions, often of people who had served decades in prison, some on death row. Across nine episodes, Netflix's The Innocence Files documents several of these cases, showing how bad forensics, faulty witness testimony, and misconduct by police and prosecutors let us down.
The limited series doesn't dedicate each episode to one unjustly imprisoned person's story; instead, it represents larger trends in the criminal justice system's problematic practices. The first three episodes focus on various innocent people convicted by controversial bite-mark forensics evidence that purports to prove that teeth, like fingerprints, can be used as unique identifiers.
The science of bite-mark forensics has since come under fire, and journalist Radley Balko reported on many of its flaws more than a decade ago in the pages of Reason. The series highlights the Innocence Project's work to free men in Mississippi convicted using the bogus practices and testimony of dentist Michael West.
West himself agreed to be interviewed for the series, either oblivious or unconcerned that his surly defensiveness undermines the credibility of bite-mark evidence. Of course, that credibility was already in tatters after numerous exonerations of people he helped convict.
The series also heads over to Lynwood, California, to show a more old-fashioned form of criminal justice corruption: A group of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department officers, faced with gang violence in the early 1990s, pressured teen witnesses to identify one Franky Carrillo as the man responsible for a drive-by shooting. Someone else was responsible, and the witnesses eventually recanted.
These cases and more are masterfully explained for anybody who might have been led astray by the pat "science" of courtroom dramas or the naive belief that cops and prosecutors can be relied on to follow the rules when trying to get a conviction.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The sequel will be called Return to Innocence.
The status of its production thus far has been an enigma.
Seriously paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to ODS generate more cash daily easily. simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now…VISIT HERE
Sarah getting Paid up to $18953 in the week, working on-line at home. I’m full time Student. I shocked when my sister’s told me about her check that was $97k. It’s very easy to do.QEd everybody will get this job. Go to home media tab for additional details……
So I started……… http://gg.gg/w3b6a
We get it Scott, everybody in prison is either innocent doesn't deserve to be there, or it's all society's fault. We've heard this all before from you lying activists.