Bureau of Prisons Reverses Coronavirus Home Confinement Policy
"What they are doing to people is cruel and unusual. It isn't right."

The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) abruptly changed its policy yesterday for which inmates are eligible for early release into home confinement because of the threat of COVID-19, advocates and family members of inmates say, crushing the hopes of some inmates who had already been moved into pre-release quarantine.
According to multiple accounts from family members and the criminal justice advocacy group FAMM, the BOP informed inmates on Monday that it would not be waiving a requirement that inmates serve 50 percent of their sentence before they can become eligible for home confinement, despite earlier indications that it would.
It's unclear how many inmates who were approved for early release were disqualified.
The BOP did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
"The BOP is playing with people's lives," Kevin Ring, president of FAMM, said in a statement. "It's nothing short of cruel to tell hundreds of people they are going home, notifying their families and quarantining them for days, only to change your mind afterward."
Attorney General William Barr issued a directive on March 26 expanding compassionate release and home confinement transfers of elderly and at-risk inmates to mitigate potentially deadly COVID-19 outbreaks. Politico reported on April 9 that the BOP quietly expanded the directive and waived the 50 percent requirement as the virus spread through several federal prisons.
Inmates who are approved for early release are put into quarantine for two weeks. However, Ring tweeted yesterday that family members of inmates traveled to FCC Coleman, a federal prison complex in Florida, expecting to pick up their incarcerated loved ones, only to be told the policy had been changed.
At a town hall meeting today, they were told BOP is insisting on 50% requirement and people who don't qualify had their dates revoked. Families had to return without their loved ones. Hard to imagine how you could jerk someone around worse than that. But it keeps happening.
— Kevin Ring (@KevinARing) April 21, 2020
Reason received a message yesterday from a family member of a man incarcerated at FCI Elkton, a federal prison in Ohio that has been hit particularly hard by the virus.
"Last week, my Dad was told that he would be going to home confinement based on AG Barr's memo," the family member wrote. "They made him sign numerous documents on multiple occasions. Today, they told him that he was denied for home confinement because he hasn't served 50% of his sentence yet. The 50% threshold is explicitly NOT a criteria, yet they have still done this to him. Not to mention the sentence in the first place is way above the guidelines. What they are doing to people is cruel and unusual. It isn't right."
Politico received a similar email:
"They just posted a new BOP Bulletin a few minutes ago, reversing the Barr decision and requiring that those released to home confinement must have served 50% of their sentence," Stephen Donaldson, son of an inmate at a prison in Georgia, wrote in an email to POLITICO. "I was hoping to have my father home. He tells me a number of other inmates had started the quarantine pre release and then were told of the reversal."
The notifications appear to have gone out throughout the federal prison system:
Yes I got a call from my wife today in tears because they put her back into the general population and last week they moved her into a quarantine room to prepare for home confinement. I'm a medical provider. COVID-19 doesn't care if you have served 25% or 50% of your sentence.
— Josh Sorenson (@hogwired1) April 21, 2020
Yesterday Judge Alison Nathan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York called the BOP's quarantine policies "illogical" and "Kafkaesque" and said they put inmates at greater risk of contracting COVID-19.
According to the BOP's most recent numbers, there are 497 federal inmates and 319 staff infected with the virus. So far, 22 inmates have died from COVID-19 complications. There are roughly 20,000 federal inmates over the age of 55.
FAMM sent a letter today to BOP Director Michael Caraval today requesting more information and transparency from the agency.
"Tens of thousands of families across the country are deeply and understandably frightened for the health and safety of their incarcerated loved ones," Ring wrote. "The people inside BOP's facilities are confused, frightened, and vulnerable. They deserve maximum transparency from the BOP."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why won't someone think of the convicted felons!
Facebook is paying $530 Per day. Be a part of Facebook and start getting Extra Dollars every week from your home.Vcx ..I just got paid $8590 in my previous month……….,Visit Site
There are some dick moves that not even convicted felons deserve. This Bureau of Prisons reverse is one of them.
I am sure many victims and their families are, just not in the way the government thinks.
Prisons are no place for criminals!
One tenth of one percent have died of complications. Does that really qualify as "hard hit"?
Harvey Weinstein (no relationship) should be released on humanitarian grounds.
But they were all innocent!
I'm really curious what Josh Sorenson's wife did to get herself locked up. If his Twitter feed is any indication, she's reasonably hot, and they have three young children.
Also, she wasn't in prison as of January of last year, so this is a reasonably recent incarceration.
Almost certainly drug offenses, grand larceny, possession
The Bureau of Prisons has an inmate locator but you need to know the first name as well as the last name of a prisoner.
Anyway, why should I enact Reason's labor for them? They should know what the prisoners whose release they advocate have been convicted of.
I mean c'mon, convicted felons, hookers, illegal aliens, strippers, drug dealers deserve to live in our welfare system too.
I don't think stripping is a felony. Also, hookers don't need to be in a prison because they're already dead on the inside.
"You can't keep me in prison for my conviction because disease!"
Is there some way to segregate the population by cohort so they don’t cross contaminate?
But otherwise this seems like a fast track to herd immunity.
Do you always blow your dog whistles so loudly, white devil?
America is a bloodthirsty country. America is full of scared people. The majority like the stay-at-home orders. You think those people want a single person released?!?
data sidney Adalah kumpulan data Yang di satukan Menjadi Satu Kolom dalam Angka – Angka hasil temuan Dari terjemahan togel secara online jayatogel di buat untuk review para anggota atau para Pemain togel Sebab Sangat membatu para anggota Yang akan Bermain di hari Yang akan Datang.pada togel online pasaran sidney ini adalah salah satu yang terbesar di asia dan termasuk indonesia.
Sorry about that, criminals. You did the crime, you do the time. The idea that criminals are put on the street while gun stores are closed in many states is pure idiot logic. What could go wrong? As if they'll find a job out there. No, they'll return to crime. Shocker.
Why is the term "convicted felon" necessary? Are there innocent felons? Yes, all who have been convicted of a victimless crime. But those are not recognized as "innocent", just non-violent, non-fraudulent. For voluntarists it's the same thing.
So, why do statists use the redundant term? Is it psychological?
last month I COPY THIS WAB IT WAS VERY NICE PLEAS CLECK HER I THANKED FOR YOU.......... Read More
dheera dheera song lyrics in telugu