Lisey's Story: Bad Stephen King Book Gets Terrible Apple TV Adaptation
Talented actors like Julianne Moore, Joan Allen go to waste

Lisey's Story. Available Friday, June 4, on Apple TV.
"Every marriage has its own secrets," reads the epigraph on Apple TV's new Stephen King series Lisey's Story. To which many a viewer is going to add: "If only."
Adapted exclusively by King from his own 2006 novel, Lisey's Story is a mess in almost every conceivable way. It's drawn from a leaden and forgettable novel, and King's ponderous attempt at a screenplay has done nothing to improve it. Neither has Chilean director Pablo Larrain's painfully arty translation of the written word into video. And while Lisey's Story is loaded with female star power—Julianne Moore, Jennifer Jason Leigh and Joan Allen play sisters—King and Larrain have given them little to do except look head-bangingly anguished or (in Allen's case) catatonic.
I've been a fan of King since I first read his when-high-school-bullying-goes-wrong novel Carrie in 1975. (Consumer tip: Don't try this alone in your first night in your first house.) But in recent years, his books more and more often read like legal briefs written by somebody bidding for conservatorship of his estate: lots of dull prose and too-familiar storylines. The novel Lisey's Story was a good example, a dreary autopsy on a marriage that was a lot more interesting dead than alive, filled with stuff recycled from his other books: spooky hotel a la The Shining, a private graveyard like the one in Pet Sematary, a homicidal fan strikingly like the one in Misery.
The creepiest thing about the book was that King thought it was one of his best. The second-creepiest was King's explanation of what triggered it: Coming home from a prolonged hospital stay, he discovered his wife had redecorated his writing studio and all his books and papers were gone from the shelves, stored in boxes. To King, it seemed like he was witnessing the clean-up after his own death.
And that is exactly the kick-off point for Lisey's Story. Two years after a King-like horror novelist named Scott Landon (Clive Owen, The Knick) was gunned down by a crazed fan, his wife Lisey (Moore) is trying, though not very hard, to catalog his papers, including some unpublished stories and books. She is increasingly annoyed by a college professor (Ron Cephas Jones, This Is Us) who specializes in the study of Landon's work and wants access to the papers.
But that seems like a small problem compared to the mental collapse of Lisey's sister Amanda (Allen), who reverts to her old habit of slashing herself at the news that her ex-husband has remarried. But wait! That acquisitive college professor enlists a young goon (Dane DeHaan, In Treatment) to assist him in getting hold of Landon's manuscripts, using knives and torches and such to help.
That little summary I just provided was assembled only by heroic effort on my part, given that Lisey's Story is a mélange of inscrutable noir photography, flashback, flashbacks within flashbacks, hallucinations, mystic visions, alternate universes, nightmares—pretty much everything but a random guy punching Dan Rather in the face while screaming, "Kenneth, what is the frequency?" When the show threatens to lapse into coherence (don't worry, it doesn't happen often), the characters start conducting expository conversations through mouthfuls of mushy fried chicken.
Not that comprehensibility is entirely desirable in Lisey's Story. King has littered the screenplay (and before that, the book) with a maddening baby-talk language among the sisters, in which they call one another "babyluv" and worse. Worst of all is the constant reference to "bool hunts"—a sort of weird scavenger hunt that Landon set up for his wife before his death, the grand prize being, well, nothing—and an alternate universe known as "Boo'ya Moon," which makes even less sense than the regular one. King's objective seems to have been to see how many times "bool" and "Boo'ya" can be spoken aloud before viewers begin projectile vomiting at the screen; I don't know what the number is, but I can tell you it's reached in the first seven minutes of the first episode.
All the foregoing aside, there are a few lessons that can be drawn from Lisey's Story. One is that studio executives need to start slapping the teeth out of screenwriters and directors who believe that the illiteracy of films can be masked if you stuff them with enough undifferentiated flashbacks.
Another is that God provided us with studio lighting for a purpose—that is, to light studios. Shooting everything in abject blackness is not arty, it's stupid.
And third is that Jennifer Jason Leigh is a wittily mean actress, as she has proved in everything from Weeds to The Hudsucker Proxy. Putting her in TV show just to stand around for 10 hours is a bunch of bool.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
King's best work is from the 70s and early 80s. I think that's when he was drinking or on drugs or maybe his nightmares were worse. More likely he just ran out of steam. He's had some interesting flashes of his old self since then.
He once claimed he could publish his laundry list and people would buy it. I think he's proven it. Anyway this sounds like a direct to video garbage.
Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are DSF V much better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
on this page.....VISIT HERE
thanks http://review-oto.com/viddle-agency-review-oto/
I wonder if it’s as bad as the series (vs the older TV movie) based on The Mist? That SUCKED
King doesn't translate to the screen. Sorry.
Christine was good but I think mostly because the evil force was a car, so Carpenter just needed the right soundtrack and lighting
What, you didn’t enjoy Maximum Overdrive? Philistine!
Yeardley Smith's acting opus. Who made who?
I was jacked for Maximum Overdrive but it wasn't Christine.
To this day I scare any animals and small kids in my vicinity when any appliance starts malfunctioning. My eyes bug out and I start twitching all over as I scream: “WE....MADE....YOU!!!!!”
He does translate to the screen, but it require translation. Which seems obvious, but way to many adaptations tried to be too faithful, or they just borrowed the title and did their own movie, or the director was just on drugs.
The Shining was a good example. King hated it, but it was a great translation to the big screen. King hated it because it wasn't a direct adaptation. The second IT (part one, not part two) was also great after translation. A direct adaptation would suck for so many reason. I mean, turtles and pubscent gangbangs and shit like didn't even work in the novel.
Don't forget the DT movie. What a steaming pile.
The more King is involved with a move, the worse it gets. Carrie, Shining, Shawshank, Misery and Stand by Me had little to no input from King. If King is listed as a screenwriter, producer or anything other than a “based on a story by” credit, it’s probably going to be a disappointing film.
Seriously though—-why can’t they do some Dean Koontz?
It happens, but Koontz is such a hard it's hard to know what book you're filming because the books are all the same.
GG is the best.
I remember despising this novel for the baby talk. And the other world that seemed to be, what, a lake and a moon? Maybe he meant to tie it to DT at some point.
4,4-Dimethylcyclohexanamine
https://buildingblock.bocsci.com/product/4-4-dimethylcyclohexanamine-cas-20615-18-3-308338.html
4,4-Dimethylcyclohexanamine - CAS 20615-18-3
Plastic Testing
https://www.matexcel.com/services/consumer-industrial-product-testing/plastic-and-rubber-testing/
The properties of plastics and rubber products are closely related to their composition, additives, processing methods, and so on.
I just cracked up at the Kenneth what is the frequency line! Great review the movie sounds like a horror.
Having stumbled on this odd blog, I was prepared to approach the subject with an open mind; yes, Lisey's Story pales next to much of King's other novels, even Dreamcatcher (which was also penned in the aftermath of King's being struck by a vehicle). Yes, the self-adaptation King wrote eliminates too many fine characters and narrative points. And, yes, "Every marriage has its secrets" is too wrought a line to describe the story (unless one, as this writer is not, is clever enough to see the way the titular character is drawn to the secret she's refused to acknowledge).
But forget an open mind for some moron who has neither read the novel in question nor watched more than 40 minutes' worth of its adapted TV series (the series this halfwit purports to review here).
How dare I issue the claim that this Garvin specimen hasn't done its work? Let's review, so to speak:
"Two years after a King-like horror novelist named Scott Landon was gunned down by a crazed fan..." Whoops. Anyone who had read the first few pages of the novel or bothered to watch 40 minutes' into the first adapted episode KNOWS SCOTT LANDON SURVIVED THAT SHOOTING. Sorry for the spoiler Glenn; at least now you don't have to actually watch it.
"...baby-talk language among the sisters, in which they call one another 'babyluv' and worse." Any but the most rank illiterate or most inobservant jackass knows 'babyluv' to be Scott, not her sisters, talking to Lisey. Indeed, it is only Scott and Lisa (oops another spoiler GG definitely didn't surmise Lisey = Lisa) who develop this babytalk. Babyluv, bool, booya moon, long boy; that is Landon language, not DeBoucher language. The sisters have their own, UNRELATED, baby talk: 'little Lisey,' 'big sis Manda Bunny,' etc.
There is no spooky hotel. There is no private graveyard. J Dooley is not comparable to A Wilkes in any way. This is lazy trash recycled by a lazy person who did not do their work.
I assert this 'writer,' reviewer,' 'unpaid contributor,' whatever it is, has never read a novel not written by Clancy or perhaps Ludlum (and even those it skipped to the final dozen pages less than halfway through). Its poor use of hyphenates in poorly describing King's freshman novel neither uses the hyphen nor describes the novel (it might describe the film if watched it out of the corner of an eye while folding laundry).
Read the novel, if claiming to have done so. Watch more than 33.8 minutes of the 10 hour work under observation, if purporting to write about it. The pseudo-intellectual tone of this error-littered no-go zone of the blogosphere is unworthy of reprinting the names King and Larrain, let alone issuing criticism of their work.