Parents Wrongly Accused of Killing Their Baby Are Freed 13 Years Later
"I do not hold any bitterness toward anybody."

A Georgia mom and dad convicted of murdering their days' old baby daughter have had all charges dismissed—after they each spent almost 13 years in prison.
The district attorney apologized that they never received a fair trial.
The case began in May 2008. Just a day after Ashley and Albert Debelbot brought their seemingly healthy baby girl, McKenzy, home, a bump was discovered on her forehead. The Debelbots brought her to Martin Army Hospital in Fort Benning, where she died a day later. The couple was accused of crushing her skull.
At their joint trial, their defense attorneys failed to present alternative explanations for the baby's death, including the fact that the baby may have been born with serious birth defects, exacerbated by a difficult delivery.
The defense attorneys also failed to object when, in closing arguments, Assistant District Attorney Sadhana Dailey told the jury that the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard "does not mean beyond all doubt." She added: "It does not mean to a mathematical certainty. Which means we don't have to prove that 90 percent. You don't have to be 90 percent sure. You don't have to be 80 percent sure. You don't have to be 51 percent sure."
The parents were sentenced to life in prison.
Over the years, with the help of the Georgia Public Defender Council, Wisconsin Innocence Project, some private firms, and Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit's public defenders office, the couple sought a new trial. While Muscogee Superior Court Judge Arthur Smith refused to grant one, the Supreme Court of Georgia eventually heard the case last year. This time, the defense presented medical evidence that the baby did indeed have a serious brain defect, and added that the DA's office had illegally suppressed brain scans that would have helped the defense make its case. The court unanimously overturned the Debelbots' convictions, saying they had been denied their Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel.
Initially, the government planned to retry the Debelbots. But just a few weeks ago, District Attorney Mark Jones, who inherited the case, decided not to do that. He told the Supreme Court that there was "mounting medical evidence that says the child was born this way"—that is, with a fatal brain defect. Then he went a step further and apologized to the Debelbots, on behalf of his office, for "not getting a fair trial."
This seemed to shock Ashley Debelbot almost more than being freed from a life sentence. Asked in a press conference how she felt about the DA's apology, she replied, "I thought I would never hear that word being said to me, ever. Once you've been incarcerated, the word 'sorry' never comes to you at all."
She added, "I do not hold any bitterness toward anybody."
Her husband, Albert Debelbot, seemed a little less mellow. "I joined the Army protecting the same freedom that was taken from me. I lost a buddy in Iraq and [another] buddy lost his leg protecting the freedom we so believe in. We came home and the same system that we went to war to protect would never protect us."
As an attorneys for the Debelbots observed: "Too often we would rather believe that good people did a bad thing for no reason, than believe that a bad thing happened to good people for no reason." Sadly, there are far too many people languishing in prison as a result of panic over shaken baby syndrome: See this and this and this.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"...the DA's office had illegally suppressed brain scans that would have helped the defense make its case.'
I am not an attorney, but is this not prosecutorial misconduct? If so, seems about right that the DA who brought this case to trial should do around 13 + 13 years in prison [among those who he also sent to prison]
In a just world, that would be the case. But in the real world, you would have to prosecute and prove both that it was prosecutorial misconduct and that it was intentional. Who has the independence, the resources and the incentive to prosecute the prosecutor?
JOB FOR USA Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much DS better than regular office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
on this page.....VISIT HERE
The state attorney general?
Whose career success depends on the support and cooperation of all the subordinate attorneys? Not likely.
Especially not likely if they are in the same political party.
Let's see 26 years off the life of someone who's probably in their 50s by now... ... meh, just feed 'em into the chipper.
13 years, son only half as bad...
If it is a republican prosecutor, facebook and twitter do.
Qualified immunity. FYTW.
Even better: prosecutors typically enjoy absolute immunity.
I'd want to know the timing of these scans---when were they available---and to whom. Why didn't their counsel subpoena them from the hospital, or interview the doctors, radiologists, and other staff? And so on. How do those scans meet the exculpatory evidence standard from Brady, etc...?
Horrible. Not just losing a child, but to get railroaded like this. I wonder why the prosecutor thought they had an abuse case in the first place vs a doc getting carried away during delivery?
demo https://tradermate-review.medium.com/online-business-ideas-for-seniors-and-retirees-plr-review-the-product-makes-you-proud-of-to-be-92a7bbca59bc
https://tradermate-review.medium.com/lazy-traffic-sniper-review-activate-your-own-300-day-traffic-system-2311db1973da
DA commits Brady violation but Defense Counsel ineffective?
"added that the DA's office had illegally suppressed brain scans that would have helped the defense make its case"
Moses would have known what to do - 26 years for the DA (see above).
Solomon would have cut him in half.
Yeah, but that was his answer for everything. King One Trick Pony.
His answer to everything was to get a new wife.
But just a few weeks ago, District Attorney Mark Jones, who inherited the case, decided not to do that.
No one seems to want to name his predecessor.
Could have been more than one.
Proof you'll never get a fair trial.
These officials need to be put in jail for this nonsense. I'd be suing the shit out of them and going after everything possible I could squeeze out of the state.
Bobby Russel had it right -
That's the night that the lights went out in Georgia
That's the night that they hung an innocent man
Well, don't trust your soul to no backwoods Southern lawyer
'Cause the judge in the town's got bloodstains on his hands
Thanks, Rheba
Dingo ate my baby.
Looks like Mark Jones, the DA who inherited, and decided to drop, tg he case has his own legal problems: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wtvm.com/2021/01/02/mark-jones-sworn-chattahoochee-judicial-circuit-district-attorney/%3foutputType=amp
Wow; now where is Arty to tell us to open wider for our {Democrat] betters?
Read following report to learn how a single mom was able to make $89,844/year in her spare time on her computer without selling anything... http://cash44.club
""I joined the Army protecting the same freedom that was taken from me."
More proof Statism is a mental disorder
She added, "I do not hold any bitterness toward anybody."
She's a moron.
She doesn't hold any bitterness... she didn't say anything about not having hatred, malice, seething rage, a thirst for blood, etc. 🙂