Afghanistan

Senate Bill Would Help Bring Afghan Interpreters to the U.S.

As the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan approaches, the legislation would reform the Afghan interpreters' visa program.

|

A bipartisan group of senators introduced a bill last week that would improve the special immigrant visa (SIV) program for Afghan interpreters who assisted U.S. troops. With the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan dwindling by the day, many politicians are recognizing the need to get interpreters out of the country quickly.

Interpreters put themselves at great risk to assist American troops. The U.S. government established the SIV program in 2009 to reward interpreters for this "faithful and valuable service." But due to stringent qualifications, a massive application backlog, and administrative errors, many interpreters have found it nearly impossible to access the visas supposedly afforded to them. The average application processing period is now almost three years long.

Lawmakers hope to change that as U.S. troops withdraw from Afghanistan, which is scheduled to be finished by September 11. If passed, the bill would allocate an additional 20,000 visas. That's a significant increase—26,500 SIVs have been allocated since December 2014. The new bill would also change certain eligibility requirements. While interpreters are currently only eligible for SIVs if they served U.S. forces for at least two years, that qualification would be reduced to one year. It would also broaden eligibility to some spouses and dependents of applicants who have been killed.

Though officials stress the importance of quick action, it will take time for the bill to be put to a vote, let alone reach President Joe Biden's desk. Meanwhile, conditions on the ground are making the situation worse. Beginning June 13, the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan suspended visa operations due to an uptick in COVID-19 cases. Calls for alternative means of processing interpreters—including a massive evacuation to Guam, humanitarian parole, and temporary housing in territories of NATO countries—have grown louder as it becomes clear that the current SIV program will not be capable of operating on as speedy a timeline as the troop withdrawal. 

Sen. Angus King (I–Maine) has been an outspoken critic of the long, complicated process that Afghan interpreters must navigate to receive visas. In a call with reporters on Tuesday, King stressed that "this can't be business as usual." 

King, who currently serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said "you cannot operate in a foreign theater without the cooperation and assistance of its residents there who believe in the cause you're supporting." If the U.S. fails to keep its end of the bargain, and if "there's a major bloodbath after we leave Afghanistan," he worries that our inaction could "come back against us in a future situation to the detriment of our own national security." 

"I think the signal it sends is, 'you better not help the Americans, because when the crunch comes, they're gonna abandon you,'" he added. 

Reason previously covered the story of Sayed, an Afghan interpreter who fears that he will be murdered by the Taliban if his SIV application isn't processed soon. "I…have no doubt that I will be targeted and get killed," he said. Hundreds of Afghan interpreters and their family members have faced that fate, and many still might. That makes the new legislation all the more urgent. 

"History judges you for how you go into a war," said King, "but also how you leave it."

NEXT: Connecticut Legislature Passes Bill To Legalize Recreational Marijuana

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Wait, Senators are getting involved in this? Why wouldn’t they just hand this issue over to Kamala Harris?

    1. Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are FDE much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
      on this page…..VISIT HERE

    2. For starters, most healthy people want a job that satisfies their needs, but a job without a social support system can set … Selected Works Cited from Internet.more detail open this link…….VISIT HERE.

    3. Beginning June 13, the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan suspended visa operations due to an uptick in COVID-19 cases.more detail open this link…….VISIT HERE.

  2. With the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan dwindling by the day, many politicians are recognizing the need to get interpreters out of the country quickly.

    This is just a loser mindset. As long as we bring interpreters here, then we are admitting defeat and we are surrender monkey cheese-eater losers.

    Stop admitting defeat. As long as we imagine victory, we are winners.

  3. “you better not help the Americans, because when the crunch comes, they’re gonna abandon you”

    Very true if those Americans are democrats and far left progtards

  4. entire stupid government is one favor for the next favor. seems getting these guys out of Afghanistan post-haste is the right thing todo.

  5. We do not need to import these traitors. Let them suffer the wrath of the countrymen they betrayed.

    1. So, the ‘cave’ part of your screen name refers to Tora Bora?

  6. Collaborators will make fine Americans, I’m sure.

  7. King, who currently serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said “you cannot operate in a foreign theater without the cooperation and assistance of its residents there who believe in the cause you’re supporting.”

    Why does this moosefucker think the collaborators “believed in the cause”? Does he think those Frog whores in Vichy France were all Nazis?

  8. If I were an indigenous warlord or interpreter I would look at the example of America’s previous allies.
    The Vietnamese Montagnards, and the Syrian Kurds have both been abandoned by the U.S. after the U.S. left.

    I would ally with the Russians.
    Look how they stood by Assad and his Alawites.

  9. Yes, but only if they don’t take slots away from all the “undocumented immigrants” that ‘reason’ writers need to keep their lawns and gardens looking good.

  10. What does Pervez Musharraf have to say about this? Not that I’m saying he was an upright human, but supposedly he was our ally? How did that all work out for him?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.